Bibliography

Dean R. Knight

doi:10.1017/9781108100007.007

Abrahams, D., ‘Conflicts of Evidence in Judicial Review Proceedings’ [1999] JR 221Google Scholar

Ahmed, F. and Perry, A., ‘Expertise, Deference, and Giving Reasons’ [2012] PL 221Google Scholar

Airo-Farulla, G., ‘Rationality and Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (2000) 24 MULR 543Google Scholar

Alder, J., Constitutional and Administrative Law (6th edn, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007)Google Scholar

Allan, T.R.S., ‘Fairness, Equality, Rationality: Constitutional Theory and Judicial Review’ in Forsyth, C. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Oxford University Press, 1998), 15Google Scholar

Allan, T.R.S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Allan, T.R.S., ‘The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review: Conceptual Conundrum or Interpretative Inquiry?’ (2002) 61 CLJ 87Google Scholar

Allan, T.R.S., ‘Constitutional Dialogue and the Justification of Judicial Review’ (2003) 23 OJLS 563Google Scholar

Allan, T.R.S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Allan, T.R.S., ‘Legislative Supremacy and Legislative Intent: A Reply to Professor Craig’ (2004) 24 OJLS 563Google Scholar

Allan, T.R.S., ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of Due Deference’ (2006) 65 CLJ 671CrossRef Google Scholar

Allan, T.R.S., ‘Deference, Defiance and Doctrine: Defining the Limits of Judicial Review’ (2010) 60 UTLJ 41CrossRef Google Scholar

Allan, T.R.S., ‘Judicial Deference and Judicial Review: Legal Doctrine and Legal Theory’ (2011) 127 LQR 96Google Scholar

Allan, T.R.S., The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution and Common Law (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Allars, M., ‘On Deference to Tribunals, With Deference to Dworkin’ (1994) 20 Queen's LJ 163Google Scholar

Allars, M., ‘Chevron in Australia, A Duplicitous Rejection?’ (2002) 54 Ad L Rev 569Google Scholar

Allison, J., ‘Transplantation and Cross Fertilisation in European Public Law’ in Beatson, J. and Tridimas, T. (eds.), New Directions in European Public Law (Hart Publishing, 1998)Google Scholar

Allison, J., The English Historical Constitution: Continuity, Change and European Effects (Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, S., ‘Judicial Review’ [2010] NZLJ 373 (book review)Google Scholar

Anonymous, ‘Professor SA de Smith’ (1974) 33 CLJ 177Google Scholar

Anthony, G., Judicial Review in Northern Ireland (2nd edn, Hart Publishing, 2008)Google Scholar

Arancibia, J., Judicial Review of Commercial Regulation (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Aronson, M., ‘The Resurgence of Jurisdictional Facts’ (2001) 12 PLR 17Google Scholar

Aronson, M., ‘Is the ADJR Act Hampering the Development of Australian Administrative Law?’ (2005) 15 PLR 202Google Scholar

Aronson, M., ‘Jurisdictional Error without the Tears’ in Groves, M. and Lee, H. (eds.), Australian Administrative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 330Google Scholar

Aronson, M., ‘Process, Quality and Variable Standards: Responding to an Agent Provocateur’ in Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Huscroft, G. (eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Hart Publishing, 2009), 5Google Scholar

Aronson, M. and Groves, M., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (5th edn, Thomson Reuters, 2013)Google Scholar

Arthurs, H., ‘Jonah and the Whale: The Appearance, Disappearance and Reappearance of Administrative Law’ (1980) 30 UTLJ 225Google Scholar

Austin, R., ‘Administrative Law's Reaction to the Changing Concepts of Public Service’ in Leyland, P. and Woods, T. (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future (Blackstone, 1997), 30Google Scholar

Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRef Google Scholar

Basten, J., ‘The Supervisory Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court’ (2011) 85 ALJ 273Google Scholar

Basten, J., ‘Jurisdictional Error After Kirk: Has it a Future?’ (2012) 23 PLR 94Google Scholar

Beatson, J., ‘The Scope of Judicial Review for Error of Law’ (1984) 4 OJLS 22Google Scholar

Beatson, J., ‘The Discretionary Nature of Public Law Remedies’ (1991) NZ Recent Law 81Google Scholar

Beck, A., ‘Farewell to the Forum Otiosum?’ [2011] NZLJ 269Google Scholar

Beloff, M.J., ‘The Concept of “Deference in Public Law”’ [2006] JR 213Google Scholar

Bennett, M., ‘Hart and Raz on the Non-Instrumental Moral Value of Law: A Reconsideration’ (2011) 30 Law & Phil 603Google Scholar

Bingham, T., The Business of Judging: Selected Essays and Speeches (Oxford University Press, 2000)CrossRef Google Scholar

Bingham, T., ‘The Human Rights Act’ [2010] EHRLR 568Google Scholar

Bingham, T., The Rule of Law (Penguin, 2011)Google Scholar

Birkinshaw, P., ‘De Smith's Judicial Review’ (2009) 15 EPL 279 (book review)Google Scholar

Blake, N., ‘Importing Proportionality: Clarification or Confusion’ [2002] EHRLR 19Google Scholar

Boughley, J., ‘Administrative Law: The Next Frontier for Comparative Law’ (2013) 62 ICLQ 55CrossRef Google Scholar

Boughley, J., ‘The Reasonableness of Proportionality in the Australian Administrative Law Context’ (2015) 43 Fed L Rev 59Google Scholar

Bradley, A. and Ewing, K., Constitutional and Administrative Law (14th edn, Pearson Longman, 2007)Google Scholar

Brady, A.D., Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act: An Institutionally Sensitive Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Burnton, S., ‘Proportionality’ [2011] JR 179Google Scholar

Cameron, B., ‘Legal Change over Fifty Years’ (1987) 3 Canta LR 199Google Scholar

Cane, P., ‘Merits Review and Judicial Review – The AAT as Trojan Horse’ (2000) 28 Fed L Rev 213Google Scholar

Cane, P., ‘The Making of Australian Administrative Law’ (2003) 23 Aust Bar Rev 114Google Scholar

Cane, P., Administrative Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Cane, P., ‘Understanding Judicial Review and its Impact’ in Hertogh, M. and Halliday, S. (eds.), Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 15Google Scholar

Cane, P., Administrative Tribunals and Adjudication (Hart Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar

Cane, P. and McDonald, L., Principles of Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Carnwath, R., ‘Tribunal Justice – A New Start’ [2009] PL 48Google Scholar

Carnwath, R., ‘From Judicial Outrage to Sliding Scales’ (ALBA Annual Lecture, November, 2013)Google Scholar

Cartier, G., ‘Keeping a Check on Discretion’ in Flood, C. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Administrative Law in Context (Emond Montgomery, 2008), 269Google Scholar

Chan, C., ‘Deference and the Separation of Powers: An Assessment of the Court's Constitutional and Institutional Competences’ (2011) 41 HKLJ 7Google Scholar

Clayton, R., ‘Legitimate Expectations, Policy, and the Principle of Consistency’ (2003) 62 CLJ 93Google Scholar

Clayton, R., ‘Judicial Deference and Democratic Dialogue: The Legitimacy of Judicial Intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2004] PL 33Google Scholar

Clayton, R., ‘Principles for Judicial Deference’ [2006] JR 109Google Scholar

Clayton, R., ‘New Arrangements for the Administrative Court’ [2008] JR 164Google Scholar

Clyde, L. and Edwards, D., Judicial Review (W. Green, 2000)Google Scholar

Cochrane, T., ‘A General Public Law Duty to Provide Reasons: Why New Zealand Should Follow the Irish Supreme Court’ (2013) 11 NZJPIL 517Google Scholar

Cohen, F.S., ‘Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach’ (1935) 35 Colum L Rev 809Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, M. and Porat, I., ‘American Balancing and German Proportionality: The Historical Origins’ (2010) 8 ICON 263Google Scholar

Cooke, F., ‘A Personal Word’ (2008) 39 VUWLR 15Google Scholar

Cooke, F., ‘The Future of Public Law in New Zealand’ in Administrative Law (NZ Law Society, 2011), 75Google Scholar

Cooke, R., ‘The Struggle for Simplicity in Administrative Law’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s (Oxford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Cooke, R., ‘Fairness’ (1989) 19 NZULR 421Google Scholar

Cooke, R., Turning Points of the Common Law (Sweet & Maxwell, 1997)Google Scholar

Cooke, R., ‘The Discretionary Heart of Administrative Law’ in Hare, I. and Forsyth, C. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays on Public Law in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Clarendon, 1998), 203Google Scholar

Cooke, R., ‘Foreword’ in Joseph, P.A. (ed.), Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand (2nd edn, Brookers, 2001)Google Scholar

Cooke, R., ‘The Road Ahead for the Common Law’ (2004) 53 ICLQ 273Google Scholar

Corder, H., ‘Administrative Justice Across the Commonwealth: A First Scan’ [2006] AJ 1Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘The Common Law, Reasons and Administrative Justice’ [1994] CLJ 282Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Substantive Legitimate Expectations in Community and Domestic Law’ (1996) 55 CLJ 289Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Unreasonableness and Proportionality in UK Law’ in Ellis, E. (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Hart Publishing, 1999), 85Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Public Law, Political Theory and Legal Theory’ [2000] PL 211Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘The Courts, the Human Rights Act and Judicial Review’ (2001) 117 LQR 589Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Constitutional Foundations, the Rule of Law and Supremacy’ (2003) PL 92Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Administrative Law in the Anglo-American Tradition’ in Peters, B.G. and Pierre, J. (eds.), Handbook of Public Administration (Sage, 2003), 269Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Judicial Review, Appeal and Factual Error’ [2004] PL 788Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘The Common Law, Shared Power and Judicial Review’ (2004) 24 OJLS 237Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Legislative Intent and Legislative Supremacy: A Reply to Professor Allan’ (2004) 24 OJLS 585Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Theory, “Pure Theory” and Values in Public Law’ (2005) PL 440Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Administrative Law’ in Dickson, B. and Drewry, G. (eds.), The Judicial House of Lords 1876–2009 (Oxford University Press, 2009), 524Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Fundamental Principles of Administrative Law’ in Feldman, D. (ed.), English Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Judicial Review and Questions of Law: A Comparative Perspective’ in Rose-Ackerman, S. and Lindseth, P. (eds.), Comparative Administrative Law (Edward Elgar, 2010)Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Proportionality, Rationality and Review’ [2010] NZ Law Rev 265Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘The Nature of Reasonableness Review’ (2013) 66 CLP 131Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., UK, EU and Global Administrative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2015)CrossRef Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., ‘Judicial Review and Anxious Scrutiny’ [2015] PL 60Google Scholar

Craig, P.P., Administrative Law (8th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2016)Google Scholar

Craig, P.P. and Rawlings, R. (eds.), Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow (Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Crown Law Office, A Judge Over Your Shoulder: A Guide to Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions (Crown Law Office (NZ), 2005)Google Scholar

Daley, J., ‘Defining Judicial Restraint’ in Campbell, T. and Goldsworthy, J. (eds.), Judicial Power, Democracy and Legal Positivism (Ashgate, 2000), 279Google Scholar

Daly, P., ‘Deference on Questions of Law’ (2011) 74 MLR 649Google Scholar

Daly, P., ‘Wednesbury's Reasoning and Structure’ [2011] PL 238Google Scholar

Daly, P., A Theory of Deference in Administrative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Daly, P., ‘Dunsmuir's Flaws Exposed’ (2012) 58 McGill LJ 1Google Scholar

Daly, P., ‘The Unfortunate Triumph of Form over Substance in Canadian Administrative Law’ (2012) 50 Osgoode Hall LJ 317CrossRef Google Scholar

Daly, P., ‘The Scope and Meaning of Reasonableness Review’ (2015) 52 Alta Law Rev 799Google Scholar

Davis, D.M., ‘To Defer and then When? Administrative Law and Constitutional Democracy’ [2006] AJ 23Google Scholar

De Smith, S., ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Action: A Study in Case Law’ (London School of Economics and Political Science, 1959)Google Scholar

De Smith, S., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (Stevens & Sons, 1959)Google Scholar

De Smith, S., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (2nd edn, Stevens & Sons, 1968)Google Scholar

De Smith, S., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (3rd edn, Stevens & Sons, 1973)Google Scholar

De Smith, S. and Evans, H.M., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (4th edn, Stevens & Sons, 1980)Google Scholar

