Mode conversion and tunneling

E. R. Tracy; A. J. Brizard; A. S. Richardson; A. N. Kaufman

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511667565.007

6 - Mode conversion and tunneling

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2014

A. S. Richardson and

E. R. Tracy: Affiliation:
College of William and Mary, Virginia
A. J. Brizard: Affiliation:
Saint Michael's College, Vermont
A. S. Richardson: Affiliation:
US Naval Research Laboratory (NRL)
A. N. Kaufman: Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

As already mentioned in earlier chapters, the eikonal approximation can become invalid in local regions of the plasma. The most common problems are caustics (see Chapter 5), tunneling, and mode conversion. Both tunneling and mode conversion are processes where one incoming ray splits into two outgoing rays, a transmitted ray and a converted ray. The matched asymptotic methods are therefore more complicated than for caustics. Tunneling concerns only one eigenvalue of the N × N dispersion matrix, while mode conversion entails two. It follows that tunneling involves only one polarization, while mode conversion is associated with a pair. Therefore, tunneling can be reduced by Galerkin projection locally to a scalar formulation, while mode conversion is inherently a vector problem. An important point we should emphasize is the following: For caustics, it is always possible to find a local representation where the eikonal approximation is valid. In contrast, in tunneling and mode conversion regions, there is no representation in which the eikonal approximation is valid. It is only when we consider points far from the conversion region that we recover eikonal behavior. This leads to two important questions:

If the eikonal approximation is not valid within the conversion region, why persist in using ray tracing there?
Although the eikonal approximation is valid for the incoming wave field (by assumption), what justifies the assumption that the transmitted and converted wave fields become eikonal once more?

Type: Chapter
Information: Ray Tracing and Beyond
Phase Space Methods in Plasma Wave Theory
, pp. 228 - 326

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667565.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[BD93] PJ, Braam and JJ, Duistermaat. Normal forms of real symmetric systems with multiplicity. Indagationes Mathematicae, 4(4):407–421, 1993.Google Scholar

[BD95] PJ, Braam and JJ, Duistermaat. Normal Forms of Real Symmetric Systems with Multiplicity, volume 34 of Banach Center Publications. Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warzawa, 1995. Translated by HP Robertson.

[BF83] IB, Bernstein and L, Friedland. Geometric optics in space and time varying plasmas. In Handbook of Plasma Physics, Volume 1: Basic Plasma Physics, chapter 2, pages 367–418. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.

[BK96] AJ, Brizard and AN, Kaufman. How a wave flips its energy sign by linear conversion. Physical Review Letters, 76(10):1639–1642, 1996.Google Scholar

[BMKT98] AJ, Brizard, JJ, Morehead, AN, Kaufman, and ER, Tracy. Double-crossing mode conversion in nonuniform media. Physics of Plasmas, 5(1):45–59, 1998.Google Scholar

[BP99] S, Bernabel and F, Paoletti, editors. RF Power in Plasmas, 13th Topical Conference, number 485 in AIP Conference Proceedings, New York, 1999. American Institute of Physics.

[Bud85] KG, Budden. The Propagation of Radio Waves: The Theory ofRadio Waves of Low Power in the Ionosphere and Magnetosphere. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1985.

[Cal06] PS, Cally. Dispersion relations, rays and ray splitting in magnetohelioseis-mology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 364(1839):333–349, 2006.Google Scholar

[CdV03] Y Colin, de Verdière. The level crossing problem in semi-classical analysis: the symmetric case. In Annales de l'Institute Fourier, Special Issue: Proceedings of Fréderic Pham's Congress, 53(4): 1023–1054, 2003.Google Scholar

[CdV04] Y Colin, de Verdière. The level crossing problem in semi-classical analysis. ii. the Hermitian case (Le problème des croisements des valeurs propres en analyse semi-classique. ii: le cas Hermitien). In Annales de l'Institute Fourier, Special Issue: In Honor of Louis Boutet de Monvel, 54(5): 1423–1441, 2004.Google Scholar

[CH11] PS, Cally and SC, Hansen. Benchmarking fast-to-Alfven mode conversion in a cold MHD plasma. The Astrophysical Journal, 738(2), 2011.Google Scholar

[CLD83] RA, Cairns and CN, Lashmore-Davies. A unified theory of a class of mode conversion problems. Physics of Fluids, 26(5):1268–1274, 1983.Google Scholar

[CS79] MA, Cane and ES, Sarachik. Forced baroclinic ocean motions. III. The linear equatorial basin case. Journal of Marine Research, 37:355–398, 1979.Google Scholar

[DGM73] JD, Doll, TF, George, and WH, Miller. Complex-valued classical trajectories for reactive tunneling in three-dimensional collisions of H and H2. Journal of Chemical Physics, 58(4):1343–1351, 1973.Google Scholar

[DT72] JB, Delos and WR, Thorson. Semiclassical theory of inelastic collisions. II. Momentum space formulation. Physical Review A, 6(2):720–727, 1972.Google Scholar

[DTK72] JB, Delos, WR, Thorson, and SK, Knudson. Semiclassical theory of inelastic collisions. I. Classical picture and semiclassical formulation. Physical Review A, 6(2):709–720, 1972.Google Scholar

[ER98] C, Emmrich and H, Romer. Multicomponent Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin approximation on arbitrary symplectic manifolds: a star product approach. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 39(7):3530–3546, 1998.Google Scholar

[EW96] C, Emmrich and A, Weinstein. Geometry of the transport equation in multicomponent WKB approximations. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 176(3):701–711, 1996.Google Scholar

[FK87] L, Friedland and AN, Kaufman. Congruent reduction in geometric optics and mode conversion. Physics of Fluids, 30(10):3050–3058, 1987.Google Scholar

[FKB81] V, Fuchs, K, Ko, and A, Bers. Theory of mode-conversion in weakly inhomogeneous plasma. Physics of Fluids, 24(7):1251–1261, 1981.Google Scholar

[FL94] WG, Flynn and RG, Littlejohn. Normal forms for linear mode conversion and Landau-Zener transitions in one dimension. Annals of Physics, 234(2):334–403, 1994.Google Scholar

[Fri85] L, Friedland. Renormalized geometric optics description of mode conversion in weakly inhomogeneous plasmas. Physics of Fluids, 28(11):3260–3268, 1985.Google Scholar

[GM72] TF, George and WH, Miller. Classical S-matrix theory of reactive tunneling: linear H + H2 collisions. Journal of Chemical Physics, 57(6):2458–2467, 1972.Google Scholar

[HC09] SC, Hansen and PS, Cally. An exact test of generalised ray theory in local helioseismology. Solar Physics, 255(2):193–202, 2009.Google Scholar

[HC12] SC, Hansen and PS, Cally. Benchmarking fast-to-Alfven mode conversion in a cold MHD plasma. II. How to get Alfven waves through the solar transition region. The Astrophysical Journal, 751(1), 2012.Google Scholar

[JAVV95] A, Jaun, K, Appert, J, Vaclavik, and L, Villard. Global waves in resistive and hot tokamak plasmas. Computer Physics Communications, 92(2-3):153–187, 1995.Google Scholar

[JTK07] A, Jaun, ER, Tracy, and AN, Kaufman. Eikonal waves, caustics and mode conversion in tokamak plasmas. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 49(1):43–67, 2007.Google Scholar

[KG03] CF, Kammerer and P, Gerard. A Landau-Zener formula for non-degenerated involutive codimension 3 crossings. Annales Henri Poincare, 4(3):513–552, 2003.Google Scholar

[KMBT99] AN, Kaufman, JJ, Morehead, AJ, Brizard, and ER, Tracy. Mode conversion in the Gulf of Guinea. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 394:175–192, 1999.Google Scholar

[KT98] Yu, Krasniak and ER, Tracy. Emission from within mode conversion regions in multi-dimensions: a new diagnostic probe for non-uniform media. Physics Letters A, 248(2-4):235–241, 1998.Google Scholar

[KT99] Yu, Krasniak and ER, Tracy. Emission from mode conversion regions. In S, Bernabel and F, Paoletti, editors, The Thirteenth Topical Conference on Radio Frequency Power in Plasmas, number 485 in AIP Conference Proceedings, pages 387–390, New York, 1999.

[KTMB99] AN, Kaufman, ER, Tracy, JJ, Morehead, and AJ, Brizard. The dissipative Budden problem: effect of converted-wave damping on primary-wave reflection. Physics Letters A, 252(1-2):43–48, 1999.Google Scholar

[LF91] RG, Littlejohn and WG, Flynn. Geometric phases in the asymptotic theory of coupled wave equations. Physical Review A, 44(8):5239–5256, October 1991.Google Scholar

[Lig58] MJ, Lighthill. Introduction to Fourier Analysis and Generalised Functions. Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics and Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1958.

[Lit93] RG, Littlejohn. Landau-Zener transitions in two dimensions. In H, Grabert, editor, Path Integrals from meVto MeV, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, Tutzing, Bavaria, May 18-21,1992, Singapore, 1993. World Scientific.

