Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:56:12.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2018

Edited by
Theresa Squatrito ,
Oran R. Young ,
Andreas Follesdal  and
Geir Ulfstein
Theresa Squatrito
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Oran R. Young
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Andreas Follesdal
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Geir Ulfstein
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals , pp. 37 - 190
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance,” International Organization 54(3): 421–456.Google Scholar
Allee, Todd and Elsig, Manfred. 2015. “Dispute Settlement Provisions in PTAs: New Data and New Concepts,” in Dür, Andreas and Elsig, Manfred (eds.), Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 319–350.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2008. “Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context,” European Journal of International Relations 14(1): 33–63.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. and Helfer, Laurence R. 2010. “Nature or Nurture? Judicial Lawmaking in the European Court of Justice and the Andean Tribunal of Justice,” International Organization 64(4): 563–592.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. and Meunier, Sophie, 2006. “Nested and Overlapping Regimes in the Transatlantic Banana Trade Dispute,” Journal of European Public Policy 13(3): 362–382.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., Saldias, Osvaldo, and Helfer, Laurence R. 2012. “Transplanting the European Court of Justice: The Experience of the Andean Tribunal of Justice,” American Journal of Comparative Law 60(3): 629–694.Google Scholar
Arnold, Christian and Rittberger, Berthold. 2013. “The Legalization of Dispute Resolution in Mercosur,” Journal of Politics in Latin America 5(3): 97–132.Google Scholar
Bechtel, Michael M. and Sattler, Thomas. 2015. “What Is Litigation in the World Trade Organization Worth?,” International Organization 69(2): 375–403.Google Scholar
Bhala, Raj. 1999a. “The Myth About Stare Decisis and International Trade Law: Part One of a Trilogy,” American University International Law Review 14(4): 845–956.Google Scholar
Bhala, Raj. 1999b. “The Precedent Setters: De Facto Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication: Part Two of a Trilogy,” Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 9(1): 1–151.Google Scholar
Blackmore, Dana T. 2003. “Eradicating the Long-Standing Existence of a No-Precedent Rule in International Trade Law-Looking Toward Stare Decisis in WTO Dispute Settlement,” North Carolina Journal of International Law 29(3): 487–519.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P. 2005. “Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Complainants, Interested Parties, and Free Riders,” World Bank Economic Review 19(2): 287–310.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P. and Reynolds, Kara M. 2014. “Trade Flows and Trade Disputes,” Review of International Organizations 10(2): 145–177.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel. 2011. “The Remedy Gap: Institutional Design, Retaliation, and Trade Law Enforcement,” George Washington Law Review 80(1): 102–158.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel. 2013. “Pricing Compliance: When Formal Remedies Displace Reputational Sanctions,” Harvard International Law Journal 54(2): 259–314.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel and Chilton, Adam. 2014. “Supplying Compliance: Why and When the United States Complies with WTO Rulings,” Yale Journal of International Law 39(2): 201–247.Google Scholar
Broude, Tomer. 2007. “From Pax Mercatoria to Pax Europea: How Trade Dispute Procedures Serve the EC’s Regional Hegemony,” in Stephan, Paul B. (ed.), Economics of European Union Law. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 319–334.Google Scholar
Brutger, Ryan and Morse, Julia C. 2015. “Balancing Law and Politics: Judicial Incentives in WTO Dispute Settlement,” Review of International Organizations 10(2): 179–205.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. 2007. “Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade,” International Organization 61(04): 735–761.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2010. “The Politics of Judicial Economy at the World Trade Organization,” International Organization 64(2): 257–279.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2000. “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in GATT/WTO Disputes,” Fordham International Law Journal 24(1): 158–172.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2002. “Testing International Trade Law: Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement,” in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert Hudec. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 457–481.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2003. “Transatlantic Trade Conflicts and GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement,” in Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Transatlantic Economic Disputes: The EU, the US, and the WTO. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 465–486.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2006. “Three’s a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement,” World Politics 58(3): 446–77.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L., Raciborski, Rafal, and Reinhardt, Eric. 2008. “Does the Rule of Law Matter? The WTO and US Antidumping Investigations,” Working Paper, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L., Reinhardt, Eric, and Shaffer, Gregory. 2009. “Does Legal Capacity Matter? A Survey of WTO Members,” World Trade Review 8(4): 559–77.Google Scholar
Chase, Claude, Yanovich, Alan, Crawford, Jo-Ann, and Ugaz, Pamela. 2013. “Mapping of Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements-Innovative or Variations on a Theme?,” Staff Working Paper ERSD-2013–07, WTO Economic Research; Statistics Division, Geneva.Google Scholar
Creamer, Cosette D. 2017. “Partners in Compliance: The Political Cover of WTO Rulings,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 31–September 3, 2017.Google Scholar
Creamer, Cosette D. and Godzimirska, Zuzanna. 2016. “Deliberative Engagement Within the World Trade Organization: A Functional Substitute for Authoritative Interpretations,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 48(2): 413–461.Google Scholar
Davey, William J. 2005. “The WTO Dispute Settlement System: The First Ten Years,” Journal of International Economic Law 8(1): 17–50.Google Scholar
Davey, William J. 2006. “Dispute Settlement in the WTO and RTAs: A Comment,” in Bartels, Lorand and Ortino, Frederico (eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 343–357.Google Scholar
Davey, William J. 2009. “Compliance Problems in WTO Dispute Settlement,” Cornell International Law Journal 42(1): 119–128.Google Scholar
Davey, William J. 2014. “The WTO and Rules-Based Dispute Settlement: Historical Evolution, Operational Success, and Future Challenges,” Journal of International Economic Law 17(3): 679–700.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L. and Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett. 2009. “Who Files? Developing Country Participation in GATT/WTO Adjudication,” Journal of Politics 71(3): 1033–1049.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L. 2009. “Overlapping Institutions in Trade Policy,” Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 25–31.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L. 2012. Why Adjudicate? Enforcing Trade Rules in the WTO. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L. and Shirato, Yuki. 2007. “Firms, Governments, and WTO Adjudication: Japan’s Selection of WTO Disputes,” World Politics 59(2): 274–313.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Victoria and Lester, Simon. 2009. “Dispute Settlement,” in Lester, Simon and Mercurio, Bryan (eds.), Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 367–414.Google Scholar
Epstein, David, O’Halloran, Sharyn, and Widsten, Amy L. 2009. “Implementing the Agreement: Partisan Politics and WTO Dispute Settlement,” in Hartigan, James, C. (ed.), Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 121–138.Google Scholar
Faude, Benjamin. 2018. “How the Fragmentation of the International Judiciary Affects the Performance of International Judicial Bodies,” Chapter 7 in this volume.Google Scholar
Flett, James. 2015. “Referring PTA Disputes to the WTO Dispute Settlement System,” in Dür, Andreas and Elsig, Manfred (eds.), Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 555–578.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H. and Jeon, Sangick. 2008. “The Authority of Supreme Court Precedent,” Social Networks 30(1): 16–30.Google Scholar
Gantz, David A. 2013. Liberalizing International Trade After Doha: Multilateral, Plurilateral, Regional, and Unilateral Initiatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garcia Bercero, Ignacio. 2006. “Dispute Settlement in European Union Free Trade Agreements: Lessons Learned?,” in Bartels, Lorand and Mercurio, Bryan (eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 383–405.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom and McAdams, Richard. 2004. “Adjudicating in Anarchy: An Expressive Theory of International Dispute Resolution,” William and Mary Law Review 45(4): 1229–1339.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith L. and Steinberg, Richard H. 2008. “Negotiate or Litigate? Effects of WTO Judicial Delegation on US Trade Politics,” Law and Contemporary Problems 71(1): 257–282.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith and Martin, Lisa L. 2000. “Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note,” International Organization 54(3): 603–632.Google Scholar
Grinols, Earl L. and Perrelli, Roberto. 2002. “Politics, the WTO and Trade Disputes: Evidence from US Cases,” Pacific Economic Review 7(2): 335–357.Google Scholar
Grinols, Earl L. and Perrelli, Roberto. 2006. “The WTO Impact on International Trade Disputes: An Event History Analysis,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 88(4): 613–624.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. and Simmons, Beth A. 2002. “To Settle or Empanel? An Empirical Analysis of Litigation and Settlement at the World Trade Organization,” Journal of Legal Studies 31(1): 205–235.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. and Simmons, Beth A. 2005. “Power Plays and Capacity Constraints: The Selection of Defendants in WTO Disputes,” Journal of Legal Studies 34(2): 557–98.Google Scholar
Henckels, Caroline. 2008. “Overcoming Jurisdictional Isolationism at the WTO–FTA Nexus: A Potential Approach for the WTO,” European Journal of International Law 19(3): 571–599.Google Scholar
Hillman, Jennifer. 2009. “Conflicts Between Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO-What Should WTO Do,” Cornell International Law Journal 42(2): 193–208.Google Scholar
Hoff, Peter D., Raftery, Adrian E., and Handcock, Mark S. 2002. “Latent Space Approaches to Social Network Analysis,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 97(460): 1090–1098.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Tobias and Kim, Soo Yeon. 2009. “The Political Economy of Compliance in WTO Disputes,” Paper Presented at the International Political Economy Society Conference, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Horlick, Gary and Coleman, Judith. 2007. “The Compliance Problems of the WTO,” Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 24(1): 141–47.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2007. “International Trade: Dispute Settlement” in Guzman, Andrew T. and Sykes, Alan O., Research Handbook in International Economic Law. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 177–210.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C., Nordström, Håkan. et al. 1999. Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased? Vol. 2340. Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert. 1993. Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System. Salem, NH: Butterworth Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert. 1999. “The New Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of the First Three Years,” Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 8(1): 1–53.Google Scholar
Iida, Keisuke. 2004. “Is WTO Dispute Settlement Effective?,” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 10(2): 207–225.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H. 2004. “International Law Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: Obligation to Comply or Option to ‘Buy Out’?,” American Journal of International Law 98(1): 109–125.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H. 2006. Sovereignty, the WTO, and Changing Fundamentals of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Sarita. 2012. “Small States and Compliance Bargaining in the WTO: An Analysis of the Antigua–US Gambling Services Case,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 25(3): 367–385.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran and Namgung, Hyun. 2012. “Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Preferential Trade Agreements Democracy, Boilerplates, and the Multilateral Trade Regime,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 56(6): 1041–1068.Google Scholar
Johns, Leslie 2012. “Courts as Coordinators Endogenous Enforcement and Jurisdiction in International Adjudication.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 56(2): 257–289.Google Scholar
Johns, Leslie and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2009. “Dispute Settlement, Compliance and Domestic Politics,” in Hartigan, James C. (ed.), Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 139–163.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions,” International Organization 55(4): 761–799.Google Scholar
Krüger, Tilman. 2013. “Shaping the WTO’s Institutional Evolution: The EU as a Strategic Litigant in the WTO,” in Kochenov, Dimitry and Amtenbrink, Fabian (eds.), The European Union’s Shaping of the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–190.Google Scholar
Kwak, Kyung and Marceau, Gabrielle. 2006. “Overlaps and Conflicts of Jurisdiction Between the WTO and Regional Trade Agreements,” in Bartels, Lorand and Ortino, Frederico (eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 465–524.Google Scholar
Lee, Edward. 2011. “Measuring TRIPS Compliance and Defiance: The WTO Compliance Scorecard,” Journal of Intellectual Property Law 18(2): 401–445.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mereidth Kolsky and Van den Bossche, Peter. 2013. “What to Do When Disagreement Strikes? The Complexity of Dispute Settlement Under Trade Agreements,” in Frankel, Susy and Kolsky Lewis, Meredith (eds.), Trade Agreements at the Crossroads. London: Routledge, pp. 9–25.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2002. “Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements,” International Organization 56(3): 477–513.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle and Wyatt, Julian. 2010. “Dispute Settlement Regimes Intermingled: Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1(1): 67–95.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. 2015. “Dispute Settlement in the WTO (Mind over Matter),” EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/34.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. and Sapir, André. 2015. “Dial PTAs for Peace: The Influence of Preferential Trade Agreements on Litigation Between Trading Partners,” Journal of World Trade 49(3): 351–372.Google Scholar
McRae, Donald. 2008. “Measuring the Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement System,” Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy 3(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2003. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2016. “Minority Rules: Precedent and Participation Before the WTO Appellate Body,” in Jemielniak, Joanna, Nielsen, Laura, and Olsen, Henrik Palmer (eds.), Establishing Judicial Authority in International Economic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 141–172.Google Scholar
Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2014. “The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application,” American Political Science Review 108(3): 547–564.Google Scholar
Phelan, William. 2015. “Enforcement and Escape in the Andean Community: Why the Andean Community of Nations Is Not a Replica of the European Union,” Journal of Common Market Studies 53(4): 840–856.Google Scholar
Porges, Amelia. 2011. “Dispute Settlement,” in Chauffour, J. and Maur, J. (eds.), Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development: A Handbook. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, pp. 467–501.Google Scholar
Qian, M. A. 2012. “‘Reasonable Period of Time’ in the WTO Dispute Settlement System,” Journal of International Economic Law 15(1): 257–285.Google Scholar
Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2005. “Stability and Rigidity: Politics and Design of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Procedure,” American Political Science Review 99(3): 389–400.Google Scholar
Saldias, Osvaldo. 2014. The Judicial Politics of Economic Integration: The Andean Court as an Engine of Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sattler, Thomas, Spilker, Gabriele, and Bernauer, Thomas. 2014. “Does WTO Dispute Settlement Enforce or Inform?,” British Journal of Political Science 44(4): 877–902.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Warren F. and Sykes, Alan O. 2002. “The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization,” Journal of Legal Studies 31(S1): S179–S204.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2010. “Treaty Compliance and Violation,” Annual Review of Political Science 13(1): 273–296.Google Scholar
Smith, James McCall. 2000. “The Politics of Dispute Settlement Design: Explaining Legalism in Regional Trade Pacts,” International Organization 54(1): 137–180.Google Scholar
Spilker, Gabriele. 2012. “Compliance with WTO Dispute Rulings,” Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research Working Paper No. 2011/25: www.nccr-trade.org/fileadmin/user_upload/nccr-trade.ch/wp1/Compliance_Spilker_2012.pdf (accessed July 2017).Google Scholar
Squatrito, Theresa, Young, Oran R, Follesdal, Andreas, and Ulfstein, Geir. 2018. “A Framework for Evaluating the Performance of International Courts and Tribunals,” Chapter 1 in this volume.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas and McCall Smith, James. 2014. “Dispute Settlement in World Politics: States, Supranational Prosecutors, and Compliance,” European Journal of International Relations 20(1): 118–144.Google Scholar
Valles, Cherise M. and McGivern, Brendan P. 2000. “The Right to Retaliate Under the WTO Agreement: The ‘Sequencing Problem’,” Journal of World Trade 34(2): 63–84.Google Scholar
Vazquez, Carlos M. and Jackson, John H. 2002. “Some Reflections on Compliance with WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions,” Law and Policy in International Business 33(4): 555–567.Google Scholar
Webster, Timothy. 2014. “Paper Compliance: How China Implements WTO Decisions,” Michigan Journal of International Law 35(3): 525–578.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. 1991. “The Transformation of Europe,” Yale Law Journal 100(8): 2403–2483.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bruce. 2007. “Compliance by WTO Members with Adverse WTO Dispute Settlement Rulings: The Record to Date,” Journal of International Economic Law 10(2): 397–403.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Robert. 2015. “First Diagnose, Then Treat: What Ails the Doha Round?,” World Trade Review 14(1): 7–28.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2011. World Trade Report 2011. The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-Existence to Coherence. Geneva: WTO Publications.Google Scholar
Yang, Songling. 2012. “The Key Role of the WTO in Settling Its Jurisdictional Conflicts with RTAs,” Chinese Journal of International Law 11(2): 281–319.Google Scholar
Zdouc, Werner. 2005. “The Reasonable Period of Time for Compliance with the Rulings and Recommendations Adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body,” in Yerxa, Rufus and Wilson, Bruce (eds.), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: The First Ten Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88–97.Google Scholar
Zeng, Ka. 2013. “Legal Capacity and Developing Country Performance in the Panel Stage of the WTO Dispute Settlement System,” Journal of World Trade 47(1): 187–214.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Thomas A. 2006. Negotiating the Review of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding. London: Cameron May.Google Scholar

References

Abramovic, Victor. 2009. “From Massive Violations to Structural Patterns: New Approaches and Classic Tensions in the Inter-American Human Rights System,” Sur International Journal on Human Rights 6(11): 7–37.Google Scholar
AfCHPR. 2012. Report of the African Court on Human and People’s Rights, EX.CL/718(XX). Addis Ababa, African Union. Available at: http://en.african-court.org/index.php/publications/activity-reports (accessed June 15, 2017).Google Scholar
AfCHPR. 2013. “Interim Report of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights Notifying the Executive Council of Non-Compliance by a State, in Accordance with Article 31 of the Protocol.” Available at: http://en.african-court.org/index.php/publications/other-reports/85-interim-report-non-compliance-by-a-state-libya (accessed June 15, 2017).Google Scholar
AfCHPR. 2014. Activity Report of the African Court for the Year 2013, EX.CL/825(XXIV). Addis Ababa, African Union. Available at: www.iri.edu.ar/publicaciones_iri/anuario/cd_anuario_2014/Africa/22.pdf (accessed June 15, 2017).Google Scholar
Justice Akuffo, Sophia A. B. 2012. “Report of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Relevant Aspects regarding the Judiciary in the Protection of Human Rights in Africa, First Summit of Constitutional, Regional and Supreme Court Justices,” Mexico City, November 8–9, 2012.Google Scholar
Alvaro, Paul. 2012. “Sana Crítica: The System for Weighing Evidence Utilized by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights,” Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 18: 193–221.Google Scholar
Anagnostou, Dia and Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. 2014. “Domestic Implementation of Human Rights Judgments in Europe: Legal Infrastructure and Government Effectiveness Matter,” European Journal of International Law 25(1): 205–227.Google Scholar
Antkowiak, Thomas. 2008. “Remedial Approaches to Human Rights Violations: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Beyond,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 46(2): 351–419.Google Scholar
Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka. 2002. The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR. Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Bates, Edward. 2011. The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal. 1999. “Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31(4): 843–854.Google Scholar
Burstein, Mike. 2006. “The Will to Enforce: An Examination of the Political Constraints Upon a Regional Court of Human Rights,” Berkeley Journal of International Law 24(2): 423–443.Google Scholar
Çali, Başak. 2010. “The Logics of Supranational Human Rights Litigation, Official Acknowledgment, And Human Rights Reform: The Southeast Turkey Cases Before the European Court of Human Rights, 1996–2006,” Law & Social Inquiry 35(2): 311–337.Google Scholar
Cameron, Iain. 2013. “The Court and the Member States: Procedural Aspects,” in Follesdal, Andreas, Peters, Birgit, and Ulfstein, Geir (eds.) Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–61.Google Scholar
Cancado Trindade, Antonio. 2005. “International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium (II): General Course on Public International Law,” Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 317: 19–312.Google Scholar
Carter, William M. 2008. “Rethinking Subsidiarity in International Human Rights Adjudication,” Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 30(1): 319–334.Google Scholar
Cavallaro, James L. and Brewer, Stephanie. 2008. “Re-evaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-First Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court,” American Journal of International Law 102(4): 768–827.Google Scholar
Cavallaro, James L. and Schaffer, Emily J. 2004. “Less as More: Rethinking Supranational Litigation of Economic and Social Rights in the Americas,” Hastings Law Journal 56(2): 217–282.Google Scholar
Cavallaro, James L. and Schaffer, Emily J. 2006. “Rejoinder: Justice Before Justiciability: Inter-American Litigation and Social Change,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 39(2): 345–383.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram. 1976. “The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation,” Harvard Law Review 89(7): 1281–1316.Google Scholar
CoE. 1992. Reform of the Control System of the European Convention on Human Rights. Doc. No. H(92)14. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
CoE. 2006a. General Measures Adopted to Prevent New Violations of the European Convention on Human Rights: Stock-Taking of Measures Reported to the Committee of Ministers in Its Control of Execution of the Judgments and Decisions under the Convention, H/Exec (2006)1. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
CoE. 2006b. Individual Measures Adopted to Prevent New Violations of the European Convention on Human Rights: Stock-Taking of Measures Reported to the Committee of Ministers in Its Control of Execution of the Judgments and Decisions under the Convention, H/Exec (2006)2. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
CoE. 2015. Brussels Declaration. High Level Conference on the “Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights Our Shared Responsibility,” March 27, 2015. Available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Brussels_Declaration_ENG.pdf (accessed June 23, 2017).Google Scholar
CoM. 2013. Supervision of the Execution of Judgments and Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: 6th Annual Report of the CoM 2012. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/1680592ac8 (accessed June 15, 2017).Google Scholar
Drzemczewski, Andrew. 2015. “The Parliamentary Assembly’s Committee on the Election of Judges to the European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe,” Human Rights Law Journal 35(1): 269–273.Google Scholar
Dulitzky, Ariel L. 2015. “An Inter-American Constitutional Court? The Invention of the Conventionality Control by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights,” Texas International Law Journal 50(1): 45–93.Google Scholar
Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin and Coffey, Donald K. 2014. “Legitimacy and Independence of International Tribunals: An Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights,” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 37(2): 269–322.Google Scholar
Engel, N. P. 2012. “More Transparency and Governmental Loyalty for Maintaining Professional Quality in the Election of Judges to the European Court of Human Rights,” Human Rights Law Journal 32(7): 448–454.Google Scholar
ECtHR. 2009a. “Information Note on the Pilot-Judgment Procedure.” Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Pilot_judgment_procedure_ENG.pdf (accessed June 15, 2017).Google Scholar
ECtHR. 2009b. “The Court’s Priority Policy.” Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Priority_policy_ENG.pdf (accessed March 1, 2015).Google Scholar
ECtHR. 2011. “Violations by Article and by State 1959–2011.” Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Stats_violation_1959_2011_ENG.pdf (accessed June 14, 2017).Google Scholar
ECtHR. 2012. “Secondment to the Registry of National Lawyers: Information Note from the Registrar.” EF 08/10/2012 no. 3736699. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at: www.ucps.sk/subory/informat__vna_n__ta.pdf (accessed June 15, 2017).Google Scholar
ECtHR. 2015. “The ECHR in Facts and Figures 2014.” Available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Facts_Figures_2014_ENG.pdf (accessed June 14, 2017).Google Scholar
ECtHR. 2016. Rules of Court, adopted November 14, 2016. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Rules_Court_ENG.pdf (accessed June 15, 2017).Google Scholar
Forsythe, David. 1991. “Human Rights, the United States and the Organization of American States,” Human Rights Quarterly 13(1): 66–98.Google Scholar
Frowein, Jochen A. 2015. “The Transformation of Constitutional Law through the European Convention on Human Rights,” Human Rights Law Journal 35(1): 1–7.Google Scholar
Garcia-Sayan, Diego. 2012. “The Role of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Americas,” U.C. Davis Journal of International Law and Policy 19(1): 103–111.Google Scholar
Greer, Steven. 2006. The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darren and Jacoby, Wade. 2010. “Partial Compliance: A Comparison of the European and Inter-American Courts for Human Rights,” Journal of International Law and International Relations 6(1): 35–85.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 2008. “Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime,” European Journal of International Law 19(1): 125–159.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. and Slaughter, Ann-Marie. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication,” Yale Law Journal 107(2): 273–391.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1983. “Decreeing Organizational Change: Judicial Supervision of Public Institutions,” Duke Law Journal 32(6): 1265–1307.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2011. “Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights,” Cornell International Law Journal 44(3): 493–533.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2015. “Reforming the State from Afar: Structural Reform Litigation at the Human Rights Courts,” Yale Journal of International Law 40(1): 1–40.Google Scholar
International Commission of Jurists. 2015. The Arab Court of Human Rights: A Flawed Statute for an Ineffective Court (International Commission of Jurists, Geneva), available at: http://icj.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/MENA-Arab-Court-of-Human-Rights-Publications-Report-2015-ENG.pdf (accessed January 17, 2016).Google Scholar
Isanga, Joseph M. 2013. “The Constitutive Act of the African Union, African Courts and the Protection of Human Rights: New Dispensation?,” Santa Clara Journal of International Law 11(2): 267–302.Google Scholar
Kratochvil, Jan. 2011. “The Inflation of the Margin of Appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights,” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 29(3): 324–357.Google Scholar
Letsas, George. 2006. “Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26(4): 705–732.Google Scholar
Limbach, Jutta, Villalón, Pedro Cruz, Errera, Roger, Lester, Anthony P. et al. 2003. Judicial Independence: Law and Practice of Appointments to the European Court of Human Rights. London: Interights.Google Scholar
Lixinski, Lucas 2010. “Treaty Interpretation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights Expansion at the Service of Unity of International Law,” European Journal of International Law 21(3): 585–604.Google Scholar
Loucaides, Loukis G. 2010. “Reflections of a Former European Court of Human Rights Judge on His Experiences as a Judge,” Roma Rights 1. Available at: www.errc.org/roma-rights-journal/roma-rights-1-2010-implementation-of-judgments/3613/8 (accessed June 2017).Google Scholar
Martinez, Jenny S. 2003. “Towards an International Judicial System,” Stanford Law Review 56(2): 429–529.Google Scholar
Matua, Makau 1999. “The African Human Rights Court: A Two-Legged Stool?,” Human Rights Quarterly 21(2): 342–363.Google Scholar
Melish, Tara J. 2007. “Rethinking the ‘Less as More’ Thesis: Supranational Litigation of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in the Americas,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 39(2): 171–343.Google Scholar
Mendez, Juan and Cone, Catherine. 2013. “Does Human Rights Law Make a Difference: Lessons from Latin America,” in Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 956–979.Google Scholar
Merrills, John G. 1997. “The Council of Europe (I): The European Convention on Human Rights,” in Hanski, Raija and Suksi, Markku (eds.), An Introduction to the International Protection of Human Rights. Turku: Institute for Human Rights, pp. 287–306.Google Scholar
Muylle, Koen. 2013. “Prisoners’ Right to Vote: The Hirst Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights and its Application by the Belgian Constitutional Court,” in Alen, André, Joosten, Veronique, Leysen, Riet, and Verrijdt, Willem (eds.), Liberae Cogitationes: Liber Amicorum Marc Bossuyt. Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 403–418.Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L. 2008. “Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights,” European Journal of International Law 19(1): 101–23.Google Scholar
Oellers-Frahm, Karin. 2011. “Lawmaking through Advisory Opinions?,” German Law Journal 12(5): 1033–1056.Google Scholar
Palchetti, Paolo. 2013. “Interpreting ‘Generic Terms’: Between Respect for the Parties’ Original Intention and the Identification of the Ordinary Meaning,” in Boschiero, Nerina, Scovazzi, Tullio, Pitea, Cesare, and Ragni, Chiara (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law: Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves. The Hague: Asser Press, pp. 91–105.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Assembly. 2010. Report on the Implementation of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, Doc 12455, December 20, 2010. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at: www.coe.int/t/dgi/brighton-conference/documents/pace_documents/AP_DOC_12455_EN.pdf (accessed June 15, 2017).Google Scholar
Parliamentary Assembly. 2011. “Ad Hoc Judges at the European Court of Human Rights: An Overview,” Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at: www.assembly.coe.int/CommitteeDocs/2011/ajdoc36_2011.pdf (accessed June 15, 2017).Google Scholar
Parliamentary Assembly. 2016. Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights in States Parties: Selected Examples, AS/Jur/Inf (2016)04. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at: http://website-pace.net/documents/19838/419003/AS-JUR-INF-2016-04-EN.pdf/12d802b0-5f09-463f-8145-b084a095e895 (accessed June 15, 2017).Google Scholar
Pasqualucci, Jo M. 2003. The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, Arthur H. and Merrills, John G. 1994. Human Rights in Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Schermers, Henry G. 1999. “Acceptance of International Supervision of Human Rights,” Leiden Journal of International Law 12(4): 821–831.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah. 2013, “Jura Novit Curia in International Human Rights Tribunals,” in Boschiero, Nerina, Scovazzi, Tullio, Pitea, Cesare, and Ragni, Chiara (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law: Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves. The Hague: Asser Press, pp. 187–209.Google Scholar
Sicilianos, Linos-Alexander. 2012. “The Human Face of International Law – Interactions between General International Law and Human rights: An Overview,” Human Rights Law Journal 32: 1–11.Google Scholar
Tan, Morse H. 2008. “Upholding Human Rights in the Hemisphere: Casting Down Impunity Through the Inter-American Court of Human Rights,” Texas International Law Journal 43(2): 243–286.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2007. “The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights,” International Organization 61(4): 669–701.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2008. “The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights,” American Political Science Review 102(4): 417–433.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2010. “Borrowing and Nonborrowing among International Courts,” Journal of Legal Studies 39(2): 547–576.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2013. “Public Opinion and the Legitimacy of International Courts,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 14(2): 411–436.Google Scholar

References

Akande, Dapo. 2004. “International Law Immunities and the International Criminal Court,” American Journal of International Law 98(3): 407–433.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo. 2009a. “Sources of International Criminal Law,” in Cassese, Antonio, Acquaviva, Guido, and Akande, Dapo et al. (eds.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 41–53.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo. 2009b. “The Legal Nature of Security Council Referrals to the ICC and Its Impact on Al Bashir’s Immunities,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 7(2): 333–352.Google Scholar
Aksenova, Marina. 2015. “The Specific Direction Requirement for Aiding and Abetting: A Call for Revisiting Comparative Criminal Law,” Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 4(1): 88–107.Google Scholar
Alamuddin, Amal and Webb, Philippa. 2010. “Expanding Jurisdiction over War Crimes under Article 8 of the ICC Statute,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 8(5): 1219–1243.Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai. 2014. Treatise on International Criminal Law. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Appel, Benjamin J. 2016. “In the Shadow of the International Criminal Court: Does the ICC Deter Human Rights Violations?,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 60: 1–26.Google Scholar
Arajärvi, Noora. 2014. The Changing Nature of Customary International Law: Methods of Interpreting the Concept of Custom in International Criminal Tribunals. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bachmann, Klaus and Fatić, Aleksandar. 2015. The UN International Criminal Tribunals: Transition without Justice? Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bartels, Rogier. 2017. “Legitimacy and ICC Jurisdiction Following Security Council Referrals: Conduct on the Territory of Non-Party States and the Legality Principle,” in Hayashi, Nobuo, Bailliet, Cecilia. M., and Nicholson, Joanna (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Criminal Tribunals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennouna, Mohamed. 2002. “The Statute’s Rules on Crimes and Existing or Developing International Law,” in Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola, and Jones, John R. W. D. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1101–1107.Google Scholar
Blank, Laurie R. 2012. “Operational Law Experts Roundtable on the Gotovina Judgment: Military Operations, Battlefield Reality and the Judgment’s Impact on Effective Implementation and Enforcement of International Humanitarian Law,” Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series Research Paper No. 12–186. Atlanta: Emory University School of Law.Google Scholar
Boelaert-Suominen, Sonja. 2000. “Commentary: The Yugoslavia Tribunal and the Common Core of Humanitarian Law Applicable to All Armed Conflicts,” Leiden Journal of International Law 13(3): 619–653.Google Scholar
Bogoeva, Julija. 2016. “International Judges and Government Interests: The Case of President Meron,” FICHL Policy Brief Series No. 48 (2016).Google Scholar
Bohlander, Michael (ed.), 2007. International Criminal Justice: A Critical Analysis of Institutions and Procedures. London: Cameron May.Google Scholar
Boyle, Alan and Chinkin, Christine. 2006. The Making of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A. 2016. “Customary International Law Adjudication as Common Law Adjudication,” in Bradley, Curtis A. (ed.), Custom’s Future International Law in a Changing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–61.Google Scholar
Bufalini, Alessandro. 2015. “The Principle of Legality and the Role of Customary International Law in the Interpretation of the ICC Statute,” Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 14(2): 233–254.Google Scholar
Cançado, Trindade, Augusto, Antônio. 2010. International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio 1999. “The Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some Preliminary Reflections,” European Journal of International Law 10(1): 144–171.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio and Gaeta, P. 2013. Cassese’s International Criminal Law. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Jonathan H. 2014. “Early Release in International Criminal Law,” Yale Law Journal 123(6): 1784–1828.Google Scholar
Clark, Janine Natalya. 2013. “Courting Controversy: The ICTY’s Acquittal of Croatian Generals Gotovina and Markač,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 11(2): 399–423.Google Scholar
Clark, Janine Natalya. 2014. International Trials and Reconciliation: Assessing the Impact of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clark, Janine Natalya. 2015. “‘Specific Direction’ and the Fragmentation of International Jurisprudence on Aiding and Abetting: Perišić and Beyond,” International Criminal Law Review 15(3): 411–451.Google Scholar
Corn, Geoffrey S. and Corn, Gary P. 2012. “The Law of Operational Targeting: Viewing the LOAC Through an Operational Lens,” Texas International Law Journal 47(2): 337–380.Google Scholar
Cryer, Robert. 2005–2006. “Prosecutor v. Galić and the War Crime of Terror Bombing,” Israel Defense Forces Law Review 2: 75–101.Google Scholar
Cryer, Robert. 2009. “Royalism and the King: Article 21 of the Rome Statute and the Politics of Sources,” New Criminal Law Review 12(3): 390–405.Google Scholar
Cryer, Robert. 2010. “The Ad Hoc Tribunals and the Law of Command Responsibility: A Quiet Earthquake,” in Darcy, Shane and Powderly, Joseph (eds.), Judicial Creativity at the International Criminal Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 159–183.Google Scholar
Cryer, Robert. 2012. “International Criminal Justice in Historical Context: The Post-Second World War Trials and Modern International Criminal Justice,” in Boas, Gideon, Schabas, William A., and Scharf, Michael P. (eds.), International Criminal Justice: Legitimacy and Coherence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 145–189.Google Scholar
Cryer, Robert. 2015. “The ICC and Its Relationship to Non-States Parties,” in Stahn, Carsten (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 260–280.Google Scholar
Cryer, Robert, Friman, Hakan, Robinson, Darryl, and Wilmshurst, Elizabeth (eds.). 2010. An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Damaska, Mirjan R. 2008. “What Is the Point of International Criminal Justice?,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 83(1): 329–365.Google Scholar
Danner, Allison Marston. 2006. “When Courts Make Law: How the International Criminal Tribunals Recast the Laws of War,” Vanderbilt Law Review 59(1): 1–65.Google Scholar
Darcy, Shane. 2003. “The Evolution of the Law of Belligerent Reprisals,” Military Law Review 175: 184–251.Google Scholar
Darcy, Shane. 2010. “Bridging the Gaps in the Law of Armed Conflict? International Criminal Tribunals and the Development of Humanitarian Law,” in Quénivet, Noëlle and Shah-Davis, Shilan (eds.), International Law and Armed Conflict: Challenges in the 21st Century. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, pp. 319–337.Google Scholar
Darcy, Shane. 2014. “Assistance, Direction and Control: Untangling International Judicial Opinion on Individual and State Responsibility for War Crimes by Non-State Actors,” International Review of the Red Cross 96(893): 243–273.Google Scholar
DeGuzman, Margaret McAuliffe. 2008. “Applicable Law: Article 21,” in Triffterer, Otto (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article. 2nd edn. Baden-Baden: C. H. Beck Hart Nomos, pp. 435–446.Google Scholar
Dietrich, John. 2014. “The Limited Prospects of Deterrence by the International Criminal Court: Lessons from Domestic Experience,” International Social Science Review 88(3): 1–26.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut. 2003. “War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, with a Special Focus on the Negotiations on the Elements of Crimes,” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 7: 341–407.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark A. 2007. Atrocity, Punishment and International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duffy, Helen. 2015. The “War on Terror” and the Framework of International Law. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fichtelverg, Aaron. 2008. “Liberal Values in International Criminal Law: A Critique of Erdemovic,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 6(1): 3–19.Google Scholar
Fischer, Martina and Simić, Olivera (eds.), 2016. Transitional Justice and Reconciliation: Lessons from the Balkans. Abington: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P. and Ohlin, Jens David. 2005. “Reclaiming Fundamental Principles of Criminal Law in the Darfur Case,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 3(3): 539–561.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Paola. 1999. “The Defence of Superior Orders: The Statute of the International Criminal Court versus Customary International Law,” European Journal of International Law 10(1): 172–191.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Paola. 2009. “Does President Al Bashir Enjoy Immunity from Arrest?,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 7(2): 315–332.Google Scholar
Gillett, Matthew and Schuster, Matthias. 2011. “Fast-Track Justice: The Special Tribunal for Lebanon Defines Terrorism,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 9(5): 989–1020.Google Scholar
Graf, Roman. 2012. “The International Criminal Court and Child Soldiers: An Appraisal of the Lubanga Judgment,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 10(4): 945–969.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Alexander K. A. 2014. “International Criminal Law for Retributivists,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 35(4): 969–1044.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher. 1989. “The Twilight of the Law of Belligerent Reprisals,” Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 20: 35–69.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher. 2006. “Belligerent Reprisals in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia,” in Greenwood, Christopher (ed.), Essays on War in International Law. London: Cameron May, pp. 331–351.Google Scholar
Grover, Leena. 2010. “A Call to Arms: Fundamental Dilemmas Confronting the Interpretation of Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,” European Journal of International Law 21(3): 543–583.Google Scholar
Guibert, Nulwenn and Blumenstock, Tilman. 2007. “The First Judgment of the Special Court for Sierra Leone: A Missed Opportunity?,” The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 6(3): 367–391.Google Scholar
Günther, Klaus. 2011. “Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers: Judicial Lawmaking, Discourse Theory, and the ICTY on Belligerent Reprisals,” German Law Journal 12(5): 1261–1278.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. and Hsiang, Jerome. 2016. “Reinvigorating Customary International Law,” in Bradley, Curtis A. (ed.), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 275–304.Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica. 2016. “Custom’s Method and Process: Lessons from Humanitarian Law,” in Bradley, Curtis A. (ed.), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 148–171.Google Scholar
Haque, Adil Ahmad. 2005. “Group Violence and Group Vengeance: Toward a Retributivist Theory of International Criminal Law,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 9(1): 272–328.Google Scholar
Harhoff, Frederik. 2016. “Mystery Lane: A Note on Independence and Impartiality in International Criminal Trials,” FICHL Policy Brief Series No. 47 (2016).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Nobuo. 2009. “Critical Essays: Eve La Haye on War Crimes in Internal Armed Conflicts,” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 27(3): 357–365.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Nobuo. 2017a. “Is the Yugoslav Tribunal Guilty of Hyper-Humanising International Humanitarian Law?,” in Hayashi, Nobuo, Bailliet, Cecilia M., and Nicholson, Joanna (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Criminal Tribunals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Nobuo. 2017b. Military Necessity. Leiden: Leiden University Repository.Google Scholar
Heinsch, Robert. 2010. “The Crime of Aggression After Kampala: Success or Burden for the Future?,” Goettingen Journal of International Law 2(2): 713–743.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise. 2005. Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume I: Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn. 1998. “The International Court of Justice and Human Rights,” in Wellens, Karel (ed.), International Law: Theory and Practice: Essays in Honour of Eric Suy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 691–706.Google Scholar
Huffman, Walter B. 2012. “Margin of Error: Potential Pitfalls of the Rulings in The Prosecutor v. Ante Gotovina,” Military Law Review 211: 1–56.Google Scholar
Hunt, David. 2004. “The International Criminal Court: High Hopes, ‘Creative Ambiguity’ and an Unfortunate Mistrust in International Judges,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 2(1): 56–70.Google Scholar
International Law Commission. 2002. Rapport final sur la succession en matière de traités.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, Radtke, Mitchell, and Simmons, Beth A. 2018. “Assessing the International Criminal Court,” Chapter 6 in this volume.Google Scholar
Jurdi, Nidal Nabil. 2014. “The Crime of Terrorism in Lebanese and International Law,” in Alamuddin, Amal, Jurdi, Nidal Nabil, and Tolbert, David (eds.), The Special Tribunal for Lebanon: Law and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 73–87.Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits. 1990. “Belligerent Reprisals Revisited,” Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 21: 43–80.Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits. 2003. “Reprisals and the Protection of Civilians: Two Recent Decision of the Yugoslav Tribunal,” in Vohrah, Lal Chand, Pocar, Fausto, Featherstone, Yvonne, Fourmy, Olivier, Graham, Christine, and Hocking, John et al. (eds.), Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 481–510.Google Scholar
Kamminga, Menno T. 1996. “State Succession in Respect of Human Rights Treaties,” European Journal of International Law 7(4): 469–484.Google Scholar
Kamminga, Menno T. 2005. Preliminary Report “Human Rights Treaties and State Succession”. Strasbourg: European Commission for Democracy Through Law.Google Scholar
Kelder, Jessica M., Holá, Barbora, and van Wijk, Joris. 2014. “Rehabilitation and Early Release of Perpetrators of International Crimes: A Case Study of the ICTY and ICTR,” International Criminal Law Review 14(6): 1177–1203.Google Scholar
Kirakosyan, Yeghishe. 2012. “Finding Custom: The ICJ and the International Criminal Courts and Tribunals Compared,” in Van den Herik, Larissa and Stahn, Carsten (eds.), The Diversification and Fragmentation of International Criminal Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 149–162.Google Scholar
Kirgis, Frederic L. 1987. “Custom on a Sliding Scale,” American Journal of International Law 81(1): 146–151.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Philippe. 2006. “Customary International Humanitarian Law, Its Enforcement, and the Role of the International Criminal Court,” in Maybee, Larry and Chakka, Benarji (eds.), Custom as a Source of International Humanitarian Law: Proceedings of the Conference to Mark the Publication of the ICRC Study “Customary International Humanitarian Law.” New Delhi: International Committee of the Red Cross, pp. 79–85.Google Scholar
Kiyani, Asad G. 2013. “Al-Bashir & the ICC: The Problem of Head of State Immunity,” Chinese Yearbook of International Law 12(3): 467–508.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert. 2013. “The Main Epochs of Modern International Humanitarian Law Since 1864 and Their Related Dominant Legal Constructions,” in Larsen, Kjetil Mujezinovic, Cooper, Camilla Guldahl, and Nystuen, Gro (eds.), Searching for a “Principle of Humanity” in International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–71.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert. 2014. “The Jurisprudence of the Yugoslav and Rwandan Criminal Tribunals on Their Jurisdiction and on International Crimes (2004–2014),” British Yearbook of International Law 84(1): 131–186.Google Scholar
Krieger, Heike. 2012. “Cases of State Succession, State Responsibility and Outbreak of Hostilities,” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary. Berlin: Springer, pp. 1239–1266.Google Scholar
Kreß, Claus. 2009. “The Crime of Genocide and Contextual Elements: A Comment on the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber’s Decision in the Al-Bashir Case,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 7(2): 297–306.Google Scholar
Ku, Julian and Nzelibe, Jide. 2006. “Do International Criminal Tribunals Deter or Exacerbate Humanitarian Atrocities?,” Washington University Law Review 84(4): 777–833.Google Scholar
La Haye, Eve. 2008. War Crimes in Internal Armed Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lepard, Brian D. 2016. “Customary International Law as a Dynamic Process,” in Bradley, Curtis A. (ed.), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 62–94.Google Scholar
Matheson, Michael J. 1987. “Session One: The United States Position on the Relation of Customary International Law to the 1977 Protocols Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions: Remarks of Michael J. Matheson,” American University Journal of International Law and Policy 2(2): 419–431.Google Scholar
McCormack, Tim L. H. and Robertson, Susan. 1999. “Jurisdictional Aspects of the Rome Statute for the New International Criminal Court,” Melbourne University Law Review 23(3): 635–667.Google Scholar
McDermott, Yvonne. 2016. Fairness in International Criminal Trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Gabrielle Kirk. 1998. “The Eleventh Annual Waldemar A. Solf Lecture: The Changing Nature of the Laws of War,” Military Law Review 156: 30–51.Google Scholar
McBride, Julie. 2014. The War Crime of Child Soldiers Recruitment. The Hague: Asser Press.Google Scholar
Melzer, Nils. 2009. Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. 1991. Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. 1995. “International Criminalization of Internal Atrocities,” American Journal of International Law 89(3): 554–577.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. 1998a. “The Hague Tribunal: Working to Clarify International Humanitarian Law,” American University International Law Review 13(6): 1511–1518.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. 1998b. “War Crimes Law Comes of Age,” American Journal of International Law 92(3): 462–468.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. 2014. “Customary Humanitarian Law Today: From the Academy to the Courtroom,” in Clapham, Andrew and Gaeta, Paola (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
Mettraux, Gunénaël. 2005. International Crimes and the Ad Hoc Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko. 2011. “Is the Rome Statute Binding on Individuals? (And Why We Should Care),” Journal of International Criminal Justice 9(1): 25–52.Google Scholar
Ministère de la défense de la République français. 2012. Manuel de droit des conflits armés. Paris: Ministère de la defense.Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay. 2005. “Towards the Unification of International Humanitarian Law?,” in Burchill, Richard, White, Nigel D., and Morris, Justin (eds.), International Conflict and Security Law: Essays in Memory of Hilaire McCoubrey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 108–128.Google Scholar
Murphy, Peter W. 2000. “Judging War Criminals (book review),” Texas International Law Journal 35(2): 325–333.Google Scholar
Neuner, Matthias. 2002. “The Power of International Criminal Tribunals to Produce Evidence,” in Roggemann, Herwig and Šarčević, Petar (eds.), National Security and International Criminal Justice. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 163–191.Google Scholar
Newman, Stephen C. 2000. “Duress as a Defense to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity – Prosecutor v. Drazen Erdemovic,” Military Law Review 166: 158–171.Google Scholar
Newton, Michael A. 2010. “Reconsidering Reprisals,” Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 20(3): 361–388.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Joanna. 2017. Fighting and Victimhood in International Criminal Law. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Office of General Counsel. 2015. Department of Defense Law of War Manual. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense.Google Scholar
Ochoa, Christiana. 2007. “The Individual and Customary International Law Formation,” Virginia Journal of International Law 48(1): 119–186.Google Scholar
O’Donohue, Jonathan. 2015. “The ICC and the ASP,” in Stahn, Carsten (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–138.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander. 2008. “Review of Books: Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law and The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law,” British Yearbook of International law 79(1): 371–378.Google Scholar
Orentlicher, Diane F. 2008. Shrinking the Space for Denial: The Impact of the ICTY in Serbia. New York: Open Society institute.Google Scholar
Orie, Alphons M. M. 2012. “Stare Decisis in the ICTY Appeal System? Successor Responsibility in the Hadžihasanović Case,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 10(3): 635–644.Google Scholar
Quéquiner, Jean-François. 2008. “The Principle of Distinction: Beyond an Obligation of Customary International Humanitarian Law,” in Hensel, Howard M. (ed.), The Legitimate Use of Military Force: The Just War Tradition and the Customary Law of Armed Conflict. Hampshire, Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 161–187.Google Scholar
Rasulov, Akbar. 2003. “Revisiting State Succession to Humanitarian Treaties: Is There a Case for Automaticity?,” European Journal of International Law 14(1): 141–170.Google Scholar
Reeves, Shane R. and Thurnher, Jeffrey S. 2013. “Are We Reaching a Tipping Point? How Contemporary Challenges Are Affecting the Military Necessity-Humanity Balance,” Harvard National Security Journal Features: 1–12.Google Scholar
Robinson, Darryl. 2001. “The Elements for Crimes Against Humanity: Introduction,” in Lee, Roy S. and Friman, Hakan (eds.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, pp. 57–61.Google Scholar
Ryngaert, Cedric. 2015. Jurisdiction in International Law. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila. 2000. “Custom, Codification and Some Thoughts about the Relationship between the Two: Article 10 of the ICC Statute,” De Paul Law Review 49(4): 909–923.Google Scholar
Saul, Ben. 2012. “Civilizing the Exception: Universally Defining Terrorism,” in Masferrer, Aniceto (ed.), Post 9/11 and the State of Permanent Emergency: Security and Human Rights in Countering Terrorism. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 79–100.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. 2007. The UN International Criminal Tribunals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. 2008. “State Policy as an Element of International Crimes,” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 98(3): 953–982.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. 2009. “Customary Law or ‘Judge-Made’ Law: Judicial Creativity at the UN Criminal Tribunals,” in Doria, José, Gasser, Hans-Peter, and Bassiouni, M. Cherif (eds.), The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 77–101.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. 2011. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. 4th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael P. 2011. “Special Tribunal for Lebanon Issues Landmark Ruling on Definition of Terrorism and Modes of Participation,” ASIL Insights 15(6).Google Scholar
Schlütter, Birgit. 2010. Developments in Customary International Law: Theory and the Practice of the International Court of Justice and the International ad hoc Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N. 2010. “Military Necessity and Humanity in International Humanitarian Law: Preserving the Delicate Balance,” Virginia Journal of International Law 50(4): 795–839.Google Scholar
Schomburg, Wolfgang. 2009. “The Role of International Criminal Tribunals in Promoting Respect for Fair Trial Rights,” Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 8(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Secretary-General of the United Nations. 1993. Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to paragraph 2 of Security Council Resolution 808 (1993). S/25704, May 3, 1993.Google Scholar
Shahabuddeen, Mohamed. 1996. Precedent in the World Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shahabuddeen, Mohamed. 2004. “Does the Principle of Legality Stand in the Way of Progressive Development of Law?,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 2(4): 1007–1017.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Skordas, Achilles. 2003. “Hegemonic Custom?,” in Byers, Michael and Nolte, Georg (eds.). United States Hegemony and the Foundation of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 317–347.Google Scholar
Sluiter, Göran. 2004. “Judicial Assistance,” in Klip, André and Sluiter, Göran (eds.), Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 2001, Vol. 7. Antwerp: Intersentia, pp. 243–247.Google Scholar
Sluiter, Göran. 2010. “Procedural Lawmaking at the International Criminal Tribunals,” in Darcy, Shane and Powderly, Joseph (eds.), Judicial Creativity at the International Criminal Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 315–331.Google Scholar
Smith, Alison. 2004. “Child Recruitment and the Special Court for Sierra Leone,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 2(4): 1141–1153.Google Scholar
Sofaer, Abraham D. 1987. “The Position of the United States on Current Law of War Agreements: Remarks of Judge Abraham D. Sofaer, Legal Adviser, United States Department of State, January 22, 1987,” American University Journal of International Law and Policy 2(2): 460–471.Google Scholar
Solis, Gary D. 2013. “The Gotovina Acquittal: A Sound Appellate Course Correction,” Military Law Review 215: 78–107.Google Scholar
Stato Maggiore della Difesa. 1991. Manuale di diritto umanitario. SMD-G-014. Rome: Stato Maggiore della Difesa.Google Scholar
Stewart, James. 2003. “Towards a Single Definition of Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law: A Critique of International Armed Conflict,” International Review of the Red Cross 850: 313–350.Google Scholar
Swart, Mia. 2002. “Ad Hoc Rules for Ad Hoc Tribunals? The Rule-Making Power of the Judges of the ICTY and ICTR,” South African Journal on Human Rights 18(4): 570–589.Google Scholar
Swart, Mia. 2010. “Judicial Lawmaking at the ad hoc Tribunals: The Creative Use of the Sources of International Law and ‘Adventurous Interpretation’,” Heidelberg Journal of International Law 70: 459–486.Google Scholar
Turns, David. 1998. “The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: The Erdemovic Case,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 47(2): 461–474.Google Scholar
UK Ministry of Defence. 2004. The Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vallentgoed, Darren. 2013. “The Last Round? A Post-Gotovina Reassessment of the Legality of Using Artillery Against Built-Up Areas,” Journal of Conflict & Security Law 18(1): 25–57.Google Scholar
Van den Herik, Larissa. 2010. “Using Custom to Reconceptualize Crimes Crimes Against Humanity,” in Darcy, Shane and Powderly, Joseph (eds.), Judicial Creativity at the International Criminal Tribunals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80–105.Google Scholar
Van den Herik, Larissa. 2016. “The Decline of Customary International Law as a Source of International Criminal Law,” in Bradley, Curtis A. (ed.), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 230–252.Google Scholar
Van Schaack, Beth. 2008. “Crimen Sene Lege: Judicial Lawmaking at the Intersection of Law and Morals,” The Georgetown Law Journal 97(1): 119–192.Google Scholar
Vasiliev, Sergey. 2016. “The Making of International Criminal Law,” in Brölmann, Catherine and Radi, Yannick (eds.), Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Lawmaking. Glos: Edward Elgar, pp. 354–394.Google Scholar
Ventura, Manuel J. 2011. “Terrorism According to the STL’s Interlocutory Decision on the Applicable Law: A Defining Moment or a Moment of Defining?,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 9(5): 1021–1042.Google Scholar
Ventura, Manuel J. 2014. “Farewell ‘Specific Direction’: Aiding and Abetting War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity in Perišić, Tayor, Šainović et al., and US Alien Tort Statute Jurisprudence,” in Casey-Maslen, Stuart (ed.), The War Report: Armed Conflict in 2013. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 511–553.Google Scholar
Villiger, Mark E. 1985. Customary International Law and Treaties: A Study of Their Interaction and Interrelations with Special Consideration of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Vité, Sylvain. 2012. “Between Consolidation and Innovation: The International Criminal Court’s Trial Chamber Judgment in the Lubanga Case,” Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 15: 61–85.Google Scholar
Von Hebel, Herman and Robinson, Darryl. 1999. “Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court,” in Lee, Roy S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations, Results. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 79–126.Google Scholar
Wagner, Natalie. 2013. “A Critical Assessment of Using Children to Participate Actively in Hostilities in Lubanga,” Criminal Law Forum 24(2): 145–203.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ruth. 1998. “Case Analysis: International Criminal Tribunals and State Sources of Proof: The Case of Tihomir Blaškić,” Leiden Journal of International Law 11(3): 635–654.Google Scholar
Werle, Gerhard and Jessberger, Florian. 2014. Principles of International Criminal Law. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wierda, Marieke and Triolo, Anthony. 2012. “Resources,” in Reydams, Luc, Wouters, Jan, and Ryngaert, Cedric (eds.), International Prosecutors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–170.Google Scholar
Wippman, David. 2006. “The Costs of International Justice,” American Journal of International Law 100(4): 861–881.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard Ashby. 2005. “Writing History: The Historical Record of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia,” Human Rights Quarterly 27(3): 908–942.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard Ashby. 2011. Writing History in International Criminal Tribunals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wouters, Jan and Hamid, Linda. 2016. “Custom and Informal International Lawmaking,” in Bradley, Curtis A. (ed.), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 332–359.Google Scholar
Zacklin, Ralph. 2004. “The Failings of Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunals,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 2(2): 541–545.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Andreas. 2006. “State Succession in Treaties,” Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×