De Ville, J., ‘The Rule of Law and Judicial Review’ [2006] AJ 62Google Scholar

Diplock, K., ‘Administrative Law’ (1974) 33 CLJ 233Google Scholar

Dodek, A.M. and Wright, D.A., ‘The McLachlin Court's First Decade – A Dynamic Time for Public Law’ in Dodek, A.M. and Wright, D.A. (eds.), Public Law at the McLachlin Court (Irwin Law, 2011), 1Google Scholar

Douglas, R. and Jones, M., Douglas and Jones’ Administrative Law (6th edn, Federation Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press, 1978)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R., Law's Empire (Harper Collins, 1998)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Hart Publishing, 1997), 279Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik's Conception of Legal Culture’ (1998) 14 SAJHR 11Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Form and Substance in the Rule of Law’ in Forsyth, C. (ed.), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Hart Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Constituting the Rule of Law: Fundamental Values of Administrative Law’ (2002) 27 Queens LJ 445Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Formalism's Hollow Victory’ [2002] NZ Law Rev 525Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Baker: Unity of Public Law’ in Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘The Genealogy of Legal Positivism’ (2004) 24 OJLS 39Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘David Mullan's Theory of the Rule of (Common) Law’ in Huscroft, G. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Inside and Outside Canadian Administrative Law: Essays in Honour of David Mullan (Toronto University Press, 2006), 448Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘The Legitimacy of the Rule of Law’ in Dyzenhaus, D., Murray, H. and Huscroft, G. (eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Hart Publishing, 2009), 33Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘The Very Idea of a Judge’ (2010) 60 UTLJ 61Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Dignity in Administrative Law: Judicial Deference in a Culture of Justification’ (2012) 17 Rev Const Stud 87Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Proportionality and Defence in a Culture of Justification’ in Huscroft, G., Miller, B.W. and Webber, G. (eds.), Proportionality and the Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press, 2014), 234Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Process and Substance as Aspects of the Public Law Form’ (2015) 74 Camb LJ 284CrossRef Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D. and Fox-Decent, E., ‘Rethinking the Process/Substance Distinction’ (2001) 51 UTLJ 193Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Huscroft, G. (eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Hart Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Taggart, M., ‘The Principle of Legality in Administrative Law: Internationalisation as Constitutionalisation’ (2001) 1 OUCLJ 5Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D. and Taggart, M., ‘Judicial Review, Jurisprudence and the Wizard of Oz’ (1990) 1 PLR 21Google Scholar

Edwards, R.A., ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act’ (2002) 65 MLR 859Google Scholar

Elias, S., ‘Administrative Law for Living People’ (2009) 68 CLJ 47Google Scholar

Elias, S., ‘Righting Administrative Law’ in Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Huscroft, G. (eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Hart Publishing, 2009), 55Google Scholar

Elias, S., ‘National Lecture on Administrative Law’ (Australian Institute of Administrative Law Conference, Canberra, 2013)Google Scholar

Elias, S., ‘The Unity of Public Law?’ (Public Law conference, September 2016, Cambridge)Google Scholar

Elliott, M., ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Standard of Substantive Review’ (2001) 60 CLJ 301Google Scholar

Elliott, M., ‘Wednesbury and Proportionality: Complementary Principles of Substantive Review’ [2002] JR 97Google Scholar

Elliott, M., ‘Unlawful Representations, Legitimate Expectations and Estoppel in Public Law’ [2003] JR 71Google Scholar

Elliott, M., ‘Legitimate Expectation, Consistency and Abuse of Power’ [2005] JR 71Google Scholar

Elliott, M., ‘Legitimate Expectations and the Search for Principle: Reflections on Abdi & Nadarajah’ [2009] JR 281Google Scholar

Elliott, M., ‘Proportionality and Deference: The Importance of a Structured Approach’ in Forsyth, C. and others (eds.), Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford University Press, 2010), 264Google Scholar

Elliott, M., Beatson, Matthews and Elliott's Administrative Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Elliott, M., ‘Has the Common Law Duty to Give Reasons Come of Age Yet?’ [2011] PL 56Google Scholar

Elliott, M., ‘Judicial Review's Scope, Foundations and Purposes’ [2012] NZ Law Rev 75Google Scholar

Elliott, M., ‘Justification, Calibration and Substantive Judicial Review’ (working paper, September 2013)Google Scholar

Elliott, M., ‘Proportionality and Deference’ (working paper, September 2013)Google Scholar

Elliott, M., ‘From Bifurcation to Calibration’ in Wilberg, H. and Elliott, M., The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review (Hart Publishing, 2015), 61Google Scholar

Elster, J., ‘Deliberation and Constitution Making’ in Elster, J. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Endicott, T.A., ‘Questions of Law’ (1998) 114 LQR 292Google Scholar

Endicott, T.A., ‘The Impossibility of the Rule of Law’ (1999) 19 OJLS 1Google Scholar

Endicott, T.A., ‘Are There Any Rules?’ (2001) 5 Legal Ethics 199Google Scholar

Endicott, T.A., Vagueness in Law (Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Endicott, T.A., Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Feldman, D., ‘Judicial Review: A Way of Controlling Government?’ (1998) 66 Pub Admin 21Google Scholar

Fenwick, H., Phillipson, G. and Masterman, R. (eds.), Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Flood, C. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Administrative Law in Context (Emond Montgomery, 2008)Google Scholar

>Flood, C. and Sossin, L. Administrative Law in Context (2nd edn, Emond Montgomery, 2012)Google Scholar

Foley, B., ‘Diceyan Ghosts – Deference, Rights, Policy and Spatial Distinctions’ (2006) 28 DULJ 77Google Scholar

Foley, B., Deference and the Presumption of Constitutionality (Institute of Public Administration, Dublin, 2008)Google Scholar

Fordham, M., ‘Surveying the Grounds’ in Leyland, P. and Woods, T. (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future (Blackstone, 1997)Google Scholar

Fordham, M., ‘Common Law Proportionality’ [2002] JR 110Google Scholar

Fordham, M., ‘Common Law Rights’ [2011] JR 14Google Scholar

Fordham, M., Judicial Review Handbook (6th edn, Hart Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar

Fordham, M. and de la Mare, T., ‘Anxious Scrutiny, the Principle of Legality and the Human Rights Act’ [2001] JR 40Google Scholar

Fordham, M. and de La Mare, T., ‘Identifying the Principles of Proportionality’ in Jowell, J. and Cooper, J. (eds.), Understanding Human Rights Principles (Hart Publishing, 2001), 32Google Scholar

