Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-09T02:46:51.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Decay scattering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

William C. Schieve  and
Lawrence P. Horwitz
William C. Schieve
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Lawrence P. Horwitz
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
Get access

Summary

Basic notions and theWigner–Weisskopf theory

Although the notions of bound states, scattering and quantum transitions are well defined in the quantum theory, the description of an unstable system, involved in the process of decay, has remained an outstanding issue for many years. The problem is fundamental, since it concerns the nature of irreversible processes, one of the most important issues in statistical mechanics and the theme that is central to this book.

The theory of decay is intimately connected with scattering theory and necessarily contains mathematical ideas and methods. We shall try to explain these points carefully as we get to them.

We treat elsewhere in the book the ideas of Boltzmann, Van Hove and Prigogine on irreversible phenomena. The tools that are developed there are basically approximate, although very useful. One can argue that the basic rigorous characteristic of an irreversible process is that, as represented in terms of the evolution of a state in the Hilbert space of the quantum theory, it must be a semigroup. This type of evolution, resulting in an operation Z(t) on a state ψ, should satisfy the property

Z(t2) Z(t1) = Z(t1 + t2). (17.1)

The argument is as follows. If the system evolves in time t1 and is stopped, then evolves further at time t2, since the process has no memory, the total evolution should be as if the system evolved from the initial state to a state at t1 + t2 independently of the fact that it was done in two stages (Piron, 1976). Since the process is irreversible, the operator Z(t) may have no inverse. Such an evolution is called a semigroup. As we shall see, it is not possible to obtain such an evolution law in the framework of the standard quantum theory (Horwitz et al., 1971), but recently much work has been done, and methods have been developed, based on ideas of Sz.-Nagy and Foias (1976), such as the theory of Lax and Phillips (1967) and its extension to the quantum theory (Strauss et al., 2000) in which semigroup evolution can be achieved.

