Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:42:15.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2019

Paul Eggert
Paul Eggert
Affiliation:
Loyola University, Chicago
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Work and the Reader in Literary Studies
Scholarly Editing and Book History
 , pp. 219 - 236
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Thomas R. and Barker, Nicholas. ‘A New Model for the Study of the Book’. In A Potencie of Life: Books in Society. Ed. Barker, Nicolas. London: British Library, 2001. Pp. 5–43.Google Scholar
Akhurst, William Mower. The House That Jack Built. In Australian Plays for the Colonial Stage 1834–1899. Ed. Fotheringham, Richard. The Academy Editions of Australian Literature. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 2006. Pp. 217–314.Google Scholar
Andrews, Tara. ‘Freeing Our Texts from Their (Digital Tool) Chains’. In TEI 2016 Book of Abstracts. 2016. http://tei2016.acdh.oeaw.ac.at/sites/default/files/TEIconf2016_BookOfAbstracts.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2017.Google Scholar
Anesko, Michael. Generous Mistakes: Incidents of Error in Henry James. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Anesko, Michael. ‘The Textual Condition of The Ambassadors: A Revised Scenario’. Henry James Review. 38.2 (Spring 2017), 134–56.Google Scholar
Anker, Elizabeth S. and Felski., Rita Critique and Postcritique. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Anonymous. [No title]. Publishers Weekly. 26 December 1914, p. 2071.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Paul. ‘In Defense of Reading: Or, Why Reading Still Matters in a Contextualist Age’. New Literary History. 42 (2011), 87–113.Google Scholar
Babbage, Frances. Adaptation in Contemporary Theatre: Performing Literature. London: Bloomsbury, 2018.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. ‘From Work to Text’. In Barthes, Roland. Image Music Text. Tr. Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977. Pp. 155–64.Google Scholar
Barton, G. B. ‘Literature in NSW: ii. How the Publishers Look at It’. Centennial Magazine. 2 (1889), pp. 89–90.Google Scholar
Barton, G. B. ‘Literature in NSW: iii. How the Newspaper Proprietors Look at It’. Centennial Magazine. 2 (1889), 238–40.Google Scholar
Bateson, F. W. ‘The Function of Criticism at the Present Time’. Essays in Criticism. 3 (1953), 1–27.Google Scholar
Battestin, Martin C. ‘A Rationale of Literary Annotation: The Example of Fielding’s Novels’. Studies in Bibliography. 34 (1981), 1–22.Google Scholar
Bell, Maureen. ‘Introduction: The Material Text’. In Re-constructing the Book: Literary Texts in Transmission. Ed. Bell, Maureen, Chew, Shirley, Eliot, Simon, Hunter, Lynette and West, James L. W. III. Aldershot: Ashgate, [2001]. Pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Bennett, Betty. ‘The Editor of Letters As Critic: A Denial of “Blameless Neutrality”’. TEXT. 6 (1994), 213–23.Google Scholar
Berrie, Phill, Eggert, Paul, Tiffin, Chris and Barwell, Graham. ‘Authenticating Electronic Editions’. In Electronic Textual Editing. Ed. Burnard, Lou, O’Brien O’Keeffe, Katherine and Unsworth, John. New York: Modern Language Association, 2006. Pp. 269–76.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Ina and Routt, William D., ‘The Picture That Will Live Forever’: The Story of the Kelly Gang. Melbourne: The Moving Image, 2007. Distributed with the DVD of Tait Brothers. The Story of the Kelly Gang. Richmond, Vic.: Madman Entertainment, 2007.Google Scholar
Black, Michael. Learning to Be a Publisher: Cambridge University Press 1951–1987 Personal Reminiscences. Cambridge: Privately published, 2011.Google Scholar
[Blake, William]. The William Blake Archive. Ed. Eaves, Morris, Essick, Robert N. and Viscomi, Joseph. blakearchive.org. 1996–. Accessed 15 August 2018.Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice. The Space of Literature. (In French 1955). Tr. Smock, Ann. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Blouin, Francis X. Jr and Rosenberg, William G.. Processing the Past: Contesting Authorities in History and the Archives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bode, Katherine. ‘The Equivalence of “Close” and “Distant” Reading; or, Toward a New Object for Data-Rich Literary History’. Modern Language Quarterly. 78.1 (2017), 77–106.Google Scholar
Bode, Katherine. A World of Fiction: Mass-Digitization, Nineteenth-Century Newspapers and the Future of Literary History. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Bode, Katherine and Osborne, Roger. ‘Book History from the Archival Record’. In The Cambridge Companion to the History of the Book. Ed. Howsam, Leslie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Pp. 219–36.Google Scholar
Boldrewood, Rolf. ‘Incidents and Adventures of My Run Home, by an Australian’. Town and Country Journal. 10 January–19 December 1874.Google Scholar
Boldrewood, Rolf. Rolf Boldrewood. Ed. Brissenden, Alan. Portable Australian Authors. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Boldrewood, Rolf. Robbery under Arms. Ed. Eggert, Paul and Webby, Elizabeth. The Academy Editions of Australian Literature. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Bonell, Thomas F. ‘When Book History Neglects Bibliography: Trouble with the “Old Canon” in The Reading Nation’. Studies in Bibliography. 57 (2005–6), 243–62.Google Scholar
Bordalejo, Barbara. ‘The Encoding System for the Commedia’. In The Commedia of Dante Alighieri. Ed. Shaw, Prue. Birmingham: Scholarly Digital Editions, 2010.Google Scholar
Borlase, James Skipp. Ned Kelly, the Ironclad Australian Bushranger/by One of His Captors. London: General Publishing Company, [1881 in thirty-eight illustrated weekly parts].Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Field of Cultural Production. Ed. Johnson., Randal Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Bowers, Fredson. ‘Established Texts and Definitive Editions’. Philological Quarterly. 41 (1962), 1–17.Google Scholar
Bowers, Fredson. ‘A Preface to the Text’. In The Scarlet Letter. The Centenary Edition of the Works of Nathaniel Hawthorne. Vol. 1. Ed. Charvat, William, Pearce, Roy Harvey, Simpson, Claude M., Bowers, Fredson and Bruccoli, Matthew J.. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Bozovic, Marijeta. ‘Whose Forms? Missing Russians in Caroline Levine’s Forms’. PMLA. 132 (2017), 1181–6.Google Scholar
Brissenden, Alan. Rolf Boldrewood. Australian Writers and Their Works. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Brissenden, Alan. ‘Robbery under Arms: A Continuing Success’. In The Australian Experience: Critical Essays on Australian Novels. Ed. Ramson, W. S.. Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Brown, Angus Connell. ‘Cultural Studies and Close Reading’. PMLA. 132 (2017), 1187–93.Google Scholar
Brown, Max. Australian Son: The Story of Ned Kelly. Melbourne: Georgian House, 1956.Google Scholar