Forsyth, C., ‘Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review’ (1996) 55 CLJ 122; also published in Forsyth, C. (ed.), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Hart Publishing, 2000), 29Google Scholar

Forsyth, C., ‘The Metaphysics of Nullity’ in Forsyth, C. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord (Oxford University Press, 1998), 141Google Scholar

Forsyth, C., ‘Showing the Fly the Way Out of the Flybottle: The Value of Formalism and Conceptual Reasoning in Administrative Law’ (2007) 66 CLJ 325Google Scholar

Forsyth, C., ‘Legitimate Expectations Revisited’ (2011) 16 JR 429Google Scholar

Forsyth, C. and Elliott, M., ‘The Legitimacy of Judicial Review’ [2003] PL 286Google Scholar

Forsyth, C. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Forsyth, C. and Whittle, L., ‘Judicial Creativity and Judicial Legitimacy in Administrative Law’ (2002) 8 Canta L Rev 453Google Scholar

Forsyth, C. and others (eds.), Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Franklin, C.N.K., ‘The Burgeoning Principle of Consistency in EU Law’ (2011) 30 YEL 42Google Scholar

Freckleton, A., ‘The Concept of Deference in Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions in Australia – Part 1’ (2013) 73 AIAL Forum 52Google Scholar

Freckleton, A., ‘The Concept of Deference in Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions in Australia – Part 2’ (2013) 73 AIAL Forum 48Google Scholar

French, R., ‘Administrative Law in Australia: Themes and Values Revisited’ in Groves, M. (ed.), Modern Administrative Law in Australia: Concepts and Context (Cambridge University Press, 2014), 24Google Scholar

Fuller, L.L., The Morality of Law (Yale University Press, 1964)Google Scholar

Fuller, L.L., The Anatomy of Law (Greenwood Press, 1976)Google Scholar

Gageler, S., ‘The Underpinnings of Judicial Review of Administrative Action: Common Law or Constitution?’ (2000) 28 Fed L Rev 303Google Scholar

Gageler, S., ‘Impact of Migration Law on the Development of Australian Administrative Law’ (2010) 17 AJ Admin L 92Google Scholar

Galligan, D., ‘Judicial Review and the Textbook Writers’ (1982) 2 OJLS 257Google Scholar

Galligan, D., Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion (Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S., The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Gearty, C., Principles of Human Rights Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Geiringer, C., ‘Tavita and All That’ (2004) 21 NZULR 66Google Scholar

Geiringer, C., ‘International Law Through the Lens of Zaoui: Where is New Zealand At?’ (2006) 17 PLR 300Google Scholar

Geiringer, C., ‘The Principle of Legality and the Bill of Rights Act: A Critical Examination of R v. Hansen’ in Geiringer, C. and Knight, D. (eds.), Seeing the World Whole: Essays in Honour of Sir Kenneth Keith (Victoria University Press, 2008), 69Google Scholar

Geiringer, C., ‘Sources of Resistance to Proportionality Review of Administrative Power Under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act’ (2013) 11 NZJPIL 123Google Scholar

Gleeson, M., ‘Judicial Legitimacy’ (2000) 20 Aust Bar Rev 4Google Scholar

Gordon, R., ‘Two Dogmas of Proportionality’ [2011] JR 18Google Scholar

Graham, C., ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (1997) 3 EPL 149 (book review)Google Scholar

Green, A.J., ‘Can There Be Too Much Context in Administrative Law? Setting the Standard of Review in Canadian Administrative Law’ (2014) 47 UBC Law Rev 443Google Scholar

Griffith, J., ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (1960) 18 CLJ 228 (book review)Google Scholar

Grimm, D., ‘Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence’ (2007) 57 UTLJ 393Google Scholar

Groves, M., ‘Treaties and Legitimate Expectations – The Rise and Fall of Teoh in Australia’ [2010] JR 323Google Scholar

Groves, M., ‘Should We Follow the Gospel of the ADJR Act?’ (2010) 34 MULR 736Google Scholar

Groves, M., (ed.), Modern Administrative Law in Australia: Concepts and Context (Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Groves, M. and Lee, H.P. (eds.), Australian Administrative Law: Fundamentals, Principles and Doctrines (Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms (MIT Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Halliday, S., Judicial Review and Compliance with Administrative Law (Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar

Hare, I., ‘The Separation of Powers and Judicial Review for Error of Law’ in Forsyth, C. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord (Oxford University Press, 2008), 113Google Scholar

Harlow, C., ‘Politics and Principles: Some Rival Theories of Administrative Law’ (1981) 44 MLR 114 (book review)Google Scholar

Harlow, C., ‘Changing the Mindset: The Place of Theory in English Administrative Law’ (1994) 14 OJLS 419Google Scholar

Harlow, C., ‘A Special Relationship? American Influences on Judicial Review in England’ in Loveland, I. (ed.), A Special Relationship? American Influences on Public Law in the UK (Oxford University Press, 1995), 79Google Scholar

Harlow, C., ‘Export, Import: The Ebb and Flow of English Public Law’ [2000] PL 240Google Scholar

Harlow, C. and Rawlings, R., Law and Administration (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Harris, B., ‘Judicial Review, Justiciability and the Prerogative of Mercy’ (2003) 62 CLJ 631Google Scholar

Hartogh, M. and Halliday, S., Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact (Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Hayne, K., ‘Deference: An Australian Perspective’ [2011] PL 75Google Scholar

Heckman, G., ‘Substantive Review in Appellate Courts Since Dunsmuir’ (2009) 47 Osgoode Hall LJ 751Google Scholar

Hertogh, M. and Halliday, S. (eds.), Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact (Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Hickman, T., ‘The Reasonableness Principle’ (2004) 63 CLJ 166Google Scholar

Hickman, T., ‘The Reasonableness Principle: Reassessing its Place in the Public Sphere’ (2004) 63 CLJ 166Google Scholar

Hickman, T., ‘In Defence of the Legal Constitution’ (2005) 55 UTLJ 981Google Scholar

Hickman, T., ‘Problems for Proportionality’ (2010) NZ Law Rev 303Google Scholar

Hickman, T., Public Law after the Human Rights Act (Hart Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar

Hogg, P.W., ‘The Supreme Court of Canada and Administrative Law, 1949–1971’ (1973) 11 Osgoode Hall LJ 187Google Scholar

