We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The form of the initial value constraints in Ashtekar's hamiltonian formulation of general relativity is recalled, and the problem of solving them is compared with that in the traditional metric variables. It is shown how the general solution of the four diffeomorphism constraints can be obtained algebraically provided the curvature is non-degenerate, and the form of the remaining (Gauss law) constraints is discussed. The method is extended to cover the case when matter is included, using an approach due to Thiemann. The application of the method to vacuum Bianchi models is given. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of alternative approaches to the initial value problem in the Ashtekar formulation.
Introduction
It is with great pleasure that we dedicate this paper to Dieter Brill, our teacher, advisor, and colleague, on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Our contribution concerns the initial value problem for general relativity, which is amongst Dieter's many areas of expertise. As is the case with almost all research activity developed around the general relativity group at the University of Maryland, the ideas we will present have benefitted from Dieter's always kind and sometimes maddening insightful questioning. Of course it is our wish that this paper will prompt some more such questioning.
A framework for a physical interpretation of quantum cosmology appropriate to a nonperturbative hamiltonian formulation is proposed. It is based on the use of matter fields to define a physical reference frame. In the case of the loop representation it is convenient to use a spatial reference frame that picks out the faces of a fixed simplicial complex and a clock built with a free scalar field. Using these fields a procedure is proposed for constructing physical states and operators in which the problem of constructing physical operators reduces to that of integrating ordinary differential equations within the algebra of spatially diffeomorphism invariant operators. One consequence is that we may conclude that the spectra of operators that measure the areas of physical surfaces are discrete independently of the matter couplings or dynamics of the gravitational field.
Using the physical observables and the physical inner product, it becomes possible to describe singularities, black holes and loss of information in a nonperturbative formulation of quantum gravity, without making reference to a background metric. While only a dynamical calculation can answer the question of whether quantum effects eliminate singularities, it is conjectured that, if they do not, loss of information is a likely result because the physical operator algebra that corresponds to measurements made at late times must be incomplete.
We use a λΦ4 scalar quantum field theory to illustrate a new approach to the study of quantum to classical transition. In this approach, the decoherence functional is employed to assign probabilities to consistent histories defined in terms of correlations among the fields at separate points, rather than the field itself. We present expressions for the quantum amplitudes associated with such histories, as well as for the decoherence functional between two of them. The dynamics of an individual consistent history may be described by a Langevintype equation, which we derive.
Dedicated to Professor Brill on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, August 1993
Introduction
Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics and Paradigms of Statistical Mechanics
This paper attempts to bring together two basic concepts, one from the foundations of statistical mechanics and the other from the foundations of quantum mechanics, for the purpose of addressing two basic issues in physics:
the quantum to classical transition, and
the quantum origin of stochastic dynamics.
Both issues draw in the interlaced effects of dissipation, decoherence, noise, and fluctuation. A central concern is the role played by coarse-graining —the naturalness of its choice, the effectiveness of its implementation and the relevance of its consequences.
We propose primal-chaos black holes (PCBHs) as candidates for the missing mass. Beginning with a discussion of the mystery of the missing mass, in its various formulations, we motivate PCBHs as “dark matter.” Envisioning black hole production from colliding gravity waves, we develop a model of time symmetric, axially symmetric gravity waves by making use of the Brill methodology. Through numerical spectral-element techniques, the geometry of space is determined. We discuss trapped surfaces as the signatures of impending collapse to a black hole, and are thereby able to identify, through numerical relaxation, which geometries will undergo gravitational collapse. We are thus able to determine the critical wave amplitude at which black hole production from imploding gravity waves begins. We conclude with a brief discussion of observational limits.
Introduction
“I just can't understand it. All the young men I know are retiring.” So exclaimed Mrs. Niels Bohr in a post-war visit to Princeton on seeing Paul Dirac look from floor to ceiling and back again to floor in a desperate effort to answer her question, “Who is there now at Cambridge? Is Robert Frisch still there?”
“Frisch is retiring. I cannot remember who else is there, except me.”
