Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:11:54.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2021

Edited by
Frances McCall Rosenbluth  and
Margaret Weir
Frances McCall Rosenbluth
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Margaret Weir
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Who Gets What?
The New Politics of Insecurity
 , pp. 211 - 328
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abrial, Stephanie, Cautres, Bruno, and Mandran, Nadine. 2003. “Turnout and Abstention at Multilevel Elections in France.” Fifth Framework Research Programme (1998–2002): Democratic Participation and Political Communication in Systems of Multi-level Governance. Working paper, Centre d’Informatisation des Donnes Socio-Politiques, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Grenoble.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, and Ayres, Ian. 2008. Voting with Dollars: A New Paradigm for Campaign Finance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Adserà, Alícia, and Boix, Carles. 2002. Trade, democracy, and the size of the public sector: The political underpinnings of openness. International Organization, 56 (2): 229–262.Google Scholar
Andersen, Jorgen G., and Hoff, Jens. 2001. “Electoral Participation.” In Democracy and Citizenship in Scandinavia, edited by Andersen, Jorgen G. and Hoff, Jens, 31–46. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Arntz, Melanie, Gregory, Terry, and Zierahn, Ulrich. 2016. “The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis.” OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no. 189. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Sascha O., Fetzer, Thiemo, and Novy, Dennis. 2017. “Who Voted for Brexit?: A Comprehensive District-Level Analysis.” Economic Policy 32 (92): 601–650.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel. 1988. The End of Ideology (with a new afterword). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blais, Andre, Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Nevitte, Neil. 2004. “Where Does Turnout Decline Come From?” European Journal of Political Research 43 (3): 221–236.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam, McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2013. “Why Hasn’t Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27 (3): 103–123.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2019. Democratic Capitalism at the Crossroads. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cramer, Katherine J. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ivor, Fox, Anthony, and Alt, James. 1977. “Non-voting in British General Elections 1966–October 1974.” In British Political Sociology Yearbook, vol. 3, edited by Crouch, Colin, 38–109. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Cronin, James E., Ross, George W., and Shoch, James, eds. 2011. What’s Left of the Left: Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Rafaela M. 2010. Immigration and Conflict in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Rafaela M. 2017. Dilemmas of Inclusion: The Political Representation of Muslims in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Elsby, Michael W. L., Hobijn, Bart, and Şahin, Ayşegül. 2013. “The Decline of the US Labor Share.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2): 1–63.Google Scholar
European Social Survey (ESS). 2014. European Social Survey Round 7 Data. Data file edition 2.1. NSD (Norwegian Centre for Research Data) Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
Ford, Robert, and Goodwin, Matthew J.. 2014. Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain (Extremism and Democracy). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N., Lyons, Patrick, and Marsh, Michael. 2004. “Generational Basis of Turnout Decline in Established Democracies.” Acta Politica 39 (2): 115–151.Google Scholar
Frey, Carl Benedikt, and Osborne, Michael A.. 2017. “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114: 254–280.Google Scholar
Gest, Justin. 2016. The New Minority. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gingrich, Jane, and Hausermann, Silja. 2015. “The Decline of the Working Class Vote, the Reconfiguration of the Welfare Support Coalition and Consequences for the Welfare State.” Journal of European Social Policy 25 (1): 50–75.Google Scholar
Grosfeld, Irena, and Hashi, Iraj. 2007. “Changes in Ownership Concentration in Mass Privatised Firms: Evidence from Poland and the Czech Republic.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 15 (4): 520–534.Google Scholar
Guellec, Dominique, and Paunov, Carolina. 2017. “Digital Innovation and the Distribution of Income.” NBER Working Paper no. 23987.Google Scholar
Hausermann, Silja. 2017. “Electoral Realignment and Social Policy Positions of Social Democratic Parties.” Working paper, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Häusermann, Silja, and Kriesi, Hanspeter (2015). “What Do Voters Want?” In The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, edited by Beramendi, Pablo, Häusermann, Silja, Kitschelt, Herbert, and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 202–230. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Marc, and Kern, Anna. 2017. “The Tipping Point between Stability and Decline: Trends in Voter Turnout, 1950–1980–2012.” European Political Science 16: 535–552.Google Scholar
