Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:22:23.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2020

Hérica Valladares
Hérica Valladares
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Painting, Poetry, and the Invention of Tenderness in the Early Roman Empire , pp. 223 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Affleck, M. 2013. “Priests, Patrons, and Playwrights: Libraries in Rome before 168 bce,” in König, Oikonomopoulou, and Woolf 2013: 124–36.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. 1993. Stanzas: Word and Phantasm in Western Culture (trans. Martinez, R.). Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Allen, A. W. 1962. “Sunt Qui Propertium Malint,” in Sullivan 1962: 107–48.Google Scholar
Allison, P. 1992. “The Relationship between Decoration and Room Type in Pompeian Houses: A Case Study of the Casa della Caccia Antica,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 5: 235–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, P. and Sear, F.. 2002. Casa della Caccia Antica (VII 4, 48) (Häuser in Pompeji 11). Munich.Google Scholar
Alroth, B. and Scheffer, C. eds. 2014. Attitudes towards the Past in Antiquity: Creating Identities. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Ancona, R. and Greene, E. eds. 2005. Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R., Parsons, P., and Nisbet, R.. 1979. “Elegiacs by Gallus from Qaṣr Ibrîm,” Journal of Roman Studies 69: 125–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreae, B. 1969. “Stuckreliefs und Fresken der Farnesina,” in Helbig 1969: 430–52.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. and Presicce, C. P. eds. 1996. Ulisse: il mito e la memoria. Rome.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. 2010. Intimità a Pompei. Riservatezza, condivisione e prestigio negli ambienti ad alcova in Pompei. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. ed. 2012. Privata Luxuria. Towards an Archaeology of Intimacy: Pompeii and Beyond. Munich.Google Scholar
Arcellaschi, A. 1990. Médée das le théâtre latin d’Ennius à Sénèque. Rome.Google Scholar
Arkins, B. 2007. “The Modern Reception of Catullus,” in Skinner 2007: 460–78.Google Scholar
Austin, R. 1933. M. Tulli Ciceronis Pro M. Caelio oratio. Oxford.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1966. “The Early Historians,” in Dorey 1966: 1–38.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1972. “Ennius and His Friends,” in Skutsch 1972: 151–99.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1985. “A Phantom Marriage Law,” Philologus 129: 82–98.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. and Cribiore, R. eds. 2006. Women’s Letters from Ancient Egypt, 300 bc–ad 800. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Baldassare, I. 1981. “Piramo e Thisbe: dal mito all’immagine,” Publications de l’école française de Rome 55: 337–51.Google Scholar
Baldassare, I., Pontrandolfo, A., Rouveret, A., and Salvadori, M., 2002. Pittura romana: dall’ellenismo al tardo-antico. Milan.Google Scholar
Barasch, M. 1997. The Language of Art: Studies in Interpretation. New York and London.Google Scholar
Barbet, A. 1985. La peinture murale romaine: Les styles décoratifs pompéiens (reprinted 2009). Paris.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1992. P. Ovidii Nasonis Epistulae Heroidum 1–3. Florence.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1993. “Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion and Ovid’s Heroides,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 333–65.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2001. Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. London.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2004. “Quando Virgilio era un moderno: una delle più antiche recite delle Georgiche, e il contesto di una spiritosaggine,” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 52: 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. ed. 2005. Ovidio Metamorfosi i. Milan.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2006. “Music for Monsters: Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Bucolic Evolution and Bucolic Criticism,” in Fantuzzi and Papanghelis 2006: 403–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. ed. 2007. Ovidio Metamorfosi ii. Milan.Google Scholar
Barringer, J. 1994. “The Mythological Paintings in the Macellum at Pompeii,” Classical Antiquity 13: 149–66.Google Scholar
Bartel, H. and Simon, A. eds. 2010. Unbinding Medea: Interdisciplinary Approaches to a Classical Myth from Antiquity to the 21st Century. London.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1975. The Pleasure of the Text (trans. Miller, R.). New York.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1978. A Lover’s Discourse – Fragments (trans. Howard, R.). New York.Google Scholar
Bartman, E. 2010. “Erotic Statuary in The Roman House,” in Hekster and Mols 2010: 57–66.Google Scholar
Baste, F. L. and De Vos, M. eds. 1979. Proposta per una classificazione del Terzo Stile pompeiano. Archaeologische Studien van het Nederlands Instituut te Rome 4 (The Hague).Google Scholar
Béarat, H. ed. 1997. Roman Wall-Painting: Materials, Techniques, Analysis and Conservation. Proceedings of the International Workshop, Fribourg 7–9 March 1996. Fribourg.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 1993. “Looking (Harder) for Roman Myth: Dumézil, Declamation and the Problems of Definition,” in Graf 1993: 44–64.Google Scholar
Bellandi, F. 2012. “Amour-passion e amore congiugale nella poesia di Catullo: qualche considerazione,” in Morelli 2012: 13–72.Google Scholar
Benefiel, R. 2010. “Dialogues of Ancient Graffiti in the House of Maius Castricius in Pompeii,” American Journal of Archaeology 114: 59–101.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. 1991. “Painted Perspectives of a Villa Visit: Landscape as Status and Metaphor,” in Gazda 1991: 49–70.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. 1994. “The Roman House as Memory Theater: The House of the Tragic Poet in Pompeii,” The Art Bulletin 76: 225–56.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. 1995. “Greek Masterpieces and Roman Recreative Fictions,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 79–120.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. 1996. “The Pregnant Moment: Tragic Wives in the Roman Interior,” in Kampen 1996: 199–219.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. 1999. “Rhythms of Recognition: Mythological Encounters in Roman Landscape Painting,” in De Angelis 1999: 81–108.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. 2012. “The Flight of Icarus in the House of the Priest Amandus in Pompeii,” in Edwards and Bailey 2012: 13–21.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. 2018. “At Face Value: Painted Ladies on Pompeian Walls,” in Longfellow and Perry 2018: 142–65.Google Scholar
Bessone, F. 1997. P. Ovidii Nasonis Heroidum Epistula xii Medea Iasoni. Florence.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. 2000. The Ears of Hermes. Communication, Images, and Identity in the Classical World (trans. Short, W. M.). Columbus.Google Scholar
Beye, C. R. 1982. Epic and Romance in the Argonautica of Apollonius. Carbondale and Edwardsville.Google Scholar
Beyen, H. G. 1948. “Les domini de la Villa de la Farnésine,” Studia Carolo Guilielmo Vollgraff. Amsterdam: 3–21.Google Scholar
Bieber, M. 1961. The Sculpture of the Hellenistic Age. New York.Google Scholar
Bielfeldt, R. 2005. Orestes auf römischen Sarkophagen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Blaiklock, E. M. 1959. The Romanticism of Catullus. Auckland.Google Scholar
Blanc, N. and Gury, F.. 1986. “Eros/Amor, Cupido,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae iii. Zurich and Munich: 952–1048.Google Scholar
Boatwright, M. 1998. “Luxuriant Gardens and Extravagant Women: The Horti of Rome between Republic and Empire,” in Cima and La Rocca 1998: 71–82.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 1997. “Becoming Medea: Assimilation in Euripides,” in Clauss and Johnston 1997: 127–48.Google Scholar
Bon, S. E. and Jones, R. eds. 1997. Sequence and Space in Pompeii. Oxford.Google Scholar
Boschung, D. 1987. Antike Grabaltäre aus den Nekropolen Roms. Bern.Google Scholar
Boucher, J.-P. 1965. Études sur Properce – Problèmes d’inspiration et d’art. Paris.Google Scholar
Bowditch, L. 2009. “Palatine Apollo and the Imperial Gaze: Propertius 2.31 and 2.32,” American Journal of Philology 130: 401–38.Google Scholar
Bowie, T. 1970. “Preface,” in Bowie and Christenson 1970: ix–x.Google Scholar
Bowie, T. and Christenson, C. V. eds. 1970. Studies in Erotic Art. New York.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. ed. 2002. Brill’s Companion to Ovid. Leiden.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. 2014. Seneca: Medea. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bragantini, I. 1995. “Problemi di pittura romana,” Annali di archeologia e storia antica 2: 175–97.Google Scholar
Bragantini, I. 2004. “Una pittura sense maestri: la produzione della pittura parietale romana,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 17: 131–45.Google Scholar
Bragantini, I. ed. 2010. Atti del X Congresso Internazionale dell’AIPMA (Association Internationale pour la Peinture Murale Antique), Napoli 17–21 settembre 2007, Vol. 1. Naples.Google Scholar
Bragantini, I. 2014. “Roman Painting in the Republic and Early Empire,” in Pollitt 2014: 302–69.Google Scholar
Bragantini, I. and de Vos, M.. 1982. Museo Nazionale Romano. Le Pitture ii, 1. Le decorazioni della villa romana della Farnesina. Rome.Google Scholar
Braund, S. and Mayer, R. eds. 1999. Amor: Roma. Love and Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Breed, B. 2003. “Portrait of a Lady: Propertius 1.3 and Ecphrasis,” The Classical Journal 99: 35–56.Google Scholar
Breed, B. 2006. Pastoral Inscriptions: Reading and Writing Virgil’s Eclogues. London.Google Scholar
Brendel, O. J. 1970. “The Scope and Treatment of Erotic Art in the Greco-Roman World,” in Bowie and Christenson 1970: 3–69.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. 1984. Visual Narratives: Storytelling in Etruscan and Roman Art. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. 2007. “Forwards and Backwards in the Historiography of Roman Art,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 20: 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. 1963. Horace on Poetry: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1987. Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura iv, 1030–1287 with Prolegomena, Text and Translation. Leiden.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1968. “The First Edition of Ovid’s Amores,” The Classical Quarterly 18: 320–33.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1980. “Poetae Novelli,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 84: 127–75.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1993. The Greek Anthology: From Meleager to Planudes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cantarella, E. 2002. “Marriage and Sexuality in Republican Rome: A Conjugal Love Story,” in Nussbaum and Sihvola 2002: 269–82.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, F. and Volpi, C.. 1993. “New Documents Concerning the Discovery and Early History of the Nozze Aldobrandini,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institute 61: 274–79.Google Scholar
Carucci, M. 2010. “The Representation of Medea in the Roman House,” in Bartel and Simon 2010: 53–65.Google Scholar
Casson, L. 2001. Libraries in the Ancient World. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G., Fedeli, P., and Giardina, A. eds. 1989. Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, v. 1: la produzione del testo. Rome.Google Scholar
Cima, M. and La Rocca, E. eds. 1998. Horti Romani – Atti del Convegno Internazionale, Roma, 4–6 maggio 1995. Rome.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. 1991. The Houses of Roman Italy 100 bc–ad 250: Ritual, Space and Decoration. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. 1998. Looking at Lovemaking: Constructions of Sexuality in Roman Art 100 bc–ad 250. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. 2003. Art in the Lives of Ordinary Romans: Visual Representation and Non-Elite Viewers in Italy, 100 bc–ad 315. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. 2005. “Augustan Domestic Interiors: Propaganda or Fashion?” in Galinsky 2005: 264–80.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. 2010. “Model-Book, Outline-Book, Figure-Book: New Observations on the Creation of Near-Exact Copies in Romano-Campanian Painting,” in Bragantini 2010: 203–14.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. 1987. Virgil’s Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. 1994. A Commentary on Virgil, Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clauss, J. and Johnston, S. I. eds. 1997 Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy, and Art. Princeton.Google Scholar
Coates, V. and Seydl, J. eds. Antiquity Recovered: The Legacy of Pompeii and Herculaneum. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. 1991. “The Augustan Law on Adultery: The Social and Cultural Context,” in Kertzer and Saller 1991: 109–26.Google Scholar
Colantuono, A. 1989. “Titian’s Tender Infants: On the Imitation of Venetian Painting in Baroque Rome,” I Tatti Studies 3: 207–34.Google Scholar
Collard, C., Cropp, M. J., and Gibert, J.. 2004. Euripides: Selected Fragmentary Plays with Introductions, Translations and Commentaries. Volume ii. Oxford.Google Scholar
Colpo, I. 2006. “‘Quod non alter et alter eras’. Dinamiche figurative nel repertorio di Narciso in area vesuviano,” Antenor 5: 51–85.Google Scholar
Colpo, I. 2008. “‘Ambienti ovidiani’ nelle case vesuviane? Riflessioni preliminari,” Eidola: International Journal of Classical Art History 5: 65–82.Google Scholar
Colpo, I. and Salvadori, M.. 2010. “Ovidio e la pittura della prima età imperial,” in Bragantini 2020: 277–88.Google Scholar
Colpo, I., Minotti, F., and Grassigli, G. L.. 2007. “Le ragioni di una scelta: discutendo attorno alle immagini di Narciso a Pompei,” Eidola: International Journal of Classical Art History 4: 1000–46.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2000. “Asymptotes of Pleasure: Thoughts on the Nature of Roman Erotic Elegy,” Arethusa 33: 71–98.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets (trans. Segal, C.). Ithaca.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1989. “Love without Elegy: The Remedia Amoris and the Logic of a Genre” (trans. Most, G.), Poetics Today 10: 441–69.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1994. Latin Literature: A History (trans. Solodow, J. B.). Baltimore.Google Scholar
Copley, F. O. 1947. “Servitium Amoris,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 78: 285–300.Google Scholar
Copley, F. O. 1956. Exclusus Amator: A Study in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Coralini, A. 2001. Hercules Domesticus. Immagini di Ercole nelle case della regione vesuviana (I secolo a.C.–79 d.C.). Naples.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. 2013. Virgo to Virago: Medea in the Silver Age. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. 1995. Musa Lapidaria: A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. 2010. “A Stranger in a Strange Land: Medea in Roman Republican Tragedy,” in Bartel and Simon 2010: 39–52.Google Scholar
Crowley, P. 2019. The Phantom Image: Seeing the Dead in Ancient Rome. Chicago.Google Scholar
Currie, H. 1981. “Ovid and the Roman Stage,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römische Welt ii 31: 2701–42.Google Scholar
Curtius, L. 1929. Die Wandmalerei Pompejis. Leipzig.Google Scholar
D’Alconzo, P. 2002. Picturae excisae. Conservazione e restauro dei dipinti ercolanesi e pompeiani tra xviii e xix secolo. Rome.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J. 1979. “Ville rustiche e ville di otium,” in Zevi 1979: 65–86.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J. 1998. “Between Public and Private: the Epulum Publicum and Caesar’s Horti Trans Tiberim,” in Cima and La Rocca 1998: 33–43.Google Scholar
Davies, P. 2017. Architecture and Politics in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dawson, C. 1965. Romano-Campanian Mythological Landscape Painting. Rome.Google Scholar
De Angelis, F. ed. 1999. Im Spiegel des Mythos. Bilderwelt und Lebenswelt/Lo specchio del mito. Immaginario e realtà. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
De Rougemont, , Denis, . 1956. Love in the Western World (trans. Belgion, M.). New York.Google Scholar
Della Corte, F. 1982. “Le ‘leges Iuliae’ e l’elegi romana,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römische Welt ii 30: 539–58.Google Scholar
Della Corte, M. 1922. “Scavi eseguiti da private nel territorio di Pompei,” Notizie degli scavi di antichità 19: 459–85.Google Scholar
Della Corte, M. 1926. “Publius Paquius Proculus,” Journal of Roman Studies 16: 145–54.Google Scholar
Della Corte, M. 1954. Case ed abitanti di Pompei. Pompei-Scavi.Google Scholar
Dexter, C. 1975. The Casa di L. Cecilio Giocondo in Pompeii. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Duke University.Google Scholar
Dillon, S. and Welch, K. eds. 2006. Representations of War in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. 2017. Stories of Daily Life from the Roman World: Extracts from the Ancient Colloquia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dobbins, J. J. and Foss, P. W. eds. 2007. The World of Pompeii. New York.Google Scholar
Docter, R. and Moormann, E. eds. 1999. Proceedings of the xvth International Congress of Classical Archaeology, Amsterdam, July 12–17, 1998. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dorey, T. A., 1958. “Cicero, Clodia and the ‘Pro Caelio,’” Greece and Rome 5: 175–80.Google Scholar
Dorey, T. A., ed. 1966. Latin Historians: Studies in Latin Literature and Its Influence. London.Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. M. Le M. 1979. “From Polyphemus to Corydon: Virgil, Eclogue 2 and the Idylls of Theocritus,” in West and Woodman 1979: 35–69.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, K. 2003. The Roman Banquet: Images of Conviviality. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. D. and Bailey, E. eds. 2012. Gravity in Art: Essays on Weight and Weightlessness in Painting, Sculpture, and Photography. Jefferson and London.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1995. Art and The Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. ed. 1996. Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2007. Roman Eyes: Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text. Princeton.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Meyer, M. eds. 2014. Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Esposito, D. 1999. “La ‘Bottega dei Vettii’: vecchi dati e nuove acquisizioni,” Rivista di studi pompeiaini 10: 23–61.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 2006. Julia Augusti: The Emperor’s Daughter. London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. 2003. “Pastoral Love and ‘Elegiac’ Love, from Greece to Rome,” Leeds International Classical Studies 2: 1–11.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, Th. eds. 2006. Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral. Leiden.Google Scholar
Faraone, C. 2006. “Magic, Medicine and Eros in the Prologue to Theocritus’ Id. 11,” in Fantuzzi and Papanghelis 2006: 75–90.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 1992. “Dialogue of Genres in Ovid’s ‘Lovesong of Polyphemus’ (Metamorphoses 13.719–897),” American Journal of Philology 113: 235–68.Google Scholar
Fear, T. 2000. “The Poet as Pimp: Elegiac Seduction in the Time of Augustus,” Arethusa 33: 217–40.Google Scholar
Fear, T. 2005. “Propertian Closure: The Elegiac Inscription of the Liminal Male and Ideological Contestation in Augustan Rome,” in Ancona and Greene 2005: 13–40.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. 1989. “La poesia d’amore,” in Cavallo, Fedeli, and Giardina 1989: 143–76.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. 2005. Properzio, Elegie Libro ii Introduzione, testo e commento. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 1992. “Shall I Compare Thee …? Catullus 68b and the Limits of Analogy,” in Woodman and Powell 1992: 33–44.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2007. Casesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. 1961. “Catullus and Tennyson,” English Studies in Africa 12: 41–58.Google Scholar
Fiorelli, G. 1879. “Roma. Regione xiv,” Notizie degli scavi di antichità 1879: 68–69, 114–15, 141, 179–81, 267–69, 314–15, 333.Google Scholar
Fiorelli, G. 1885. “Roma. Regione xiv,” Notizie degli scavi di antichità 1885: 224, 251.Google Scholar
Flory, M. 1984. “Sic exempla parantur: Livia’s Shrine to Concordia and the Porticus Liviae,” Historia 33: 309–30.Google Scholar
Foley, H. 1984. “‘Reverse Similes’ and Sex Roles in the Odyssey,” in Peradotto and Sullivan 1984: 59–78.Google Scholar
Foley, H. 1989. “Medea’s Divided Self,” Classical Antiquity 8: 61–85.Google Scholar
Foley, H. 2001. Female Acts in Greek Tragedy. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Volume 1 (trans. Hurley, R.). New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1986. The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality. Volume 3 (trans. Hurley, R.). New York.Google Scholar
Frazer, A. 1992. “The Roman Villa and the Pastoral Ideal,” in Hunt 1992: 49–61.Google Scholar
Fredrick, D. 1997. “Reading Broken Skin: Violence in Roman Elegy,” in Hallett and Skinner 1997: 172–96.Google Scholar
Fried, M. 1980. Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.Google Scholar
Frommel, C. L. ed. 2003. La Villa Farnesina a Roma/The Villa Farnesina in Rome. Modena.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. 2005. The Ovidian Heroine as Author: Reading, Writing, and Community in the Heroides. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. 2012. “Pastoral Appropriation and Assimilation in Ovid’s Apollo and Daphne Episode,” Trends in Classics 4: 29–47.Google Scholar
Fusconi, G. 1994. La Fortuna delle ‘Nozze Aldobrandini’. Dall’Esquilino alla Biblioteca Vaticana. Vatican City.Google Scholar
Gabaccia, D. R. and Maynes, M. J. eds. 2013. Gender History across Epistemologies. Chichester.Google Scholar
Gahtan, M. and Pegazzano, D. eds. 2014. Museum Archetypes and Collecting in the Ancient World. Leiden.Google Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. 2007. “Catullus in the Renaissance,” in Skinner 2007: 439–60.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1981. “Augustus’ Legislation on Morals and Marriage,” Philologus 125: 126–44.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 2005. ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. 2010. “The Elegiac Domus in the Early Augustan Principate,” American Journal of Philology 131: 453–93.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. 1986. Women in Roman Law and Society. Bloomington.Google Scholar
Gazda, E. ed. 1991. Roman Art in the Private Sphere: New Perspectives on the Architecture and Décor of the Domus, Villa and Insula. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Geffcken, K. 1973. Comedy in the Pro Caelio. Leiden.Google Scholar
Ghedini, F. and Colpo, I.. 2007. “Schema e schema iconografico: il caso di Ciparisso nel repertorio pompeiano,” Eidola: International Journal of Classical Art History 4: 49–71.Google Scholar
Ghiotto, A. 2000. “Il mito di Polifemo e Galatea nella prima età imperiale,” Antenor 2: 29–51.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. 2003. Ovid: Ars Amatoria Book 3. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. and Whitton, C. eds. 2016. The Epistles of Pliny. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. 1979. Civiltà delle forme letterarie nell’antica Pompei. Naples.Google Scholar
Gigli, L. 1952. “Appunti sulla casa romana della Farnesina,” L’Urbe 15: 3–11.Google Scholar
Gil, D. J. 2002. “Before Intimacy: Modernity and Emotion in the Early Modern Discourse on Sexuality,” English Literary History 69: 861–87.Google Scholar
Gold, B. ed. 1982. Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome. Austin.Google Scholar
Gold, B. ed. 2012. A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, Oxford, Carlton.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1994. “The Naïve and Knowing Eye: Ecphrasis and the Culture of Viewing in the Hellenistic World,” in Goldhill and Osborne 1994: 197–223.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1997. “What is Ekphrasis For?” Classical Philology 102: 1–19.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. eds. 1994. Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J. ed. 2015. Diachrony: Diachronic Studies of Ancient Greek Literature and Culture. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L. eds. 1968. The Greek Anthology: The Garland of Philip and Some Contemporary Epigrams. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Graf, F. ed. 1993. Mythos in mythenloser Gesellschaft: das Paradigma Roms. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Greene, E. 1998. The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Greene, E. 2005. “Gender Identity and the Elegiac Hero in Propertius 2.1,” in Ancona and Greene 2005: 61–78.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1985. Latin Poets and Roman Life. London.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. 1963. L’amour à Rome. Paris.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. 1986. The Dictionary of Classical Mythology (trans. Maxwell-Hyslop, A. R.). Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Grüner, A. 2004. Venus Ordinis: Der Wandel von Malerei und Literatur im Zeitaler der römischen Bürgerkriege. Paderborn.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. 1997. “Catullus, Pliny, and Love-Letters,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 127: 201–31.Google Scholar
Gurd, S. 2007. “Meaning and Material Presence: Four Epigrams on Timomachus’ Unfinished ‘Medea,’” Transactions of the American Philological Association 137: 305–31.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 1985. “The Lover and the Lena: Propertius 4.5,” Ramus 14: 105–15.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 2002. “Art’s Echo: The Tradition of Hellenistic Ecphrastic Epigram,” in Harder, Regtuit, and Wakker 2002: 85–112.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 2004. “Seeing Thought: Timomachus’ Medea and Ecphrastic Epigram,” American Journal of Philology 125: 339–86.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 2010. “Images poétiques et reminiscences artistiques dans les épigrammes de Meleagre,” in Prioux and Rouveret 2010: 67–112.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1997. “The Invention of Sexuality in the World-City of Rome,” in Habinek and Schiesaro 1997: 23–43.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. eds. 1997. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. 1973. “The Role of Women in Roman Elegy: Counter-Cultural Feminism,” Arethusa 6: 103–24.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. 1978. “Morigerari: Suetonius, Tiberius, 44,” L’Antiquité Classique 47: 196–200.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B. eds. 1997. Roman Sexualities. Princeton.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., and Wakker, G. C. eds. 2002. Hellenistic Epigrams. Leuven.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. ed. 2002. The Cambridge Companion to Ovid. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. ed. 2009. Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. 2002. “Ovid and Genre: Evolutions of an Elegist,” in Hardie 2002: 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. 2007. Generic Enrichment in Virgil and Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hart, M. L. and Walton, J. M.. 2010. The Art of Ancient Greek Theater. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Heinze, T. 1993. “The Authenticity of Ovid Heroides 12 Reconsidered,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 38: 94–97.Google Scholar
Heinze, T. 1997. P. Ovidius Naso. Der XII. Heroidenbrief: Medea an Jason. Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar
Hekster, O. and Mols, S. eds. 2010. Cultural Messages in the Graeco-Roman World: Acta of the BABESCH 80th Anniversary Workshop Radboud University Nijmegen, September 8th 2006 (BABESCH Supplementa 15). Leuven.Google Scholar
Hejduk, J. 2008. Clodia: A Sourcebook. Norman.Google Scholar
Helbig, W. 1866. “Musaici di Centocelle,” Bullettino dell’Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica 1866: 170–73.Google Scholar
Helbig, W. 1868. Wandgemälde der vom Vesuv verschütteten städte Campaniens. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Helbig, W. 1969. Führer durch den offentlichen Sammlungen Roms 3 (ed. Speier, H.). Tübingen.Google Scholar
Helmerijk, E. 1999. Matrona Docta: Educated Women in the Roman Elite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London.Google Scholar
Hermany, A., Cassimatis, H., and Vollkommer, R.. 1986. “Eros,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae iii. Zurich and Munich: 850–942.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. 2007. Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1993. “Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the Life of an Intertextual Heroine,” Materiali e discussion per l’analisi dei testi classici 30: 9–47.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. 1977. Ovid: Ars Amatoria Book i. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 2004. The Language of Images in Roman Art (trans. Snodgrass, A. and Künzl-Snodgrass, A.). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Houston, G. 2013. “The Non-Philodemus Book Collection in the Villa of the Papyri,” in König, Oikonomopoulou, and Woolf 2013: 183–208.Google Scholar
Houston, G. 2014. Inside Roman Libraries: Book Collections and Their Management in Antiquity. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. 1984a. “Art and Vision in Propertius 2.31/2.32,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 114: 281–97.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. 1984b. “Catullus 68: The Text as Demystification,” Arethusa 17: 29–49.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. 2015. “Diachronic Parameters of Athenian Pederasty,” in Gonzalez 2015: 363–89.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. D. ed. 1992. The Pastoral Landscape. Hanover and London.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1989. Apollonius of Rhodes: Argonautica Book iii. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1999. Theocritus: A Selection: Idylls 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, and 13. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2006. The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. 2013. “Genre and Super-Genre,” in Papanghelis, Harrison, and Frangoulidis 2013: 19–34.Google Scholar
Icard-Gianolio, N. and Szabadios, A.-V.. 1992. “Nereides,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae v. Zurich and Munich: 785–824.Google Scholar
Ippel, A. 1910. Die dritte pompejanische Stil. Bonn.Google Scholar
Jacobelli, L. 1995. Le pitture erotiche delle terme suburbane di Pompei. Rome.Google Scholar
Jacobson, H. 1974. Ovid’s Heroides. Princeton.Google Scholar
James, S. 2001. “The Economics of Roman Elegy: Voluntary Poverty, the Recusatio and the Greedy Girl,” American Journal of Philology 122: 223–53.Google Scholar
James, S. 2003. Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Janan, M. 1994. When the Lamp Is Shattered: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale and Edwardsville.Google Scholar
Janan, M. 2001. The Politics of Desire: Propertius iv. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Jansen, L. ed. 2014. The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Readers. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Jenkyns, R. 1998. Virgil’s Experience: Nature and History: Times, Names and Places. Oxford.Google Scholar
Johns, C. 1982. Sex or Symbol: Erotic Images of Greece and Rome. Austin.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. and Parker, H. eds. 2009. Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jones, N. 2014a. “Temple Inventory and Fictive Picture Gallery: Painting Between Votive Offering and Artwork,” in Gahtan and Pegazzano 2014: 118–28.Google Scholar
Jones, N. 2014b. “Ancient Painted Panels: Terminology and Appearance,” Mnemosyne 67: 295–304.Google Scholar
Jones, N. 2018. “Starting from Places: Continuous Narration and Discontinuous Perspectives in Roman Art,” The Art Bulletin 100: 7–35.Google Scholar
Jones, N. 2019. Painting, Ethics and Aesthetics in Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Joshel, S. and Petersen, L.. 2014. The Material Life of Roman Slaves. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karivieri, A. 2014. “Mythic, Public and Private Memory: Creation of a Pompeian Identity in the House of Caecilius Iucundus,” in Alroth and Scheffer 2014: 87–112.Google Scholar
Kampen, N. ed. 1996. Sexuality in Ancient Art. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kauffman, L. S. 1986. Discourses of Desire: Gender, Genre, and Epistolary Fictions. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 1987. “Arcades ambo: Virgil, Gallus and Arcadia,” Hermathena 143: 47–59.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 2002. “Epistolarity: the Heroides,” in Hardie 2002: 217–32.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. 1983. “Virgil and the Elegiac Sensibility,” Illinois Classical Studies 8: 44–59.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. 1996. Heroides, xvi–xxi. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. and Clausen, W. eds. 1982. The Cambridge History of Classical Literature ii.3. The Age of Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kertzer, D. I. and Saller, R. P. eds. The Family in Italy: From Antiquity to the Present. New Haven.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, R. 2002. “The Early Augustan ‘Aldobrandini Wedding’ Fresco: A Quatercentenary Reappraisal (1601–2001),” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 47: 19–32.Google Scholar
Kleiner, D. 1992. Roman Sculpture. New Haven.Google Scholar
Kleiner, D. and Matheson, S. eds. 1996. I, Claudia: Women in Ancient Rome. New Haven.Google Scholar
Knox, P. 1986. “Ovid’s Medea and the Authenticity of Heroides 12,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, P. 1995. Heroides: Select Epistles. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Knox, P. 2002. “The Heroides: Elegiac Voices,” in Boyd 2002: 117–40.Google Scholar
Kokkorou-Alewras, G. 1990. “Herakles and the Hesperides (Labour xii),” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae v. Zurich and Munich: 110–11.Google Scholar
König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K., and Woolf, G. eds. 2013. Ancient Libraries. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koortbojian, M. 1995. Myth, Meaning, and Memory on Roman Sarcophagi. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Koortbojian, M. 2005. “Mimesis or Phantasia? Two Representational Modes in Roman Commemorative Art,” Classical Antiquity 24: 285–306.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E., 2008. Lo spazio negato. La pittura di paesaggio nella cultura artistica greca e romana. Milan.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E., de Vos, M., and de Vos, A. 1994. Pompei. Milan.Google Scholar
Lanciani, R. 1880. “Roma. Regio xiv,” Notizie degli scavi di antichità: 127–42.Google Scholar
Larmour, H. J., Miller, P. A., and Platter, C. eds. 1998. Rethinking Sexuality: Foucault and Classical Antiquity. Princeton.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 1974. “Ekphrasis and the Theme of Artistic Failure in Ovid’s Metamorphoses,” Ramus 3: 102–42.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 1980. “Sacral-Idyllic Landscape Painting and the Poems of Tibullus’ First Book,” Latomus 39: 47–69.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 1982. “Patrons, Painters and Patterns: The Anonymity of Romano-Campanian Painting and the Transition from the Second to the Third Style,” in Gold 1982: 135–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. 1984. “Transformations in the Georgics: Vergil’s Italy and Varro’s,” Atti del Convegnoscientifico mondiale di studi su Virgilio, Accademia Nazionale Virgiliana 1984: 96–98.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 1988. The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republican and Augustan Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 1992. “Polyphemus in a Landscape: Traditions of Pastoral Courtship,” in Hunt 1992: 63–88.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 1997. “Oecus on Ibycus: Investigating the Vocabulary of the Roman House,” in Bon and Jones 1997: 50–72.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 2004. The Social Life of Painting in Ancient Rome and on the Bay of Naples. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leen, A. 2000–2001. “Clodia Oppugnatrix: The Domus Motif in Cicero’s Pro Caelio,” The Classical Journal 96: 141–62.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 2004. “The Pro Caelio and Comedy,” Classical Philology 99: 300–35.Google Scholar
Lessing, G. E. 1984. Laocoön: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry (trans. McCormick, E. A.). Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Ling, R. 1991. Roman Painting. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Ling, R. 1995. “The Decoration of Roman Triclinia,” in Murray and Tecusan 1995: 239–51.Google Scholar
Ling, R. 2005. Review of Allison and Sear, The Casa della Caccia Antica at Pompeii, Journal of Roman Archaeology 18: 593–99.Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, L. 2003. Aphrodite’s Tortoise: The Veiled Woman of Ancient Greece. Swansea.Google Scholar
Longfellow, B. and Perry, E. eds. 2018. Roman Artists, Patrons and Public Consumption: Familiar Works Reconsidered. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Longo, A. R. 2004–2005. “Eros in Meleagro: osservazioni sulla genesi e il significato di alcune immagini e metafore,” Rudiae 16: 335–52.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. 2008. Bilder machen Räume: Mythenbilder in pompejanischen Häusern. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Luck, G. 1959. The Latin Love Elegy. London.Google Scholar
Luck, G. 1982. “Love Elegy,” in Kenney and Clausen 1982: 109–23.Google Scholar
Lugli, G. 1938a. “Pianta dell’antica casa della Farnesina,” Mélanges de l’école française de Rome 55: 5–27.Google Scholar
Lugli, G. 1938b. I monumenti antichi di Roma e suburbio iii. Rome.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1998. Love as Passion: The Codification of Intimacy (trans. Gaines, J. and Jones, D. L.). Stanford.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1978. “The Neoteric Poets,” The Classical Quarterly 28: 167–87.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1979. “Servitium Amoris,” The Classical Quarterly 29: 117–30.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1980. The Latin Love Poets: From Catullus to Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1998. “Love and Death: Laodamia and Protesilaus in Catullus, Propertius and Others,” The Classical Quarterly 48: 200–12.Google Scholar
Maiuri, A. 1938. Le pitture delle case di M. Fabius Amandio, del Sacerdos Amandus e di Cornelius Teges. Rome.Google Scholar
Maiuri, A. 1953. Roman Painting (trans. Gilbert, S.). Geneva.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. 2013. “Medea: Transformations of a Greek Figure in Latin Literature,” Greece and Rome 60: 114–35.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. ed. 1997. The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mau, A. 1876. “Scavi di Pompei,”Bullettino dell’Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica 1876: 149–51, 161–68, 223–34, 241–49.Google Scholar
Mau, A. 1877. “Ettore riportato a Troia. Pittura parietaria di Pompei,” Annali dell’Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica 49: 268–79.Google Scholar
Mau, A. 1880. “Scavi di Pompei,” Bullettino dell’Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica 1880: 73–87, 184–86.Google Scholar
Mau, A. 1882. Geschichte der decorativen Wandmalerei in Pompeji. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mau, A. 1884. “Pitture della casa antica scoperta nella Villa della Farnesina,” Annali dell’Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica 56: 307–32.Google Scholar
Mau, A. 1899. Pompeii: Its Life and Art (trans. Kelsey, F. W.). New York and London.Google Scholar
Mayer, E. 2012. The Ancient Middle Classes: Urban Life and Aesthetics in the Roman Empire, 100 bce–250 ce. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, D. 2004. Domus: Wall Painting in the Roman House. Oxford.Google Scholar
McKeown, J.C. 1987–1998. Ovid: Amores. Text, Prolegomena and Commentary in Four Volumes. Liverpool and New Hampshire.Google Scholar
Mellor, R. 1999. The Roman Historians. New York.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. 2009. “Writing Paraphernalia, Tablets and Muses in Campanian Wall Painting,” American Journal of Archaeology 113: 569–97.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2002. Latin Erotic Elegy: An Anthology and Reader. London and New York.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2004. Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Elegy and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2007. “Catullus and Roman Elegy,” in Skinner 2007: 399–417.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. 2005. Gender, Domesticity and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. Oxford.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. 2009. “Literary Literacy in Roman Pompeii: The Case of Vergil’s Aeneid,” in Johnson and Parker 2009: 288–319.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. 2014. Graffiti and the Literary Landscape in Roman Pompeii. Oxford.Google Scholar
Moccheggiani Carpano, C. 1981. “Indagini archeologiche nel Tevere,” Archeologia Laziale 4: 142–53.Google Scholar
Mollard-Besques, S. 1963. Catalogue raisonné des figurines et reliefs en terre-cuite grecs et romains ii. Paris.Google Scholar
Mols, S. and Moormann, E.. 2008. La Villa della Farnesina: le pitture. Milan.Google Scholar
Moneti, A. 1991. “Le ville di Tiberio a Capri e la villa sotto la Farnesina. Una necessaria riconsiderazione,” Rivista di Archeologia 15: 89–96.Google Scholar
Montón Subias, S. 1990. “Galateia,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae v. Zurich and Munich: 1000–05.Google Scholar
Moormann, E. ed. 1995. Mani di pittori e botteghe pittoriche nel mondo romano (Atti tavola rotonda in onore di W. J. Th. Peters in occasione del suo 75.mo compleanno). Mededelingen van het Nederlands Institut te Rome 54. Rome.Google Scholar
Morales, H. 1996. “The Torturer’s Apprentice: Parrhasius and the Limits of Art,” in Elsner 1996: 182–209.Google Scholar
Morelli, A. ed. 2012. Lepos e mores: una giornata su Catullo. Atti del convegno internazionale, Cassino 27 maggio 2010. Cassino.Google Scholar
Moret, J.-M. 1975. L’Ilioupersis dans la céramique italiote. Les mythes et leur expression figurée au ive siècle. Rome.Google Scholar
Morgner, C. 2014. “The Theory of Love and the Theory of Society: Remarks on the Oeuvre of Niklas Luhmann,” International Sociology 29: 396–404.Google Scholar
Müller, F. 1994. The Aldobrandini Wedding. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Müller, H. 1994. “Luhmann’s Systems Theory as a Theory of Modernity,” New German Critique 61: 39–54.Google Scholar
Murgatroyd, P. 1981. “Servitium Amoris and the Roman Elegists,” Latomus 40: 589–606.Google Scholar
Murray, O. and Tecusan, M. eds. 1995. In Vino Veritas. London.Google Scholar
Myerowitz, M. 1992. “The Domestication of Desire: Ovid’s Parva Tabella and the Theater of Love,” in Richlin 1992: 131–57.Google Scholar
Nava, M. L., Paris, R., and Friggeri, R. eds. 2007. Rosso Pompeiano. La decorazione pittorica nelle collezioni del Museo di Napoli e a Pompei. Milan.Google Scholar
Neer, R. 2010. The Emergence of the Classical Style in Greek Sculpture. Chicago.Google Scholar
Neutsch, B. 1940. Der Maler Nikias von Athen: Ein Beitrag zur griechischen Künstlergeschichte und zur pompejanischen Wandmalerei. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Nevett, L. 1997. “Perceptions of Domestic Space in Roman Italy,” in Rawson and Weaver 1997: 281–98.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. 2016. Greek Myths in Roman Art and Culture: Imagery, Values and Identity in Italy, 50 bc–ad 250. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. 1997. “The Metamorphosis of Ovid’s Medea,” in Clauss and Johnston 1997: 178–208.Google Scholar
Nicosia, S. 1968. Teocrito e l’arte figurata. Palermo.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. 2016. “Vitruvius on Vermillion: Faberius’ Domestic Décor and the Invective Tradition,” Arethusa 49: 317–33.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. 2017. Author and Audience in Vitruvius’ De Architectura. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nissinen, L. 2012. “A Bedroom of One’s Own,” in Anguissola 2012: 15–30.Google Scholar
Nogara, B. 1907. Le Nozze Aldobrandini, i paesaggi con scene dell’Odissea e le altre pitture murali antiche conservate nella Biblioteca Vaticana e nei Musei Pontefici. Milan.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. and Sihvola, J. eds. 2002. The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome. Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Nyenhuis, J. 1986. “Daidalos et Ikaros,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae iii. Zurich and Munich: 313–21.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1997. “Sons and Lovers: Sexuality and Gender in Virgil’s Poetry,” in Martindale 1997: 294–311.Google Scholar
Olson, K. 2008. Dress and the Roman Woman: Self-Presentation and Society. New York.Google Scholar
Pagano, V. 2010. L’Andromeda di Euripide. Edizione e commento dei frammenti. Alessandria.Google Scholar
Page, D. 1955. The Homeric Odyssey. Oxford.Google Scholar
Papanghelis, Th. 1999. “Eros Pastoral and Profane: On Love in Virgil’s Eclogues,” in Braund and Mayer 1999: 44–59.Google Scholar
Papanghelis, Th., Harrison, S. J., and Frangoulidis, S. eds. 2013. Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions and Transformations. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Parker, H. 1992. “Love’s Body Anatomized: The Ancient Erotic Handbooks and the Rhetoric of Sexuality,” in Richlin 1992: 90–107.Google Scholar
Parslow, C. C. 1995. Rediscovering Antiquity: Karl Weber and the Excavation of Herculaneum, Pompeii and Stabiae. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Paz, O. 1993. La llama doble: amor y erotismo. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Perali, P. 1938. Osservatore Romano, February 27, 1938, 3.Google Scholar
Peradotto, J. and Sullivan, J. P. eds. 1984. Women in the Ancient World: The Arethusa Papers. Albany.Google Scholar
Perrot, G. 1870. “Les peintures du Palatin ii Io, Argus, Hermès et Héra,” Révue Archéologique 21: 387–95.Google Scholar
Perrot, G. 1870–1871a. “Les peintures du Palatin iii Polyphème et Galatée,” Révue Archéologique 22: 47–53.Google Scholar
Perrot, G. 1870–1871b. “Les peintures du Palatin iv Vue d’une rue de Rome (Suite),” Révue Archéologique 22: 152–58.Google Scholar
Perrot, G. 1870–1871c. “Les peintures du Palatin v Deux scènes de magie (Suite et fin),” Révue Archéologique 22: 193–202.Google Scholar
Peters, W. 1963. Landscape in Romano-Campanian Mural Painting. Assen.Google Scholar
Peters, W. 1993. La Casa di Marcus Lucretius Fronto a Pompei e le sue pitture. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Petersen, L. 2006. The Freedman in Roman Art and Art History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Phillips, K. 1968. “Perseus and Andromeda,” American Journal of Archaeology 72: 1–23.Google Scholar
Pinkwart, D. 1965. Das Relief des Archelaos von Priene und die “Musen des Philiskos.” Kallmünz.Google Scholar
Platt, V. 2009. “Where the Wild Things Are: Locating the Marvelous in Roman Wall-Painting,” in Hardie 2009: 41–74.Google Scholar
Platt, V. 2014. “Agamemnon’s Grief: On the Limits of Expression in Roman Rhetoric and Painting,” in Elsner and Meyer 2014: 211–32.Google Scholar
Platt, V. 2018. “Orphaned Objects: The Phenomenology of the Incomplete in Pliny’s Natural History,” Art History 41: 492–517.Google Scholar
Platt, V. and Squire, M. eds. 2017. The Frame in Classical Art: A Cultural History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. 1978. “The Impact of Greek Art in Rome,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 108: 155–74.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. 1986. Art in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. ed. 2014. The Cambridge History of Painting in the Classical World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Presicce, C. P. 1996. “Penelope e il riconoscimento di Ulisse,” in Andreae and Presicce 1996: 378–95.Google Scholar
Presuhn, E. 1882. Pompeji. Die Neuesten Ausgrabungen von 1874–1881. Für Kunst- und Alterthumsfreunde illustrirt herausgegeben von Emil Presuhn. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Prioux, E. 2010. “Um Libellus Epigrammaton na chamada Casa de Propércio,” Organon 40: 169–201.Google Scholar
Prioux, E. and Rouveret, A. eds. 2010. Métamorphoses du regard ancien. Paris.Google Scholar
Provenzale, V. 2008. Echi di propaganda imperiale in scene di coppia a Pompei: Enea e Didone, Marte e Venere, Perseo e Andromeda. Rome.Google Scholar
Pulcini, E. 1998. Amour-passion et amour conjugal. Rousseau et l’origine d’un conflit moderne. Paris.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. 1998. Virgil’s Epic Designs: Ekphrasis in the Aeneid. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. 2006. Poetic Interplay: Catullus and Horace. Princeton.Google Scholar
Raditsa, L. F. 1980. “Augustus’ Legislation Concerning Marriage, Procreation, Love Affairs and Adultery.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii 13: 278–339.Google Scholar
Rawson, B. and Weaver, P. R. C. eds. 1987. The Roman Family in Italy: Status, Sentiment and Space. Oxford.Google Scholar
Renier, L. 1870. “Les peintures du Palatin,” Révue Archéologique 21: 326–31.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. Jr. 1955. “Pompeii: La Casa dei Dioscuri and Its Painters,” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 23: 1–165.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. ed. 1992. Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. S. 1990. Hellenistic Sculpture 1: The Styles of ca. 331–200 bc. Madison.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. 1997. “‘Public’ and ‘Private’ in Roman Culture: The Case of the Cubiculum,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 10: 36–56.Google Scholar
Rizzo, G. E. 1918. “Dionysos Mystes. Contributi esegetici alla rappresentatazione dei misteri Orfici,” Memorie delle Reale Accademia di archeologia, lettere e belle arti di Napoli 3: 37–102.Google Scholar
Rizzo, G. E. 1929. La pittura ellenistico-romana. Milan.Google Scholar
Rizzo, G. E. 1936. Monumenti della Pittura Antica Scoperti in Italia. Sezione Terza. La Pittura Ellenistico-Romana. Roma. Fasc. iii. Le Pitture dela “Casa di Livia” (Palatino). Rome.Google Scholar
Robert, C. 1876. “Iphigenia in Tauris,” Archäologische Zeitung 33: 133–48.Google Scholar
Roccos, L. J. 1994. “Perseus,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae vii. Zurich and Munich: 332–48.Google Scholar
Rodenwaldt, G. 1910. “Mosaik in Wiener Hofmuseum,” Römische Mitteilungen 25: 256–62.Google Scholar
Roller, M. 1998. “Pliny’s Catullus: The Politics of Literary Appropriation,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 128: 265–304.Google Scholar
Roller, M. 2003. “Horizontal Women: Posture and Sex in the Roman convivium,” American Journal of Philology 124: 377–422.Google Scholar
Roller, M. 2006. Dining Posture in Ancient Rome: Bodies, Values and Status. Princeton.Google Scholar
Romizzi, L. 2006a. “La Casa dei Dioscuri di Pompei (VI 9,6.7): una nuova lettura,” Contributi di archeologia vesuviana ii: 77–160.Google Scholar
Romizzi, L. 2006b. “Evergetismo pubblico e magnificenza privata nella Pompeii neroniano-flavia: un percorso per immagini,” Ostraka 15: 97–133.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 1985. “Forma elegiaca di un simbolo letterario: la Fedra di Ovidio,” Atti delle Giornate di studio su Fedra; Torino, 7–8–9 maggio 1984: 113–31.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. 1996. “Love Letters in Callimachus, Ovid and Aristaenetus, or, The Sad Fate of a Mail-Order Bride,” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 36: 9–31.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. 2001. Ancient Epistolary Fictions: the Letter in Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rostovtzeff, M. 1926. The Social and Economic History of the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. 1989. Histoire et imaginaire de la peinture ancienne (ve siècle av. J. C.–ier siècle ap. J. C.). Rome.Google Scholar
Ruesch, A. 1908. Guida illustrate del Museo Nazionale di Napoli. Naples.Google Scholar
Russell, A. 2016. The Politics of Public Space in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S. 2012. Ancient Rome as a Museum: Power, Identity, and the Culture of Collecting. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sanzi Di Mino, M. ed. 1998. La Villa della Farnesina in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme. Milan.Google Scholar
Sarkissian, J. 1983. Catullus 68: An Interpretation. Leiden.Google Scholar
Sauron, G. 1979. “Les modèles funéraires classiques de l’art décoratif néo-attique au Ier siècle av. J.-C.,” Mélanges de l’école française de Rome 91: 183–236.Google Scholar
Sauron, G. 2001. “La révolution iconographique du ‘deuxième style,’” Mélanges de l’école française de Rome 113: 769–86.Google Scholar
Sauron, G. 2009. Les décors privés des Romains: dans l’intimité des mâitres du monde. Paris.Google Scholar
Scagliarini-Corlaità, D. ed. 1995. Atti del vi Convegno Internazionale sulla Pittura Parietale Antica. Bologna.Google Scholar
Schauenburg, K. 1981. “Andromeda i,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae i. Zurich and Munich: 775–90.Google Scholar
Schefold, K. 1972. La peinture pompéienne. Essai sur l’évolution de sa signification (trans. Croisille, J.-M.). Brussels.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1992. “Medeia,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae vi. Zurich and Munich: 386–98.Google Scholar
Scioli, E. 2015. Dream, Fantasy, and Visual Art in Roman Elegy. Madison.Google Scholar
Sebesta, J. 1994. “Tunica Ralla, Tunica Spissa: The Colors and Textiles of Roman Costume,” in Sebesta and Bonfante 1994: 65–76.Google Scholar
Sebesta, J. and Bonfante, L. eds. 1994. The World of Roman Costume. Madison.Google Scholar
Settis, S. 1984. “Images of Meditation, Uncertainty and Repentance in Ancient Art,” History and Anthropology 1: 193–237.Google Scholar
Severy, B. 2003. Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the Roman Empire. New York and London.Google Scholar
Severy-Hoven, B. 2013. “Master Narratives and the Wall Painting in the House of the Vettii, Pompeii,” in Gabaccia and Maynes 2013: 20–60.Google Scholar
Shapiro, H. A. 1981. “Courtship Scenes in Attic Vase-Painting,” American Journal of Archaeology 85: 133–43.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. 1991. “Womanufacture,” Journal of Roman Studies 81: 36–49.Google Scholar
Shelton, J.-A. 2016. “Pliny the Younger and the Ideal Wife,” in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 159–84.Google Scholar
Sider, D. 2005. The Library at the Villa of the Papyri in Herculaneum. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Sider, D. 2010. “The Books of the Villa of the Papyri,” in Zarmakoupi 2010: 115–28.Google Scholar
Simon, E. 1954. “Die Typen der Medeadarstellung in der antiken Kunst,” Gymnasium 61: 203–27.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. ed. 2007. A Companion to Catullus. Malden, Oxford, Carlton.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 2011. Clodia Metteli: The Tribune’s Sister. Oxford.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. ed. 1972. Ennius. Geneva.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1997. “Medea at a Shifting Distance: Images and Euripidean Tragedy,” in Clauss and Johnston 1997: 253–98.Google Scholar
Spentzou, E. 2003. Readers and Writers in Ovid’s Heroides: Transgressions of Genre and Gender. Oxford.Google Scholar
Spentzou, E. 2013. The Roman Poetry of Love: Elegy and Politics in a Time of Revolution. London.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2009. Image and Text in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2017. “Framing the Roman ‘Still Life’: Campanian Wall-Painting and the Frames of Mural Make-Believe,” in Platt and Squire 2017: 188–255.Google Scholar
Stähli, A. 1999. Die Verweigerung der Lüste: erotische Gruppen in der antiken Plastik. Berlin.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. 1990. Greek Sculpture: An Exploration. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. 1997. Art, Desire and the Body in Ancient Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. 1993. On Longing. Durham and London.Google Scholar
Stewart, Z. 1959. “The Song of Silenus,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 64: 179–205.Google Scholar
Stoichita, V. 2015. The Self-Aware Image: An Insight into Early Modern Metapainting. London.Google Scholar
Strocka, V. M. 2007. “Domestic Decoration: Painting and the ‘Four Styles,’” in Dobbins and Foss 2007: 302–22.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. ed. 1962. Critical Essays in Roman Literature: Elegy and Lyric. London.Google Scholar
Swan, G. 2017. “Monstrous Allure: Polyphemus in Pompeii,” Art Inquiries 17: 118–37.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. 2015a. Egypt in Italy: Visions of Egypt in Roman Imperial Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. 2015b. “Encountering Ovid’s Phaedra in House V.2.10–11, Pompeii,” American Journal of Archaeology 119: 217–32.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. 2018. “Marriage Divine? Narratives of the Courtship of Mars and Venus in Roman Painting and Poetry,” in Longfellow and Perry 2018: 166–90.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. 2003. Roman Builders: A Study in Architectural Process. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tennyson, A. 1899. Poetical Works of Alfred Lord Tennyson. London.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 1979a. “New Comedy, Callimachus and Roman Poetry,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 83: 179–206.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 1979b. “Theocritus, Calvus and Eclogue 6,” Classical Philology 74: 337–39.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 1981. “Cinna, Calvus and the Ciris,” The Classical Quarterly 31: 371–74.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2000. Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. L. 1961. “The Monumental and Literary Evidence for Programmatic Painting in Antiquity,” Marsyas 9: 36–77.Google Scholar
Touchefeu, O. 1981. “Aias i,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae i. Zurich and Munich: 312–36.Google Scholar
Touchefeu-Meynier, O. 1992. “Kyklops, Kyklopes,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae vi. Zurich and Munich: 154–59.Google Scholar
Touchefeu-Meynier, O. 1997. “Polyphemos i,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae viii. Zurich and Dusseldorf: 1011–19.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1988. “Home and Forum: Cicero between ‘Public’ and ‘Private,’” Transactions of the American Philological Association 128: 1–23.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1991. Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1999. “The Upper-Class House as Symbol and Focus of Emotion in Cicero,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 12: 33–56.Google Scholar
Tutrone, F. 2013. “Libraries and Intellectual Debate in the Late Republic: The Case of the Aristotelian Corpus,” in König, Oikonomopoulou, and Woolf 2013: 152–66.Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. 1993. “Julius Caesar and the Creation of the Forum Julium,” American Journal of Archaeology 97: 49–80.Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. 1994. The Roman Orator and the Sacred Stage: The Roman Templum Rostratum. Brussels.Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. and Quenemoen, C. eds. 2014. A Companion to Roman Architecture. West Sussex and Malden.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. 2005. “The Lover as a Model Viewer: Gendered Dynamics in Propertius 1.3,” in Ancona and Greene 2005: 206–42.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. 2006. Imago Amoris: The Poetics of Desire in Roman Painting. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. 2007. “Four Women from Stabiae: Eighteenth-Century Antiquarian Practice and the History of Ancient Roman Painting,” in Coates and Seydl 2007: 73–93.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. 2011. “Fallax imago: Ovid’s Narcissus and the seduction of mimesis in Roman wall painting,” Word & Image: A Journal of Verbal/Visual Enquiry 27: 378–95.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. 2012. “Elegy, Art and the Viewer,” in Gold 2012: 318–38.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. 2014. “Pictorial Paratexts: Floating Figures in Roman Wall Painting,” in Jansen 2014: 176–205.Google Scholar
Van Buren, A. W. 1938. “Pinacothecae,” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 15: 70–81.Google Scholar
Vance, N. 1997. The Victorians and Ancient Rome. Oxford and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Varone, A. 1994. Erotica Pompeiana: Inscrizioni d’amore sui muri di Pompei. Rome.Google Scholar
Varone, A. 1995a. “L’organizzazione del lavoro in una bottega di decorator: le evidenze dal recente scavo pompeiano lungo Via dell’Abbondanza,” in Moormann 1995: 124–39.Google Scholar
Varone, A. 1995b. “Pompei: il quadro Helbig 1445, ‘Kasperl im Kindertheater’, una nuova replica e il problema delle copie e varianti,” in Scagliarini-Corlaità 1995: 149–51.Google Scholar
Varone, A. 1997. “Pittori romani al lavoro. Materiali, strumenti, tecniche: evidenze archeologiche e dati analitici di un recente scavo pompeiano lungo Via dell’Abbondanza (Reg. ix ins. 12),” in Béarat 1997: 199–206.Google Scholar
Vasari, G. 1986. Le vite de’ piú eccelenti architetti, pittori et scultori italiani, da Cimabue insino a’ tempi nostri. Turin.Google Scholar
Verducci, F. 1985. Ovid’s Toyshop of the Heart: Epistulae Heroidum. Princeton.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. ed. 1987a. “Marriage,” in Veyne 1987b: 33–51.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 1987b. A History of Private Life: From Pagan Rome to Byzantium (trans. Goldhammer, A.). Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 1988. Roman Erotic Elegy: Love, Poetry and the West (trans. Pellauer, D.). Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Von Blanckenhagen, P. 1957. “Narration in Hellenistic and Roman Art,” American Journal of Archaeology 61: 78–83.Google Scholar
Von Blanckenhagen, P. 1968. “Daedalus and Icarus on Pompeian Walls,” Römische Mitteilungen 75: 106–43.Google Scholar
Von Blanckenhagen, P. and Alexander, C.. 1990. The Augustan Villa at Boscotrecase. Mainz.Google Scholar
Von Blanckenhagen, P. and Green, B.. 1975. “The Aldobrandini Wedding Reconsidered,” Römische Mitteilungen 82: 83–98.Google Scholar
Vout, C. 2012. “Un-finished Business: Re-viewing Medea in Roman Painting,” Ramus 41: 119–43.Google Scholar
Vout, C. 2014. “The Funerary Altar of Pedana and the Rhetoric of Unreachability,” in Elsner and Meyer 2014: 288–315.Google Scholar
Ward-Perkins, J. B. and Claridge, A.. 1978. Pompeii ad 79. Boston.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1985. “Propaganda and Dissent? Augustan Moral Legislation and the Love-Poets,” Klio 67: 180–84.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1994. Houses and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1996. “Engendering the Roman House,” in Kleiner and Matheson 1996: 104–15.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1997. “Mutatio morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution,” in Habinek and Schiesaro 1997: 2–22.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2011. Herculaneum: Past and Future. New York and Los Altos.Google Scholar
Waywell, G. 1982. “A Roman Grave Altar Rediscovered,” American Journal of Archaeology 86: 238–42.Google Scholar
Waywell, G. 1986. The Lever and Hope Sculptures: Ancient Sculptures in the Lady Lever Art Gallery, Port Sunlight and a Catalogue of Ancient Sculptures Formerly in the Hope Collection, London and Deepdene. Berlin.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2009. Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham and Burlington.Google Scholar
Welch, K. 2006. “Domi Militiaeque: Roman Domestic Aesthetics and War Booty in the Republic,” in Dillon and Welch 2006: 39–61.Google Scholar
Wesenberg, B. 1988. “Zur Io des Nikias in den pompejanischen Wandbildern,” Kanon: Fetschrift Ernst Berger. Basel: 344–50.Google Scholar
West, D. and Woodman, T. eds. 1979. Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Westall, R. 1996. “The Forum Iulium as Representation of Imperator Caesar,” Römische Mitteilungen 103: 83–118.Google Scholar
White, P. 1978. “Amicitia and the Profession of Poetry in Early Imperial Rome,” Journal of Roman Studies 68: 74–92.Google Scholar
White, P. 1982. “Positions for Poets in Early Imperial Rome,” in Gold 1982: 50–66.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. 1955. Ovid Recalled. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 1958. “Some Aspects of Roman Marriage Ceremonies and Ideals,” Journal of Roman Studies 48: 16–29.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1982. “Poets and Patrons in Late Republican Rome,” in Gold 1982: 28–49.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1985. Catullus and His World: A Reappraisal. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2019. The House of Augustus: A Historical Detective Story. Princeton.Google Scholar
Wirth, T. 1983. “Zum Bildprogramm in der Casa dei Vettii,” Römische Mitteilungen 90: 449–55.Google Scholar
Woodman, T. and Feeney, D. eds. 2002. Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woodman, T. and Powell, J.. 1992. Author and Audience in Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. 1994. “Taking the Woman’s Part: Engendering Roman Love Elegy,” Ramus 23: 110–26.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. 2002. The Roman Mistress: Ancient and Modern Representations. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wyley, S. 2006. “Roman Replications of Greek Art at the Villa della Farnesina,” Art History 29: 213–32.Google Scholar
Yalouris, N. 1986. “Le mythe d’Io: les transformations d’Io dans l’iconographie et la literature grecques,” Bulletin de correspondance hellénique. Supplément 14: 3–23.Google Scholar
Yalouris, N. 1990. “Io i,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae v. Zurich and Munich: 661–76.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. 1987. Realism in Alexandrian Poetry: A Literature and Its Audience. London and Wolfeboro.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus (trans. Shapiro, A.). Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1998. Eine Kusnt für die Sinne: zur Bilderwelt des Dionysos und der Aphrodite. Berlin.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1999. “Mythenbilder in Haus,” in Docter and Moormann 1999: 40–48.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 2002. Un arte per l’impero: Funzione e intenzione delle immagini nel mondo romano. Milan.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. and Ewald, B.. 2004. Mit Mythen leben: die Bilderwelt der römischen Sarkophage. Munich.Google Scholar
Zarmakoupi, M. ed. 2010. The Villa of the Papyri in Herculaneum: Archaeology, Reception, and Digital Reconstruction. Berlin.Google Scholar
Zarmakoupi, M. 2014a. Designing for Luxury on the Bay of Naples: Villas and Landscapes (100 bce–79 ce). Oxford.Google Scholar
Zarmakoupi, M. 2014b. “Private Villas: Italy and the Provinces,” in Ulrich and Quenemoen 2014: 363–80.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 1996. Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature. Chicago.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1982. “The Poetics of Patronage in the Late First Century bc,” in Gold 1982: 87–102.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2002. “Dreaming about Quirinus: Horace’s Satires and the Development of Augustan Poetry,” in Woodman and Feeney 2002: 38–52.Google Scholar
Zevi, F. 1964. La Casa Reg. IX.5, 18–21 a Pompei e le sue pitture. Rome.Google Scholar
Zevi, F. ed. 1979. Pompei 79: raccolta di studi per il decimonono centenario dell’eruzione vesuviana. Naples.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Hérica Valladares, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Book: Painting, Poetry, and the Invention of Tenderness in the Early Roman Empire
  • Online publication: 26 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108883917.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Hérica Valladares, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Book: Painting, Poetry, and the Invention of Tenderness in the Early Roman Empire
  • Online publication: 26 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108883917.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Hérica Valladares, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Book: Painting, Poetry, and the Invention of Tenderness in the Early Roman Empire
  • Online publication: 26 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108883917.007
Available formats
×