Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T15:26:14.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2021

Rosemary Erlam ,
Jenefer Philp  and
Diana Feick
Rosemary Erlam
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Jenefer Philp
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Diana Feick
Affiliation:
University of Auckland

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
Teaching Languages to Adolescent Learners
From Theory to Practice
 , pp. 169 - 184
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Abeysekera, L., and Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsson, N., and Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310808073XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alegria de la Colina, A., and del Pilar García Mayo, M. (2009). Oral interaction in task-based EFL learning: The use of the L1 as a cognitive tool. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(3–4), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.014Google Scholar
Alexander, B., Adams Becker, S., and Cummins, M. (2016). Digital literacy: An NMC Horizon Project strategic brief. Horizon Project, 3(3). Austin, TX: New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
Al-Homoud, F., and Schmitt, N. (2009). Extensive reading in a challenging environment: A comparison of extensive and intensive reading approaches in Saudi Arabia. Language Teaching Research, 33(4), 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. P., Swain, M., Harley, B., and Cummins, J. (1990). Aspects of classroom treatment: Towards a more comprehensive view of second language education. In Harley, B., Allen, J. P., Cummins, J., and Swain, M., eds., The Development of Second Language Proficiency (pp. 57–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aston, G. (1993). Notes on the interlanguage of comity. In Kasper, G. and Blum-Kulka, S., eds., Interlanguage Pragmatics (pp. 224–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baars, B. J. (1997). In the theatre of consciousness: Global workspace theory, a rigorous scientific theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4(4), 292–309.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batstone, R., and Philp, J. (2013). Classroom interaction and learning across time and space. In McDonough, K. and Mackey, A., eds., Second Language Interaction in Diverse Educational Contexts (pp. 109–128). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bekar, M., and Christiansen, M. S. (2018). Computer‐mediated communication (CMC). In Liontas, J. I. and DelliCarpini, M., eds., The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0816Google Scholar
Berman, R. (2007). Language knowledge and use across adolescence. In Hoff, E. and Shatz, M., eds., Blackwell Handbook of Language Development (pp. 347–367). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R., eds. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–1770.1996.tb01246.xGoogle Scholar
Breen, M., ed. (2001). Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in Research . Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D., and Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices, 2nd ed. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., and Samuda, V. (2009). Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose and engagement within the interaction approach. In Mackey, A. and Polio, C., eds., Multiple Perspectives on Interaction: Second Language Research in Honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 90–116). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carlson, R. A. (2003). Skill learning. In Nadel, L., ed., Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (Vol. IV, pp. 36–42). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chik, A. (2012). Digital gameplay for autonomous foreign language learning: Gamers’ and language teachers’ perspectives. In Reinders, H., ed., Digital Games in Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 95–114). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137005267_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, K. K. H., and Lam, C. B. (2020). Cognitive linguistic skills underlying word reading and spelling difficulties in Chinese adolescents with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(1), 48–59.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (2018). Technology for teaching reading. In Liontas, J. I. and DelliCarpini, M. eds., The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0444Google Scholar
Collins, L., and Muñoz, C. (2016). The foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (S1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, T. D., Deng, Y., and Morgano, E. (2007). Friendship influences during early adolescence: The special role of friends’ grade point average. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(2), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532–7795.2007.00525.xGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402Google Scholar
Cornillie, F., Clarebout, G., and Desmet, P. (2012). Between learning and playing? Exploring learners’ perceptions of corrective feedback in an immersive game for English pragmatics. ReCALL, 24(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I. M., and Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crone, E. (2011). Das pubertierende Gehirn. Wie Kinder erwachsen werden. Munich: Droemer.Google Scholar
Crookes, G., and Schmidt, R. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41(4), 469–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–1770.1991.tb00690.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. (2015). Inclusion and language learning: Pedagogical principles for integrating students from marginalized groups in the mainstream classroom. In Bongartz, C. and Rohde, A., eds., Inklusion im Englischunterricht (pp. 95–116). Frankfurt: Peter Lang Edition.Google Scholar
