Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-j5c6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-04T00:31:09.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Mapping genetic interactions across many phenotypes in metazoan cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

By
Christina Laufer ,
Maximilian Billmann  and
Michael Boutros
Edited by
Florian Markowetz  and
Michael Boutros
Christina Laufer
Affiliation:
Heidelberg University
Maximilian Billmann
Affiliation:
Heidelberg University
Michael Boutros
Affiliation:
German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg
Florian Markowetz
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute
Michael Boutros
Affiliation:
German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg
Get access

Summary

Interactions between genes can be experimentally determined by combining multiple mutations and identifying combinations where the resulting phenotype differs from the expected one. Such genetic interactions, for example measured in yeast for cell proliferation and growth phenotypes, provided intricate insights into the genetic architecture and interplay of pathways. Due to the lack of comprehensive deletion libraries, similar experiments in higher eukaryotic cells have been challenging. Recently, we and others described methods to perform systematic, comprehensive double-perturbation analyses in Drosophila and human cells using RNA interference. We also introduced methods to use multiple phenotypes to map genetic interactions across a broad spectrum of processes.

This chapter focuses on the systematic mapping of genetic interactions and the use of image-based phenotypes to improve genetic interaction calling. It also describes experimental approaches for the analysis of genetic interactions in human cells and discusses concepts to expand genetic interaction mapping towards a genomic scale.

A short history of genetic interaction analysis

Using quantitative traits to map genetic interactions has a long tradition in Drosophila. In the 1960s and 1970s, Dobzhansky, Rendel, and others used externally visible pheno-types or overall fitness to study non-mendelian inheritance and dissect the heritability of complex traits (Fig. 3.1a). One of the underlying assumptions was that genetic loci in the Drosophila genome interact to shape complex phenotypes or buffer detrimental alleles.

In 1965, Dobzhansky and colleagues analyzed epistatic interactions between the components of genetic variants in Drosophila. They crossed flies carrying mutant alleles into a wild-type background obtained from a natural habitat and found that the combination of particular chromosomes showed synthetic sick phenotypes, whereas both chromosomes alone did not. This for the first time demonstrated the presence of bi-chromosomal synthetic interactions in Drosophila populations. Similarly, Rendel and colleagues demonstrated the existence of epistatic modifiers in Drosophila by analysis of scute alleles, which reduce the number of scutellar bristles on the dorsal thorax from four to an average of one.

