Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T05:32:14.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Venture launch and growth as a status-building process

from Part III - The role of status in new industries and ventures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
M. Kim Saxton  and
Todd Saxton
Edited by
Jone L. Pearce
Jone L. Pearce
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access

Summary

“Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM.” This old adage sums up the advantage large established firms have in securing customers and sustaining their business. As a prototypical institution, IBM epitomizes the established organization that through longevity, size, and reputation is beyond reproach. New firms, in contrast, are status-challenged. They have no history, little name recognition, an unknown brand, and a lack of established resources to leverage. So how do new firms go about establishing legitimacy and securing status to go from being an unknown to a viable, growing entity?

New ventures face intimidating odds in the development phase. New venture research consistently documents high venture failure rates, even approaching eighty percent (Baum, Locke, and Smith, 2001; Cooper, Dunkelberg, and Woo, 1988). Founders often struggle with scarce resources including time, human capital, the physical and strategic resources required to turn ideas into commercialized products, and financial capital to develop and launch the emerging enterprise (Acs and Audretsch, 2003).

Type
Chapter
Information
Status in Management and Organizations , pp. 191 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acs, Z.Audretsch, D. 2003 Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and IntroductionNew YorkSpringerGoogle Scholar
Acs, Z.Audretsch, D. 2003 Innovation, market structure and firm sizeReview of Economics and Statistics 71 567Google Scholar
Aldrich, H.Auster, E. R. 1986 Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implicationsResearch in Organizational Behaviour 8 165Google Scholar
Allen, M.Davis, J.Saxton, M. K.Saxton, T. 2009
Baum, J. R.Locke, E. A.Smith, K. G. 2001 A multidimensional model of venture growthAcademy of Management Journal 44 292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, J.Oliver, C. 1991 Institutional linkages and organizational mortalityAdministrative Science Quarterly 36 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromiley, P.Flemming, L. 2002 Augier, M.March, J. G.The Economics of Choice, Change and Organization: Essays in Honour of Richard M. CyertCheltenhamEdward ElgarGoogle Scholar
Bruderl, J.Schussler, R. 1990 Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescenceAdministrative Science Quarterly 35 530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, J. A. 2000 How a VC does it; Bob Davoli is a hands-on investor, and so far he hasn’t picked a loser. Can he keep it up?BusinessWeek 96Google Scholar
Chen, X. P.Yao, X.Kotha, S. 2009 Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentation: A persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decisionsAcademy of Management Journal 52 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, N. C.Lewis, V. L. 1983 The five stages of small business growthHarvard Business Review30Google Scholar
Cooper, A. C.Dunkelberg, W. C.Woo, C. Y. 1988 Kirchoff, B. A.Long, W. A.McMullen, W. E.Vesper, K. H.Wetzel, W. E.Frontiers of Entrepreneurship ResearchWellesley, MABabson CollegeGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. G. 1983 The new product process: An empirically-based classification schemeR&D Management 13 1Google Scholar
Cooper, R. G. 1990 Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new productsBusiness Horizons 33 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deephouse, D. L.Carter, S. M. 2005 An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputationJournal of Management Studies 42 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollinger, M. J.Golden, P. A.Saxton, T. 1997 The effect of reputation on the decision to joint ventureStrategic Management Journal 18 1273.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowling, J.Pfeffer, J. 1975 Organisational legitimacy: Social values and organisational behaviorPacific Sociological Review 18 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsbach, K. D.Kramer, R. M. 2003 Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgmentsAcademy of Management Journal 46 283Google Scholar
Elston, J. A.Audretsch, D. B. 2009
Fichman, M.Levinthal, D. A. 1991 Honeymoons and the liability of adolescence: A new perspective on duration dependence in social and organizational relationshipsAcademy of Management Review 16 442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryxell, G.Wang, J. 1994 The Fortune corporate ‘reputation’ index: Reputation for what?Journal of Management 20 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, W. B.Carter, N. M. 2003 Acs, Z. J.Audretsch, D. B.Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and IntroductionNew YorkSpringerGoogle Scholar
Gersick, C. 1991 Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigmAcademy of Management Review 16 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985 Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddednessAmerican Journal of Sociology 91 481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, L. E. 1972 Evolution and revolution as organizations growHarvard Business Review 50 37Google Scholar
Hall, R. 1992 The strategic analysis of intangible resourcesStrategic Management Journal 13 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, M. T.Freeman, J. 1989 Structural inertia and organizational changeAmerican Sociological Review 49 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heugens, P. P. M. A. R.Lander, M. W. 2009 Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organizationAcademy of Management Journal 52 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M.Kim, B. K.Kim, H. 2009
King, B. G.Whetten, D. A. 2008 Rethinking the relationship between reputation and legitimacy: A social actor conceptualizationCorporate Reputation Review 11 192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, D.Goldfarb, B.Gera, A. 2009 Form or substance: The role of business plans in venture capital decision makingStrategic Management Journal 30 487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Z.Yang, H.Arya, B. 2009 Alliance partners and firm performance: Resource complementarity and status associationStrategic Management Journal 30 921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyles, M. A.Saxton, T.Watson, K. 2004 Venture survival in a transitional economyJournal of Management 30 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMillan, I. C.Zemann, L.Subbanarasimha, P. 1987 Criteria distinguishing successful ventures in the venture screening processJournal of Business Venturing 2 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P.Roberts, J. 1986 Relying on the information of interested partiesRand Journal of Economics 17 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. L.Ramirez, R. R.Branyiczki, I. 2001 Leadership and the pursuit of status: Effects of globalization and economic transformationMobley, W. S.McCall, M.Advances in Global Leadership II 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podolony, J. M. 1993 A status-based model of market competitionAmerican Journal of Sociology 98 829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podolny, J. M.Stuart, T. E.Hannan, M. T. 1996 Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991American Journal of Sociology 102 659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rindova, V. P.Fombrun, C. J. 1999 Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactionsStrategic Management Journal 20 6913.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxton, T. 1997 The effects of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomesAcademy of Management Journal 40 443Google Scholar
Saxton, T.Saxton, M. K. 2009
Scott, W. R. 2001 Institutions and OrganizationsThousand Oaks, CASageGoogle Scholar
Singh, J. V.Tucker, D. J.House, R. J. 1986 Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newnessAdministrative Science Quarterly 31 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. 1965 March, J.Handbook of OrganizationsChicagoRand McNallyGoogle Scholar
Venkataraman, S. 1997 Katz, J.Brockhaus, J.Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and GrowthGreenwich, CTJAI PressGoogle Scholar
Zacharakis, A. L.Meyer, G. D. 2000 The potential of actuarial decision models: Can they improve the venture capital investment decision?Journal of Business Venturing 15 323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J.Souitaris, V.Soh, P.Wong, P. 2008 A contingent model of network utilization in early financing of technology venturesEntrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 32 593Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×