Book contents
- Schopenhauer’s The World as Will and Representation
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Schopenhauer’s The World as Will and Representation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Texts, Translations, and Abbreviations
- Introduction: Schopenhauer in the Time of Pandemic
- Chapter 1 Different Kinds of Willing in Schopenhauer
- Chapter 2 Resignation
- Chapter 3 Appreciating Nature Aesthetically in The World as Will and Representation: Between Kant and Hegel
- Chapter 4 The Hour of Consecration: Inspiration and Cognition in Schopenhauer’s Genius
- Chapter 5 Experiencing Character as a Key for a Present-Day Interpretation of Schopenhauer
- Chapter 6 Schopenhauer in Dialogue with Fichte and Schelling: Schopenhauer’s Critique of Moral Fatalism and His Turn to Freedom from Willing
- Chapter 7 Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Religion: (Hopeless) Romanticism?
- Chapter 8 Maja and Nieban in The World as Will and Representation
- Chapter 9 Schopenhauer, Universal Guilt, and Asceticism as the Expression of Universal Compassion
- Chapter 10 Seeing Things: Schopenhauer’s Kant Critique and Direct Realism
- Chapter 11 The Sciences in The World as Will and Representation
- Chapter 12 Pushing Back: Reading The World as Will and Representation as a Woman
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 December 2022
Book contents
- Schopenhauer’s The World as Will and Representation
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Schopenhauer’s The World as Will and Representation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Texts, Translations, and Abbreviations
- Introduction: Schopenhauer in the Time of Pandemic
- Chapter 1 Different Kinds of Willing in Schopenhauer
- Chapter 2 Resignation
- Chapter 3 Appreciating Nature Aesthetically in The World as Will and Representation: Between Kant and Hegel
- Chapter 4 The Hour of Consecration: Inspiration and Cognition in Schopenhauer’s Genius
- Chapter 5 Experiencing Character as a Key for a Present-Day Interpretation of Schopenhauer
- Chapter 6 Schopenhauer in Dialogue with Fichte and Schelling: Schopenhauer’s Critique of Moral Fatalism and His Turn to Freedom from Willing
- Chapter 7 Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Religion: (Hopeless) Romanticism?
- Chapter 8 Maja and Nieban in The World as Will and Representation
- Chapter 9 Schopenhauer, Universal Guilt, and Asceticism as the Expression of Universal Compassion
- Chapter 10 Seeing Things: Schopenhauer’s Kant Critique and Direct Realism
- Chapter 11 The Sciences in The World as Will and Representation
- Chapter 12 Pushing Back: Reading The World as Will and Representation as a Woman
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Schopenhauer's 'The World as Will and Representation'A Critical Guide, pp. 264 - 276Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Abaci, Uygar. “Artistic Sublime Revisited: Reply to Robert Clewis.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68, no. 2 (2010): 170–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abaci, Uygar. “Kant’s Justified Dismissal of Artistic Sublimity.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66, no. 3 (2008): 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
App, Urs. “Required Reading: Schopenhauer’s Favourite Book.” Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 93 (2012): 65–85.Google Scholar
App, Urs. Schopenhauers Kompass. Rorschach, Switzerland/Kyoto: University Media, 2011.Google Scholar
App, Urs. “Schopenhauer’s Initial Encounter with Indian Thought.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 87 (2006): 35–76.Google Scholar
App, Urs. “Notes and Excerpts by Schopenhauer Related to Volumes 1–9 of the Asiatick Researches.” Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 79 (1998): 11–33.Google Scholar
Aquila, Richard. Matter in Mind: A Study of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Atlas, L. Y. , Whittington, R. A., Lindquis, M. A., et al. “Dissociable Influences of Opiates and Expectations on Pain.” The Journal of Neuroscience 32, no. 23 (2012): 8053–64.Google Scholar
Atwell, John E. “Schopenhauer on Women, Men, and Sexual Love.” Midwest Quarterly 38, no. 2 (1997): 143–57.Google Scholar
Atwell, John E. Schopenhauer on the Character of the World: The Metaphysics of Will. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atzert, Stephan. “Schopenhauer und seine Quellen: Zum Buddhismusbild in den frühen Asiatick Researches.” Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 88 (2007): 15–27.Google Scholar