Hood, Phillips O., ‘Book Review: Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (1960) 23 MLR 458 (book review)Google Scholar

Hunt, M., Using Human Rights in English Courts (Hart Publishing, 1997)Google Scholar

Hunt, M., ‘Sovereignty's Blight: Why Contemporary Public Law Needs a Concept of Due Deference’ in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Hart Publishing, 2003), 337Google Scholar

Hunt, M., ‘Against Bifurcation’ in Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Huscroft, G. (eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Hart Publishing, 2009), 99Google Scholar

Huscroft, G., ‘The Duty of Fairness’ in Flood, C. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Administrative Law in Context (Emond Montgomery, 2008), 115Google Scholar

Huscroft, G., ‘Judicial Review from CUPE to CUPE’ in Huscroft, G. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Inside and Outside Canadian Administrative Law (University of Toronto Press, 2009), 296Google Scholar

Huscroft, G. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Inside and Outside Canadian Administrative Law: Essays in Honour of David Mullan (Toronto UP, 2006)Google Scholar

Hutcheson, J.C., ‘The Judgment Intuitive: The Function of the Hunch in Judicial Decision’ (1929) 14 Cornell L Rev 274Google Scholar

Illingworth, G., ‘Fundamental Rights and the Margin of Appreciation’ [2010] NZLJ 424Google Scholar

Jaffe, L.T., ‘Book Review: Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (1961) 74 Harv Law Rev 636 (book review)Google Scholar

Jones, D. and de Villars, A., Principles of Administrative Law (5th edn, Carswell, 2009)Google Scholar

Jones, T.H., ‘Judicial Review and Codification’ (2006) 20 LS 517Google Scholar

Jones, T.H. and Williams, J.M., ‘Wales as a Jurisdiction’ [2004] PL 78Google Scholar

Joseph, P.A., ‘The Demise of Ultra Vires: Judicial Review in the New Zealand Courts’ [2001] PL 354Google Scholar

Joseph, P.A., ‘The Demise of Ultra Vires – A Reply to Christopher Forsyth and Linda Whittle’ (2002) 8 Canta LR 463Google Scholar

Joseph, P.A., ‘The Contributions of the Court of Appeal to Commonwealth Administrative Law’ in Bigwood, R. (ed.), The Permanent New Zealand Court of Appeal: Essays on the First 50 Years (Hart Publishing, 2009), 41Google Scholar

Joseph, P.A., ‘The Rule of Law’ in Ekins, R. (ed.), Modern Challenges to the Rule of Law (LexisNexis, 2011), 47Google Scholar

Joseph, P.A., ‘Exploratory Questions in Administrative Law’ (2012) 25 NZULR 75Google Scholar

Joseph, P.A., Constitutional and Administrative Law (4th edn, Brookers, 2014)Google Scholar

Joseph, P.A., ‘False Dichotomies in Administrative Law’ [2016] NZ Law Rev 127Google Scholar

Jowell, J., ‘Proportionality’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), New Directions in Judicial Review (Steven & Sons, 1988), 51Google Scholar

Jowell, J., ‘Is Equality a Constitutional Principle’ (1994) 7 CLP 1Google Scholar

Jowell, J., ‘Of Vires and Vacuums: The Constitutional Context of Judicial Review’ [1999] PL 448Google Scholar

Jowell, J., ‘Beyond the Rule of Law: Towards Constitutional Judicial Review’ [2000] PL 671Google Scholar

Jowell, J., ‘Judicial Deference: Servility, Civility or Institutional Capacity?’ [2003] PL 592Google Scholar

Jowell, J., ‘Judicial Deference and Human Rights’ in Craig, P. and Rawlings, R. (eds.), Law and Administration in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2003), 67.Google Scholar

Jowell, J., ‘Administrative Law’ in Bogdanor, V. (ed.), The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century (Oxford University Press, 2003), 373Google Scholar

Jowell, J., ‘The Democratic Necessity of Administrative Justice’ [2006] AJ 13Google Scholar

Jowell, J., ‘The Rule of Law and its Underlying Values’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), The Changing Constitution (6th edn, Oxford University Press, 2007), 5Google Scholar

Jowell, J. and Lester, A., ‘Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law’ [1988] PL 368Google Scholar

Jowell, J. and Lester, A., ‘Proportionality: Neither Novel nor Dangerous’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), New Directions in Judicial Review (Steven & Sons, 1988), 51Google Scholar

Kaplow, L., ‘Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis’ (1992) 42 Duke LJ 557Google Scholar

Kavanagh, A., ‘The Elusive Divide Between Interpretation and Legislation Under the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2004) 24 OJLS 259Google Scholar

Kavanagh, A., ‘Deference or Defiance? The Limits of the Judicial Role in Constitutional Adjudication’ in Huscroft, G. (ed.), Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2008), 184Google Scholar

Kavanagh, A., Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Kavanagh, A., ‘Defending Deference in Public Law and Constitutional Theory’ (2010) 126 LQR 222Google Scholar

Kavanagh, A., ‘Judicial Restraint in the Pursuit of Justice’ (2010) UTLJ 23Google Scholar

Keene, D., ‘Principles of Deference Under the Human Rights Act’ in Fenwick, H., Phillipson, G. and Masterman, R. (eds.), Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 206Google Scholar

Kenall, D., ‘De-Regulating the Regulatory Compact: The Legacy of Dunsmuir and the “Jurisdictional” Question Doctrine’ (2011) 24 CJALP 115Google Scholar

King, J.A., ‘The Justiciability of Resource Allocation’ (2007) 70 MLR 197Google Scholar

King, J.A., ‘Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint’ (2008) 28 OJLS 409Google Scholar

King, J.A., ‘Proportionality: A Halfway House’ (2010) NZ Law Rev 327Google Scholar

King, J.A., ‘The Instrumental Value of Legal Accountability’ in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2013), 124Google Scholar

Kirk, J., ‘The Concept of Jurisdictional Error’ in Williams, N. (ed.), Key Issues in Judicial Review (Federation Press, 2014), 11Google Scholar

Klinck, J.A., ‘Reasonableness Review: Conceptualizing a Single Contextual Standard from Divergent Approaches in Dunsmuir and Khosa’ (2011) 24 CJALP 41Google Scholar

Knight, D.R., ‘A Murky Methodology: Standards of Review in Administrative Law’ (2008) 6 NZJPIL 117Google Scholar

Knight, D.R., ‘Simple, Fair, Discretionary Administrative Law’ (2008) 39 VUWLR 99Google Scholar

Knight, D.R., ‘Mapping the Rainbow of Review’ [2010] NZ Law Rev 393Google Scholar

Kress, K., ‘Coherence and Formalism’ (1993) 16 Harv J L & Pub Pol'y 639Google Scholar

Kumm, M., ‘The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification’ (2010) 4 Law and Ethics of Human Rights 147Google Scholar

Laws, J., ‘De Smith, Woolf and Jowell’ (1996) 1996 JR 49 (book review)Google Scholar

Laws, J., ‘Illegality’ in Supperstone, M. and Goudie, J. (eds.), Judicial Review (2nd edn, Butterworths, 1997), 51Google Scholar

Laws, J., ‘Wednesbury’ in Forsyth, C. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord (Oxford University Press, 1998), 141Google Scholar

Lawson, G. and Kam, S., ‘Making Law Out of Nothing at All’ (2013) 65 Admin LR 1Google Scholar

Le Sueur, A., ‘The Judicial Review Debate: From Partnership to Friction’ (1996) 31 Government and Opposition 8Google Scholar

Le Sueur, A., ‘Legal Duties to Give Reasons’ (1999) 52 CLP 150Google Scholar

Le Sueur, A., ‘The Rise and Ruin of Unreasonableness?’ [2005] JR 32Google Scholar

Le Sueur, A., Herberg, J. and English, R., Principles of Public Law (Cavendish, 1999)Google Scholar

Leigh, I., ‘Taking Rights Proportionately’ (2002) 47 PL 265Google Scholar

Leigh, I., ‘The Standard of Judicial Review after the Human Rights Act’ in Fenwick, H., Phillipson, G. and Masterman, R. (eds.), Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 174Google Scholar

Lewans, M., ‘Deference and Reasonableness since Dunsmuir’ (2012) 38 Queen's LJ 59Google Scholar

Lewis, C., Judicial Remedies in Public Law (5th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2014)Google Scholar

Leyland, P. and Woods, T. (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future (Blackstone, 1997)Google Scholar

Leyland, P. and Woods, T., Textbook on Administrative Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Lipton, T., ‘Justifying True Questions of Jurisdiction’ (2015) 46 Ottawa Law Rev 275Google Scholar

Liston, M., ‘Governments in Miniature’ in Flood, C. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Administrative Law in Context (Emond Montgomery, 2008), 105Google Scholar

Loughlin, M., ‘A Study of the Crisis in Administrative Law Theory’ (1978) 28 UTLJ 215Google Scholar

Loughlin, M., ‘The Pathways of Public Law Scholarship’ in Wilson, G.P. (ed.), Frontiers of Legal Scholarship (Wiley, 1995), 163Google Scholar

Loughlin, M., The Idea of Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Loughlin, M., Foundations of Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Loveland, I., Constitutional Law, Administrative Law and Human Rights (5th edn, Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

MacCormick, N., Rhetoric and The Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Macklin, A., ‘Standard of Review: Back to the Future?’ in Flood, C. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Administrative Law in Context (2nd edn, Emond Montgomery, 2012), 279Google Scholar

Mason, A., ‘Mike Taggart and Australian Exceptionalism’ in Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Huscroft, G. (eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Bloomsbury, 2009), 179Google Scholar

Mason, K., ‘What is Wrong with Top-Down Legal Reasoning?’ (2004) 78 ALJ 574Google Scholar

McCrudden, E., ‘Equality and Non-Discrimination’ in Feldman, D. (ed.), English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2009), 499Google Scholar

McDonald, L., ‘Rethinking Unreasonableness Review’ (2014) 25 PLR 117Google Scholar

McGarry, J., ‘Effecting Legal Certainty under the Human Rights Act’ [2011] JR 66Google Scholar

McMillan, J., ‘Judicial Restraint and Activism in Administrative Law’ (2002) 30 Fed L Rev 335Google Scholar

Meazell, E., ‘Deference and Dialogue in Administrative Law’ (2011) 111 Colum L Rev 1722Google Scholar

Mullan, D.J., ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ [1975] NZLJ 154Google Scholar

Mullan, D.J., Administrative Law (Irwin Law, 2001)Google Scholar

Mullan, D.J., ‘Establishing the Standard of Review: the Struggle for Complexity?’ (2004) 17 CJALP 59Google Scholar

Mullan, D.J., ‘Deference from Baker to Suresh and Beyond’ in Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing, 2004), 21Google Scholar

Mullan, D.J., ‘Deference: Is it Useful Outside Canada?’ (2006) AJ 42Google Scholar

Mullan, D.J., ‘The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Direct Driver of Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Canada?’ in Pearson, L., Harlow, C. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Administrative Law in a Changing State: Essays in Honour of Mark Aronson (Hart Publishing, 2008), 123Google Scholar

Mullan, D.J., ‘Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, Standard of Review and Procedural Fairness for Public Servants: Let's Try Again!’ (2008) 21 CJALP 117Google Scholar

Mullan, D.J., ‘Judicial Review of the Executive: Principled Exasperation’ (2010) 8 NZJPIL 1Google Scholar

Mullan, D.J., ‘Proportionality – A Proportionate Response to an Emerging Crisis in Canadian Judicial Review Law?’ [2010] NZ Law Rev 233Google Scholar

Mullan, D.J., ‘Unresolved Issues on the Standard of Review in Canadian Judicial Review of Administrative Action – the Top Fifteen!’ (2013) 42 AQ 1Google Scholar

Mullan, D.J., Taggart, M. and Huscroft, G., Inside and Outside Canadian Administrative Law: Essays in Honour of David Mullan (University of Toronto Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Mureinik, E., ‘A Bridge to Where?’ (1994) 10 SAJHR 31Google Scholar

Murphy, C., ‘Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law’ (2005) 24 Law & Phil 239Google Scholar

Murray, P., ‘Process, Substance and the History of Error of Law Review’ in Bell, J. and others, Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems (Bloomsbury, 2016), 87Google Scholar

Neill, P., ‘The Duty to Give Reasons’ in Forsyth, C. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Neuberger, L., Thompson, P.K. and Di Mambro, L., Civil Court Practice 2009 (The Green Book) (LexisNexis, 2009)Google Scholar

Oliver, D., ‘Is the Ultra Vires Rule the Basis of Judicial Review?’ [1987] PL 543Google Scholar