Type
Chapter
Information
Quantum Statistical Mechanics , pp. 303 - 364
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agam, O., Altshuler, B.L. and Andreev, A.V. (1995). Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4389.CrossRef
Agam, O., Wingreen, N.S., Altshuler, B.L., Ralph, D.C. and Tinkham, M. (1996). Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1996.
Aguilar, E.J. and Combes, J.M. (1971). Comm. Math. Phys. 22, 269.CrossRef
Aharonov, Y. and Vardi, M. (1980). Phys. Rev. 21, 2235.CrossRef
Antoniou, I., Levitan, J. and Horwitz, L.P. (1993). J. Phys. A Math Gen. 26, 6033.CrossRef
Bailey, T. and Schieve, W.C. (1978). Nuovo Cim. 47A, 231.CrossRef
Balslev, E. and Combes J., M. (1971). Comm. Math. Phys. 22, 280.CrossRef
Baumgartel, H. (1978). Math. Nachr. 75, 133.CrossRef
Baumgartel, H. (2006). Rev. Math. Phys. 18, 611.CrossRef
Ben-Ari, T. and Horwitz, L.P. (2004). Phys. Lett. A 332, 168.CrossRef
Bleistein, N., Handelsman, R., Horwitz, L.P. and Neumann, H. (1977). Nuovo Cim. 41A, 389.CrossRef
Bohm, A. (1978). The Rigged Hilbert Space and Quantum Mechanics, ?Springer Lecture Notes on Physics 78 (Berlin, Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, A. (1980). J. Math. Phys. 21, 1040.CrossRef
Bohm, A. (1981). J. Math. Phys. 21, 2813.CrossRef
Bohm, A. and Gadella, M. (1989). Dirac Kets, Gamow Vectors and Gel'fand Triplets, Lecture Notes in Physics 348 (Berlin, Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, A. and Kaldass, H. (2000). In Mathematical Physics and Stochastic Analysis, pp. 99–113 (RiverEdge, N.J, World Scientific).Google Scholar
Bohm, A., Gadella, M. and Mainland, G.B. (1989). Am. J. Phys. 57, 1103.CrossRef
Cahn, E.N. and Goldhaber, G. (1989). The Experimental Foundations of Particle Physics, p. 193ff. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Charpak, G. and Gourdin, M. (1967). CERN Report 67–181, (Geneva, CERN).
Christenson, J.H., Cronin, J.W., Fitch, V.L. and Turlay, R. (1964). Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 138.CrossRef
Cohen, E. and Horwitz, L.P. (2001). Hadron. J. 24, 593. Estimates based on Particle Physics Booklet; see Hagiwara, K. (2002).
Cornfeld, I.P., Formin, S.V. and Sinai, Ya. G. (1982). Ergodic Theory (Berlin, Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirac, P.A.M. (1947). Quantum Mechanics (London, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Eisenberg, E. and Horwitz, L.P. (1997). In Advances in Chemical Physics, ed. I., Prigogine and S., Rice (New York, Wiley).Google Scholar
Fanchi, R. (1979). Phys. Rev. D 20, 3108.CrossRef
Feynman, R.P. (1948). Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 367.CrossRef
Feynman, R.P. (1950). Phys. Rev. 80, 440.CrossRef
Fischer, M.C., Gutiérrez-Medina, B. and Raizen, M.G. (2001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 040402.CrossRef
Flesia, C. and Piron, C. (1984). Helv. Phys. Acta 57, 697.
Friedrichs, K.O. (1950). Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 1, 361.CrossRef
Friedrichs, K.O. and Rejto, P. (1962). Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 15, 219.CrossRef
Gamow, G. (1928). Z. Phys. 51, 204.CrossRef
Gel'fand, I.M. and Shilov, G.E. (1967). Generalized Functions II (New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, M. and Ne'eman, Y. (1964). The Eightfold Way (New York, W.A. Benjamin).Google Scholar
Giuliani, D., Joos, E., Kiefer, C., Kupsch, J., Stamatescu, I.-O., Zeh, H.D. (1996), Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (New York, Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagiwara, K. et al. (2002). Phys. Rev. D 66, 010001.CrossRef
Höhler, G. (1958). Z. Phys. 152, 546.CrossRef
Horwitz, L.P. and Marchand, J.P. (1969). Helv. Phys. Acta 42, 1039.
Horwitz, L.P. and Mizrachi, L. (1974). Nuovo Cim. 21A, 625.CrossRef
Horwitz, L.P. and Piron, C. (1973). Helv. Phys. Acta 46, 316.
Horwitz, L.P. and Piron, C. (1993). Helv. Phys. Acta 66, 694.
Horwitz, L.P. and Sigal, I.M. (1980). Helv. Phys. Acta 51, 685.
Horwitz, L.P., Marchand, J.P. and La Vita, J. (1971). J. Math. Phys. 12, 2537.CrossRef
Horwitz, L.P., Schieve, W.C. and Piron, C. (1981). Ann. Phys. 137, 306.CrossRef
Howland, J.S. (1974). Math. Ann. 207, 315.CrossRef
Howland, J.S. (1979). Springer Lecture Notes in Physics 130, 163.CrossRef
Itano, N.M., Heinzen, D.J., Bollinger, J.J. and Wineland, D.J. (1990). Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295.CrossRef
Jauch, J.M. (1958). Helv. Phys. Acta 31, 127, 661.
Joos, E. (1996). In Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory, p. 96ff, ed. D., Giulini, E., Joos, C., Kieffer, J., Kupsch, I.O., Stamatescu and H.D., Zeh (New York, Springer). This book contains useful discussions and references on a wide range of subjects associated with the formulation of decoherence.Google Scholar
Kato, T. (1966). Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators (New York, Springer).Google Scholar
Kyprionides, A. (1986). Phys. Rep. 155, 1, and references therein.CrossRef
Lax, P.D. and Phillips, R.S. (1967). Scattering Theory (New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar
Lee, T.D. (1954). Phys. Rev. 95, 1329.CrossRef
Lee, T.D., Oehme, R. and Yang, C.N. (1957). Phys. Rev. 106, 340.CrossRef
Martin, B.R. and Shaw, G. (1997). Particle Physics, pp. 248ff. (Chichester, Wiley).Google Scholar
Misra, B. and Sudarshan, E.C.G. (1977). J. Math. Phys. 18, 756.CrossRef
Ne'eman, Y. (1967). Algebraic Theory of Particle Physics (New York, W.A. Benjamin).Google Scholar
Newton, R.J. (1976). Scattering Theory of Particles and Waves (New York, McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
Parravicini, G., Gorini, V. and Sudarshan, E.C.G. (1980). J. Math. Phys. 21, 2208.CrossRef
Piron, C. (1976). Foundations of Quantum Physics (Reading, Mass., Benjamin/Cummings).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, M. and Simon, B. (1972). Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I, Functional Analysis (New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar
Reed, M. and Simon, B. (1979). Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics III, Scattering Theory (New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar
Riesz, F. and Sz.-Nagy, B. (1955). Functional Analysis (New York, F. Ungar).Google Scholar
Schwinger, S. (1951). Phys. Rev. 82, 664.CrossRef
Simon, B. (1972). Comm. Math. Phys. 27, 1.CrossRef
Sz.-Nagy, B. and Foias, C. (1976). Harmonic Analysis of Operators on Hilbert Space (Amsterdam, North-Holland).Google Scholar
Strauss, Y. (2003). Int. J. Theor. Phys. 42, 2285.CrossRef
Strauss, Y. (2005a). J. Math. Phys. 46, 032104.CrossRef
Strauss, Y. (2005b). J. Math. Phys. 46, 102109.CrossRef
Strauss, Y. (2005c). In Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, Cocoyoc, Mexico, 2–6 August 2004, ed. G. S., Pogosyan, L.R., Vincent and K.B., Wolf, Inst. of Physics Series 185 (Atlanta, Taylor & Francis CRC Press).Google Scholar
Strauss, Y. and Horwitz, L.P. (2000). Found. Phys. 30, 653.CrossRef
Strauss, Y., Horwitz, L.P. and Eisenberg, E. (2000). J. Math. Phys. 41, 8050.CrossRef
Strauss, Y., Horwitz, L.P. and Volovick, A. (2006). J. Math. Phys. 47, 123505.CrossRef
Stueckelberg, E.C.G. (1941). Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 322, 588.
Sz-Nagy, B. and Foias, C. (1976). Harmonic Analysis of Operators on Hilbert Space (Amsterdam, North Holland).Google Scholar
Taylor, J.R. (1972). Scattering Theory (New York, Wiley).Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Weisskopf, V.F. and Wigner, E.P. (1930). Z. Phys. 63, 54; (1930) 65, 18.CrossRef
Wilkinson, S.R., Bharucha, C.F., Fischer, M.C., Madison, K.W., Morrow, P.R., Niu, Q., Sudaram, B. and Raizen, M.G. (1997). Nature (London) 387, 575.Google Scholar
Winstein, B. et al. (1997). Results from the Neutral Kaon Program at Fermilab's Meson Center Beamline 1985–1997, FERMILAB-Pub-97/087-E, published on behalf of the E731, E773 and E799 Collaboration (Batavia, Ill., Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory).Google Scholar
Wu, T.T. and Yang, C.N. (1964). Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 380.CrossRef
Zhang, W.M. and Feng, D.H. (1995). Phys. Rep. 252, 1.CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×