Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:50:56.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Michelle V. Lee
Michelle V. Lee
Affiliation:
Biola University, California
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Paul, the Stoics, and the Body of Christ , pp. 201 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aelius Aristides: The Complete Works. Vol. II: Orations XVII–LIII. Edited by Behr, Charles A. P.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1981.Google Scholar
Ancient Epistolary Theorists. Edited by Malherbe, Abraham J.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Translated by Tredennick, Hughet al. 23 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926–91.Google Scholar
Athenaeus. Deipnosophists. Translated by Gulick, Charles Burton. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927–41.Google Scholar
The Authorised Daily Prayer Book. Translated by Singer, S.. New York: Bloch Publishing Co., 1962.Google Scholar
Cicero. Translated by Keyes, C. W.et al. 29 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913–99.Google Scholar
Demosthenes. Translated by Vince, J. H.et al. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926–49.Google Scholar
Dio Chrysostom. Translated by Crosby, H. Lamaret al. 5 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1932–51.Google Scholar
Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Translated by Hicks, R. H.. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1950–54.Google Scholar
Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Roman Antiquities. Translated by Cary, Ernest. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1943–56.Google Scholar
Epictetus. Translated by Oldfather, W. A.. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995–96.Google Scholar
The Hellenistic Philosophers. Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N.. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Isocrates. Translated by Norlin, George and Hook, Larue. 3 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954–56.Google Scholar
Josephus. Translated by Thackeray, H. St. J.et al. 10 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926–65.Google Scholar
Later Greek Religion. Edited by Bevan, Edwyn. London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd., 1926.Google Scholar
Livy. History of Rome. Translated by Foster, B. O.et al. 14 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1919–59.Google Scholar
Lucan, . The Civil War. Translated by J. D. Duff. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Lucian. Translated by Harmon, A. M. and MacLeod, M. D.. 8 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913–67.Google Scholar
4 Maccabees. In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. Translated by H. Anderson, edited by Charlesworth, James H.. Vol. II. New York: Doubleday, 1985: 531–64.Google Scholar
Manilius. Astronomica. Translated by Goold, G. P.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Marcus Aurelius. Translated by Haines, C. R.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Pausanius. Description of Greece. Translated by Jones, W. H. S. and Ormerod, H. A.. 5 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1918–35.Google Scholar
Philo. Translated by Colson, F. H. and Whitaker, G. H.. 12 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929–62.Google Scholar
Plato. Translated by Fowler, H. N.et al. 12 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914–39.Google Scholar
Plutarch. The Parallel Lives. Translated by Perrin, Bernadotte. 11 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914–26.Google Scholar
Plutarch.Moralia. Translated by Babbitt, Frank Coleet al. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927–69.Google Scholar
Physics of the Stoics. Edited and translated by Sambursky, S.. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Libanius. “Epistolary Styles.” In Ancient Epistolary Theorists, edited by Malherbe, Abraham J.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988: 66–81.Google Scholar
Quintilian. The Institutio Oratoria. Translated by Butler, H. E.. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Seneca. Translated by Gummere, Richard M.et al. 10 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1917–72.Google Scholar
Sextus Empiricus. Translated by Bury, R. G.. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933–49.Google Scholar
Ioannis Stobaei: Anthologium. Wachsmuth, Curtis and Hense, Otto. 5 vols. Berlin: Weidmann, 1894–1912.Google Scholar
Strabo. Geography. Translated by Jones, Horace Leonard. 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1917–32.Google Scholar
Thucydides. History of the Peloponnesian War. Translated by Smith, Charles Foster. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1919–23.Google Scholar
Xenophon. Translated by Brownson, Carleton L.et al. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914–23.Google Scholar
Aletti, J.-N. “La dispositio rhétorique dans les épitres pauliniennes. Proposition de méthode.” New Testament Studies 38 (1992): 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, Keimpe. “Stoic Theology.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 153–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson H. 4 Maccabees. In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, edited by Charlesworth, James H.. Vol. II. New York: Doubleday, 1985: 531–64.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. Dean Jr. Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Paul. Kampen: Kok Pharos Publishing House, 1996.Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. “‘Domina et Regina Virtutum’: Justice and Societas in De Officiis.” Phronesis 35 (1990): 258–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baasland, E. “Die περί -Formel und die Argumentation(ssituation) des Paulus.” Studia theologica 42 (1988): 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, David L. “The Interpretation of 1 Cor. 12–14.” Evangelical Quarterly 46 (1974): 224–34.Google Scholar
Baldry, H. C.The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Barbour, Robin S. “Wisdom and the Cross in 1 Corinthians 1 and 2.” In Theologia Crucis – Signum Crucis: Festschrift für Erich Dinkler, edited by Andresen, Carl and Klein, Günter. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1979: 57–71.Google Scholar
Barlow, Claude W.Epistolae Senecae ad Paulum et Pauli ad Senecam <quae vocantur>. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 10. Horn, Austria: Ferdinand Berger, 1938.Google Scholar
Barrett, C. K.The First Epistle to the Corinthians. London: Adam & Charles Black, 1968. (Repr., Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1996.)Google Scholar
Barton, S. C. “Paul's Sense of Place: An Anthropological Approach to Community Formation in Corinth.” New Testament Studies 32 (1986): 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassler, Jouette M. “1 Cor. 12:3 – Curse and Confession in Context.” Journal of Biblical Literature 101 (1982): 415–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Beasley G. R.Baptism in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar
Bertram, G. “νήπιος, νηπιάζω.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 IV: 912–23.
Best, Ernest. One Body in Christ. London: SPCK, 1955.Google Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter. Galatians. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979.Google Scholar
Bittlinger, A.Gifts and Graces: A Commentary on 1 Cor. 12–14. Translated by H. Klassen. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1968.Google Scholar
Blundell, Mary Whitlock. “Parental Nature and Stoic οἰκείωσις.” Ancient Philosophy 10 (1990): 221–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodson, Arthur. La morale sociale des derniers Stoîciens, Sénèque, Epictète et Marc Aurèle. Paris: Société d'Edition Les Belles Lettres, 1967.Google Scholar
Bonhöffer, Adolf. The Ethics of the Stoic Epictetus. Translated by William O. Stephens. New York: Peter Lang, 1996.Google Scholar
Bornkamm, Günther. Paul. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1971.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, George. “Eros in Government: Zeno and the Virtuous City.” Classical Quarterly 48 (1998): 168–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braaten, C. E.Eschatology and Ethics. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1974.Google Scholar
Bringmann, K.Untersuchungen zum späten Cicero. Hypomnemata 29. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Alexandra R.The Cross & Human Transformation. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995.Google Scholar
Bruce, F. F.1 and 2 Corinthians. London: Oliphants, 1971.Google Scholar
Bruce, F. F.1 & 2 Thessalonians. Word Biblical Commentary 45. Waco, TX: Word, 1982.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques. “The Stoic Theory of the Supreme Genus and Platonic Ontology.” In Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy, translated by Janet Lloyd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 92–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunt, P. A. “‘Amicitia’ in the Late Roman Republic.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 191 (1965): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunt, P. A.“Stoicism and the Principate.” Papers of the British School at Rome 43 (1975): 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament. 2 vols. Translated by Kendrick Grobel. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1954–55.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf.“The Problem of Ethics in Paul.” In Understanding Paul's Ethics, edited by Rosner, Brian S.; translated by Christoph W. Stenschke. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995: 195–216.Google Scholar
Bünker, M.Briefformular und rhetorische Disposition im 1 Korintherbrief.Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1984.Google Scholar
Burgess, Theodore. Epideictic Literature. Studies in Classical Philology 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1902.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. Y. “Κοινωνία and Its Cognates in the New Testament.” Journal of Biblical Literature 51 (1932): 352–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancik, Hildegaard. Untersuchungen zu Senecas Epistulae morales. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1967.Google Scholar
Carson, D. A.Showing the Spirit: A Theological Exposition of 1 Corinthians 12–14. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1987.Google Scholar
Cerfaux, L.The Church in the Theology of St. Paul. New York: Herder and Herder, 1959.Google Scholar
Chevallier, Max-Alain. Esprit de Dieu, parole d'hommes. Neuchatel: Delachaux & Niestlé, 1966.Google Scholar
Clements, Ronald. God and Temple. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1965.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L.The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. Vol. II: Stoicism in Christian Latin Thought through the Sixth Century. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1990.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L.“Stoicism and the New Testament: An Essay in Historiography.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York, 1992 26.1 (1992): 334–79.Google Scholar
Collins, John J. “Chiasmus, the ‘ABA’ Pattern and the Text of Paul.” In Studiorum Paulinorum Congressus Internationalis Catholicus 2 (1963): 575–83.Google Scholar
Collins, Raymond F.First Corinthians. Sacra Pagina 7. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Conger, George Perrigo. Theories of Macrocosms and Microcosms in the History of Philosophy. New York: Russell & Russell, 1967.Google Scholar
Conzelmann, Hans. 1 Corinthians. Translated by J. W. Leitch. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1975.Google Scholar
Cousar, Charles. “The Theological Task of 1 Corinthians: A Conversation with Gordon D. Fee and Victor Paul Furnish.” In Pauline Theology, edited by Bassler, Jouette M.. Vol. II. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993: 90–102.Google Scholar
Cranfield, C. E. B.A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. 2 vols. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1975.Google Scholar
Cuming, G. J. “ΕΠΟΤΙΣΘΗΜΕΝ (1 Corinthians 12,13).” New Testament Studies 27 (1981): 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Nils Alstrup. Studies in Paul. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1977.Google Scholar
Daines, Brian. “Paul's Use of the Analogy of the Body of Christ.” Evangelical Quarterly 50 (1978): 71–78.Google Scholar
Davies, W. D.Paul and Rabbinic Judaism. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980.Google Scholar
Broglie, G. “Le texte fondamentale de Saint Paul contre la foi naturelle.” Recherches de Science Religieuse 39 (1951): 253–66.Google Scholar
Deidun, T. J.New Covenant Morality. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Delling, G. “τέλειος.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 VII: 67–79.