Hoschschild, Arlie R. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Jarsulic, Marc, Gurwitz, Ethan, and Schwartz, Andrew. 2019. “Toward a Robust Competition Policy.” Center for American Progress. www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/reports/2019/04/03/467613/toward-robust-competition-policy/Google Scholar
Judis, John B. 2016. The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics. New York: Columbia Global Reports.Google Scholar
Karabarbounis, Loukas, and Neiman, Brent. 2014. “The Global Decline of the Labor Share.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (1): 61–103.Google Scholar
Katz, Lawrence F., and Margo, Robert A.. 2014. “Technical Change and the Relative Demand for Skilled Labor: The United States in Historical Perspective.” In Human Capital in History: The American Record, edited by Boustan, Leah Platt, Frydman, Carola, and Margo, Robert A., 15–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Keating, Michael, and McCrone, David, eds. 2013. The Crisis of European Social Democracy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Rehm, Philipp. 2015. “Party Alignments: Change and Continuity.” In The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, edited by Beramendi, Pablo, Hausermann, Silja, Kitschelt, Herbert, and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 179–201. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kleinhenz, Thomas. 1998. “A New Type of Nonvoter? Turnout Decline in German Elections, 1980–94.” In Stability and Change in German Elections: How Electorates Merge, Converge, or Collide, edited by Anderson, Christopher J. and Zelle, Carsten, 173–198. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Los, Bart, Timmer, Marcel, and deVries, Gaaitzen. 2014. “The Demand for Skills 1995–2008: A Global Supply Chain Perspective.” OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1141. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jz123g0f5lp-enGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Will, Benoit, Kenneth, Mikhaylov, Slava, and Laver, Michael. 2011. “Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (1): 123–155.Google Scholar
Martikainen, Pekka, Martikainen, Tuomo, and Wass, Hanna. 2005. “The Effect of Socioeconomic Factors on Voter Turnout in Finland: A Register-Based Study of 2.9 Million Voters.” European Journal of Political Research 44 (5): 645–669.Google Scholar
Mayer, Nonna. 2009. “What Remains of Class Voting?”, In Politics in France and Europe, edited by Perrineau, Pascal and Rouban, Luc, pp. 167–181. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rennwald, Line, and Evans, Geoffrey. 2014. “When Supply Creates Demand: Social Democratic Party Strategies and the Evolution of Class Voting.” West European Politics 37 (5): 1108–1135.Google Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan. 2019. Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sage, Daniel, and Diamond, Patrick. 2017. “Europe’s New Social Reality: The Case against Universal Basic Income.” Policy Network paper. February.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2001. “Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences over Immigration Policy.” Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (1): 133–145.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J. 2006. “Public Opinion, International Economic Integration, and the Welfare State.” In Globalization and Self- Determination: Is the Nation-State under Siege? edited by Cameron, David R., Ranis, Gustav, and Zinn, Annalisa, 51–94. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tuorto, Dario. 2010. “La partecipazione al voto.” In Votare in Italia, 1968– 2008: Dall’appartenenza alla scelta, edited by Bellucci, Paolo and Segatti, Paolo, 53–79. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Volkens, Andrea, Lehmann, Pola, Regel, Sven, Schultze, Henrike, and Werner, Annika, with Onawa Promise Lacewell. 2012. The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2012a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
Wass, Hanna. 2007. “The Effects of Age, Generation and Period on Turnout in Finland 1975– 2003.” Electoral Studies 26 (3): 648–659.Google Scholar

References

Ahlquist, John S., and Ansell, Ben. 2017. “Taking Credit: Redistribution and Borrowing in an Age of Economic Polarization.” World Politics 69(4): 640–675.Google Scholar
Ansell, Ben J. Broz, Lawrence, and Flaherty, Thomas. 2018. “Global Capital Markets, Housing Prices, and Partisan Fiscal Policies.” Economics & Politics 30(3): 307–339.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, and Rosenbluth, Frances McCall. 2006. “Short versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector.” American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 251–265.Google Scholar
Birney, Mayling, Shapiro, Ian, and Graetz, Michael. 2008. “The elite uses of public opinion: Lessons from the estate tax repeal,” in Shapiro, Ian, Swenson, Peter, and Donno, Daniela, eds, Divide and Deal: The Politics of Distribution in Democracies. New York: New York University Press. 298–340.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles 2019. Democratic Capitalism at the Crossroads: Technological Change and the Future of Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Calmfors, Lars, and Driffill, John. 1988. “Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance.” Economic Policy 3(6): 13–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John, and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas,” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–439.Google Scholar
Hallerberg, Mark, Strauch, Rolf Rainer, and Jurgen, von Hagen. 2009. “The Design of Fiscal Rules and Forms of Governance in European Union Countries,” European Journal of Political Economy 23(2).Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than Others,” The American Political Science Review 100(2): 165–181.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David 2019. Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism through a Turbulent Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Leamer, Edward. 2007. “A Flat World, a Level Playing Field, a Small World After All, or None of the Above? A Review of Thomas L. Friedman’s The World Is Flat,” Journal of Economic Literature. 45: 83–126.Google Scholar
Martin, Lanny W., and Vanberg, Georg. 2011. Parliaments and Coalitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Roland, Gerard, and Tabellini, Guido. 2007. “Electoral Rules and Government Spending in Parliamentary Democracies.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 20: 1–34.Google Scholar
Powell, Bingham G. 2002. “PR, the Median Voter, and Economic Policy: An Exploration,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances McCall, and Shapiro, Ian. 2018. Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2016. Politics against Domination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction.Google Scholar
Warwick, Paul, and Druckman, James N.. 2001. “Portfolio Salience and the Proportionality of Payoffs in Coalition Governments,” British Journal of Political Science 31(4): 627–649.Google Scholar
Williamson, Vanessa, Skocpol, Theda, and Coggin, John. 2011. “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism.” Perspectives on Politics 9(1): 25–43.Google Scholar
Wilson, Harold. 1979. The Final Term: The Labour Government 1974–76. London: Weidenfield & Nicholson.Google Scholar

Works Cited

Adamy, Janet, and Overberg, Paul. 2016. “Places Most Unsettled by Rapid Demographic Change Are Drawn to Donald Trump,” Wall Street Journal, November 1. https://www.wsj.com/articles/places-most-unsettled-by-rapid-demographic-change-go-for-donald-trump-1478010940Google Scholar
Alberta, Tim. 2018. “The Tragedy of Paul Ryan,” Politico, April 12 https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/04/12/how-donald-trump-upended-paul-ryans-plans-217989Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin, Johnson, Martin, Lindstädt, René, Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2016. “The Influence of News Media on Political Elites: Investigating Strategic Responsiveness in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 60(1): 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2016. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands, and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 571–597.Google Scholar
Boushey, Heather, and Vahgul, Kavya. 2016. “Women Have Made the Difference for Family Economic Security.” Washington Center for Equitable Growth Issue Brief. April. Available online at http://cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/04153438/Women-have-made-the-difference-for-family-economic-security-pdf.pdfGoogle Scholar
Chinoy, Sahil. 2019. “What Happened to America’s Political Center of Gravity?” New York Times. June 26. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/26/opinion/sunday/republican-platform-far-right.htmlGoogle Scholar
Clement, Scott, Guskin, Emily, and Tan, Shelly. 2017. “America’s Chaotic, Crazy, Challenging, Great, Tumultuous, Horrible, Disappointing Year: A Look Back at the Ups and Downs of Public Opinion in 2017.” Washington Post, Dec. 15.Google Scholar
Council of Economic Advisers (CEA). 2016. Labor Market Monopsony: Trends, Consequences, and Policy Responses. October. Available online at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/page/files/20161025_monopsony_labor_mrkt_cea.pdfGoogle Scholar
DellaVigna, Stefano, and Kaplan, Ethan. 2007. “The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(3): 1187–1234.Google Scholar
Donachie, Robert. 2018. “McConnell: Last 18 Months under Trump Have Been My ‘Best’ Time in the Senate.” Washington Examiner. September 21. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/mcconnell-last-18-months-under-trump-have-been-my-best-time-in-the-senateGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, Joseph, and Pozen, David E.. 2018. “Asymmetric Constitutional Hardball.” Columbia Law Review 118(3): 915–982.Google Scholar
Frum, David. 2012. “Norquist: Romney Will Do as Told.” Daily Beast. February 13. https://www.thedailybeast.com/norquist-romney-will-do-as-tolddavid-frumGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grullon, Gustavo, Larkin, Yelena, and Michaely, Roni. 2019. “Are U.S. Industries Becoming More Concentrated?” Review of Finance 23(4): 697–743.Google Scholar
