Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- The Names’ Two Bodies: Mary, Queen of Scots, Elizabeth I, and the Politics of Correspondence
- “Of that Wide Gap”: Liminality and the Gap of Time in The Winter’s Tale
- “To kill a Wife with Kindness”: Contextualizing Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew
- The Harvest of Mysticism in English Renaissance Literature: Ascesis in Spenser and Shakespeare— “silencing the tumult of the flesh”
- A House of Spiderwebs: George Herbert and the Estate Poem
- The Judith Narrative in Margaret Tyler’s Mirror of Princely Deeds
- Knowing Owen: Merry and Satirical Epitaphs on a Butler of Christ Church, Oxford
- Margaret Cavendish and Ben Jonson: Ladies’ Spaces, Boy Actors, and Wit
- Parnassus Commodified: Ben Jonson and the Printing of Value
Knowing Owen: Merry and Satirical Epitaphs on a Butler of Christ Church, Oxford
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2020
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- The Names’ Two Bodies: Mary, Queen of Scots, Elizabeth I, and the Politics of Correspondence
- “Of that Wide Gap”: Liminality and the Gap of Time in The Winter’s Tale
- “To kill a Wife with Kindness”: Contextualizing Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew
- The Harvest of Mysticism in English Renaissance Literature: Ascesis in Spenser and Shakespeare— “silencing the tumult of the flesh”
- A House of Spiderwebs: George Herbert and the Estate Poem
- The Judith Narrative in Margaret Tyler’s Mirror of Princely Deeds
- Knowing Owen: Merry and Satirical Epitaphs on a Butler of Christ Church, Oxford
- Margaret Cavendish and Ben Jonson: Ladies’ Spaces, Boy Actors, and Wit
- Parnassus Commodified: Ben Jonson and the Printing of Value
Summary
IN the early seventeenth century, the scholars of Christ Church College at Oxford University experienced a series of devastating losses: the much-beloved Prince Henry (1612), then Queen Anne (1619), King James I (1625), the firstborn child of King Charles I (1629), the Christ Church College butler, Owen (c. 1630s), and many other individuals both famous and local died. In many instances, the bereaved scholars marked these losses with one or several epitaphs, and these poetical reminiscences could take one of several forms. Joshua Scodel notes the early epitaphic contrasts between “small” and “great,” both in terms of literary genres and societal divisions, and there were many other epitaphic subgenres as well. The compiler of two elaborate manuscripts called some of the potentially “great” verses—particularly those describing deceased nobility—“Epitaphs: Laudatory,” and separated out a second selection of poems under the label, “Epitaphs: Merry and Satirical.” Texts in the former group might often be confused with elegies (also often “great” or laudatory), the form's affiliation with tombstones often afforded them comparative brevity. Although the historical, classical epitaph might, as Ian McFarlane suggests, convey a “morbid humour,” many merry, satirical, or otherwise “light” epitaphs might not have been welcome within the gravity of a church or even a graveyard. While authorial introspection, such as reflection on the poet's own feelings of loss, is common in classical and Renaissance epitaphs, most merry and satirical epitaphs elevate their authors’ wittiness far above actual commemoration of their subjects’ lives or virtues. We know very little about the “one Whose Name Was Moore,” for instance; his epitaph reads (in its entirety): “Here lies Moore, and no moore but Hee; / Moore, and no moore: how can that bee.” Moore's gender can be inferred from the pronoun in the first line, but only his surname and its punning opposition to his mortal state were necessary for the amusement of the witty author and appreciative compilers. Many other merry and satirical epitaphs likewise prioritize jests and puns over specific commemorative statements. Some rare few merry epitaphs, however, celebrate specific, named individuals, whose commemorative verses describe essential roles their subjects held within local communities, or these same subjects’ dominant or most memorable character traits.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Renaissance Papers 2019 , pp. 85 - 94Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2020