Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:41:36.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Sarah Boslaugh
Sarah Boslaugh
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Secondary Data Sources for Public Health
A Practical Guide
 , pp. 129 - 136
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, N. 2003. Secondary use of personal data for health and health services research: Why identifiable data are essential. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 8(Suppl 1):36–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulmer, M I A, Sturgis, P J, Allum, N. 2006. The secondary analysis of survey data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ciol, M A, Hoffman, J M, Dudgeon, B J, Shumway-Cook, A, Yorkston, K M, Chan, L. 2006. Understanding the use of weights in the analysis of data from multistage surveys. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 87(2):299–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaus, D. 2002. Social surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Elder, G H, Pavalko, E K, Clipp, E C. 1993. Working with archival data: Studying lives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, J. 2004. Reworking qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, P, Vogel, R, Clarke-Steffen, L. 1997. The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research 7(3):408–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, P, Naylor, C D. 1996. Health services research: Reporting on studies using secondary data. Canadian Medical Association Journal 155(12):1697–1702.Google ScholarPubMed
James, J, Sorensen, A. 2000. Archiving longitudinal data for future research: Why qualitative data add to a study's usefulness. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1(3). Available online at: http://qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm. Accessed July 6, 2006.Google Scholar
Jiang, Y, Alastair, J S, Wild, C J. 2006. Secondary analysis of case-control data. Statistics in Medicine 25:1323–1339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, A J, McMurchy, L, Scott, A J. 1997. Re-using data from case-control studies. Statistics in Medicine 16:1377–1389.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowrance, W W. 2003. Learning from experience: Privacy and the secondary use of data in health research. Journal of Biolaw and Business 6(4):30–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Kiekolt, K J, Nathan, L E. 1985. Secondary analysis of survey data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, J. 2000. Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, C V, Goodman, K J. 2006. Causal criteria and counterfactuals: Nothing more (or less) than scientific common sense. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 3:5. Available online at: http://www.ete-online.com/content/3/1/5. Accessed September 20, 2006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothman, K J, Greenland, S. 1998. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Sieber, J E, ed. 1991. Sharing social science data: Advantages and challenges. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, E, Kamins, M A. 1992. Secondary research: Information sources and methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tomlinson-Keasey C A. 1993. Opportunities and challenges posed by archival data sets. In: Funder, D C, Parke, R D, Tomlinson-Keasey, C A, Widaman, L, eds. Studying lives through time: Personality and development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeager K R, Roberts A R. 2006. Mental illness, substance dependence, and suicidality: Secondary data analysis. In: Roberts, A R, Yeager, K R, eds. Foundations of evidence-based social work practice. New York: Oxford, pp. 314–322.Google Scholar
Bartlett, D L, Ezzati-Rice, T M, Stokley, S, Zhao, Z. 2001. Comparison of NIS and NHIS/NIPRCS vaccination coverage estimates. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 20(4 Suppl):25–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, C J, Neumark, D, Oberst, K, Luo, Z, Brennan, S, Schenk, M. 2005. Combining registry, primary, and secondary data sources to identify the impact of cancer on labor market outcomes. Medical Decision Making 25(5):534–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilchrist, V J, Stange, K C, Flocke, S A, McCord, G, Bourguet, C C. 2004. A comparison of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) measurement approach with direct observation of outpatient visits. Medical Care 42(3):276–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hing, E, Gousen, S, Shimizu, I, Burt, C. 2003. Guide to using masked design variables to estimate standard errors in public use files of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Inquiry 40(4):401–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, Y H, Zack, M. 2005. Computations of confidence intervals for estimates in the United States National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1979–2000. Preventing Chronic Disease 2(3):A06. Epub 2005 Jun 15.Google ScholarPubMed
Merrill, R M, Dearden, K A. 2004. How representative are the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program cancer data of the United States? Cancer Causes & Control 15(10):1027–1034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, P J, Battaglia, M P, Huggins, V J, Hoaglin, D C, Roden, A, Khare, M, Ezzati-Rice, T A, Wright, R A. 2001. Overview of the sampling design and statistical methods used in the National Immunization Survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 20(4 Suppl):17–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steiner, C, Elixhauser, A, Schnaier, J. 2002. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project: An overview. Effective Clinical Practice 5(3):143–151.Google ScholarPubMed
Zell, E R, Ezzati-Rice, T M, Battaglia, M P, Wright, R A. 2000. National Immunization Survey: The methodology of a vaccination surveillance system. Public Health Reports 115(1):65–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andresen, E M, Catlin, T K, Wyrwich, K W, Jackson-Thompson, J. 2003. Retest reliability of surveillance questions on health related quality of life. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 57(5):339–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowlin, S J, Morril, B D, Nafziger, A N, Jenkins, P L, Lewis, C, Pearson, T A. 1993. Validity of cardiovascular disease risk factors assessed by telephone survey: The Behavioral Risk Factor Survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 46(6):561–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brener, N D, Kann, L, Kinchen, S A, Grunbaum, J A, Whalen, L, Eaton, D, Hawkins, J, Ross, J G. 2004. Methodology of the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. MMWR Recommendations and Reports 53(RR-12):1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Gentry, E M, Kalsbeek, W D, Hogelin, G C, Jones, J T, Gaines, K L, Forman, M R, Marks, J S, Trowbridge, F L. 1985. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveys: II. Design, methods, and estimates from combined state data. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1(6):9–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, L D, O'Malley, P M. 1997. The recanting of earlier reported drug use by young adults. NIDA Research Monograph 167:59–80.Google ScholarPubMed
O'Malley, P M, Bachman, J G, Johnston, L D. 1983. Reliability and consistency in self-reports of drug use. International Journal of the Addictions 18(6):805–824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, D E, Holtzman, D, Bolen, J, Stanwyck, C A, Mack, K A. 2001. Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Social and Preventive Medicine 46(Suppl 1):S3–S42.Google Scholar
Remington, P L, Smith, M Y, Williamson, D F, Anda, R F, Gentry, E M, Hogelin, G C. 1988. Design, characteristics, and usefulness of state-based behavioral risk factor surveillance 1981–1987. Public Health Reports 103(4):366–375.Google Scholar
Fronstin, P. 2000. Counting the uninsured: A comparison of national surveys. Employee Benefit Research Institute Issue Brief 225:1–19.Google Scholar
Himes, J H, Faricy, A. 2001. Validity and reliability of self-reported stature and weight of US adolescents. American Journal of Human Biology 13(2):255–260.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, M K, Miller, M E, Anderson, R T, Worley, A S, Longino, C F Jr. 1997. Benefits of linkage to the National Death Index in the Longitudinal Study of Aging. Journal of Aging and Health 9(3):298–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korenman, S, Goldman, N, Fu, H. 1997. Misclassification bias in estimates of bereavement effects. American Journal of Epidemiology 145(11):995–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuczmarski, M F, Kuczmarski, R J, Najjar, M. 2001. Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: Findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 101(1):28–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargas, C M, Burt, V L, Gillum, R F, Pamuk, E R. 1997. Validity of self-reported hypertension in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, 1988–1991. Preventive Medicine 26(5 Pt 1):678–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yabroff, K R, Gordis, L. 2003. Assessment of a national health interview survey-based method of measuring community socioeconomic status. Annals of Epidemiology 13(10):721–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, M. 2001. Validity of birth certificate data for the outcome of the previous pregnancy, Georgia, 1980–1995. American Journal of Epidemiology 154(10):883–888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, L, Marchi, K, Pearl, M, Williams, R, Braveman, P. 2000. The validity of information on “race” and “Hispanic ethnicity” in California birth certificate data. Health Services Research 35(4):869–883.Google Scholar
Campbell, A A, Mosher, W D. 2000. A history of the measurement of unintended pregnancies and births. Maternal and Child Health Journal 4(3):163–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowper, D C, Kubal, J D, Maynard, C, Hynes, D M. 2002. A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases. Annals of Epidemiology 12(7):462–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiGiuseppe, D L, Aron, D C, Ranbom, L, Harper, D L, Rosenthal, G E. 2002. Reliability of birth certificate data: A multi-hospital comparison to medical records information. Maternal and Child Health Journal 6(3):169–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansson, L A, Westerling, R, Rosenberg, H M. 2006. Methodology of studies evaluating death certificate accuracy were flawed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59(2):125–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufmann, R B, Morris, L, Spitz, A M. 1997. Comparison of two question sequences for assessing pregnancy intentions. American Journal of Epidemiology 145(9):810–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klerman, L V. 2000. The intendedness of pregnancy: A concept in transition. Maternal and Child Health Journal 4(3):155–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lydon-Rochelle, M T, Cardenas, V, Nelson, J L, Tomashek, K M, Mueller, B A, Easterling, T R. 2005. Validity of maternal and perinatal risk factors reported on fetal death certificates. American Journal of Public Health 95(11):1948–1951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lydon-Rochelle, M T, Holt, V L, Nelson, J C, Cardenas, V, Gardella, C, Easterling, T R, Callaghan, W M. 2005. Accuracy of reporting maternal in-hospital diagnoses and intrapartum procedures in Washington State linked birth records. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 19(6):460–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, J A, Hoyert, D L. 2002. The national fetal death file. Seminars in Perinatology 26(1):3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mosher, W D. 1998. Design and operation of the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Family Planning Perspectives 30(1):43–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northam, S, Knapp, T R. 2006. The reliability and validity of birth certificates. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 35(1):3–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothwell, C J. 2004. Reengineering vital registration and statistics systems for the United States. Preventing Chronic Disease 1(4):A03. Epub 2004 Sep 15.Google ScholarPubMed
Shulman, H B, Gilbert, B C, Msphbrenda, C G, Lansky, A. 2006. The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates. Public Health Reports 121(1):74–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, G S, Yuan, Z, Stange, K C, Amini, S B, Dennis, L K, Rimm, A A. 1999. The utility of Medicare claims data for measuring cancer stage. Medical Care 37(7):706–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chattopadhyay, A, Bindman, A B. 2005. Accuracy of Medicaid payer coding in hospital patient discharge data: Implications for Medicaid policy evaluation. Medical Care 43(6):586–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doctor, J N, Chan, L, MacLehose, R F, Patrick, D L. 2000. Weighted health status in the Medicare population: Development of the Weighted Health Index for the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (WHIMCBS). Journal of Outcome Measurement 4(4):721–739.Google Scholar
Fisher, E S, Baron, J A, Malenka, D J, Barrett, J, Bubolz, T A. 1990. Overcoming potential pitfalls in the use of Medicare data for epidemiologic research. American Journal of Public Health 80(12):1487–1490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gyllstrom, M E, Jensen, J L, Vaughan, J N, Castellano, S E, Oswald, J W. 2002. Linking birth certificates with Medicaid data to enhance population health assessment: Methodological issues addressed. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 8(4):38–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, E D, Klees, B S, Curtis, C A. 2002. Overview of the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Health Care Financing Review Statistical Supplement1–348.Google ScholarPubMed
Jones, N III, Jones, S L, Miller, N A. 2004. The Medicare Health Outcomes Survey program: Overview, context, and near-term prospects. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2:33. Available online at: http://www.hqlo.com/content/2/1/33. Accessed July 6, 2006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koroukian, S M, Cooper, G S, Alfred, Rimm A A. 2002. Ability of Medicaid claims data to identify incident cases of breast cancer in the Ohio Medicaid population. Health Services Research 38(3):947–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, R O, Wei, I I, Virnig, B A. 2004. Improving identification of Hispanic males in Medicare: Use of surname matching. Medical Care 42(8):810–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saydah, S H, Geiss, L S, Tierney, E, Benjamin, S M, Engelgau, M, Brancati, F. 2004. Review of the performance of methods to identify diabetes cases among vital statistics, administrative, and survey data. Annals of Epidemiology 14(7):507–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, P S, Walker, A, Tsuang, M, Orav, E J, Levin, R, Avorn, J. 2000. Strategies for improving comorbidity measures based on Medicare and Medicaid claims data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53(6):571–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, M, Stump, T E, Callahan, C M, Lewis, J N, McDonald, C J. 2003. A practical method of linking data from Medicare claims and a comprehensive electronic medical records system. International Journal of Medical Informatics 71(1):57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunsch, H, Harrison, D A, Rowan, K. 2005. Health services research in critical care using administrative data. Journal of Critical Care 20(3):264–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhan, C, Miller, M R. 2003. Administrative data based patient safety research: A critical review. Quality and Safety in Health Care 12(Suppl 2):58–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, R E. 1994. Using the 1990 U.S. Census for Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Best, A E. 1999. Secondary data bases and their use in outcomes research: A review of the Area Resource File and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Journal of Medical Systems 23(3):175–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, J. 1991. The NORC General Social Survey: A user's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
A Guide to the Data Resources of the Henry A. Murray Research Center of Radcliffe College, A Center for the Study of Lives. 1996. Cambridge, MA: Radcliffe Institutes for Advanced Study.
Mays, V M, Ponce, N A, Washington, D L, Cochran, S D. 2003. Classification of race and ethnicity: Implications for public health. Annual Review of Public Health 24:83–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heijden, P J M, Puijenbroek, E P, Buuren, S, Hofstede, J W. 2002. On the assessment of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting systems: The influence of under-reporting on odds ratios. Statistics in Medicine 21:2027–2044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, C H, Savola, K L, Phelps, E. 1991. Inventory of longitudinal studies in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Sarah Boslaugh, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Secondary Data Sources for Public Health
  • Online publication: 03 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618802.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Sarah Boslaugh, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Secondary Data Sources for Public Health
  • Online publication: 03 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618802.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Sarah Boslaugh, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Secondary Data Sources for Public Health
  • Online publication: 03 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618802.012
Available formats
×