Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Bernauer, Thomas
Elsig, Manfred
and
Pauwelyn, Joost
2010.
The World Trade Organization’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism – Analysis and Problems.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
2010.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
Leiden Journal of International Law,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 3,
p.
675.
Birkbeck, Carolyn Deere
2011.
Making Global Trade Governance Work for Development.
p.
579.
CONCONI, PAOLA
and
PAUWELYN, JOOST
2011.
Trading Cultures: Appellate Body Report on China–Audiovisuals (WT/DS363/AB/R, adopted 19 January 2010).
World Trade Review,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
p.
95.
Adlung, Rudolf
and
Miroudot, Sebastien
2012.
Poison in the Wine? Tracing Gats-Minus Commitments in Regional Trade Agreements.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Elsig, Manfred
and
Stucki, Philipp
2012.
Low-income developing countries and WTO litigation: Why wake up the sleeping dog?.
Review of International Political Economy,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
292.
Staiger, Robert W.
and
Sykes, Alan O.
2012.
Non-Violations.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Bartels, Lorand
2013.
Making WTO Dispute Settlement Work for African Countries: An Evaluation of Current Proposals for Reforming the DSU.
The Law and Development Review,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 2,
Lakatos, Csilla
and
Walmsley, Terrie
2014.
Dispute Settlement at the WTO: Impacts of a No Deal in the US‐Brazil Cotton Dispute.
The World Economy,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 2,
p.
244.
Allee, Todd
and
Elsig, Manfred
2015.
Trade Cooperation.
p.
319.
James C Hartigan, Petros C Mavroidis, and Joseph McMahon, Profs
and
Sacerdoti, Giorgio
2015.
Resolution of international trade disputes in the WTO and other Fora.
Journal of International Trade Law and Policy,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 3,
p.
147.
LYDGATE, EMILY
2016.
Sorting Out Mixed Messages under the WTO National Treatment Principle: A Proposed Approach.
World Trade Review,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 3,
p.
423.
Folkert Graafsma
and
Siddhartha Rajagopal
2016.
WTO Dispute Settlement at Twenty.
p.
135.
Allee, Todd
and
Elsig, Manfred
2016.
Why do some international institutions contain strong dispute settlement provisions? New evidence from preferential trade agreements.
The Review of International Organizations,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
p.
89.
Jansen, Marion
Pauwelyn, Joost
and
Carpenter, Theresa H.
2016.
The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes: A Coherent Way Forward.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
DLUHOSCH, BARBARA
2016.
Tit-for-tat in trade policies: nothing but a fest for vested interests?.
Journal of Institutional Economics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
217.
Flett, James
2017.
The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes.
p.
83.
De Bièvre, Dirk
Poletti, Arlo
and
Yildirim, Aydin
2017.
Assessing the World Trade Organization.
p.
120.
Jansen, Marion
Pauwelyn, Joost
and
Carpenter, Theresa
2017.
The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes.
p.
383.
TROMMER, SILKE
2017.
The WTO in an Era of Preferential Trade Agreements: Thick and Thin Institutions in Global Trade Governance.
World Trade Review,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 3,
p.
501.