Grumbach, Jacob M. 2018. “From Backwaters to Major Policymakers: Policy Polarization in the States, 1970–2014.” Perspectives on Politics 16(2): 416–435.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2008. The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream, rev. and exp. paperback ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2019. The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2015. “Confronting Asymmetric Polarization.” In Solutions to Polarization, ed. Persily, Nathaniel. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul 2016. American Amnesia: How the War on Government Led Us to Forget What Made America Prosper. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul 2018. “The Dog That Almost Barked: What the ACA Repeal Fight Says about the Resilience of the American Welfare State.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 43(4): 551–577.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., Pierson, Paul, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2015. “Drift and Conversion: Hidden Faces of Institutional Change.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. Thelen, Kathleen and Mahoney, James. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., Rehm, Philipp, and Schlesinger, Mark. 2013. “The Insecure American: Economic Experiences, Financial Worries, and Policy Attitudes.” Perspectives on Politics 11(1): 23–49.Google Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2014. “Who Passes Business’s ‘Model Bills’? Policy Capacity and Corporate Influence in U.S. State Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 582–602.Google Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander 2018. Politics at Work: How Companies Turn Their Workers into Lobbyists. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J. 2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review 104(1): 40–60.Google Scholar
Howard, Christopher. 2007. The Welfare State Nobody Knows: Debunking Myths about U.S. Social Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2019. Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism through a Turbulent Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Rosenbluth, Frances McCall. 2011. Women, Work, and Politics: The Political Economy of Gender Inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Lawrence F., and Krueger, Alan B.. 2016. “The Rise and Nature of Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. w22667.Google Scholar
Khan, Lina M. 2016. “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox.” Yale Law Journal 126(3): 710–805.Google Scholar
Kozak, Warren. 2014. “George Wallace 1968 Presidential Campaign,” History on the Net. Available online at www.historyonthenet.com/george-wallace-1968-presidential-campaignGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Didi, and McCarty., Nolan 2015. “Democracy in America.” Global Policy 6(S1): 49–55.Google Scholar
Kuziemko, Ilyana, Norton, Michael I., Saez, Emmanuel, and Stantcheva, Stefanie. 2015. “How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments.” American Economic Review 105(4): 1478–1508.Google Scholar
Lee, Woojin, and Roemer, John E.. 2006. “Racism and Redistribution in the United States: A Solution to the Problem of American Exceptionalism.” Journal of Public Economics 90(6–7): 1027–1052.Google Scholar
Levine, Adam Seth. 2015. American Insecurity: Why Our Economic Fears Lead to Political Inaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012. It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Margalit, Yotam M. 2013. “Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession.” American Political Science Review 107(1): 80–103.Google Scholar
Martin, Gregory J., and Yurukoglu, Ali. 2017. “Bias in Cable News: Persuasion and Polarization.” American Economic Review 107(9): 2565–2599.Google Scholar
Marx, Paul, and Nguyen, Christoph. 2016. “Are the Unemployed Less Politically Involved? A Comparative Study of Internal Political Efficacy.” European Sociological Review 32(5): 634–648.Google Scholar
Mayda, Anna Maria, Peri, Giovanni, and Steingress, Walter. 2018. “The Political Impact of Immigration: Evidence from the United States.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. w24510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2018. “Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(19): E4330–E4339.Google Scholar
Naidu, Suresh, and Posner, Eric A., 2018. “Labor Monopsony and the Limits of the Law.” Working Paper. Columbia University. Available online at https://irs.princeton.edu/sites/irs/files/naidu%20posner%20limits%20of%20law%20conference%20draft.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2012. “Partisan Polarization Surges in Bush, Obama Year – Trends in American Values: 1987–2012.” Available online at www.people-press.org/2012/06/04/partisan-polarization-surges-in-bush-obama-years/Google Scholar
Pew Research Center 2015. “Federal Tax System Seen in Need of Overhaul – Top Complaints: Wealthy, Corporations ‘Don’t Pay Fair Share.’” Available online at www.people-press.org/2015/03/19/federal-tax-system-seen-in-need-of-overhaul/Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Hal, Faris, Robert, and Benkler, Yochai, 2018. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan A. 2019. Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stephanopoulos, Nicholas, and Eric, McGhee. 2015. “Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap.” University of Chicago Law Review 82: 831–900.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit, and Potter, Joshua D.. 2015. “The Effect of Inequality and Social Identity on Party Strategies.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 744–758.Google Scholar
