Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:07:21.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Play

from Part III - Interaction and Inclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2022

By
Annukka Pursi
Edited by
Amelia Church  and
Amanda Bateman
Amelia Church
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Amanda Bateman
Affiliation:
Swansea University
Get access

Summary

Belonging is a concept with positive meaning that relates to togetherness and social fellowship. Belonging can be understood at different levels: most immediately it relates to close relationships and attachment, i.e. belonging to a family or a group of peers. In a wider perspective, belonging deals with being a part of society and its culture and language(s). For a child who enters the preschool, belonging is essential for the child’s wellbeing, development and learning. Hence, many preschool curricula emphasize the importance of belonging. In the Swedish preschool curriculum belonging is foremost related to the child’s development of responsibility and solidarity as a part of its socialization in civics and democracy. The accomplishment of belonging can be challenging, because the conditions for children’s affiliation at preschool differ as they often enter with diverse experiences – linguistically, culturally and socially. A crucial point is the educators’ attitude and view of the child and her/his abilities. This chapter aims to highlight and discuss how belonging can be accomplished in everyday practice at preschool. The data details how teachers and peers contribute to a child’s sense of belonging in various activities or situations; for example, welcoming as a joint accomplishment, embodied greetings, making each child visible and respecting children’s play framework.

Keywords

belongingpreschool practicesocial frameworkembodied greetings
Type
Chapter
Information
Talking with Children
A Handbook of Interaction in Early Childhood Education
 , pp. 309 - 330
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahnert, L., Gunnar, M. R. G., Lamb, M. E., and Barthel, M. (2004). Transition to childcare: associations with infant-mother attachment, infant negative emotion, and cortisol elevations. Child Development, 75, 639–650.Google Scholar
Bateman, A. (2015). Conversation Analysis and Early Childhood Education: the co-production of knowledge and relationships (pp. 41–66). London: Ashgate/Routledge.Google Scholar
Bateman, A., Danby, S., and Howard, J. (2013). Living in a broken world: how young children’s well-being is supported through playing out their earthquake experiences. International Journal of Play, 2(3), 202–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, G. (1976). A theory of play and fantasy. In Bruner, J. S., Jolly, A., and Sylva, K. (eds.), Play – Its Role in Development and Evolution (pp. 119–129). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Björk-Willén, P. (2007). Participation in multilingual preschool play: shadowing and crossing as interactional resources. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 2133–2158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björk-Willén, P., and Cromdal, J. (2009). When education seeps into ‘free play’: how preschool children accomplish multilingual education. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1493–1518.Google Scholar
Brennan, M. (2007). A culture of tenderness: teachers’ socialisation practices in group care settings. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(1), 137–146.Google Scholar
Bruce, T., Hakkarainen, P., and Bredikyte, M. (eds.). (2017). The Routledge International Handbook of Early Childhood Play. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, C. W., and Weatherall, A. (2006). ‘No we’re not playing families’: membership categorization in children’s play. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(4), 441–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cekaite, A., and Kvist Holm, M. (2017). The comforting touch: tactile intimacy and talk in managing children’s distress. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(2), 109–127.Google Scholar
Cheng, M.-F., and Johnson, J. E. (2010). Research on children’s play: analysis of developmental and early education journals from 2005 to 2007. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(4), 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb-Moore, C. (2012). ‘Pretend I was mummy’: children’s production of authority and subordinance in their pretend play interaction during disputes. In Danby, S. and Theobald, M. (eds.), Disputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People (pp. 85–118). Bradford: Emerald Insight.Google Scholar
Corsaro, W. A. (1979). ‘We’re friends, right?’ Children’s use of access rituals in a nursery school. Language in Society, 8, 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalgren, S. (2017). Questions and answers, a seesaw and embodied action: how children respond in informing sequences. In Bateman, A. and Church, A. (eds.) Children’s Knowledge-in-Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 37–56). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Dalli, C., White, E. J., Rockel, J., et al. (2011). Quality early childhood education for under-two-year-olds: What should it look like? A literature review. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Danby, S., and Baker, C. D. (2000). Unravelling the fabric of social order in block area. In Hester, S. and Francis, D. (eds.), Local Educational Order: Ethnomethodological Studies of Knowledge in Action (pp. 91–140). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Datler, W., Ereky-Stevens, K., Hover-Reisner, N., and Malmberg, L. E. (2012). Toddlers’ transition to out-of-home day care: settling into a new care environment. Infant Behavior and Development, 35(3), 439–451.Google Scholar
Degotardi, S., and Pearson, E. (2009). Relationship theory in the nursery: attachment and beyond. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10, 144–155.Google Scholar
De León, L. (2012). Language socialization and multiparty participation frameworks. In Duranti, A., Ochs, E., and Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization (pp. 81–111). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eddowes, E. A. (1991). Review of research: the benefits of solitary play. Dimensions, 20(1), 31–34.Google Scholar
Farver, J. A. M. (1992). Communicating shared meaning in social pretend play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnish National Agency for Education. (2018). National core curriculum for early childhood education and care 2018. Regulations and guidelines.Google Scholar
Fleer, M. (2015). Pedagogical positioning in play – Teachers being inside and outside of children’s imaginary play. Early Child Development and Care, 185, 1801–1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C. E., and Stickle, T. (2012). Securing recipiency in workplace meetings: multimodal practices. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 11–30.Google Scholar
Garvey, C., and Berndt, R. (1975). The organization of pretend play. Chicago: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (2007). Participation and embodied action in preadolescent girls’ assessment activity. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hännikäinen, M., and Munter, H. (2018). Toddlers’ play in early childhood education settings. In Smith, P. K. and Roopnarine, J. L. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Play: Developmental and Disciplinary Perspectives (pp. 491–510). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hännikäinen, M., Singer, E., and van Oers, B. (2013). Promoting play for a better future. Early Childhood Education Journal, 21(2), 165–171.Google Scholar