[LMC+94] YM, Liang, JJ, Morehead, DR, Cook, T, Fla, and AN, Kaufman. Multiple mode conversion: an analytical and numerical comparison. Physics Letters A, 193(1):82–88, 1994.Google Scholar

[McD88] SW, McDonald. Phase-space representations of wave equations with applications to the eikonal approximation for short-wavelength waves. Physics Reports, 158(6):337–416, 1988.Google Scholar

[Mil70a] WH, Miller. Classical S-matrix: numerical application to inelastic collisions. Journal of Chemical Physics, 53(9):3578–3787, 1970.Google Scholar

[Mil70b] WH, Miller. Semiclassical theory of atom-diatom collisions: path integrals and the classical S-matrix. Journal of Chemical Physics, 53(5):1949–1959, 1970.Google Scholar

[NMS06] N, Nassiri-Mofakham and BS, Sabzevari. Mode conversion in plasmas with two-dimensional inhomogeneities. Journal of Plasma Physics, 72(01):71–83, 2006.Google Scholar

[NU84] EE, Nikitin and S Ya, Umanskii. Theory of Slow Atomic Collisons, volume 30 of Springer Series in Chemical Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.

[OLBC10] FW, Olver, DW, Lozier, RF, Boisvert, and CW, Clark. NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010.

[Raf96] GG, Raffelt. Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics, chapter 8. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 1996.

[RBSF96] AK, Ram, A, Bers, SD, Schultz, and V, Fuchs. Mode conversion of fast Alfven waves at the ion-ion hybrid resonance. Physics of Plasmas, 3(5):1976–1982, 1996.Google Scholar

[RT08] AS, Richardson and ER, Tracy. Quadratic corrections to the metaplectic formulation of resonant mode conversion. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41(37):375501 (30pp), 2008.Google Scholar

[Sti92] TH, Stix. Waves in Plasmas. American Institute of Physics, New York, 1992.

[Swa98] DG, Swanson. Theory of Mode Conversion and Tunneling. Wiley, New York, 1998.

[Tak96] S, Takada. Multidimensional tunneling in terms of complex classical mechanics: wave functions, energy splittings, and decay rates in nonintegrable systems. Journal of Chemical Physics, 104(10):3742–3759, 1996.Google Scholar

[TBJ+12] ER, Tracy, AJ, Brizard, D, Johnston, AN, Kaufman, AS, Richardson, and N, Zobin. Rooms with a view: a novel approach to iterated multidimensional wave conversion. Communication in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 17(5):2161–2170, 2012.Google Scholar

[TK90] ER, Tracy and AN, Kaufman. Wave-kinetic formulation of incoherent linear mode conversion. Physical Review Letters, 64(14):1621–1624, April 1990.Google Scholar

[TK93] ER, Tracy and AN, Kaufman. Metaplectic formulation of linear mode conversion. Physical Review E, 48(3):2196–2211, September 1993.Google Scholar

[TK03] ER, Tracy and AN, Kaufman. Ray helicity: geometric invariant for multidimensional resonant wave conversion. Physical Review Letters, 91(13): 130402, Sepember 2003.Google Scholar

[TKJ07] ER, Tracy, AN, Kaufman, and A, Jaun. Local fields for asymptotic matching in multidimensional mode conversion. Physics of Plasmas, 14(8):082102, 2007.Google Scholar

[TKL95] ER, Tracy, AN Kaufman, and YM Liang. Wave emission by resonance crossing. Physics of Plasmas, 2(12):4413–4419, 1995.Google Scholar

[TM01] R, Tailleux and JC, McWilliams. Linear resonance, WKB breakdown, and the coupling of Rossby waves over slowly varying topography. In PF, Hod-nett, editor, IUTAM Symposium on Advances in Mathematical Modelling of Atmosphere and Ocean Dynamics, volume 61 of Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications, pages 259–264. Springer, Netherlands, 2001.

[TM02] R, Tailleux and JC, McWilliams. Energy propagation of long extratropical Rossby waves over slowly varying zonal topography. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 473:295–319, 2002.Google Scholar

[TN94] S, Takada and H, Nakamura. Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin theory of multidimensional tunneling: general theory for energy splitting. Journal of Chemical Physics, 100(1):98–113, 1994.Google Scholar

[Xia10] Y, Xiao. Comparison of full-wave and ray-tracing analysis of mode conversion in plasmas. Ph.D. thesis, The College of William and Mary, 2010.

Book contents

6 - Mode conversion and tunneling

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive