General Bibliography

doi:10.1017/CBO9781316162378.013

Bydlinski, F., “Der Ersatz ideellen Schadens als sachliches und methodisches Problem”, JBl 1965, 181.Google Scholar

Karner, E., Der Ersatz ideeller Schäden bei Körperverletzung (Vienna: Springer 1999).CrossRef Google Scholar

Karner, E., and Koziol, H., Der Ersatz ideellen Schadens im österreichischen Recht und seine Reform, 15. Österreichischer Juristentag (vol. II/1, Vienna: Manz 2003).Google Scholar

Karner, E., and Koziol, H., “Non-pecuniary Loss under Austrian Law”, in Rogers, W.V. Horton (ed.), Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective (Vienna: Springer 2001).Google Scholar

Koziol, H., Basic Questions of Tort Law From a Germanic Perspective (Vienna: Jan Sramek Verlag 2013).Google Scholar

Koziol, H., Österreichisches Haftpflichtrecht (vol. I, 3rd edn., Vienna: Manz 1997).Google Scholar

Апостолов, И. Облигационно право. Общо учение за облигацията. С. 1947, [Apostolov, I., Law of obligations. General part (Sofia: 1947, 1990).]Google Scholar

Кожухаров, А. Общо учение за облигационното отношение. Част първа. С. 1992, с. 290. [Kozhuharov, A., Law of obligations. General Part. Book I (Sofia: 1992).]Google Scholar

Калайджиев, А. Облигационно право. Обща част. София, 2010 (A. Kalaidzhiev, Law of obligations. General Part (Sofia: 2010)).Google Scholar

Петров, В. Обезщетението за неимуществени вреди при договорната отговорност. С. 1992. [Petrov, V., The contractual liability for immaterial damage (Sofia: 1992).]Google Scholar

Голева, П. Отговорността на лекаря за вреди, причинени на пациента. София, 2004, [Goleva, P., Physician’s liability for harms caused to the patient (Sofia: 2004)].Google Scholar

Stoichev, K. “Bulgaria: Contracts”. International Encyclopedia of Laws (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999).Google Scholar

Стойчев, К. Преглед на съдебната практика относно неимуществените вреди- Правна мисъл, № 5. (K. Stoichev, Review of the case law on damages for immaterial harm– In: Pravna misal, No 5.).Google Scholar

Таджер, В. Право на обезщетение за неимуществени вреди-Правна мисъл, 1986, № 2. [Tadzher, V., Damages for non-pecuniary harm– In: Pravna Misal, 1986, No 2.]Google Scholar

Сталев, Ж. Договорна отговорност за неимуществени вреди- Държава и право, 1990, № 1. [Stalev, Zh., Contractual liability for immaterial damage- In: Darzhava i Pravo, 1990, No1.]Google Scholar

Бинева, В. Отговорност за неимуществени вреди при неизпълнение на договор за организирано туристическо пътуване- Правна мисъл, 2008, №1. [Bineva, V., Liability for non-pecuniary damage for breach of contract of package holiday– In: Pravna Misal, 2008, No1.]Google Scholar

Конов, Тр. Още веднъж за съотношението между договорна и деликтна отговорност и обезщетяването на неимуществените вреди- Търговско право, 2012, № 3. [Once again on the correlation between contractual and tort liability and moral damages- In: Targovsko pravo, 2012, No 3.]Google Scholar

Arseguel, A., and Reynes, B., “Rupture de la relation de travail et indemnisation du préjudice moral” Gaz Pal 1992-II, doctr, 935.Google Scholar

Bell, J.S., Boyron, S. Whittaker Principles of French Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).CrossRef Google Scholar

Chartier, Y., La réparation du préjudice (Paris: Dalloz 1983).Google Scholar

Fabre-Magnan, M., Droit des Obligations, vol. 2 (2nd edn., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 2010).Google Scholar

Givord, F., “La réparation du préjudice moral” (doctoral thesis, Grenoble, 1938).Google Scholar

Ivainer, T., “Le pouvoir souverain du juge dans l’appréciation des indemnités réparatrices” D 1972 Chron.7.Google Scholar

Jackson, B.S., “Injured feelings resulting from breach of contract” 26 ICLQ 502 (1977).CrossRef Google Scholar

Jourdain, P., “Les dommages-intérêts alloués par le juge. Rapport français” in Fontaine, M. and Viney, G. (eds.) Les sanctions de l’inexécution des obligations contractuelles, Etudes de droit comparé (Bruyant Bruxelles and LGDJ Paris 2001).Google Scholar

Le Pautremat, S., “Mitigation of Damages: A French Perspective” 55 ICLQ 205 (2006).CrossRef Google Scholar

Nicolesco, D., “Du dommage moral résultant de l’inexécution d’un contrat” (doctoral thesis, Paris, 1914).Google Scholar

Rowan, S., “Comparative Observations on the Introduction of Punitive Damages in French Law” in Cartwright, J., Whittaker, S., and Vogenauer, S. (eds.), Reforming the French Law of Obligations: Comparative Reflections on the Avant-Projet de Réforme du Droit des Obligations et de la Prescription (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2009).Google Scholar

Viney, G., and Jourdain, P., Traité de droit civil, Les effets de la responsabilité (2nd edn., Paris: LGDJ 2001).Google Scholar

Ady, Johannes, Ersatzansprüche wegen immaterieller Einbußen (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2004).Google Scholar

Bitter, Georg, “Wertverlust durch Nutzungsausfall,” 205 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis (AcP) (2005) p. 743–794.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bost, Jan-Patrick, Effiziente Verhaltenssteuerung durch den Ersatz von Nichtvermögensschäden (Berlin: Ducker & Humblot 2009).CrossRef Google Scholar

Braschos, Franz, Der Ersatz immaterieller Schäden im Vertragsrecht (Cologne: Heymanns 1979).Google Scholar

Deutsch, Erwin, “Die Medizinhaftung nach dem neuen Schuldrecht und dem neuen Schadensrecht,” Juristenzeitung (JZ) (2002) pp 588–593.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Erwin, “Schmerzensgeld für Vertragsverletzungen und bei Gefährdungshaftung,” Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik (ZRP) (2001) p. 351–354.Google Scholar

Erman, , Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (12th edn., Cologne: Dr Otto Schmidt 2008).Google Scholar

Funkel, Thorsten, Schutz der Persönlichkeit durch Ersatz immaterieller Schäden in Geld (Munich: Beck 2001).Google Scholar

Jaeger, Lothar, and Luckey, Jan, “Das Zweite Schadensersatzrechtsänderungsgesetz,” Monatsschrift für Deutsches Recht (MDR) (2002).Google Scholar

Jhering, Rudolf von, “Ein Rechtsgutachten, betreffend die Gäubahn,” 18 Jherings Jahrbücher für die Dogmatik des heutigen römischen und deutschen Privatrechts (1880).Google Scholar

Katzenmeier, Christian, Die Neuregelung des Anspruchs auf Schmerzensgeld, Juristenzeitung (JZ) (2002).Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Ekkehard, Dogmatische und rechtspolitische Grundlagen des § 253 BGB, 162 AcP (1963).Google Scholar

Köndgen, Johannes, Haftpflichtfunktionen und Immaterialschaden (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1976).Google Scholar

Kötz, Hein, and Wagner, Gerhard, Deliktsrecht (11th edn., Munich: Franz Vahlen 2010).Google Scholar

Küppers, Karsten, Verdorbene Genüsse und vereitelte Aufwendungen im Schadensersatzrecht (Karlsruhe: Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft 1976).Google Scholar

Lange, Hermann, and Schiemann, Gottfried, Schadensersatz (3rd edn., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2003).Google Scholar

Magnus, Ulrich, Schaden und Ersatz (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1987).Google Scholar

Magnus, Ulrich, and Fedtke, Jörg, “Non-Pecuniary Loss under German Law,” in Rogers, W.V. Horton (ed.), Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective (Vienna: Springer 2001).Google Scholar

Markesinis, Basil, and Unberath, Hannes, The German Law of Torts (4th edn., Oxford: Hart Publishing 2002).Google Scholar

Markesinis, Basil et al. Compensation for Personal Injury in English, German and Italian Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005).CrossRef Google Scholar

Maultzsch, Felix, “Der Schutz von Affektionsinteressen bei Leistungsstörungen im englischen und deutschen Recht,” Juristenzeitung (JZ) (2010).CrossRef Google Scholar

Meder, Stephan, Schadensersatz als Enttäuschungsverarbeitung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1989).CrossRef Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan, Überkompensatorische Schmerzensgeldbemessung? (Karlsruhe: Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft 2007).Google Scholar

Palandt, Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (69th edn., Munich: C.H. Beck 2010).Google Scholar

Pflüger, Stephanie, Schmerzensgeld für Angehörige (Bielefeld: Gieseking 2005).Google Scholar

Rogers, W.V. Horton (ed.), Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective (Vienna: Springer 2001).CrossRef Google Scholar

Schiemann, Gottfried, Argumente und Prinzipien bei der Fortbildung des Schadensrechts, vol. 45 (Munich: Münchener Universitätsschriften 1981).Google Scholar

Schmitz, Georg, Ersatz immaterieller Schäden nach Vertragsrecht (Freiberg: Hochschul Verlag 1980).Google Scholar

Schwintowski, Hans-Peter, Sedi, C.S., and Sedi, M.S., “Angehörigenschmerzensgeld – Überwindung eines zivilrechtlichen Dogmas,” Zeitschrift für Schadensrecht (ZfS) (2012).Google Scholar

Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch (Berlin: Sellier–De Gruyter, 2005).Google Scholar

Stoll, Hans, Empfiehlt sich eine Neuregelung der Verpflichtung zum Geldersatz für immateriellen Schaden? Gutachten für den 45. Deutschen Juristentag, in Ständige Deputation des Deutschen Juristentages (eds.), Verhandlungen des Fünfundvierzigsten Deutschen Juristentages, Karlsruhe 1964, vol. I, (Munich: C.H. Beck 1964) III-164.Google Scholar

Stoll, Hans, Haftungsfolgen im bürgerlichen Recht (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller 1993).Google Scholar

Ströfer, Joachim, “Reform des immateriellen Schadensersatzes nach dem BGB?” Juristenzeitung (JZ) (1982).Google Scholar

Ströfer, Joachim, Schadensbegriff und Kommerzialisierung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1982).CrossRef Google Scholar

Thüsing, Gregor, “Schadensersatz für Nichtvermögensschäden bei Vertragsbruch,” Versicherungsrecht (VersR) (2001).Google Scholar

Thüsing, Gregor, Wertende Schadensberechnung (Munich: C.H. Beck 2001).Google Scholar

Wagner, Gerhard, “Das Zweite Schadensersatzrechtsänderungsgesetz,” Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) (2002).Google Scholar

Wagner, Gerhard, “Ersatz immaterieller Schäden: Bestandsaufnahme und europäische Perspektiven,” Juristenzeitung (JZ) (2004).Google Scholar

Wagner, Gerhard, “Neue Perspektiven im Schadensersatzrecht – Kommerzialisierung, Strafschadensersatz, Kollektivschaden, Gutachten A für den 66. Deutschen Juristentag,” in Ständige Deputation des Deutschen Juristentages (ed.), Verhandlungen des Sechsundsechzigsten Deutschen Juristentages Stuttgart 2006, vol. 1 (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2006) A5-A135.Google Scholar

Wendehorst, Christiane, Anspruch und Ausgleich (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1999).Google Scholar

Windscheid, Bernhard, and Kipp, Theodor, Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, vol. 2 (9th edn., Frankfurt.: Literarische Anstalt Rütten & Loening 1906).Google Scholar

Würthwein, Susanne, Schadensersatz für Verlust der Nutzungsmöglichkeit einer Sache oder für entgangene Gebrauchsvorteile? (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2001).Google Scholar

Karakostas, I., and Vassilopoulos, I., Environmental Law in Greece (Hague/Boston: Kluwer/Sakkoulas 1999).Google Scholar

Karakostas, I., Consumer Protection Law (Athens: Nomiki Bibliothiki 2012).Google Scholar

Kerameus, K., and Kozyris, Ph (eds.), Introduction to Greek Law (3rd rev. ed., Athens: Kluwer/Sakkoulas, 2008).Google Scholar

Stathopoulos, M., Contract Law in Greece (2nd rev. ed., Athens: Kluwer/Sakkoulas, 2009).Google Scholar

Karakostas, I., and Vassilopoulos, I., Environmental Law in Greece (Hague/Boston: Kluwer/Sakkoulas 1999).Google Scholar

Karakostas, I., Consumer Protection Law (Athens: Nomiki Bibliothiki 2012).Google Scholar

Kerameus, K., and Kozyris, Ph (eds.), Introduction to Greek Law (3rd rev. ed., Athens: Kluwer/Sakkoulas, 2008).Google Scholar

Stathopoulos, M., Contract Law in Greece (2nd rev. ed., Athens: Kluwer/Sakkoulas, 2009).Google Scholar

Boot, J., “Privaatrecht & Boete,” Ars Aequi (AA) (2008).Google Scholar

Buisen, M. (ed.), Onrechtmatig leven? Opstellen naar aanleiding van Baby Kelly (Nijmegen: Valkhof Pers, 2006).Google Scholar

Engelhard, E.F.D., “(Staats)aansprakelijkheid bij de schending van EVRM-rechten in het ‘grijze’ gebied,” De aangesproken staat (Nijmegen: WLP, 2010).Google Scholar

Kottenhagen, R.J.P., “Medische aansprakelijkheid voor zwangerschap- en geboorteschade,” in Medische aansprakelijkheid (The Hague: Sdu 2009).Google Scholar

Kottenhagen-Edzes, P. (ed.), Immateriële schade: tendensen en wensen (Antwerp: Intersentia 2000).Google Scholar

Lindenbergh,. S. D, Smartengeld (Deventer: Kluwer 1998).Google Scholar

Lindenbergh, S.D., Smartengeld: tien jaar later (Deventer: Kluwer 2008).Google Scholar

Loos, M., Dickie, J., Arnokouros, G., and Wiewiórowska-Domagalska, A., “Compensation for Non-Material Damage under the Directive on Package Travel,” European Review of Private Law (2003) pp 91–103.Google Scholar

Schelhaas, H.N., Het Boetebeding in het Europese Contractenrecht (Deventer: Kluwer 2004).Google Scholar

Stolker, C.J.J.M., “Who’s afraid of wrongful birth?” WPNR (1997).Google Scholar

Verburg, G.J.M., Vaststelling van smartengeld (Deventer: Kluwer 2009).Google Scholar

Verheij, A.J., Vergoeding van immateriële schade wegens aantasting in de persoon (Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri 2002).Google Scholar

Zwitser, R., “Immateriële schadevergoeding bij opzet en daarmee gelijk te stellen bewuste roekeloosheid in het contractenrecht,” RM Themis (2005).Google Scholar

Amato, Cristina, “Il danno non patrimoniale da contratto,” in Ponzanelli, Guido (ed.), Il nuovo danno non patrimoniale (Milan: Giuffré 2004).Google Scholar

Armone, Giovanni M., “La responsabilità dei terzi per la distruzione e/o sottrazione dell’oggetto di affezione,” in Cendon, Paolo (ed.), Il diritto delle relazioni affettiva (Padua: Cedam 2001) p 2261.Google Scholar

von Bar, Christian, and Drobnig, Ulrich (eds.), The Interaction of Contract Law and Tort and Property Law in Europe (Munich: Sellier 2004).Google Scholar

Bona, Marco, “Il danno contrattuale non patrimoniale,” in Monateri, Pier Giuseppe et al (eds.), Il nuovo contratto (Bologna: Zanichelli 2007) p 1211.Google Scholar

Busnelli, Francesco Donato, and Comandé, Giovanni, “Italy,” in Rogers, W.H. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective (The Hague: Kluwer 2001) p 135.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cassano, Giuseppe, La giurisprudenza del danno esistenziale (Padua: Cedam 2002).Google Scholar

Cazzetta, Giovanni, Responsabilità aquiliana e frammentazione del diritto comune civilistico (1865–1914) (Milan: Giuffrè 1991).Google Scholar

Chironi, Giovanni Pietro, “Del danno morale,” Rivista del diritto commerciale e del diritto generale delle obbligazioni (1913) II, p. 805.Google Scholar

Di Marzio, Mauro, “Danno non patrimoniale secondo le Sezioni Unite. Danno non patrimoniale dopo le Sezioni Unite,” in Cendon, Paolo (ed.), Il risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale: Parte generale (Milan: Giuffré 2009) p 509.Google Scholar

Di Marzio, Mauro, “Le funzioni del risarcimento,” in Cendon, Paolo (ed.), La prova e il quantum del risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale (Milan: Giuffré 2009) I, p. 105.Google Scholar

Di Marzio, Mauro, “Gli oggetti d’affezione,” in Cendon, Paolo (ed.), La prova e il quantum nel risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale, vol. 1 (Milan: Giuffré 2008) p 661.Google Scholar

Di Marzio, Mauro, “Il valore esistenziale del denaro,” in Cendon, Paolo (ed.), La prova e il quantum del risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale, vol. 1 (Milan: Giuffré 2009) p 91.Google Scholar

Franzoni, Massimo, Il danno risarcibile (2nd edn., Milan: Giuffré 2010).Google Scholar

Gabba, Carlo Francesco, “Nota a Corte di Cassazione di Palermo,” 23 febbraio 1895, in Foro Italiano (1896), I, c. 700.Google Scholar

Gazzara, Massimo, Il danno non patrimoniale da inadempimento (Naples: ESI 2003).Google Scholar

Giorgi, Giorgio, Teoria delle obbligazioni nel diritto moderno italiano esposta con la scorta della dottrina e della giurisprudenza, vol. 2 (7th edn., Florence: Fratelli Cammelli 1907).Google Scholar

Limpens, Jean, Kruithof, Robert M., and Meinertzhagen-Limpens, Anne, “Liability for One’s Own Act,” Int’l Enc. Comp. L. (Leiden: Brill 1983) vol. 11, part II.Google Scholar

Loschiavo, Salvatore, “Il licenziamento illegittimo,” in Cendon, Paolo (ed.), La prova, il quantum nel risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale (Milan: Giuffré 2009) vol. 1, p 1303.Google Scholar

Marinelli, Fabrizio, “L’animale d’affezione,” in Cendon, Paolo (ed.), Il diritto delle relazioni affettive (Padua: Cedam 2001) III, p 1991.Google Scholar

Markesinis, Basil, Coester, Michael, Alpa, Guido, and Ullstein, Augustus, Compensation for Personal Injury in English, German and Italian Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005).CrossRef Google Scholar

Masoni, Roberto, “Danni e rimedi nella locazione,” in Cendon, Paolo (ed.), Il risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale, Parte speciale (Milan: Giuffré 2009), p 1579.Google Scholar

Mazzola, Marcello Adriano, Immissioni e risarcimento del danno (Padua: Kluwer 2009).Google Scholar

Natullo, Gaetano, “Principi generali della prevenzione e ‘confini’ dell’obbligo di sicurezza,” in Rusciano, Mario and Natullo, Gaetano (eds.), Ambiente e sicurezza del lavoro (Turin: Utet 2007), p 77.Google Scholar

Navarretta, Emanuela, and Bargelli, Elena, “Italy,” in Koziol, Helmut and Steininger, Barbara C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2008 (New York–Vienna, Springer 2009), p 373.Google Scholar

Paladini, Mauro, La responsabilità civile da licenziamento ingiurioso (Padua: Cedam 2000).Google Scholar

Ravazzoni, Alberto, La riparazione del danno non patrimoniale (Milan: 1962).Google Scholar

Ripa, Alessandro, Dirigenti e risoluzione del rapporto (Milan: Ipsoa 2009).Google Scholar

Savorani, Giovanna, “Il danno non patrimoniale da inadempimento,” in Visintini, Giovanna (ed.), Il risarcimento del danno contrattuale: La responsabilità per ritardo e per fatto degli ausiliari (Padua: Cedam 2009), p 251.Google Scholar

Scognamiglio, Claudio, “Il danno patrimoniale: Danno ai beni, perdite e mancati guadagni,” in Visintini, Giovanna (ed.), Trattato della responsabilità contrattuale (Padua: Cedam 2009), III, p 203.Google Scholar

Smorto, Guido, Il danno da inadempimento (Padua: Cedam 2005).Google Scholar

Tatarelli, Maurizio, Il licenziamento individuale e collettivo (3rd edn., Padua: Cedam 2006).Google Scholar

Filar, M., Lekarskie prawo karne, (Kraków 2000).Google Scholar

Justyński, T., Wrongful conception w prawie polskim, “Przegląd Sądowy” 2005, No. 1 p 41.Google Scholar

Kaliński, M., Szkoda na mieniu i jej naprawienie, Warsaw 2008, p 448–49.Google Scholar

Księżak, P., Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, red. M. Pyziak-Szafnicka, Warsaw 2009, p 277.Google Scholar

Nesterowicz, M., Prawo turystyczne [Tourist Act], Edition No. 2, Warsaw 2006, p 98.Google Scholar

Radwański, Z., and Olejniczak, A., Zobowiązania – część ogólna.Google Scholar

Safjan, M., Naprawienie krzywdy niemajątkowej w ramach odpowiedzialności ex contractu, p 271.Google Scholar

Safjan, M., Naprawienie krzywdy niemajątkowej w ramach odpowiedzialności ex contractu, p 272–273, 280.Google Scholar

Safjan, M., Prawo i medycyna, Warsaw 1998, p 38.Google Scholar

Świderska, M., Zgoda pacjenta na zabieg medyczny, Toruń 2007, p 330.Google Scholar

Szpunar, A., Odszkodowanie za szkodę majątkową [Redress for a material damage], Bydgoszcz 1998, p 63.Google Scholar

Szpunar, A., Zadośćuczynienie za szkodę niemajątkową [Redress for Immaterial Damage], p 75.Google Scholar

Wild, M., Roszczenia z tytułu wrongful birth w prawie polskim, “Przegląd Sądowy” 2005, No. 1, p 53.Google Scholar

Zielińska, E., Warunki dopuszczalności zabiegów sterylizacji, “Państwo i Prawo” 1985, No. 9.Google Scholar

Zoll, F., System prawa prywatnego, t. VI, Supplement, Warsaw 2010, p 144.Google Scholar

Alarcão, Rui de, Direito das Obrigações (Coimbra: 1983).Google Scholar

Costa, Mário Almeida, Júlio, Direito das Obrigações (7th edn., 1998).Google Scholar

Leitão, Luís Menezes, Direito das Obrigações, vol. 2 (5th edn., 2007).Google Scholar

Lima, Pires de, and Varela, Antunes, Código Civil Anotado, I, 501–502 e II, 4th edn., 106.Google Scholar

Machado, João Baptista, “Resolução por Incumprimento,” Estudos de Homenagem ao Professor Doutor J.J. Teixeira Ribeiro.Google Scholar

Monteiro, António Pinto, Cláusula Penal e Indemnização (Coimbra: Almedina 1990).Google Scholar

Monteiro, Jorge Sinde, “Reparação dos Danos pessoais em Portugal: A lei e o futuro. Considerações de lege ferende a propósito da discussão da ‘alternativa sueca,’” Colectânea de Jurisprudência 11 (1986) iv.Google Scholar

Pereira, Rui Soares, A Responsabilidade por Danos Patrimoniais do Incumprimento das Obrigações no Direito Civil Português (Coimbra: Coimbra Ed. 2009).Google Scholar

Serra, Adriano Vaz, Anotação ao Acórdão do STJ de 4 de Junho de 1974, 222. Jorge Pessoa, Direito das Obrigações, 1975/1976.Google Scholar

Sousa, Miguel Teixeira, O Concurso de Títulos de Aquisição da Prestação. Estudo sobre a dogmática da pretensão e do concurso de pretensões (Coimbra: Almedina 1988).Google Scholar

Varela, Antunes, Anotação ao Acórdão do STJ de 17 de Junho de 1982, RLJ, 119. Ano (1986–1987).Google Scholar

Veloso, Maria Manuel, A Compensação do Dano Contratual Não patrimonial (em especial no direito de Autor), dissertação de mestrado em Ciências Jurídicas na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra, 1998.Google Scholar

Álvarez Vigaray, Rafael, (1966), “La responsabilidad por daño moral,” Anuario de Derecho Civil, (1966) p 65 et seq.Google Scholar

Carrasco Perera, Ángel (1989), “Comentario al art- 1106 CC,” in García, Manuel Albaladejo, Comentarios al Código Civil y Compilaciones Forales, T. XV., vol. 1, Edersa, (Madrid. 1989)Google Scholar

Cristóbal Montés, Ángel (1990), “El daño moral contractual,” Revista de Derecho Privado, 1990, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar

Díez-Picazo, Luis, Derecho de Daños (Madrid: Civitas 1999).Google Scholar

Díez-Picazo, Luis, El escándalo del daño moral (Madrid: Thomson-Civitas 2008).Google Scholar