Tax Policy Center. 2017. Distributional Analysis of the Conference Agreement for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Washington, DC: Tax Policy Center, December 18.Google Scholar
Tesler, Michael. 2012. “The Spillover of Racialization into Health Care: How President Obama Polarized Public Opinion by Racial Attitudes and Race.” American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 690–704.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2004. “Constitutional Hardball.” John Marshall Law Review 37: 523–553.Google Scholar
Zulianello, Mattia. 2018. “Anti-System Parties Revisited: Concept Formation and Guidelines for Empirical Research.” Government and Opposition 53(4): 653–681.Google Scholar

References

Bonoli, G. (2005). The politics of the new social policies: Providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states. Policy & Politics, 33(3), 431–449.Google Scholar
Castel, R. (1995). Les metamorphoses de la question sociale. Paris, France: Fayard.Google Scholar
Castel, R.(Ed.). (2017). From manual workers to wage laborers: Transformation of the social question (Boyd, R., Trans. & Ed.). Oxford: Routledge [translated and edited by Richard Boyd; first published 2003 by Transaction Publishers].Google Scholar
Campbell, A. L. 2014. Trapped in America’s safety net: One family’s struggle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chauvel, L. (2016). The intensity and shape of inequality. Review of Income and Wealth, 62(1), 52–68.Google Scholar
Chevalier, T. (2016). Varieties of youth welfare citizenship: Towards a two-dimension typology. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
The Commonwealth Fund. 2013. International Health Policy Survey. www.commonwealthfund.org/series/international-health-policy-surveysGoogle Scholar
Crouch, C. 2009. “Privatised Keynesianism: An unacknowledged policy regime.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 11(3), 382–399.Google Scholar
Davis, G. F. (2015). Corporate power in the twenty-first century. In Rangan, S. (Ed.), Performance and progress: Essays on capitalism, business, and society, pp. 395–414. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Draut, T. (2005). The plastic safety net: The reality behind debt in America. New York: Demos and the Center for Responsible Lending.Google Scholar
ECRI. 2015. Statistical package. Brussels: European Credit Research Institute.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe, Margarita. 2008. Welfare and capitalism in Postwar Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Maria. 2009. Consumer Bankruptcy Regimes and Credit Default in the US and Europe: A Comparative Study. CEPS Working Document No. 318/July.Google Scholar
Gordon, Andrew. 2017. New and enduring dual structures of employment in Japan: The rise of non-regular labor, 1980s–2010s. Social Science Japan Journal 20(1), 9–36.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98, 243–260.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S.(2006). The great risk shift: The assault on American jobs, families, health care, and retirement and how you can fight back. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S.(2011). The foundations of middle-class democracy. In Priorities for a new political economy: Memos to the left, pp. 33–38. London: Policy Network.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S.(2013). Pre-distribution: Rebuilding the organizational foundations of democratic capitalism. In Cramme, O. (Ed.), Progressive politics after the crash: Governing from the left, pp. 117–130. London: Policy Network.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, D. W. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Häusermann, S., Kurer, T., and Schwander, H. (2015). High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences.” Socio-Economic Review 13(2): 235–258.Google Scholar
Himmelstein, D. U., Thorne, D., Warren, E., and Woolhandler, S. (2009). Medical bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: Results of a national study. The American Journal of Medicine 122, 741–746.Google Scholar
ILO. 2017. ILOSTAT Statistical Database. https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund. (2012). World economic outlook: Growth resuming, dangers remain. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation. (2019). The Uninsured and the ACA: A Primer. San Francisco: The Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L. (2013). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kelly, N. (2008). The politics of income inequality in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michener, J. 2018. Fragmented democracy: Medicaid, federalism, and unequal politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montgomerie, J. (2013). America’s debt safety-net. Public Administration 91(4), 871–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morduch, J., and Schneider, R. (2017). The financial diaries: How American families cope in a world of uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, K. S. (2006). Chutes and ladders: Navigating the low-wage labor market. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