Dawes, L. (2004). Research report: Talk and learning in classroom science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 677–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000097424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46(3), 529–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–1770.1996.tb01246.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E., and Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Doughty, C. and Williams, J., eds., Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (pp. 42–63). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical periods in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 493–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004022Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Situating the concept of practice. In DeKeyser, R., ed., Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke, L., and Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Toward a definition. CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings (pp. 12–15). Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J., Witney, J., Saito, K., and Dewaele, L. (2018). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 676–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273–284. doi:10.2307/330107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. London: Longman Pearson.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., and Maldarez, A. (1997). Group dynamics and foreign language learning. System, 25(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00061–9Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., and Ryan, S. (2015). The Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., and Ushoida, E., eds. (2009). Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotterer, A. M., McHale, S. M., and Crouter, A. C. (2009). The development and correlates of academic interests from childhood through adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013987CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doughty, C., and Williams, J., eds. (1998). Focus-on-Form in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duchesne, S., and McMaugh, A. (2016). Educational Psychology for Learning and Teaching, 5th ed. Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
East, M. (2012). Task-Based Language Teaching from the Teachers’ Perspective. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edstrom, A. (2006). L1 use in the L2 classroom: One teacher’s self-evaluation. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(2), 275–292. doi:10.1353/cml.2007.0002Google Scholar
Elder, C., Erlam, R., and Philp, J. (2007). Explicit language knowledge and focus on form: Options and obstacles for TESOL teacher trainees. In Fotos, S. and Nassaji, H., eds., Form-Focused Instruction and Teacher Education: Studies in Honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 225–240). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elkind, D. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child Development, 38(4), 1025–1034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elley, W. B., and Mangubhai, E. (1981). The Impact of a Book Flood in Fiji Primary Schools. Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 91–126. doi:10.1017/S0272263100014698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 305–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310505014XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., and Wulff, S. (2015). Usage-based approaches in second language acquisition. In VanPatten, B. and Williams, J., eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition, pp. 75–93. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Instructed Second Language Acquisition: A Literature Review. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 83–108.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2008). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2012). Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., and Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr161oaGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R. (2008). What do you researchers know about language teaching? Bridging the gap between SLA research and language pedagogy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501220802158958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R. (2013). Listing and comparing tasks in the language classroom: Examples of Willis and Willis’s (2007) taxonomy in practice. The New Zealand Language Teacher, 39, 7–14.Google Scholar
Erlam, R. (2017). Is it ok to use Kahoot for assessment in the language classroom? Language Assessment Matters, 8, 3–5. Retrieved from www.altaanz.org/uploads/5/9/0/8/5908292/altaanz_newsletter_issue_8_october_2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R., and Ellis, R. (2018). Task-based language teaching for beginner-level learners of L2 French: An exploratory study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R., and Pimentel-Hellier, M. (2017). Opportunities to attend to language form in the adolescent near-beginner foreign language classroom. Language Awareness, 26(2), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1314487Google Scholar