Atzert, Stephan. “Philipp Mainländer zwischen Schopenhauers Nirvana und Freuds Todestrieb.” In Mainländer Global: Offenbacher Mainländer-Symposium 2016, vol. 4, edited by Müller-Seyfarth, Winfried H. and Regehly, Thomas, 31–47. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2017.Google Scholar
Atzert, Stephan. “Zu Eduard von Hartmanns Buddhismusbild.” In Internationale Mainländer Studien, vol. 5, edited by Müller, Winfried and Smiljanic, Damir, 77–91. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2020.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. Weltschmerz. Pessimism in German Philosophy 1860–1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Robert Jan. Objektiver Idealismus und Voluntarismus in der Metaphysik Schellings und Schopenhauers. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2003.Google Scholar
Berger, Douglas. The Veil of Māyā: Schopenhauer’s System and Early Indian Thought. Binghamton, NY: Global Academic Publications, 2004.Google Scholar
Bhikkhu, Thanissaro. “Nibbana,” Access to Insight (BCBS Edition), March 8, 2011, www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/nibbana.html, accessed February 26, 2020.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. Translated by Elizabeth Guild. New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Brickman, P., Coates, D., and Janoff-Bulman, R. “Lottery Winners and Accident Victims: Is Happiness Relative?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, no. 8 (1978): 917–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brilmyer, Pearl. “Schopenhauer and British Literary Feminism.” In The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook, edited by Shapshay, Sandra, 397–424. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Francis. “On the Religion and Literature of the Burmas.” Asiatick Researches 6 (1799): 163–308.Google Scholar
Cacciola, Maria Lúcia. “Immanenter Dogmatismus.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 93 (2012): 151–61.Google Scholar
Cartwright, David. “Schopenhauer and the Value of Compassion.” In A Companion to Schopenhauer, edited by Vandenabeele, Bart, 249–65. Oxford: Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Cartwright, David. Schopenhauer. A Biography. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, David. “Compassion and Solidarity with Sufferers: The Metaphysics of Mitleid.” European Journal of Philosophy 16, no. 2 (2008): 292–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassina, Ubaldo. Saggio Analitico su la Compassione. Parma, 1772. 2nd edition 1788. Translated by Carl Friedrich Pockels as Analytischer Versuch über das Mitleiden. Hanover: Christian Ritscher, 1790.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert. “A Case for Kantian Artistic Sublimity: A Response to Abaci.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68, no. 2 (2010): 167–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, W. S. “Schopenhauer and Murdoch on the Ethical Value of the Loss of Self in Aesthetic Experience.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 51, no. 4 (2017): 5–25.Google Scholar
Collins, Steven. Nirvana and Other Buddhist felicities. Utopias of the Pali imaginaire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, David E. “Schopenhauer and Indian Philosophy.” In A Companion to Schopenhauer, edited by Vandenabeele, Bart, 266–79. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Crane, Tim and French, Craig. “The Problem of Perception.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/perception-problem.Google Scholar
Creuzer, G. F. Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker, besonders der Griechen, 6 vols. New York: Arno Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Cross, Stephen. Schopenhauer’s Encounter with Indian Thought. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Damon, William. Bringing in a New Era in Character Education. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dauer, Dorothea. Schopenhauer as Transmitter of Buddhist Ideas. Bern: Herbert Lang, 1969.Google Scholar
De Cian, Nicoletta. Redenzione, colpa, salvezza. All’origine della filosofia di Schopenhauer. Trento: Verifiche, 2002.Google Scholar
De Cian, Nicoletta and Segala, Marco. “What Is Will?” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 83 (2002): 13–42.Google Scholar
Diffey, T. J. “Schopenhauer’s Account of Aesthetic Experience.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 30, no. 2 (1990): 132–42.Google Scholar
Diprose, Rosalyn. The Bodies of Women: Ethics, Embodiment and Sexual Difference. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Dupré, Louis. The Quest of the Absolute. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Estermann, Alfred. Arthur Schopenhauer. Szenen aus der Umgebung der Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Insel, 2000.Google Scholar
Fernández, Jordi. “Schopenhauer’s Pessimism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73, no. 3 (2006): 646–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. The System of Ethics. Translated by Daniel Breazeale and Günter Zöller. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. “Review of Leonhard Creuzer,” translated by Daniel Breazeale, The Philosophical Forum 32, no. 4 (2001): 289–96.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 42 vols., edited by Lauth, Reinhard, Jacobs, Hans, Gliwitzky, Hans, and Fuchs, Erich. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzaboog, 1964–2012.Google Scholar
Foster, Cheryl. “Schopenhauer’s Subtext on Natural Beauty.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 32, no. 1 (1992): 21–32.Google Scholar
Franks, Paul. All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. “Schopenhauer’s Contraction of Reason: Clarifying Kant and Undoing German Idealism.” The Kantian Review 17, no. 3 (2012): 375–401.Google Scholar
Garfield, Jay L. Engaging Buddhism: Why It Matters to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genone, James. “Recent Work on Naive Realism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 53, no. 1 (2016): 1–25.Google Scholar
Gestering, Johann. “Schopenhauer und Indien.” In Ethik und Vernunft. Schopenhauer in unserer Zeit, edited by Schirmacher, Wolfgang, 53–60. Vienna: Passagen Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
Grimwood, Thomas. “The Limits of Misogyny: Schopenhauer, ‘On Women’.” Kritike 2, no. 2 (2008): 131–45.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Monism and Pluralism in the History of Aesthetics.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71, no. 2 (2013): 133–43.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Back to Truth: Knowledge and Pleasure in the Aesthetics of Schopenhauer.” European Journal of Philosophy 16, no. 2 (2008): 164–78.Google Scholar
Hannan, Barbara. The Riddle of the World: A Reconsideration of Schopenhauer’s Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Paul. An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hauer, Catherine. “Misogynistic Grammatical Structures in Schopenhauer’s The World as Will and Representation and Their Implications.” Unpublished manuscript, 2017.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Introductory Lectures on Aesthetics. Translated by Bernard Bosanquet. London: Penguin Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. New York: State University of New York Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2006 [1927]. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson as Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell, 1962.Google Scholar
Heilbron, John. “Scientist.” In The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science, edited by Heilbron, John, 744–5. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Herbart, Johann Friedrich. “Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung: vier Bücher, nebst einem Anhange, der die Kritik der kantischen Philosophie enthält, von Arthur Schopenhauer” [signed E. G. Z.]. Hermes oder kritisches Jahrbuch der Literatur 3 (1820): 131–49.Google Scholar
Hühn, Lore, ed. Die Ethik Arthur Schopenhauers im Ausgang vom Deutschen Idealismus (Fichte/Schelling). Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 2006.Google Scholar
Hühn, Lore. “Der Wille, der Nichts Will: Zum Paradox negativer Freiheit bei Schelling und Schopenhauer.” In Die Ethik Arthur Schopenhauers im Ausgang vom Deutschen Idealismus (Fichte/Schelling), edited by Hühn, Lore, 149–60. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 2006.Google Scholar
Hühn, Lore. “Die Wiederkehr des Verdrängten. Überlegungen zur Rolle des Anfangs bei Schelling und Schopenhauer.” Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 86 (2005): 55–69.Google Scholar
Hühn, Lore. “Die intelligible Tat. Zu einer Gemeinsamkeit Schillings und Schopenhauers.” In Selbstbesinnung der philosophischen Moderne: Beiträge zur kritischen Hermeneutik ihrer Grundbegriffe, edited by Iber, Christian and Pocai, Romano, 55–94. Cuxhaven, Germany and Dartford, UK: Junghans, 1998.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Logical Investigations. Translated by J. M. Findlay. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970 [1900].Google Scholar
Jacquette, Dale, ed. Schopenhauer, Philosophy, and the Arts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. “Schopenhauer on the Aimlessness of the Will.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26, no. 2 (2018): 331–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. “Schopenhauer’s Christian Perspectives.” In The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook, edited by Shapshay, Sandra, 351–72. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher “What’s So Good about Negation of the Will? Schopenhauer and the Problem of the Summum Bonum.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 54, no. 4 (2016), 649–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janaway, Christopher, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. “Schopenhauer’s Pessimism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer, edited by Janaway, Christopher, 318–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. “Will and Nature.” In The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer, edited by Janaway, Christopher, 138–70. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. “Knowledge and Tranquility: Schopenhauer on the Value of Art.” In Schopenhauer, Philosophy, and the Arts, edited by Jacquette, Dale, 39–61. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. Self and World in Schopenhauer’s Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. Mankind, Nation, and Individual. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2007 [1946].Google Scholar
Kahane, Guy. “Pain, Experience, and Well-Being.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being, edited by Fletcher, G., 209–20. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [1795].Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [1782; 2nd edition 1787].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Metaphysics. Translated by Karl Ameriks and Steve Naragon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kisner, Manja. “Fichte’s Moral Psychology of Drives and Feelings and Its Influence on Schopenhauer’s Metaphysics of the Will,” International Yearbook of German Idealism 15 (2020): 110–13.Google Scholar
Kisner, Manja. Der Wille und das Ding an sich: Schopenhauers Willensmetaphysik in ihrem Bezug zu Kants kritischer Philosophie und dem nachkantischen Idealismus. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar
Klages, Ludwig. Die Grundlagen der Charakterkunde, 14th edition. Bonn: Bouvier, 1969 [Leipzig, 1928].Google Scholar
Koßler, Matthias. “Die Welt als inintelligibler und empirischer Charakter.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 97 (2016): 93–103.Google Scholar
Koßler, Matthias. “Charakter als praxistheoretischer Begriff.” In Praxis denken. Konzepte und Kritik, edited by Alkemeyer, T., Schürmann, Volker, and Volbers, Jörg, 151–68. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Koßler, Matthias. “The Artist as Subject of Pure Cognition.” In A Companion to Schopenhauer, edited by Vandenabeele, Bart, 193–205. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.Google Scholar
Koßler, Matthias. “The ‘Perfected System of Criticism’: Schopenhauer’s Initial Disagreements with Kant.” Kantian Review 17, no. 3 (2012): 459–78.Google Scholar
Koßler, Matthias. “Life Is but a Mirror: On the Connection between Ethics, Metaphysics and Character in Schopenhauer.” European Journal of Philosophy 16, no. 2 (2008): 230–50.Google Scholar
Koßler, Matthias. Empirische Ethik und christliche Moral. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1999.Google Scholar
Koßler, Matthias. “Empirischer und intelligibler Charakter: von Kant über Fries und Schelling zu Schopenhauer.” Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 76 (1995): 195–201.Google Scholar
Kosch, Michelle. Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Krukowski, Lucian. “Schopenhauer and the Aesthetics of Creativity.” In Schopenhauer, Philosophy and the Arts, edited by Jacquette, Dale, 62–80. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurbel, Martina. Jenseits des Satzes vom Grund: Schopenhauers Lehre von der Wesenserkenntnis im Kontext seiner, Oupnek’hat’-Rezeption. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2015.Google Scholar
Ladyman, James and Ross, Don. Every Thing Must Go. Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “De Synthesi et Analysi universali seu Arte inveniendi et judicandi.” In Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Vol. VII, edited by Gerhardt, C. I., 292–8. Hildesheim: Olms, 2007.Google Scholar
Lemanski, Jens and Schubbe, Daniel. “Konzeptionelle Probleme und Interpretationsansätze der Welt als Wille und Vorstellung.” In Schopenhauer-Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung, 2nd edition, edited by Schubbe, Daniel and Koßler, Matthias, 43–51. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2018.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur. The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur. “Schopenhauer as an Evolutionist.” The Monist 21, no. 2 (1911): 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lütkehaus, Ludger. Nichts. Abschied vom Sein, Ende der Angst. Zürich: Haffmans bei Zweitausendeins, 2003.Google Scholar
Malter, Rudolf. Arthur Schopenhauer. Transzendentalphilosophie und Metaphysik des Willens. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1991.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Maurice. “The Physiological Orientation of Schopenhauer’s Epistemology.” In Schopenhauer: His Philosophical Achievement, edited by Fox, Michael, 50–67. Hassocks, UK: The Harvester Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Mann, Wolfgang-Rainer. “How Platonic Are Schopenhauer’s Platonic Ideas?” In The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook, edited by Shapshay, Sandra, 43–64. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.Google Scholar
Martin, Wayne. “Fichte’s Creuzer Review and the Transformation of the Free Will Problem.” European Journal of Philosophy 26, no. 2 (2018): 717–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Bruce. “Notes on the Concept of the Will in Early Buddhism.” Sri Lanka Journal of the Humanities 1 (1975): 152–60.Google Scholar
May, Eduard. “Schopenhauers Lehre von der Selbstentzweiung des Willens.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 33 (1949–50): 1–9.Google Scholar
McCaughey, Douglas. “Was Kant Anti-Semitic? With an Addendum on Duty.” Creative Commons Licensure, Willamette University, 2020.Google Scholar
Migotti, Mark. “Schopenhauer’s Pessimism and the Unconditioned Good.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33, no. 4 (1995): 643–60.Google Scholar
Moawad, Heidi. “Are the Brains of Geniuses Different?” Neurology Live (July 15, 2016).Google Scholar
Morrell, Jack B. “Professionalisation.” In Companion to the History of Modern Science, edited by Olby, R. C., Cantor, G. N., Christie, J. R. R., and Hodge, M. J. S., 980–9. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen and Tugby, Matthew, eds. Metaphysics and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Neeley, G. Steven. “The Consistency of Schopenhauer’s Metaphysics.” In A Companion to Schopenhauer, edited by Vandenabeele, Bart, 105–19. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Neill, Alex. “Schopenhauer on Tragedy and the Sublime.” In A Companion to Schopenhauer, edited by Vandenabeele, Bart, 206–18. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Neill, Alex. “Aesthetic Experience in Schopenhauer’s Metaphysics of Will.” European Journal of Philosophy 16, no. 2 (2008): 179–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, Moira. “The Influences of Eastern Thought on Schopenhauer’s Doctrine of the Thing-in-Itself.” In The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer, edited by Janaway, Christopher, 171–212. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols: And Other Writings. Translated by Judith Norman. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil. Translated by Judith Norman. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Gay Science. Translated by Josefine Nauckhoff and edited by Willams, Bernard. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Untimely Meditations. Translated by R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Genealogy of Morals. Edited and translated by Kaufmann, Walter and Hollingdale, R. J.. New York: Random House, 1967.Google Scholar
Norman, Judith. “Music and Pessimism.” In The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook, edited by Shapshay, Sandra, 197–212. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.Google Scholar
Norman, Judith and Welchman, Alistair. “Schopenhauer’s Understanding of Schelling.” In The Oxford Handbook of Schopenhauer, edited by Wicks, Robert, 49–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Norman, K. R. Pali Literature Including the Canonical Literature in Prakrit and Sanskrit of All Hinayana Schools of Buddhism. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1983.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, Angelica. “Metamorphosen der Freiheit in der Jenenser Kant-Rezeption (1785–1794).” In Evolution des Geistes: Jena um 1800, edited by Strack, Friedrich, 484–518. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1994.Google Scholar
Pia Jauch, Ursala. “Schopenhauer or Kant: Gender Difference between Critique and Spirit of the Age,” translated by James Dodd. In Continental Philosophy in Feminist Perspective: Re-reading the Canon in German, edited by Nagl-Docekal, Herta and Klinger, Cornelia, 101–12. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Piantelli, Mario, “La Māyā nelle upanisad di Schopenhauer,” Annuario Filosofico 2 (1986): 163–207.Google Scholar
Pillow, Kirk. Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Piper, Reinhard “Die Zeitgenössischen Rezensionen der Werke Arthur Schopenhauers. Zweiter Teil: 1819–1825.” Jahrbuch der Schopenhauers Gesellschaft 6 (1917): 47–168.Google Scholar
Plümacher, Olga. Der Pessimismus in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart: Geschichtliches und Kritisches. Heidelberg: Georg Weiss, 1884 [2nd edition 1888].Google Scholar
Reginster, Bernard. The Affirmation of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhys Davids, Caroline A. F. “On the Will in Buddhism.” The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1898): 47–59.Google Scholar
Rooney, Phyllis. “Recent Work in Feminist Discussions of Reason.” American Philosophical Quarterly 31, no. 1 (1994): 1–21.Google Scholar
Ruta, Marcello. Schopenhauer et Schelling, philosophes du temps et de l’éternité. La deuxième voie du post-kantisme. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2014.Google Scholar
Ryan, Christopher. “Schopenhauer and Gotama on Life’s Suffering. In The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook, edited by Shapshay, Sandra, 373–94. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
Ryan, Christopher. Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Religion. Leuven: Peeters Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar
Safranski, Rüdiger. Schopenhauer and the Wild Years of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. W., Knorr Cetina, K., and von Savigny, E., eds. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London/New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Scheer, Brigitte. “Ästhetik.” In Schopenhauer-Handbuch, 2nd edition, edited by Schubbe, Daniel and Koßler, Matthias, 68–80. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. The Nature of Sympathy, 5th edition. Translated by Peter Heath. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970 [1st edition 1913].Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. Historical-Critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Mythology. Translated by Mason Richey and Markus Zisselsberger. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom. Translated by Jeff Love and Johannes Schmidt. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. On the History of Modern Philosophy. Translated by Andrew Bowie. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. Sämmtliche Werke, edited by Schelling, K. F. A.. Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta, 1856–61.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Benno. “Zu Schopenahuers Hirnparadoxon.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 59 (1978): 184–5.Google Scholar
Schmicking, Daniel A. “Schopenhauer on Unconscious Intelligence and Embodied Cognition.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 24, no. 1 (2007): 89–108.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Alfred. “Wesen, Ort und Funktion der Kunst in der Philosophie Schopenhauers.” In Schopenhauer und die Künste, edited by Baum, Günther and Birnbacher, Dieter. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar
Schöndorf, Harald. Der Leib im Denken Schopenhauers und Fichtes. Munich: Johannes Berchmans Verlag, 1982.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Cogitata. Philosophische Notizen aus dem Nachlass, edited by Ziegler, Ernst, Brumloop, Anke, Müller, Clemens, and Wagner, Manfred. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2017.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Vorlesung über die gesamte Philosophie. Viertes Teil: Metaphysik der Sitten, edited by Schubbe, Daniel, Schmidt, Werntgen, and Elon, Daniel. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2017.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Spicilegia: Philosophische Notizen aus dem Nachlass, edited by Ziegler, Ernst. Munich: Beck, 2015.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. “On Will in Nature.” In On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason and Other Writings. Translated by David E. Cartwright, Edward E. Erdmann, and Christopher Janaway. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Presentation, Vol. II. Translated by Richard Aquila and David Carus. Boston, MA: Prentice, 2011.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics. Translated and edited by Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation, Vol. I. Translated by E. F. J. Payne. New York: Dover Publications, 1969.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. “Philosophische Vorlesungen II.” In Sämtliche Werke 10 edited by Mockrauer, Franz. Munich: Piper, 1913.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Schopenhauers Sämtliche Werke, edited by Deussen, Paul. Munuch: Piper Verlag, 1911–41.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Severin. “Schopenhauer’s Influence on Wittgenstein.” In A Companion to Schopenhauer, edited by Vandenabeele, Bart, 367–84. Oxford: Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Schwab, Raymond. The Oriental Renaissance: Europe’s Rediscovery of India and the East, 1680–1880. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984 [originally published 1950].Google Scholar
Segala, Marco. “Metaphysics and the Sciences in Schopenhauer.” In The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook, edited by Shapshay, Sandra, 151–75. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
Segala, Marco. “Schopenhauer and the Empirical Confirmations of Philosophy.” Idealistic Studies 40, nos. 1–2 (2010): 27–41.Google Scholar
Segala, Marco. Schopenhauer, la filosofia, le scienze. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 2009.Google Scholar
Segala, Marco. “Schopenhauer è antischellinghiano?” Rivista di Filosofia XCII (2001): 235–65.Google Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra. “Was Schopenhauer a Kantian Ethicist?” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 28, no. 2 (2020): 168–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra. Reconstructing Schopenhauer’s Ethics: Hope, Compassion, and Animal Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra, ed. The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra. “Schopenhauer’s Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art.” Philosophy Compass 7, no. 1 (2012): 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra. “Schopenhauer’s Transformation of the Kantian Sublime.” Kantian Review 17, no. 3 (2012): 479–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra. “Poetic Intuition and the Bounds of Sense: Metaphor and Metonymy in Schopenhauer’s Philosophy.” European Journal of Philosophy 16, no. 2 (2008): 211–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra and Ferrell, Tristran. “Compassion or Renunciation? That Is the Question of Schopenhauer’s Ethics.” Enrahonar. Quaderns de Filosofia 55 (2015): 51–69.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. Translated by H. Loiskandl, D. Weinstein, and M. Weinstein. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. Schopenhauer und Nietzsche: ein Vortragszyklus. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1907.Google Scholar
Singh, Raj R. “Suffering and Nirvāṇa in Schopenhauer’s Trans-Cultural Philosophy.” In Schopenhauer and Indian Philosophy: A Dialogue between India and Germany, edited by Barua, Arati, 203–15. New Delhi: Northern Book Centre, 2008.Google Scholar
Singh, Raj. Death, Contemplation and Schopenhauer. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Soll, Ivan. “Schopenhauer on the Inevitability of Unhappiness.” In A Companion to Schopenhauer, edited by Vandenabeele, Bart, 300–13. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon. “Hegel, Creuzer, and the Rise of Orientalism.” The Owl of Minerva 45, no. 4 (2013): 13–34.Google Scholar
Stichweh, Rudolf. Zur Entstehung des modernen Systems wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen. Physik in Deutschland, 1740–1890. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1984.Google Scholar
The Pali Text Society’s Pali-English Dictionary, https://dsal.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/pali/, accessed June 4, 2021.Google Scholar
Tostensen, David. “Husserl’s Direct Perception.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 41, no. 1 (2010): 94–109.Google Scholar
Turner, Steven R. “The Growth of Professorial Research in Prussia, 1818 to 1848 – Causes and Context.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3 (1971): 137–82.Google Scholar
Vanden Auweele, Dennis. “Schopenhauer and the Later Schelling in Dialogue on Mythology.” The Journal of Religion 97, no.4 (2017): 451–74.Google Scholar
Vanden Auweele, Dennis. The Kantian Foundation of Schopenhauer’s Pessimism. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Vanden Auweele, Dennis. “Schopenhauer on Religious Pessimism.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (2015): 53–71.Google Scholar
Vandenabeele, Bart, ed. A Companion to Schopenhauer. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenabeele, Bart. “Schopenhauer and the Objectivity of Art.” In A Companion to Schopenhauer, edited by Vandenabeele, Bart, 219–34. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Vandenabeele, Bart. “Schopenhauer on the Value of Aesthetic Experience.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 45, no. 4 (2007): 565–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varner, G. “The Schopenhauer Challenge in Environmental Ethics.” Environmental Ethics 7 (1985): 209–29.Google Scholar
Vasalou, Sophia. Schopenhauer and the Aesthetic Standpoint: Philosophy as a Practice of the Sublime. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Velasquez-Manoff, Moises. “How Covid Sends Some Bodies to War with Themselves” New York Times Magazine (August 11, 2020).Google Scholar
Wallwitz, Georg. “Fichte und das Problem des intelligiblen Fatalismus.” Fichte-Studien 15 (1999): 121–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, John. Lectures on Dutch Painting, Yale University Art Gallery’s online series at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3kRIdCWVWs.Google Scholar
Weiner, David Avraham. Genius and Talent: Schopenhauer’s Influence on Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses, 1992.Google Scholar
Welchman, Alistair. “Evil in Schelling and Schopenhauer.” In The History of Evil in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, Vol. IV, edited by Hedley, Douglas, Meister, Chad, and Taliaferro, Charles, 150–66. London: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Welchman, Alistair. “Schopenhauer and Compassion,” North American Schopenhauer Society Meeting, American Philosophical Society, Central Division Meeting, Chicago, February 2016.Google Scholar
Welchman, Alistair. “Schelling’s Moral Argument for a Metaphysics of Contingency.” In Nature and Realism in Schelling’s Philosophy, edited by Corriero, Emilio Carlo and Dezi, Andrea, 27–54. Turin: Accademia University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, Edith. The Letters of Edith Wharton, edited by Lewis, R. W. B. and Lewis., N. London: Simon & Schuster, 1988.Google Scholar
White, Robert W. “Motivation Reconsidered: The Concept of Competence.” Psychological Review 66, no. 5 (1959): 297–333.Google Scholar
Wicks, Robert. “Schopenhauer and Judaism.” In The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook, edited by Shapshay, Sandra, 325–50. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
Wicks, Robert. “Natural Beauty and Optimism in Schopenhauer’s Aesthetics.” European Journal of Philosophy 16, no. 2 (2008): 273–91.Google Scholar
Wicks, Robert. “Arthur Schopenhauer.” In Nineteenth-Century Philosophy of Religion, edited by Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, N. N., 82–91. Durham, UK: Acumen Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar
Wicks, Robert. “Kant on Fine Art: Artistic Sublimity Shaped by Beauty.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53, no. 2 (1995): 189–93.Google Scholar
Williams, Paul, Tribe, Anthony, and Wynne, Alexander. Buddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Williamson, George. The Longing for Myth in Germany. Religion and Aesthetic Culture from Romanticism to Nietzsche. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Young, Julian. “Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Death and Salvation.” European Journal of Philosophy 16, no. 2 (2008): 311–24.Google Scholar
Young, Julian. Willing and Unwilling: A Study in the Philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987.Google Scholar
Zachhuber, Johannes. Theology as Science in Nineteenth-Century Germany: From F.C. Baur to Ernst Troeltsch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Zammito, John H. The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Zeller, Eduard. Geschichte der deutschen Philosophie seit Leibniz. Munich: Oldenburg, 1873.Google Scholar
Zöller, Günter. “Anerkennung. Der außerindische Ursprung von Schopenhauers unindischer Auffassung des ‘tat twam asi’.” Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 93 (2012): 87–100.Google Scholar