Brown, Susan. ‘Tensions and Tenets of Socialized Scholarship’. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. 31.2 (2016), 283–300.Google Scholar
Brüning, Gerrit, Henzel, Katrin and Pravida, Dietmar. ‘Multiple Encoding in Genetic Editions: The Case of Faust’. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative. 4 (March 2013). https://jtei.revues.org/563. Accessed 13 August 2017.Google Scholar
Bryant, John. The Fluid Text: A Theory of Revision and Editing for Book and Screen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Bryant, John. ‘Rewriting Moby-Dick: Politics, Textual Identity, and the Revision Narrative’. PMLA. 125 (2010), 1043–60.Google Scholar
Bryant, John. ‘Textual Identity and Adaptive Revision: Editing Adaptation As a Fluid Text’. In Adaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions. Ed. Bruhn, Jörgen, Gjelsvik, Anne and Hanssen, Eirik Frisvold. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013. Pp. 47–68.Google Scholar
Callahan, David. ‘Whiteness under Arms: Rolf Boldrewood and Rosa Praed’s Outlaw Narratives’. Westerly. 44 (1999), 76–88.Google Scholar
Callahan, David. Is Boldrewood Readable? London: Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, 2004.Google Scholar
Carter, David. ‘Structures, Networks, Institutions: The New Empiricism, Book History and Literary History’. In Resourceful Reading: The New Empiricism, eResearch and Australian Literary Culture. Ed. Bode, Katherine and Dixon, Robert. Sydney: Sydney University Press, 2009. Pp. 31–52.Google Scholar
[Chaucer, Geoffrey]. Canterbury Tales Project II. Ed. Peter Robinson and Barbara Bordalejo. n.d. www.textualcommunities.usask.ca/web/canterbury-tales. Accessed 29 July 2017.Google Scholar
Clarke, Marcus. His Natural Life. Ed. Stuart, Lurline. The Academy Editions of Australian Literature. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Clayton, Thomas. ‘Introduction: Hamlet’s Ghost’. In The Hamlet First Published (Q1, 1603): Origins, Form, Intertextualities. Ed. Clayton, Thomas. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Clune, Michael W. ‘Formalism As the Fear of Ideas’. PMLA. 132 (2017), 1194–9.Google Scholar
Coats, Lauren and Dean, Gabrielle. ‘Archive’. Modern Language Association Commons Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities: Concepts, Models and Experiments. https://digitalpedagogy.commons.mla.org/keywords/archive/. Accessed 29 July 2017.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Poems (Reading Text), Poems (Variorum Text) and Plays. 6 vols. Ed. Mays, J. C. C.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Congreve, William. The Works of William Congreve. Ed. McKenzie, D. F. with Ferdinand, C. Y.. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Connor, Francis X. ‘The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson Online’. Review Article. Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America. 109.2 (2015), 247–63.Google Scholar
[Conrad, Joseph]. Joseph Conrad: Letters to William Blackwood and David S. Meldrum. Ed. Blackburn, William. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Conrad, Joseph. The Collected Letters of Joseph Conrad. Gen. Ed. Karl, Frederick R. and Davies, Laurence with Knowles, Owen, Moore, Gene M. and Stape, J. H.. 9 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983–2007.Google Scholar
Conrad, Joseph. Youth, Heart of Darkness, The End of the Tether. Ed. Knowles, Owen. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Joseph Conrad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Conrad, Joseph. Lord Jim, a Tale. Ed. Stape, J. H. and Sullivan, Ernest W. II. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Joseph Conrad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Conrad, Joseph. Under Western Eyes. Ed. Osborne, Roger and Eggert, Paul. Introduction by Keith Carabine and Explanatory Notes by Keith Carabine and Jeremy Hawthorn. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Joseph Conrad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Conrad, Joseph. Heart of Darkness. Norton Fifth Critical Edition. Ed. Armstrong, Paul. New York: Norton, 2016.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Ian. ‘An Edition of the Archetype of Piers Plowman B’. Yearbook of Langland Studies. 32 (2018), 395–419.Google Scholar
Craig, George. ‘Reading: Who Is Doing What to Whom?’ In The Modern English Novel: The Reader, the Writer and the Work. Ed. Josipovici, Gabriel. London: Open Books, 1976. Pp. 15–36.Google Scholar
Crombie, Donald and Hannam, Ken, directors. Robbery Under Arms. Film. [Adelaide]: South Australian Film Corporation Productions, 1985.Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert. ‘What Is the History of Books?’ Daedalus. 3.3 (1982), 65–89.Google Scholar
Dawson, Anthony B. ‘Textual Introduction’ [to Hamlet]. In The Norton Shakespeare. Third Edition. Gen. Ed. Greenblatt, Stephen, Cohen, Walter, Howard, Jean E., Eisaman, Katharine Gordon, Maus McMullan, and Gossett, Suzanne. New York: Norton, 2016. Pp. 1760–3.Google Scholar
Dawson, Stuart E. Ned Kelly and the Myth of a Republic of North-Eastern Victoria. Clayton, Vic.: self-published PDF, 2018. www.ironicon.com.au/ned-kelly-republic-myth.htm. Accessed 8 August 2018.Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta and Stallybrass, Peter, ‘The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text’. Shakespeare Quarterly. 44 (1993), 255–83.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Tr. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Denham, Arnold and Another. The Kelly Gang. In Australian Plays for the Colonial Stage 1834–1899. Ed. Fotheringham, Richard. The Academy Editions of Australian Literature. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. ‘Signature Event Context’. In Derrida., Jacques A Derrida Reader: Between the Blinds. Ed. Kamuf, Peggy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Tr. Prenowitz, Eric. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Paper Machine. (In French, 2001). Tr. Bowlby, Rachel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
[Devaney, James]. ‘Rolf Boldrewood: A Critical Study’. Courier [Brisbane, Qld]. 23 February 1924, p. 17.Google Scholar
Dewey, John and Bentley, Arthur F.. Knowing and the Known. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Emily. The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson. Ed. Johnson, Thomas H.. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Emily. The Poems of Emily Dickinson: Variorum Edition. Ed. Franklin, R. W.. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dillon, Janette. ‘Is There a Performance in This Text?’ Shakespeare Quarterly. 45 (1994), 74–86.Google Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. ‘Literature for the Planet’. PMLA. 116 (2001), 173–88.Google Scholar
Docker, John. ‘Postmodernism, Cultural History and the Feminist Legend of the Nineties: Robbery under Arms, the Novel, the Play’. In The 1890s: Australian Literature and Literary Culture. Ed. Stewart, Ken. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1996. Pp. 128–49.Google Scholar
Dolan, Beth, ed. Kelly Culture: Reconstructing Ned Kelly. Melbourne: State Library of Victoria, 2003.Google Scholar
Duggan, Hoyt N. ‘The Electronic Piers Plowman B: A New Diplomatic-Critical Edition’. Æestel. 1 (1993), 1–21.Google Scholar
Dunstan, Keith. Saint Ned: The Story of the Near Sanctification of an Australian Outlaw. Sydney: Methuen, 1980.Google Scholar
Eaves, Morris, Essick, Robert N. and Viscomi, Joseph. ‘Editorial Principles’. In [Blake, William]. The William Blake Archive. Ed. Eaves, Morris, Essick, Robert N and Viscomi, Joseph. blakearchive.org/staticpage/archiveataglance?p=editorialprinciples. n.d. Accessed 15 August 2018.Google Scholar
Egan, Gabriel. The Struggle for Shakespeare’s Text: Twentieth Century Editorial Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘The Literary Work of a Readership: The Boy in the Bush in Australia 1924–1926’. Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin. 12 (1988), 149–66.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Document or Process As the Site of Authority: Establishing Chronology of Revision in Competing Typescripts of Lawrence’s The Boy in the Bush’. Studies in Bibliography. 44 (1991), 364–76.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Document and Text: The “Life” of the Literary Work and the Capacities of Editing’. TEXT. 7 (1994), 1–24.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Reading a Critical Edition with the Grain and Against’. In Editing D. H. Lawrence: New Versions of a Modern Author. Ed. Ross, Charles L. and Jackson, Dennis. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 1995. Pp. 27–40.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Social Discourse or Authorial Agency? Bridging the Divide between Editing and Theory’. In The Editorial Gaze. Ed. Eggert, Paul and Sankey, Margaret. New York: Garland, 1998. Pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Robbery under Arms: The Colonial Market, Imperial Publishers and the Demise of the Three-Decker Novel’. Book History. 6 (2003), 127–46.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘The Bibliographic Life of an Australian Classic: Robbery under Arms’. Script & Print. 29 (2005), 73–92.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Text-Encoding, Theories of the Text, and the “Work-Site”’. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 20 (2005), 425–35.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Version – Agency – Intention’: The Cross-fertilising of German and Anglo-American Editorial Traditions’. Variants: Journal of the European Society for Textual Scholarship. 4 (2005), 5–28.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Peter Carey’s True History of the Kelly Gang’. In Paper Empires: A History of the Book in Australia, vol. 3 1946–2004. Ed. Munro, Craig and Sheahan-Bright, Robin. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 2006. Pp. 260–3.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘What Critical Editing Teaches Us about Texts, Works and Books’. Lecture. Leicester, UK: De Montfort University, 1 June 2006. PDF. http://cts.dmu.ac.uk/repository/eggert-2006.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Textual Criticism and Folklore: The Ned Kelly Story and Robbery under Arms’. Script & Print. 31.2 (2007), 69–80.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘The Book, E-Text and the “Work-Site”’. Text Editing, Print and the Digital World. Ed. Deegan, Marilyn and Sutherland, Kathryn. London: Ashgate, 2009. Pp. 63–82.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. Securing the Past: Conservation in Art, Architecture and Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Text As Algorithm and As Process’. In Text and Genre in Reconstruction: Effects of Digitalization on Ideas, Behaviours, Products and Institutions. Ed. McCarty, Willard. Cambridge: OpenBook, 2010. Pp. 183–202.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Anglo-American Critical Editing: Concepts, Terms and Methodologies’. Ecdotica. 9 (2012), 113–24.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Brought to Book: Bibliography, Book History and the Study of Literature’. The Library. 7th ser. 13.1 (2012), 3–32.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘The Hand of the Present’. Textual Cultures. 7.2 (2012), 3–19.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Text, Work and Authorship in the Age of the Digital Humanities: Reconceiving the Philological Endeavour’. Conference paper. book:logic4 conference. University of Western Australia, Perth, 29 June 2012.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. Biography of a Book: Henry Lawson’s ‘While the Billy Boils’. Sydney: Sydney University Press and State College: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Lawrence, Twilight in Italy and the Limits of the Foreign: A Print Culture Approach’. In Lake Garda: Gateway to D. H. Lawrence’s Voyage to the Sun. Ed. Ceramella, Nick. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘What We Edit, How We Edit; or, Why Not to Ring-Fence the Text’. Ecdotica. 10 (2013), 50–63.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘The Reader-Oriented Scholarly Edition’. Digital Studies in the Humanities. 31.4 (2016), 797–810.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Charles Harpur: The Editorial Nightmare’. Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature. 16.2 (2016) https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/JASAL/article/view/11011. Accessed 29 July 2017.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘Versions and Versioning: A Critical Archive of D. H. Lawrence’. Archiv. 254.1 (2017), 82–95.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘The Cambridge Edition’. In D. H. Lawrence in Context. Ed. Harrison, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Pp. 304–14.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul. ‘The Archival Impulse and the Editorial Impulse’. Variants: Journal of the European Society for Textual Scholarship. 14 (2019), 3–24 https://journals.openedition.org/variants/570.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul and Schmidt, Desmond. ‘Romantic Poetry and Technical Breakthrough: The Charles Harpur Critical Archive’. Archiv. 255.2 (2018), 382–8.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul with McCauley, Kym. ‘Critical and Scholarly Editing in Australia and New Zealand in the Last Twenty-Five Years: An Essay on the Nomenclature of Editions and a Representative Listing’. Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin. 19 (1995), 241–55.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Elizabeth. The Printing Press As an Agent of Change. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Eliot, Simon. Some Patterns and Trends in British Publishing, 1800–1919. London: Bibliographical Society, 1990.Google Scholar