Any thought of Brill retiring is foreign to anyone who sees him in action, as vigorous now as he was in his Princeton undergraduate (A.B. 1954) and graduate (Ph. D. 1959) days.
Of the many influential contributions made by Dieter Brill to the mathematical development of general relativity, one of particular significance was his discovery together with Stanley Deser, of the linearization stability problem for Einstein's equations [1]. Brill and Deser showed that the Einstein equations are not always linearization stable (in a sense we shall define more precisely below) and they initiated the long (and still continuing) technical program to deal with this problem when it arises.
Our aim in this article is not to review the extensive literature of positive results on linearization stability but rather simply to introduce the reader to this subject and then to discuss some recent research that has developed out of the study of linearization stability problems. These latter include the relationship of linearization stability questions to the problem of the Hamiltonian reduction of Einstein's equations and lead one directly to the study of a number of recent results in pure Riemannian geometry (e.g., the solution of the Yamabe problem by Schoen, Aubin, Trudinger and Yambe, the Gromov-Lawson results on the existence of metrics of positive scalar curvature and the still unfinished classification problem for compact 3-manifolds). They also include a study of the quantum analogue of the linearization stability problem which has been significantly advanced recently by the work of A.
Brill waves are the simplest (non-trivial) solutions to the vacuum constraints of general relativity. They are also rich enough in structure to allow us believe that they capture, at least in part, the generic properties of solutions of the Einstein equations. As such, they deserve the closest attention. This article illustrates this point by showing how Brill waves can be used to investigate the structure of conformal superspace.
INTRODUCTION
From time to time I amuse myself by mentally assembling a list of articles I would like to have written. The candidates for this list have to satisfy a number of criteria. Naturally, they have to be both important and interesting to me. Equally, they have to contain results that I can convince myself, however unreasonably, that I could have obtained. Every time I make my list I am struck again by the number of articles by Dieter Brill appearing on it. At first glance, this is explained by the large overlap between our interests. In reality, however, the explanation is to be found by considering the kind of article that Dieter has written over the years and the way in which he manages to convey major insights in a deceptively simple fashion.
It has been pointed out that the physical states in linearized quantum gravity are required to be invariant under the continuous isometries of the background spacetime if the Cauchy surfaces are compact. This requirement would appear to allow only the vacuum state as the physical state in linearized quantum gravity in de Sitter spacetime. The first step toward resolving this apparent paradox is to construct a new Hilbert space of de Sitter-invariant states. In this article an approach to this task is presented. First de Sitter-invariant states with infinite norm are constructed by smearing the states in the original Fock space of linearized gravity over the de Sitter group. Then a finite inner product of these states is defined by dividing the original inner product by the infinite volume of the de Sitter group. The Hilbert space of de Sitter-invariant states thus obtained is hoped to serve as a starting point toward a meaningful perturbative quantum gravity (at the tree level) in de Sitter spacetime.
Introduction
In discussing solutions to the linearized Einstein equations, it is important to make sure that they extend to exact solutions. It was found by Professors Brill and Deser [2, 3] that there are spurious solutions in linearized gravity in static flat spacetime with the topology of the 3-torus (T3).
We resolve the longstanding paradox that in classical electrodynamics the energy and linear momentum of the Abraham-Lorentz (classical) electron do not transform as 4-vector components under Lorentz transformations. In our treatment these quantities transform properly and remain finite in the point particle limit.
Introduction
In Classical Electrodynamics the energy and linear momentum of the extended classical electron do not transform as components of a 4-vector (Leighton, 1959); also infinities arise in the point charge limit.
Abraham (1905) and Lorentz (1909) proposed the classical model of the electron. Lorentz suggested a model in which the electron consisted of a thin, uniformly charged shell. Poincaré (1909) added a stress in order to stabilize the electron. However, he used an expression for the cohesive stress-energy tensor which led to difficulties (Fermi, 1922; Pais, 1948).
Dirac (1938a, 1938b), Matthison (1931, 1940, 1942) and others have proposed point particle models for the classical electron. The lack of covariance associated with the Abraham-Lorentz model and other extended models of the electron does not arise in such models or in classical models based on non local generalisations of Maxwell electromagnetism; see for example, Bopp (1942), McManus (1948) and Feynmann (1948). Erber (1961) reviews much of the literature on models of the classical electron.
