Book contents
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Visions and Politics of Development
- 2 CEPAL as Idea Factory for Latin American Development: Intellectual and Political Influence, 1950–1990
- 3 The Arc of Development: Economists’ and Sociologists’ Quest for the State
- 4 From “Showcase” to “Failure”: Democracy and the Colombian Developmental State in the 1960s
- Part III Institutional Design: Infrastructural and Territorial Power
- Part IV Industry, Trade, and Growth: Economic Power
- Part V National and Civic Identities: Symbolic Power
- Part VI Conclusion
- Index
- References
2 - CEPAL as Idea Factory for Latin American Development: Intellectual and Political Influence, 1950–1990
from Part II - Visions and Politics of Development
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2018
Book contents
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Visions and Politics of Development
- 2 CEPAL as Idea Factory for Latin American Development: Intellectual and Political Influence, 1950–1990
- 3 The Arc of Development: Economists’ and Sociologists’ Quest for the State
- 4 From “Showcase” to “Failure”: Democracy and the Colombian Developmental State in the 1960s
- Part III Institutional Design: Infrastructural and Territorial Power
- Part IV Industry, Trade, and Growth: Economic Power
- Part V National and Civic Identities: Symbolic Power
- Part VI Conclusion
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and SpainThe Rise and Fall of the Developmental State, pp. 29 - 50Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Amin, Samir. Accumulation on a World Scale: A Critique of the Theory of Underdevelopment. Translated by Pearce, Brian. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Baer, Werner and Love, Joseph L., “Brazil’s EMBRAER: Institutional Entrepreneurship.” In Brazil’s Economy: An Institutional and Sectoral Approach, eds. Bauer, Werner et al., London: Routledge, 2017: 119–135.Google Scholar
Baer, Werner and Love, Joseph L., eds. Liberalization and its Consequences: A Comparative Perspective on Latin America and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bértola, Luis and Ocampo, José Antonio. The Economic Development of Latin America since Independence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourguignon, François. The Globalization of Inequality. Translated by Railton, Thomas Scott. Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Bulmer-Thomas, Victor, Coatsworth, John, and Cortes-Conde, Roberto, eds. Cambridge History of Latin America. Vol. 2: The Long Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Cano, Wilson. “Instituto de Economia da Unicamp: Notas Sobre sua Origem e Linhas Gerais de sua Evolução.” In Ensaios de História do Pensamento Econômico no Brasil Contemporâneo, eds. Szmrecsányi, Tamás and Da Silva Coelho, Francisco, São Paulo: Atlas, 2007: 199–209.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, Enrique, Ocampo, José Antonio, and Thorp, Rosemary, eds. An Economic History of Twentieth-Century Latin America. Vol. 3: Industrialization and the State in Latin America: The Postwar Years. New York: Palgrave, 2000.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. Empresário Industrial e Desenvolvimento Econômico no Brasil. São Paulo: Difusão Européia do Livro, 1964.Google Scholar
CELAM. “II Conferencia General del Episcopado Latinoamericano. Documentos Finales de Medellin.” 2017 www.celam.org/doc_conferencias/Documento_Conclusivo_Medellin.pdf (accessed December 2, 2017).Google Scholar
Coatsworth, John H. and Williamson, Jeffrey G.. “Always Protectionist? Latin American Tariffs from Independence to the Great Depression.” Journal of Latin American Studies, May , 2014: 205–232.Google Scholar
David, Thomas. Nationalisme économique et industrialization: L’expérience des pays de l’Est (1789–1939). Genève: Librairie Droz, 2009.Google Scholar
Dosman, Edgar J. The Life and Times of Raúl Prebisch. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC; Fernando Fajnzylber, principal author). Changing Production Patterns with Social Equity. Santiago, Chile: United Nations, 1990.Google Scholar
Fajnzylber, Fernando. La industrialización trunca de América Latina. México, DF: Nueva Imagen, 1983.Google Scholar
Fajnzylber, Fernando. “Industrialización en América Latina: De la ‘caja negra’ al ‘casillero vacío.’ Comparación de patrones contemporáneos de industrialización.” Cuadernos de la CEPAL No. 60. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas – CEPAL, 1990. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/27955 (accessed April 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Fernandez, Joaquin. “Neoestructuralismo y política económica: Entrevista a Osvaldo Sunkel.” Revista de Actualidad Política, Social y Cultural. 2011. www.redseca.cl/?p=2015 (accessed December 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Filippo, Armando di. Desarrollo y desigualdad social en la América Latina. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1981.Google Scholar