English, James F. The Global Future of English Studies. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Erkkila, Betsy. ‘The Emily Dickinson Wars’. In The Cambridge Companion to Emily Dickinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Pp. 11–29.Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas. Shakespeare As Literary Dramatist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Fabbri, Elisabetta, ed. La Fenice ‘splendidezza di ornamenti e dorature’: The Artistic Reconstruction. Tr. Byatt, Lucinda. Rome: De Luca Editori d’Arte, 2004.Google Scholar
Fabinyi, Andrew. ‘The Australian Book’. In Literary Australia. Ed. Semmler, Clement and Whitelock, Derek. Melbourne: Cheshire, 1966.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien and Martin, Henri-Jean. The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing, 1450–1800. London: Verso, 1976. (Originally in French as L’Apparition du livre, 1958).Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, David. The House of Blackwood: Author–Publisher Relations in the Victorian Era. State College: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Fisher, Philip. Making and Effacing Art: Modern American Art in a Culture of Museums. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. ‘What Is an Author?’ In The Foucault Reader. Ed. Rabinow, Paul. London: Penguin, 1986. Pp. 101–20.Google Scholar
Gabler, Hans Walter. ‘Synchrony and Diachrony of Texts: Practice and Theory of the Critical Edition of James Joyce’s Ulysses’. TEXT: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship. 1 (1981), 305–26.Google Scholar
Gabler, Hans Walter ‘What Ulysses Requires’. Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America. 87 (1993), 187–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabler, Hans Walter ‘The Primacy of the Document in Editing’. Ecdotica. 4 (2007), 197–207.Google Scholar
Gabler, Hans Walter ‘Theorizing the Digital Scholarly Edition’. Literature Compass. 7.2 (2010), 43–56.Google Scholar
Gabler, Hans Walter ‘Thoughts on Scholarly Editing: A Review Article Occasioned by Paul Eggert, Securing the Past: Conservation in Art, Architecture and Literature’. JLTonline. 3 March 2011. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0222–001542. Accessed 15 April 2018.Google Scholar
Gabler, Hans Walter ‘Beyond Author-Centricity in Scholarly Editing’. Journal of Early Modern Studies. 1 (2012), 15–35.Google Scholar
Gabler, Hans Walter ‘Digital Challenges to Scholarly Editing: Networking a Digital Scholarly Edition’. Conference Paper. Key Ideas and Concepts of Digital Humanities Conference. Darmstadt University. 26–28 October 2015.Google Scholar
Gabler, Hans Walter ‘The Draft Manuscript As Material Foundation for Genetic Editing and Genetic Criticism’. Variants: Journal of the European Society for Textual Scholarship. 12 (2016), 135–45.Google Scholar
Gabler, Hans Walter ‘Sourcing and Editing Shakespeare: The Bibliographical Fallacy’. In Gabler, Hans Walter. Text Genetics in Literary Modernism and Other Essays. E-book. Chapter 9. N.p., UK: OpenBook Publishers, 2018.Google Scholar
Gabler, Hans Walter Text Genetics in Literary Modernism and Other Essays. E-book. N.p., UK: OpenBook Publishers, 2018.Google Scholar
Gallop, Jane. ‘The Historicization of Literary Studies and the Fate of Close Reading’. Profession. (2007), 181–6.Google Scholar
Gaskill, Nicholas. ‘The Close and the Concrete’. New Literary History. 47 (2016), 505–24.Google Scholar
Gibson, William M. ‘The Center for Editions of American Authors’. In [Modern Language Association of America]. Professional Standards and American Editions: A Response to Edmund Wilson. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1969.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Mary. Collected Verse. Ed. Strauss, Jennifer. 2 vols. The Academy Editions of Australian Literature. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 2005, 2007.Google Scholar
Goehr, Lydia. The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: An Essay in the Philosophy of Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
[Goethe, Johann Wolfgang]. FaustEdition. Ed. Bohnenkamp, Anne, Henke, Silke and Jannidis, Fotis. 2016. www.faustedition.net. Accessed 29 July 2017.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. ‘General Introduction’. In The Norton Shakespeare. Third Edition. Ed. Greenblatt, Stephen, Cohen, Walter, Howard, Jean E., Maus, Katharine Eisaman, McMullan, Gordon and Gossett, Suzanne. New York: Norton, 2016. Pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. ‘King Lear’ [Introduction]. Ed. Ioppolo, Grace. In The Norton Shakespeare. Third Edition. Gen. Ed. Greenblatt, Stephen, Cohen, Walter, Howard, Jean E., Maus, Katharine Eisaman, McMullan, Gordon and Gossett, Suzanne. New York: Norton, 2016. Pp. 2317–26.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W. ‘The Rationale of Copy-Text’. Studies in Bibliography. 3 (1950–1), 19–36.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W. ‘Bibliography – An Apologia’. In Greg, W. W.. Collected Papers. Ed. Maxwell, J. C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew. ‘Maximal and Minimal Texts: Shakespeare v. the Globe’. Shakespeare Survey. 52 (1999), 68–87.Google Scholar
Halsband, Robert. ‘Editing the Letters of Letter-Writers’. Studies in Bibliography. 11 (1958), 25–37.Google Scholar
Hammer, Langdon. ‘Fantastic Forms’. PMLA. 132 (2017), 1200–5.Google Scholar
Hardy, Thomas. Tess of the D’Urbervilles. Ed. Grindle, Juliet and Gattrell, Simon. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Hardy, Thomas. Tess of the D’Urbervilles. Ed. Dolin, Tim. London: Penguin, 1998.Google Scholar
[Harpur, Charles]. The Charles Harpur Critical Archive. Ed. Eggert, Paul. Digital archivist Meredith Sherlock. Technical designer and programmer Desmond Schmidt. 2019. www.charles-harpur.org. Accessed 1 January 2019.Google Scholar
Harpur, Charles. The Bushrangers: A Play in Five Acts, and Other Poems. Sydney: W. R. Piddington, 1853.Google Scholar
Harpur, Charles. Charles Harpur. Ed. Mitchell, Adrian. Melbourne: Sun Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Harpur, Charles. The Poetical Works of Charles Harpur. Ed. Perkins, Elizabeth. Sydney: Angus & Robertson, 1984.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. ‘Translating Media: Why We Should Rethink Textuality’. Yale Journal of Criticism. 16.2 (2003), 263–90.Google Scholar
Hemingway, Ernest. The Letters of Ernest Hemingway. Vol. 1. Ed. Spanier, Sandra and Trogdon, Robert W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Heseltine, H. P. ‘Australian Image: (1) The Literary Heritage’. Meanjin. 21 (1962), 35–49.Google Scholar
Heseltine, H. P. The Uncertain Self: Essays in Australian Literature and Criticism. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth and Perkins, Elizabeth. The Poems of Charles Harpur in Manuscript in the Mitchell Library and in Publication in the Nineteenth Century: An Analytical Finding List. Canberra: Australian Scholarly Editions Centre, 2002.Google Scholar