Type
Chapter
Information
Systems Genetics
Linking Genotypes and Phenotypes
 , pp. 36 - 50
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelsson, E., Sandmann, T., Horn, T., Boutros, M., Huber, W., et al. (2011), ‘Extracting quantitative genetic interaction phenotypes from matrix combinatorial RNAI’, BMC Bioinformatics 12, 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakal, C., Linding, R., Llense, F., Heffern, E., Martin-Blanco, E., et al. (2008), ‘Phosphorylation networks regulating jnk activity in diverse genetic backgrounds’, Science 322(5900), 453–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartscherer, K., Pelte, N., Ingelfinger, D., & Boutros, M., (2006), ‘Secretion of wnt ligands requires evi, a conserved transmembrane protein’, Cell 125 (3), 523–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassik, M. C., Kampmann, M., Lebbink, R. J., Wang, S., Hein, M. Y. et al. (2013), ‘A systematic mammalian genetic interaction map reveals pathways underlying ricin susceptibility’, Cell 152 (4), 909–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Aroya, S., Coombes, C., Kwok, T., O'Donnell, K. A., Boeke, J. D. et al. (2008), ‘Toward a comprehensive temperature-sensitive mutant repository of the essential genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae’, Mol Cell 30 (2), 248–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björklund, M., Taipale, M., Varjosalo, M., Saharinen, J., Lahdenperä, J. et al. (2006), ‘Identification of pathways regulating cell size and cell-cycle progression by RNAI’, Nature 439(7079), 1009–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutros, M., Kiger, A. A., Armknecht, S., Kerr, K., Hild, M., et al. (2004), ‘Genome-wide rnai analysis of growth and viability in Drosophila cells’, Science 303(5659), 832–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, G. W. (2013), ‘Inferring gene function and network organization in Drosophila signaling by combined analysis of pleiotropy and epistasis’, G3 (Bethesda) 3 (5), 807–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, F. P., Cagney, G., Krogan, N. J. & Shields, D. C. (2008), ‘Optimal stepwise experimental design for pairwise functional interaction studies’, Bioinformatics 24 (23), 2733–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, S. R.,Miller, K. M.,Maas, N. L., Roguev, A., Fillingham, J., et al. (2007), ‘Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map’, Nature 446(7137), 806–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, S. R., Roguev, A., & Krogan, N. J. (2010), ‘Quantitative genetic interaction mapping using the E-MAP approach’, Methods Enzymol 470, 205–31.Google Scholar
Costanzo, M., Baryshnikova, A., Bellay, J., Kim, Y., Spear, E. D. et al. (2010), ‘The genetic landscape of a cell’, Science 327(5964), 425–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, S. J., Costanzo, M., Baryshnikova, A., Andrews, B., & Boone, C., (2009), ‘Systematic mapping of genetic interaction networks’, Annu Rev Genet 43, 601–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, A., & Perrimon, N., (2006), ‘A functional RNAI screen for regulators of receptor tyrosine kinase and ERK signalling’, Nature 444(7116), 230–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, T., Sandmann, T., Fischer, B., Axelsson, E., Huber, W., et al. (2011), ‘Mapping of signaling networks through synthetic genetic interaction analysis by RNAI’, Nat Methods 8 (4), 341–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampmann, M., Bassik, M. C. & Weissman, J. S. (2013), ‘Integrated platform for genome-wide screening and construction of high-density genetic interaction maps in mammalian cells’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110 (25), E2317–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittler, R., Surendranath, V., Heninger, A. -K.Slabicki, M., Theis, M., et al. (2007), ‘Genome-wide resources of endoribonuclease-prepared short interfering RNAS for specific loss-of-function studies’, Nat Methods 4 (4), 337–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzmin, E., Sharifpoor, S., Baryshnikova, A., Costanzo, M., Myers, C. L. et al. (2014), ‘Synthetic genetic array analysis for global mapping of genetic networks in yeast’, Methods Mol Biol 1205, 143–68.Google Scholar
Laufer, C., Fischer, B., Billmann, M., Huber, W., & Boutros, M., (2013), ‘Mapping genetic interactions in human cancer cells with RNAI and multiparametric phenotyping’, Nat Methods 10 (5), 427–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, C., Fischer, B., Huber,W. &Boutros, M., (2014), ‘Measuring genetic interactions in human cells by RNAI and imaging’, Nat Protoc 9 (10), 2341–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, P., Kuttenkeuler, D., Gesellchen, V., Zeidler, M. P. & Boutros, M., (2005), ‘Identification of JAK/STAT signalling components by genome-wide RNA interference’, Nature 436(7052), 871–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roguev, A., Talbot, D., Negri, G. L., Shales, M., Cagney, G., et al. (2013), ‘Quantitative geneticinteraction mapping in mammalian cells’, Nat Methods 10 (5), 432–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuldiner, M., Collins, S. R., Thompson, N. J., Denic, V., Bhamidipati, A., et al. (2005), ‘Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile’, Cell 123 (3), 507–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St Johnston, D., (2002), ‘The art and design of genetic screens: Drosophila melanogaster’, Nat Rev Genet 3 (3), 176–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, A. H., Evangelista, M., Parsons, A. B., Xu, H., Bader, G. D. et al. (2001), ‘Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants’, Science 294(5550), 2364–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, A. H. Y., Lesage, G., Bader, G. D., Ding, H., Xu, H., et al. (2004), ‘Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network’, Science 303(5659), 808–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wassarman, D. A., Therrien, M., & Rubin, G. M. (1995), ‘The Ras signaling pathway in Drosophila’, Curr Opin Genet Dev 5 (1), 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winzeler, E. A., Shoemaker, D. D., Astromoff, A., Liang, H., Anderson, K., et al. (1999), ‘Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis’, Science 285(5429), 901–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×