Derrett, J. D. M. “Cursing Jesus (1 Cor. XII.3): The Jews as Religious ‘Persecutors.’ ” New Testament Studies 21 (1975): 544–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deSilva, David. “Paul and the Stoa: A Comparison.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 38 (1995): 549–64.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. The Middle Platonists. Ithaca: Cornell, 1977.Google Scholar
Dodd, C. H.Gospel and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Dodd, Brian. Paul's Paradigmatic “I”: Personal Example as Literary Strategy. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 177. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. Natural Symbols: Exploration in Cosmology. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982.Google Scholar
du Plessis, P. J.ΤΕΛΕΙΟΣ, The Idea of Perfection in the New Testament. Kampen: J. H. Kok, 1959.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G.Baptism in the Holy Spirit. London: SCM Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G.“‘The Body of Christ’ in Paul.” In Worship, Theology and Ministry in the Early Church, edited by Wilkins, Michael J. and Paige, Terence. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1992: 146–62.Google Scholar
Dyck, Andrew R.A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Ellingworth, Paul and Hatton, Howard. A Translator's Handbook on Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians. London: United Bible Societies, 1985.Google Scholar
Elliot, John. A Home for the Homeless. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1981.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. “Discovering the Good: oikeiōsis and kathēkonta in Stoic Ethics.” In The Norms of Nature, edited by Schofield, Malcolm and Striker, Gisela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 145–83.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels.“The Gospel and Social Practice According to 1 Corinthians.” New Testament Studies 33 (1987): 557–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels.The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis. Denmark: Aarhus University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels.Paul and the Stoics. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 2000.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Anders. Traditions as Rhetorical Proof. Coniectanea Biblica New Testament Series 27. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International, 1998.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D.The First Epistle to the Corinthians. New International Commentary on the New Testament Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D.Paul's Letter to the Philippians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar
Fiore, Benjamin SJ.The Function of Personal Example in the Socratic and Pastoral Epistles. Analecta biblica 105. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Fiore, Benjamin, SJ.“The Theory and Practice of Friendship in Cicero.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997: 59–76.Google Scholar
Fiske, Adele M. “Hieronymus Ciceronianus.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 96 (1965): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, John T. “Philippians in the Light of Some Ancient Discussions on Friendship.” In Friendship, Flattery and Frankness of Speech: Studies on Friendship in the New Testament World, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996: 141–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A., SJ. Romans. Anchor Bible 33. New York: Doubleday, 1993.Google Scholar
Fraisse, J. C.“Philia”: La notion d'amitié dans la philosophie antique. Essai sur un problème perdu et retrouvé. Paris: Librairie J. Vrin, 1974.Google Scholar
Furnish, Victor Paul. Theology and Ethics in Paul. Nashville: Abingdon, 1968.Google Scholar
Furnish, Victor Paul. II Corinthians. Anchor Bible 32A. New York: Doubleday, 1984.Google Scholar
Gale, Herbert W.The Use of Analogy in the Letters of Paul. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Garland, David E.1 Corinthians. Baker Exegetical Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2003.Google Scholar
Gärtner, B.The Temple and the Community Qumran and the New Testament. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgi, Dieter. Theocracy in Paul's Praxis and Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991.Google Scholar
Giblin, Charles Homer. In Hope of God's Glory: Pauline Theological Perspectives. New York: Herder and Herder, 1970.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher. “Personhood and Personality: The Four Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis I.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6 (1988): 169–99.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher.“The School in the Roman Imperial Period.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glad, Clarence. Paul and Philodemus: Adaptability in Epicurean and Early Christian Psychagogy. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goppelt, L.Theology of the New Testament. 2 vols. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981–82.Google Scholar
Grant, Robert M. “Hellenistic Elements in 1 Corinthians.” In Early Christian Origins, edited by Wikgren, Allen. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1961: 60–66.Google Scholar
Gressman, H. “Ν ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΙΩΝ.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 29 (1921): 224–30.Google Scholar
Grindheim, Sigurd: “Wisdom for the Perfect: Paul's Challenge to the Corinthian Church (1 Corinthians 2:6–16).” Journal of Biblical Literature (2002): 689–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundry, Robert H.SOMA in Biblical Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, George. The Structure of Hebrews: A Text-Linguistic Analysis. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadas, Moses, ed. and trans. The Third and Fourth Book of Maccabees. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1953.Google Scholar
Hadot, Ilsestraut. Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleitung. Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie 13. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahm, David E.The Origins of Stoic Cosmology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hainz, Josef. Ekklesia. Regensburg: Pustet, 1972.Google Scholar
Halliwell, Stephen. “Popular Morality, Philosophical Ethics, and the Rhetoric.” In Aristotle's Rhetoric, edited by Furley, David J. and Nehamas, Alexander. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994: 211–30.Google Scholar
Halliwell, Stephen.“The Challenge of Rhetoric to Political and Ethical Theory in Aristotle.” In Essays of Aristotle's Rhetoric, edited by Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996: 175–90.Google Scholar
Hauck, F. “κοινός, κτλ.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 III: 789–809.
