Book contents
- The Problem of Blame
- The Problem of Blame
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I The Permissibility of Blame
- Chapter 1 The Problem of Blame
- Chapter 2 The Structure of Basic Desert
- Chapter 3 Blame and the Reactive Attitudes
- Chapter 4 Solving the Problem of Blame
- Part II Prescriptive Preservationism and Eliminativism
- References
- Index
Chapter 2 - The Structure of Basic Desert
from Part I - The Permissibility of Blame
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 April 2022
- The Problem of Blame
- The Problem of Blame
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I The Permissibility of Blame
- Chapter 1 The Problem of Blame
- Chapter 2 The Structure of Basic Desert
- Chapter 3 Blame and the Reactive Attitudes
- Chapter 4 Solving the Problem of Blame
- Part II Prescriptive Preservationism and Eliminativism
- References
- Index
Summary
In Chapter 2, I turn my focus to the desert-based desideratum for a normatively adequate account of reactive blame. I begin with an issue that often plays a central role in obscuring whether the problem of blame can be resolved, namely how we ought to understand the concept of basic desert. Adjacent to the problem of blame, debates about free will and moral responsibility often seem to bottom out in appeals to whether or not the account on offer can deliver basic desert of blame. However, little progress has been made in explicating precisely what basic desert of blame amounts to. I argue that once we have restricted our focus to reactive blame in particular, a clearer picture of basic desert emerges. I go on to offer an analysis of basic desert of reactive blame which I call the fittingness account, and argue that it can provide the first step in resolving the problem of blame.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Problem of BlameMaking Sense of Moral Anger, pp. 40 - 57Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022