Oliver, D., ‘The Judge Over Your Shoulder’ (1989) 42 Parliamentary Affairs 302Google Scholar

Oliver, D., ‘Judge Over Your Shoulder – Mark II’ [1994] PL 514Google Scholar

Orsi, S.D., ‘Legitimate Expectations: An Overview’ [2010] JR 388Google Scholar

Pearson, L., Harlow, C. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Administrative Law in a Changing State: Essays in Honour of Mark Aronson (Hart Publishing, 2008)Google Scholar

Phillipson, G., ‘Deference, Discretion and Democracy in the Human Rights Act Era’ (2007) 60 CLP 40Google Scholar

Picinali, F., ‘Two Meanings of “Reasonableness”: Dispelling the “Floating” Reasonable Doubt’ (2013) 76 MLR 845Google Scholar

Pocock, J., The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar

Poole, T., ‘Justice, Rights and Judicial Humility: ex p Simms’ [2000] JR 106Google Scholar

Poole, T., ‘Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism’ (2003) 23 OJLS 454Google Scholar

Poole, T., ‘Legitimacy, Rights and Judicial Review’ (2005) 25 OJLS 697Google Scholar

Poole, T., ‘Tilting at Windmills? Truth and Illusion in “The Political Constitution”’ (2007) 70 MLR 250Google Scholar

Poole, T., ‘Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Administrative Law in an Age of Rights’ in Pearson, L., Harlow, C. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Administrative Law in a Changing State: Essays in Honour of Mark Aronson (Hart Publishing, 2008), 15Google Scholar

Poole, T., ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law’ (2009) 68 CLJ 142Google Scholar

Poole, T., ‘Judicial Review at the Margins’ (2010) 60 UTLJ 81Google Scholar

Poole, T., ‘Proportionality in Perspective’ [2010] NZ Law Rev 369Google Scholar

Posner, E.A., ‘Standards, Rules, and Social Norms’ (1997) 211 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 101Google Scholar

Posner, R.A., ‘Legal Reasoning From the Top Down and From the Bottom Up’ [1992] U Chicago LR 433Google Scholar

Posner, R.A., ‘The Rise and Fall of Judicial Self-Restraint’ (2012) 100 CLR 519Google Scholar

Rawlings, R., ‘Modelling Judicial Review’ (2008) 61 CLP 95Google Scholar

Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples (Harvard UP, 2001)Google Scholar

Raz, J., ‘The Rule of Law and its Virtue’ (1977) 93 LQR 195Google Scholar

Raz, J., The Authority of Law (Clarendon, 1979)Google Scholar

Rishworth, P. (ed.), The Struggle for Simplicity in the Law: Essays for Lord Cooke of Thorndon (Butterworths, 1997)Google Scholar

Rivers, J., ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’ (2006) 65 CLJ 174Google Scholar

Robson, W.A., ‘Administrative Law in England, 1919–1948’ in Campion, G. (ed.), British Government Since 1918 (Allan and Unwin, 1950), 85Google Scholar

Robson, W.A., ‘Administrative Law’ in Ginsberg, M. (ed.), Law and Opinion in England in the 20th Century (University of California Press, 1959), 193Google Scholar

Rodriguez Ferrere, M., ‘The Unnecessary Confusion in New Zealand's Appellate Jurisdictions’ (2012) 12 OLR 829Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, S. and Lindseth, P.L., ‘Comparative Administrative Law: Outlining a Field of Study’ (2010) 28 Windsor YB Access Just 435Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, S. and Lindseth, P.L. (eds.), Comparative Administrative Law (Edward Elgar, 2010)Google Scholar

Sales, P., ‘A Comparison of the Principle of Legality and Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2009) 125 LQR 598Google Scholar

Sales, P. and Clement, J., ‘International Law in Domestic Courts’ [2008] LQR 388Google Scholar

Samuel, G., ‘Can the Common Law be Mapped?’ (2005) 55 UTLJ 271Google Scholar

Saunders, C., ‘Apples, Oranges and Comparative Administrative Law’ [2006] AJ 423Google Scholar

Saunders, C., ‘Constitution, Codes and Administrative Law’ in Forsyth, C. and others (eds.), Effective Judicial Review (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Saunders, C., ‘Constitution as Catalyst: Different Paths within Australasian Administrative Law’ (2012) 10 NZJPIL 143Google Scholar

Schlag, P.J., ‘Rules and Standards’ (1985) 33 UCLA L Rev 379Google Scholar

Schønberg, S., Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Sedley, S.S., ‘The Sound of Silence’ in Bogdanor, V. (ed.), The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century (Oxford University Press, 2003), 373Google Scholar

Smith, M., ‘Embracing Proportionality Review’ [2011] NZLJ 224Google Scholar

Smith, M., The New Zealand Judicial Review Handbook (2nd edn., Thomson Reuters, 2016)Google Scholar

Soper, P., The Ethics of Deference: Learning from Law's Morals (Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Sossin, L. and Flood, C., ‘The Contextual Turn’ (2007) 57 UTLJ 581Google Scholar

Spiegelman, J., ‘The Centrality of Jurisdictional Error’ (2010) 21 PLR 77Google Scholar

Stern, K., ‘Substantive Fairness in UK and Australian Law’ (2007) 29 Aust Bar Rev 266Google Scholar

Steyn, J., ‘Deference: A Tangled Story’ [2005] PL 346Google Scholar

Stratas, D., ‘The Canadian Law of Judicial Review’ (2016) Queen's LR 27Google Scholar

Sumption, J., ‘Judicial and Political Decision-making: The Uncertain Boundary’ [2011] JR 301Google Scholar

Sunkin, M. and Richardson, G., ‘Judicial Review: Questions of Impact’ (1996) PL 79Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘Rival Theories of Invalidity in Administrative Law’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s (Oxford University Press, 1986), 93Google Scholar

Taggart, M. (ed.), Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s (Oxford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘Outside Canadian Administrative Law’ (1996) 46 UTLJ 649Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘Introduction to JR in New Zealand’ [1997] JR 236Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘The Contribution of Lord Cooke to Scope of Review Doctrine in Administrative Law: A Comparative Common Law Perspective’ in Rishworth, P. (ed.), The Struggle for Simplicity in the Law: Essays for Lord Cooke of Thorndon (Butterworths, 1997), 189Google Scholar

Taggart, M., The Province of Administrative Law (Hart Publishing, 1997)Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘Reinvented Government, Traffic Lights and the Convergence of Public and Private Law’ [1999] PL 124Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘Ultra Vires as a Distraction’ in Forsyth, C. (ed.), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Hart Publishing, 2000), 427Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘Reinventing Administrative Law’ in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Hart Publishing, 2003), 311Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘The New Zealandness of New Zealand Public Law’ (2004) 15 PLR 81Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘The Tub of Public Law’ in Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘Prolegomenon to an Intellectual History of Administrative Law in the Twentieth Century: the Case of John Willis and Canadian Administrative Law’ (2005) 43 Osgoode Hall LJ 224Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘Administrative Law’ [2006] NZ Law Rev 75Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘“Australian Exceptionalism” in Judicial Review’ (2008) 36 Fed LR 1Google Scholar

Taggart, M., ‘Proportionality, Deference, Wednesbury’ [2008] NZ Law Rev 424Google Scholar

Taylor, G.D.S., ‘May Judicial Review Become a Backwater?’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s (Oxford University Press, 1986), 153Google Scholar

Taylor, G.D.S. Judicial Review: A New Zealand Perspective (3rd edn, LexisNexis, 2014)Google Scholar

Thomas, R., Legitimate Expectations and Proportionality in Administrative Law (Hart Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar

Thwaites, R. and Knight, D.R., ‘Review and Appeal of Regulatory Decisions’ in Frankel, S. (ed.), Learning from the Past, Adapting for the Future (LexisNexis, 2011)Google Scholar

Treasury Solicitor, The Judge Over Your Shoulder (4th edn, Government Legal Service, 2006)Google Scholar

Urbina, F.J., ‘A Critique of Proportionality’ (2012) 57 Am J Juris 49Google Scholar

Varuhas, J.N., ‘Keeping Things in Proportion: The Judiciary, Executive Action and Human Rights’ (2006) 22 NZULR 300Google Scholar

Varuhas, J.N., ‘Powerco v. Commerce Commission: Developing Trends of Proportionality in New Zealand Administrative Law’ (2006) 4 NZJPIL 339Google Scholar

Von Hayek, F., The Road to Serfdom (University of Chicago Press, 1944)Google Scholar

Waddams, S.M., ‘Judicial Discretion’ (2001) 1 OUCLJ 59Google Scholar

Wade, W., ‘The Twilight of Natural Justice?’ (1951) 67 LQR 103Google Scholar

Wade, W., ‘Anglo-American Administrative Law: More Reflections’ (1966) 82 LQR 226Google Scholar

Wade, W., ‘Constitutional and Administrative Aspects of the Anisminic Case’ (1969) 85 LQR 211Google Scholar

Wade, W. and Forsyth, C., Administrative Law (11th edn, Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Waldron, J., ‘Why Law? – Efficacy, Freedom or Fidelity?’ (1994) 13 Law & Phil 259Google Scholar

Walker, P., ‘What's Wrong with Irrationality’ [1995] PL 556Google Scholar

Walters, M.D., ‘Jurisdiction, Functionalism, and Constitutionalism in Canadian Administrative Law’ in Forsyth, C. and others (eds.), Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford University Press, 2010), 300Google Scholar

Waluchow, W.J., ‘Legal Rules and Palm Tree Justice’ (1985) 4 Law & Phil 41Google Scholar

Watson, A., Legal Transplants (University of Georgia Press, 1974)Google Scholar

Watson, A., Comparative Law (2nd edn, Vandeplas, 2008)Google Scholar

Weaver, R.L. and Jellum, L.D., ‘Neither Fish nor Fowl: Administrative Judges in the Modern Administrative State’ (2010) 28 Windsor YB Access Just 243Google Scholar

Webber, G.C., The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Fights (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Webber, G.C., ‘Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship’ (2010) 23 CJLJ 179Google Scholar

Weber, M., Economy and Society (University of California Press, 1978)Google Scholar

Weinrib, E.J., ‘The Jurisprudence of Legal Formalism’ (1993) 16 Harv J L & Pub Pol'y 584Google Scholar

Wilberg, H., ‘Administrative Law’ [2010] NZ Law Rev 177Google Scholar

Wilberg, H., ‘Substantive Grounds of Review’ (Legal Research Foundation Conference, Auckland, April, 2011)Google Scholar

Wildeman, S., ‘Pas de Deux: Deference and non-Deference in Action’ in Flood, C. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Administrative Law in Context (2nd edn, Emond Montgomery, 2012), 323Google Scholar

Williams, D., ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (1974) 33 CLJ 324 (book review)Google Scholar

Williams, D., ‘Justiciability and the Control of Discretionary Power’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s (Oxford University Press, 1986), 103Google Scholar

Williams, R., ‘When is an Error not an Error: Reform of Jurisdictional Review of Error of Law and Fact’ [2007] PL 793Google Scholar

Willis, E., ‘Judicial Review and Deference’ [2011] NZLJ 283Google Scholar

Woolf, H., ‘The Role of the English Judiciary in Developing Public Law’ (1986) 27 Wm & Mary L Rev 669Google Scholar

Woolf, H. and Jowell, J., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (5th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 1995)Google Scholar

Woolf, H., Jowell, J. and Le Sueur, A., De Smith's Judicial Review (6th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2007)Google Scholar

Woolf, H. and others, De Smith's Judicial Review (7th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2013)Google Scholar

Woolley, A., ‘The Metaphysical Court: Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick and the Standard of Review’ (2008) 21 CJALP 259Google Scholar

Young, A.L., ‘Professor SA de Smith’ (1974) 33 CLJ 177 (obituary)Google Scholar

Young, A.L., ‘Professor SA de Smith’ (1974) 37 MLR 241 (obituary)Google Scholar

Young, A.L., ‘In Defence of Due Deference’ (2009) 74 MLR 554Google Scholar

Young, A.L., ‘Deference, Dialogue and the Search for Legitimacy’ (2010) 30 OJLS 815Google Scholar

Young, A.L., ‘Proportionality is Dead, Long Live Proportionality’ in Huscroft, G., Miller, B.W. and Webber, G. (eds.), Proportionality and the Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press, 2014), 43Google Scholar

Young, A.L., ‘Will You, Won't You, Will You Join in the Deference Dance’ (2014) 34 OJLS 375.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive