References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2024
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Power and InequalityA Reformist Perspective, pp. 285 - 302Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Abbate, L. (2017). La lista. Il ricatto alla Repubblica di Massimo Carminati, Milano: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Almerighi, M. (2006). Petrolio e potere, Roma: Editori Riuniti; II ed., Roma: Castelvecchi, 2014.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism, London and New York: Verso; new ed., 1991; Italian transl., Comunità immaginate, Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2018.Google Scholar
Anonymous. (1549). A discourse of the common weal of this realm of England, new ed. by., E. Lamond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1893.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1948). The origins of totalitarianism, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Aristotle [c. 350 BC]. (1977). Politics, Loeb Classic Library, vol. 21, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. (1832). On the economy of machinery and manufactures, London: Charles Knight; repr. of the IV ed., (1835), New York: M. Kelley, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, P., Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnasco, A. (1994). Regioni, tradizione civica, modernizzazione italiana: un commento alla ricerca di Putnam. Stato e Mercato, 1, 93–103.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, A. (2013). Economie e società nello spazio: uno sguardo in Italia. In Antropocene: modifiche naturali ed entropiche del fragile equilibrio della terra, Atti dei convegni lincei, n. 278, Roma: Bardi, pp. 187–94.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, A. (2020). Relazione introduttiva. In Diseguaglianze e classi sociali. La ricerca in Italia e nelle democrazie avanzate, Atti dei convegni lincei, n. 337, Roma: Bardi, pp. 7–26.Google Scholar
Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure, San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. (1764). Dei delitti e delle pene, Livorno; repr. in F. Venturi, ed., Illuministi italiani. Tomo III. Riformatori lombardi piemontesi e toscani, Milano-Napoli: Ricciardi, 1958, pp. 27–105.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp; Italian transl., La società del rischio, Roma: Carocci, 2000.Google Scholar
Bekkouche, Y., Cagé, J. (2018). The price of a vote: evidence from France, 1993–2014, Working Paper no. 68, INET (available at www.ineteconomics.org/workingpapers).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1791). Panopticon or the inspection house, London: T. Payne; Italian transl., Panopticon ovvero la casa d’ispezione, Foucault M., M. Pierrot eds., Venezia: Marsilio, 1983.Google Scholar
Berik, G., Kongar, E., eds. (2021). The Routledge handbook of feminist economics, Abington and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A., Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property, New York: The Commerce Clearing House.Google Scholar
Bernstein, E. (1899). Die Vorraussetzungen des Sozialismus und die Aufgaben der Sozialdemokratie, Stuttgard: Dietz; English transl., Evolutionary Socialism, New York: Huebsch, 1909; repr. New York: Schocken, 1961.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1984). Dibattito sulla democrazia italiana. Il potere in maschera. La Stampa, 21 agosto.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1994). Destra e sinistra. Ragioni e significati di una distinzione politica, Roma: Donzelli; IV ed., 2004.Google Scholar
Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital. The degradation of work in the Twentieth century, New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Breglia, A. (1965). Reddito sociale, Sylos Labini, P. ed., Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Caffè, F. (1972). La strategia dell’allarmismo economico. Giornale degli economisti, 31(9–10), 692–99; repr. in Amari G. and N. Rocchi eds., Un economista per gli uomini comuni, Roma: Ediesse, 2007, pp. 97–103.Google Scholar
Cahuc, P., Zylberberg, A. (2016). Le négationnisme économique. Et comment s’en débarasser, Paris: Flammarion; Italian transl., Contro il negazionismo, Milano: Università Bocconi Editore, 2018.Google Scholar
Cairncross, J. (1974). Aftyer poligamy was made a sin. The social history of Christian polygamy, London: Routedge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Calogero, G. (1940). Manifesto del liberalsocialismo, repr. in Difesa del liberalsocialismo e altri saggi, Milano: Marzorati, 1972.Google Scholar
Calogero, G. (1942). L’ircocervo ovvero le due libertà; repr. in Difesa del liberalsocialismo e altri saggi, Milano: Marzorati, 1972, pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
Canetti, E. (1960). Masse und Macht, Hambourg: Claassen Verlag; Italian transl., Masse e potere, Milano: Adelphi, 1981; repr., 2015.Google Scholar
Cantillon, R. (1755). Essai sur la nature du commerce en général, London: Fletcher Gyles; repr. with English transl. Higgs H. ed., London: Macmillan, 1931; repr., New York: M. Kelley, 1964.Google Scholar
Carabelli, A., Parisi, D., Rosselli, A. (1999). Che’genere’ di economista?, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2001). Internet galaxy, Oxford: Oxford University Press; Italian transl., Galassia internet, Milano: Feltrinelli, 2002.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and scope. The dynamics of industrial capitalism, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chafuen, A. A. (1986). Christians for freedom. Late-Scholastic economics, San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. (1940). Toward a concept of workable competition. American Economic Review, 30, 241–56.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm, Economica, 4; repr. in Coase R. H., The firm, the market and the law, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988, pp. 33–55.Google Scholar
Colletti, L. (1974). Marxismo e dialettica, appendix to Intervista storico-filosofica, Roma-Bari: Laterza, pp. 63–113.Google Scholar
Collier, P. (2013). Exodus. How migration is changing our world, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Commissione parlamentare d’inchiesta sul caso Sindona (2005). Dossier Sindona, Milano: Kaos edizioni.Google Scholar
Consiglio superiore della magistratura (2015). Il sistema giudiziario italiano. Normativa in materia di ordinamento giudiziario e di organizzazione e funzionamento del C.S.M., Roma.Google Scholar
Constant, B. (1819). De la liberté des anciens comparée à celle des modernes; Italian transl., La libertà degli antichi, paragonata a quella dei moderni, Torino: Einaudi, 2001.Google Scholar
Corsi, M. (1984). Il sistema di fabbrica e la divisione del lavoro: il pensiero di Charles Babbage. Quaderni di storia dell’economia politica, 3, 111–23.Google Scholar
Corsi, M., D’Ippoliti, C., Lucidi, F. (2011). On the evaluation of economic research: the case of Italy. Economia politica, 3, 369–402.Google Scholar
Croce, B., Einaudi, L. (1957). Liberismo e liberalismo, Solari, P. ed., Milano-Napoli: Riccardo Ricciardi editore.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (2003). Postdemocrazia, Roma-Bari: Roma-Bari: Laterza; English transl., Post-Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (2013). Making capitalism fit for society, Cambridge: Polity Press; Italian transl, Quanto capitalismo può sopportare la società, Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2014.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; Italian transl., Classi e conflitto di classe nella società industriale, Bari: Laterza, 1963; V ed., 1977.Google Scholar
Darvas, J., Steinmetz, K., Flowers, R. H., Gouni, L., Grieger, G., Köberlein, K., Pease, R. S., Roncaglia, A. (1991). Environmental, safety related and economic potential of fusion power. Plasma physics and controlled nuclear fusion research, vol. 3, IAEA, Wien, pp. 633–45.Google Scholar
David, P. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 75, 332–7.Google Scholar
Dickie, J. (2011). Blood Brotherhoods. The rise of the Italian mafias, London: Sceptre; Italian transl. Onorate società, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
D’Ippoliti, C. (2020). Democratizing the economics debate. Pluralism and research evaluation, Abington: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Ippoliti, C., Malaguti, M. C., Roncaglia, A. (2020). L’Unione Europea e l’euro: crescere o perire. Moneta e Credito, 73, 183–205.Google Scholar
D’Ippoliti, C., Roncaglia, A. (2011). L’Italia: una crisi nella crisi. Moneta e Credito, 64(255), 189–227.Google Scholar
Dobb, M., Sweezy, P., Takahashi, K., Hulton, R., Hill, C. (1954). The transition from feudalism to capitalism. A symposium, New York: Science and Society.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1980). Il nome della rosa, Milano: Bompiani; repr., Barcellona: Bibliotex, 2002.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, B., Ehrenreich, J. (1977). The professional-managerial class. Radical America, 11(2), 7–40 and 11(3), 7–24.Google Scholar
Eichner, A. S. (1976). The megacorp and oligopoly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Einaudi, L. (1949). Lezioni di politica sociale, Torino: Einaudi; repr., Milano: Vitale & Associati, 2002.Google Scholar
Elias, N. (1939). Über den prozess der Zivilisation, 2 vols., Basel: Hans zum Falken; Italian transl., Il processo di civilizzazione, Bologna: Il Mulino, 1988.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1982). Sour grapes. Utilitarianism and the genesis of wants. In Sen, A., Williams, B., pp. 219–38; Italian transl., L’uva acerba. L’utilitarismo e la genesi dei voleri. In ibid., pp. 271–95.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of post-industrial economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Federal Trade Commission Staff Report (1952). The international petroleum cartel, Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ferguson, A. (1767). An essay on the history of civil society, Edinburgh: A. Kinkaid & J. Bell.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T., Jorgensen, P., Chen, J. (2019). How money drives US congressional elections:linearmodels of money and outcomes. Preprint, Structural change and economic dynamics.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. Outline of an anarchist theory of knowledge, London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Fitoussi, J.-P., Sen, A., Stiglitz, J. (2009). Report by the Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris (www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm).Google Scholar
Foley, S., Karlsen, J. R., Putniņš, T. (2019). Sex, drugs and bitcoins: how much illegal activity is financed through cryptocurrencies?. Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1798–1853.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2004). Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France 1978–1979, Paris: Seuil-Gallimard; Italian transl., Nascita della biopolitica, Milano: Feltrinelli, 2005; UE Feltrinelli, III ed., 2017.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man, New York: Free Press; Italian transl., La fine della Storia e l’ultimo uomo, Milano: Rizzoli, 1992.Google Scholar
Furtado, C. (1964). Development and underdevelopment, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state, Boston: Houghton Mifflin; repr. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1967.Google Scholar
Galiani, F. (1751). Della moneta, Napoli: Giuseppe Raimondi; II ed., Napoli: Stamperia simoniana, 1780; repr., Milano: Feltrinelli, 1963.Google Scholar
Gauchet, M. (2020). Destra/sinistra. Storia di una dicotomia, new ed., Napoli: Diana edizioni.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press; II ed., 2006; repr. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1988). The interplay between institutional and material factors: the problem and its status, in Kregel, J. A., Matzner, E., Roncaglia, A., eds., Barriers to full employment, Houndmills-London: Macmillan, pp. 297–326.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1998). The third way, Cambridge: Polity Press; Italian transl., La terza via. Manifesto per la rifondazione della socialdemocrazia, Milano: Il Saggiatore, 1999.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. (1992). Revised class schema, London: Social and community planning research.Google Scholar
Graeber, D., Weingrow, D. (2021). The dawn of everything. A new history of humanity, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Sharfstein, D. (2013). The growth of finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27, 3–28.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. (1982). What’s the use of going to school? In Sen and Williams, 1982, pp. 261–78; Italian transl., A cosa serve andare a scuola? Il problema dell’educazione nell’utilitarismo e nella teoria dei diritti. In ibid., pp. 325–44.Google Scholar
Hall, P., Soskice, D., eds. (2001). Varieties of capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Han, B.-C. (2005). Was ist Macht?, Stuttgard: Phillip Reclam; English transl., What is power?, Cambridge: Polity press, 2019.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. (1962). Measurement of social power, opportunity costs and the theory of two-person bargaining games. Behavioral Science, 7, 67–80; partial repr. in Rothschild K., 1971, pp. 77–96.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von (1944). The road to serfdom, Chicago: Chicago University Press; repr. (with introduction by M. Friedman), 1994.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von (1973). Law, legislation and liberty, vol. 1, Rules and order, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von (1999). Good money. Part II. The standard, Kresge, S. ed., The collected works of F.A. Hayek, vol. 6, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heckman, J., Landersø, R. (2021). Lessons from Denmark about inequality and social mobility, Working Paper n. 28543, Cambridge (Mass.): National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Heckman, J., Moktan, S. (2018). Publishing and promotion in economics: the tyranny of the Top Five, Working Paper, INET (available at www.ineteconomics.org/workingpapers).Google Scholar
Heimans, J., Timms, H. (2018). New power; Italian transl., L’arte del potere nel XXI secolo, Torino: Einaudi, 2020.Google Scholar
Herodotus, [c. 430 BC] (2015). Historiae, Wilson, N. G. ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilferding, R. (1910,). Das Finanzkapital, Wien: Wiener Volksbuchhandlung Ignaz Brand.Google Scholar
Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1945). National power and the structure of foreign trade, Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press; repr. 1969; new ed., 1980.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1977). The passions and the interests, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1982). Rival interpretations of market society: civilizing, destructive, or feeble?. Journal of Economic Literature, 20, 1463–84.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The rhetoric of reaction, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press; Italian transl., Retoriche dell’intransigenza, Bologna: il Mulino, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan, London: Andrew Crooke; trad. it., Leviatano, Roma-Bari: Laterza, 1974.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1752). Political discourses, Edinburgh: A. Kincaid and A. Donaldson; rist. in Essays: moral, political, and literary, Miller E. F. ed., Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (2004). Who are we? The challenges to America’s national identity, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Iversen, T., Soskice, D. (2019). Democracy and prosperity: reinventing capitalism through a turbulent century, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Izzo, L., Pedone, A., Spaventa, L., Volpi, F. (1969). Rapporto del gruppo di studio sui problemi di analisi economica e politica economica a breve termine, mimeo, Roma: Isco; then published as Il controllo dell’economia nel breve termine, II ed., Milano: Franco Angeli, 1972.Google Scholar
Jagose, A. (1996). Queer theory: an introduction, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Jossa, B. (2010). Esiste un’alternativa al capitalismo? L’impresa democratica e l’attualità del marxismo, Roma: Manifestolibri.Google Scholar
Jouvenel, B. de (1945). Du pouvoir. Histoire naturelle de sa croissance, Geneva: Les editions du cheval ailé; English edn., On power. Its nature and the history of its growth, New York: Viking Press, 1948; paperback edn., Boston: Beacon Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 313–27.Google Scholar
Kalantzakos, S. (2018). China and the geopolitics of rare earths, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalecki, M. (1943). Political aspects of full employment. Political Quarterly, 14, 322–31; repr. in Kalecki M., Selected essays on the dynamics of the capitalist economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–45.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1785). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoc; Italian transl. Fondazione della metafisica dei costumi, in Scritti morali, Torino: Utet, 1995.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., Nye, J. S. (1987). Power and interdependence revisited. International Organization, 41(4), 725–53.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on prabability, London: Macmillan; repr. in J. M. Keynes, Collected writings, vol. 8, London: Macmillan, 1973.Google Scholar
Khanna, P. (2016). Connectography, New York: Random House; Italian transl., Connectography, Roma: Fazi.Google Scholar
Kregel, J. (2022). La crisi finanziaria e le crisi prossime venture, mimeo, Conference on La crisi e le crisi, April 28, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Roma.Google Scholar
Kreps, D. M. (1990). Game theory and economic modelling, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lazonick, W., Shin, J.-S. (2020). Predatory value extraction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leibenstein, H. (1966). Allocative efficiency vs. ‘X-efficiency’. American Economic Review, 56, 392–415.Google Scholar
Lepenies, W. (1990). Les trois cultures. Entre science et littérature, l’avènement de la sociologie, Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
Levy, D. M. (2001). How the dismal science got its name, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lindert, P. H. (2004). Growing public, 2 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1690). Two treatises of government, London: Awnsham and John Churchill; repr. London: J. M. Dent (Everyman’s Library), 1975.Google Scholar
Lucarelli, S., Perone, G. (2018). La loggia P2 e il mondo finanziario italiano. Alcune evidenze empiriche basate sulla social network analysis. Moneta e Credito, 71(284), 369–90.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (1974). Power. A radical view, London: Macmillan; II ed., Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
MacLean, N. (2017). Democracy in chains: the deep history of the radical right’s stealth plan for America, New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Maffei, L. (2021). Ai bambini bisogna dare una stessa linea di partenza. Avvenire, June 17, p. 3.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1986–2012). The sources of social power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1. A history of power from the beginning to AD 1760, 1986; 2. The rise of classes and nation states, 1760–1914, 1993; 3. Global empires and revolution, 1890–1945, 2012; 4. Globalizations, 1945–2011, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchionatti, R. (2020). Un classico di sorprendente attualità. Postfazione to the Italian transl. of Sahlins, 1972, pp. 439–52.Google Scholar
Marris, R. (1964). The economic theory of ‘managerial’ capitalism, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1844). Zur Kritick des Hegel’schen Rechts-Philosophie. Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher, Paris, 2, 71–85; Italian transl., Critica della filosofia del diritto di Hegel. Introduzione. In Annali franco-tedeschi, Bravo G. M. ed., Milano: Edizioni del Gallo, 1965, pp. 124–42.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1859). Zur Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie, Berlin: Dietz; trad. it., Per la critica dell’economia politica, Roma: Editori riuniti, 1957; II ed., 1969.Google Scholar
Marx, K., [1844] (1932). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844. In Karl Marx – Friedrich Engels Historisc-kritische Gesamtausgabe, Adoratskij, V. ed., Berlin: Marx-Engels Gesamtausgabe (MEGA); Italian transl., Manoscritti economico-filosofici del 1844, Torino: Einaudi, 1949, II ed., 1968.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1867–94). Das Kapital, 3 vols., Hamburg: O. Meissner; Italian transl., Il capitale, Roma: Editori Riuniti, 1968.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1878). Kritik des Gothaer Programms. Die Neue Zeit, 18; Italian transl., Critica del programma di Gotha, Roma: Samonà e Savelli, 1968. [English transl. in Marx K., F. Engels, Basic writings on politics and philosophy, Feuer L. S. ed., Doubleday, 1959, pp. 153–173.]Google Scholar
Mazzoni, A., Malaguti, M. C. (2019). Diritto del commercio internazionale. Fondamenti e prospettive, Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M., Powers, B. R. (1986). The global village, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1935). Sex and temperament in three primitive societies, New York: William Morrow; II ed., 1950; III ed., 1963; Italian transl., Sesso e temperamento, Milano: il Saggiatore, 2020.Google Scholar
Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press – Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Milanovic, B. (2019). Capitalism, alone, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press – Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty, London: John W. Park; repr. in Utilitarianism, liberty, representative government, London: Dent, 1910.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism. Fraser’s Magazine, 64, 383–4; repr. in Mill J. S. and J. Bentham, Utilitarianism and other essays, London: Dent, 1910, pp. 272–338.Google Scholar
Minsky, H. P. (1975). John Maynard Keynes, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, H. P. (1982). Can ‘It’ happen again? Essays on instability and finance, Armonk: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Minsky, H. P. (1986). Stabilizing an unstable economy, New Haven: Yale University Press; new ed., New York: McGraw Hill, 2008.Google Scholar
Minsky, H. P. (1990). Schumpeter e la finanza. In Biasco, S., Roncaglia, A., Salvati, M., eds., Istituzioni e mercato nello sviluppo economico, Roma-Bari: Laterza, pp. 117–32.Google Scholar
Minsky, H. P. (2013). Ending poverty: jobs, not welfare, Annandale-on-Hudson: Levy Economics Institute,.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. (2002). Machine dreams. Economics becomes a cyborg science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P., Plehwe, D., eds. (2009). The road from Mont Pèlerin: the making of the neoliberal thought collective, Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F., Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48, 161–97.Google Scholar
Montanaro, E., Tonveronachi, M. (2012). Financial re-regulation at a crossroad: how the European experience strengthens the case for a radical reform built on Minsky’s approach. PSL Quarterly Review, 65(163), 335–83.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C.-L. de Secondat de (1748). De l’esprit des lois, 2 vols., Genève: Barillot et Fils; English transl., The spirit of the laws, Cohler A. M., B. C. Miller, H. S. Stone eds., Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
More, T. (1516). Utopia, Lovanio: T. Martens; Italian transl., Utopia, Torino: Utet, 1971.Google Scholar
Mosse, G. L. (1980). Masses and man. Nationalist and Fascist perceptions of reality, New York: Howard Ferting.Google Scholar
Neale, A. D. (1970). The antitrust laws of the U.S.A., II ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. (1995). Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 48–90.Google Scholar
Noble, D. (2011). Forces of production. Social history of industrial automation, Abingdon: Routledge; II ed., 2017.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1999). Women and human development: the capabilities approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, J. (1990). Bound to lead: the changing nature of American power, New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
Onfray, M. (2019). Théorie de la dictature, Paris: Robert Laffont; Italian transl., Teoria della dittatura, Milano: Ponte alle grazie, 2020.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1930). La rebelión de las masas, Madrid: Ediciones de la Revista de Occidente.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1896). La courbe de la répartition de la richesse. In Recueil publié par la Faculté de Droit del’Université de Lausanne à l’occasion de l’Exposition nationale de 1896, pp. 373–87; Italian transl., La curva di ripartizione della ricchezza. In Corsi, 1995, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
Pease, R. S., Darvas, J., Steinmetz, K., Flowers, R. H., Gouni, L., Grieger, G., Köberlein, K., Roncaglia, A. (1989). Environmental, safety-related and economic potential of fusion power, Main report by the EEF Study Group, Warrington (UK): Progressive Engineering Consultants.Google Scholar
Perroux, F. (1950). The domination effect and modern economic theory. Social research, 17, 188–206; repr. in Rothschild, 1971, pp. 56–73.Google Scholar
Petty, W. (1690). Political Arithmetick, London: Robert Clavel and Henry Mortlock; repr. in Petty W., Economic writings, Hull C. ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899, pp. 233–313.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2013). Le capital au XXIe siècle, Paris: Editions du Seuil; English transl., Capital in the twenty-first century, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 2014; Italian transl., Il capitale nel XXI secolo, Milano: Bompiani, 2014.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2019). Capital et idéologie, Paris: Editions du Seuil; Italian transl., Capitale e ideologia, Milano: La nave di Teseo, 2020.Google Scholar
Piselli, F., ed. (1995). Reti. L’analisi di network nelle scienze sociali, Roma: Donzelli; II ed., 2001.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, A. (1963). Le organizzazioni, il potere e i conflitti di classe. Introduzione. In Dahrendorf 1959, Italian transl., pp. v–xxxv,Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1968). Primitive, archaic and modern economies. Essays of Karl Polanyi, Dalton G. ed., New York: Doubleday; repr. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1944–45). The poverty of historicism. Economica, 11, 86–103 and 119–37; 12, 69–89; repr., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1945). The open society and its enemies, 2 vols., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pownall, T. (1776). A letter from Governor Pownall to Adam Smith, L.L.D. F.R.S., being an examination of several points of doctrine, laid down in his ‘Inquiry in to the nature and causes of the wealth of nations’, London; repr., New York: Augustus MK. Kelley, 1967; repr. in A. Smith, Correspondence, Mossner E.C., I.S. Ross eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977, pp. 337–76.Google Scholar
Prebish, R. (1950). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American communities, New York: Touchstone – Simon & Schuster; Italian transl., Capitale sociale e individualismo, Bologna: il Mulino, 2004.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation, John Murray, London; repr. as vol. 1 in Works and correspondence, Sraffa P. ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951–55.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (1977). Petty: la nascita dell’economia politica. Milano: Etas Libri; English transl., Petty. The origins of political economy. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 1985.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (1983). L’economia del petrolio. Roma-Bari: Laterza. English transl., The international oil market. London: Macmillan 1985.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (1989). Research in fusion as investment. Giornale degli economisti, 48(7–8), 293–307.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (2001). La ricchezza delle idee, Roma-Bari: Laterza; IV ed., 2009; English transl, The wealth of ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (2010). Economisti che sbagliano, Roma-Bari: Laterza; English transl., Why the economists got it wrong. The crisis and its cultural roots, London: Anthem press, 2010.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (2012). L’economia della P2. In Amari, G., Vinci, A., eds., Le notti della democrazia, Roma: Ediesse, pp. 97–101.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (2015). Institutions, resources and the common weal. In Baranzini, M., Rotondi, C., Scazzieri, R., eds., Resources, production and structural dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 259–78.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A., Villetti, R. (2007). Divisione del lavoro: capitalismo, socialismo, utopia. In Dosi, G., Marcuzzo, M. C., eds., L’economia e la politica. Saggi in onore di Michele Salvati, Bologna: il Mulino, pp. 265–83.Google Scholar
Rosselli, C., [1930] (1945). Socialismo liberale, Garosci A. ed., Roma-Firenze-Milano: Edizioni U; new ed., Torino: Einaudi, 1973; repr., 1997.Google Scholar
Rosselli, C. (2020). Scritti inediti di economia (1924–1927), Ghiandelli E. ed., Milano: Biblion.Google Scholar
Rossi, E. (1946). Abolire la miseria, La fiaccola; repr., Sylos Labini P. ed., Roma-Bari: Laterza, 1977.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. (1994). Adam Smith and the invisible hand. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, 84, 319–22.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E., (2001). Economic sentiments, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics, New York: de Gruyter; new ed., London: Routledge, 2017; Italian transl., L’economia dell’età della pietra, Milano: elèuthera, 2020.Google Scholar
Sales, I. (2021). La sfida di Falcone che tolse ai mafiosi l’antica impunità. Repubblica, March 23, pp. 14–5.Google Scholar
Salvaggiulo, G., ed. (2020). Io sono il potere. Confessioni di un capo di gabinetto, Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Salvati, M. (1967). Sviluppo economico e recessione nelle Relazioni della Banca d’Italia, Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1971). Understanding the Marxian notion of exploitation; a summary of the so-called transformation problem between Marxian values and competitive prices. Journal of Economic Literature, 9, 399–431.Google Scholar
Schmoller, G. (1914). On class conflict in general. American Journal of Sociology, 20, 504–31.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1908). Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie, Munich and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot; Italian transl., L’essenza e i principi dell’economia teorica, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy, New York: Harpers & Bro.; II ed., 1947; III ed., 1950.Google Scholar
Sen, A., Williams, B., eds. (1982). Utilitarianism and beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Italian transl., Utilitarismo e oltre, Milano: Mondadori, 1984, II ed., 1990.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In McGuire, C. B., Radner, C., eds., Decision and organisation, Amsterdam: North Holland,, pp. 161–76.Google Scholar
Sirianni, C. (1981). Classi, produzione e potere: un’analisi critica delle dimensioni utopistiche della teoria marxiana. Quaderni piacentini, 1, 57–85 and 2, 3–35.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments, London: A. Millar; Raphael D.D., A.L. Macfie eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell; Campbell R. H., A. S. Skinner eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1795). Essays on philosophical subjects, London: T. Cadell and W. Davies; Wightman W.P.D., J.C. Bryce eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1983). Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres, Bryce J. C. ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C. P. (1963). The two cultures and a second look, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spinelli, A., Rossi, E. (1944). Per un’Europa libera e unita. Progetto di un manifesto, Milano: Edizioni del Mondadori, 2006.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1924). Problemi di oggi e di domani. L’ordine nuovo, 1(3–4), April 1–15, 4 (letter to A. Gramsci published anonimously).Google Scholar
Stajano, C. (1991). Un eroe borghese. Il caso dell’avvocato Ambrosoli assassinato dalla mafia politica, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Steindl, J. (1952). Maturity and stagnation in American capitalism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell; repr., New York: Monthly Review Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Stern, N. (2008). The economics of climate change: the Stern review, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, N. (2009). A blueprint for a safer planet: how to manage climate change and create a new era of progress and prosperity, London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1987). The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization, 41(4), 551–74.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (1956). Oligopolio e progresso tecnico, Milano: Giuffrè; IV ed., Torino: Einaudi, 1967.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (1965). Le radici della mafia in Sicilia, Deposizione alla Commissione parlamentare d’inchiesta sul fenomeno della mafia in Sicilia, June 21; repr. in Sylos Labini, Problemi dello sviluppo economico, Bari: Laterza, 1970, pp. 179–90.Google Scholar
Tabellini, G. (2018). Prefazione all’edizione italiana. In Cahuc P., Zylberberg A., 2017, Italian transl. 2018.Google Scholar
Thaler, R., Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. (2017). Republic of equals. Predistribution and property-owning democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toporowski, J. (2000). The end of finance. Capital market inflation, financial derivatives and pension fund capitalism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Transparency International (2021). Corruption perceptions index 2020, www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzlGoogle Scholar
Trump, D. (2021). Speech to protesters, 6 January, transcript, https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-capitol-siege-media-e79eb5164613d6718e9f4502eG471f27.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on reports, accounting and management (1978a). Voting rights in major corporations, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on reports, accounting and management (1978b). Interlocking directorates among the major U.S. corporations, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2002). Mill on democracy. From the Athenian polis to representative government, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2020). Pochi contro molti. Il conflitto politico nel XXI secolo, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Van Horn, R., Mirowski, P. (2009). The rise of the Chicago school of economics and the birth of neoliberalism. In Mirowski and Plehwe, pp. 139–78.Google Scholar
Vanek, J. (1970). The general theory of labor managed market economies, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Villetti, R. (1978). Lavoro diviso e lavoro costrittivo. In Villetti, R., ed., Socialismo e divisione del lavoro, Quaderni di Mondoperaio, n. 8, Roma: Mondo Operaio-Edizioni Avanti!, pp. ix–lxxii; repr. in Villetti, 2021, pp. 31–80.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (1974, 1980, 1989). The modern world-system, vols. 1, 2, 3, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1904–5). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 20–21; II ed., in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Tübingen: Mohr, 1922; Italian transl., L’etica protestante e lo spirito del capitalismo, Firenze: Sansoni, 1965.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1919). Politik als Beruf, Wissenschaft als Beruf, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot; Italian transl., Il lavoro intellettuale come professione, Torino: Einaudi, 1948; repr. 1976.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1922a). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen: Mohr; Italian transl., Il metodo delle scienze storico-sociali, Torino: Einaudi, 1958; repr. Milano: Oscar Mondadori, 1980.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1922b). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 2 vols., Tübingen: Mohr; Italian transl., Economia e società, 2 vols., Milano: Edizioni di Comunità, 1962.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1923). Wirtschaftsgeschichte: Abriss der universalen Sozial- und Wirtschaftgeschichte, Berlin: Dunker & Humblot; Italian transl. of the III ed., Storia economica, Roma: Donzelli, 1993.Google Scholar
Young, M. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy 1870–2033. An essay on education and society, London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar