Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:18:07.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2022

Stefano Bartolini
Stefano Bartolini
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Rule-Making Rules
An Analytical Framework for Political Institutions
 , pp. 273 - 296
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbo, S. et al. (2006), ‘The ripples of “The Big (Agricultural) Bang”: the spread of the early wheat cultivation’, Genome, 49: 861–3.Google Scholar
Agranolf, R. M. and McGuire, M. (2001), ‘American federalism and the search for models of management’, Public Administration Review, 61: 671–81.Google Scholar
Albert, R. (2015), ‘How unwritten constitutional norms change written constitutions’, Dublin University Law Journal, 38: 387–418.Google Scholar
Alexander, D. R. (1974), ‘The evolution of social behavior’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5: 325–83.Google Scholar
Alexy, R. (2002), A Theory of Constitutional Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alford, J. R. and Hibbing, J. R. (2004) ‘The origin of politics: an evolutionary theory of political behavior’, Perspectives on Politics, 2: 707–23.Google Scholar
Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L. and Hibbing, J. R. (2005), ‘Are political orientations genetically transmitted?’, American Political Science Review, 99: 153–67.Google Scholar
Altman, D. (2008), ‘Collegiate executives and direct democracy in Switzerland and Uruguay: similar institutions, opposite political goals, distinct results’, Swiss Political Science Review, 14: 483–520.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. N. and Anderson, P. R. (1967), Political Institutions and Social Change in Continental Europe in the Nineteenth Century, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. (1996), ‘Towards a comparative institutional analysis: motivations and some tentative theorizing’, The Japanese Economic Review, 47: 1–19.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. (2000), ‘Institutional evolution as punctuated equilibria’, in Ménard, C. (ed.), Institutions, Contracts and Organizations, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 11–33.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. (2001), Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Apahideanu, I. (2014), ‘Unicameralism versus bicameralism revisited: the case of Romania’, Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review, 14: 47–88.Google Scholar
Aranda Jimenez, G., Monton-Subias, S. and Sanchez Romero, M. (eds.) (2011), Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner: Feasting Rituals in Prehistoric Societies of Europe and the Near East, Oxford, Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Ardrey, R. (1976), The Hunting Hypothesis, London, William Collins Sons & Co.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1951), Social Choice and Individual Values, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Atenza, M. and Ruitz-Manero, J. (1993), ‘Tre approcci ai principi di diritto’, in Analisi e diritto, Torino, Giappichelli, pp. 13–16.Google Scholar
Aureli, F. et al. (2008), ‘Fission‐fusion dynamic’, Current Anthropology, 49: 627–54.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bagehot, W. (1963 (1872)), The English Constitution, Glasgow, Collins.Google Scholar
Bahro, H., Bayerlein, B. and Veser, E. (1998), ‘Duverger’s concept: semi-presidential government revisited’, European Journal of Political Research, 34: 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar, Y. O. (2002), ‘The Natufian culture and the early Neolithic: social and economic trends in Southwest Asia’, in Bellwood, P. and Renfrew, C. (eds.), Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis, Cambridge, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 113–26.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S. (1988), ‘Principio di maggioranza, regola di maggioranza e decisione di maggioranza’, introduction to Favre, P., La Decisione di Maggioranza, Milan, Giuffré, pp. 2–27.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S. (1999–2000), ‘Collusion, competition and democracy’, part I, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11: 435–70; part II, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12: 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, S. (2000), The Electoral Mobilisation of the European Left: The Class Cleavage 1880–1980, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S. (2018), The Political, Colchester, ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Battegazzorre, F. (2012), Saggi sopra la teoria delle istituzioni politiche, Genoa, Coedit.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. T. (1980), ‘Collegial leadership in advanced industrial societies: the relevance of the Swiss experience’, Polity, 13: 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedock, C. (2017), Reforming Democracy: Institutional Engineering in Western Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1967), The Social Construction of Reality, New York, Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. and Renfrew, C. (eds.) (2002), Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis, Cambridge, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. (1973), State and Society, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berger, J. and Zelditch, M. Jr (eds.) (2000), New Directions in Sociological Theory: The Growth of Contemporary Theories, Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bingham Powell, G. (1989), ‘Constitutional design and citizen electoral control’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1: 107–30.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, P. (1988), State and Collective Action: The European Experience, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, D. (1958), The Theory of Committees and Elections, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. (ed.) (1975), Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. and Scott, R. W. (1962), Formal Organizations, San Francisco, CA, Chandler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blockmans, W. P. (1978), ‘A typology of representative institutions in late medieval Europe’, Journal of Medieval History, 4: 189–215.Google Scholar
Blondel, J. (2006), ‘About institutions, mainly, but not exclusively, political’, in Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S. A. and Rockman, B. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 716–30.Google Scholar
Blossfled, H.-P. (1996), ‘Macro-sociology, rational choice theory and time: a theoretical perspective on the empirical analysis of social processes’, European Sociological Review, 12: 181–206.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1981), ‘La regola di maggioranza: limiti e aporie’, in Bobbio, N., Offe, C. and Lombardini, S. (eds.), Democrazia, maggioranza e minoranze, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 33–72.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N., Offe, C. and Lombardini, S. (eds.) (1981), Democrazia, maggioranza e minoranze, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Börzel, T. A. and Risse, T. (2015), ‘Dysfunctional institutions, social trust, and governance in areas of limited statehood’, Berlin, SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No. 67, Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 700.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. (2007), ‘Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework’, European Law Journal, 13: 447–68.Google Scholar
Braun, D. (2004), ‘Intergovernmental relationships and fiscal policymaking in federal countries’, in Imbeau, L. M. and Petry, F. (eds.), Politics, Institutions, and Fiscal Policy: Deficits and Surpluses in Federated States, London, Lexington Books, pp. 21–48.Google Scholar
Brunner, O. (1984 (1898)), Land und Herrschaft: Grundfragen der territorialen Verfassungsgeschichte Österreichs im Mittelalter, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. and Tullock, G. (1962), The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M. and Morrow, J. D. (2003), The Logic of Political Survival, Boston, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bunn, H. T. and Gurtov, A. N. (2014), ‘Prey mortality profiles indicate that early Pleistocene Homo at Olduvai was an ambush predator’, Quaternary International, 322/323, 16 February.Google Scholar
Burbank, J. and Cooper, F. (2011), Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capoccia, G. (2015), ‘Critical juncture and institutional change’, in Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (eds.), Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–79.Google Scholar
Caravale, M. (1994), Ordinamenti giuridici dell’Europa Medioevale, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Carbon, J.-M., Peels, S. and Pirenne-Delforge, V. (2018), Collection of Greek Ritual Norms, 2 vols., Paris, Editions de Boccard.Google Scholar
Casella, A. and Weingast, B. R. (1995), ‘Elements of a theory of jurisdictional change’, in Eichengreen, B., Frieden, J. and von Hagen, J. (eds.), Politics and Institutions in an Integrated Europe, New York, Springer, pp. 11–41.Google Scholar
Casey, G. (2009), ‘The indefensibility of political representation’, talk given at the Austrian Scholars Conference, 13 March.Google Scholar
Chapais, B. (2013), ‘Monogamy, strongly bonded groups and the evolution of human social structure’, Evolutionary Anthropology, 22: 52–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chehabi, H. E. and Stephan, A. (eds.) (1995), Politics, Society, and Democracy: Comparative Studies, Boulder, CO, Westview Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, J. A. and Limogi, F. (2002), ‘Democratic institutions and regime survival: parliamentary and presidential democracies reconsidered’,Annual Review of Political Science, 5: 151–79.Google Scholar
Cheibub, J. A., Elkins, J. and Ginsburg, T. (2010), ‘Latin American presidentialism in comparative and historical perspective’, Texas Law Review, 89: 170–3.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Boston, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cole, S. (1970), The Neolithic Revolution, London, Trustees of the British Museum.Google Scholar
Congleton, R. D. and Swedenborg, B. (eds.) (2006), Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy, Boston, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cook, K. S. and Levi, M. (eds.) (1990), The Limits of Rationality, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., Franks, N. R. and Levin, S. A. (2005), ‘Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move’, Nature, 433, 7025: 513–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A. (2011), ‘Can Darwinism improve Binghamton?’, New York Review of Books, 9 September.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. E. S. and Ostrom, E. (1995), ‘A grammar of institutions’, American Political Science Review, 89: 582–600.Google Scholar
Croce, M. (2014), ‘Is law a special domain? On the boundary between the legal and the social’, in Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L. (eds.), Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives, Burlington, VT, Ashgate, pp. 153–67.Google Scholar
Czada, R., Héritier, A. and Keman, H. (1996), ‘Introduction’, in Czada, R., Héritier, A. and Keman, H. (eds.), Institutions and Political Choice: On the Limits of Rationality, Amsterdam, VU University Press, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
Czada, R., Héritier, A. and Keman, H. (eds.) (1996), Institutions and Political Choice: On the Limits of Rationality, Amsterdam, VU University Press.Google Scholar
Daalder, H. (1971), ‘On building consociational nations: the case of the Netherlands and Switzerland’, International Social Science Journal, 23: 355–70.Google Scholar
Daalder, H. (1984), ‘On the origins of the consociational model’, Acta Politica, 19: 97–116.Google Scholar
Daalder, H. (1995), ‘Paths towards state formation in Europe: democratization, bureaucratization and politicization’, in Chehabi, H. E. and Stephan, A. (eds.), Politics, Society, and Democracy: Comparative Studies, Boulder, CO, Westview Press, pp. 113–30.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1971), Poliarchy, Participation and Opposition, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1868), The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, vol. 1, London, John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871), The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, London, John Murray.Google Scholar
Dawes, C. T. and Fawler, J. H. (2009), ‘Partisanship, voting, and the dopamine D receptor gene’, Journal of Politics, 71: 1157–71.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (2012), Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter, New York, W. W. Norton & Company Inc.Google Scholar
de Fina, S. (1974), Diritto e società, Milan, Giuffré.Google Scholar
de Jouvenel, B. (1963), The Pure Theory of Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Jouvenel, B. (1992 (1959)), ‘Authority: the efficient imperative’, in Hale, D. and Landy, M. (eds.), The Nature of Politics: Selected Essays of Bertrand de Jouvenel, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction, pp. 84–93.Google Scholar
del Mar, M. (2014), ‘Beyond the state in and of legal theory’, in Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L. (eds.), Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives, Burlington, VT, Ashgate, pp. 19–42.Google Scholar
del Mar, M. and Bankowski, Z. (eds.) (2009), Law as Institutional Normative Order, Farnham, Ashgate.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. (1989), Peace-Making among Primates, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Waal, F. (2005), Our Inner Ape, New York, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. (2010), The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society, Portland, OR, Broadway Books.Google Scholar
di Carlo, L. (2017), Teoria istituzionale e ragionamento giuridico, Turin, Giappichelli.Google Scholar
di Maggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1991), ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, in Powell, W. W. and Di Maggio, P. J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, pp. 41–62.Google Scholar
Doering, H. (ed.) (12995), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, New York, St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L. (eds.) (2014), Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives, Burlington, VT, Ashgate.Google Scholar
Drewry, G. (1998), ‘Political institutions: legal perspectives’, in Goodin, R. E. and Klingemann, H. D. (eds.), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 191–204.Google Scholar
Dubreuil, B. (2008), ‘Strong reciprocity and the emergence of large-scale societies’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 38: 192–210.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1919) Les règles de la méthode sociologique, Paris, Librairie Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Duverger, M. (1960, 5th ed.), Institutions Politiques et Droit Constitutionnel, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Duverger, M. (1980), ‘A new political system model: semi-presidential government’, European Journal of Political Research, 8: 165–87.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2004), ‘Hart’s postscript and the character of political philosophy’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 37: 119–37.Google Scholar
Earle, T. K. (1997), How Chiefs Came to Power: The Political Economy of Prehistory, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Easton, D. (1990), The Analysis of Political Structures, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, E. (1936), Foundational Principles of the Sociology of Law, New York, Russel and Russel.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, B., Frieden, J. and von Hagen, J. (eds.) (1995), Politics and Institutions in an Integrated Europe, New York, Springer.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. (1963), The Political Systems of Empires: The Rise and Fall of the Historical Bureaucratic Societies, New York, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1968), ‘Social institutions: the concept’, in International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, London, The Macmillan Company, vol. 14, pp. 409–29.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. and Giesen, B. (1995), ‘The construction of collective identity’, Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 36: 72–104.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. and Rokkan, S. (eds.) (1973), Building States and Nations, 2 vols., New York, Sage.Google Scholar
Elazar, D. E. (1987), Exploring Federalism, Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Elgie, R. (ed.) (2001), Divided Government in Comparative Perspective, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, R. (1991), Order without Law: How Neighbours Settle Disputes, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2007), Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A (1961), Modern Organizations, Hempstead, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1975), A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations, New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. (2010), Compound Democracies: Why the United States and Europe Are Becoming Similar, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Favre, P. (1976), La décision de majorité, Paris, Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
Favre, P. (1988), La Decisione di Maggioranza, Milan, Giuffré.Google Scholar
Fawler, J. H. and Dawes, C. T. (2008), ‘Two genes predict voter turnout’, Journal of Politics 70: 579–94.Google Scholar
Fawler, J. H., Baker, L. A. and Dawes, C. T. (2008), ‘Genetic variation in political participation’, American Political Science Review, 102: 233–48.Google Scholar
Ferguson, B. (2018), ‘Perché combattiamo?’, Le Scienze, no. 603, November, pp. 72–7.Google Scholar
Ferrante, M. and Zan, S. (1994), Il fenomeno organizzativo, Rome, La Nuova Italia Scientifica.Google Scholar
Ferraro, J. V. et al. (2013), ‘Earliest archaeological evidence of persistent hominin carnivory’, PLoS ONE, 8, 4, article N.162164.Google Scholar
Finer, S. E. (1979), Five Constitutions, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Finer, S. E. (1997), The History of Government, 3 vols., Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, A. R. (2001), ‘Evolutionary perspectives on the origins of human social institutions’, in Runciman, W. G. (ed.), The Origins of Human Social Institutions, Proceedings of The British Academy, New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 192–3.Google Scholar
Frantz, C. and Schubert, K. (eds.) (2010), Einführung in die Politikwissenschaft, Hamburg, Lit.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. (1990), ‘Institutions matter: the comparative analysis of institutions’, European Economic Review, 34: 443–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, B. (2006), ‘Comparative federalism’, in Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S. A. and Rockman, B. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 261–80.Google Scholar
Gandhi, J. and Przeworski, A. (2007), ‘Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats’, Comparative Political Studies, 40: 1279–1301.Google Scholar
Ganghof, S. (2003), ‘Premises and pitfalls of veto player analysis’, Swiss Political Science Review, 9: 1–25.Google Scholar
Garrett, E., Graddy, E. and Jackson, H. (eds.) (2008), Fiscal Challenges: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Budget Policy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, L. (1993), Les Sources du droit canonique (VIIIe–XXe siècles), Paris, Cerf.Google Scholar
Geddes, B., Wright, J. and Frantz, E. (2014), ‘Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: a new data set’, Perspectives on Politics, 12: 313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giglioli, P. P. (1989), ‘Teorie dell’azione’, in Panebianco, A. (ed.), L’ analisi della politica. Tradizioni di ricerca, modelli, teorie, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 107–33.Google Scholar
Gilison, J. (1967), ‘New factors of stability in Soviet collective leadership’, World Politics, 19: 563–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T. (ed.) (2012), Comparative Constitutional Design, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T., Elkins, Z. and Blount, J. (2009), ‘Does the process of constitution making matter?’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5: 201–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T., Elkins, Z. and Melton, J. (2012), ‘Do executive term limits cause constitutional crises?’, in Ginsburg, T. (ed.), Comparative Constitutional Design, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 350–79.Google Scholar
Gintis, H. (2000), ‘Strong reciprocity and human sociability’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 43: 169–79.Google Scholar
Girard, R. (1972), La Violence et le Sacré, Paris, Grassett (English translation: (1977), Violence and the Sacred, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Girotto, V., Pievani, T. and Vallortigara, G. (2008), Nati per credere. Perché il nostro cervello sembra predisposto a fraintendere la teoria di Darwin, Turin, Codice Edizioni.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (1966), The Theory of Institutional Design, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. and Klingemann, H. D. (eds.) (1998), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, B. A. T., Miller, M. K. and Strøm, K. W. (2017) ‘Safeguarding democracy: power sharing and democratic survival’, American Political Science Review, 111: 686–704.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985), ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.Google Scholar
Green, R. E., Krause, J., Briggs, A. W. et al. (2010), ‘A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome’, Science, 328, 5979: 710–22.Google Scholar
Greenstein, F. I. and Polsby, N. W. (eds.) (1975), The Handbook of Political Science, 8 vols, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R. (2008), ‘Introduction’, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, London, Sage, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R. (eds.) (2008), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, London, Sage.Google Scholar
Greif, A. and Kingston, C. (2011), ‘Institutions: rules or equilibria’, in Schofield, N. and Caballero, G. (eds.), Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy and Voting, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp. 13–43.Google Scholar
Greif, A. and Laitin, D. (2004), ‘A theory of endogenous institutional change’, American Political Science Review, 98: 633–52.Google Scholar
Gretchen, H. and Levitsky, S. (2004), ‘Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda’, Perspectives on Politics, 2: 725–40.Google Scholar
Grimm, D. (1993), Diritto e politica, in Enciclopedia delle Scienze Sociali, Turin, Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana Treccani, vol. 3, pp. 113–19.Google Scholar
Gross, E. and Etzioni, A. (1985), Organizations in Society, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discursive Theory of Law and Democracy, Boston, MA, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hage, J. (2009), ‘What is a legal transaction?’, in del Mar, M. and Bankowski, Z. (eds.), Law as Institutional Normative Order, Farnham, Ashgate, pp. 104–21.Google Scholar
Hale, D. and Landy, M. (eds.) (1992), The Nature of Politics: Selected Essays of Bertrand de Jouvenel, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. R. (1996), ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms’, Political Studies, 44: 936–57.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964a), ‘The genetical evolution of social behaviour’, I, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7: 1–16.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964b), ‘Genetic evolution of social behaviour’, II, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7: 17–52.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (2006), ‘Development of civil society’, in Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S. A. and Rockman, B. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 131–43.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1961 (1994)), The Concept of Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1961), The Law as a Union of Primary and Secondary Rule, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, D., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. and Tierney, M. J. (2006), Delegation under Anarchy: Principals, Agents, and International Organizations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayden, B. (2011), ‘Feasting and social dynamics in the Epipaleolithic of the Fertile Crescent’, in Aranda Jimenez, G., Monton-Subias, S. and Sanchez Romero, M. (eds.), Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner: Feasting Rituals in Prehistoric Societies of Europe and the Near East, Oxford, Oxbow Books, pp. 30–63.Google Scholar
Héritier, A. (1999), Policy-Making and Diversity in Europe: Escape from Deadlock, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Héritier, A. (2007), Explaining Institutional Change in Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, R. (2013), ‘From comparative constitutional law to comparative constitutional studies’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11: 1–12.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (2012 (1651)), Leviathan or The Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W. N. (1913), ‘Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning’, in Patterson, D. (ed.), Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory: An Anthology, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 295–321.Google Scholar
Holden, M. (2006), ‘Exclusion, inclusion and political institutions’, in Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S. A. and Rockman, B. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 163–90.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, R. J. (2000), ‘Doing institutional analysis: implications for the study of innovations’, Review of International Political Economy, 7: 595–644.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2003), ‘Unraveling the central state but how? Types of multi-level governance’, American Political Science Review, 97: 223–43.Google Scholar
Horowitz, D. (2002), ‘Constitutional design: proposals versus processes’, in Reynolds, A. (ed.), The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 15–36.Google Scholar
Huber, J. D. and Shipan, C. R. (2009), ‘Politics, delegation, and bureaucracy’, in Goodin, R. E. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 849–65.Google Scholar
Hudgson, G. M. (2006), ‘What are institutions?’, Journal of Economic Issues, 40: 1–25.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. (1968), Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ieraci, G. (1994a), ‘Presidenzialismo e parlamentarismo nelle “Democrazie Difficili”’, Quaderni di scienza politica, I: 35–78.Google Scholar
Ieraci, G. (1994b), ‘Forms of democratic government: a study of the impact of institutions on political competition’, Oxford, Centre for European Studies, Discussion Paper no. 32, July.Google Scholar
Imbeau, L. M. and Petry, F. (eds.) (2004), Politics, Institutions, and Fiscal Policy: Deficits and Surpluses in Federated States, London, Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Immergut, E. (1998), ‘The theoretical core of the New Institutionalism’, Politics and Society, 26, 1: 5–34.Google Scholar
Jacoby, S. (1985), Wild Justice: The Evolution of Revenge, London, William Collins.Google Scholar
Jepperson, R. L. (2000), ‘The development and application of sociological institutionalism’, in Berger, J. and Zelditch, M. Jr (eds.), New Directions in Sociological Theory: The Growth of Contemporary Theories, Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 229–66.Google Scholar
Jones, T. (2006), ‘We always have a beer after the meeting: how norms, customs, conventions, and the like explain behavior’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36: 251–75.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1958 (1797)), Groundwork of the Methaphisic of Morals, New York, Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Kappeler, P. M. and Silk, J. (eds.) (2010), Mind the Gap: Tracing the Origins of Human Universals, Frankfurt, Springer.Google Scholar
Kassim, H. and Menon, A. (2003), ‘The principal-agent approach and the study of European Union: promise unfulfilled?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 10: 121–39.Google Scholar
Katnelson, I. and Zolberg, A. R. (eds.) (1986), Working Class Formation in Western Europe and the United States, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Katoh, S. et al. (2016), ‘New geological and paleontological age constraint for the gorilla-human lineage split’, Nature, 530, 35: 215–18, doi: 10.1038/nature16510.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1934), Reine Rechtslehre: Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik, Leipzig, Deuticke (English version: (1967), The Pure Theory of Law, Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1945), General Theory of Law and the State, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. (2001), ‘Governance in a partially globalized world’, American Political Science Review, 95: 1–13.Google Scholar
Khalil, E. (1995), ‘Organizations versus Institutions’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics/Zeitscrift fur die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 151: 445–66.Google Scholar
King, A. J., Johnson, D. P. and Van Vugt, M. (2009), ‘The origins and evolution of leadership’, Current Biology, 19: 11–16.Google Scholar
Kingston, C. G. and Wright, R. E. (2010), ‘The deadliest of games: the institution of duelling’, Southern Economic Journal, 76: 1094–1106.Google Scholar
Kiser, E. (1999), ‘Comparing varieties of agency theory in economics, political science, and sociology: an illustration from state policy implementation’, Sociological Theory, 17: 146–70.Google Scholar
Knight, J. (1992), Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, J. and Send, I. (eds.) (1995), Explaining Social Institutions, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kourikoski, J. and Lehtinen, A. (2010), ‘Economic imperialism and solution concepts in political science’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 4: 347–70.Google Scholar
Kramer, J. and Meunier, J. (2016), ‘Kin and multilevel selection in social evolution: a never-ending controversy’, F1000Research, 5: 776.Google Scholar
Krasner, D. (1999), Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krol, G. (2020), ‘Legislating parliaments in authoritarian regimes: Eurasian legislatures and presidents compared’, Florence, European University Institute, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Lane, J.-E. and Ersson, S. (2000), The New Institutional Politics: Performance and Outcomes, New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. and Kaplan, A. (1950), Power and Society: A Framework for Political Enquiry, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Laver, M. and Shepsle, K. A. (eds.) (1994), Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Government, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. (2008), ‘Power, institutions and organizations’, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, London, Sage, pp. 170–97.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, S. A. with Register, K. E. (2003), Constant Battles: The Myth of the Peaceful, Noble Savage, London, St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Lee, R. B. and DeVore, I. (eds.) (1968), Man the Hunter, New York, Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Leoni, B. (1961), Freedom and the Law, Indianapolis, IN, Liberty Fund (Italian version: (1994), La libertà e la legge, Liberilibri di AMA, Macerata).Google Scholar
Levi, M. (1990), A Logic of Institutional Change, in Cook, K. S. and Levi, M. (eds.), The Limits of Rationality, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, pp. 402–19.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. (1969), Convention, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, O. and Steinmo, S. (2012), ‘How institutions evolve: evolutionary theory and institutional change’, Polity, 44: 314–39.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. E. (2014), The Story of the Human Body: Evolution, Health and Diseases, London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1968), The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands, Berkeley, University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1984), Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (2004), ‘Constitutional design for divided societies’, Journal of Democracy, 15: 96–109.Google Scholar
Linz, J. J. (1994), ‘Presidential and parliamentary democracy: does it make a difference?’, in Linz, J. J. and Valenzuela, A. (eds.), The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 34–9.Google Scholar
Linz, J. J. and Valenzuela, A. (eds.) (1994), The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1988 (1689)), Two Treaties of Government, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, K. (1965), Political Power and the Governmental Process, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lord, R. H. (1930), ‘The parliaments of the Middle Ages and the early modern period’, Catholic Historical Review, 16: 125–8.Google Scholar
Lorini, G. (2014), ‘Meta-institutional concepts: a new category for social ontology’, Rivista di Estetica, 56: 127–39.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, C. O. (2009), ‘Reexamining human origins in light of Ardipithecus Ramidus’, Science, 326: 74–8.Google Scholar
Low, A. J. (2003), Manhood and the Duel: Masculinity in Early Modern Drama and Culture, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. (2007), Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macintyre, A. (2003), The Power of Institutions, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D. (eds.) (2003), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (2010), ‘A theory of gradual institutional change’, in Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power, New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (eds.) (2010), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power, New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (eds.) (2015), Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. (1993), ‘Presidentialism, multipartism, and democracy: the difficult combination’, Comparative Political Studies, 26: 198–228.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1993), The Sources of Social Power, vol. 2: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mantzavinos, C., North, D. C. and Shariq, S. (2004), ‘Learning, institutions, and economic performance’, Perspectives on Politics, 2: 75–84.Google Scholar
Manzanilla, L. R. (2009), ‘Corporate life in apartment and barrio compounds at Teotihuacan Central Mexico’, in Manzanilla, L. R. and Chapdelaine, C. (eds.), Domestic Life in Prehispanic Capitals: A Study of Specialization, Hierarchy, and Ethnicity, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, pp. 21–42.Google Scholar
Manzanilla, L. R. and Chapdelaine, C. (eds.) (2009), Domestic Life in Prehispanic Capitals: A Study of Specialization, Hierarchy, and Ethnicity, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology,Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York, The Free Press.Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (2006), ‘Elaborating the “New Institutionalism”’, in Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S. A. and Rockman, B. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 3-20.Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1959), Organizations, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
March, J. G., Schulz, M. and Zhou, X. (2000), The Dynamics of Rules: Changes in Written Organizational Codes, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Margalit, E. U. (1977), The Emergence of Norms, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Margalit, E. U. (1978), ‘Invisible-hand explanations’, Synthèse, 39: 263–91.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. (1984), Constitutional Conventions: The Rules and Forms of Political Accountability, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. (ed.) (1989), Ministerial Responsibility, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, T. W. (1968), ‘Social institutions: a reformulation of the concept’, Pacific Sociological Review, 11: 100–10.Google Scholar
Maryland v. Louisiana, 451 U.S. 725, 746 (1981).Google Scholar
Mattei, U. (1997), ‘Three patterns of law: taxonomy and change in the world’s legal systems’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 45: 5–44.Google Scholar
May, K. (1952), ‘A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decisions’, Econometrica, October, pp. 680–4.Google Scholar
Mayer, W. and Rowan, B. (1977), ‘Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–63.Google Scholar
McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. and Weingast, B. (1998), ‘Political control of the bureaucracy’, in Newman, P. (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and Law, London, Palgrave, pp. 50–5.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1990 (1940)), ‘War is only an invention – not a biological necessity’, in The Dolphin Reader, 2nd ed., Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin Company, pp. 415–21.Google Scholar
Ménard, C. (ed.) (2000), Institutions, Contracts and Organizations, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1940), ‘Bureaucratic structure and personality’, Social Forces, 18: 560–8.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. and Rowen, B. (1991), ‘Institutionalized organizations: formal structures as myth and ceremony’, in Powell, W. W. and Di Maggio, P. J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, pp. 63–82.Google Scholar
Mille, P. D. (2011, reprint), Deuteronomy, Westminster, John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. and Hammond, T. (1994), ‘Why politics is more fundamental than economics: incentive-compatible mechanisms are not credible’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6: 5–26.Google Scholar
Miller, M. K. (2015), ‘Democratic pieces: autocratic elections and democratic development since 1815’, British Journal of Political Science, 45: 501–30.Google Scholar
Mitchell, L. E. (1999), ‘Understanding norms’, University of Toronto Law Review, 49: 177–258.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. (1984), ‘The new economics of organization’, American Journal of Political Science, 28: 739–77.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. (1990), ‘Political institutions: the neglected side of the story’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6: 213–53.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. (2005), ‘Power and political institutions’, Perspectives on Politics, 3: 215–33.Google Scholar
Monod, J. (1971), Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology, New York, Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Monroe, K. R., Martin, A. and Ghosh, P. (2009), ‘Politics and an innate moral sense: scientific evidence for an old theory?’, Political Research Quarterly, 62: 614–34.Google Scholar
Moore, B. (1966), Social Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World, Boston, MA, Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Moreno, E. (2011), ‘The society of our “Out of Africa Ancestors” (I): the migrant warriors that colonized the world’, Communicative and Integrative Biology, 4: 1–9.Google Scholar
Morlino, L. (1998), Democracy between Consolidation and Crisis: Parties, Groups and Citizens in Southern Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelken, D. (2014), ‘Legal sociology and the sociology of norms’, in Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L. (eds.), Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives, Burlington, VT, Ashgate, pp. 138–51.Google Scholar
Nettl, P. J. (1968), ‘The state as a conceptual variable’, World Politics, 20: 560–92.Google Scholar
Newman, P. (ed.) (1998), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and Law, London, Palgrave.Google Scholar
Nocilla, D. and Ciaurro, L. (1987), ‘Rappresentanza politica’, in Enciclopedia del diritto, vol. 38, Milan, Giuffré, pp. 543–609.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, A. (1972), Conflict Regulation in Divided Societies, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1981), Structure and Change in Economic History, New York, Norton.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1994), ‘Economic performance through time’, The American Economic Review, 84: 359–68.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1995), ‘Five propositions about institutional change’, in Knight, J. and Send, I. (eds.), Explaining Social Institutions, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. and Wilson, H. E. O. (2010), ‘The evolution of eusociality’, Nature, 466, 7310: 1057–62.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974), Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (2006), ‘Political institutions and social power: conceptual explorations’, in Shapiro, I. et al. (eds.), Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State, New York, New York University Press, pp. 9–31.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. (2013), ‘The institutional basis of democratic accountability’, West European Politics, 36: 447–73.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, S. (2003), The Real Eve, New York, Carroll & Graft.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1986), ‘An agenda for the study of institutions’, Public Choice, 48: 3–25.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2010), ‘Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance and complex economic systems’, American Economic Review, 100: 1–33.Google Scholar
Panebianco, A. (ed.) (1989), L’ analisi della politica. Tradizioni di ricerca, modelli, teorie, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1937), The Structure of Social Action, New York, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1954), Essays in Sociological Theory, Glencoe, IL, Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1975), ‘Social structure and the symbolic media of exchange’, in Blau, P. M. (ed.), Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, New York, Free Press, pp. 94–120.Google Scholar
Parto, S. (2003), ‘Economic activity and institutions: taking stock’, Infonomics Research Memorandum Series, Maastricht.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. (ed.) (2003), Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory: An Anthology, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pejovich, S. (1999), ‘The effect of the interaction of formal and informal institutions on social stability and economic development’, Journal of Markets and Morality, 2: 164–81.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (1998), ‘Political institutions, old and new’, in Goodin, R. E. and Klingemann, H. D. (eds.), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 205–20.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (1999), Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’, London, Pinter.Google Scholar
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B. and Hardy, C. (2004), ‘Discourse and institutions’, Academy of Management Review, 29: 635–52.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000), ‘The limits of design: explaining institutional origins and change’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13: 475–99.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2004), Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011), The Better Angels of Our Nature, New York, Viking.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. (1967), The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Poggi, G. (2000), Durkheim, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollac, M. (1997), ‘Delegation, agency and agenda-setting in the European community’, International Organization 51: 99–134.Google Scholar
Polsby, N. W. (1975), ‘Legislatures’, in Greenstein, F. I. and Polsby, N. W. (eds.), The Handbook of Political Science, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., vol. 5, pp. 277–91.Google Scholar
Popitz, H. (1992), Phaenomene der Macht, Tübingen, Mohr-Siebeck.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1963, 5th revised ed.), Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W. and Di Maggio, P. J. (eds.) (1991), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (2004), ‘Institutions matter?’, Government and Opposition, 39: 527–40.Google Scholar
Rakoczy, H. and Schmidt, M. F. H. (2013), ‘The early ontogeny of social norms’, Child Development Perspectives, 7: 17–21.Google Scholar
Rasch, B. E. and Congleton, R. D. (2006), ‘Amendment procedures and constitutional stability’, in Congleton, R. D. and Swedenborg, B. (eds.), Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy, Boston, MA, MIT Press, pp. 319–42.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2005), Political Liberalism, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1970), The Concept of a Legal System, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1999), Practical Reason and Norms, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (2009), The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2002), ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5: 243–63.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. (ed.) (2002), The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S. A. and Rockman, B. A. (eds.) (2006), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richieston, P. J. and Boyd, R. (2001), ‘Institutional evolution in the Holocene: the rise of complex societies’, in Runciman, W. G. (ed.), The Origins of Human Social Institutions, Proceedings of The British Academy, New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 198–234.Google Scholar
Ridley, F. F. (1975), ‘Political Institutions: the script not the play’, Political Studies, 23: 365–80.Google Scholar
Riker, W. H. (1975), ‘Federalism’, in Greenstein, F. I. and Polsby, N. W. (eds.), The Handbook of Political Science, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., vol. 5, pp. 93–172.Google Scholar
Riker, W. H. (1980), ‘Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions’, American Political Science Review, 74: 432–44.Google Scholar
Riker, W. H. (1992), ‘The justification of bicameralism’, International Political Science Review, 13: 101–16.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (1970), ‘Nation building, cleavage formation and the structuring of mass politics’, in Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Process of Development, Oslo, Universitetsforlaget, pp. 79–82.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (1973), ‘Cities, states, and nations: a dimensional model for the history of contrasts in development’, in Eisenstadt, S. N. and Rokkan, S. (eds.), Building States and Nations, New York, Sage, vol. 2, pp. 73–97.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (1999), State Formation, Nation Building, and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan, edited by Flora, P. with Kuhnle, S. and Urwin, D., Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romer, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1978), ‘Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo’, Public Choice, 33: 27–43.Google Scholar
Roth, M. T. (1995), Law Collection from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor, Atlanta, GA, Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, B. (1998), ‘Political institutions: an overview’, in Goodin, R. E. and Klingemann, H. D. (eds.), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 104–25.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (2012 (1762)), The Social Contract, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Ruffini, A. (1976 (1927)), Il principio maggioritario: profilo storico, Milan, Adelphi.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. (1993), ‘Territoriality and beyond: problematising modernity in international relations’, International Organization, 47: 138–74.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G. (ed.) (2001), The Origins of Human Social Institutions, Proceedings of The British Academy, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, M. (2001), ‘What are second chambers for?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 54, 3: 442–58.Google Scholar
Salamini, F. et al. (2002), ‘Genetics and geography of wild cereals domestication in the Near East’, Nature Reviews Genetics, 3: 429–41.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1963), Democrazia e definizioni, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1974), ‘Tecniche decisionali e sistema dei comitati’, Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 4: 5–42.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1987), The Theory of Democracy Revisited Part One: The Contemporary Debate, Chatham, Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1991), ‘Comparing and Miscomparing’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3: 243–57.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1997), Comparative Constitutional Engineering, New York, New York University Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. (1995), ‘Essai sur la démocratie dans les systèmes de négotiation’, in Telò, M. (ed.), Démocratie et construction européenne, Brussels, Editions de L’université de Bruxelles, pp. 145–69.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. (1997), Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, New York, Westview Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (2000), ‘Institutions in comparative policy research’, Comparative Political Studies, 33: 762–90.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. (1994), Taking Electoral Promises Seriously: Reflections on the Content of Procedural Democracy, IPSA, Berlin, August.Google Scholar
Schipman, P. (2014), ‘How do you kill 86 mammoths?’, Quaternary International, 30: 1–9.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. (2006), Sie bauten die ersten Tempel. Das rätselhafte Heiligtum der Steinzeitjäger, Munich, C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. F. H. et al. (2012), ‘Young children enforce social norms’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21: 232–36.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2004), On the Three Types of Juristic Thought, Westport, CT, Praeger.Google Scholar
Schofield, N. and Caballero, G. (eds.) (2011), Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy and Voting, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schotter, A. (1981), The Economic Theory of Social Institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. (2008, 3rd ed., first 1995), Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2005), ‘What is an institution?’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 1: 1–22.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2010), Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2012), Speech Acts, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. (1957), Leadership in Organization, London, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1964), ‘Preferences, votes and the transitivity of majority decisions’, Review of Economic Studies, 31: 163–5.Google Scholar
Service, E. (1975), Origins of the State and Civilization, New York, Random House.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. et al. (eds.) (2006), Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State, New York, New York University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. (1969), ‘Collective leadership as lack of leadership’, Survey, Winter/Spring, pp. 193–200.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. P. (2005), ‘Agency theory’, Annual Review of Sociology, 31 (August): 263–84.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. A. (1986), ‘Institutional equilibrium and equilibrium institutions’, in Weisberg, H. (ed.), The Science of Politics, New York, Agathon, pp. 51–82.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. A. (1989), ‘Studying institutions: some lessons from the rational choice approach’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1: 131–47.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. A. (2006), ‘Rational choice institutionalism’, in Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S. A. and Rockman, B. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. A. and Weingast, B. R. (2010), ‘Why so much stability? Majority voting, legislative institutions, and Gordon Tullock’. Paper, March.Google Scholar
Shugart, M. S. and Carey, J. M. (1992), Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957), Administrative Behavior, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sjoblom, G. (1993), ‘Some critical remarks on March and Olsen’s “Rediscovering Institutions”’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 5: 397–40.Google Scholar
Sjoblom, G. (1994), ‘Notes on the Concept of “Institution”’, paper presented at the XVI World Congress of the International Political Science Association, 21–25 August, Berlin.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1979), States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, H. J. (2005), Parenting for Primates, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. E. et al. (2016), ‘Leadership in mammalian societies: emergence, distribution, power, and payoff’, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31: 54–66.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (1991 (1670)), Theologico-Political Treatise, Indianapolis, IN, Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Spitzer, S. (1975), ‘Punishment and social organization: a study of Durkheim’s theory of penal evolution’, Law & Society Review, 9: 613–38.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. and Longstreth, F. (eds.) (1992), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. (1987), ‘Principal and agent’, in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 3, pp. 966–71.Google Scholar
Stiner, M. C. et al. (2009), ‘Cooperative hunting and meat sharing 400–200 kya at Qesem Cave, Israel’, Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences, 32, 106: 13207–12.Google Scholar
Stoppino, M. (2001, 3rd ed.), Potere e teoria politica, Milan: Giuffré.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. (1985), ‘Community, market, state – and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order’, European Sociological Review, 1: 119–38.Google Scholar
Strøm, K. (2000), ‘Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 37: 261–89.Google Scholar
Strøm, K., Müller, W. C. and Bergman, T. (eds.) (2006), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stueber, K. R. (2005), ‘How to think about rules and rule following’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35: 307–23.Google Scholar
Styron, W. (1976), Sophie’s Choice, New York, Random House.Google Scholar
Suarez-Rodriguez, J. J. (2016), ‘Le fondement des principes juridiques: une question problématique’, Civilizar, 16: 51–62.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, S. (2005), Human Sacrifice, Militarism and Rulership: Materialization of State Ideology at the Feathered Serpent Pyramid, Teotihuacan, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1989), ‘A critique of Darwinian anthropology’, Ethology and Sociobiology, 10: 131–44.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. (1976), Anarchy or Cooperation, London, Wiley (revised as: (1987), The Possibility of Cooperation, New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Telò, M. (ed.) (1995), Démocratie et construction européenne, Brussels, Editions de L’université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Tharakan, G. (2007), ‘The Maduga and Kurumba of Kerala, South India, and the social organisation of the hunting and gathering’, Journal of Ecological Anthropology, 11: 12–13.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2003), ‘How institutions evolve: insights from comparative historical analysis’, in Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D. (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–40.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. and Steinmo, S. (1992), ‘Historical institutionalism in comparative politics’, in Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. and Longstreth, F. (eds.), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (1987), 6 vols., London, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (ed.) (1975), The Formation of National States in Western Europe, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tomain, J. P. (1973), ‘Executive agreements and the bypassing of congress’, The Journal of International Law and Economics, 8: 129–32.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003), Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2014), A Natural History of Human Thinking, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2016), A Natural History of Human Morality, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2018), ‘L’origine della moralità’, Le Scienze, November, pp. 66–71.Google Scholar
Traenhardt, D. (2010), ‘Mehr Demokratie oder mehr Gewaltenteilung?’, in Frantz, C. and Schubert, K. (eds.), Einführung in die Politikwissenschaft, Hamburg, Lit, pp. 91–111.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1971), ‘The evolution of reciprocal altruism’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 46: 35–57.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (1990), Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (1995), ‘Decision making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartism’, British Journal of Political Science, 25: 289–325.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (2002), Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. and Rasch, B. E. (1995), ‘Patterns of bicameralism’, in Doering, H. (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, New York, St Martin’s Press, pp. 365–90.Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. (1995), The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. (2007), The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuschhoff, C. (1999), ‘The compounding effect: the impact of federalism on the concept of representation’, West European Politics, 22: 16–33.Google Scholar
Uhr, J. (2006), ‘Bicameralism’, in Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S. A. and Rockman, B. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 474–93.Google Scholar
Urpelainen, U. (2011), ‘The origins of social institutions’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 23: 215–40.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, J. (2011), ‘A short history of studying incremental institutional change: does explaining institutional change provide any new explanations?’, Regulation and Governance, 4: 230–43.Google Scholar
van Hees, M. (1997), ‘Explaining institutions: a defense of reductionism’, European Journal of Political Research, 32: 51–69.Google Scholar
van Vugt, M., Hogan, R. and Kaiser, R. B. (2008), ‘Leadership, followership, and evolution: some lessons from the past’, American Psychologist, 63: 182–96.Google Scholar
Vinogradoff, P. (ed.) (2004), Essays in Legal History, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Volpi, E. (2019), ‘The politics of turning coat: a comparative and historical analysis of party switching’. Florence, European University Institute, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
von Gierke, O. (2004 (1913)), ‘Uber die Geschichte des Majoritatsprinzips’, in Vinogradoff, P. (ed.), Essays in Legal History, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 312–35.Google Scholar
Wallis, J. and Weingast, B. (2008), ‘Dysfunctional or optimal institutions? State debt limitations, the structure of state and local governments, and the finance of American infrastructure’, in Garrett, E., Graddy, E. and Jackson, H. (eds.), Fiscal Challenges: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Budget Policy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 331–65.Google Scholar
Walsh, A. (2000), ‘Evolutionary psychology and the origins of justice’, Justice Quarterly, 17: 841–64.Google Scholar
Washburn, S. L. and Lancaster, C. S. (1968), ‘The evolution of hunting’, in Lee, R. B. and DeVore, I. (eds.), Man the Hunter, New York, Aldine Publishing Company, chapter 32.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978 (1922)), Economy and Society, edited by Roth, G. and Wittich, C., Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, H. (ed.) (1986), The Science of Politics, New York, Agathon.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1966), Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1990), Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (2002), ‘The theory of the firm as governance structure: from choice to contract’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16: 171–95.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (2015), Does Altruism Exist? Culture, Genes, and the Welfare of Others, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. and Wilson, H. E. O. (2007), ‘Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology’, The Quarterly Review of Biology, 82: 327–48.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. E. O. (1975), Sociobiology, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, K. (2014), ‘L’ascesa del predatore umano’, Le Scienze, 554: 54–9.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, D. (1994), Ministers and Parliament: Accountability in Theory and Practice, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Woodman, G. (2009), ‘Ideological combs and social observations: recent debates about legal pluralism’, Journal of Law and Society, 42: 21–59.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R. (2019), The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution, New York, Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Wright, G. (2006), Slavery and American Economic Development, Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, H. (1977), ‘Recent research on the origin of the state’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 6: 379–97.Google Scholar
Xenophon (317 BCE (1914)), Cyropaedia, 7 vols, translated by W. Miller, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zeder, M. A. (2007), ‘The neolithic macro (re)evolution: macroevolutionary theory and the study of culture change’, Journal of Archaeological Research, 17: 611–63.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Stefano Bartolini, European University Institute, Florence
  • Book: Rule-Making Rules
  • Online publication: 16 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009206303.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Stefano Bartolini, European University Institute, Florence
  • Book: Rule-Making Rules
  • Online publication: 16 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009206303.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Stefano Bartolini, European University Institute, Florence
  • Book: Rule-Making Rules
  • Online publication: 16 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009206303.009
Available formats
×