Feser, J. (2015). The disruptive nature of mobile learning. In Udell, C. and Woodill, G., eds., Mastering Mobile Learning: Tips and Techniques for Success (pp. 21–30). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Firth, A., and Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. doi:10.2307/329302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, A., and Wagner, J. (2007). Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–4781.2007.00670.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschi, V. (2017). Exploring Plurilingualism in Fan Fiction: ELF Users as Creative Writers. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Fredericks, J., Blumenfeld, P., and Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederikson, N., and Cline, T. (2002). Special Educational Needs, Inclusion and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, M., and Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625–635. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, Interaction and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gass, S.M., and Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.03gasCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.M., and Selinker, L. (2001). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 2012. Foreword. In Reinders, H., ed., Digital Games in Language Learning and Teaching (pp. xii–xiv). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gibbons, P. (2007). Mediating academic language learning through classroom discourse. In Cummins, J., and Davison, C., eds., International Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 701–718). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Goetz, T., Ludtke, O., Nett, U. E., Keller, M. M., and Lipnevich, A. A. (2013). Characteristics of teaching and students’ emotions in the classroom: Investigating differences across domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, S. (2012). Inclusive academic language teaching in New Zealand: History and responses. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32(3), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A. (2014). Exploring Language Assessment and Testing: Language in Action. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hadfield, J., and Dörnyei, Z. (2013). Motivating Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., and Pullen, P. C. (2009). Exceptional Learners: An Introduction to Special Education, 11th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Harley, B., and Swain, M. (1978). An analysis of the verb system used by young learners of French. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 3, 35–79.Google Scholar
Harmer, J. (2012). Essential Teacher Knowledge: Core Concepts in English Language Teaching. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Hartup, W. W. (1989). Social relationships and their developmental significance. American Psychologist, 44(2), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.120Google Scholar
Hartup, W. W. (2009). Critical issues and theoretical viewpoints. In Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M. and Laursen, B., eds., Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships and Groups (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockly, N., and Dudeney, G. (2017). Digital learning in 2020. In Carrier, M., Damerow, R. M., and Bailey, K. M., eds., Digital Language Learning and Teaching: Research, Theory, and Practice (pp. 235–246). New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, N. H., and Link, H. (2012). Translanguaging and transnational literacies in multilingual classrooms: A biliteracy lens. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.658016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaliampos, J., and Schmidt, T. (2014). Web 2.0 tasks in action: EFL learning in the U.S. Embassy School election project 2012. American Studies Journal, 58. Online: www.asjournal.org/58–2014/efl-learning-in-the-u-s-embassy-school-election-project–2012/Google Scholar
Kang, S.-J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004Google Scholar
Keenan, J. M., and MacWhinney, B. (1987). Understanding the relationship between comprehension and production. In Dechert, H. W. and Raupach, M., eds., Psycholinguistic Models of Production (pp. 150–155). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Kormos, J., Kiddle, T., and Csizér, K. (2011). Systems of goals, attitudes and self-related beliefs in second language-learning motivation. Applied Linguistics, 32(5), 495–516. doi:10.1093/applin/amr019Google Scholar
Kormos, J., and Smith, A. M. (2012). Teaching Languages to Students with Specific Learning Differences. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile assisted language learning. In Chapelle, C. A., ed., The Concise Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0768.pub2Google Scholar
Kurth-Buchholz, E. (2011). Schülermitbestimmung aus Sicht von Schülern und Lehrern: Eine vergleichende Untersuchung an Gymnasien in Brandenberg und Nordrheim-Westfalen . Munster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Lambert, C., Philp, J., and Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665–680.Google Scholar
Landrum, T. J., and McDuffie, K. A. (2010). Learning styles in the age of differentiated instruction. Exceptionality, 18(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903462441Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., and Beckett, T. G. (2009). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 42(4), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809990048Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., and Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, 3rd ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., and Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laursen, B. (2010). Capturing the peer context: The paradox of progress. Journal of Adolescence, 33(6), 897–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.08.008Google Scholar
Laursen, B. and Hartup, W. W. (2002). The origins of reciprocity and social exchange in friendships. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 95, 27–40. doi:10.1002/cd.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.-A. (2006). Respecifying display questions: Interactional resources for language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 691–713. doi:10.2307/40264304Google Scholar
Legutke, M. (2012). Teaching teenagers. In Burns, A. and Richards, J., eds., The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (2002). Language development and identity: Multiple timescales in the social ecology of learning. In Kramsch, C., ed., Language and Language Socialization Acquisition (pp. 68–87). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lerner, R., and Steinberg, L., eds. (2009). Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, 2nd ed., Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, vi–vii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, C. (2016). English as an additional language: A genealogy of language-in-education policies and reflections on research trajectories. Language and Education, 30(2), 158–174.Google Scholar
Li, J. (2020). Development and validation of second language online reading strategies inventory. Computers and Education, 145, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103733Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (2014). Making the minutes count in L2 teaching. Language Awareness, 23(1–2), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P., and Halter, R. (1989). Evaluation of ESL Learning Regular and Experimental Programs in Four New Brunswick School Districts: 1987–88 (Vol. 2). Research report prepared for the Ministry of Education of New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., Halter, R. H., White, J., and Horst, M. (2002). Comprehension-based learning: The limits of ‘do it yourself’. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(3), 427–64. doi:10.3138/cmlr.58.3.427Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., and Spada, N. (2006). How Languages Are Learned, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Fisher, L., Forbes, K., and Evans, M. (2017). The knowledge base of teaching in linguistically diverse contexts: Ten grounded principles of multilingual classroom pedagogy for EAL. Language and Intercultural Communication, 17(4), 378–395.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(3), 361–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S., and Reinders, H. (2011). Key Concepts in Second Language Acquisition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R., and Kramsch, C., eds., Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K., eds., Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., and Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520Google Scholar
Mackey, A., and Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Mackey, A., ed., Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin-Beltrán, M., Chen, P.-J., Guzman, N., and Merrills, K. A. (2016). How adolescents use social discourse to open space for language learning. In Sato, M. and Ballinger, S., eds., Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical Potential and Research Agenda (pp. 319–348). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.13marGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Alvarez, P. (2017). Language multiplicity and dynamism: Emergent bilinguals. Taking ownership of language use in a hybrid curricular space. International Multilingual Research Journal, 11(4), 255–276. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-5982-7.ch010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McColl, H. 2005. Foreign language learning and inclusion: Who? Why? What?– and How? Support for Learning 20(3), 103–108.Google Scholar
McDevitt, T. M., and Ormond, J. E. (2013). Child Development and Education, 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
McDonough, K. (2004). Learner–learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, B., and Sørensen, B. H. (2009). Designing serious games for computer assisted language learning – A framework for development and analysis. In Kankaanranta, M. and Neittaanmäki, P., eds., Design and Use of Serious Games. Intelligent Systems, Control, and Automation: Science and Engineering (pp. 69–82). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–1-4020–9496-5_5Google Scholar
Ministry of Education, New Zealand (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., and Friedman, D. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. F. and Bourne, L. E., eds., Foreign Language Learning: Psycholinguistic Studies on Training and Retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MPFS: Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest, eds. (2018). JIM-Studie 2018: Jugend, Information, Medien. Accessed from www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2018/Studie/JIM2018_Gesamt.pdfGoogle Scholar
MPFS: Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest, eds. (2019). JIM-Studie 2019: Jugend, Information, Medien. Accessed from www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2019/JIM_2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2006). The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF project. In Muñoz, C., ed., Age and the Rate of Foreign Language Learning (pp. 1–40). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A., and Van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 377–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588028Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. doi:10.1353/cml.2006.0049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2011). My ideal vocabulary teaching course. In Macalister, J. and Nation, I. S. P., eds., Case Studies in Language Curriculum Design (pp. 51–62). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., and Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curriculum Design. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Noels, K. (2001). New orientations in language learning motivation: Towards a model of intrinsic extrinsic and integrative orientations and motivations. In Dörnyei, Z. and Robinson, P., eds., Motivation and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 43–68). Honolulu, HI: The University of Hawaii: Second Language and Curriculum Centre.Google Scholar
Noels, K., Pelletier, L. G., Clement, R., and Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57–85. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00111Google Scholar