OECD. (2002). Employment Outlook 2002. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. (2015). Economic policy reforms 2015: Going for growth. Paris. OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. (2017a). Employment database. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. (2017b). Job quality database. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. (2017c). National accounts. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. (2018a). Health statistics. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. (2018b). Income distribution database. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Oesch, D. (2006). Coming to grips with a changing class structure: An analysis of employment stratification in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. International Sociology 21(2): 263–288.Google Scholar
Palier, B., (Ed.). (2010). A long goodbye to Bismarck? The politics of welfare reform in continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Palier, B., and Thelen, K. (2012). Dualization and institutional complementarities: Industrial relations, labor market and welfare state changes in France and Germany. In Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M (Eds.), The age of dualization: The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies, pp. 201–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179.Google Scholar
Porter, K. (Ed.). (2012). Broke: How debt bankrupts the middle class. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ranci, C. (2010). Social vulnerability in Europe: The new configuration of social risks. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rovny, A. E., and Rovny, J. (2017). Outsiders at the ballot box: Operationalizations and political consequences of the insider–outsider dualism. Socio-Economic Review, 15(1), 161–185.Google Scholar
Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The dangerous new class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2019). The American precariat: U.S. capitalism in comparative perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 17(1), 5–27.Google Scholar
US Census. (2018). Health insurance coverage in the United States: 2017. Report Number P60-264. www.census.gov/library/publications/2018/demo/p60-264.html#:~:text=The%20percentage%20of%20people%20with,million%2C%20up%20to%20294.6%20millionGoogle Scholar
Warren, E., and Tyagi, A. W. (2003). The two-income trap: Why middle-class mothers and fathers are going broke. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weil, D. (2014). The fissured workplace: Why work became so many and what can be done to improve it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, A. (2021). Indebted Societies: Credit and Welfare in Rich Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Ananat, Elizabeth Oltmans, Francis, Dania V., Gassman-Pines, Anna, and Gibson-Davis, Christina M.. 2013. “Children left behind: The effects of statewide job loss on student achievement.” NBER Working Paper No. 17104.Google Scholar
Ananat, Elizabeth Oltmans, and Gassman-Pines, Anna. 2020. “Work schedule unpredictability: Daily occurrence and effects on working parents’ well-being.” Journal of Marriage and Family. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12696Google Scholar
Ananat, Elizabeth Oltmans, Gassman-Pines, Anna, Barton, Hayley, Becker, Katie, Frances, Tamara, Rappleye, Rob, Rickert, Tim, and Suhail, Maria. 2017. Where does the money go? Federal spending on young American children. Durham, NC: Duke Center for Child and Family Policy.Google Scholar
Ananat, Elizabeth O., Gassman-Pines, Anna, and Fitz-Henley, John II. 2019. “The effects of the Emeryville Fair Workweek Ordinance on the daily lives of low-wage workers and their families.” Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Arora, Kanika, and Wolf, Douglas A.. 2018. “Does paid family leave reduce nursing home use? The California experience.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 37 (1):38–62.Google Scholar
Autor, David, Dorn, David, and Hanson, Gordon. 2017. When work disappears: Manufacturing decline and the falling marriage-market value of men. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Bania, Neil, and Leete, Laura. 2009. “Monthly household income volatility in the US, 1991/92 vs. 2002/03.” Economics Bulletin 29 (3):2100–2112.Google Scholar
Berger, Lawrence M., Hill, Jennifer, and Waldfogel, Jane. 2005. “Maternity leave, early maternal employment and child health and development in the US.” The Economic Journal 115 (501):F29–F47.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, Annette, Batt, Rosemary, Houseman, Susan N., and Appelbaum, Eileen. 2016. “Domestic outsourcing in the United States: A research agenda to assess trends and effects on job quality.” Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 16-253. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2016. Employee tenure in 2016. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics 2018a. Employee benefits in the United States – March 2018. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics 2018b. Employment projections – 2016–26. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics 2018c. Occupational outlook handbook.Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U. Department of Labor. www.bls.gov/ooh/home.htmGoogle Scholar
Carnevale, Anthony P., Smith, Nicole, Melton, Michelle, and Price, Eric W.. 2015. Learning while earning: The new normal. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.Google Scholar
Charles, Kerwin Kofi, Hurst, Erik, and Schwartz, Mariel. 2018. “The transformation of manufacturing and the decline in US employment.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2018, vol. 33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chien, Nina. 2015. “Estimates of child care eligibility and receipt for fiscal year 2012.” ASPE Issue Brief., Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation and Office of Human Services Policy, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Dey, Matthew, Houseman, Susan N., and Polivka, Anne E.. 2012. “Manufacturers’ outsourcing to staffing services.” ILR Review 65 (3):533–559.Google Scholar
Dey, Matthew, Houseman, Susan N., and Polivka, Anne E. 2017. “Manufacturers’ outsourcing to temporary help services: A research update.” US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Working Paper 493.Google Scholar
Dynan, Karen, Elmendorf, Douglas, and Sichel, Daniel. 2012. “The evolution of household income volatility.” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 12 (2).Google Scholar
Ettner, Susan L. 1995. “The impact of ‘parent care’ on female labor supply decisions.” Demography 32 (1):63–80.Google Scholar
Fahle, Sean, and McGarry., Kathleen 2017. “Women working longer: Labor market implications of providing family care.” In Women Working Longer: Increased Employment at Older Ages, Goldin, Claudia and Katz, Lawrence F., eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Farber, Henry S., Herbst, Daniel, Kuziemko, Ilyana, and Naidu, Suresh. 2018. Unions and inequality over the twentieth century: New evidence from survey data. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Feler, Leo, and Senses, Mine Z.. 2017. “Trade shocks and the provision of local public goods.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 9 (4):101–143.Google Scholar
Fort, Teresa C., Pierce, Justin R., and Schott, Peter K.. 2018. “New perspectives on the decline of US manufacturing employment.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 32 (2):47–72.Google Scholar
Fraga, Lynette M., Dobbins, Dionne R., Draper, Fitzgerald, and Michelle, McCready. 2017. Parents and the high cost of child care: 2017 report. Arlington, VA: Child Care Aware of America.Google Scholar
Gassman-Pines, Anna. 2011. “Low-income mothers’ nighttime and weekend work: Daily associations with child behavior, mother-child interactions and mood.” Family Relations 60:15–29. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00630.xGoogle Scholar
Gassman-Pines, Anna, Gibson-Davis, Christina M., and Ananat, Elizabeth Oltmans. 2015. “How economic downturns affect child development: An interdisciplinary perspective on pathways of influence.” Child Development Perspectives 9:233–238.Google Scholar
Gennetian, Lisa A., Rodrigues, Christopher, Hill, Heather D., and Morris, Pamela A.. 2018. “Income level and volatility by children’s race and Hispanic ethnicity.” Journal of Marriage and Family 81 (1):204–229.Google Scholar
Genworth. 2018. “Cost of care survey 2018.” www.genworth.com/aging-and-you/finances/cost-of-care.htmlGoogle Scholar
Glynn, Sarah Jane, and Corley, Danielle. 2016. The cost of work-family policy inaction. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Peter, and Moffitt, Robert. 2009. “The rising instability of US earnings.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (4):3–24.Google Scholar
Hagen, Stuart A. 2013. Rising demand for long-term services and supports for elderly people. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.Google Scholar
Hardy, Bradley L. 2012. “Black female earnings and income volatility.” The Review of Black Political Economy 39 (4):465–475.Google Scholar
Hardy, Bradley L. 2017. “Income instability and the response of the safety net.” Contemporary Economic Policy 35 (2):312–330.Google Scholar
Henly, Julia R., and Lambert, Susan J.. 2014. “Unpredictable work timing in retail jobs: Implications for employee work-life conflict.” ILR Review 67 (3):986–1016.Google Scholar
Henly, Julia R., Shaefer, H. L., and Waxman, E.. 2006. “Nonstandard work schedules: Employer- and employee-driven flexibility in retail jobs.” Social Service Review 80 (4):609–634.Google Scholar
Hill, Heather D. 2018. “Trends and divergences in childhood income dynamics, 1970–2010.” In Advances in child development and behavior, Benson, Janette B., ed., 179–213. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Julia M., Parker, Kim, Graf, Nikki, and Livington, Gretchen. 2017. Americans widely support paid family and medical leave, but differ over specific policies. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Elisabeth, and Hacker, Jacob. 2008. The rising instability of American family incomes, 1969–2004. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2017. Paid family leave and sick days in the U.S.: Findings from the 2017 Kaiser/HRET Employer Health Benefits Survey. San Francisco, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
Kaye, H. Stephen, Harrington, Charlene, and LaPlante, Mitchell P.. 2010. “Long-term care: Who gets it, who provides it, who pays, and how much?” Health Affairs 29 (1):11–21.Google Scholar
Knop, Brian. 2017. “Parents working nonstandard schedules: Who’s burning the midnight (and weekend) oil?” Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Orlando, FL. www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2017/demo/ncfr-poster.pdfGoogle Scholar
Koo, Kyong Hyun. 2016. “The evolution of earnings volatility during and after the Great Recession.” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 55 (4):705–732.Google Scholar
Kull, Steven, Ramsay, Clay, Lewis, Evan, and Williams, Antje. 2017. Americans on federal poverty programs. College Park, MD: Program for Public Consultation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Lambert, Susan J., Fugiel, Peter J., and Henly, Julia R.. 2014. “Precarious work schedules among early-career employees in the US: A national snapshot.” Research Brief. Chicago: University of Chicago, Employment Instability, Family Well-Being, and Social Policy Network (EINet).Google Scholar
Laughlin, L. 2013. “Who’s minding the kids? Child care arrangements: Spring 2011.” Current Population Reports, P70–135. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Maestas, Nicole. 2018. The return to work and women’s employment decisions. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Maestas, Nicole, Messel, Matt, and Truskinovsky, Yulya. 2020. “Caregiving and Labor force participation: New evidence from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.” (No. WI20-12). Madison, WI: Center for Financial Security University of Wisconsin Madison Retirement and Disability Research Center.Google Scholar
Medeiros, Melissa. 2014. “Barriers to maintaining child care coverage: an analysis of states’ child care subsidy policies.” Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Public Policy, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Robert A., and Zhang, Sisi. 2018. Income volatility and the PSID: Past research and new results. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Mommaerts, Corina. 2016. “Long-term care insurance and the family.” Unpublished, November. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Monte, Lindsay M., and Ellis, Renee R.. 2014. Fertility of women in the United States: 2012. In Population Characteristics. Washington, DC: Census Bureau, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Monto, Arnold S., Malosh, Ryan E., Petrie, Joshua G., Thompson, Mark G., and Ohmit, Suzanne E.. 2014. “Frequency of acute respiratory illnesses and circulation of respiratory viruses in households with children over 3 surveillance seasons.” The Journal of infectious diseases 210 (11):1792–1799. DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiu327Google Scholar
Morduch, Jonathan, and Siwicki, Julie. 2017. “In and out of poverty: Episodic poverty and income volatility in the US financial diaries.” Social Service Review 91 (3):390–421.Google Scholar
Morduch, Jonathan, and Schneider, Rachel. 2017. The financial diaries: How American families cope in a world of uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
National Survey of Early Care and Education Project Team. 2015. Fact sheet: Provision of early care and education during non-standard hours. (OPRE Report No. 2015–44). Washington, DC: Office of Planning Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Rossin‐Slater, Maya, Ruhm, Christopher J., and Waldfogel, Jane. 2013. “The effects of California’s paid family leave program on mothers’ leave‐taking and subsequent labor market outcomes.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 32 (2):224–245.Google Scholar
Ruhm, Christopher J. 2000. “Parental leave and child health.” Journal of Health Economics 19 (6):931–960.Google Scholar
Schneider, Daniel, and Harknett, Kristen. 2016. “Schedule instability and unpredictability and worker and family health and wellbeing.” Washington Center for Equitable Growth Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
Scott, Robert E. 2015. “The manufacturing footprint and the importance of US manufacturing jobs.” Economic Policy Institute, Briefing Paper 338.Google Scholar
Truskinovsky, Yulya. 2020. “The unintended consequences of child care subsidies on older women’s retirement security.” Journal of Human Resources (conditional acceptance).Google Scholar
Van Houtven, Courtney Harold, Coe, Norma B., and Skira, Meghan M.. 2013. “The effect of informal care on work and wages.” Journal of Health Economics 32 (1):240–252.Google Scholar
Waldfogel, Jane. 1998. “Understanding the ‘family gap’ in pay for women with children.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (1):137–156.Google Scholar
Wang, Wendy, Parker, Kim, and Taylor, Paul. 2013. Breadwinner moms. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Weber-Raley, Lisa, and Smith, Erin. 2015. Caregiving in the U.S. Washington, DC: National Alliance for Caregiving and the AARP Public Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Western, Bruce, Bloome, Deirdre, Sosnaud, Benjamin, and Tach, Laura. 2012. “Economic insecurity and social stratification.” Annual Review of Sociology 38 (1):341–359. DOI:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145434Google Scholar
Williams, Joan C., Lambert, Susan J., Kesavan, Saravanan, Fugiel, Peter J., Ospina, Lori Ann, Rapoport, Erin Devorah, Jarpe, Meghan, Bellisle, Dylan, Pandem, Pradeep, McCorkell, Lisa, and Adler-Milstein., Sarah 2018. “Schedule stability increases productivity and sales.” Berkeley: Work Life Law, University of California–Berkeley.Google Scholar
Women’s Bureau. 2016. Working mothers issue brief. Washington, DC: Women’s Bureau, US Department of Labor.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×