Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:51:55.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, E. W. & Rosenkrantz, R. D. (1980). Applying the Jeffrey decision model to rational betting and information acquisition. Theory and Decision, 12, 1–20.Google Scholar
Alexander, H. G. (1958). The paradoxes of confirmation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 9, 227–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l'école americaine. Econometrica, 21, 503–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Hillel, M. (1973). On the subjective probability of compound events. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 396–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Hillel, M. & Margalit, A. (1972). Newcomb's paradox revisited. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 23, 295–304.Google Scholar
Becker, G. M. & McClintock, C. G. (1967). Value: behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 18, 239–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. (1966). Notes on the “paradoxes of confirmation”n Aspects of Inductive Logic, ed. Hintikka, J. and Suppes, P., pp. 175–97. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Bogdan, R. J. (1976) (ed.). Local Induction. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Bolker, E. D. (1967). A simultaneous axiomatization of utility and subjective probability. Philosophy of Science, 34, 333–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borch, K. (1968). The Allais paradox: a comment. Behavioral Science, 13, 488–9.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, R. B. (1933). The nature of believing. In Knowledge and Belief, ed. Griffiths, A. P., pp. 28–40. (1973). London: Oxford University Press.
Braithwaite, R. B. (1953). Scientific Explanation. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Brown, P. M. (1976). Conditionalization and expected utility. Philosophy of Science, 43, 415–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950). Logical Foundations of Probability, (1962). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cartwright, N. (1979). Causal laws and effective strategies. Nous, 13, 419–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chihara, C. (1981). Quine and the confirmational paradoxes. In Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6: Foundations of Analytic Philosophy, ed. French, P., Wettstein, H. & Uehling, T., pp. 425–52. University of Minnesota Press.
Churchman, C. W. (1948). Theory of Experimental Inference. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Churchman, C. W. (1956). Science and decision making. Philosophy of Science, 23, 247–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. J. (1981). Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 317–31.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H., Bezembinder, T. G. & Goode, F. M. (1967). Testing expectation theories of decision making without measuring utility or subjective probability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4, 72–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFinetti, B. (1937). Foresight: its logical laws, its subjective sources. Trans. Kyburg, H. E. in Studies in Subjective Probability, ed. Kyburg, H. E. & Smokler, H. E., pp. 93–158. (1964). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
DeFinetti, B. (1970). Theory of Probability: A Critical Introductory Treatment, trans. Machí, A. & Smith, A., vol. 1. (1973). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Domotor, Z. (1978). Axiomatization of Jeffrey utilities. Synthese, 39, 165–210.Google Scholar
Dorling, J. (1979). Bayesian personalism, the methodology of scientific research programmes, and Duhem's problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 10, 177–87.Google Scholar
Edwards, W. (1961). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 12, 473–98.Google Scholar
Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fellner, W. (1961). Distortion of subjective probabilities as a reaction to uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 670–89.Google Scholar
Gibbard, A. & Harper, W. L. (1978). Counterfactuals and two kinds of expected utility. In Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory, ed. Hooker, C. A., Leach, J. J. & McClennen, E. F., vol. 1, pp. 125–62. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Glymour, C. (1980). Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Good, I. J. (1967). The white shoe is a red herring. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 17, 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, Fiction and Forecast, (1973). Indianapolis: The Bobbs–Merrill Company, Inc.
Hacking, I. (1967). Slightly more realistic personal probability. Philosophy of Science, 34, 311–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1945). Studies in the logic of confirmation. In his Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 3–46. (1965). New York: The Free Press.
Hempel, C. G. (1960). Inductive inconsistencies. In his Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 53–79. (1965). New York: The Free Press.
Hesse, M. (1974). The Structure of Scientific Inference. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hosiasson-Lindenbaum, J. (1940). On confirmation. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5, 133–48.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. & Pargetter, R. (1976). A modified Dutch book argument. Philosophical Studies, 29, 403–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamison, D. (1970). Bayesian information usage. In Information and Inference, ed. Hintikka, J. & Suppes, P., pp. 28–57. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRef
Jaynes, E. T. (1958). Probability Theory in Science and Engineering, Colloquium Lectures in Pure and Applied Science, no. 4, Field Research Laboratory, Socony Mobil Oil, Dallas. (Lecture 5, The A p distribution, pp. 152–87.)
Jeffrey, R. C. (1956). Valuation and acceptance of scientific hypotheses. Philosophy of Science, 23, 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, R. C. (1965 a). Ethics and the logic of decision. The Journal of Philosophy, 62, 528–39.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. C. (1965 b). The Logic of Decision. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Jeffrey, R. C. (1974). Preferences among preferences. The Journal of Philosophy, 71, 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, R. C. (1977). Savage's omelet. In PSA 1976, ed. Suppe, F. & Asquith, P. D., vol. 2, pp. 361–71. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.
