Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Shakespeare's History plays: 1900-1951
- The Unity of 2 Henry IV
- Anticipation and Foreboding in Shakespeare’s Early Histories
- Middle-Class Attitudes in Shakespeare’s Histories
- A Reconsideration of Edward III
- On Producing Henry VI
- The Huntington Library
- An Early Elizabethan Playhouse
- Shakespeare Learns the Value of Money: The Dramatist at Work on Timon of Athens
- Shakespeare’s French Fruits
- An Elizabethan Eyewitness of Antony and Cleopatra?
- Othello’s “It is the cause . . .”: An Analysis
- On Translating Hamlet
- Shakespeare in China
- International Notes
- Shakespeare Productions in the United Kingdom: 1951
- Shakespeare’s History Plays - Epic or Drama?
- Festival Shakespeare in the West End
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times and Stage
- 3 Textual Studies
- Books Received
- Index
- Plate Section
Othello’s “It is the cause . . .”: An Analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2007
- Frontmatter
- Shakespeare's History plays: 1900-1951
- The Unity of 2 Henry IV
- Anticipation and Foreboding in Shakespeare’s Early Histories
- Middle-Class Attitudes in Shakespeare’s Histories
- A Reconsideration of Edward III
- On Producing Henry VI
- The Huntington Library
- An Early Elizabethan Playhouse
- Shakespeare Learns the Value of Money: The Dramatist at Work on Timon of Athens
- Shakespeare’s French Fruits
- An Elizabethan Eyewitness of Antony and Cleopatra?
- Othello’s “It is the cause . . .”: An Analysis
- On Translating Hamlet
- Shakespeare in China
- International Notes
- Shakespeare Productions in the United Kingdom: 1951
- Shakespeare’s History Plays - Epic or Drama?
- Festival Shakespeare in the West End
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times and Stage
- 3 Textual Studies
- Books Received
- Index
- Plate Section
Summary
It is always dangerous to treat a great Shakespearian speech as an isolated piece of verse, since the greatest speech will be the most deeply rooted in the total context of the play. On the other hand, there are some speeches which are, as it were, focal, gathering up the main themes and concentrating the “extended metaphor” of the whole play. Detailed analysis of such passages, far from constituting a risky ‘academic exercise’, is in fact imperative. And it goes without saying that the speech which I have chosen (Othello’s “It is the cause, it is the cause, my soul”), seems to me eminently suitable for such an analysis; for without analysis at this point there is the danger of a simple, emotional surrender, and, consequently, of a fatal misinterpretation.
I have undertaken this study as an actor, but it would be false to imagine that I am deliberately aiming to represent the 'actor's point of view', or to suggest a method of 'characterization', or to offer any opposed alternative to the academic approach. Instead, I hope to indicate not an opposition, but a fundamental uniformity. Shakespearian actor and Shakespearian critic meet in the study of the words, but the actor's 'characterization' and the critic's analysis are alike valueless, unless they are related to the play in its wholeness. There are two approaches, but there is only one end.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare Survey , pp. 94 - 105Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1953