Public Governance as Co-creation A Strategy for Revitalizing the Public Sector and Rejuvenating Democracy
Book contents
- Public Governance as Co-creation
- Cambridge Studies in Comparative Public Policy
- Public Governance as Co-creation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 A New Public Governance Based on Co-creation
- 2 The Concept of Co-creation
- 3 Co-creation Is Everywhere and Nowhere
- 4 Co-creation as Generative Governance
- 5 The Complex and Dynamic Process of Co-creating Public Value
- 6 Pathways to Co-created Public Value Outcomes
- 7 Co-creation as the Reinvention of Democracy
- 8 Mainstreaming and Scaling Co-creation
- 9 Handling Dilemmas, Avoiding the Dark Side, and Tackling Democratic Problems
- 10 Where Are We Today, and Where to Go from Here?
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2021
Book contents
- Public Governance as Co-creation
- Cambridge Studies in Comparative Public Policy
- Public Governance as Co-creation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 A New Public Governance Based on Co-creation
- 2 The Concept of Co-creation
- 3 Co-creation Is Everywhere and Nowhere
- 4 Co-creation as Generative Governance
- 5 The Complex and Dynamic Process of Co-creating Public Value
- 6 Pathways to Co-created Public Value Outcomes
- 7 Co-creation as the Reinvention of Democracy
- 8 Mainstreaming and Scaling Co-creation
- 9 Handling Dilemmas, Avoiding the Dark Side, and Tackling Democratic Problems
- 10 Where Are We Today, and Where to Go from Here?
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Public Governance as Co-creationA Strategy for Revitalizing the Public Sector and Rejuvenating Democracy, pp. 266 - 311Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 586–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adekunle, A. A. & Fatunbi, A. O. (2012). Approaches for setting-up multi-stakeholder platforms for agricultural research and development. World Applied Sciences Journal, 16(7), 981–988.Google Scholar
Academy of Sciences (2014). Building Community Disaster Resilience through Private–Public Collaboration. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Ackermann, F. & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice. Long Range Planning, 44, 179–196.Google Scholar
Agger, A. & Jensen, J. O. (2015). Area-based initiatives – and their work in bonding, bridging and linking social capital. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2045–2061.Google Scholar
Ahn, H. C. (2007). Design tools and three steps in participatory design processes: A proposal for better communications among residents and experts, based on a case project of neighborhood park in Seoul, Korea. In 6th Conference of the Pacific Rim Community Design Network. pp. 1–10. http://courses.washington.edu/quanzhou/pacrim/proceedings.htmlGoogle Scholar
Alexander, E. R. (2005). Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization theory to institutional design. Planning Theory, 4(3), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, J. (2014). The multiple facets of co-production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom. Public Management Review, 16(3), 299–316.Google Scholar
Alford, J. (2010). Public value from co-production with clients. In Moore, M. H. & Benington, J., eds., Public Value: Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 144–157.Google Scholar
Alford, J. (2009). Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service-Delivery to Co-Production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Alford, J. (2002). Defining the client in the public sector: A social-exchange perspective. Public Administration Review, 62(3), 337–346.Google Scholar
Alford, J. (1998). A public management road less travelled: Clients as co‐producers of public services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57(4), 128–137.Google Scholar
Alford, J. & Yates, S. (2016). Co‐production of public services in Australia: The roles of government organisations and co‐producers. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(2), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, H. (2013). Co-creation and innovation in public services. The Service Industries Journal, 33(7–8), 671–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2006). Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance. In Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J. Jr, & Walker, R. M. eds., Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 14–34.Google Scholar
Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2013). Escaping capability traps through problem driven iterative adaption (PDIA). World Development, 51, 234–244.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. (2019). Coping with conceptual pluralism: Reflections on concept formation. Public Performance & Management Review, 1–22, DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2019.1677254Google Scholar
Ansell, C. (2016). Pragmatism. In Ansell, C. & Torfing, J., eds., Handbook of Theories of Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 392–401.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. (2011). Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, C. & Bartenberger, M. (2019). Pragmatism and Political Crisis Management: Principle and Practical Rationality during the Financial Crisis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. & Bartenberger, M. (2017). The diversity of experimentation in the experimenting society. In Poel, I., Asveld, L., & Mehos, D. C., eds., New Perspectives on Technology in Society. London: Routledge, pp. 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, C. & Bartenberger, M. (2016). Varieties of experimentalism. Ecological Economics, 130, 64–73.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2017). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2012). Stewards, mediators, and catalysts: Toward a model of collaborative leadership. The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 2–21.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. & Geyer, R. (2017). “Pragmatic complexity” a new foundation for moving beyond “evidence-based policy making”? Policy Studies, 38(2), 149–167.Google Scholar
Ansell, C., Lundin, M., & Öberg, P. (2017). How learning aggregates: A social network analysis of learning between Swedish municipalities. Local Government Studies, 43(6), 903–926.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. & Miura, S. (2019). Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance? Public Administration, 98(1), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, C. & Torfing, J. (eds.) (2018). How Does Collaborative Governance Scale? Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. & Torfing, J. (2014). Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2020). The social embedding of generic governance instruments. In Meek, J., ed., Handbook on Collaborative Public Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2017). Improving policy implementation through collaborative policymaking. Policy and Politics, 45(3), 467–486.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. & Trondal, J. (2017). Governing turbulence: An organizational-institutional agenda. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate Strategy: Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Anttiroiko, A. V. (2016). City-as-a-platform: The rise of participatory innovation platforms in Finnish cities. Sustainability, 8(9), 922.Google Scholar
Aragón, P., Kaltenbrunner, A., Calleja-López, A., Pereira, A., Monterde, A., Barandiaran, X. E., & Gómez, V. (2017). Deliberative platform design: The case study of the online discussions in Decidim Barcelona. In Ciampaglia, G., Mashhadi, A., & Yasseri, T., eds., Social Informatics. SocInfo 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10540. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autio, E. & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: Implications for innovation management? In Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., & Phillips, N., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 204–228.Google Scholar
Bache, I. & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-level governance and the study of the British State. Public Policy and Administration, 19(1), 31–51.Google Scholar
Bächtiger, A. (2014). Debate and deliberation in legislatures. In Martin, S., Saalfeld, T., & Strøm, K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–166.Google Scholar
Badaracco, J. L. Jr. (2001). We don’t need another hero. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 120–126.Google Scholar
Banks, J. S. & Weingast, B. R. (1992). The political control of bureaucracies under asymmetric information. American Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 509–524.Google Scholar
Bang, H. (2005). Among everyday makers and expert citizens. In Newman, J., eds., Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 159–178.Google Scholar
Bang, H. P. & Sørensen, E. (1999). The everyday maker: A new challenge to democratic governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(3), 325–341.Google Scholar
Banerjee, B. (2010). Designer as Agent of Change. Available at: https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5a9898f92fa8fa00017acfa3/5c63e109cbc13e075f6db2aa_Banny%20Banerjee-Designer%20as%20Agent%20of%20Change.pdfGoogle Scholar
Baptista, N., Alves, H., & Matos, N. (2019). Public sector organizations and co-creation with citizens: A literature review on benefits, drivers, and barriers. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 32(3), 217–214, DOI: 10.1080/10495142.2019.1589623Google Scholar
Barber, B. (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barber, M. (2008). Instruction to Deliver: Fighting to Transform Britain’s Public Services. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Barnes, M., Newman, J., & Sullivan, H. (2006). Discursive arenas: Deliberation and the constitution of identity in public participation at a local level. Social Movement Studies, 5(3), 193–207.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. (1999). Public Expectations: From Paternalism to Partnership: Changing Relationships in Health and Health Services. London: Nuffield Trust/University.Google Scholar
Bartenberger, M. & Sześciło, D. (2016). The benefits and risks of experimental co‐production: The case of urban redesign in Vienna. Public Administration, 94(2), 509–525.Google Scholar
Bason, C. (2010). Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-Creating for a Better Society. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Behn, R. D. (1998). The New Public Management paradigm and the search for democratic accountability. International Public Management Journal, 1(2), 131–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benington, J. (2009). Creating the public in order to create public value? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 232–249.Google Scholar
Benington, J. & Moore, M. H. (2011). Public Value: Theory & Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P. A., & Harvey, J. A. (2003). Distributed Leadership: A Review of Literature. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.Google Scholar
Benz, A. & Papadopoulos, I. (2006). Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beran, D., Lazo-Porras, M., Cardenas, M. K., Chappuis, F., Damasceno, A., Jha, N., Madede, T., Lachat, S., Leon, S. P., Pastrana, N. A., Pesantes, M. A., Singh, S. B., Sharma, S., Somerville, C., Suggs, S., & Miranda, J. J. (2018). Moving from formative research to co-creation of interventions: Insights from a community health system project in Mozambique, Nepal and Peru. BMJ Global Health, 3(6), e001183.Google Scholar
Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Eriksson, C. I., Ståhlbröst, A., & Svensson, J. (2009). A milieu for innovation: Defining living labs. In Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium: Simulating Recovery. New York: ISPIM.Google Scholar
Biljohn, M. I. M. & Lues, L. (2019). Citizen participation, social innovation, and the governance of local government service delivery: Findings from South Africa. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(3), 229–241, DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1628052Google Scholar
Birchall, J. & Simmons, R. (2004). User Power: The Participation of Users in Public Services. London: National Consumer Council. Available at: www.ncc.org.uk/nccpdf/poldocs/NCC071ft_user_power.pdf.Google Scholar
Bisschops, S. & Beunen, R. (2019). A new role for citizens’ initiatives: The difficulties in co-creating institutional change in urban planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(1), 72–87.Google Scholar
Blair, T. (1998). The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
Blais, A. (2007). Turnout in Elections. In Dalton, R. J. & Klingemann, H., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 621–635.Google Scholar
Bobbio, L. (2003). Building social capital through democratic deliberation: The rise of deliberative arenas. Social Epistemology, 17(4), 343–357.Google Scholar
Bohmann, J. (2005). From demos to demoi: Democracy across borders. Ratio Juris, 18(3), 293–314.Google Scholar
Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251–269.Google Scholar
Bommert, B. (2010). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International Public Management Review, 11(1), 15–33.Google Scholar
Börzel, T. A. & Panke, D. (2007). Network governance: Effective and legitimate? In Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J., eds., Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 153–166.Google Scholar
Boudjelida, A., Mellouli, S., & Lee, J. (2016). Electronic citizens participation: Systematic review. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Boudreau, K. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849–1872.Google Scholar
Bourgoin, J., Castella, J-C., Pullar, D., Lestrelin, G., & Bouahoun, B. (2012). Toward a land zoning negotiation support platform: “Tips and tricks” for participatory land use planning in Laos. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(2), 270–278.Google Scholar
Bourgon, J. (2009). New directions in public administration: Serving beyond the predictable. Public Policy and Administration, 24(3), 309–330.Google Scholar
Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community co-production of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.Google Scholar
Bovaird, T. & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to coproduction: The contributions of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas, 23(4), 1119–1138.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. (2007a). New forms of accountability and EU governance. Comparative European Politics, 5(1), 104–120.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. (2007b). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.Google Scholar
Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. & Schillemans, T. (2014). Meaningful accountability. In Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E. and Schillemans, T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 673–682.Google Scholar
Bowen, S., McSeveny, K., Lockley, E., Wolstenholme, D., Cobb, M., & Dearden, A. (2013). How was it for you? Experiences of participatory design in the UK health service. CoDesign, 9(4), 230–246.Google Scholar
Bowler, S. & Glazer, A. (2008). Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boyle, D. & Harris, M. (2009). The Challenge of Co-production: How Equal Partnership between Professionals and the Public Can Lead to Improved Public Services. London: NESTA.Google Scholar
Boyne, G. A. & Walker, R. M. (2004). Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 231–252.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (2006). ‘Accountability and Responsibility through Restorative Justice’, in Dowdle, M. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33–51.Google Scholar
Brandsen, T. & Helderman, J. K. (2012). The trade-off between capital and community: The conditions for successful co-production in housing. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1139–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandsen, T. & Honingh, M. (2016). Distinguishing different types of co-production: A conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 427–435.Google Scholar
Brandsen, T. & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: An introduction. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501.Google Scholar
Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018a). Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018b). How to encourage co-creation and co-production: Some recommendations. In Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B., & Steen, T., eds., Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 299–302.Google Scholar
Bressers, N. (2014). The impact of collaboration on innovative projects: A study of Dutch water management. In Ansell, C. & Torfing, J., eds., Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design. London: Routledge, pp. 89–105.Google Scholar
Briggs, X. D. S. (2008). Democracy as Problem-Solving: Civic Capacity in Communities across the Globe. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, E. & Wamsler, C. (2018). Collaborative governance for climate change adaptation: Mapping citizen–municipality interactions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(2), 82–97.Google Scholar
Brogaard, L., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J., (2019). The impact of governance on the outcomes of contracting out. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 3(4), 215–233.Google Scholar
Brown, T. L., Potoski, M., & Slyke, D. M. (2006). Managing public service contracts: Aligning values, institutions, and markets. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 323–331.Google Scholar
Brudney, J. L. (1990a). Expanding the government-by-proxy construct: Volunteers in the delivery of public services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19(4), 315–328.Google Scholar
Brudney, J. L. (1990b). The availability of volunteers: Implications for local governments. Administration and Society, 21(4), 413–424.Google Scholar
Brudney, J. L. (1984). Local co-production of services and the analysis of municipal productivity. Urban Affairs Review, 19(4), 465–484.Google Scholar
Brudney, J. L. (1999). The effective use of volunteers: Best practices for the public sector. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(4), 219-255.Google Scholar
Brudney, J. L. & England, R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the co-production concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1): 59–65.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. (2018). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organisations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. (2011). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement, 4th edn, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. (2004.) What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. (1988). Strategic planning: Big wins and small wins. Public Money and Management, 8(3), 11–15.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. M. & Crosby, B. C. (1993). Policy planning and the design and use of forums, arenas, and courts. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(2), 175–194.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. M., Cunningham, G. L., & Lykkesmoe, K. J. (2002). What to do when stakeholders matter? The case of problem formulation for the African American Men Project of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 568–584.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. M., Patton, M. Q., & Bowman, R. A. (2011). Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach, and toolkit. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 1–12.Google Scholar
Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., & Sørensen, E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 640–654.Google Scholar
Buuren, A., Meerkerk, I., & Tortajada, C. (2019). Understanding emergent participation practices in water governance. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35(3), 367–382.Google Scholar
Bushe, G. R. & Paranjpey, N. (2015). Comparing the generativity of problem solving and appreciative inquiry: A field experiment. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(3), 309–35.Google Scholar
Campos-Matos, I., Chrysou, M., & Ashton, C. (2017). Co-creation of local smoking cessation services: An innovative public health intervention in times of austerity. The Lancet, 390, S31.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16.Google Scholar
Castiglione, D., Deth, J. W. V., & Wolleb, G. (2008). The Handbook of Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cawson, A. (1985). Organized Interests and the State: Studies in Meso-Corporatism. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Cepiku, D. & Giordano, F. (2014). Co-production in developing countries: Insights from the community health workers experience. Public Management Review, 16(3), 317–340.Google Scholar
Christensen, H. E. & McQuestin, D. (2019). Community engagement in Australian local governments: A closer look and strategic implications. Local Government Studies, 45(4), 453–480.Google Scholar
Clark, B. Y, Brudney, J. L., & Jang, S. G. (2013). Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: Investigating the distributional biases. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 687–701.Google Scholar
Clarke, N., Jennings, W., Moss, J., & Stoker, G. (2018). The Good Politician: Folk Theories, Political Interaction, and the Rise of Anti-Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cockburn, C. (2007). From Where We Stand: War, Women’s Activism and Feminist Analysis. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (2007). Deliberative democracy. In Rosenberg, S. W., ed., Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgave Macmillan, pp. 219–236.Google Scholar
Compton, M. & ‘t Hart, P., eds., (2019). Great Policy Successes. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conrad, E. (2015). Bridging the hierarchical and collaborative divide: The role of network managers in scaling up a network approach to water governance in California. Policy & Politics, 43(3), 349–366.Google Scholar
Considine, M. (2013). Governance networks and the question of transformation. Public Administration, 91(2), 438–447.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (1992). On the evolution of language and generativity. Cognition, 44(3), 197–226.Google Scholar
Cornwall, A. & Coelho, V. S. (2007). Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cottam, H. & Leadbeater, C. (2004). Health: Co-Creating Services. London: Design Council.Google Scholar
Coursey, D., Pandey, S. K. & Yang, K. (2012). Public service motivation (PSM) and support for citizen participation: A test of Perry and Vandenabeele’s reformulation of PSM Theory. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 572–582.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. J., Rutter, D., & Thelwall, S. (2004). Service User Involvement in Change Management: A Literature Review. London: National Co-ordinating Centre for Service Delivery and Organisation.Google Scholar
Crosby, B. & Bryson, J. M. (2005). Leadership for the Common Good. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Crosby, B. C. & Bryson, J. M. (2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 211–230.Google Scholar
Crosby, B. C., ‘t Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2017). Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 655–669.Google Scholar
Crozier, M., Huntington, S., & Watanuki, J. (1975). The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Cruz-Coke, M. L. (2001). Between stability and crisis in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 12(1), 137–145.Google Scholar
Cullen, B., Tucker, J., Snyder, K., Lema, Z., & Duncan, A. (2014). An analysis of power dynamics within innovation platforms for natural resource management. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 259–275.Google Scholar
Cuoto, R. A. (2014). Civic leadership. In Rhodes, R. A. W. & ‘t Hart, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 347–361.Google Scholar
Dahl, D. W. & Moreau, C. P. (2007). Thinking inside the box: Why consumers enjoy constrained creative experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 357–369.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (2007). Partisan mobilization, cognitive mobilization and the changing American electorate. Electoral Studies, 26(2), 274–286.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges: Democratic Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (2002). The decline of party identifications. In Dalton, R. J. & Wattenberg, M. P., eds., Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (1999). Political trust in advanced democracies. In Norris, P., ed., Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–77.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. & Welzel, C. (2014). The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Damgaard, B. & Lewis, J. M. (2014). Accountability and citizen participation. In Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 258–272.Google Scholar
Davies, J. S. (2011). Challenging Governance Theory: From Networks to Hegemony. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Davis, A. & Andrew, J. (2017). Co-creating urban environments to engage citizens in a low-carbon future. Procedia Engineering, 180, 651–657.Google Scholar
De Winter, M. (2018). Implementing an integrated care system for chronic patients in Belgium: A co-creation process. International Journal of Integrated Care, 18(S2): 202.Google Scholar
Degnegaard, R. (2014) Co-creation, prevailing streams and a future design trajectory. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and Arts, 10(2), 96–111.Google Scholar
Degnegaard, R., Degnegaard, S., & Coughlan, P. (2015). How to design for large-scale multi-stakeholder co-creation initiatives: Reframing crime prevention challenges with the police in Denmark. Journal of Design, Business & Society, 1(1), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, D. (2013). Can Democracy Be Saved? Participation, Deliberation and Social Movements. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Delwit, P. (2011). Still in decline? Party membership in Europe. In Haute, E., ed., Party Membership in Europe: Exploration into the Anthills of Party Politics. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar
Denis, J. L., Hébert, Y., Langley, A., Lozeau, D., & Trottier, L. H. (2002). Explaining diffusion patterns for complex health care innovations. Health Care Management Review, 27(3), 60–73.Google Scholar
Desouza, K. C. & Bhagwatwar, A. (2014). Technology-enabled participatory platforms for civic engagement: The case of US cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 21(4), 25–50.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449‒472.Google Scholar
Dobre, C. C., Ranzato, M., & Moretto, L. (2019). Citizen involvement in co-producing decentralised stormwater systems in Brussels. CoDesign, https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1631356Google Scholar
Doig, J. W. & Hargrove, E. C. (1990). Leadership and Innovation: Entrepreneurs in Government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Donetto, S., Pierri, P., Tsianakas, V., & Robert, G. (2015). Experience-based co-design and healthcare improvement: Realizing participatory design in the public sector. The Design Journal, 18(2), 227–248.Google Scholar
Dorf, M. C. & Sabel, C. F. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98(2), 267–473.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). On the prospects for democratic deliberation: Values analysis applied to Australian politics. Political Psychology, 21(2), 241–266.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (1994). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Du Gay, P. (2000). In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber – Organization – Ethics. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, P. & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to New Public Management. Public Money and Management, 14(3), 9–16.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New Public Management is dead – long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.Google Scholar
Dunston, R., Lee, A., Boud, D., Brodie, P., & Chiarella, M. (2009). Co-production and health system reform: From re-imagining to re-making. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(1), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzur, A. W. & Hendriks, C. M. (2018). Thick populism: Democracy-enhancing popular participation. Policy Studies, 39(3), 334–351.Google Scholar
Echeverri, P. & Skålén, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373.Google Scholar
Eck, A. & Uebernickel, F. (2016). Untangling generativity: Two perspectives on unanticipated change produced by diverse actors. 24th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). www.researchgate.net/profile/Alexander_Eck/publication/301295204_Untangling_Generativity_Two_Perspectives_on_Unanticipated_Change_Produced_by_Diverse_Actors/links/5751400108ae10d9336ec215.pdfGoogle Scholar
Eden, C. & Ackermann, F. (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Edenbolos, J., Buuren, A., & Schie, N. (2011). Co-producing knowledge: Joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects. Environmental Science and Policy, 14(6), 675–684.Google Scholar
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.Google Scholar
Eggers, W. D. (2016). Delivering on Digital: The Innovators and Technologies that are Transforming Government. New York: Rosetta Books.Google Scholar
Eijk, C. & Steen, T. (2014). Why people co-produce: Analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services. Public Management Review, 16(3), 358–382.Google Scholar
Eijk, C. & Steen, T. (2016). Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 28–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eijk, C., Steen, T. & Verschuere, B. (2017). Co-producing safety in the local community: A q-methodology study on the incentives of Belgian and Dutch members of neighbourhood watch schemes. Local Government Studies, 43(3), 323–343.Google Scholar
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2008). From Teams to Knots: Activity-theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni-Halevy, E. (1993). The Elite Connection: Problems and Potential of Western Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (1996). The Human Side of School Change: Reform, Resistance, and the Real-Life Problems of Innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Fanjoy, M. & Bragg, B. (2019). Embracing complexity: Co-creation with retired immigrant women. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 12(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L. & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224–1239.Google Scholar
Farr, M. (2016). Co-production and value co-creation in outcome-based contracting in public services. Public Management Review, 18(5), 654–672.Google Scholar
Fawcett, P., Flinders, M., Hay, C., & Wood, M. (2017). Anti-Politics, Depoliticization and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fenwick, J. & McMillan, J. (2013). Management development and co-production: Myths and realities. Journal of Management Development, 32(9), 971–983.Google Scholar
Ferlie, E. & Ongaro, E. (2015). Strategic Management in Public Services Organizations: Concepts, Schools and Contemporary Issues. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fernandez, S. & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 168–176.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. C. & Cole, K. M. (1993). Leadership and Management of Volunteer Programs: A Guide for Volunteer Administrators. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4–5), 482–512.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. & Lenhart, J. (2016). Eco-districts: Can they accelerate urban climate planning? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(2), 364–380.Google Scholar
Fledderus, J., Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2014). Restoring trust through the co-production of public services: A theoretical elaboration. Public Management Review, 16(3), 424–443.Google Scholar
Fleischmann, K., Hielscher, S., & Merritt, T. (2016). Making things in fab labs: A case study on sustainability and co-creation. Digital Creativity, 27(2), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, L., Mingo, S. & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443–475.Google Scholar
Flinders, M. (2018). The (anti-)politics of Brexit. In Diamond, P., Nedergaard, P., Rosamond, B. & Lequesne, C., eds., The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit. London: Routledge, pp. 179–193.Google Scholar
Flinders, M. (2012). Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flood, J., Minkler, M., Hennessey Lavery, S., Estrada, J., & Falbe, J. (2015). The collective impact model and its potential for health promotion: Overview and case study of a healthy retail initiative in San Francisco. Health Education & Behavior, 42(5), 654–668.Google Scholar
Floridia, A. (2017). From Participation to Deliberation: A Critical Genealogy of Deliberative Democracy. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Schütz, S., & Heinzl, A. (2014). Control versus generativity: A complex adaptive systems perspective on platforms. 35th International Conference on Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2014/proceedings/ServiceScience/4/Google Scholar
Fox, J. A. (2015). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 72, 346–361.Google Scholar
Frantzeskaki, N. & Rok, A. (2018). Co-producing urban sustainability transitions knowledge with community, policy and science. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29, 47–51.Google Scholar
Franz, Y., Tausz, K., & Thiel, S. K. (2015). Contextuality and co-creation matter: A qualitative case study comparison of living lab concepts in urban research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12), 48–55.Google Scholar
Fung, A. (2009). Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fung, A. (2004). Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fung, A. & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Galuszka, J. (2019). Co-production as a driver of urban governance transformation? The case of the Oplan LIKAS Programme in metro Manila, Philippines. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(3), 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascó, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90–98.Google Scholar
Gascó, M. & Eijk, C. (2018). Case study – the Spanish Project Pla BUITS. In Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B. & Steen, T., eds., Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 77–79.Google Scholar
Gawłowski, R. (2018). Co-production of public services in terms of the Polish experience. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 47(1), 110–120.Google Scholar
Gebauer, H., Johnson, M., & Enquist, B. (2010). Value co-creation as a determinant of success in public transport services: A study of the Swiss federal railway operator (SBB). Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 20(6), 511–530.Google Scholar
Genitsaris, E., Roukouni, A., Stamelou, A., Nalmpantis, D., & Naniopoulos, A. (2017). Co-Creating Innovative Concepts to Address Crucial Trends and Challenges that Public Transport Faces in Thessaloniki. University–Industry Links: Coproducing Knowledge, Innovation & Growth.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J. (1978). Toward generative theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(11), 1344.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gloor, P. A. (2006). Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage through Collaborative Innovation Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. 2003. Assessing the Senate judicial confirmation process: The index of obstruction and delay. Judicature, 86, 251–258.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, S. & Eggers, W. D. (2004). Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (1995). The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gouillart, F. & Billings, D. (2013). Community-powered problem solving. Harvard Business Review, 91(4), 70–77.Google Scholar
Gouillart, F. & Hallett, T. (2015). Co-creation in government. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 13(2), 40–47.Google Scholar
Graaf, S. (2018). Participation and platformization at play. In ComMODify Dynamics of Virtual Work. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar
Graversgaard, M., Hedelin, B., Smith, L., Gertz, F., Højberg, A., Langford, J., Martinez, G., Mostert, E., Ptak, E., Peterson, H., Stelljes, N., Brink, C., & Refsgaard, J. C. (2018). Opportunities and barriers for water co-governance: A critical analysis of seven cases of diffuse water pollution from agriculture in Europe, Australia and North America. Sustainability, 10(5), 1634.Google Scholar
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gray, B. & Ren, H. (2014). The importance of joint schemas and brokers in promoting collaboration for innovation. In Ansell, C. & Torfing, J., eds., Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design. London: Routledge, pp. 125–147.Google Scholar
Greenfield, E. A. & Marks, N. F. (2004). Formal volunteering as a protective factor for older adults’ psychological well-being. The Journals of Gerontology, 59(5), 258–264.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T., Jackson, C., Shaw, S., & Janamian, T. (2016). Achieving research impact through co‐creation in community-based health services: Literature review and case study. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(2), 392–429.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.Google Scholar
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451.Google Scholar
Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. F. (2009). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1985). Civil disobedience: Litmus test for the democratic constitutional state. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 30, 95–116.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. A. (2009). Authoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halmos, A., Misuraca, G., & Viscusi, G. (2019). From public value to social value of digital government: Co-creation and social innovation in European Union initiatives. 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2974–2983.Google Scholar
Hambleton, R. (2019). The new civic leadership: Place and the co-creation of public innovation. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 271–279.Google Scholar
Handberg, C., Mygind, O., & Johansen, J. S. (2018). Lessons learnt on the meaning of involvement and co-creation in developing community-based rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(25), 3052–3060.Google Scholar
Hardyman, W., Daunt, K. L., & Kitchener, M. (2015). Value co-creation through patient engagement in health care: A micro-level approach and research agenda. Public Management Review, 17(1), 90–107.Google Scholar
Hargadon, A. B. & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 417–526.Google Scholar
Harkin, D. (2018). Community safety partnerships: The limits and possibilities of policing with the community. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 20(2), 125–136.Google Scholar
Hartley, J. (2006). Innovation and Its Contribution to Improvement: A Review for Policymakers, Policy Advisers, Managers and Researchers. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Hartley, J., Alford, J., Hughes, O., & Yates, S. (2015). Public value and political astuteness in the work of public managers: The art of the possible. Public Administration, 93(1), 195–211.Google Scholar
Hartley, J. & Benington, J. (2006). Copy and paste, or graft and transplant? Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational networks. Public Money and Management, 26(2), 101–108.Google Scholar
Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830.Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F., Scheufele, D. A., & Huge, M. E. (2006). Nonparticipation as self-censorship: Publicly observable political activity in a polarized opinion climate. Political Behavior, 28(3), 259–283.Google Scholar
Head, B. W. & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration and Society, 47(6), 711–739.Google Scholar
Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. Public Administration Concepts Cases, 413(413), 46–57.Google Scholar
Heerik, R. A., Hooijdonk, C. M., Burgers, C., & Steen, G. J. (2017). Smoking is sóóó. . .Sandals and white socks: Co-creation of a Dutch anti-smoking campaign to change social norms. Health Communication, 32(5), 621–628.Google Scholar
Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The Practice of Adaptive Leadership: Tools and Tactics for Changing your Organization and the World. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Hendriks, C. M. (2016). Coupling citizens and elites in deliberative systems: The role of institutional design. European Journal of Political Research, 55(1), 43–60.Google Scholar
Henfridsson, O. & Bygstad, B. (2013). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 907–931.Google Scholar
Hermansson, H. M. L. (2017). Disaster management collaboration in Turkey: Assessing progress and challenges of hybrid network governance. Public Administration, 94(2), 333–349.Google Scholar
Hertting, N. (2007). Mechanisms of governance network formation: A contextual rational choice perspective. In Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J., eds., Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
Heying, C. (1997). Civic elites and corporate delocalization: An alternative explanation for declining civic engagement. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 657–668.Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R. & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hilgers, D. & Ihl, C. (2010). Citizensourcing: Applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. International Journal of Public Participation, 4(1), 68–88.Google Scholar
Hines, F. (2005). Viable social enterprise: An evaluation of business support to social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal, 1(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (1994). Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (2000). Democracy and governance. In Pierre, J., ed., Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar
Hjelmar, U., Petersen, O. H., & Vrangbæk, K. (2013). Udlicitering af offentlige opgaver i Danmark-en forskningsoversigt over de hidtil dokumenterede effekter. Politica, 45(1), 60–79.Google Scholar
Hofstad, H. & Torfing, J. (2017). Towards a climate-resilient city: Collaborative innovation for a ‘green shift’ in Oslo. In Fernández, R. Á., Zubelzu, S. & Martínez, R. eds., Carbon Footprint and the Industrial Life Cycle, New York: Springer, 221–242.Google Scholar
Homsy, G. C. & Warner, M. E. (2013). Climate change and the co‐production of knowledge and policy in rural USA communities. Sociologia Ruralis, 53(3), 291–310.Google Scholar
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
Hood, C. & Dixon, R. (2015). A Government that Worked Better and Costed Less? Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman.Google Scholar
Hopkins, M. M., Tidd, J., & Nightingale, P. (2014). Positive and negative dynamics of open innovation. In Tidd, J., ed, Open Innovation Research, Management and Practice. London: Imperial College Press, pp. 417–443.Google Scholar
Horsbøl, A. (2018). Co-creating green transition: How municipality employees negotiate their professional identities as agents of citizen involvement in a cross-local setting. Environmental Communication, 12(5), 701–714.Google Scholar
House, F. (2018). Democracy in Crisis: Freedom in the World 2018. Washington DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153–175.Google Scholar
Huang, W. L. & Feeney, M. K. (2016). Citizen participation in local government decision making: The role of manager motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(2), 188–209.Google Scholar
Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. (2013). Managing to Collaborate. The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5–31.Google Scholar
Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. (1996a). Working together. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(7), 5–17.Google Scholar
Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. (1996b). Managing inter-organisational relationships. In Osborne, S. P., ed., Managing in the Voluntary Sector: A Handbook for Managers in Voluntary and Non-Profit Making Organizations. London: International Thompson Business Press, pp. 202–216.Google Scholar
Ibbotson, P. (2008). The Illusion of Leadership: Directing Creativity in Business and the Arts. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
IDEA (2016). Voter Turnout Database. Retrieved 5/12 2019 at: www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout.Google Scholar
Ind, N. & Coates, N. (2013). The meanings of co-creation. European Business Review, 25(1), 86–95.Google Scholar
Ishkanian, A. & Szreter, S. (2012). The Big Society Debate: A New Agenda for Social Policy? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Israilov, S. & Cho, H. J. (2017). How co-creation helped address hierarchy, overwhelmed patients, and conflicts of interest in health care quality and safety. AMA Journal of Ethics, 19(11), 1139–1145.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. (2016). Editorial foreword: E pluribus pluribus, or divided we stand. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 219–224Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.Google Scholar
Jæger, B. & Sørensen, E. (2003). Roller der rykker: Politikere og administratorer mellem hierarki og netværk. Copenhagen: Djøf Publishing.Google Scholar
Jahdi, K. S. & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 103–13.Google Scholar
Janssen, M. & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance – Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), S1–S8.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B. ,& Neale, M. A. (1997). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763.Google Scholar
Jensen, U. T., Andersen, L. B., Bro, L. L., Bøllingtoft, A., Eriksen, T. L. M., Holten, A. L., … & Westergård-Nielsen, N. (2019). Conceptualizing and measuring transformational and transactional leadership. Administration & Society, 51(1), 3–33.Google Scholar
Jensen, P. H. & Stonecash, R. E. (2005). Incentives and the efficiency of public sector‐outsourcing contracts. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(5), 767–787.Google Scholar
Jetté, C. & Vaillancourt, Y. (2011). Social economy and home care service in Quebec: Co-production or co-construction?. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations, 22(1), 48–69.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2003). Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity‐based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. & Moore, M. (2002). Organisations that Reach the Poor: Why Co-Production Matters. Paper presented at the World Bank Symposium on Making Public Services Work for Poor People, Oxford.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. & Moore, M. H. (2004). Institutionalised co-production: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40(4), 31–49.Google Scholar
Kane, J. & Patapan, H. (2012). The Democratic Leader: How Democracy Defines, Empowers, and Limits its Leaders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2013). Embracing emergence: How collective impact addresses complexity. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1–7, January 21, 2013 (website), https://ssir.org/articles/entry/social_progress_through_collective_impactGoogle Scholar
Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1) 36–41.Google Scholar
Katz, R. S. & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
Keast, R., Brown, K., & Mandell, M. (2007). Getting the right mix: Unpacking integration meanings and strategies. International Public Management Journal, 10(1), 9–33.Google Scholar
Kemp, R. & Scholl, C. (2016). City labs as vehicles for innovation in urban planning processes. Urban Planning, 1(4), 89–102.Google Scholar
Kench, P. S., Ryan, E. J., Owen, S., Bell, R., Lawrence, J., Glavovic, B., Blackett, P., Becker, J., Schneider, P., Allis, M., Dickson, M., & Rennie, H. G. (2018). Co-creating resilience solutions to coastal hazards through an interdisciplinary research project in New Zealand. Journal of Coastal Research, 85(sp1), 1496–1500.Google Scholar
Khayyat, M. M. (2017). Co-Creation with Open Government Data: A Constructivist Approach Using a Multiple Case Studies Strategy from an Information Systems Perspective. PhD Thesis. The School of Computer Science and Statistics. Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Kjær, U. & Opstrup, N. (2016). Variationer i udvalgsstyret. Copenhagen: Kommuneforlaget.Google Scholar
Kliemt, H. (1990). The costs of organizing social cooperation. In Hechter, M., Opp, K. D. & Wippler, R., eds., Social Institutions. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 61–80.Google Scholar
Klijn, E. H. & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2014). Accountability and networks. In Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E. & Schillemans, T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 242–257.Google Scholar
Klok, J. (2013). Participatory design and public space: Catalysts for community. Thesis presented to The University of Guelph. Guelph, Canada.Google Scholar
Kohler, T., Fueller, J., Matzler, K., Stieger, D., & Füller, J. (2011). Co-creation in virtual worlds: The design of the user experience. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 773–788.Google Scholar
Koo, Y. & Ahn, H. (2018). Analysis on the utilization of co-design practices for developing consumer-oriented public service and policy focusing on the comparison with Western countries and South Korea. In ServDes2018. Service Design Proof of Concept, Proceedings of the ServDes. 2018 Conference, 18–20 June, Milan, Italy, 150, Linköping University Electronic Press, 281–297.Google Scholar
Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern Governance: Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Koppenjan, J. & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kornberger, M. (2017). The visible hand and the crowd: Analyzing organization design in distributed innovation systems. Strategic Organization, 15(2), 174–193.Google Scholar
Kouzmin, A., Loffler, E., Klages, H., & Korac-Kakabadse, N. (1999). Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors towards learning for agency effectiveness. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(2), 121–144.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laitinen, I., Kinder, T., & Stenvall, J. (2018). Co-design and action learning in local public services. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 24(1), 58–80.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2019), Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the 21st Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2012). Democratic reason: The mechanisms of collective intelligence in politics. In Landemore, H. & Elster, J., eds., Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–289.Google Scholar
Landi, S. & Russo, S. (2019). Co-production as an interpretative framework in the creation of value in public services. Department of Management, Università Ca’Foscari Venezia Working Paper (1).Google Scholar
Larsson, O. S. & Brandsen, T. (2016). The implicit normative assumptions of social innovation research: Embracing the dark side. In Bandsen, T., Cattacin, S., Evers, A. & Zimmer, A., eds., Social Innovations in the Urban Context: Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Cham: Springer, pp. 293–302.Google Scholar
Lasker, R. D. & Weiss, E. S. (2003). Broadening participation in community problem solving: A multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. Journal of Urban Health, 80(1), 14–47.Google Scholar
Layman, G. C. (1999). Culture wars in the American party system: Religious and cultural change among partisan activists since 1972. American Politics Research, 27(1), 89–121.Google Scholar
Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83–110.Google Scholar
Leask, C. F., Sandlund, M., Skelton, D. A., & Chastin, S. F. (2017). Co-creating a tailored public health intervention to reduce older adults’ sedentary behaviour. Health Education Journal, 76(5), 595–608.Google Scholar
Leask, C. F., Sandlund, M., Skelton, D. A., Altenburg, T. M., Cardon, G., Chinapaw, M. J., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Verloigne, M., & Chastin, S. F. M. (2019). Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health intervention. Research Involvement and Engagement, 5(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
Leendertse, W., Langbroek, M., Arts, J., & Nijhuis, A. (2016). Generating spatial quality through co-creation: Experiences from the Blankenburgverbinding (the Netherlands). Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 402–411.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (2003). From pawn to queen: An economics perspective. In Oliver, A., ed., Equity in Health and Healthcare: Views from Ethics, Economics and Political Science. Proceedings from a Meeting of the Health Equity Network. London: The Nuffield Trust, pp. 25–32.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (2003). Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, G. & Schmitter, P. C., eds. (1979). Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lember, V., Brandsen, T., & Tõnurist, P. (2019). The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1665–1686.Google Scholar
Lente, H., Hekkert, M., Smits, R., & Waveren, B. A. S. (2003). Roles of systemic intermediaries in transition processes. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 247–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, C. H. & Fisher, G. (1984). Citizenship and service delivery: The promise of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 44, 178–189.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. W. & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127–149.Google Scholar
Lewis, S., Pea, R., & Rosen, J. (2010). Beyond participation to co-creation of meaning: Mobile social media in generative learning communities. Social Science Information, 49(3), 351–369.Google Scholar
Leyenaar, M. H. & Niemöller, B. (2010). ´European Citizens´ Consultations 2009: Evaluation Report. Brussel: King Baudouin Foundation.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian & Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. (1965). The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision Making Through Mutual Adjustment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lindgreen, A. & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Review, 12(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Loeffler, E. & Bovaird, T. (2018). From participation to co-production: Widening and deepening the contributions of citizens to public services and outcomes. In Ongaro, E. & Thiel, S., eds., The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 403–423.Google Scholar
London, M. & Sessa, V. I. (2007). The development of group interaction patterns: How groups become adaptive, generative, and transformative learners. Human Resource Development Review, 6(4), 353–376.Google Scholar
Long, J. C., Cunningham, F. C., & Braithwaite, J. (2013). Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 13(158), 1–13.Google Scholar
Luke, J. S. (1997). Catalytic Leadership: Strategies for an Interconnected World. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lund, D. H. (2018). Co-creation in urban governance: From inclusion to innovation. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 22(2), 3–17.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. & Hoffmann, C. P. (2017). The dark side of online participation: Exploring non-, passive and negative participation. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 876–897.Google Scholar
Lykkebo, O. B., Jakobsen, N., & Sauer, P. (2018). Innovationsbarometeret: Nyt sammen bedre: En håndbog om innovative samarbejdr i den offentlige sektor. Copenhagen: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. B. (1977). The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. B. (1978). Property, Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Magno, F. & Cassia, F. (2015). Public administrators’ engagement in services co-creation: Factors that foster and hinder organisational learning about citizens. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(11–12), 1161–1172.Google Scholar
Maiello, A., Viegas, C. V., Frey, M., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2013). Public managers as catalysts of knowledge co-production? Investigating knowledge dynamics in local environmental policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 27, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, B. (1987). On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory, 15(3), 338–368.Google Scholar
Mann, T. E. & Ornstein, N. J. (2016). It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. J. (1983). Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Marin, B. & Mayntz, R. (1991). Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Marschall, M. J. (2004). Citizen participation and the neighborhood context: A new look at the co-production of local public goods. Political Research Quarterly, 57(2), 231–244.Google Scholar
Marsh, D. & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Martens, K. (2005). NGO’s and the United Nations: Institutionalization, Professionalization and Adaption. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maru, Y., Sparrow, A., Stirzaker, R. & Davies, J. (2018). Integrated agricultural research for development (IAR4D) from a theory of change perspective. Agricultural Systems 165: 310–320.Google Scholar
Mayangsari, L. & Novani, S. (2015). Multi-stakeholder co-creation analysis in smart city management: An experience from Bandung, Indonesia. Procedia Manufacturing, 4, 315–321.Google Scholar
Mayena, S. B. (2006). The concepts of resilience revisited. Disasters, 30(4), 434–450.Google Scholar
May, P. J. (2014). Implementation failures revisited: Policy regime perspectives. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3–4), 277–299.Google Scholar
Mayo, E. & Moore, H. (2002). Building the Mutual State: Findings from the Virtual Thinktank. London: New Economic Foundation/Mutuo.Google Scholar
McBride, K., Aavik, G., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2018). Co-creating an open government data driven public service: The case of Chicago’s food inspection forecasting model. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/50197Google Scholar
McBride, K., Toots, M., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2019). Turning open government data into public value: Testing the COPS framework for the co-creation of OGD-driven public services. In Rodríguez Bolívar, M., Bwalya, K. & Reddick, C., eds., Governance Models for Creating Public Value in Open Data Initiatives. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol. 31. Cham: Springer, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91–103.Google Scholar
McGill, M. E., Slocum, J. W. Jr, & Lei, D. (1992). Management practices in learning organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 21(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
McMullin, C. & Needham, C. (2018). Co-production in healthcare. In Brandsen, T., Steen, T. & Verschuere, B., eds., Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 151–160.Google Scholar
McMullin, C. (2018). Case study – co-production and community development in France. In Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B. & Steen, T., eds., Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 208–210.Google Scholar
Meerkerk, I. & Edelenbos, J. (2018). Boundary Spanners in Public Management and Governance: An Interdisciplinary Assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Meijer, A. (2012). Co-production in an information age: Individual and community engagement supported by new media. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1156–1172.Google Scholar
Meijer, A. J. (2011). Networked co-production of public services in virtual communities: From a government‐centric to a community approach to public service support. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 598–607.Google Scholar
Meier, K. & Hill, G. (2005). Bureaucracy in the 21st century. In Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. Jr. & Pollitt, C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51–71.Google Scholar
Menny, M., Palgan, Y. V., & McCormick, K. (2018). Urban living labs and the role of users in co-creation. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(1), 68–77.Google Scholar
Mergel, I. (2017). Open innovation in the public sector: Drivers and barriers for the adoption of challenge.gov. Public Management Review, 20(5), 726–745.Google Scholar
Merickova, B. M., Nemec, J., & Svidronova, M. (2015). Co-creation in local public services delivery innovation: Slovak experience. Lex Localis, 13(3), 521.Google Scholar
Meuleman, L. (2008). Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mikheeva, O. & Tõnurist, P. (2019). Co-creation for the reduction of uncertainty in financial governance: The case of monetary authority of Singapore. Halduskultuur, 19(2), 60–80.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A. & Wyborn, C. (2018). Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories. Environmental Science & Policy, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review, 72(1), 107–114.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy making in three modes. California Management Review, 16(2), 44–53.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., Lampel, J. B., & Koch, R. (2009). Strategy Safari: The Complete Guide Through the Wilds of Strategic Management. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state: Co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment & Urbanization, 20(2): 339–360.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 739–777.Google Scholar
Mogstad, A., Høiseth, M., & Pettersen, I. N. (2018). Co-creation in public service innovation: A review of how to encourage employee engagement in co-creation. DS 91: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, August 14–17, 2018. www.designsociety.org/publication/40907/Co-creation+in+Public+Service+Innovation%3A+A+review+of+how+to+encourage+employee+engagement+in+co-creationGoogle Scholar
Molen, F., Puente-Rodríguez, D., Swart, J. A., & Windt, H. J. (2015). The co-production of knowledge and policy in coastal governance: Integrating mussel fisheries and nature restoration. Ocean & Coastal Management, 106, 49–60.Google Scholar
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, M. H. (2000). Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, non-profit, and governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 183–204.Google Scholar
Morales, L. & Giugni, M. (eds.). (2016). Social Capital, Political Participation and Migration in Europe: Making Multicultural Democracy Work? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. & Cook, B. (2014). New Public Governance: A Regime-Centered Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morris, P., O’Neill, F., Armitage, A., Lane, R., Symons, J., Dalton, E., Gaines, M., Katz, A., & Reed, J. (2007). Moving from tokenism to co-production: Implications of learning from patient and community voices in developing patient centred professionalism. Conference paper presented at Professional Lifelong Learning: Critical Debates about Professionalism Conference. University of Leeds. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/48170935/Moving_from_tokenism_to_co-production_im20160819-19998-obgwzp.pdf?1471601982=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DMoving_from_tokenism_to_co_production_im.pdf&Expires=1599677177&Signature=G4xEe66Vx6uGm5-2KNhtbXn7arE423WF5N04ya6oB5SYfGNpZkaC~vKna8rkbIzU8bMTwhSphQWE7mZhR39Bo7aaWQ9LxQWPUZGVyAQXkBKwrileATDbJsoBHCoS86w~wFRC8l-rwxSBLGu-FF-XUQPGNd00YAfjTSTeySqdo6WtfKJIrdsIxHEC2p-sRAYQNlHeOrhnqO097fR4yRCYOaSfyRvAc6flxYOo2bYGHhZ-S~Y6lYZb3BUGfRAlyUOgv6CDkWPEDVJ1-4dhyOzXqiFnq3A66ccp5jmCOmc4p5zh6YqkANFDaYPCIdFdtA9zSZvfZVBWLj31XxKCl~xAbg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZAGoogle Scholar
Morse, R. S. (2010). Integrative public leadership: Catalyzing collaboration to create public value. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 231–245.Google Scholar
Mosquera, J. (2018). The power of co-creation in redesigning Valencia’s waterfront. Community, Culture, Economy, Cooperative City. https://cooperativecity.orgGoogle Scholar
Moss, T., Medd, W., Guy, S., & Marvin, S. (2009). Organising water: The hidden role of intermediary work. Water Alternatives, 2(1), 16–33.Google Scholar
Mouritzen, P. E. & Svara, J. H. (2002). Leadership at the Apex: Politicians and Administrators in Western Local Governments. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington D.C. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(2), 164–188.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2006). Europe’s populist surge: A long time in the making. Foreign Affairs, 95(6), 25–30.Google Scholar
Mulder, I. (2012). Living labbing the Rotterdam way: Co-creation as an enabler for urban innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 39–43.Google Scholar
Munck, R. (1993). After the transition: Democratic disenchantment in Latin America. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 55, 7–19.Google Scholar
Munoz, S., Steiner, A., & Farmer, J. (2014). Processes of community-led social enterprise development: Learning from the rural context. Community Development Journal, 50(3), 478–493.Google Scholar
Nabatchi, T. & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of co-production. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776.Google Scholar
Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., & Chen, M. (2007). What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 935–955.Google Scholar
Nalmpantis, D., Roukouni, A., Genitsaris, E., Stamelou, A., & Naniopoulos, A. (2019). Evaluation of innovative ideas for public transport proposed by citizens using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). European Transport Research Review, 11(1), 22.Google Scholar
Nambisan, S. (2009). Platforms for collaboration. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7(3), 44–49.Google Scholar
Nambisan, S. & Nambisan, P. (2013). Engaging Citizens in Co-Creation of Public Services: Lessons Learned and Best Practices. Washington D.C.: The IBM Center for the Business of Government.Google Scholar
Nambisan, S. & Nambisan, P. (2008). How to profit from a better virtual customer environment. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(3), 53–61.Google Scholar
Naurin, D. (2007). Deliberation Behind Closed Doors: Transparency and Lobbying in the European Union. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K. M., & Lazer, D. M. J. (2018). Politics with the People: Building a Directly Representative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nederhand, J. & Meerkerk, I. (2017). Activating citizens in Dutch care reforms: Framing new co-production roles and competences for citizens and professionals. Policy & Politics, 46(4), 533–550.Google Scholar
Needham, C. (2008). Realising the potential of co-production: Negotiating improvements in public services. Social Policy and Society, 7(2), 221–231.Google Scholar
Nelimarkka, M., Nonnecke, B., Krishnan, S., Aitamurto, T., Catterson, D., Crittenden, C., Garland, C., Gregory, C., Huang, C. C., Newsom, G., Patel, J., Scott, J., & Goldberg, K. (2014). Comparing three online civic engagement platforms using the “spectrum of public participation” framework. In Proceedings of the Oxford Internet, Policy, and Politics Conference (IPP) (pp. 25–6).Google Scholar
Nemec, J., Mikušová Meričková, B., & Svidroňová, M. (2016). Social innovations on municipal level in Slovakia. European Commission – 7th Framework Programme, LIPSE or Learning from Innovation in Public Sector Environments. www.muni.cz/en/research/publications/1212675Google Scholar
Network of European Foundations (2017). Pooling Funds, Pooling Strengths: A Case Study of the European Programme for Integration and Migration. Brussels: Network of European Foundations.Google Scholar
Neulen, S. (2016). Co-Creation between Citizens and the Government Influence of Settings on Intention of Citizens to Join Co-Creation. University of Twente M.A. Thesis.Google Scholar
Newman, J. (2001). Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. (2012). Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612–629.Google Scholar
Niitamo, V., Kulkki, S., Eriksson, M., & Hribernik, K. A. (2006). State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs, 2006 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE), Milan, 1–8, DOI: 10.1109/ICE.2006.7477081. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7477081Google Scholar
Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy & Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine, Atherton.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, B. (2002). Trust: Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revised. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (1999). Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OECD (2017). Fostering Innovation in the Public Sector. Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270879-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2011). Together for Better Public Services: Partnering with Citizens and Civil Society, OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264118843-en.Google Scholar
O’Flynn, J. (2007). From New Public Management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366.Google Scholar
Öberg, P. (2016). Deliberation. In Ansell, C. & Torfing, J., eds., Handbook on Theories of Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 179–187.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130.Google Scholar
Oksman, V., Väätänen, A., & Ylikauppila, M. (2014). Co-creation of sustainable smart cities: Users, participation and service design. In the 8th International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies, UBICOMM 2014. International Academy, Research, and Industry Association, 189–95. www.thinkmind.org/download.php?articleid=ubicomm_2014_7_20_10039Google Scholar
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.Google Scholar
Osborne, S. P. & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation in public services: Engaging with risk. Public Money and Management, 31(1), 4–6.Google Scholar
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653.Google Scholar
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158.Google Scholar
Osborne, S. P. & Strokosch, K. (2013). It takes two to tango? Understanding the co‐production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspective. British Journal of Management, 24, 31–47.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1991). Rational choice theory and institutional analysis: Toward complementarity. American Political Science Review, 85(1), 237–243.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Instutitions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. & Whitaker, G (1973). Does local community control of police make a difference? Some preliminary findings. American Journal of Political Science, 17(1), 48–76.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Parks, R. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Percy, S. L. (1978). The public service production process: A framework for analyzing police services. Policy Studies Journal, 7, 381–389.Google Scholar
O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45–52.Google Scholar
Page, S. (2010). Integrative leadership for collaborative governance: Civic engagement in Seattle. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 246–263.Google Scholar
Painter, M. & Peters, B. G. (2010). Administrative traditions in comparative perspective: Families, groups and hybrids. In Painter, M. & Peters, B. G., eds., Tradition and Public Administration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
Palumbo, R., Vezzosi, S., Picciolli, P., Landini, A., Annarumma, C., & Manna, R. (2018). Fostering organizational change through co-production: Insights from an Italian experience. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 15(3), 371–391.Google Scholar
Pan, S. L. & Leidner, D. E. (2003). Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12(1), 71–88.Google Scholar
Pappers, J., Keserü, I., & Macharis, C. (2019). Using co-creation methods to solve mobility problems in Brussels. In Real Corp 2019 – Is this the Real World? Perfect Smart Cities vs. Real Emotional Cities. Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society 993–9. CORP–Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning. www.corp.at/archive/CORP2019_103.pdfGoogle Scholar
Park, S. & Berry, F. (2014). Successful diffusion of a failed policy: The case of pay-for-performance in the US Federal Government. Public Management Review, 16(6), 763–781.Google Scholar
Parker, G. & Alstyne, M. (2018). Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Science, 64(7), 2973–3468.Google Scholar
Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B, Whitaker, G. P., & Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as co-producers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1111.Google Scholar
Parrado, S., Ryzin, G. G., Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2013). Correlates of co-production: Evidence from a five-nation survey of citizens. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 85–112.Google Scholar
Parry, K. W. & Bryman, A. (2006). Leadership in organizations. In Clegg, S., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. & Nord, W. R., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage Publications, pp. 447–468.Google Scholar
Paskaleva, K., Cooper, I., & Concilo, G. (2018). Co-producing smart city services: Does one size fit all? In Rodríquez Bolívar, M., ed., Smart Technologies for Smart Governments. Cham: Springer, pp. 123–158.Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revised. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 7–19.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2011). Essentials of Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2010). Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, C. L. & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Pedersen, A. R., Sehested, K., & Sørensen, E. (2011). Emerging theoretical understanding of pluricentric coordination in public governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(4), 375–394.Google Scholar
Pellicano, M., Calabrese, M., Loia, F., & Maione, G. (2018). Value co-creation practices in smart city ecosystem. Journal of Service Science and Management, 12(1), 34–57.Google Scholar
Percy, S. L. (1984). Citizen participation in the co-production of urban services. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 19(4), 431–446.Google Scholar
Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations, 23(4), 1102–1118.Google Scholar
Pestoff, V. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services: Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8(4), 503–519.Google Scholar
Pestoff, V. & Brandsen, T. (2008). Co-Production: The Third Sector Sector and the Delivery of Public Services. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pestoff, V., Osborne, S. P., & Brandsen, T. (2006). Patterns of co-production in public services. Public Management Review, 8(4), 591–595.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2010). Meta-governance and public management. In Osborne, S. P., ed., The New Public Governance? London: Routledge, pp. 52–67.Google Scholar
Petersen, O. H, Hjelmar, U., & Vrangbæk, K. (2017). Is contracting out still the great panacea? A systematic review of studies on economic and quality effects from 2000–2014. Social Policy and Administration, 51(2), 130–157.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 570–581.Google Scholar
Pharr, S. J., Putnam, R. D., & Dalton, R. J. (2000). A quarter century of declining confidence. Journal of Democracy, 11(2), 5–25.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. (2006). Growing pains: The sustainability of social enterprises. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 7(4), 221–230.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2011). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.Google Scholar
Pirinen, A. (2016). The barriers and enablers of co-design for services. International Journal of Design, 10(3), 27–42.Google Scholar
Plé, L. & Cáceres, R. C. (2010). Not always co‐creation: Introducing interactional co‐destruction of value in service‐dominant logic. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6) 430–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Continuity and Change in Public Policy and Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. & Hupe, P. (2011). Talking about government: The role of magic concepts. Public Management Review, 13(5), 641–658.Google Scholar
Poocharoen, O. O. & Ting, B. (2015). Collaboration, co-production, networks: Convergence of theories. Public Management Review, 17(4), 587–614.Google Scholar
Pope, J. G., Hegland, T. J., Ballesteros, M., Nielsen, K. N., & Rahikainen, M. (2019). Steps to unlocking ecosystem based fisheries management: Towards displaying the N dimensional potato. Fisheries Research, 209, 117–128.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. & Ramaswamy, V. (2002). The co-creation connection. Strategy+Business, 27, 50–61.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.Google Scholar
Pressman, J. L. & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Provan, K. G. & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public‐sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423.Google Scholar
Provan, K. G. & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–52.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (2010). Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Puerari, E., de Koning, J., Von Wirth, T., Karré, P., Mulder, I., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Co-creation dynamics in urban living labs. Sustainability, 10(6), 1893.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 28(4), 664–683.Google Scholar
Quick, K. S. (2017). Locating and building collective leadership and impact. Leadership, 13(4), 445–471.Google Scholar
Quick, K. S. & Feldman, M. S. (2011). Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(3), 272–290.Google Scholar
Radnor, Z., Osborne, S. P., Kinder, T., & Mutton, J. (2014). Operationalizing co-production in public services delivery: The contribution of service blueprinting. Public Management Review, 16(3), 402–423.Google Scholar
Ramaswamy, V. & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, 84, 196–205.Google Scholar
Rantamäki, N. J. (2017). Co-production in the context of Finnish social services and health care: A challenge and a possibility for a new kind of democracy. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(1), 248–264.Google Scholar
Rashman, L. & Hartley, J. (2002). Leading and learning? Knowledge transfer in the beacon council scheme. Public Administration, 80(3), 523–542.Google Scholar
Reich, R. B. (2012). Beyond Outrage: What Has Gone Wrong with Our Economy and Our Democracy, and How to Fix It. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Renn, O. (2008). Concepts of risk: An interdisciplinary review – Part 2: Integrative approaches. GAIA Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 17(2), 196–204.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Rittell, H. W. J. & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.Google Scholar
Roberts, N. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), 315–353.Google Scholar
Roberts, N. (2000). Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review 1(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Roberts, N. C. & King, P. J. (1996). Transforming Public Policy: Dynamics of Policy Entrepreneurship and Innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Lessons for guidelines for the diffusion of innovations. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 21(7), 324–328.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. (2011). Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, J. & Painter, G. (2019). From citizen control to co-production: Moving beyond a linear conception of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(3), 335–347.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, S. J. & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rossi, U. (2004). The multiplex city: The process of urban change in the historic centre of Naples. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(2), 156–169.Google Scholar
Rutter, D., Manley, C., Weaver, T., Crawford, M. J., & Fulop, N. (2004). Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London. Social Science & Medicine 58(10), 1973–1984.Google Scholar
Ryan, B. (2012). Co-production: Option or obligation? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(3), 314–324.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. & Weible, C. M. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In Sabatier, P. A., ed., Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge, pp. 189–220.Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F. & Zeitlin, J. (eds.). (2010). Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, E. B. N. (2000). Generative tools for co-designing. In Scrivener, S. A. R., Ball, L. J. & Woodcock, A., eds., Collaborative Design. London: Springer, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Sanders, E. B. N. & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
Sarason, S. (1974), The Creation of Settings and the Future Societies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Schachter, H. L. & Aliaga, M. (2003). Educating administrators to interact with citizens: A research note. Public Organisation Review, 3(4), 433–442.Google Scholar
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Introduction: The problem-solving capacity of multi-level governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 520–538.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27–53.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1993). Games in Hierarchies and Networks: Analytical and Empirical Approaches to the Study of Governance Institutions. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Schillemans, T. (2008). Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: The horizontal accountability of agencies. Public Organization Review, 8(2): 175.Google Scholar
Schillemans, T., Van Twist, M., & Vanhommerig, I. (2013). Innovations in accountability: Learning through interactive, dynamic, and citizen-initiated forms of accountability. Public Performance and Management Review, 36(3): 407–435.Google Scholar
Schlappa, H. & Imani, Y. (2018). Who is in the lead? New perspectives on leading service co-production. In Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B. & Steen, T., eds., Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 99–108.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and “throughput”. Political Studies, 61(1), 2–22.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the century of corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1), 85–131.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. & Rein, M. (1995). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Scott, D. M. (2015). The New Rules of Marketing and PR: How to Use Social Media, Online Video, Mobile Applications, Blogs, News Releases, and Viral Marketing to Reach Buyers Directly. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sedelmeier, U. (2014). Anchoring democracy from above? The European Union and democratic backsliding in Hungary and Romania after accession. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 105–121.Google Scholar
Sele, K. & Grand, S. (2016). Unpacking the dynamics of ecologies of routines: Mediators and their generative effects in routine interactions. Organization Science, 27(3), 722–738.Google Scholar
Self, R. O. (2005). American Babylon: Race and the Struggle for Postwar Oakland. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sell, M., Vihinen, H., Gabiso, G., & Lindström, K. (2018). Innovation platforms: A tool to enhance small-scale farmer potential through co-creation. Development in Practice, 28(8), 999–1011.Google Scholar
Serrat, O. (2010). Design thinking. Available at: www.adb.org/documents/information/knowledge-solutions/design-thinking.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sharp, E. B. (1980). Toward a new understanding of urban services and citizen participation: The co-production concept. The American Review of Public Administration, 14(2), 105–118.Google Scholar
Shinya, Y. (2017). ‘I-nnovate for tomorrow’: Co-creating solutions together with the Sudanese children. UNICEF Stories of Innovation, www.unicef.org/innovation/stories/innovate-creating-solutions-with-sudanese-children, visited December 23, 2019.Google Scholar
Siebers, V. & Torfing, J. (2018). Co-creation as a new form of citizen engagement: Comparing Danish and Dutch experiences at the local government level. International Public Management Review, 18(2), 187–208.Google Scholar
Silvia, C. & McGuire, M. (2010). Leading public sector networks: An empirical examination of integrative leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 264–277.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Skelcher, C. & Torfing, J. (2010). Improving democratic governance through institutional design: Civic participation and democratic ownership in Europe. Regulation and Governance, 4(1), 71–91.Google Scholar
Skilton, P. F. & Dooley, K. J. (2010). The effects of repeat collaboraton on creative abrasion. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 118–134.Google Scholar
Smith, P. H. & Ziegler, M. R. (2008). Liberal and illiberal democracy in Latin America. Latin America Politics and Society, 50(1), 31–57.Google Scholar
Smits, R. & Kuhlmann, S. (2004). The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1–2), 4–32.Google Scholar
Sol, J., Beers, P. J., & Wals, A. E. (2013). Social learning in regional innovation networks: Trust, commitment and reframing as emergent properties of interaction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 35–43.Google Scholar
Sopjani, L., Hesselgren, M., Ritzén, S., & Janhager Stier, J. (2017). Co-creation with diverse actors for sustainability innovation. In 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED17 (Vol. 8). www.designsociety.org/publication/39864/Co-creation+with+diverse+actors+for+sustainability+innovationGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, E. (2020). Interactive Political Leadership: The Role of Politicians in the Age of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. (2014). Conflict as a driver of pluricentric coordination. Planning Theory, 13(2), 152–169.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. (2012). Measuring the accountability of collaborative innovation. The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 2.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2020). Radical and disruptive answers to downstream problems in collaborative governance? Public Management Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2019). Designing institutional platforms and arenas for interactive political leadership. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1443–1463.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2018). Co-initiation of collaborative innovation in urban spaces. Urban Affairs Review, 54(2), 388–418.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2017). Metagoverning collaborative innovation in governance networks. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 826–839.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2012). Introduction: Collaborative innovation in the public sector. In Torfing, J., ed., Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration and Society, 43(8), 842–868.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2007). Theories of Democratic Network Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2005). Network governance and post-liberal democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(2), 197–237.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2003). Network politics, political capital, and democracy. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(6), 609–634.Google Scholar
Spillane, J. P. & Diamond, J. B. (2007). Distributed Leadership in Practice. Cheltenham: Hawker Brownlow Education.Google Scholar
Spinosa, C., Flores, F., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1997). Disclosing New Worlds: Entrepreneurship, Democratic Action and the Cultivation of Solidarity. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stangel, M. & Szóstek, A. (2015). Empowering citizens through participatory design: A case study of Mstów, Poland. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, 8(1), 47–58.Google Scholar
Star, S. L. & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.Google Scholar
Steen, T., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). The dark side of co-creation and co-production: Seven evils. In Brandsen, T., Steen, T. & Verschuere, B., eds., Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 284–293.Google Scholar
Steen, M., Manschot, M., & De Koning, N. (2011). Benefits of co-design in service design projects. International Journal of Design, 5(2), 53–60.Google Scholar
Steen, T. & Tuurnas, S. (2018). The roles of the professional in co-production and co-creation processes. In Brandsen, T., Steen, T. & Verschuere, B., eds., Co-Production and Co-creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 80–92.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. A., & Longstreth, F. (1992). Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steunenberg, B. (2000). Constitutional change in the European Union. In Wagenaar, H. ed., Government institutions: Effects, changes and normative foundations. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 89–108.Google Scholar
Steyaert, P. & Jiggins, J. (2007). Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: A synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(6), 575–586.Google Scholar
Stickdorn, M. & Schneider, J. (2011). This Is Service Design Thinking: Basics, Tools, Cases. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.Google Scholar
Stiles, K. (2002). International support for NGOs in Bangladesh: Some unintended consequences. World Development, 30(5), 835–846.Google Scholar
Stoker, G. (2019). Can the governance paradigm survive the rise of populism? Policy & Politics, 47(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
Stoker, G. (2011). Anti-politics in Britain. In Heffernan, R., Cowley, P. & Hay, C., eds., Developments in British politics 9. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 152–173.Google Scholar
Stoker, G. (2006a). Explaining political disenchantment: Finding pathways to democratic renewal. The Political Quarterly, 77(2), 184–194.Google Scholar
Stoker, G. (2006b). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.Google Scholar
Stoker, G. & John, P. (2009). Design experiments: Engaging policy makers in the search for evidence about what works. Political Studies, 57(2), 356–373.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. C. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 315–325.Google Scholar
Stoltz, P. G. (1997). Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Stonecash, J. M., Brewer, M. D., & Mariani, M. D. (2003). Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. New York: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Straus, D. (2002). How to Make Collaboration Work: Powerful Ways to Build Consensus, Solve Problems, and Make Decisions. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Svara, J. H. (2001). The myth of the dichotomy: Complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 176–183.Google Scholar
Sześciło, D. (2018). Legal dilemmas of co-production and co-creation. In Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B. & Steen, T., eds., Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 137–144.Google Scholar
Tait, L. & Lester, H. (2005). Encouraging user involvement in mental health services. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 11(3), 168–175.Google Scholar
Teder, M. E. (2018). Placemaking as co-creation: Professional roles and attitudes in practice. CoDesign, 15(4), 289–307.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (1982). How the law thinks: Towards a constructivist epistemology. Law and Society Review, 23(5), 727–757.Google Scholar
Tisdall, C. (2015). The Transformation of Services for Young People in Surrey County Council. Birmingham: Governance International.Google Scholar
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B. & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary: Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687.Google Scholar
Toots, M., McBride, K., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2017). Open data as enabler of public service co-creation: Exploring the drivers and barriers. In E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM), 2017 Conference for (pp. 102–12). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8046277Google Scholar
Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Torfing, J. (2016). Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Torfing, J. & Ansell, C. (2017). Strengthening political leadership and policy innovation through the expansion of collaborative forms of governance. Public Management Review, 19(1), 37–54.Google Scholar
Torfing, J., Krogh, A. H., & Ejrnæs, A. (2020). Measuring and assessing the effects of collaborative innovation in crime prevention. Policy & Politics. /doi.org/10.1332/030557320X15788414270675Google Scholar
Torfing, J., Krogh, A. H., & Ejrnæs, A. (2017). Samarbejdsdrevet innovation i kriminalpræventive indsatser: Slutrapport om sammenhængene mellem samarbejde, innovation og kriminalpræventiv effekt og måling heraf. Copenhagen: Det Kriminalpræventive Råd.Google Scholar
Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825.Google Scholar
Torfing, J. & Triantafillou, P. (2016). Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torfing, J. & Triantafillou, P. (2013). What’s in a name? Grasping New Public Governance as a political-administrative system. International Review of Public Administration, 18(2), 9–25.Google Scholar
Tortzen, A. (2018). Case study – Enhancing co-creation through linking leadership: The Danish ‘Zebra City’ project. In Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B. & Steen, T., eds., Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 112–114.Google Scholar
Trechsel, A. H. & Kriesi, H. (1996). Switzerland: The referendum system and initiative as a centrepiece of the political system. In Gallagher, M. & Uleri, P. V., eds., The Referendum Experience in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 185–208.Google Scholar
Trubek, D. M. & Trubek, L. G. (2006). New Governance & (and) legal regulation: Complementarity, rivalry, and transformation. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13, 539–548.Google Scholar
Tuurnas, S. (2015). Learning to co-produce? The perspective of public service professionals. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(7), 583–598.Google Scholar
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654–676.Google Scholar
Vamstad, J. (2012). Co-production and service quality: The case of cooperative childcare in Sweden. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations, 23(4), 1173–1188.Google Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G. & Immerwahr, S. (2007). Importance-performance analysis of citizen satisfaction surveys. Public Administration, 85(1), 215–226.Google Scholar
Vargo, S. L. & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23.Google Scholar
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–152.Google Scholar
Vesnic-Alujevic, L., Stoermer, E., Rudkin, J., Scapolo, F., & Kimbell, L. (2019). The Future of Government 2030+: A Citizen-Centric Perspective on New Government Models. EUR 29664 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, DOI: 10.2760/145751, JRC 115008.Google Scholar
Voet, J., Groeneveld, S., & Kuipers, B. S. (2014). Talking the talk or walking the walk? The leadership of planned and emergent change in a public organization. Journal of Change Management, 14(2), 171–191.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.Google Scholar
Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Flemig, S., Timeus, K., Tonurist, P., & Tummers, L. (2017a). Does co-creation impact public service delivery? The importance of state and governance traditions. Public Money & Management, 37(5), 365–372.Google Scholar
Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Timeus, K., Tonurist, P., & Tummers, L. (2017b). Changing public service delivery: Learning in co-creation. Policy and Society, 36(2), 178–194.Google Scholar
Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.Google Scholar
Voorberg, W., Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., Torfing, J., Tonurist, P., Kattel, R., Lember, V., Timeus, K., Nemec, J., Svidronova, M., Merickova, B. M., Gasco, M., Flemig, S., & Osborne, S. (n.d.). Co-creation and citizen involvement in social innovation: A comparative case study across 7 EU-countries. LIPSE research report #2. https://centerforborgerdialog.dk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Voorberg-2015-co-creation-and-citizen-involvement-comparative-study.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wang, W., Bryan-Kinns, N., & Ji, T. (2016). Using community engagement to drive co-creation in rural China. International Journal of Design, 10(1), 37–52.Google Scholar
Warburton, J. (2006). Volunteering in later life: Is it good for your health? Voluntary Action, 8(2), 3–15.Google Scholar
Warren, M. E. (2014). Accountability and democracy. In Bovens, M., Goodin, R. & Schillemans, T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–54.Google Scholar
Warren, M. E. (2009). Governance-driven democratization. Critical Policy Studies, 3(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
Warren, M. E. (2002). What can democratic participation mean today? Political Theory, 30(5), 677–701.Google Scholar
Warren, M. E. (1996). What should we expect from more democracy? Radically democratic responses to politics. Political Theory, 24(2), 241–270.Google Scholar
Warren, M. E. & Pearse, H. (2008). Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1995). Good Sewers Cheap. Agency–Customer Interactions in Low-Cost Urban Sanitation in Brazil. Washington D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Weber, E. P. (2009). Explaining institutional change in tough cases of collaboration: “Ideas” in the Blackfoot Watershed. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 314–327.Google Scholar
Welch, E. W. (2012). The rise of participative technologies in government. In Shareef, M. A., Archer, N., Dwivedi, Y. K., Mishra, A. & Pandey, S. K., eds., Transformational Government through eGov practice: Socioeconomic, Cultural, and Technological Issues. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 347–368.Google Scholar
Whiteley, P. F. (2010). Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world. Party Politics, 17(1), 21–44.Google Scholar
Wiewiora, A., Keast, R., & Brown, K. (2016). Opportunities and challenges in engaging citizens in the co-production of infrastructure-based public services in Australia. Public Management Review, 18(4), 483–507.Google Scholar
Wiktorska-Święcka, A. (2018). Co-creation of public services in Poland in Statu Nascendi: A case study on senior co-housing policy at the urban level. Polish Political Science Review, 6(2), 26–54.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, A., Mayer, M., & Ringler, V. (2014). Collaborative futures: Integrating foresight with design in large scale innovation processes-seeing and seeding the futures of Europe. Journal of Futures Studies, 18(4), 1–26.Google Scholar
Willams, B. N., Kang, S. C., & Johnson, J. (2016). (Co)-contamination as the dark side of co-production: Public value failures in co-production processes. Public Management Review, 18(5), 692–717.Google Scholar
Williams, P. (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration, 80(1), 103–124.Google Scholar
Windle, G. (2011). What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Reviews on Clinical Gerontology, 21(2), 152–169.Google Scholar
Windrum, P. & Koch, P. M. (eds.) (2008). Innovation in Public Sector Services: Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Windrum, P., Schartinger, D., Rubalcaba, L., Gallouj, F., & Toivonen, M. (2016). The co-creation of multi-agent social innovations: A bridge between service and social innovation Research. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(2), 150–166.Google Scholar
Won, K. K., Young-jun, K., & Jong-bae, K. (2018). The design of bus reservation system for the transportation vulnerable. RESNA Annual Conference. www.resna.org/sites/default/files/conference/2018/outcomes/Kiwon.htmlGoogle Scholar
Woo, J. J. (2019). The politics of policymaking: Policy co-creation in Singapore’s financial sector. Policy Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1634185Google Scholar
Yasuoka, M. & Sakurai, R. (2012). Out of Scandinavia to Asia: Adaptability of participatory design in culturally distant society. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases-Volume 2 (pp. 21–24). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2348144.2348152Google Scholar
Yin, L., Fassi, D., Cheng, H., Han, H., & He, S. (2017). Health co-creation in social innovation: Design service for health-empowered society in China. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S2293–S2303.Google Scholar
Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J. Jr, Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398–408.Google Scholar
Zanten, J. A. & Tulder, R. (2018). Multinational enterprises and the sustainable development goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3–4), 208–233.Google Scholar
Zittrain, J. L. (2006). The generative Internet. Harvard Law Review, 119(7), 1975–2040.Google Scholar