Hook, Adam. Selling Shakespeare: Biography, Bibliography and the Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Howard-Hill, Trevor. ‘“Nor Stage, nor Stationers Stall Can Showe”: The Circulation of Plays in Manuscript in the Early Seventeenth Century’. Book History. 2 (1999), 28–41.Google Scholar
Huitfeldt, Claus. ‘Philosophy Case Study’. In Electronic Textual Editing. Ed. Burnard, Lou, O’Brien O’Keeffe, Katherine and Unsworth, John. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2006. Pp. 181–96.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. 2nd edn. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Iida, Takeo, ed. The Reception of D. H. Lawrence around the World. Fukuoka, Japan: Kyushu University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report. 1997, rev. February 2009. www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf. Accessed 4 September 2017.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. ‘The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach’ (1972). In Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. Ed. Lodge, David. London: Longman, 1988. Pp. 212–28.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Complete Letters of Henry James, 1855–1872. Ed. Walker, Pierre A. and Zacharias, Greg W.. 2 vols. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2006.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Ambassadors. Ed. Bradbury, Nicola. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Jannidis, Fotis. ‘Digital Editions in the Net: Perspectives for Scholarly Editing in a Digital World’. In Beyond the Screen: Transformations of Literary Structures, Interfaces and Genre. Ed. Schäfer, Jörgen and Gendolla, Peter. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2010. Pp. 543–60.Google Scholar
Jockers, Matthew L. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. ‘Notes on Shakespeare’s Plays’. In Johnson on Shakespeare. Ed. Sherbo, Arthur. The Yale Edition of the Works of Samuel Johnson. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1968. Vols. 7–8, vii.117–viii.1050.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. ‘Preface’. In Johnson on Shakespeare. Ed. Sherbo, Arthur. The Yale Edition of the Works of Samuel Johnson. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1968. Vol. 7, pp. 59–113.Google Scholar
Jones, Ian. Ned Kelly: A Short Life. Port Melbourne, Vic.: Lothian, 1995.Google Scholar
Jones, Ian. Ned: The Exhibition: Old Melbourne Gaol 2001–2002. Pimlico, Qld: NCS Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar
Josipovici, Gabriel. ‘“But time will not relent”: Modern Literature and the Experience of Time’. In The Modern English Novel: The Reader, the Writer and the Work. Ed. Josipovici, Gabriel. London: Open Books, 1976. Pp. 252–72.Google Scholar
Joyce, James. Ulysses: A Critical and Synoptic Edition. Ed. Gabler, Hans Walter. 3 vols. New York: Garland, 1984.Google Scholar
Kelemen, Erick. Textual Editing and Criticism: An Introduction. New York: Norton, 2009.Google Scholar
Kelly, Edward. The Jerilderie Letter. Ed. McDermott, Alex. Melbourne: Text Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar
Keramidas, Kimon. Interface Experience: A User’s Guide. New York: Bard Graduate Center, 2015.Google Scholar
Kidd, John. ‘An Inquiry into Ulysses: The Corrected Text’. Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America. 82 (1988), 411–584.Google Scholar
Kidd, John. ‘The Scandal of Ulysses’. New York Review of Books. 30 (June 1988), 32–9.Google Scholar
Kirby, William. Le Chien d’or/ The Golden Dog. Ed. Edwards, Mary Jane. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kirschenbaum, Matthew. Track Changes: A Literary History of Word Processing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Koopmann, Helmut. ‘Für eine argumentative Edition’. In Edition et manuscrits. Probleme der Prosa-Edition. Ed. Werner, Michael and Woesler, Winfried. Bern: Lang, 1987. Pp. 45–57.Google Scholar
[Langland, William]. The Piers Plowman Electronic Archive. Vol. 9: The B-Version Archetype. Ed. Burrow, John and Turville-Petre, Thorlac. SEENET. Series A. 12 (2014). http://piers.chass.ncsu.edu/texts/Bx. Accessed 24 March 2018.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. ‘Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam: From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern’. Critical Inquiry. 30 (2004), 225–48.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. The Collected Poems of D. H. Lawrence. London: Martin Secker, 1928.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. The Letters of D. H. Lawrence. Ed. Huxley, Aldous. London: Heinemann, 1932.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. The Collected Letters of D. H. Lawrence. Ed. Moore, Harry T.. 2 vols. London: Heinemann, 1962.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. The Letters of D. H. Lawrence. Gen. Ed. Boulton, James T.. 8 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979–2000.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. Letters of D. H. Lawrence: June 1913–October 1916. Vol. 2. Ed. Zytaruk, George J. and Boulton, James T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. The Prussian Officer and Other Stories. Ed. Worthen, John. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of D. H. Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. Reflections on the Death of a Porcupine. Ed. Herbert, Michael. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of D. H. Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. Women in Love. Ed. Farmer, David, Vasey, Lindeth and Worthen, John. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of D. H. Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. The Rainbow. Ed. Kinkead-Weekes, Mark. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of D. H. Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. England, My England and Other Stories. Ed. Steele, Bruce. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of D. H. Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. The Vicar’s Garden and Other Stories. Ed. Reeve, N. H.. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Lawrence, D. H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2009.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. The Poems. 3 vols. Ed. Pollnitz, Christopher. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of D. H. Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 2018.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. and Skinner, M. L.. The Boy in the Bush. Ed. Eggert, Paul. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of D. H. Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. ‘The Responsible Critic: Or the Function of Criticism at Any Time’. Scrutiny. 19 (1952–3), 162–83.Google Scholar
Lee, Jack, director. Robbery under Arms. Film. UK: Rank, 1957.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary. Hamlet after Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text. Pittsburgh: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. ‘Reading for the Common Good: Formalism and Politics’. Victorian Studies Conference: ‘Aesthetics and Form in Victorian Art, Literature and Culture’. Loyola University Chicago, 28 October 2017.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. ‘Three Unresolved Debates’. PMLA. 132 (2017), 1239–43.Google Scholar
Love, Harold. Scribal Publication in Seventeenth Century England. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Love, Harold. ‘Early Modern Print Culture: Assessing the Models’, Parergon. 20.1 (2003), 45–64.Google Scholar
Lyon, Napier. ‘Mostly about Ourselves’. Sydney Mail. 15 August 1923, p. 40.Google Scholar
Mailloux, Steven. Interpretive Conventions: The Reader in the Study of American Fiction. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Maine, G. F. ‘Introduction’. In Boldrewood, Rolf. Robbery under Arms. London: Collins, 1954.Google Scholar
Manoff, Marlen. ‘Theories of the Archive from across the Disciplines’. Portal: Libraries and the Academy. 4.1 (2005), 9–25.Google Scholar
Mays, J. C. C. ‘Reflections on Having Edited Coleridge’s Poems’. In Romantic Revisions. Ed. Brinkley, Robert and Hanley, Keith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
[McCarthy, Justin]. Our Book of Memories: Letters of Justin McCarthy to Mrs. Campbell Praed. Ed. Praed, Rosa. London: Chatto & Windus, 1912.Google Scholar
McDonald, Brian. Kellyana: A Bibliographical Look at the Ned Kelly Legend. Glenrowan, Vic.: Kate’s Cottage, n.d. Reprinted from Fellows of the Book: A Volume of Essays Commemorating the 50th Anniversary of Biblionews. Ed. Brian Taylor. Sydney: Book Collectors’ Society of Australia, 2000.Google Scholar
McFarlane, Brian, Mayer, Geoff and Bertrand., Ina Oxford Companion to Australian Film. South Melbourne, Vic.: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome. Critique of Modern Textual Criticism. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome. The Textual Condition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome. A New Republic of Letters: Memory and Scholarship in the Age of Digital Reproduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome, ed. Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. ‘Printers of the Mind: Some Notes on Bibliographical Theories and Printing-House Practices’. Studies in Bibliography. 22 (1969), 1–75.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. ‘Typography and Meaning: The Case of William Congreve’ (1981). In McKenzie, D. F.. Making Meaning: ‘Printers of the Mind’ and Other Essays. Ed. McDonald, Peter D. and Suarez, Michael F.. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2002.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. ‘The Sociology of a Text: Orality, Literacy and Print in Early New Zealand’. The Library. 6th series. 6 (1984), 333–65.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts: The Panizzi Lectures 1985. London: British Library, 1986.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. ‘What’s Past Is Prologue’: The Bibliographical Society and the History of the Book. The Bibliographical Society Centenary Lecture. 14 July 1992. Privately published. London: Bibliographical Society, 1993.Google Scholar
McKerrow, R. B. Prolegomena for the Oxford Shakespeare: A Study in Editorial Method. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, Tim. ‘Bridging the Gap’. Jahrbuch für Computerphilologie. 10 (2008). http://computerphilologie.tu-darmstadt.de/jg08/mclough.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2017.Google Scholar
McMullan, Gordon and Gossett, Suzanne. ‘General Textual Introduction’. In The Norton Shakespeare. Third Edition. Gen. Ed. Greenblatt, Stephen, Cohen, Walter, Howard, Jean E., Maus, Katharine Eisaman, McMullan, Gordon and Gossett, Suzanne. New York: Norton, 2016. Pp. 75–92.Google Scholar
McQuilton, John. The Kelly Outbreak 1878–1880: The Geographical Dimension of Social Banditry. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Modern Language Association. PMLA: Special Topic: The History of the Book and the Idea of Literature. Ed. Leah Price. PMLA. 121.1 (2006).Google Scholar
Mole, Tom. What the Victorians Made of Romanticism: Material Artifacts, Cultural Practices and Reception History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History London: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Distant Reading. London: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Patterns and Interpretation. Literary Lab Pamphlet 15. Stanford, CA: Literary Lab, 2017.Google Scholar
Morsia, Elliott. ‘A Genetic Study of “The Shades of Spring”’. Journal of D. H. Lawrence Studies. 3.3 (2014), 153–78.Google Scholar
Neville, Sarah. ‘Nihil biblicum a me alienum puto: W. W. Greg, Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts’. Variants: Journal of the European Society for Textual Scholarship. 11 (2014), 91–112.Google Scholar
Niles, John D. ‘Orality’. In The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship. Ed. Fraistat, Neil and Flanders, Julia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Osborne, Roger. ‘For Art and Money: A Textual History and Scholarly Edition of Joseph Conrad’s Under Western Eyes’. Unpubl. PhD thesis. Canberra: University of New South Wales, 2000.Google Scholar
Palmer, Vance. The Legend of the Nineties. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Ed. Burks, A. W., Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P.. 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931–58.Google Scholar
Perkins, Elizabeth, ed. Supplement to ‘The Poetical Works of Charles Harpur’. Townsville, Qld: Department of English, James Cook University, [1984].Google Scholar
Phillips, A. A. The Australian Tradition. Melbourne: F. W. Cheshire, 1958.Google Scholar
Pierazzo, Elena. ‘A Rationale of Digital Documentary Editions’. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 26.4 (2011), 463–78.Google Scholar
Pierazzo, Elena. Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories, Models and Methods. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Pierce, Peter. ‘“Weary with Travelling through Realms of Air…”: Romance Fiction of “Boldrewood”, Haggard, Wells and Praed’. Westerly. 32 (1987), 79–90.Google Scholar
Piper, Andrew. Book Was There. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Price, Kenneth M. ‘Edition, Project, Database, Archive, Thematic Research Collection: What’s in a Name?’ Digital Humanities Quarterly. 3.3 (2009). www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/3/000053/000053.html. Accessed 29 July 2017.Google Scholar
Price, Kingsley. ‘What Is a Piece of Music?’ British Journal of Aesthetics. 22.4 (1982), 322–36.Google Scholar
Price, Leah. How To Do Things with Books in Victorian Britain. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Reiman, Donald H. Romantic Texts and Contexts. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Reiman, Donald H. The Study of Modern Manuscripts: Public, Confidential and Private. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Roberts, Warren and Poplawski, Paul. A Bibliography of D. H. Lawrence. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Robinson, Peter. ‘The Concept of the Work in the Digital Age’. Ecdotica. 10 (2013), 13–42.Google Scholar
