Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:55:15.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Andrew Gelman
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberbach, Joel D.Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Aberbach, Joel D.What's Happened to the Watchful Eye?Congress and the Presidency 29, no. 1 (2002): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James A.. “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, no. 4 (2002): 1231–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H.Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and Art.” Annual Review of Political Science 5 (2002): 423–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Snyder, James. The End of Inequality: One Person, One Vote, and the Transformation of American Politics, Issues in American Democracy. New York: Norton, 2008.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Scott, and Mesquita, Ethan Bueno. “Monotone Comparative Statics for Models of Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2006): 214–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Tony. Trench Warfare 1914–1918: The Live and Let Live System. New York: Holmes and Meier, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athey, Susan, Milgrom, Paul, and Roberts, John. Robust Comparative Statics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1998.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Ayala, Cesar J., and Bergad, Laird W.. “Rural Puerto Rico in the Early Twentieth Century Reconsidered: Land and Society, 1899–1915.” Latin American Research Review 37 (2002): 65–97.Google Scholar
Babbie, Earl R.The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
Bailey, Michael, and Chang, Kelly H.. “Comparing Presidents, Senators, and Justices: Interinstitutional Preference Estimation.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17, no. 2 (2001): 477–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M.What's the Matter with What's the matter with Kansas?Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1, no. 2 (2006): 201–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgart, Winfried. “The Economic Theory of Imperialism.” In Imperialism: The Idea and Reality of British and French Colonial Expansion, 1880–1914, 91–135. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D., eds. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
Baumol, William. “Productivity Growth, Convergence and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show.” American Economic Review 76, no. 5 (1986): 1072–85.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R.Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L.Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective. New York: Knopf, 1963.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. Three Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder, ed. Hardy, Henry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy G.Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Beveridge, Andrew A.Local Lending Practice: Borrowers in a Small Northeastern Industrial City, 1832–1915.” Journal of Economic History 45, no. 2 (1985): 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Arthur. Monetary Policy Under the International Gold Standard, 1880–1914. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 1959.Google Scholar
Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, and Prein, Gerald, eds. Rational Choice Theory and Large Scale Data Analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998.
Boix, Carles, and Stokes, Susan C. “Endogenous Democratization.” World Politics 55 (2003): 517–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Michael D. “The Bretton Woods International Monetary System: A Historical Overview.” In A Retrospective on the Bretton Woods System: Lessons for International Monetary Reform, ed. Bordo, Michael D. and Eichengreen, Barry, 3–98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Michael D., and Eichengreen, Barry, eds. A Retrospective on the Bretton Woods System: Lessons for International Monetary Reform, National Bureau of Economic Research Project Report. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.CrossRef
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S.. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists: Analytical Methods for Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Brundage, W. Fitzhugh, ed. Under Sentence of Death: Lynching in the South. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997.
Brush, Steven G.Dynamics of Theory Change in the Social Sciences: Relative Deprivation and Collective Violence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 40, no. 4 (1996): 523–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles M., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. “A Signaling Theory of Congressional Oversight.” Games and Economic Behavior 5, no. 44 (1993): 44–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T., and Stanley, Julian C.. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1963.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E.Polls and Votes. The Trial-Heat Presidential Election Forecasting Model, Certainty, and Political CampaignsAmerican Politics Quarterly 24, no. 4 (1996): 408–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, James E., and Garand, James C., eds. Before the Vote, Forecasting American National Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999.
Cantril, Hadley. The Psychology of Social Movements. New York: Wiley, 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmagnani, Marcello. “Demografía Y Sociedad: La Estructura Social de Los Centros Mineros Del Norte de México, 1600–1720.” Historia Mexicana 21 (1972): 419–59.Google Scholar
Chaunu, Pierre. “Histoire Quantitative Ou Histoire Sérielle?Cahiers des Annales, 3 (1964): 165–76.Google Scholar
Chiang, Chin L.Introduction to Stochastic Processes in Biostatistics. New York: Wiley, 1968.Google Scholar
Clarida, Richard, Gali, Jordi, and Gertler, Mark. “Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence.” European Economic Review 42, no. 6 (1998): 1033–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, William S.Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (1979): 829–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, William S.The Elements of Graphing Data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Cleveland, William S.Visualizing Data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Cobban, Alfred. The Social Interpretation of the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Cole, Stephen, ed. What's Wrong with Sociology?New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 2001.
Coleman, James S.The Adolescent Society: The Social Life of Teenagers and Its Impact on Education. New York: Free Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S.Equality and Achievement in Education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Costa, Dora L., and Kahn, Matthew E.. “Changes in the Value of Life, 1940–1980.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 29, no. 2 (2004): 159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Katz, Jonathan. “Why Did the Incumbency Advantage Grow?American Journal of Political Science 40 (1996): 478–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, Nicholas, F. R. “Quantitative Economic History. Working Paper 48.” In The Economic History Working Paper SeriesLondon: London School of Economics, 1999.Google Scholar
Crosby, Alfred W.The Measure of Reality: Quantification and Western Society, 1250–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Cumby, Robert E., and Mishkin, Frederic S.. “The International Linkage of Real Interest Rates: The European–U.S. Connection.” Journal of International Money and Finance 5, no. 1 (1986): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, Philip D.The Atlantic Slave Trade: A Census. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf. “Social Science.” In The Social Science Encyclopedia, 2nd ed., ed. Kuper, Adam and Kuper, Jessica, 800–2. New York: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Long, J. Bradford.Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: Comment.” American Economic Review 78, no. 5 (1988): 1138–54.Google Scholar
Dehejia, Rajeev H. “Estimating Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies.” In Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives, ed. Gelman, Andrew and Meng, Xiao-Li, 25–36. New York: Wiley, 2004.Google Scholar
Dehejia, Rajeev H., and Wahba, Sadek. “Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (1999): 1053–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desrosiers, Alain. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, and Feddersen, Timothy J.. “Information and Congressional Hearings.” American Journal of Political Science 44, no. 1 (2000): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. Einleitung in Die Geisteswissenschaften: Versuch Einer Grundlegung Für Das Studien Der Gesellschaft Und Der Geschichte. Leipzig: Dunker and Humblot, 1883.Google Scholar
Dilthey, WilhelmIntroduction to the Human Sciences: An Attempt to Lay a Foundation for the Study of Society and History. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Dimaggio, Paul, Evans, John, and Bryson, Bethany. “Have Americans' Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?American Journal of Sociology 102, no. 3 (1996): 690–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiPrete, Thomas A., and Soule, Whitman T.. “Gender and Promotion in Segmented Job Ladder Systems.” American Sociological Review 53, no. 1 (1988): 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diprete, Thomas A., and Soule, Whitman T..“The Organization of Career Lines: Equal Employment Opportunity and Status Advancement in a Federal Bureaucracy.” American Sociological Review 51, no. 3 (1986): 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorman, Peter. Markets and Mortality: Economics, Dangerous Work, and the Value of Human Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorman, Peter, and Hagstrom, Paul. “Wage Compensation for Dangerous Work Revisited.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52 (1998): 116–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Boston: Addison-Wesley 1957.Google Scholar
Easterly, William R.The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists' Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Edlin, Aaron S., Gelman, Andrew, and Kaplan, Noah. “Voting as a Rational Choice: Why and How People Vote to Improve the Well-Being of Others.” Rationality and Society 19 (2007): 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eells, Ellery. Probabilistic Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon.Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enelow, James M., and Hinich, J. Melvin. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
England, Paula. Comparable Worth Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine Transaction, 1992.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Martin, Andrew D., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Westerland, Chad. “The Judicial Common Space.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 23, no. 2 (2007): 303–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S.The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections.” Polity 3 (1971): 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Richard J.In Defense of History. New York: W. W. Norton, 2000.Google Scholar
Fair, Ray C. “An Estimate of the Uncertainty of Policy Effects in a Macro-Economic Model.” In Discussion Papers, Cowles Foundation. New Haven, CT: Yale University, 1978.Google Scholar
Farber, Henry S., and Gowa, Joanne. “Polities and Peace.” International Security 20, no. 2 (1995): 123–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Shipan, Charles. “Congressional Influence on Administrative Agencies: A Case Study of Telecomunications Policy.” In Congress Reconsidered, 4th ed., ed. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Thomas. Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Finch, Janet. Married to the Job: Wives' Incorporation in Men's Work. London: Allen and Unwin, 1983.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Longman, 2005.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., and Noll, Roger G.. “Voters, Bureaucrats and Legislators: A Rational Choice Perspective on the Growth of Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Economics 9 (1978): 239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Ronald Aylmer.Statistical Methods for Research Workers. New York: Macmillan, 1925.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan and Taylor, Shelley. Social Cognition, from Brains to Culture. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert W.Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert W., and Engerman, Stanley L.. Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery. Boston: Little, Brown, 1974.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel.Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York: Vintage Books, 1965.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books, 1975.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel.L'hermeneutique du Sujet: Cours au Collège de France Hautes Études. Paris: Seuil, 2001.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H. “Altruism and Turnout.” Journal of Politics 68, no. 3 (2006): 674–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, John. An R and S-Plus Companion to Applied Regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.Google Scholar
Frank, Thomas. What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “The Dynamics of Transference.” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Pyschological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12), ed. Freud, Sigmund. London: Hogarth Press, 1912.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey, ed. The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.