We analyze the degree of equivalence between abelian topologically massive, gauge-invariant, vector or tensor parity doublets and their explicitly massive, non-gauge, counterparts. We establish equivalence of field equations by exploiting a generalized Stueckelberg invariance of the gauge systems. Although the respective excitation spectra and induced source-source interactions are essentially identical, there are also differences, most dramatic being those between the Einstein limits of the interactions in the tensor case: the doublets avoid the discontinuity (well-known from D=4) exhibited by Pauli—Fierz theory.
It is a pleasure to dedicate this work to Dieter Brill on the occasion of his 60th birthday. I have learned much from him over the years, not least during our old collaborations on general relativity. I hope he will be entertained by these considerations of related theories in another dimension.
Introduction
Perhaps the most paradoxical feature of topologically massive (TM) theories [1, 2] is that their gauge invariance coexists with the finite mass and single helicity, parity violating, character of their excitations. This phenomenon, common to vector (TME) and tensor (TMG) models, is special to 2+1 dimensions because in higher (odd) dimensions the operative Chern—Simons (CS) terms are of at least cubic order in these fields and so do not affect their kinematics; only higher rank tensors could acquire a topological mass there.
If string theory describes nature, then charged black holes are not described by the Reissner-Nordström solution. This solution must be modified to include a massive dilaton. In the limit of vanishing dilaton mass, the new solution can be found by a generalization of the Harrison transformation for the Einstein-Maxwell equations. These two solution generating transformations and the resulting black holes are compared. It is shown that the extremal black hole with massless dilaton can be viewed as the “square root” of the extremal Reissner-Nordström solution. When the dilaton mass is included, extremal black holes are repulsive, and it is energetically favorable for them to bifurcate into smaller holes.
INTRODUCTION
It is a pleasure to honor Dieter Brill on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. Over the years, Dieter has worked on many aspects of general relativity. But two of his recent interests are negative energy (in higher dimensional theories) (Brill and Pfister 1989; Brill and Horowitz 1991), and the possibility that extremal charged black holes can quantum mechanically bifurcate (Brill 1992). I would like to describe some recent work which touches on both of these areas.
For many years, it has been widely believed that static charged black holes in nature are accurately described by the Reissner-Nordström solution.
It is shown that if a non-flat spacetime (M, g) whose future c-boundary is a single point satisfies RabVaVb ≥ 0 for all timelike vectors Va, equality holding only if Rab = 0, then sufficiently close to the future c-boundary the spacetime can be uniquely foliated by constant mean curvature compact hypersurfaces. The uniqueness proof uses a variational method developed by Brill and Flaherty to establish the uniqueness of maximal hypersurfaces.
In 1976 Dieter Brill and Frank Flaherty (1976) published an extremely important paper, “Isolated Maximal Hypersurfaces in Spacetime”, establishing that maximal hypersurfaces are unique in closed universes with attractive gravity everywhere. That is, there is only one such hypersurface, if it exists at all. In an earlier paper, Brill had established that in three-torus universes, only suitably identified flat space possessed a maximal hypersurface, so the existence of a maximal hypersurface is not guaranteed. These results by Brill are important because maximal hypersurfaces are very convenient spacelike hypersurfaces upon which to impose initial data; on such hypersurfaces the constraint equations are enormously simplified. Furthermore, in asymptotically flat space, foliations of spacetime by maximal hypersurfaces often exist, and the simplifications of the constraint equations on such a foliation make it easy to numerically solve the full four-dimensional vacuum Einstein equations for physically interesting situations.
The authors have introduced recently a “microcanonical functional integral” which yields directly the density of states as a function of energy. The phase of the functional integral is Jacobi's action, the extrema of which are classical solutions at a given energy. This approach is general but is especially well suited to gravitating systems because for them the total energy can be fixed simply as a boundary condition on the gravitational field. In this paper, however, we ignore gravity and illustrate the use of Jacobi's action by computing the density of states for a nonrelativistic harmonic oscillator.
DEDICATION
We dedicate this paper to Dieter Brill in honor of his sixtieth birthday. His continued fruitful research in physics and his personal kindness make him a model colleague. JWY would especially like to thank him for countless instructive discussions and for his friendship over the past twenty—five years.
INTRODUCTION
Jacobi's form of the action principle involves variations at fixed energy, rather than the variations at fixed time used in Hamilton's principle. The fixed time interval in Hamilton's action becomes fixed inverse temperature in the “periodic imaginary time” formulation, thus transforming Hamilton's action into the appropriate (imaginary) phase for a periodic path in computing the canonical partition function from a Feynman functional integral (Feynman and Hibbs 1965).
It is shown that the attempt to extend the notion of ideal measurement to quantum field theory leads to a conflict with locality, because (for most observables) the state vector reduction associated with an ideal measurement acts to transmit information faster than light. Two examples of such information-transfer are given, first in the quantum mechanics of a pair of coupled subsystems, and then for the free scalar field in flat spacetime. It is argued that this problem leaves the Hilbert space formulation of quantum field theory with no definite measurement theory, removing whatever advantages it may have seemed to possess vis a vis the sum-over-histories approach, and reinforcing the view that a sum-over-histories framework is the most promising one for quantum gravity.
INTRODUCTION: IDEAL MEASUREMENTS AND QUANTUM FIELD THEORY
Whatever may be its philosophical limitations, the textbook interpretation of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is probably adequate to provide the quantum formalism with all the predictive power required for laboratory applications. It is also self-consistent in the sense that there exist idealized models of measurements which allow the system-observer boundary to be displaced arbitrarily far in the direction of the observer. And the associated “transformation theory” possesses a certain formal beauty, seemingly realizing the “complementarity principle” in terms of the unitary equivalence of all orthonormal bases.
It is Dieter Brill's gentle insistence on clarity of vision and depth of perception that has so influenced the development of general relativity and the scholarship of his colleagues and students. In both research and teaching, he is always searching for simpler descriptions with a deeper meaning. Ranging from positive energy and the initial value problem to linearization stability, from Mach's principle to topology change, Dieter's unique style has left its mark. The collection of essays here dedicated to Dieter Brill is a fitting tribute and clear testimony to the impact of Dieter's contributions.
This Festschrift is the second volume of the proceedings of an international symposium on Directions in General Relativity organized at the University of Maryland, College Park, May 27–29, 1993 in honour of the sixtieth birthdays of Professor Dieter Brill, born on August 9, 1933, and Professor Charles Misner. The first volume is a Festschrift for Professor Misner, whose sixtieth birthday was on June 13, 1992.
Ever since we announced a symposium and Festschrift for these two esteemed scientists in the Fall of 1991, we have been blessed with enthusiastic responses from friends, colleagues and former students of Charlie and Dieter all around the globe. Without their encouragement and participation this celebration could not have been realized.
Recent studies of topology change and other topological effects have been typically initiated by considering semiclassical amplitudes for the transition of interest. Such amplitudes are constructed from riemannian or possibly complex solutions of the Einstein equations. This simple fact limits the possible transitions for a variety of possible matter sources. The case of riemannian solutions with strongly positive stress-energy is the most restrictive: no possible solution exists that mediates topology change between two or more boundary manifolds. Restrictions also exist for riemannian solutions with negative or indefinite stress-energy sources: all boundary manifolds must admit a metric with nonnegative curvature. This condition strongly restricts the possible topologies of the boundary manifolds given that most manifolds only admit metrics with negative curvature. Finally, the ability to construct explicit examples of topology changing instantons relies on the existence of a symmetry or symmetries that simplify the relevant equations. It follows that initial data with symmetry cannot give rise to a nonsymmetric solution of the Einstein equations. Moreover, analyticity properties of the Einstein equations strongly suggest that in general, complex solutions encounter the same topological restrictions. Thus the possibilities for topology change in the semiclassical limit are highly limited, indicating that detailed investigations of such effects should be carried out in terms of a more general construction of quantum amplitudes.