Robinson, Peter. ‘SDSE 2013: Why Digital Humanists Should Get Out of Textual Scholarship’. www.academia.edu/4124828/SDSE_2013_why_digital_humanists_should_get_out_of_textual_scholarship. Accessed 1 November 2018.Google Scholar
Robinson, Peter. ‘Towards a Theory of Digital Editions’. Variants: Journal of the European Society for Textual Scholarship. 10 (2013), 105–31.Google Scholar
Robinson, Peter. ‘Social Editions, Social Editing, Social Texts’. In Beyond Accessibility: Textual Studies in the 21st Century. Ed. Richard Cunningham and Brent Nelson. Digital Studies/Le champ numérique special issue. [Canada]: 2016. www.digitalstudies.org/ojs/index.php/digital_studies/article/view/350. Accessed 27 July 2017.Google Scholar
Robinson, Peter with Solopova, E.. ‘Guidelines for the Transcription of the Manuscripts of the “Wife of Bath’s Prologue”’. In Canterbury Tales Project Occasional Papers 1. Ed. Blake, N. F. and Robinson, P. M.. Oxford: Office for Humanities Communication, 1993.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Louise M. The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. 1978. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Rossetti, D. G. ‘The Stealthy School of Criticism’. Athenaeum. Issue 2303 (July–December 1871 Part II), 792–4. www.rossettiarchive.org/docs/ap4.a85.1871b.rad.html. Accessed 15 August 2017.Google Scholar
Sahle, Patrick. ‘Digitalis Archiv – Digitale Edition: Anmerkungen zur Begriffsklärung’. In Literatur und Literaturwissenschaft auf dem Weg zu den neuen Medien: Eine Standortbestimmung. Ed. Stolz, Michael, Gisi, Lucas Marco and Loop, Jan. Zürich: Germanistik.ch, 2007.Google Scholar
Sahle, Patrick. A Catalog of Digital Scholarly Editions. 2008. www.digitale-edition.de. Accessed 29 July 2017.Google Scholar
Sahle, Patrick. ‘Zwischen Mediengebundenheit und Transmedialisierung: Anmerkungen zum Verhältnis von Edition und Medien’. Editio. 24 (2010), 23–36.Google Scholar
Sahle, Patrick. ‘What Is a Scholarly Digital Edition?’ In Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories and Practices. Ed. Driscoll, Matthew James and Pierazzo, Elena. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2016. Pp. 19–39.Google Scholar
Salamos, Makis. ‘Editorial: Agostino Di Scipio: Audible Ecosystems’, Contemporary Music Review. 33.1 (2014), 2–3.Google Scholar
Sanders, Julie. Adaptation and Appropriation. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Scheirer, Walter, Forstall, Christopher and Coffee, Neil. ‘The Sense of a Connection: Automatic Tracing of Intertextuality by Meaning’. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. 31.1 (2016), 204–17.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Desmond. ‘Towards an Interoperable Digital Scholarly Edition’. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative. 7 (2014). DOI 10.4000/jtei.979. http://jtei.revues.org/979. Accessed 29 July 2014.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Desmond. ‘Searching Historical Texts Is Broken’. Digital Variants (blog). 17 November 2015. https://digitalvariants.blogspot.com/2015/11/whats-wrong-with-search.html. Accessed 8 August 2018.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Desmond and Eggert, Paul. ‘The Charles Harpur Critical Archive: A History and Technical Report’. International Journal of Digital Humanities. 1.2 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s42803-019-00021-9Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert. Protocols of Reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Seal, Graham. The Outlaw Legend: A Cultural Tradition in Britain, America and Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Plays of William Shakespeare. Ed. Johnson, Samuel and Steevens, George. 8 vols. London, 1765.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Arden Shakespeare, 2nd ser. Ed. Jenkins, Harold. London: Methuen, 1982.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Ed. Edwards, Philip. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works. Ed. Wells, Stanley and Taylor, Gary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Three-Text Hamlet: Parallel Texts of the First and Second Quartos and First Folio. Ed. Bertram, Paul and Kliman, Bernice. New York: AMS Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Shakespearean Originals: First Editions [series title]. Ed. Holderness, Graham and Loughrey, Bryan. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. ‘The Enfolded Hamlet’. Ed. Kliman, Bernice. Shakespeare Newsletter. Extra issue (1996), 1–44.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. A Synoptic Hamlet: A Critical-Synoptic Edition of the Second Quarto and First Folio Texts of Hamlet. Ed. Tronch-Pérez, Jesús. Valencia: Sederi, 2002.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Enfolded Hamlets: Parallel Texts of <F1> and {Q2} Each with Unique Elements Bracketed. Ed. Kliman, Bernice. New York: AMS Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet: The Texts of 1603 and 1623. Arden 3rd series. Ed. Thompson, Ann and Taylor, Neil. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2006.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare. Third Edition. Gen. Ed. Greenblatt, Stephen, Cohen, Walter, Howard, Jean E., Maus, Katharine Eisaman, McMullan, Gordon and Gossett, Suzanne. New York: Norton, 2016.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works: Modern Critical Edition. The New Oxford Shakespeare. Gen. Ed. Taylor, Gary, Jowett, John, Bourus, Terri and Egan, Gabriel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works: Critical Reference Edition. The New Oxford Shakespeare. Gen. Ed. Taylor, Gary, Jowett, John, Bourus, Terri and Egan, Gabriel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Complete Poetry of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Vol. 3. Ed. Reiman, Donald H., Fraistat, Neil and Crook, Nora. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Shep, Sydney. ‘At the Crossroads: Book History Meets Digital Humanities’. In Beyond Accessibility: Textual Studies in the 21st Century. Ed. Richard Cunningham and Brent Nelson. Digital Studies/Le champ numérique special issue. [Canada]: 2016. www.digitalstudies.org/ojs/index.php/digital_studies/article/view/353/447. Accessed 3 September 2017.Google Scholar
Shillingsburg, Peter. ‘An Inquiry into the Social Status of Texts and Modes of Textual Criticism’. Studies in Bibliography. 42 (1989), 55–78.Google Scholar
Shillingsburg, Peter. Scholarly Editing in the Computer Age. 3rd edn. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Shillingsburg, Peter. ‘The Semiotics of Bibliography’. Textual Cultures. 6.1 (2011), 11–25.Google Scholar
Shillingsburg, Peter. ‘Development Principles for Virtual Archives and Editions’. Variants: Journal of the European Society for Textual Scholarship. 11 (2014), 11–28.Google Scholar
Shillingsburg, Peter. Textuality and Knowledge: Essays. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Siemens, Ray, Timney, Meagan, Leitch, Cara, Koolen, Corina and Garnett, Alex with the ETCL, INKE and PKP Research Groups. ‘Toward Modeling the Social Edition: An Approach to Understanding the Electronic Scholarly Edition in the Context of New and Emerging Social Media’. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 27.4 (2012), 445–61.Google Scholar
Smith, David R. ‘The Hidden Narrative: The K in Conrad’. In Joseph Conrad’s ‘Under Western Eyes’: Beginnings, Revisions, Final Forms. Ed. Smith, David R.. Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1991.Google Scholar
Smith, Martha Nell. Rowing in Eden: Rereading Emily Dickinson. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sperberg-McQueen, C. M. ‘Textual Criticism and the Text Encoding Initiative’. 1994. www.tei-c.org/Vault/XX/mla94.html. Accessed 29 July 2017.Google Scholar
St Clair, William. The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Stephens, A. G. ‘Australian Literature’. Commonwealth Annual. [1] (1901), 32–6.Google Scholar
Stephens, A. G. ‘Australian Writers (v). T. A. Browne’. Bookfellow. 15 April 1920, p. 1.Google Scholar
Stephensen, P. R. The Foundations of Culture in Australia: An Essay towards National Self-Respect. Gordon, NSW: W. J. Miles, 1936.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Kathryn. ‘Looking and Knowing: Textual Encounters of a Postponed Kind’. In Beyond the Book: Theory, Culture and the Politics of Cyberspace. Ed. Chernaik, Warren, Deegan, Marilyn and Gibson, Andrew. Oxford, UK: Office for Humanities Communication, 1996. Pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
[Tait, Charles, director]. The Story of the Kelly Gang. Reconstruction of 1906 film. DVD. Richmond, Vic.: Madman Entertainment, 2007.Google Scholar
Tanselle, G. Thomas. A Rationale of Textual Criticism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. ‘The Pastness of the Present and the Presence of the Past’. In Text and Act: Essays on Music and Performance. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary. ‘Hamlet’. In William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion. Ed. Wells, Stanley and Taylor, Gary with Jowett, John and Montgomery, William. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. Pp. 396–420.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary and Bourus, Terri. ‘Why Read This Complete Works’. In Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works: Modern Critical Edition. The New Oxford Shakespeare. Gen. Ed. Taylor, Gary, Jowett, John, Bourus, Terri and Egan, Gabriel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Pp. 45–58.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary and Warren, Michael, eds. The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare’s Two Versions of King Lear. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Text Encoding Initiative. TEI P5 Guidelines. www.tei-c.org/Guidelines/P5/. Accessed 28 July 2017.Google Scholar
Theimer, Kate. ‘Archives in Context and As Context’. Journal of Digital Humanities. 1.2 (Spring 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1–2/archives-in-context-and-as-context-by-kate-theimer/. Accessed 17 June 2016.Google Scholar
Thiemeyer, Thomas. ‘Work, Specimen, Witness: How Different Perspectives on Museum Objects Alter the Way They Are Perceived and the Values Attributed to Them’. Museum and Society. 13.3 (2015), 402–18.Google Scholar
Turner, Graeme. ‘Ripping Yarns, Ideology and Robbery under Arms’. Australian Literary Studies. 14 (1989), 239–50.Google Scholar
Vanhoutte, Edward. ‘Every Reader His Own Bibliographer – An Absurdity?’ Text Editing, Print and the Digital World. Ed. Deegan, Marilyn and Sutherland, Kathryn. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2009. Pp. 99–110.Google Scholar
van Hulle, Dirk and Nixon, Mark. ‘Editorial Principles and Practice’. In Samuel Beckett Digital Manuscript Project. Ed. van Hulle, Dirk et al., 2015. www.beckettarchive.org/2-editorial.jsp. Accessed 29 July 2017.Google Scholar
van Hulle, Dirk and Shillingsburg, Peter. ‘Orientations to Text, Revisited’. Studies in Bibliography. 59 (2015), 27–44.Google Scholar
Ward, Russell. The Australian Legend. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Warner, Lawrence. The Lost History of Piers Plowman: The Earliest Transmission of Langland’s Work. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Weber, Thérèse. Outlawed: Rebels, Revolutionaries and Bushrangers. Canberra: National Museum of Australia, 2003.Google Scholar
Weedon, Alexis. ‘From Three-Deckers to Film Rights: A Turn in British Publishing Strategies, 1870–1930’. Book History. 2 (1999), 188–206.Google Scholar
Wellek, René and Warren, Austin. ‘The Mode of Existence of a Literary Work of Art’. In Theory of Literature. London: Cape, 1966. Pp. 142–57.Google Scholar
Werner, Marta. Emily Dickinson’s Open Folios: Scenes of Reading, Surfaces of Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Werstine, Paul. ‘The Textual Mystery of Hamlet’. Shakespeare Quarterly, 39 (1988), 1–26.Google Scholar
Wilkes, G. A. ‘The Eighteen Nineties’ (1958). In Australian Literary Criticism. Ed. Johnston, Grahame. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Williams, Abigail. The Social Life of Books: Reading Together in the Eighteenth-Century Home. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Wood, Sarah. ‘Langlandian Loose Leaves and Lost Histories’. Library. 17 (2016), 371–98.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. [Letter to Clive Bell, 15 April 1908]. In The Flight of the Mind: The Letters of Virginia Woolf. Volume 1: 1888–1912. Ed. Nicolson, Nigel. London: Hogarth Press, 1975. Pp. 324–5.Google Scholar
Yale, Elizabeth. ‘The History of Archives: The State of the Discipline’. Book History. 18 (2015), 332–59.Google Scholar
Yeats, W. B. Last Poems: Manuscript Materials. Ed. Pethica, James. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Zeller, Hans. ‘Record and Interpretation: Analysis and Documentation As Goal and Method of Editing’. In Contemporary German Editorial Theory. Ed. Gabler, Hans Walter, Bornstein, George and Pierce, Gillian Borland. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995. Pp. 17–58.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Paul Eggert, Loyola University, Chicago
  • Book: The Work and the Reader in Literary Studies
  • Online publication: 19 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641012.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Paul Eggert, Loyola University, Chicago
  • Book: The Work and the Reader in Literary Studies
  • Online publication: 19 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641012.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Paul Eggert, Loyola University, Chicago
  • Book: The Work and the Reader in Literary Studies
  • Online publication: 19 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641012.013
Available formats
×