Hutchby, I. (2005). ‘Active listening’: formulations and the elicitation of feelings-talk in child counselling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(3), 303–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, J. (2011). Caregivers’ playfulness and infants’ emotional stress during transitional time. Early Child Development and Care, 181(10), 1397–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, J. (2013). Teachers’ roles in infants’ play and its changing nature in a dynamic group care context. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 187–198.Google Scholar
Kalliala, M. (2014). Toddlers as both more and less competent social actors in Finnish day care centres. Early Years, 34(1), 4–17.Google Scholar
Karrebæk, M. S. (2011). It farts: the situated management of social organization in a kindergarten peer group. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2911–2931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, M. (2012). Interaction among children. In Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 511–532). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kidwell, M. (2013). Availability as a trouble source in directive-response sequences. In Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., and Sidnell, J. (eds.), Conversational Repair and Human Understanding (pp. 234–260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kidwell, M., and Zimmerman, D. (2006). ‘Observability’ in the interactions of very young children. Communication Monographs, 73, 1–28.Google Scholar
Klein, P. S., Kraft, R. R., and Shohet, C. (2010). Behaviour patterns in daily mother–child separations: possible opportunities for stress reduction. Early Child Development and Care, 180(3), 387–396.Google Scholar
Kontos, S. (1999). Preschool teachers’ talk, roles and activity settings during free play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 14(3), 363–382.Google Scholar
Kyratzis, A. (2007). Using the social organizational affordances of pretend play in American preschool girls’ interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 321–352.Google Scholar
Lipponen, L. (2018). Constituting cultures of compassion in early childhood educational settings. In Gravis, S. and Eriksen Ødegaard, E. (eds.), Nordic Dialogues on Children and Families (pp. 39–50). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lobman, C. L. (2006). Improvisation: an analytic tool for examining teacher-child interaction in the early childhood classroom. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Løkken, G. (2000a). Tracing the social style of toddler peers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 163–177.Google Scholar
Løkken, G. (2000b). The playful quality of the toddling ‘style’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 531–542.Google Scholar
Mehus, S. (2011). Creating contexts for actions: multimodal practices for managing children’s conduct in the childcare classroom. In Streeck, J., Godwin, C., and LeBaron, C. (eds.), Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World (pp. 123–136). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Molinari, L., Cigala, A., Corsano, P., and Venturelli, E. (2017). Observing children’s triadic play. In Bruce, T., Hakkarainen, P., and Bredikyte, M. (eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Early Childhood Play (pp. 216–229). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L. (2013). Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: participatory democracy debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 39–68.Google Scholar
Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, J. (2010). Reconstructing professionalism in ECEC: the case for the ‘critically reflective emotional professional’. Early Years, 30(2), 119–133.Google Scholar
Paananen, M., and Rainio, A. P. (2019). Micro-policies of adult-child joint play in the context of the Finnish ECEC system. In Alcock, S. and Stobbs, N., Rethinking Play as Pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peräkylä, A., and Sorjonen, M.-J. (eds.). (2012). Emotion in Interaction. London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pramling Samuelsson, I., and Fleer, M. (eds.). (2008). Play and learning in early childhood settings: international perspectives. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Pursi, A. (2019a). Intersubjectivity in adult-child play interaction. Institutional multi-party interaction and pedagogical practice in a toddler classroom. Ph.D. thesis, University of Helsinki. Helsinki: Unigrafia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pursi, A. (2019b). Play in adult-child interaction: institutional multi-party interaction and pedagogical practice in a toddler classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 136–150.Google Scholar
Pursi, A., Lipponen, L., and Sajaniemi, N. (2018). Emotional and playful stance taking in joint play between adults and very young children. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 18, 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyle, A., DeLuca, C., and Danniels, E. (2017). A scoping review of research on play-based pedagogies in kindergarten education. The Review of Education, 5(3), 311–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, K. (1993). The pragmatics of play: interactional strategies during children’s pretend play. Pragmatics, 3(3), 259–282.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J. (2011). The epistemics of make-believe. In Stivers, T., Mondada, L., and Steensig, J. (eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation (pp. 131–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, E., Nederend, M., Penninx, L., Tajik, M., and Boom, J. (2014). The teacher’s role in supporting young children’s level of play engagement. Early Child Development and Care, 184(8), 1233–1249.Google Scholar
Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2009). Conceptualising progression in the pedagogy of play and sustained shared thinking in early childhood education: a Vygotskian perspective. Educational & Child Psychology, 26(2), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., and Sidnell, J. (2016). Proposals for activity collaboration. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(2), 148–166.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., Sidnell, J., and Bergen, C. (2018). Children’s responses to questions in peer interaction: a window into the ontogenesis of interactional competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 124, 14–30.Google Scholar
Trawick-Smith, J., and Dziurgot, T. (2011). ‘Good-fit’ teacher–child play interactions and the subsequent autonomous play of preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 110–123.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (2011). What young children give to their learning, making education work to sustain a community and its culture. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19, 173–193.Google Scholar
Tykkyläinen, T., and Laakso, M. (2010). Five-year-old girls negotiating pretend play: proposals with the Finnish particle jooko. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 5(3), 6–18.Google Scholar
Whalen, M. R. (1995). Working toward play: complexity in children’s fantasy activities. Language in Society, 24, 315–347.Google Scholar
White, J., Ellis, F., O’Malley, A., Rockel, J., Stover, S., and Toso, M. (2009). Play and learning in Aotearoa/New Zealand early childhood education. In Pramling Samuelsson, I. and Fleer, M. (eds.), Play and Learning in Early Childhood Settings: International Perspectives (pp. 19–49). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×