Filippo, Armando di. “La visión centro-periferia hoy.” Revista de la CEPAL, número extraordinario, October 1998: 175–185.Google Scholar
Foxley, Alejandro. Distribución del Ingreso. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1974.Google Scholar
Foxley, Alejandro and Óscar, Muñoz. “Redistribución del Ingreso, Crecimiento Económico y Estructura Social (El caso chileno).” El Trimestre Económico 40, 160(4): 905–936, Octubre–Diciembre 1973.Google Scholar
Furtado, Celso. Diagnosis of the Brazilian Crisis. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1965. [Portuguese original: Dialéctica do desenvolvimento, 1964.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtado, Celso. Letter to Love, Joseph L.. Author’s possession, Rio de Janeiro. August 8, 1996.Google Scholar
Graham, Lawrence. Civil Service Reform in Brazil: Principles versus Practice. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. Journeys Toward Progress: Studies of Economic Policy-making in Latin America. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1963.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Jack W. “Evolution and Revolution: Enduring Patterns and the Transformation of Latin American Bureaucracy.” In Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration, ed. Farazmand, Ali, New York: Marcel Dekker, 1991: 705–706.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Jack W. “Contemporary Research on Public Administration and Bureaucracies in Latin America.” LARR (IX, 1), Spring 1974.Google Scholar
Instituto Latinoamericano de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES), “Programa de Capacitación 1963 [through 1969].” ILPES Archive, CEPAL, 1969.Google Scholar
Instituto Latinoamericano de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES), Discusiones sobre Planificación: Informe de un seminario. Santiago, 6–14 de Julio de 1965. México: Siglo XXI, 1990 (1st edn. 1976).Google Scholar
Kubitschek, Juscelino. Mensagem ao Congresso Nacional: 1956. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1956.Google Scholar
Larrain, Felipe and Selowsky, Marcelo, eds. The Public Sector and the Latin American Crisis. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Leiva, Fernando Ignacio. Latin American Neostructuralism: The Contradictions of Post-Neoliberal Development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph L. “The Origins of Dependency Analysis.” Journal of Latin American Studies 22, 1: 143–168, February 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, Joseph L. Crafting the Third World: Theorizing Development in Romania and Brazil. Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph L. “Structuralism and Dependency in Peripheral Europe: Latin American Ideas in Spain and Portugal.” Latin American Research Review 39, 2, June 2004: 114–139.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph L. “Institutional Foundations of Economic Ideas in Latin America, 1914–1950.” In Economic Doctrines in Latin America: Origins, Embedding and Evolution, eds. Thorp, Rosemary and Fitzgerald, Valpy, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2005: 142–156.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph L. “Flux and Reflux: Interwar and Postwar Structuralist Theories of Development in Romania and Latin America.” In History and Culture of Economic Nationalism in East-Central Europe, eds. Helga Schultz and Eduard Kubu, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2006: 71–86. “Latin America, UNCTAD, and the Postwar Trading System.” In Economic Development in Latin America: Essays in Honor of Werner Baer, eds. Esfahani, Hadi Salehi, Facchini, Giovanni, and Hewings, Geoffrey, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010: 22–33.Google Scholar
Montecinos, Veronica. “Economists in Political and Policy Elites in Latin America.” In The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics, ed. Coats, A. W. Durham: Duke University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. “UNCTAD: Poor Nations’ Pressure Group.” In The Anatomy of Influence: Decision Making in International Organizations, eds. Cox, Robert W. and Karan, Jacobson Harold, New Haven, Connecticut, 1973: 334.Google Scholar
Ocampo, José Antonio and Parra, María Ángela. “Returning to An Eternal Debate: The Terms of Trade for Commodities in the Twentieth Century.” CEPAL, series Informes y estudios especiales 5, 2003: 1–56.Google Scholar