Hawthorne, Gerald. Philippians. Word Biblical Commentary. Waco, TX: Word, 1983.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc'h, J.Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des parties politiques sous la République. Paris: Société d'Edition les Belles Lettres, 1963.Google Scholar
Hellerman, Joseph H.Reconstructing Honor in Roman Philippi: Carmen Christi as Cursus Pudorum. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hengel, Martin. Crucifixion. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977.Google Scholar
Hill, Andrew. “The Temple of Asclepius: An Alternative Source for Paul's Body Theology?” Journal of Biblical Literature 99 (1980): 437–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Forbes. “The Amorality of Aristotle's Rhetoric.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 22 (1981): 133–47.Google Scholar
Holladay, Carl R. “1 Corinthians 13: Paul as Apostolic Paradigm.” In Greeks, Romans, and Christians, edited by Balch, David L., Ferguson, Everett, Meeks, Wayne A.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990: 80–98.Google Scholar
Hoover, Roy W. “The Harpagmos Enigma: A Philological Solution.” Harvard Theological Review 64 (1971): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsley, Richard A. “1 Corinthians: A Case Study of Paul's Assembly as an Alternative Society.” In Paul and Empire: Religion and Power in Roman Imperial Society, edited by Horsley, Richard A.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 1997: 242–52.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard A.Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 2000.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard A.“Rhetoric and Empire – 1 Corinthians.” In Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation, edited by Horsley, Richard A.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 2000: 72–102.Google Scholar
Hurd, John C.The Origin of 1 Corinthians. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Hurtado, L. W. “Jesus as Lordly Example in Philippians 2:5–11.” In From Jesus to Paul, edited by Richardson, Peter and Hurd, John C.. Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1984: 113–26.Google Scholar
Iber, Gerhard. “Zum Verständnis von I Cor. 12:31.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 54 (1963): 43–52.Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad. “Comments on Professor Görgemanns' Paper: The Two Forms of Oikeiōsis in Arius and the Stoa.” In On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus, edited by Fortenbaugh, W. W.. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1983: 190–201.Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad. “Hierocles: Theory and Argument in the Second Century AD.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2 (1984): 151–83.Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad.“Seneca and Psychological Dualism.” In Passions & Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, edited by Brunschwig, Jacques and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993: 150–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Brad.“Rules and Reasoning in Stoic Ethics.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999: 95–127.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. “Stoic and Aristotelian Conceptions of Happiness.” In The Norms of Nature, edited by Schofield, Malcolm and Striker, Gisela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 205–44.Google Scholar
Jewett, Robert. Paul's Anthropological Terms: A Study of Their Use in Conflict Settings. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1971.Google Scholar
Johnston, G.The Doctrine of the Church in the New Testament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
Joly, Robert. Le vocabulaire chrétien de l'amour, est-il original?Brussels: Universitaires de Bruxelles, 1968.Google Scholar
Judge, E. A. “Paul as Radical Critic of Society.” Interchange 16 (1974): 191–203.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. Leib und Leib Christi. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1933.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. Perspectives in Paul. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1971.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. Essays on New Testament Themes. Translated by W. J. Montague. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A.The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A.Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A.New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, I. G. “Moral Actions and Rules in Stoic Ethics.” In The Stoics, edited by Rist, John M.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978: 247–58.Google Scholar
Kim, Seyoon. The Origin of Paul's Gospel. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1984.Google Scholar
Klauck, Hans-Josef. “Brotherly Love in Plutarch and in 4 Maccabees.” In Greeks, Romans, and Christians, edited by Balch, David L., Ferguson, Everett, and Meeks, Wayne A.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990: 144–56.Google Scholar
Knox, W. L. “Parallels to the N. T. Use of σω ̑μα.” Journal of Theological Studies 39 (1938): 243–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, W. L.Paul and the Church of the Gentiles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Konstan, David. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Werner. Christ, Lord, Son of God. Naperville: Alec R. Allenson, 1966.Google Scholar
Kümmel, W. G.Theology of the New Testament. London: SCM Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Lapidge, Michael. “Stoic Cosmology.” In The Stoics, edited by Rist, John M.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978: 161–85.Google Scholar
Lapidge, Michael. “Lucan's Imagery of Cosmic Dissolution.” Hermes 107 (1979): 344–70.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Andrew. Paradise Now and Not Yet. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litfin, Duane. St. Paul's Theology of Proclamation. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Long, A. A.. “The Stoic Concept of Evil.” Philosophical Quarterly 18 (1968): 329–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A.. Soul and Body in Stoicism. Berkeley: Center for Hermeneutical Studies, 1980.Google Scholar
Long, A. A.. “Soul and Body in Stoicism.” Phronesis 27 (1982): 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. “Stoic Eudaimonism.” In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, edited by Cleary, John J.. Vol. IV. Lanham: University Press of America, 1988: 77–101.Google Scholar
Longenecker, R. N.Paul: Apostle of Liberty. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1977.Google Scholar
Mack, B.Rhetoric and the NT. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J. “Antisthenes and Odysseus, and Paul at War.” Harvard Theological Review 76 (1983): 143–73.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J.“Exhortation in First Thessalonians.” Novum Testamentum 25 (1983): 238–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J.Paul and the Thessalonians. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1987.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J.Paul and the Popular Philosophers. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J.“Hellenistic Moralists and the New Testament.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York, 1992 26.1 (1992) 267–33.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. “Providence and the Destruction of the Universe in Early Stoic Thought.” In Studies in Hellenistic Religions, edited by Vermaseren, M. J.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1979: 129–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson, T. W. “A Parallel to a N.T. Use of σω ̑μα.” Journal of Theological Studies 37 (1936): 385.Google Scholar
Manson, T. W.On Jesus and Paul. London: SCM Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Marrou, H.A History of Education in Antiquity. Translated by George Lamb. New York: Sheed & Ward, 1956.Google Scholar
Marshall, Peter. Enmity in Corinth: Social Conventions in Paul's Relations with the Corinthians. Tübingen: Mohr, 1987.Google Scholar
Martin, Dale. “Tongues of Angels and Other Status Indicators.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 59 (1991): 547–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Dale.The Corinthian Body. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Martin, Ralph P.Carmen Christi. Philippians 2:5–11 in Recent Interpretation and in the Setting of Early Christian Worship. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Ralph P.The Spirit and the Congregation: Studies in 1 Corinthians 12–15. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1984.Google Scholar
Martin, Ralph P.2 Corinthians. Word Biblical Commentary 40. Waco, TX: Word, 1986.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A. “The Image of the Androgyne: Some Uses of a Symbol in Earliest Christianity.” History of Religions 13 (1974): 165–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A.The First Urban Christians. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A.“‘Since Then You Would Need to Go Out of the World’: Group Boundaries in Pauline Christianity.” In Critical History and Biblical Faith, edited by Ryan, Thomas J.. Villanova, PA: College Theology Society, 1985: 4–29.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A.The Moral World of the First Christians. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul W. “The Holy Spirit in the Pauline Letters.” Interpretation 33 (1979): 3–18.Google Scholar
Michel, O. “ναός.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 IV: 880–90.
Mitchell, Margaret M. “Concerning ΠΕPΙ ΔΕ in 1 Corinthians.” Novum Testamentum 31 (1989): 229–56.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M.Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 1991.Google Scholar
Mitsis, Philip. “Seneca on Reason, Rules, and Moral Development.” In Passions & Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, edited by Brunschwig, Jacques and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993: 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Leon M.1 Corinthians. Leicester: InterVarsity, 1985.Google Scholar
Motto, Anna Lydia. Seneca: Moral Epistles. Chico: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Moule, C. F. D. “Further Reflexions on Philippians 2:5–11.” In Apostolic History and the Gospel. Biblical and Historical Essays Presented to F. F. Bruce, edited by Gasque, W. W. and Martin, R. P.. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1970: 264–76.Google Scholar
Mullins, Terence Y. “Disclosure: A Literary Form in the New Testament.” Novum Testamentum 7 (1964): 44–50.Google Scholar
Mullins, Terence Y.. “Formulas in New Testament Epistles.” Journal of Biblical Literature 91 (1972): 380–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Johannes. Paul and the Salvation of Mankind. Atlanta: John Knox, 1959.Google Scholar
Murphy-O'Connor, Jerome. St. Paul's Corinth. Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1983.Google Scholar
Neufeld, Vernon. The Earliest Christian Confessions. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1963.Google Scholar
Neyrey, Jerome H.Paul, In Other Words: A Cultural Reading of His Letters. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 1990.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C.The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Obbink, Dirk. “The Stoic Sage in the Cosmic City.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999: 178–95.Google Scholar
Obbink, Dirk and Vander Waerdt, Paul A.. “Diogenes of Babylon: The Stoic Sage in the City of Fools.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 32 (1991): 355–96.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Peter T.Introductory Thanksgivings in the Letters of Paul. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Peter T.The Epistle to the Philippians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J.Orality and Literacy. London: Methuen, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Catherine. Eros Unveiled: Plato and the God of Love. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar
Panikulam, G.Koinonia in the New Testament, a Dynamic Expression of Christian Life. Analecta biblica. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Parsons, Michael. “Being Precedes Act: Indicative and Imperative in Paul's Writing.” In Understanding Paul's Ethics, edited by Rosner, Brian S.. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995: 217–47. (Reprinted from Evangelical Quarterly 60 [1988]: 99–127.)Google Scholar
Parunak, H. Van Dyke. “Transitional Techniques in the Bible.” Journal of Biblical Literature 102 (1983): 525–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Birger Albert. The Pneumatikos-Psychikos Terminology in 1 Corinthians. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 12. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Perdue, Leo. “Paraenesis and the Epistle of James.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 72 (1981): 241–56.Google Scholar
Perdue, Leo. “The Social Character of Paraenesis and Paraenetic Literature.” Semeia 59 (1990): 5–39.Google Scholar
Perelman, Ch. The Realm of Rhetoric. Translated by William Kluback. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Perelman, Ch. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.. The New Rhetoric. Translated by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Perriman, Andrew. “‘His Body, Which Is the Church …’ Coming to Terms with Metaphor.” Evangelical Quarterly 62 (1990): 123–42.Google Scholar
Pervo, Richard I. “With Lucian: Who Needs Friends? Friendship in the Toxaris.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Society of Biblical Literature Resources for Biblical Study 34. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997: 163–80.Google Scholar
Pogoloff, Stephen M.LOGOS AND SOPHIA: The Rhetorical Situation of 1 Corinthians. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, Max. Paulus und die Stoa (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1956).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “The Theoretical Justification for Application of Rhetorical Categories to Pauline Epistolary Literature.” In Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press, 1993: 100–22.Google Scholar
Rawlinson, A. E. J. “Corpus Christi.” In Mysterium Christi, edited by Bell, G. K. A. and Deissmann, Adolf. London: Longmans, 1930: 225–44.Google Scholar
Reed, Jeffrey T. “The Epistle.” In Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period: 330 B.C.–A.D. 400, edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: Brill, 1997: 171–93.Google Scholar
Renwick, David A.Paul, the Temple, and the Presence of God. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato's Timaeus. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rich, Audrey N. M. “The Platonic Ideas as the Thoughts of God.” Mnemosyne 7 (1954): 123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, J. M. “Categories and Their Uses.” In Problems in Stoicism, edited by Long, A. A.. London: Athlone Press, 1971: 38–57.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M.“Seneca and Stoic Orthodoxy.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York, 1992 36.3 (1989) 1993–2012.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M.“Plutarch's Amatorius: A Commentary on Plato's Theories of Love?” Classical Quarterly 51 (2001): 557–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. and Plummer, A.. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the First Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians. International Critical Commentary. T. & T. Clark: Edinburgh, 1994.Google Scholar
Robinson, John A. T.The Body. London: SCM Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. R. “ΕΠΟΤΙΣΘΗΜΕΝ Again.” New Testament Studies 29 (1983): 139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, G. M. “Seneca's Philosophical Influence.” In Seneca, edited by Costa, C. D. N.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974: 116–65.Google Scholar
Ruef, John. Paul's First Letter to Corinth. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1977.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. “Letters to Lucilius.” In Seneca, edited by Costa, C. D. N.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974: 70–95.Google Scholar
Sambursky, S., ed. and trans. Physics of the Stoics. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Sanders, J. T. “The Transition from Opening Epistolary Thanksgiving to Body in the Letters of the Pauline Corpus.” Journal of Biblical Literature 81 (1962): 348–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, J. T.“First Corinthians 13: Its Interpretation Since the First World War.” Interpretation 20 (1966): 159–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandmel, Samuel. “Parallelomania.” Journal of Biblical Literature 81 (1962): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Traugott. Der Leib Christi. Leipzig: A. Deichert, 1919.Google Scholar
Schmithals, Walter. Gnosticism in Corinth. Translated by John E. Steely. Nashville: Abingdon, 1971.Google Scholar
Schnackenburg, Rudolf. Baptism in the Thought of St. Paul. Translated by G. R. Beasley-Murray. New York: Herder and Herder, 1964.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm. The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Fiorenza, Schüssler E. “Rhetorical Situation and Historical Reconstruction in 1 Corinthians.” New Testament Studies 33 (1987): 386–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, Albert. The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1956.Google Scholar
Schweizer, Edward. “σω ̑μα, κτλ.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 VII: 1024–94.
Scroggs, R. “The Exaltation of the Spirit by Some Early Christians.” Journal of Biblical Literature 84 (1965): 359–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scroggs, R.The Last Adam. London: Basil Blackwell, 1966.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. “The Stoic–Platonist Debate on kathêkonta.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999: 128–52.Google Scholar
Sevenster, J. N.Paul and Seneca. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit. J. “Argument and Genre of 1 Corinthians 12–14.” In Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press, 1993: 211–30.Google Scholar
Smith, D. Moody. “Glossolalia and Other Spiritual Gifts in a New Testament Perspective.” Interpretation 28 (1974): 307–20.Google Scholar
Smith, Jonathan Z. “The Social Description of Early Christianity.” Religious Studies Review 1 (1975): 19–25.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., and Richard Machalek. “The Convert as a Social Type.” In Sociological Theory, edited by Collins, Randall. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983: 259–89.Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich. “Nature as Craftsman in Greek Thought.” Journal of the History of Ideas 24 (1963): 473–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling, Gregory E. “‘Wisdom among the Perfect’: Creation Traditions in Alexandrian Judaism and Corinthian Christianity.” Novum Testamentum 37 (1995): 355–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling, Gregory E.“The Bond of Humanity: Friendship in Philo of Alexandria.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Society of Biblical Literature Resources for Biblical Study 34. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997: 203–23.Google Scholar
Sterling, Gregory E.“Hellenistic Philosophy and the New Testament.” In Handbook to Exegesis of the New Testament, edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997: 313–58.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley. Letter Writing in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley.“Friends and Enemies in the Politics of Heaven: Reading Theology in Philippians.” In Pauline Theology, edited by Bassler, Jouette M.. Vol. I. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991: 105–21.Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela. “The Role of Oikeiosis in Stoic Ethics.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1 (1983): 145–68.Google Scholar
Stuhlmacher, P. “The Hermeneutical Significance of 1 Cor 2:6–16.” In Tradition and Interpretation in the New Testament: Essays in Honor of E. Earle Ellis for His 60th Birthday, edited by Hawthorne, Gerald F. and Betz, Otto. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987: 328–47.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles. “Paul's Understanding of the Holy Spirit: The Evidence of 1 Corinthians 12–14.” In Perspectives on the New Testament, edited by Talbert, Charles H.. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1985: 95–108.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles. Reading Corinthians. New York: Crossroad, 1987.Google Scholar
Taylor, Nicholas H. “The Social Nature of Conversion in the Early Christian World.” In Modelling Early Christianity, edited by Esler, Philip F.. London: Routledge, 1995: 128–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrien, Samuel. The Elusive Presence: The Heart of Biblical Theology. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1978.Google Scholar
Theissen, Gerd. The Social Setting of Pauline Christianity: Essays on Corinth. Edited and translated by Schütz, John H.. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982.Google Scholar
Thiselton, Anthony C.The First Epistle to the Corinthians. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar
Thrall, Margaret. I and II Corinthians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Todd, Robert B.Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1976.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Unnik, W. C. van. “Jesus: Anathema or Kyrios (1 Cor. 12:3).” In Christ and Spirit in the New Testament, edited by Lindars, Barnabus and Smalley, Stephen S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973: 113–26.Google Scholar
Verbeke, G.L'évolution de la doctrine de pneuma. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1945.Google Scholar
Vielhauer, Philipp. Oikodome: Das Bild vom Bau in der christlichen Literatur vom Neuen Testament bis Clemens Alexandrinus. Karlsruhe-Durlach: Tron, 1940.Google Scholar
Viner, Leigh Clasby. “Moral Paradigms and the Stoic Sage.” Ph.D. diss., Duquesne University, 2002.
Vollenweider, Samuel. Freiheit als neue Schöpfung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Matthias. Gemeinde als Leib Christi. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2001.Google Scholar
Wardman, Alan. Plutarch's Lives. Berkeley: University of California, 1974.Google Scholar
Watson, Duane. “Paul's Rhetorical Strategy in 1 Corinthians 15.” In Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press, 1993: 231–49.Google Scholar
Welborn, L. L. “On the Discord in Corinth: 1 Corinthians 1–4 and Ancient Politics.” Journal of Biblical Literature 106 (1987): 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, John. “Introductory Formulae in the Body of the Pauline Letter.” Journal of Biblical Literature 90 (1971): 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. Michael. “Morality between Two Worlds: A Paradigm of Friendship in Philippians.” In Greeks, Romans, and Christians, edited by Balch, D. L., Ferguson, E., and Meeks, W. A.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990: 201–15.Google Scholar
White, Michael J. “Stoic Natural Philosophy (Physics and Cosmology).” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 124–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Nicholas P. “The Basis of Stoic Ethics.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 83 (1979): 143–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikenhauser, Alfred. Die Kirche als der mystische Leib Christi nach dem Apostel Paulus. Münster: Aschendorff, 1937.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Ulrich. Der Glaube der Hellenen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1955.Google Scholar
Willis, Wendell Lee. Idol Meat at Corinth. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Winter, Bruce. Philo and Paul among the Sophists. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Wire, Antoinette. The Corinthian Women Prophets. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar
Wischmeyer, O.Der höchste Weg. Das 13. Kapitel des 1. Korintherbriefes. Gutersloh: Gutersloher Verlagshaus, 1981.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben III. Conflict and Community in Corinth. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Der erste Brief des Paulus an die Korinther. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1996.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. “ἁρπαγμός and the Meaning of Philippians 2:5–11.” Journal of Theological Studies 37 (1986): 321–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, N. T.“Paul's Gospel and Caesar's Empire.” In Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation, edited by Horsley, Richard A.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 2000: 160–83.Google Scholar
Wuellner, W. “Greek Rhetoric and Pauline Argumentation.” In Early Christian Literature and the Classical Intellectual Tradition: In honorem Robert Grant, edited by Schoedel, W. F. and Wilken, R. L.. Paris: Editions Beauchesne, 1979: 177–88.Google Scholar
Wuellner, W.“Paul as Pastor. The Function of Rhetorical Questions in First Corinthians.” In L'apôtre Paul: personnalité, style, et conception du ministère, edited by Vanhoye, A.. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1986: 49–77.Google Scholar
Yorke, Gosnell L. O. R.The Church as the Body of Christ in the Pauline Corpus. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1991.Google Scholar
Zerwick, M.Biblical Greek. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1963.Google Scholar
Aelius Aristides: The Complete Works. Vol. II: Orations XVII–LIII. Edited by Behr, Charles A. P.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1981.Google Scholar
Ancient Epistolary Theorists. Edited by Malherbe, Abraham J.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Translated by Tredennick, Hughet al. 23 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926–91.Google Scholar
Athenaeus. Deipnosophists. Translated by Gulick, Charles Burton. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927–41.Google Scholar
The Authorised Daily Prayer Book. Translated by Singer, S.. New York: Bloch Publishing Co., 1962.Google Scholar
Cicero. Translated by Keyes, C. W.et al. 29 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913–99.Google Scholar
Demosthenes. Translated by Vince, J. H.et al. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926–49.Google Scholar
Dio Chrysostom. Translated by Crosby, H. Lamaret al. 5 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1932–51.Google Scholar
Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Translated by Hicks, R. H.. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1950–54.Google Scholar
Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Roman Antiquities. Translated by Cary, Ernest. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1943–56.Google Scholar
Epictetus. Translated by Oldfather, W. A.. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995–96.Google Scholar
The Hellenistic Philosophers. Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N.. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Isocrates. Translated by Norlin, George and Hook, Larue. 3 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954–56.Google Scholar
Josephus. Translated by Thackeray, H. St. J.et al. 10 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926–65.Google Scholar
Later Greek Religion. Edited by Bevan, Edwyn. London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd., 1926.Google Scholar
Livy. History of Rome. Translated by Foster, B. O.et al. 14 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1919–59.Google Scholar
Lucan, . The Civil War. Translated by J. D. Duff. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Lucian. Translated by Harmon, A. M. and MacLeod, M. D.. 8 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913–67.Google Scholar
4 Maccabees. In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. Translated by H. Anderson, edited by Charlesworth, James H.. Vol. II. New York: Doubleday, 1985: 531–64.Google Scholar
Manilius. Astronomica. Translated by Goold, G. P.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Marcus Aurelius. Translated by Haines, C. R.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Pausanius. Description of Greece. Translated by Jones, W. H. S. and Ormerod, H. A.. 5 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1918–35.Google Scholar
Philo. Translated by Colson, F. H. and Whitaker, G. H.. 12 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929–62.Google Scholar
Plato. Translated by Fowler, H. N.et al. 12 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914–39.Google Scholar
Plutarch. The Parallel Lives. Translated by Perrin, Bernadotte. 11 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914–26.Google Scholar
Plutarch.Moralia. Translated by Babbitt, Frank Coleet al. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927–69.Google Scholar
Physics of the Stoics. Edited and translated by Sambursky, S.. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Libanius. “Epistolary Styles.” In Ancient Epistolary Theorists, edited by Malherbe, Abraham J.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988: 66–81.Google Scholar
Quintilian. The Institutio Oratoria. Translated by Butler, H. E.. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Seneca. Translated by Gummere, Richard M.et al. 10 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1917–72.Google Scholar
Sextus Empiricus. Translated by Bury, R. G.. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933–49.Google Scholar
Ioannis Stobaei: Anthologium. Wachsmuth, Curtis and Hense, Otto. 5 vols. Berlin: Weidmann, 1894–1912.Google Scholar
Strabo. Geography. Translated by Jones, Horace Leonard. 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1917–32.Google Scholar
Thucydides. History of the Peloponnesian War. Translated by Smith, Charles Foster. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1919–23.Google Scholar
Xenophon. Translated by Brownson, Carleton L.et al. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914–23.Google Scholar
Aletti, J.-N. “La dispositio rhétorique dans les épitres pauliniennes. Proposition de méthode.” New Testament Studies 38 (1992): 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, Keimpe. “Stoic Theology.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 153–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson H. 4 Maccabees. In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, edited by Charlesworth, James H.. Vol. II. New York: Doubleday, 1985: 531–64.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. Dean Jr. Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Paul. Kampen: Kok Pharos Publishing House, 1996.Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. “‘Domina et Regina Virtutum’: Justice and Societas in De Officiis.” Phronesis 35 (1990): 258–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baasland, E. “Die περί -Formel und die Argumentation(ssituation) des Paulus.” Studia theologica 42 (1988): 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, David L. “The Interpretation of 1 Cor. 12–14.” Evangelical Quarterly 46 (1974): 224–34.Google Scholar
Baldry, H. C.The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Barbour, Robin S. “Wisdom and the Cross in 1 Corinthians 1 and 2.” In Theologia Crucis – Signum Crucis: Festschrift für Erich Dinkler, edited by Andresen, Carl and Klein, Günter. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1979: 57–71.Google Scholar
Barlow, Claude W.Epistolae Senecae ad Paulum et Pauli ad Senecam <quae vocantur>. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 10. Horn, Austria: Ferdinand Berger, 1938.Google Scholar
Barrett, C. K.The First Epistle to the Corinthians. London: Adam & Charles Black, 1968. (Repr., Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1996.)Google Scholar
Barton, S. C. “Paul's Sense of Place: An Anthropological Approach to Community Formation in Corinth.” New Testament Studies 32 (1986): 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassler, Jouette M. “1 Cor. 12:3 – Curse and Confession in Context.” Journal of Biblical Literature 101 (1982): 415–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Beasley G. R.Baptism in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar
Bertram, G. “νήπιος, νηπιάζω.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 IV: 912–23.
Best, Ernest. One Body in Christ. London: SPCK, 1955.Google Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter. Galatians. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979.Google Scholar
Bittlinger, A.Gifts and Graces: A Commentary on 1 Cor. 12–14. Translated by H. Klassen. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1968.Google Scholar
Blundell, Mary Whitlock. “Parental Nature and Stoic οἰκείωσις.” Ancient Philosophy 10 (1990): 221–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodson, Arthur. La morale sociale des derniers Stoîciens, Sénèque, Epictète et Marc Aurèle. Paris: Société d'Edition Les Belles Lettres, 1967.Google Scholar
Bonhöffer, Adolf. The Ethics of the Stoic Epictetus. Translated by William O. Stephens. New York: Peter Lang, 1996.Google Scholar
Bornkamm, Günther. Paul. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1971.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, George. “Eros in Government: Zeno and the Virtuous City.” Classical Quarterly 48 (1998): 168–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braaten, C. E.Eschatology and Ethics. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1974.Google Scholar
Bringmann, K.Untersuchungen zum späten Cicero. Hypomnemata 29. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Alexandra R.The Cross & Human Transformation. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995.Google Scholar
Bruce, F. F.1 and 2 Corinthians. London: Oliphants, 1971.Google Scholar
Bruce, F. F.1 & 2 Thessalonians. Word Biblical Commentary 45. Waco, TX: Word, 1982.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques. “The Stoic Theory of the Supreme Genus and Platonic Ontology.” In Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy, translated by Janet Lloyd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 92–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunt, P. A. “‘Amicitia’ in the Late Roman Republic.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 191 (1965): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunt, P. A.“Stoicism and the Principate.” Papers of the British School at Rome 43 (1975): 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament. 2 vols. Translated by Kendrick Grobel. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1954–55.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf.“The Problem of Ethics in Paul.” In Understanding Paul's Ethics, edited by Rosner, Brian S.; translated by Christoph W. Stenschke. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995: 195–216.Google Scholar
Bünker, M.Briefformular und rhetorische Disposition im 1 Korintherbrief.Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1984.Google Scholar
Burgess, Theodore. Epideictic Literature. Studies in Classical Philology 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1902.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. Y. “Κοινωνία and Its Cognates in the New Testament.” Journal of Biblical Literature 51 (1932): 352–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancik, Hildegaard. Untersuchungen zu Senecas Epistulae morales. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1967.Google Scholar
Carson, D. A.Showing the Spirit: A Theological Exposition of 1 Corinthians 12–14. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1987.Google Scholar
Cerfaux, L.The Church in the Theology of St. Paul. New York: Herder and Herder, 1959.Google Scholar
Chevallier, Max-Alain. Esprit de Dieu, parole d'hommes. Neuchatel: Delachaux & Niestlé, 1966.Google Scholar
Clements, Ronald. God and Temple. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1965.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L.The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. Vol. II: Stoicism in Christian Latin Thought through the Sixth Century. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1990.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L.“Stoicism and the New Testament: An Essay in Historiography.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York, 1992 26.1 (1992): 334–79.Google Scholar
Collins, John J. “Chiasmus, the ‘ABA’ Pattern and the Text of Paul.” In Studiorum Paulinorum Congressus Internationalis Catholicus 2 (1963): 575–83.Google Scholar
Collins, Raymond F.First Corinthians. Sacra Pagina 7. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Conger, George Perrigo. Theories of Macrocosms and Microcosms in the History of Philosophy. New York: Russell & Russell, 1967.Google Scholar
Conzelmann, Hans. 1 Corinthians. Translated by J. W. Leitch. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1975.Google Scholar
Cousar, Charles. “The Theological Task of 1 Corinthians: A Conversation with Gordon D. Fee and Victor Paul Furnish.” In Pauline Theology, edited by Bassler, Jouette M.. Vol. II. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993: 90–102.Google Scholar
Cranfield, C. E. B.A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. 2 vols. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1975.Google Scholar
Cuming, G. J. “ΕΠΟΤΙΣΘΗΜΕΝ (1 Corinthians 12,13).” New Testament Studies 27 (1981): 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Nils Alstrup. Studies in Paul. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1977.Google Scholar
Daines, Brian. “Paul's Use of the Analogy of the Body of Christ.” Evangelical Quarterly 50 (1978): 71–78.Google Scholar
Davies, W. D.Paul and Rabbinic Judaism. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980.Google Scholar
Broglie, G. “Le texte fondamentale de Saint Paul contre la foi naturelle.” Recherches de Science Religieuse 39 (1951): 253–66.Google Scholar
Deidun, T. J.New Covenant Morality. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Delling, G. “τέλειος.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 VII: 67–79.
Derrett, J. D. M. “Cursing Jesus (1 Cor. XII.3): The Jews as Religious ‘Persecutors.’ ” New Testament Studies 21 (1975): 544–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deSilva, David. “Paul and the Stoa: A Comparison.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 38 (1995): 549–64.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. The Middle Platonists. Ithaca: Cornell, 1977.Google Scholar
Dodd, C. H.Gospel and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Dodd, Brian. Paul's Paradigmatic “I”: Personal Example as Literary Strategy. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 177. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. Natural Symbols: Exploration in Cosmology. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982.Google Scholar
du Plessis, P. J.ΤΕΛΕΙΟΣ, The Idea of Perfection in the New Testament. Kampen: J. H. Kok, 1959.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G.Baptism in the Holy Spirit. London: SCM Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G.“‘The Body of Christ’ in Paul.” In Worship, Theology and Ministry in the Early Church, edited by Wilkins, Michael J. and Paige, Terence. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1992: 146–62.Google Scholar
Dyck, Andrew R.A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Ellingworth, Paul and Hatton, Howard. A Translator's Handbook on Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians. London: United Bible Societies, 1985.Google Scholar
Elliot, John. A Home for the Homeless. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1981.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. “Discovering the Good: oikeiōsis and kathēkonta in Stoic Ethics.” In The Norms of Nature, edited by Schofield, Malcolm and Striker, Gisela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 145–83.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels.“The Gospel and Social Practice According to 1 Corinthians.” New Testament Studies 33 (1987): 557–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels.The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis. Denmark: Aarhus University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels.Paul and the Stoics. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 2000.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Anders. Traditions as Rhetorical Proof. Coniectanea Biblica New Testament Series 27. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International, 1998.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D.The First Epistle to the Corinthians. New International Commentary on the New Testament Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D.Paul's Letter to the Philippians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar
Fiore, Benjamin SJ.The Function of Personal Example in the Socratic and Pastoral Epistles. Analecta biblica 105. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Fiore, Benjamin, SJ.“The Theory and Practice of Friendship in Cicero.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997: 59–76.Google Scholar
Fiske, Adele M. “Hieronymus Ciceronianus.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 96 (1965): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, John T. “Philippians in the Light of Some Ancient Discussions on Friendship.” In Friendship, Flattery and Frankness of Speech: Studies on Friendship in the New Testament World, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996: 141–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A., SJ. Romans. Anchor Bible 33. New York: Doubleday, 1993.Google Scholar
Fraisse, J. C.“Philia”: La notion d'amitié dans la philosophie antique. Essai sur un problème perdu et retrouvé. Paris: Librairie J. Vrin, 1974.Google Scholar
Furnish, Victor Paul. Theology and Ethics in Paul. Nashville: Abingdon, 1968.Google Scholar
Furnish, Victor Paul. II Corinthians. Anchor Bible 32A. New York: Doubleday, 1984.Google Scholar
Gale, Herbert W.The Use of Analogy in the Letters of Paul. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Garland, David E.1 Corinthians. Baker Exegetical Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2003.Google Scholar
Gärtner, B.The Temple and the Community Qumran and the New Testament. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgi, Dieter. Theocracy in Paul's Praxis and Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991.Google Scholar
Giblin, Charles Homer. In Hope of God's Glory: Pauline Theological Perspectives. New York: Herder and Herder, 1970.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher. “Personhood and Personality: The Four Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis I.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6 (1988): 169–99.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher.“The School in the Roman Imperial Period.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glad, Clarence. Paul and Philodemus: Adaptability in Epicurean and Early Christian Psychagogy. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goppelt, L.Theology of the New Testament. 2 vols. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981–82.Google Scholar
Grant, Robert M. “Hellenistic Elements in 1 Corinthians.” In Early Christian Origins, edited by Wikgren, Allen. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1961: 60–66.Google Scholar
Gressman, H. “Ν ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΙΩΝ.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 29 (1921): 224–30.Google Scholar
Grindheim, Sigurd: “Wisdom for the Perfect: Paul's Challenge to the Corinthian Church (1 Corinthians 2:6–16).” Journal of Biblical Literature (2002): 689–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundry, Robert H.SOMA in Biblical Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, George. The Structure of Hebrews: A Text-Linguistic Analysis. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadas, Moses, ed. and trans. The Third and Fourth Book of Maccabees. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1953.Google Scholar
Hadot, Ilsestraut. Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleitung. Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie 13. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahm, David E.The Origins of Stoic Cosmology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hainz, Josef. Ekklesia. Regensburg: Pustet, 1972.Google Scholar
Halliwell, Stephen. “Popular Morality, Philosophical Ethics, and the Rhetoric.” In Aristotle's Rhetoric, edited by Furley, David J. and Nehamas, Alexander. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994: 211–30.Google Scholar
Halliwell, Stephen.“The Challenge of Rhetoric to Political and Ethical Theory in Aristotle.” In Essays of Aristotle's Rhetoric, edited by Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996: 175–90.Google Scholar
Hauck, F. “κοινός, κτλ.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 III: 789–809.
Hawthorne, Gerald. Philippians. Word Biblical Commentary. Waco, TX: Word, 1983.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc'h, J.Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des parties politiques sous la République. Paris: Société d'Edition les Belles Lettres, 1963.Google Scholar
Hellerman, Joseph H.Reconstructing Honor in Roman Philippi: Carmen Christi as Cursus Pudorum. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hengel, Martin. Crucifixion. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977.Google Scholar
Hill, Andrew. “The Temple of Asclepius: An Alternative Source for Paul's Body Theology?” Journal of Biblical Literature 99 (1980): 437–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Forbes. “The Amorality of Aristotle's Rhetoric.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 22 (1981): 133–47.Google Scholar
Holladay, Carl R. “1 Corinthians 13: Paul as Apostolic Paradigm.” In Greeks, Romans, and Christians, edited by Balch, David L., Ferguson, Everett, Meeks, Wayne A.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990: 80–98.Google Scholar
Hoover, Roy W. “The Harpagmos Enigma: A Philological Solution.” Harvard Theological Review 64 (1971): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsley, Richard A. “1 Corinthians: A Case Study of Paul's Assembly as an Alternative Society.” In Paul and Empire: Religion and Power in Roman Imperial Society, edited by Horsley, Richard A.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 1997: 242–52.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard A.Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 2000.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard A.“Rhetoric and Empire – 1 Corinthians.” In Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation, edited by Horsley, Richard A.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 2000: 72–102.Google Scholar
Hurd, John C.The Origin of 1 Corinthians. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Hurtado, L. W. “Jesus as Lordly Example in Philippians 2:5–11.” In From Jesus to Paul, edited by Richardson, Peter and Hurd, John C.. Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1984: 113–26.Google Scholar
Iber, Gerhard. “Zum Verständnis von I Cor. 12:31.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 54 (1963): 43–52.Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad. “Comments on Professor Görgemanns' Paper: The Two Forms of Oikeiōsis in Arius and the Stoa.” In On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus, edited by Fortenbaugh, W. W.. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1983: 190–201.Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad. “Hierocles: Theory and Argument in the Second Century AD.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2 (1984): 151–83.Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad.“Seneca and Psychological Dualism.” In Passions & Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, edited by Brunschwig, Jacques and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993: 150–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Brad.“Rules and Reasoning in Stoic Ethics.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999: 95–127.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. “Stoic and Aristotelian Conceptions of Happiness.” In The Norms of Nature, edited by Schofield, Malcolm and Striker, Gisela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 205–44.Google Scholar
Jewett, Robert. Paul's Anthropological Terms: A Study of Their Use in Conflict Settings. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1971.Google Scholar
Johnston, G.The Doctrine of the Church in the New Testament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
Joly, Robert. Le vocabulaire chrétien de l'amour, est-il original?Brussels: Universitaires de Bruxelles, 1968.Google Scholar
Judge, E. A. “Paul as Radical Critic of Society.” Interchange 16 (1974): 191–203.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. Leib und Leib Christi. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1933.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. Perspectives in Paul. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1971.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. Essays on New Testament Themes. Translated by W. J. Montague. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A.The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A.Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A.New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, I. G. “Moral Actions and Rules in Stoic Ethics.” In The Stoics, edited by Rist, John M.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978: 247–58.Google Scholar
Kim, Seyoon. The Origin of Paul's Gospel. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1984.Google Scholar
Klauck, Hans-Josef. “Brotherly Love in Plutarch and in 4 Maccabees.” In Greeks, Romans, and Christians, edited by Balch, David L., Ferguson, Everett, and Meeks, Wayne A.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990: 144–56.Google Scholar
Knox, W. L. “Parallels to the N. T. Use of σω ̑μα.” Journal of Theological Studies 39 (1938): 243–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, W. L.Paul and the Church of the Gentiles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Konstan, David. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Werner. Christ, Lord, Son of God. Naperville: Alec R. Allenson, 1966.Google Scholar
Kümmel, W. G.Theology of the New Testament. London: SCM Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Lapidge, Michael. “Stoic Cosmology.” In The Stoics, edited by Rist, John M.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978: 161–85.Google Scholar
Lapidge, Michael. “Lucan's Imagery of Cosmic Dissolution.” Hermes 107 (1979): 344–70.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Andrew. Paradise Now and Not Yet. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litfin, Duane. St. Paul's Theology of Proclamation. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Long, A. A.. “The Stoic Concept of Evil.” Philosophical Quarterly 18 (1968): 329–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A.. Soul and Body in Stoicism. Berkeley: Center for Hermeneutical Studies, 1980.Google Scholar
Long, A. A.. “Soul and Body in Stoicism.” Phronesis 27 (1982): 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. “Stoic Eudaimonism.” In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, edited by Cleary, John J.. Vol. IV. Lanham: University Press of America, 1988: 77–101.Google Scholar
Longenecker, R. N.Paul: Apostle of Liberty. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1977.Google Scholar
Mack, B.Rhetoric and the NT. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J. “Antisthenes and Odysseus, and Paul at War.” Harvard Theological Review 76 (1983): 143–73.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J.“Exhortation in First Thessalonians.” Novum Testamentum 25 (1983): 238–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J.Paul and the Thessalonians. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1987.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J.Paul and the Popular Philosophers. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J.“Hellenistic Moralists and the New Testament.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York, 1992 26.1 (1992) 267–33.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. “Providence and the Destruction of the Universe in Early Stoic Thought.” In Studies in Hellenistic Religions, edited by Vermaseren, M. J.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1979: 129–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson, T. W. “A Parallel to a N.T. Use of σω ̑μα.” Journal of Theological Studies 37 (1936): 385.Google Scholar
Manson, T. W.On Jesus and Paul. London: SCM Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Marrou, H.A History of Education in Antiquity. Translated by George Lamb. New York: Sheed & Ward, 1956.Google Scholar
Marshall, Peter. Enmity in Corinth: Social Conventions in Paul's Relations with the Corinthians. Tübingen: Mohr, 1987.Google Scholar
Martin, Dale. “Tongues of Angels and Other Status Indicators.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 59 (1991): 547–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Dale.The Corinthian Body. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Martin, Ralph P.Carmen Christi. Philippians 2:5–11 in Recent Interpretation and in the Setting of Early Christian Worship. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Ralph P.The Spirit and the Congregation: Studies in 1 Corinthians 12–15. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1984.Google Scholar
Martin, Ralph P.2 Corinthians. Word Biblical Commentary 40. Waco, TX: Word, 1986.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A. “The Image of the Androgyne: Some Uses of a Symbol in Earliest Christianity.” History of Religions 13 (1974): 165–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A.The First Urban Christians. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A.“‘Since Then You Would Need to Go Out of the World’: Group Boundaries in Pauline Christianity.” In Critical History and Biblical Faith, edited by Ryan, Thomas J.. Villanova, PA: College Theology Society, 1985: 4–29.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A.The Moral World of the First Christians. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul W. “The Holy Spirit in the Pauline Letters.” Interpretation 33 (1979): 3–18.Google Scholar
Michel, O. “ναός.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 IV: 880–90.
Mitchell, Margaret M. “Concerning ΠΕPΙ ΔΕ in 1 Corinthians.” Novum Testamentum 31 (1989): 229–56.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M.Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 1991.Google Scholar
Mitsis, Philip. “Seneca on Reason, Rules, and Moral Development.” In Passions & Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, edited by Brunschwig, Jacques and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993: 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Leon M.1 Corinthians. Leicester: InterVarsity, 1985.Google Scholar
Motto, Anna Lydia. Seneca: Moral Epistles. Chico: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Moule, C. F. D. “Further Reflexions on Philippians 2:5–11.” In Apostolic History and the Gospel. Biblical and Historical Essays Presented to F. F. Bruce, edited by Gasque, W. W. and Martin, R. P.. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1970: 264–76.Google Scholar
Mullins, Terence Y. “Disclosure: A Literary Form in the New Testament.” Novum Testamentum 7 (1964): 44–50.Google Scholar
Mullins, Terence Y.. “Formulas in New Testament Epistles.” Journal of Biblical Literature 91 (1972): 380–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Johannes. Paul and the Salvation of Mankind. Atlanta: John Knox, 1959.Google Scholar
Murphy-O'Connor, Jerome. St. Paul's Corinth. Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1983.Google Scholar
Neufeld, Vernon. The Earliest Christian Confessions. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1963.Google Scholar
Neyrey, Jerome H.Paul, In Other Words: A Cultural Reading of His Letters. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 1990.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C.The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Obbink, Dirk. “The Stoic Sage in the Cosmic City.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999: 178–95.Google Scholar
Obbink, Dirk and Vander Waerdt, Paul A.. “Diogenes of Babylon: The Stoic Sage in the City of Fools.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 32 (1991): 355–96.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Peter T.Introductory Thanksgivings in the Letters of Paul. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Peter T.The Epistle to the Philippians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J.Orality and Literacy. London: Methuen, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Catherine. Eros Unveiled: Plato and the God of Love. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar
Panikulam, G.Koinonia in the New Testament, a Dynamic Expression of Christian Life. Analecta biblica. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Parsons, Michael. “Being Precedes Act: Indicative and Imperative in Paul's Writing.” In Understanding Paul's Ethics, edited by Rosner, Brian S.. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995: 217–47. (Reprinted from Evangelical Quarterly 60 [1988]: 99–127.)Google Scholar
Parunak, H. Van Dyke. “Transitional Techniques in the Bible.” Journal of Biblical Literature 102 (1983): 525–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Birger Albert. The Pneumatikos-Psychikos Terminology in 1 Corinthians. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 12. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Perdue, Leo. “Paraenesis and the Epistle of James.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 72 (1981): 241–56.Google Scholar
Perdue, Leo. “The Social Character of Paraenesis and Paraenetic Literature.” Semeia 59 (1990): 5–39.Google Scholar
Perelman, Ch. The Realm of Rhetoric. Translated by William Kluback. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Perelman, Ch. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.. The New Rhetoric. Translated by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Perriman, Andrew. “‘His Body, Which Is the Church …’ Coming to Terms with Metaphor.” Evangelical Quarterly 62 (1990): 123–42.Google Scholar
Pervo, Richard I. “With Lucian: Who Needs Friends? Friendship in the Toxaris.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Society of Biblical Literature Resources for Biblical Study 34. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997: 163–80.Google Scholar
Pogoloff, Stephen M.LOGOS AND SOPHIA: The Rhetorical Situation of 1 Corinthians. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, Max. Paulus und die Stoa (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1956).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “The Theoretical Justification for Application of Rhetorical Categories to Pauline Epistolary Literature.” In Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press, 1993: 100–22.Google Scholar
Rawlinson, A. E. J. “Corpus Christi.” In Mysterium Christi, edited by Bell, G. K. A. and Deissmann, Adolf. London: Longmans, 1930: 225–44.Google Scholar
Reed, Jeffrey T. “The Epistle.” In Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period: 330 B.C.–A.D. 400, edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: Brill, 1997: 171–93.Google Scholar
Renwick, David A.Paul, the Temple, and the Presence of God. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato's Timaeus. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rich, Audrey N. M. “The Platonic Ideas as the Thoughts of God.” Mnemosyne 7 (1954): 123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, J. M. “Categories and Their Uses.” In Problems in Stoicism, edited by Long, A. A.. London: Athlone Press, 1971: 38–57.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M.“Seneca and Stoic Orthodoxy.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York, 1992 36.3 (1989) 1993–2012.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M.“Plutarch's Amatorius: A Commentary on Plato's Theories of Love?” Classical Quarterly 51 (2001): 557–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. and Plummer, A.. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the First Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians. International Critical Commentary. T. & T. Clark: Edinburgh, 1994.Google Scholar
Robinson, John A. T.The Body. London: SCM Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. R. “ΕΠΟΤΙΣΘΗΜΕΝ Again.” New Testament Studies 29 (1983): 139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, G. M. “Seneca's Philosophical Influence.” In Seneca, edited by Costa, C. D. N.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974: 116–65.Google Scholar
Ruef, John. Paul's First Letter to Corinth. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1977.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. “Letters to Lucilius.” In Seneca, edited by Costa, C. D. N.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974: 70–95.Google Scholar
Sambursky, S., ed. and trans. Physics of the Stoics. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Sanders, J. T. “The Transition from Opening Epistolary Thanksgiving to Body in the Letters of the Pauline Corpus.” Journal of Biblical Literature 81 (1962): 348–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, J. T.“First Corinthians 13: Its Interpretation Since the First World War.” Interpretation 20 (1966): 159–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandmel, Samuel. “Parallelomania.” Journal of Biblical Literature 81 (1962): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Traugott. Der Leib Christi. Leipzig: A. Deichert, 1919.Google Scholar
Schmithals, Walter. Gnosticism in Corinth. Translated by John E. Steely. Nashville: Abingdon, 1971.Google Scholar
Schnackenburg, Rudolf. Baptism in the Thought of St. Paul. Translated by G. R. Beasley-Murray. New York: Herder and Herder, 1964.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm. The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Fiorenza, Schüssler E. “Rhetorical Situation and Historical Reconstruction in 1 Corinthians.” New Testament Studies 33 (1987): 386–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, Albert. The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1956.Google Scholar
Schweizer, Edward. “σω ̑μα, κτλ.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 VII: 1024–94.
Scroggs, R. “The Exaltation of the Spirit by Some Early Christians.” Journal of Biblical Literature 84 (1965): 359–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scroggs, R.The Last Adam. London: Basil Blackwell, 1966.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. “The Stoic–Platonist Debate on kathêkonta.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999: 128–52.Google Scholar
Sevenster, J. N.Paul and Seneca. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit. J. “Argument and Genre of 1 Corinthians 12–14.” In Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press, 1993: 211–30.Google Scholar
Smith, D. Moody. “Glossolalia and Other Spiritual Gifts in a New Testament Perspective.” Interpretation 28 (1974): 307–20.Google Scholar
Smith, Jonathan Z. “The Social Description of Early Christianity.” Religious Studies Review 1 (1975): 19–25.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., and Richard Machalek. “The Convert as a Social Type.” In Sociological Theory, edited by Collins, Randall. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983: 259–89.Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich. “Nature as Craftsman in Greek Thought.” Journal of the History of Ideas 24 (1963): 473–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling, Gregory E. “‘Wisdom among the Perfect’: Creation Traditions in Alexandrian Judaism and Corinthian Christianity.” Novum Testamentum 37 (1995): 355–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling, Gregory E.“The Bond of Humanity: Friendship in Philo of Alexandria.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Society of Biblical Literature Resources for Biblical Study 34. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997: 203–23.Google Scholar
Sterling, Gregory E.“Hellenistic Philosophy and the New Testament.” In Handbook to Exegesis of the New Testament, edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997: 313–58.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley. Letter Writing in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley.“Friends and Enemies in the Politics of Heaven: Reading Theology in Philippians.” In Pauline Theology, edited by Bassler, Jouette M.. Vol. I. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991: 105–21.Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela. “The Role of Oikeiosis in Stoic Ethics.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1 (1983): 145–68.Google Scholar
Stuhlmacher, P. “The Hermeneutical Significance of 1 Cor 2:6–16.” In Tradition and Interpretation in the New Testament: Essays in Honor of E. Earle Ellis for His 60th Birthday, edited by Hawthorne, Gerald F. and Betz, Otto. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987: 328–47.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles. “Paul's Understanding of the Holy Spirit: The Evidence of 1 Corinthians 12–14.” In Perspectives on the New Testament, edited by Talbert, Charles H.. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1985: 95–108.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles. Reading Corinthians. New York: Crossroad, 1987.Google Scholar
Taylor, Nicholas H. “The Social Nature of Conversion in the Early Christian World.” In Modelling Early Christianity, edited by Esler, Philip F.. London: Routledge, 1995: 128–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrien, Samuel. The Elusive Presence: The Heart of Biblical Theology. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1978.Google Scholar
Theissen, Gerd. The Social Setting of Pauline Christianity: Essays on Corinth. Edited and translated by Schütz, John H.. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982.Google Scholar
Thiselton, Anthony C.The First Epistle to the Corinthians. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar
Thrall, Margaret. I and II Corinthians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Todd, Robert B.Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1976.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Unnik, W. C. van. “Jesus: Anathema or Kyrios (1 Cor. 12:3).” In Christ and Spirit in the New Testament, edited by Lindars, Barnabus and Smalley, Stephen S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973: 113–26.Google Scholar
Verbeke, G.L'évolution de la doctrine de pneuma. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1945.Google Scholar
Vielhauer, Philipp. Oikodome: Das Bild vom Bau in der christlichen Literatur vom Neuen Testament bis Clemens Alexandrinus. Karlsruhe-Durlach: Tron, 1940.Google Scholar
Viner, Leigh Clasby. “Moral Paradigms and the Stoic Sage.” Ph.D. diss., Duquesne University, 2002.
Vollenweider, Samuel. Freiheit als neue Schöpfung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Matthias. Gemeinde als Leib Christi. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2001.Google Scholar
Wardman, Alan. Plutarch's Lives. Berkeley: University of California, 1974.Google Scholar
Watson, Duane. “Paul's Rhetorical Strategy in 1 Corinthians 15.” In Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press, 1993: 231–49.Google Scholar
Welborn, L. L. “On the Discord in Corinth: 1 Corinthians 1–4 and Ancient Politics.” Journal of Biblical Literature 106 (1987): 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, John. “Introductory Formulae in the Body of the Pauline Letter.” Journal of Biblical Literature 90 (1971): 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. Michael. “Morality between Two Worlds: A Paradigm of Friendship in Philippians.” In Greeks, Romans, and Christians, edited by Balch, D. L., Ferguson, E., and Meeks, W. A.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990: 201–15.Google Scholar
White, Michael J. “Stoic Natural Philosophy (Physics and Cosmology).” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 124–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Nicholas P. “The Basis of Stoic Ethics.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 83 (1979): 143–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikenhauser, Alfred. Die Kirche als der mystische Leib Christi nach dem Apostel Paulus. Münster: Aschendorff, 1937.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Ulrich. Der Glaube der Hellenen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1955.Google Scholar
Willis, Wendell Lee. Idol Meat at Corinth. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Winter, Bruce. Philo and Paul among the Sophists. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Wire, Antoinette. The Corinthian Women Prophets. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar
Wischmeyer, O.Der höchste Weg. Das 13. Kapitel des 1. Korintherbriefes. Gutersloh: Gutersloher Verlagshaus, 1981.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben III. Conflict and Community in Corinth. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Der erste Brief des Paulus an die Korinther. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1996.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. “ἁρπαγμός and the Meaning of Philippians 2:5–11.” Journal of Theological Studies 37 (1986): 321–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, N. T.“Paul's Gospel and Caesar's Empire.” In Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation, edited by Horsley, Richard A.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 2000: 160–83.Google Scholar
Wuellner, W. “Greek Rhetoric and Pauline Argumentation.” In Early Christian Literature and the Classical Intellectual Tradition: In honorem Robert Grant, edited by Schoedel, W. F. and Wilken, R. L.. Paris: Editions Beauchesne, 1979: 177–88.Google Scholar
Wuellner, W.“Paul as Pastor. The Function of Rhetorical Questions in First Corinthians.” In L'apôtre Paul: personnalité, style, et conception du ministère, edited by Vanhoye, A.. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1986: 49–77.Google Scholar
Yorke, Gosnell L. O. R.The Church as the Body of Christ in the Pauline Corpus. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1991.Google Scholar
Zerwick, M.Biblical Greek. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1963.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Michelle V. Lee, Biola University, California
  • Book: Paul, the Stoics, and the Body of Christ
  • Online publication: 23 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584541.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Michelle V. Lee, Biola University, California
  • Book: Paul, the Stoics, and the Body of Christ
  • Online publication: 23 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584541.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Michelle V. Lee, Biola University, California
  • Book: Paul, the Stoics, and the Body of Christ
  • Online publication: 23 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584541.009
Available formats
×