Friedman, Milton. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Furet, François.Penser la Revolution Française. Paris: Gallimard, 1978.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. “Voting, Fairness, and Political Representation (with discussion).” Chance 15, no. 3 (2002): 22–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. “Game Theory as Ideology: Some Comments on Robert Axelrod's ‘The Evolution of Cooperation.’QA-Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria (2008).Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. “Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias.” American Journal of Political Science 34, no. 4 (1990): 1142–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary.“Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?British Journal of Political Science 23, no. 1 (1993): 409–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. “A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans.” American Journal of Political Science 38, no. 2 (1994): 514–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Meng, Xiao-Li, eds. Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives. New York: Wiley, 2004.CrossRef
Gelman, Andrew, Park, David, Shor, Boris, Bafumi, Joseph, and Cortina, Jeronimo. Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. “Causation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 17, no. 2 (2005): 163–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John.Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyl, Pieter. Napoleon: Voor En Tegen in De Franse Geschiedschrijving. Utrecht: A. Oosthoek, 1946.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Robert S.Incentives in Organizations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, no. 4 (1998): 115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godoy, Ricardo A.Mining and Agriculture in Highland Bolivia: Ecology, History and Commerce among the Jukumanis. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Góes, José Roberto.O Cativeiro Imperfeito. Um Estudo Sobre a Escravidão No Rio De Janeiro Da Primeira Metade Do Século Xix. Vitória, Vitória Lineart, 1993.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John H.On Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert, and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. “Political Science: The Discipline.” In A New Handbook of Political Science, ed. Goodin, Robert and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, 3–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Graunt, John. Natural and Political Observations Made Upon the Bills of Morality. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, reprinted 1939.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, and Shapiro, Ian. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Greene, William H.Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2007.Google Scholar
Groves, Robert M., Jr., Fowler, Floyd J., Couper, Mick P., Lepkowski, James M., Singer, Eleanor, and Tourangeau, Roger. Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2004.Google Scholar
Gwartney, James, and Haworth, Charles. “Employer Costs and Discrimination: The Case of Baseball.” The Journal of Political Economy 82, no. 4 (1974): 873–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, James D.Time Series Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hanke, Steve, Jonung, Lars, and Schuler, Kurt. Russian Currency and Finance: A Currency Board Approach to Reform. Oxford: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Hansen, Bruce E.The New Econometrics of Structural Change: Dating Breaks in U.S. Labor Productivity.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (2001): 117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Garrett. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (1968): 1243–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Harford, Tim. The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor – and Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Harvey, Andrew C.Time Series Models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hastie, Reid, and Dawes, Robyn M.. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World: The Psychology of Judgement and Decision Making. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2001.Google Scholar
Hastie, Trevor J., and Tibshirani, Robert J.. Generalized Additive Models. London: Chapman & Hall, 1990.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Fumio. Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J.The Scientific Model of Causality.” Sociological Methodology 35 (2005): 1–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James J., and Vytlacil, Edward. “Structural Equations, Treatment Effects, and Econometric Policy Evaluation.” Econometrica 73, no. 3 (2005): 669–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, Peter, and Swedberg, Richard, eds. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory Studies in Rationality and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRef
Henry, Louis. Manuel de Démographie Historique. Geneva: Libraire Droz, 1967.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. London: Touchstone, 1997.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Carl, and Reed, John Shelton. “Sex Discrimination? The Xyz Affair.” Public Interest 62 (1981): 21–39.Google Scholar
Hotelling, Harold. “Stability in Competition.” Economic Journal 39 (1929): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovland, Carl I., and Sears, Robert R.. “Minor Studies of Aggression: Correlation of Lynchings with Economic Indices.” Journal of Psychology 9 (1940): 301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Pat. History by Numbers: An Introduction to Quantitative Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hull, David. “The Need for a Mechanism.” In Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, 277–321. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto. “Experimental Designs for Political Communication Research: From Shopping Malls to the Internet.” Paper presented at the Workshop in Mass Media Economics, London, 2002. Available at http://pcl.stanford.edu/common/docs/research/iyengar/2002/expdes2002.pdf.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R.. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C.Politics of Congressional Elections, 6th ed. Washington, DC: Longman, 2003.Google Scholar
Jaffary, Nora E.False Mystics: Deviant Orthodoxy in Colonial Mexico. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Jones, Alice Hanson.Wealth of a Nation to Be: The American Colonies on the Eve of the Revolution. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos, eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRef
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (1979): 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth M.Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Kerner, Otto, Lindsay, John V., Harris, Fred R., Brooke, Edward W., Corman, James C., Mcculloch, William M., I. W. Abel, Thornton, Charles B., Wilkins, Roy, Peden, Katherine G., and Jenkins, Herbert. Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. New York: Bantam Books, 1968.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Bruce, John, and Gelman, Andrew. “Racial Fairness in Legislative Redistricting.” In Classifying by Race, ed. Peterson, Paul E., 85–110. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
King, Gregory. Two Tracts by Gregory King. (a) Natural and Political Observations and Conclusions Upon the State and Condition of England. (b) of the Naval Trade of England Ao. 1688 and the National Profit Then Arising Thereby. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1936.Google Scholar
Klein, Herbert S.The American Finances of the Spanish Empire, 1680–1809. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Klein, Herbert S.The Middle Passage: Comparative Studies in the Atlantic Slave Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Herbert S.Peasant Communities in Rebellion: The Tzeltal Republic of 1772.” Pacific Historical Review 35 (1966): 247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Herbert S., and Luna, Francisco Vidal. “Sources for the Study of Brazilian Economic and Social History on the Internet.” Hispanic American Historical Review 84 (2004): 701–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Herbert S., and Willis, Edmund P.. “The Distribution of Wealth in Late 18th Century New York City.” Historie Sociale/Social History 18 (1985): 259–83.Google Scholar
Kleinbaum, David G.Survival Analysis. New York: Springer, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, Joseph B., and Wish, Myron. Multidimensional Scaling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Labrousse, Ernest. Esquisse du Mouvement des Prix et des RevenusaAu Xviiie Siècle. Paris: Dalloz, 1933.Google Scholar
Labrousse, Ernest.La Crise de L'economie Française a la Fin de L'ancien Régime et au Début de la Révolution. Paris: PUF, 1944.Google Scholar
Lalonde, Robert J.Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data.” American Economic Review 76 (1986): 604–20.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter. The World We Have Lost, Further Explored. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1984.Google Scholar
Levitt, Peggy. The Transnational Villagers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.
Lewis, Oscar. La Vida: A Puetro Rican Family in the Culture of Poverty. New York: Vintage Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Rice, Tom W.. Forecasting Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Liebow, Elliot. Tally's Corner: A Study of Negro Streetcorner Men. Boston: Little, Brown, 1967.Google Scholar
Lohr, Sharon L.Sampling: Design and Analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press, 1999.Google Scholar
López Beltrán, Clara. Alianzas Familiares. Élite, Género y Negocios en La Paz, S. Xvii. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, 1989.Google Scholar
Luce, R. Duncan, and Raiffa, Howard. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: Wiley, 1989.Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus. Phases of Capitalist Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. “Anthropology.” In Encyclopedia Britannica. London: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1936.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw.Magic, Science and Religion. Boston: Beacon Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Malthus, Thomas R.An Essay on the Principle of Population, as It Affects the Future Improvement of Society. With Remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers. London: Printed for J. Johnson, 1798.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. Gregory.Principles of Economics. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western, 2003.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael, and Mcintyre, Lee C., eds. Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.
Maurer, Stephen B., and Tucker, Albert W.An Interview with Albert W. Tucker.” Two-Year College Mathematics Journal 14, no. 3 (1983): 210–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R.Congress: The Electoral Connection, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Paul, and Shannon, Chris. “Monotone Comparative Statics.” Econometrica 62 (1994): 157–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Dale T.The Norm of Self-Interest.” American Psychologist 54 (1999): 1053–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mintz, Alexander. “A Re-Examination of Correlations between Lynchings and Economic Indices.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41 (1946): 154–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mishkin, Frederic S.The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. New York: HarperCollins, 1995.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel, ed. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History. London: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Morgan, Mary S.The History of Econometric Ideas: Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Stephen L., and Winship, Christopher. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, Rebecca. Methods and Models: A Guide to the Empirical Analysis of Formal Models in Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Ernest. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1961.Google Scholar
Neal, Radford. Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks. New York: Springer, 1993.Google Scholar
Neyman, Jerzy. “On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9.” Statistical Science 5, no. 4 (1990): 465–80 (translated from Polish original from 1923).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C., and Thomas, Robert P.. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurkse, Ragnar. International Currency Experience: Lessons of the Inter-War Period. Geneva: League of Nations, 1944.Google Scholar
Olzak, Susan, and Shanahan, Suzanne. “Deprivation and Race Riots: An Extension of Spilerman‘s Analysis.”Social Forces 74 (1996): 931–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olzak, Susan, Shanahan, Suzanne, and McEneaney, Elisabeth H.. “Poverty, Segregation, and Race Riots, 1960–1993.” American Sociological Review 61 (1996): 590–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C.Game Theory and Political Theory: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, Judea. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Peña Sánchez de Rivera, Daniel, and Sánchez-Albornoz, Nicolás. Dependencia Dinámica Entre Precios Agrícolas: El Trigo en España 1857–1890, Estudios de Historia Económica. Madrid: Banco de España-Servicio de Estudios, 1983.Google Scholar
Perlo, Victor. The Negro in Southern Agriculture. New York: International Publishers, 1953.Google Scholar
Pinson, Koppel. Modern Germany, Its History and Civilization. New York: Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar
Pleck, Joseph H.The Work–Family Role System.” Social Problems 24, no. 4 (1977): 417–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. “Immigration Theory for a New Century: Some Problems and Opportunities.” International Migration Review 31 (1997): 799–825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portes, Alejandro. The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1998.
Prendergast, Canice. “The Provision of Incentives in Firms.” Journal of Economic Literature 37 (1999): 7–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Limogni, Fernando. “Modernization: Theories and Facts.” World Politics 49 (1997): 155–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiggin, John. “Egoistic Rationality and Public Choice: Critical Review of Theory and Evidence.” Economic Record 63 (1987): 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia, and Everitt, Brian S.. A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using Stata, 3rd ed. London: CRC Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R.Structure and Function in Primitive Society. London: Cohen and West, 1952.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Fred, and Schafer, Daniel. The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Raper, Arthur F.The Tragedy of Lynching. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Ray, James Lee.Does Democracy Cause Peace?Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1998): 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Paul D.Primer in Theory Construction. New York: Allyn and Bacon, 2006.Google Scholar
Rhoads, Steven E.The Economist's View of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Robins, James M., and Greenland, Sander. “Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect Effects.” Epidemiology 3 (1992): 143–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romer, Christina D.Spurious Volatility in Historical Unemployment Data.” Journal of Political Economy 94 (1986a): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Christina D.Is the Stabilization of the Postwar Economy a Figment of the Data?American Economic Review 76 (1986b): 314–34.Google Scholar
Romer, Christina D., and Romer, David H.. “Federal Reserve Information and the Behavior of Interest Rates.” American Economic Review 90 (2000): 429–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N.Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power.”Review of Politics 54 (1992): 369–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Rachel A.Job Mobility and Career Proesses.” Annual Review of Sociology 18 (1992): 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J.Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Dorothy. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Ross, Sheldon M.Introduction to Probability Models. New York: Academic Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H., Richard Berli, David P. Boesel, Bettye K. Eidson, and W. Eugene Groves. “Between White and Black – the Faces of American Institutions in the Ghetto.” In Supplemental Studies for the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders, 69–208. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1968.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B.Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66 (1974): 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutkus, Denis Steven, and Bearden, Maureen. “Supreme Court Nominations, 1789–2005: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President.” In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service–Library of Congress, 2005.Google Scholar
Sala-I-Martin, Xavier. “The World Distribution of Income: Failing Poverty … and Convergence, Period.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (2006): 351–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvatore, Dominick. International Economics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cover, Albert D.. “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” American Political Science Review 83 (1989): 557–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T.. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.Google Scholar
Shapiro, David. Neurotic Styles. New York: Basic Books, 1965.Google Scholar
Shaughnessy, John J., Zechmeister, Eugene, and Zechmeister, Jeanne. Research Methods in Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R., eds. Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.CrossRef
Smelser, Neil J.Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jeffrey, and Todd, Petra. “Does Matching Overcome Lalonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?”: University of Maryland and University of Pennsylvania, 2003. Available at http://www.nber.org/~rdehejia/cvindex#0.
Snidal, Duncan. “Coordination versus Prisoners' Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes.”American Political Science Review 79 (1985): 923–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, David, and Kelly, William R.. “Conflict Intensity, Media Sensitivity and the Validity of Newspaper Data.” American Sociological Review 42 (1977): 105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, Michael E. “Causal Inference in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.” In Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. Arminger, Gerhard, C, Cliffor. Clogg, , and Sobel, Michael E., 1–38. New York: Plenum Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Sobel, Michael E.Discussion of the Scientic Model of Causality by James Heckman.” Sociological Methodology 35 (2005): 99–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Southern Commission on the Study of Lynching. “Lynchings and What They Mean.” Atlanta: Southern Commission on the Study of Lynching, 1931.
Spilerman, Seymour. “The Causes of Racial Disturbances: A Comparison of Alternative Explanations.” American Sociological Review 35 (1970): 627–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilerman, Seymour.“The Causes of Racial Disturbances: Tests for an Explanation.” American Sociological Review 36 (1971): 427–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilerman, Seymour.“Structural Characteristics of Cities and the Severity of Racial Disorders.” American Sociological Review 41 (1976): 771–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spilerman, Seymour, and Elesh, David. “Alternative Conceptions of Poverty and Their Implications for Income Maintenance.” Social Problems 18 (1971): 358–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilerman, Seymour, and Lunde, Tormud. “Features of Educational Attainment and Job Promotion Prospects.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (1991): 689–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilerman, Seymour, and Petersen, Trond. “Organizational Structure, Determinants of Promotion, and Gender Differences in Attainment.” Social Science Research 28 (1999): 203–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilerman, Seymour, and Schrank, Harris. “Responses to the Intrusion of Family Responsibilities in the Workplace.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 10 (1991): 27–61.Google Scholar
Spiller, Roger J.S.L.A. Marshall and the Ratio of Fire.” RUSI Journal 133 (Winter 1988): 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E.How to Think Straight about Psychology, 7th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2004.Google Scholar
Stecklov, Guy, and Goldstein, Joshua R.. “Terror Attacks Influence Driving Behavior in Israel.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (2004): 14551–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stigler, George J. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” In Chicago Studies in Political Economy, ed. Stigler, George J., 209–33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L.Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt and Brace, 1968.Google Scholar
Taylor, John. “Discretion Versus Policy Rules in Practice.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference on Public Policy 39 (1993): 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephan. Poverty and Progress: Social Mobility in a Nineteenth Century City. New York: Atheneum, 1970.Google Scholar
Tolnay, Stewart E., and Beck, E. M.. A Festival of Violence: An Analysis of Southern Lynchings, 1882–1930. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Truman, David Bicknell.The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
,U.S. Census Bureau. “Twelfth Census of the United States, Manufactures,” Vol VIII. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 1900.
,U.S. Congress, Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly of the Committee on the Judiciary. “Hearings on Economic Concentration.” Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964–6.
Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. London: Macmillan, 1912.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip.Risk Equity.” Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 843–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip, and Aldy, Joseph E.. “The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates throughout the World.” NBER Working Paper No. 9487. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003.Google Scholar
Weber, Robert P.Basic Content Analysis: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winship, Christopher, and Sobel, Michael E.. “Causal Inference in Sociological Studies.” In The Handbook of Data Analysis, ed. Hardy, Melissa A., 481–503. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, Karl. Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher, and Erikson, Robert S.. “The Fundamentals, the Polls and the Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37, no. 4 (2004): 747–51.Google Scholar
Woodward, C. Vann. “Southern Slaves in the World of Thomas Malthus.” In American Counterpoint: Slavery and Racism in the North/South Dialogue, 78–106. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M.Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar
Wrigley, Edward A., and Scholefield, Roger S.. The Population History of England, 1541–1871: A Reconstruction: Cambridge Studies in Population, Economy and Society in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Zivot, Eric, and Donald, W. K.Andrews. “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10 (1992): 251–70.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Andrew Gelman, Columbia University, New York, Jeronimo Cortina
  • Book: A Quantitative Tour of the Social Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818851.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Andrew Gelman, Columbia University, New York, Jeronimo Cortina
  • Book: A Quantitative Tour of the Social Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818851.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Andrew Gelman, Columbia University, New York, Jeronimo Cortina
  • Book: A Quantitative Tour of the Social Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818851.025
Available formats
×