Packenham, Robert A. The Dependency Movement: Scholarship and Politics in Development Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Pinto, Aníbal. “Naturaleza e implicaciones de la ‘heterogeneidad estructural’ de la América Latina.” El Trimestre Económico 37, 1, 145, 1970: 83–100.Google Scholar
Pinto, Aníbal. América Latina: una visión estructuralista. México, DF: UNAM, 1991 [1974].Google Scholar
Porcile, Gabriel. “La teoría estructuralista del desarrollo.” In El desarrollo inclusivo en América Latina y el Caribe: Ensayos sobre políticas de convergencia productiva para la igualdad, ed. Infante, Ricardo, Santiago: CEPAL, 2011: 31–64.Google Scholar
Prado, Eleuterio F. S. “A ortodoxia neoclássica.” USP: Estudos Avançados 15, 41, January/April 2001.Google Scholar
Prebisch, Raúl. Towards a Dynamic Development Policy for Latin America. New York: United Nations, 1963.Google Scholar
Presidência da República [Celso Furtado, principal author]. Plano trienal de desenvolvimento econômico e social: 1963–1965 (Síntese). Rio: n. pub, December 1962.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Octavio. El Estructuralismo latinoamericano. México, DF: Siglo XXI and CEPAL, 2006.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: Norton, 2013.Google Scholar
Sunkel, Osvaldo and Zuleta, Gustavo. “Neostructuralism vs. Neoliberalism in the 1990s.” CEPAL Review 42: 35–52, 1990.Google Scholar
Szlajfer, Henryk. Economic Nationalism in East-Central Europe and South America (1918–1939). Genève: Librairie Droz, 1990.Google Scholar
Thirion, Gerard. “The Birth of PREALC (1968–1973).” In PREALC: 25 Years. Santiago: International Labour Organization, 1993.Google Scholar
Thorp, Rosemary. Progress, Poverty, and Exclusion: An Economic History of Latin America in the Twentieth Century. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 1998.Google Scholar
Thurber, Clarence E., Boeninger, Edgardo and Graham, Lawrence S., eds. Development Administration in Latin America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
United Nations. Economic Development in Selected Countries: Plans, Programmes and Agencies. Lake Success, NY: UN Department of Economic Affairs, 1947.Google Scholar
Bravo, Pedro Vuskovic. “Distribucion del ingreso y opciones del desarrollo.” In Desarrollo latinoamericano: Ensayos críticos, ed. Serra, José. Mexico, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1974: 51–74.Google Scholar
Wahrlich, Beatriz M. de Souza. Reforma administrativa na era de Vargas. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 1983.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. “State Organization in Latin America since 1930.” In Cambridge History of Latin America, Vol. VI, Part 2, ed. Bethell, Leslie, Cambridge University Press, 1994: 1–96.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G. Trade and Poverty: When the Third World Fell Behind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Woods, Ngaire. The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and their Borrowers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Additional Reading
Ricardo, Bielschowsky. “Cincuenta años del pensamiento de la CEPAL: una reseña.” In Cincuenta años del pensamiento de la CEPAL: textos seleccionados. Vol. I, eds. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe / Naciones Unidas, Santiago: CEPAL and Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1998: 9–61.Google Scholar
Ricardo, Bielschowsky. “Sesenta Años de la CEPAL y el pensamiento reciente.” In Sesenta años de la CEPAL: Textos seleccionados del decenio 1998–2008, ed. Ricardo, Bielschowsky, Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno/CEPAL, 2010: 15–89.Google Scholar
Brown, Jonathan C. “Introduction, From Structuralism to the New Institutional Economics: A Half-Century of Latin American Economic Historiography.” Latin American Research Review 40:3, 2005: 97–99.Google Scholar
Coatsworth, John H. “Structures, Endowments, and Institutions in the Economic History of Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 40, 3, 2005, 126–144.Google Scholar
Kuntz Ficker, Sandra. “From Structuralism to the New Institutional Economics: The Impact of Theory on the Study of Foreign Trade in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 40, 3, 2005: 145–162.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph L. “The Rise and Decline of Economic Structuralism in Latin America: New Dimensions.” Latin American Research Review 40, 3, 2005: 100–125.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph L. “Brazilian Structuralism.” In Amann, Edmund, Carlos, Azzoni, and Bauer, Werner, The Oxford Handbook of the Brazilian Economy. Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by