O’Donnell, A. M. (2006). The role of peers and group learning. In Alexander, P. A. and Winnie, P. H., eds., Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2nd ed. (pp. 781–802). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2007). Meaningful L2 practice in foreign language classrooms: A cognitive-interactionist SLA perspective. In DeKeyser, R., ed., Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology (pp. 180–207). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulston, C. B., and Bruder, M. N. (1976). Teaching English as a Second Language: Techniques and Procedures. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Pegrum, M. (2014). Mobile Learning: Languages, Literacies and Cultures. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pegrum, M. (2019). Mobile Lenses on Learning: Languages and Literacies on the Move. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pegrum, M., Dudeney, G., and Hockly, N. (2018). Digital literacies revisited. European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 7(2), 3–24.Google Scholar
Philp, J. (2016). Epilogue. In Sato, M. and Ballinger, S., eds., Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical Potential and Research Agenda (pp. 319–348). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45Google Scholar
Philp, J., Adams, R., and Iwashita, N. (2013). Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philp, J., and Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philp, J., Walter, S., and Basturkmen, H. (2010). Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: What factors foster a focus on form? Language Awareness, 19(4), 261–279.Google Scholar
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816Google Scholar
Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/Google Scholar
Randler, C., and Wicke, R. (2014). Von Eulen und Lerchen – Zum Sclafverhalten von Jugendlichen. Fremdsprache Deutsch, 51, 15–17. https://doi.org/10.37307/j.2194–1823.2014.51.05Google Scholar
Redecker, C., and Punie, Y. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigcompEdu (No. JRC107466). Publications Office of the European Union. http://dx.doi.org/10.2760/159770Google Scholar
Reinders, H., ed. (2012). Digital Games in Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reinders, H., and Stockwell, G. (2017). Computer-assisted SLA. In Loewen, S. and Sato, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (pp. 361–375). New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, J. (2019). Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis, and social networking. Language Teaching, 52(1), 1–39. https://doi:10.1017/S0261444818000356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riemer, C. (2010). Motivierung. In Krumm, H.-J., Fandrych, C., Hufeisen, B., and Riemer, C., eds., Deutsch als Fremd- und Zweitsprache: Ein internationales Handbuch (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft [HSK] 2) (pp. 1152–1157). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., Tracy, J. L., Gosling, S. D., and Potter, J. (2002). Global self-esteem across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 17(3), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882–7974.17.3.423Google Scholar
Roffwarg, H. P., Muzio, J. N., and Dement, W. C. (1966). Ontogenetic development of the human sleep dream cycle. Science, 152(3722), 604–618. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.152.3722.604Google Scholar
Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.134.2.223Google Scholar
Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2007). Classroom interactions: Exploring the practices of high- and low-expectation teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X101601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2015). Becoming a High Expectation Teacher: Raising the Bar. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rubie-Davies, C. M., Peterson, E. R., Sibley, C. G., and Rosenthal, R. (2015). A teacher expectation intervention: Modelling the practices of high expectation teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.003Google Scholar
Russell, J., and Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the learning of L2 grammar. In Norris, J. and Ortega, L., eds., Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 309–365). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Saito, K., and Hanzawa, K. (2016). Developing second language oral ability in foreign language classrooms: The role of the length and focus of instruction and individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 813–840. Doi:10.1017/S0142716415000259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomo, D. (2014). Deutschland, Deutschlernen und Deutschunterricht: Aus der Sicht von Jugendlichen und Lehrkräften in verschiedenen Ländern weltweit, eine empirische Studie. Retrieved from www.goethe.de/resources/files/pdf31/deutschlernen_18_12_2014_web.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sato, M., and Ballinger, S. (2012). Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-methodology examination. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.639884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauro, S. (2012). Computer‐mediated communication and second language development. In Chapelle, C. A., ed., The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0180Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (1988). ‘Private speech’: Evidence for second language learning strategies during the ‘silent period’. Journal of Child Language, 15(3), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012575Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In Schmidt, R. (ed.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (pp. 1–65). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P., ed., Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning Teaching: A Guidebook for English Language Teachers. Oxford: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal Learning Environments to Promote Student Engagement. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Shernoff, D. J., Ruzek, E. A., and Sinha, S. (2017). The influence of the high school classroom environment on learning as mediated by student engagement. Psychology International, 38(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316666413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, D., and Jean, G. (2011). An exploration of L2 teachers’ use of pedagogical interventions devised to draw L2 learners’ attention to form. Language Learning, 61(3), 759–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9922.2011.00656.xGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spada, N. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Current status and future prospects. In Cummins, J. and Davison, C., eds., International Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 271–288). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Spada, N., and Lightbown, P. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly, 42(2), 181–207. doi:10.2307/40264447Google Scholar
Stern, H. H. (1985). The time factor and compact course development. TESL Canada Journal, 3(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v3i1.471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–9922.00179Google Scholar
Sumter, S., Bokhorst, C., and Westemberg, P. M. (2009). Social fears during adolescence: Is there an increase in distress and avoidance? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(7), 897–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.05.004Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. and Madden, C., eds., Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook, G. and Seidhofer, B., eds., Principles and Practice in the Study of Language: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Lantolf, J. P., ed., Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Hinkel, E., ed., Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 471–483). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation Is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Tognini, R. (2008). Interaction in languages other than English classes in Western Australian primary and secondary schools: Theory, practice and perceptions. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/26Google Scholar
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., and Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203Google Scholar
Toth, P. D. (2006). Processing instruction and a role for output in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 56(2), 319–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023–8333.2006.00349.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. Retrieved from www.scribd.com/doc/37626440/UNESCO-Education-Inclusion-Policy-GuidelinesGoogle Scholar
Ushoida, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Dörnyei, Z. and Ushoida, E., eds., Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp. 215–228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., and Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–296. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-010–9127–6Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In Lantolf, J. P., ed., Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, pp. 245–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Languages Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., Williams, J., Rott, S., and Overstreet, M. (2004). Form–Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vatansever, A. (2018). A comparison of the influence of teacher-generated and learner-generated content on learner engagement in oral tasks: A Turkish EFL high school context. Unpublished Master’s dissertation, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
Vötter, S. and Treter, C. (2009). Die deutsche Sprache in China und die PASCH-Initiative. Fremdsprache Deutsch Sonderheft 1: Schulen: Partner der Zukunft [Special issue: Schools: Partners of the future], 33–36.Google Scholar
Wei, L. (2018). Investigating the influence of age and language aptitude on the implicit and explicit knowledge of ESL learners. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., and Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–0663.96.2.195Google Scholar
Wilden, E. (2013). Handcrafting video clips to foster audio-visual literacy in the EFL classroom. WorldCALL Glasgow 10–13 July 2013 Papers, 369–372.Google Scholar
Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49(4), 583–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023–8333.00103Google Scholar
Willis, D., and Willis, J. (2007). Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, P.-H. N., and Marek, M. W. (2018). Developing intercultural competence via social media engagement in a language learning framework. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 46.Google Scholar
Zheng, B., Yim, S., and Warschauer, M. (2018). Social media in the writing classroom and beyond. In Liontas, J. I. and DelliCarpini, M., eds., The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0555Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Rosemary Erlam, University of Auckland, Jenefer Philp, Lancaster University, Diana Feick, University of Auckland
  • Book: Teaching Languages to Adolescent Learners
  • Online publication: 17 September 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869812.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Rosemary Erlam, University of Auckland, Jenefer Philp, Lancaster University, Diana Feick, University of Auckland
  • Book: Teaching Languages to Adolescent Learners
  • Online publication: 17 September 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869812.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Rosemary Erlam, University of Auckland, Jenefer Philp, Lancaster University, Diana Feick, University of Auckland
  • Book: Teaching Languages to Adolescent Learners
  • Online publication: 17 September 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869812.011
Available formats
×