Jeffrey, R. C. (1978). Axiomatizing the logic of decision. In Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory, vol. 1, ed. Hooker, C. A., Leach, J. J. and McClennen, E. F., pp. 227–31. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Jeffrey, R. C. (198l a). Choice, chance and credence. In Philosophy of Language/Philosophical Logic, ed. von Wright, G. H. & Fløustad, F., pp. 367–86. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Jeffrey, R. C. (1981 b). The logic of decision defended. Synthese, 48, 473–92.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–54.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction, The Psychological Review, 80, 237–51.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R. & Chihara, C. (1979). The Dutch book argument: its logical flaws, its subjective sources. Philosophical Studies, 36, 19–33.Google Scholar
Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P. & Tversky, A. (197l). Foundations of Measurement, vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.
Kyburg, H. (1978). Subjective probability: criticisms, reflections, and problems. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 7, 157–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1765). New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, trans. Langley, A. G., (1949). La Salle, Illinois: The Open Court Publishing Company.
Levi, I. (1961). Decision theory and confirmation. The Journal of Philosophy, 58, 614–25.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1979). Prisoners’ Dilemma is a Newcomb problem. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 8, 235–40.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1981). Causal decision theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59, 5–30.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. & Krantz, D. H. (1971). Conditional expected utility. Econometrica, 39, 253–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCrimmon, K. R. (1968). Descriptive and normative implications of the decision-theory postulates. In Risk and Uncertainty, ed. Borch, K. & Mossin, J., pp. 3–23. New York: Saint Martin's Press.CrossRef
Mackie, J. L. (1963). The paradox of confirmation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 13, 265–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, D. H. (1971). The Matter of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mellor, D. H. (1978). Conscious belief. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 78, 87–101.Google Scholar
Mellor, D. H. (1980). Consciousness and degrees of belief. In Prospects for Pragmatism: Essays in Honor of F. P. Ramsey, ed. Mellor, D. H., pp. 139–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, D. (1966). A paradox of information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 17, 59–61.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. G. (1967). On the consistency of preferences in Allais’ paradox. Behavioral Science, 12, 373–83.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1969). Newcomb's problem and two principles of choice. In Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, ed. Rescher, N., et al, pp. 114–46. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRef
Pears, D. (1950). Hypotheticals. Analysis, 10, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfanzagl, J. (1968). Theory of Measurement. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Quine, W. V. (1969). Natural kinds. In his Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, pp. 114–38. New York: Columbia University Press.
Raiffa, H. (1961). Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms: comment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 690–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1926). Truth and probability. In his The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, ed. Braithwaite, R. B., pp. 156–98. (1931). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Republished in his Foundations, ed. D. H. Mellor, pp. 58–100. (1978). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Also in Studies in Subjective Probability, ed. H. E. Kyburg & H. E. Smokler, pp. 61–92. (1964). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Rapoport, A. & Wallsten, T. S. (1972). Individual decision behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 23, 131–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rosenkrantz, R. D. (1976). Simplicity. In Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, ed. Harper, W. L. & Hooker, C. A., vol. 1, pp. 167–203. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Rudner, R. (1953). The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments. Philosophy of Science, 20, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics, 1972. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
Savage, L. J. (1967). Difficulties in the theory of personal probability. Philosophy of Science, 34, 305–10.Google Scholar
Scheffler, I. (1963). The Anatomy of Inquiry. Indianapolis: The Bobbs–Merrill Company, Inc.
Schlesinger, G. (1974). The unpredictability of free choices. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25, 209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1980 a). Causal Necessity: A Pragmatic Investigation of the Necessity of Laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Skyrms, B. (1980 b). Higher order degrees of belief. In Prospects for Pragmatism: Essays in Honor of F. P. Ramsey, ed. Mellor, D. H., pp. 109–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P. & Lichtenstein, S. (1971). Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 649–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. (1974). Who accepts Savage's axiom? Behavioral Science, 19, 368–73.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. (1956). The role of subjective probability and utility in decision-making. In Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 5, ed. Neyman, J., pp. 61–73. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Suppes, P. (1960). Some open problems in the foundations of subjective probability. In Information and Decision Processes, ed. Machol, R. E., pp. 162–9. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Suppes, P. (1961). The philosophical relevance of decision theory. The Journal of Philosophy, 58, 605–14.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. (1966). A Bayesian approach to the paradoxes of confirmation. In Aspects of Inductive Logic, ed. Hintikka, J. & Suppes, P., pp. 198–207. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.CrossRef
Swinburne, R. (1973). An Introduction to Confirmation Theory. London: Methuen.
Teller, P. (1976). Conditionalization, observation and change of preference. In Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, vol. 1, ed. Harper, W. L. and Hooker, C. A., 205–59. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRef
Tversky, A. (1967 a). Additivity, utility and subjective probability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4, 75–201.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1967 b). Utility theory and additivity analysis of risky choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 27–36.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. The Psychological Review, 76, 31–48.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Ellery Eells
  • Book: Rational Decision and Causality
  • Online publication: 05 July 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316534823.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Ellery Eells
  • Book: Rational Decision and Causality
  • Online publication: 05 July 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316534823.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Ellery Eells
  • Book: Rational Decision and Causality
  • Online publication: 05 July 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316534823.014
Available formats
×