Díez-Picazo, Luis, and Ballesteros, Antonio Gullón, Sistema de Derecho Civil, V. II, T.I. (Madrid: Tecnos 2012).Google Scholar

Espiau Espiau, Santiago, “Comentario a la STS de 31 de mayo de 2000,” Cuadernos Civitas de Jurisprudencia Civil (2000) pp 1277–1287.Google Scholar

Espiau Espiau, Santiago, “La indemnización del daño moral en los supuestos de incumplimiento contractual,” Estudios Jurídicos en Homenaje al profesor Luis Díez-Picazo, vol. 2. (Madrid: Civitas 2002).Google Scholar

Fenoy Picón, Nieves, “La Modernización del régimen del incumplimiento del contrato: propuestas de la Comisión General de Codificación, Parte Primera: el incumplimiento,” in Anuario de Derecho Civil (2010) pp. 47–136.Google Scholar

Fenoy Picón, Nieves, “La Modernización del régimen del incumplimiento del contrato: propuestas de la Comisión General de Codificación, Parte Segunda: los remedios por incumplimiento,” in Anuario de Derecho Civil (2011), pp. 1481–1685.Google Scholar

García López, Rafael,, Responsabilidad civil por daño moral: Doctrina y jurisprudencia (Barcelona: Bosch 1990).Google Scholar

García Rubio, María Paz, La responsabilidad contractual de las agencias de viaje (Madrid: Montecorvo: 1999).Google Scholar

Gómez Calle, Esther, El contrato de viaje combinado (Madrid: Civitas 1998).Google Scholar

Gómez Calle, Esther, “Responsabilidad de los organizadores y detallistas,” in Lapuente, Cámara (ed.), Comentarios a las normas de protección de los consumidores (Editorial Constitución y Leyes 2011) pp. 1375–1398.Google Scholar

Gómez Pomar, Fernando, “Daño moral,” InDret 1/2000(2000).Google Scholar

Llamas Pombo, E., Estudios de Derecho de Obligaciones (Wolters Kluwer 2010).Google Scholar

López Fernández, Luis Miguel, “Algunas reflexiones sobre el daño moral contractual: Especial alusión a la venta de viviendas,” in Abril Campoy/ Amat Llari (eds.), Estudios Homenaje al Profesor Lluis Puig Ferriol, vol. 2 (Tirant lo Blanch 2006), pp. 1715–1738.Google Scholar

Martín Casals, Miquel, and Feliú, Josep Solé, “Comentario a la STS de 31 de octubre de 2002,” Cuadernos Civitas de Jurisprudencia Civil, No. 61 (Jan.–Apr. 2003), p 245 et seq.Google Scholar

Morales Moreno, Antonio Manuel, Incumplimiento del contrato y lucro cesante, (Madrid: Thomson-Civitas 2010).Google Scholar

Nieto Alonso, Antonia, “Daños morales derivados del incumplimiento o defectuoso cumplimiento de una obligación contractual (A propósito de alguna jurisprudencia reciente),” Anuario de Derecho Civil (2006), p 1115–1197.Google Scholar

Fernando, Pantaleón Prieto, “Del concepto de daño hacia una teoría general del derecho de daños” (doctoral thesis, Univ. Autonoma de Madrid, 1983).Google Scholar

Pantaleón Prieto, Fernando, “El sistema de responsabilidad contractual (Materiales para un debate),” Anuario de Derecho Civil (1991) pp 1019–1091.Google Scholar

Pérez Ontiveros Baquero, Carmen, Daño moral por incumplimiento de contrato (Madrid: Thomson-Civitas 2006).Google Scholar

Rodríguez Guitián, Alma María, “Indemnización del daño moral derivado del incumplimiento contractual (A propósito de la sentencia del Tribunal Supremo de 31 de octubre de 2002),” Anuario de Derecho Civil (2003), pp 829–848.Google Scholar

Rodríguez Guitián, Alma María, “Indemnización del daño moral contractual: Comentario a la STS de 28 de marzo de 2005,” Revista de Derecho Patrimonial, No. 16 (2006) pp 277–285.Google Scholar

Rodríguez Guitián, Alma María, “La indemnización del daño moral en el incumplimiento contractual,” Revista Jurídica de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (2007), pp. 239–266.Google Scholar

Solé Feliú, Josep, “El daño moral por infracción contractual: principios, modelos y derecho español,” InDret (2009).Google Scholar

Vicente Domingo, Elena, “El daño,” in Campos, L.F. Reglero (ed.), Tratado de Responsabilidad civil (Aranzadi 2008).Google Scholar

Andersson, H., Gränsproblem i skadeståndsrätten: Skadeståndsrättsliga utvecklingslinjer, bok II (Uppsala: Iustus 2013).Google Scholar

Andersson, H., “Ekonomisk-ideell skada,” in Holgersen, , et al. (eds.), Festskrift till Nils Nygaard på 70-årsdagen 3, April 2002 (Bergen: Fagbokforlaget 2002) p. 7 et seq.Google Scholar

Andersson, H., Skyddsändamål och adekvans: Om skadeståndsansvarets gränser (Uppsala: Iustus 1993).Google Scholar

Andersson, H., Trepartsrelationer i skadeståndsrätten (Uppsala: Iustus 1997).Google Scholar

Asp, P., Ulväng, U., and Jareborg, N., Kriminalrättens grunder (Uppsala: Iustus 2011).Google Scholar

Bengtsson, B., Försäkringsavtalsrätt (Stockholm: Norstedts 2006).Google Scholar

Björkdahl, E. P., Hyra av bostad och lokal (Uppsala: Iustus 2013).Google Scholar

Flodin, J., “Ersättning för s.k. chockskada,” Svensk Juristtidning (2008) p. 525 et seq.Google Scholar

Friberg, S., Kränkningsersättning: Skadestånd för kränkning genom brott (Uppsala: Iustus 2010).Google Scholar

Hansson, M., Kollektivavtalsrätten: En rättsvetenskaplig berättelse (Uppsala: Iustus 2010).Google Scholar

Hellner, J., “Scandinavian Legal Realism in the Law of Contract,” in Cane, P. and Stapleton, J. (eds.), Essays for Patrick Atiyah (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1991) p. 53 et seq.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hellner, J., Hager, R., and Persson, A. H., Speciell avtalsrätt II, Kontraktsrätt, 1 hft, Särskilda avtal, 5 uppl. (Stockholm: Norstedts 2010).Google Scholar

Hellner, J., Hager, R., and Persson, A. H., Speciell avtalsrätt II, Kontraktsrätt, 2 hft, Allmänna ämnen, 5 uppl. (Stockholm: Norstedts 2011).Google Scholar

Hellner, J., and Radetzki, M., Skadeståndsrätt, 8 uppl. (Stockholm: Norstedts 2010).Google Scholar

Herre, J., Konsumentköplagen: En kommentar, 2 uppl. (Stockholm: Norstedts 2004).Google Scholar

Håstad, T., Köprätt och annan kontraktsrätt, 6 uppl. (Uppsala: Iustus 2009).Google Scholar

Jareborg, N., Friberg, S., Brotten mot person och förmögenhetsbrotten (Uppsala: Iustus 2011).Google Scholar

Källström, K., and Malmberg, J., Anställningsförhållandet: Inledning till den individuella arbetsrätten, 2 uppl. (Uppsala: Iustus 2009).Google Scholar

Munukka, J., Kontraktuell lojalitetsplikt (Stockholm: Jure 2007).Google Scholar

Ramberg, J., and Herre, J., Allmän köprätt, 5 uppl. (Stockholm: Norstedts 2009).Google Scholar

Rodhe, K., Obligationsrätt (Stockholm: 1956).Google Scholar

Schmidt, F., Facklig arbetsrätt. Reviderad upplaga ombesörjd av Eklund, R., Göransson, H., Källström, K. och Sigeman, T. (Stockholm: Juristforlaget 1997).Google Scholar

Schultz, M., Kränkning: Studier i skadeståndsrättslig argumentation (Stockholm: Jure 2008).Google Scholar

Strömbäck, E., Ideell skada: Essays on Tort, Insurance, Law and Society in Honour of Bill W. Dufwa (Stockholm: Jure 2006) pp 1091 et seq.Google Scholar

Wilhelmsson, T, Senmodern ansvarsrätt: Privaträtt som redskap för mikropolitik (Uppsala: Iustus 2001).Google Scholar