Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:15:47.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2023

Jason Ralph
Jason Ralph
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
On Global Learning
Pragmatic Constructivism, International Practice and the Challenge of Global Governance
 , pp. 254 - 295
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Frederick M. (2021). Child-Proofing Global Public Health in Anticipation of Emergency. www.ila-americanbranch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/White-Paper-COVID19-Global-Governance-FINAL-April-2021.pdf.Google Scholar
Abraham, Kavi J. (2017). ‘Politics Lost?’ in Combes, DeRaismes ed., Can Networks Govern? An International Studies Quarterly Online Symposium, 6 October, 7–8 at www.dhnexon.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ISQSymposiumAvant.pdf.Google Scholar
Abraham, Kavi J. and Abramson, Yoni (2015). A Pragmatist Vocation for International Relations: The (Global) Public and Its Problems. European Journal of International Relations, 23 (1), 26–48.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization, 58 (2), 239–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2011). Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories beyond the West. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 39 (3), 619–37.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2013). Rethinking Power, Institutions and Ideas in World Politics Whose IR? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2014). Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58 (4), 647–59.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2016). Advancing Global IR: Challenges, Contentions, and Contributions. International Studies Review, 18 (1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (2007). Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7 (3), 287–312.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (2019). The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at Its Centenary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (2021). Re-imagining International Relations: World Orders in the Thought and Practice of Indian, Chinese, and Islamic Civilizations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke A. and True, Jacqui (2008). An Intersectional Analysis of International Relations. Politics and Gender, 4 (1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane (1902). Democracy and Social Ethics, New York: Macmillan. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane (2002 [1895]). ‘The Settlement as a Factor in the Labor Movement’ in Elshtain, Jean Bethke ed., The Jane Addams Reader, New York: Basic Books. Kindle Edition. [First published in 1895 in Hull House Maps and Papers, New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.]Google Scholar
Addams, Jane (2002 [1909]). ‘The Thirst for Righteousness’ in Elshtain, Jean Bethke ed., The Jane Addams Reader, New York: Basic Books. Kindle Edition. [First published in 1909 in The Spirit of Youth and City Streets, New York, Macmillan.]Google Scholar
Addams, Jane (2019 [1922]). Peace and Bread in Time of War: Activists on the Way to a 1915 Peace Conference, Washington DC: Ebooks for Students Ltd. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Adediran, Bolarinwa (2018). Reforming the Security Council through a Code of Conduct: A Sisyphean Task? Ethics & International Affairs, 32 (4), 463–82.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel (1992). The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control. International Organization, 46 (1), 101–46.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel (2005). Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel (2008). The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post – Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations, 14 (2), 195–230.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel (2019). World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (1998). ‘Security Communities in Theoretical Perspective’ in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael eds., Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–28.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Bernstein, Steven (2005). ‘Knowledge in Power: The Epistemic Construction of Global Governance’ in Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond eds., Power in Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 294–318.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Drieschova, Alena (2021). The Epistemological Challenge of Truth Subversion to the Liberal International Order. International Organization, 75 (2), 359–86.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Faubert, Michael (2022). ‘Epistemic Communities of Practice’ in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian and Hopf, Ted eds., Conceptualizing International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition, 47–76.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Haas, Peter (1992). Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order and the creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization, 46 (1), 367–90.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (2011). ‘International practices: introduction and framework’ in Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot eds., International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–35.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (2008). The Diplomacy of Opting Out: A Bourdieudian Approach to National Integration Strategies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46 (3), 663–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca and Pouliot, Vincent (2014). Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations, 20 (4), 889–911.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (2011). Performance and Power, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Alexander, Thomas M. (1993). John Dewey and the Moral Imagination: Beyond Putnam and Rorty toward a Postmodern Ethics. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 29 (3), 369–400.Google Scholar
Allan, Barry (2021). ‘Pragmatism and Confucian Empiricism’ in Ames, Roger T., Yajun, Chen and Hershock, Peter D., eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 59–69.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E. (2020). The WHO in the Age of the Coronavirus. American Journal of International Law, 114 (4), 578–87.Google Scholar
Ames, Roger T. (2021). ‘On the Cusp of a New World Order? A Dialogue between Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism’ in Ames, Roger T., Yajun, Chen and Hershock, Peter D. eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 176–205.Google Scholar
Ames, Roger T., Chen, Yajun and Peter, D. Hershock (2021). ‘Introduction’ in Roger T. Ames, Chen Yajun and Peter D. Hershock, eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 11–24.Google Scholar
Annan, Kofi (1999). Secretary-General Presents his Annual Report to General Assembly, 20 September at https://press.un.org/en/1999/19990920.sgsm7136.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ansell, Christopher (2011). Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Auteserre, Séverine (2014). Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah (2016). Pragmatic Networks and Transnational Governance of Private Military and Security Services. International Studies Quarterly, 60 (2), 330–42.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah (2017). ‘A Pragmatic Response’ in Combes, DeRaismes ed., Can Networks Govern? An International Studies Quarterly Online Symposium, 6 October, 13–15 at www.dhnexon.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ISQSymposiumAvant.pdf.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah (2021). ‘Mainstream Allergy to Pragmatism’s Femininities’ in Simon Frankel Pratt et al. Forum. Pragmatism in IR: The prospects of substantive theorizing. International Studies Review, 23 (4), 1940–2.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, Karin and Kuyper, Jonathan W. (2017). The Democratic Legitimacy of Orchestration: The UNFCCC, Non-state Actors, and Transnational Climate Governance. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 764–88.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette (1991). A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume’s Treatise, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bardosh, Kevin L. et al. (2020). Integrating the Social Sciences in Epidemic Preparedness and Response: A Strategic Framework to Strengthen Capacities and Improve Global Health Security. Globalization and Health, 16, 1–18.Google Scholar
Bargués, Pol (2020). Peacebuilding Without Peace? On How Pragmatism Complicates the Practice of International Intervention. Review of International Studies, 46 (2), 237–55.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel (2010). Realist Constructivism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel and Sjoberg, Laura (2019). International Relations’ Last Synthesis? Decoupling Constructivist and Critical Approaches, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Amy and Wallace Brown, Garrett (2011). ‘The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria: Expertise, Accountability and the Depoliticisation of Global Health Governance’ in Williams, Owain and Rushton, Simon eds., Partnerships and Foundations in Global Health Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 53–75.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Adler, Emanuel (1998). ‘Studying Security Communities in Theory, Comparison and History’ in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael eds., Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 413–41.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Weiss, Thomas G. (2011). Humanitarianism Contested: Where Angels Fear to Tread, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bauer, Harry and Brighi, Elisabetta, eds., (2009). Pragmatism in International Relations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beardsworth, Richard (2020). Climate Science, the Politics of Climate Change and Futures of IR. International Relations, 34 (3), 374–90.Google Scholar
Beck, Silke and Forsyth, Tim (2017). ‘Environmental Science and International Relations’ in Corry, Olaf and Stevenson, Hayley eds., Traditions and Trends in Global Environmental Politics: International Relations and the Earth, New York: Routledge, 81–99.Google Scholar
Beck, Silke and Mahony, Martin (2018). The IPCC and the New Map of Science and Politics. WIREs Climate Change, 3 July at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/wcc.547.Google Scholar
Behera, Navnita Chadha (2016). Knowledge Production. International Studies Review, 18 (1), 153–5.Google Scholar
Behuniak, Jim (2021). ‘Toward a Social Philosophy Dewey’s Newly Restored China Lectures’ in Ames, Roger T., Yajun, Chen and Hershock, Peter D. eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 128–43.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan (2018). Pragmatism and Prophecy: H. G. Wells and the Metaphysics of Socialism. The American Political Science Review, 112 (2), 409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. (2002). Pragmatic Solidarism and Dilemmas of Humanitarian Intervention. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 683–719.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. and Luck, Edward (2018). The Responsibility to Protect: From Promise to Practice, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex. J. and Šimonović, Ivan (2021). Introduction: Towards Evidence Based Atrocity Prevention. Journal of International Peacekeeping, 24 (3–4), 285–304.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Rob, Chilvers, Jason, and Vaughan, Naomi (2016). Deliberative Mapping of Options for Tackling Climate Change: Citizens and Specialists ‘Open Up’ Appraisal of Geoengineering. Public Understanding of Science, 25 (3), 269–86.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla (1986). Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Berling, Trine Villumsen (2012). Bourdieu, International Relations, and European Security. Theory and Society, 41 (5), 451–78.Google Scholar
Berling, Trine Villumsen (2015). The International Political Sociology of Security: Rethinking Theory and Practice, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. (2013). ‘Hegel and Pragmatism’ in Malachowski, Alan ed., The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 105–23.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. (2021). ‘John Dewey: Exemplar of the Democratic Public Intellectual’ in Ames, Roger T., Yajun, Chen and Hershock, Peter D. eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 26–40.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven and Laurence, Marion (2022). ‘Practices and Norms: Relationships, Disjunctures and Change’ in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian and Hopf, Ted eds., Conceptualizing International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition, 77–99.Google Scholar
Biesta, Gert (2006). ‘“Of All Affairs, Communication Is the Most Wonderful”. The Communicative Turn in Dewey’s Democracy and Education’ in Hansen, David T. ed., John Dewey and Our Educational Prospect. A Critical Engagement with Dewey’s Democracy and Education, New York: State University of New York Press, 23–37.Google Scholar
Bigo, Didier (2002). Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives, 27 (1), 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigo, Didier (2013). ‘Security: Analyzing Transnational Professionals of (in)Security in Europe’ in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca ed., Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, London: Routledge, 114–30.Google Scholar
Bigo, Didier (2016). ‘International Political Sociology’ in Bossong, Raphael and Rhinard, Mark eds., Theorising Internal Security in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 64–81.Google Scholar
Bilgin, Pinar (2008). Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly, 29 (1), 5–23.Google Scholar
Bilgin, Pinar (2016). Contrapuntal Reading as a Method, an Ethos, and a Metaphor for Global IR. International Studies Review, 18 (1), 134–46.Google Scholar
Biswas, Shampa (2001). ‘Nuclear Apartheid’ as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Discourse. Alternatives, 26 (4), 485–522.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Eric M. (2020). Combing the Same Beach: Analytic Eclecticism and the Challenge of Theoretical Multilingualism. International Journal, 75 (3), 404–19.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Alan (2016). Norm Antipreneurs and Theorising Resistance to Normative Change. Review of International Studies, 42 (2), 310–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, Alexandra and Wallace Brown, Garrett (2020). R2P and Prevention: the International Community and Its Role in the Determinants of Mass Atrocity. Global Responsibility to Protect 13 (1), 60–95.Google Scholar
Bohman, James (1999). Democracy as Inquiry, Inquiry as Democratic: Pragmatism, Social Science, and the Cognitive Division of Labor. American Journal of Political Science, 43 (2), 590–607.Google Scholar
Bookman, Myra (2002). ‘Forming Competence: Habermas on Reconstructing Worlds and Context-Transcendent Reason’ in Aboulafia, Mitchell, Bookman, Myra, and Kemp, Catherine eds., Habermas and Pragmatism, London and New York: Taylor and Francis, 65–80.Google Scholar
Boot, Max (2004). Neocons. Foreign Policy, 140, 20–8.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken (1994). Military Intervention: Duty and Prudence, in Freedman, Lawrence ed., Military Intervention in European Conflicts (Political Quarterly Special Issue), London: Blackwell Publishers, 56–72.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken (1997). ‘Security and Self: Reflections of a Fallen Realist’ in Krause, Keith and Williams, Michael C. eds., Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 83–119.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken (1999a). ‘Three Tyrannies’ in Dunne, Tim and Wheeler, Nicholas J. eds., Human Rights in Global Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 31–70.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken (1999b). Nuclearism, Human Rights and Construction of Security (Part 1). The International Journal of Human Rights, 3 (2), 1–24.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken (1999c). Nuclearism, Human Rights and Constructions of Security (Part 2). The International Journal of Human Rights, 3 (3), 44–61.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken ed. (2005). Critical Security Studies and World Politics, London and Boulder: Lynne Reinner Publishers.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken (2007). Theory of World Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken and Dunne, Tim (1999). ‘Learning Beyond Frontiers’ in Dunne, Tim and Wheeler, Nicholas J. eds., Human Rights in Global Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 303–29.Google Scholar
Bosco David, L. (2014). Assessing the UN Security Council: A Concert Perspective. Global Governance, 20 (4), 545–61.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990). The Logic of Practice, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (2000). Pascalian Meditations, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (2001). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique, précédé de trois études d’ethnologie Kabyle, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bower, Adam (2020). Entrapping Gulliver: The United States and the Antipersonnel Mine Ban. Security Studies, 29 (1), 128–61.Google Scholar
Boyte, Harry C. (2007). Populism and John Dewey Convergences and Contradictions. University of Michigan Dewey Lecture, March 29 at academia.eduGoogle Scholar
Bray, Daniel (2009). Pragmatic Cosmopolitanism. A Deweyan Approach to Democracy beyond the Nation-State. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 37 (3), 683–719.Google Scholar
Bray, Daniel (2011). Pragmatic Cosmopolitanism: Representation and Leadership in Transnational Democracy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bray, Daniel (2013). Pragmatic Ethics and the Will to Believe in Cosmopolitanism. International Theory, 5 (3), 446–76.Google Scholar
Breslauer, George W. and Tetlock, Philip E. (1991). ‘Introduction’ in Breslauer, George W. and Tetlock, Philip E. eds., Learning in U.S. and Soviet Foreign Policy, Boulder: Westview Press, 1–19.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris (1999). ‘Universal Human Rights: A Critique’ in Dunne, Tim and Wheeler, Nicholas J. eds., Human Rights in Global Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–27.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris (2012). The ‘Practice Turn’, Phronesis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory? Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 40 (3), 439–56.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris (2022a). ‘If Not Rome or The Hague, Where? Reflections on Sanctioning and Punishing’ in Hellmann, Gunther and Steffek, Jens eds., Praxis as a Perspective on International Politics, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 97–111.Google Scholar
Brown, Faye (2022b). Putin Ramps Up Nuclear Threat: ‘We Don’t Brag, We Will Use Them’. Metro, 27 April at https://metro.co.uk/2022/04/27/vladimir-putin-ramps-up-nuclear-threat-we-dont-brag-we-will-use-them-16546440/.Google Scholar
Brown, Garrett Wallace (2010). Safeguarding Deliberative Global Governance: The Case of The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Review of International Studies, 36 (2), 511–30.Google Scholar
Brown, Garrett Wallace (2015). Knowledge, Politics and Power in Global Health: Comment on ‘Knowledge, Moral Claims and the Exercise of Power in Global Health’. International Journal of Health Policy Management, 4, 111–13.Google Scholar
Brown, Matthew J. (2013). ‘Science, Values and Democracy in the Global Climate Change Debate’, in Ralston, Shane, ed., Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations, Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books, 127–58.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, Hauke (2002). Globalising Democracy Without a State: Weak Public, Strong Public, Global Constitutionalism. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 675–90.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian (2014). Pathways to Practice: Praxiography and International Politics. European Political Science Review, 6 (3), 383–406.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian (2015). Making Things Known: Epistemic Practices, the United Nations, and the Translation of Piracy. International Political Sociology, 9 (1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian (2018). Territory, Authority, Expertise: Global Governance and the Counter-Piracy Assemblage. European Journal of International Relations, 24 (3), 614–37.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian and Edmunds, Tim (2021). Pragmatic Ordering. Informality, Experimentation and the Maritime Security Agenda. Review of International Studies, 47 (2), 171–91.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian and Gadinger, Frank (2014). International Practice Theory. New Perspectives, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian and Gadinger, Frank (2015). The Play of International Practice. International Studies Quarterly 59 (3), 449–60.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2004). From International to World society? : English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2015). The Global Transformation. History, Modernity and the Making of the Making of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Capie, David (2012). The Responsibility to Protect Norm in Southeast Asia: Framing, Resistance and the Localization Myth. The Pacific Review, 25 (1), 75–93.Google Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett (1939). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919 to 1939, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey (2001). ‘Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization, 55 (3), 553–88.Google Scholar
Chen, Jia (2021a). ‘Harmony in the Arts. The Sense of Communication in Confucian and Deweyan Aesthetics’ in Ames, Roger T., Chen, Yajun and Hershock, Peter D. eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism. Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 70–84.Google Scholar
Chen, Yajun (2021b). ‘The Core of Pragmatism and Its Echo in Chinese Philosophy’ in Ames, Roger T., Chen, Yajun and Hershock, Peter D. eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism. Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 42–57.Google Scholar
Chernoff, Fred (2020). Pragmatism, Pluralism, and Eclecticism: Sil and Katzenstein’s ‘Analytic Eclecticism’ in Beyond Paradigms. International Journal, 75 (3), 392–403.Google Scholar
Chernoff, Fred, Cornut, Jérémie, and James, Patrick (2020). Analytic Eclecticism and International Relations: Promises and Pitfalls. International Journal, 75 (3), 383–91.Google Scholar
Christoff, Peter (2010). Cold climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15. Environmental Politics, 19 (4), 637–56.Google Scholar
Claude, Jr. IL. (1971). Swords into Plowshares. The Problems and Progress of International Organization, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly (1999). Normative Theory in International Relations. A Pragmatic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly (2002a). A Democratic Critique of Cosmopolitan Democracy: Pragmatism from the Bottom-Up. European Journal of International Relations, 8 (4), 517–48.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly (2002b). Deweyan Pragmatism and Post-Positivist Social Science in IR. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 525–48.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly (2009). ‘Conceptualizing the Power of Transnational Agents: Pragmatism and International Public Spheres’ in Geenens, Raf and Tinnevelt, Ronald eds., Does Truth Matter? Democracy and Public Space, Dordrecht: Springer, 167–86.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly (2010). ‘Dewey as an International Thinker’ in Cochran, Molly ed., The Cambridge Companion to Dewey, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 309–36.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly (2012). Pragmatism and International Relations. A Story of Closure and Opening. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 4, 1–22.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly (2013). ‘Hedley Bull and John Dewey: Two Middle Grounders and a Pragmatic Approach to the Nuclear Dilemma’ in Navari, Cornelia ed., Ethical Reasoning in International Affairs: Arguments from the Middle Ground, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 158–81.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly (2017). ‘The “Newer Ideals” of Jane Addams’s Progressivism’ in Cochran, Molly and Navari, Cornelia eds., Progressivism and US Foreign Policy between the World Wars, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 143–65.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly (2021). Whose Pragmatism? Which IR? In Simon Frankel Pratt et al. Forum. Pragmatism in IR: The prospects of substantive theorizing. International Studies Review, 23 (4), 1943–5.Google Scholar
Coll, Alberto R. (1991). Normative Prudence as a Tradition of Statecraft. Ethics and International Affairs, 5 (1), 33–51.Google Scholar
Collins, Alan (2013). Norm Diffusion and ASEAN’s Adoption and Adaption of Global HIV/AIDS Norms. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 13 (3), 369–97.Google Scholar
Cooper, Andrew F. and English, John (2005). ‘International Governance and the Mind of Global Governance’, in Thakur, Ramesh, Cooper, Andrew F. and English, John eds., International Commissions and the Power of Ideas, New York: United Nations University Press, 1–26.Google Scholar
Cooper, Andrew F. and Pouliot, Vincent (2015). How Much Is Global Governance Changing? The G20 as International Practice. Cooperation and Conflict, 5 (3), 334–50.Google Scholar
Cormier, Harvey (2012). Reconsidering Obama the Pragmatist. The New York Times, 14 October at http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com.Google Scholar
Cornut, Jérémie (2015). To Be a Diplomat Abroad: Diplomatic Practice at Embassies. Cooperation and Conflict, 50 (3), 385–401.Google Scholar
Cornut, Jérémie (2018). Diplomacy, Agency, and the Logic of Improvisation and Virtuosity in Practice. European Journal of International Relations, 24 (3) 712–36.Google Scholar
Corry, Olaf (2019). Nature and the International: Towards a Materialist Understanding of Societal Multiplicity. Globalizations, 17 (3) 419–35.Google Scholar
Craig, Campbell (2003). Glimmer of a New Leviathan. Total War in the Realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau and Waltz, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Campbell (2019). Solving the Nuclear Dilemma: Is a World State Necessary? Journal of International Political Theory, 15 (3), 349–66.Google Scholar
Crossley, Nick (2013). Habit and Habitus. Body & Society, 19 (2–3), 136–61.Google Scholar
Dancy, Geoff (2016). Human Rights Pragmatism: Belief, Inquiry, and Pragmatism. European Journal of International Relations, 22 (3), 512–35.Google Scholar
Danielsson, Anna (2020). Reconceptualising the Politics of Knowledge Authority in Post/Conflict Interventions: From a Peacebuilding Field to Transnational Fields of Interventionary Objects. European Journal of International Security, 5 (1), 115–33.Google Scholar
Davies, Sara E. (2019). Containing Contagion. The Politics of Disease Outbreaks in South East Asia, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Sara E. and Wenham, Clare (2020). Why the COVID-19 Response Needs International Relations. International Affairs, 96 (5), 1227–51.Google Scholar
Davies, Sara E., Kamradt-Scott, Adam, and Rushton, Simon (2015). Disease Diplomacy. International Norms and Global Health Security, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Gráinne, Keohane, Robert, and Sabel, Charles (2014). Global Experimentalist Governance. British Journal of Political Science, 44 (3), 477–86.Google Scholar
Deer, Cécile (2008). ‘Reflexivity’ in Grenfell, Michael ed., Pierre Bourdieu. Key Concepts, Durham: Acumen, 199–212.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole and Zimmermann, Lisbeth (2019). Norms under Challenge: Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4 (1), 2–17.Google Scholar
Depledge, Joanna, Saldivia, Miguel and Peñasco, Cristina (2022). Glass Half Full or Glass Half Empty? The 2021 Glasgow Climate Conference. Climate Policy, 22 (2), 147–57.Google Scholar
DeShore, Naomi et al. (2020). An Evaluation of the Global Health Security Agenda Steering Group Governance Interventions. European Journal of Public Health, 30 (5), 593–4 at https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/30/Supplement_5/ckaa166.174/5913978.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel H. (2007). Bounding Power. Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village, Oxford and Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel H. (2019). Going Critical: Toward a Modified Nuclear One Worldism. Journal of International Political Theory, 15 (3), 367–85.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1927). The Public and Its Problems, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1929). The Quest for Certainty. A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action, London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1934). Intelligence and Power. New Republic, 25 April at https://newrepublic.com/article/100340/intelligence-and-power.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1962 [1934]). A Common Faith, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1965 [1908a]). ‘The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy’ in Dewey, John ed., The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy, and Other Essays in Contemporary Thought. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1–19.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1965 [1908b]). ‘Intelligence and Morals’ in Dewey, John ed., The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy, and Other Essays in Contemporary Thought, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 46–76.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1972 [1920]). Reconstruction in Philosophy, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1897]). ‘My Pedagogic Creed’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 229–35. [First published in 1897 in School Journal LIV, 77–80.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1915]). ‘The Logic of Judgments of Practice’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic, Psychology, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 236–71. [First published in 1915 in Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 12, 505–23, 533–43.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1916]). ‘Nationalizing Education’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 265–9. [First published in 1916 in Journal of Education 84, 425–8.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1922a]). ‘The Place of Habit in Conduct’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic and Psychology, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 24–49. [First published in 1922 in Human Nature and Conduct.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1922b]). ‘Valuation and Experimental Knowledge’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic, Psychology. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 272–86. [First Published in 1922 in Philosophical Review (31), 325–51.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1922c]). ‘The Good Activity’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic, Psychology, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 321–8. [First published in 1922 in Human Nature and Conduct.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1925a]). ‘The Development of American Pragmatism’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education, Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 3–13. [First published in 1925 in Studies in the History of Ideas, ed., Department of Philosophy, Columbia University.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1925b]). ‘Existence, Value and Criticism.’ From Experience and Nature in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education, Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 84–101.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1925c]). ‘Nature, Communication and Meaning.’ From Experience and Nature in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic, Psychology, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 50–66.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1927a]). ‘The Pragmatic Acquiescence’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 33–6. [First published in 1927 in New Republic 49, 186–9.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1927b]). ‘The Search for the Public’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 281–92. [First published in 1927 in The Public and Its Problems.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1928a]). ‘The Inclusive Philosophic Idea’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 308–15. [First published in 1928 in Monist 38, 161–77.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1928b]). ‘A Critique of American Civilization’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 316–22. [First published in 1928 in World Tomorrow 11, 391–5.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1932a]). ‘Moral Judgment and Knowledge’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic and Psychology, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 328–40. [From Ethics in 1932.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1932b]). ‘The Moral Self’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic and Psychology, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 341–54. [From Ethics in 1932.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1935]). ‘Renascent Liberalism’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 323–36. [From Liberalism and Social Action in 1935.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1998 [1939]). ‘Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 340–3. [First published in 1939 in John Dewey and the Promise of America, Progressive Education Booklet No. 14, Columbus Ohio: American Education Press, 12–17.]Google Scholar
Dewey, John (2011 [1916]). Democracy and Education, Milton Keynes: Simon and Brown.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (2015 [1938]). Experience and Education, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Docherty, Benedict, Mathieu, Xavier and Ralph, Jason (2020). R2P and the Arab Spring. Norm Localization and the US Response to the Early Syria Crisis. Global Responsibility to Protect, 12 (3), 246–70.Google Scholar
Drieschova, Alena and Bueger, Christian (2022). ‘Conceptualizing International Practices. Establishing a Research Agenda in Conversations’ in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian and Hopf, Ted eds., Conceptualizing International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition, 3–27.Google Scholar
Drolet, Jean-François (2011). American Neoconservatism. The Politics and Culture of a Reactionary Idealism, London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. (2004). Pragmatism and Democracy: In Search of Deliberative Publics. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 18 (1), 72–9.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. and Pickering, Jonathan (2019). The Politics of the Anthropocene, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S., Bächtiger, André and Milewicz, Karolina (2011). Toward a Deliberative Global Citizens’ Assembly. Global Policy, 2 (1), 33–42.Google Scholar
Du Bois, W.E.B. (1903). The Souls of Black Folk : Essays and Sketches, Chicago: A. C. McClurg and co.Google Scholar
Duff, H. Jonathan et al. (2021). A Global Public Health Convention for the 21st Century. The Lancet Public Health, 6 (6) e428–e433 at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33964227/.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim and Booth, Ken (1999). ‘Learning beyond Frontiers’ in Dunne, Tim and Wheeler, Nicholas J. eds., Human Rights in Global Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 303–28.Google Scholar
Duvall, Raymond and Chowdhury, Arjun (2011). ‘Practices of Theory’ in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent eds., International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–54.Google Scholar
Eaton, Lynn (2021). Covid-19: WHO Warns against “Vaccine Nationalism” or Face Further Virus Mutations. BMJ, 372 at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33526414/.Google Scholar
Eckersley, Robyn (2012). Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations: Multilateralism or Minilateralism? Global Environmental Politics, 12 (2), 24–42.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke ed. (2002). The Jane Addams Reader, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte (2013). ‘Norms. Bourdieu’s Nomos, Or the Structural Power of Norms’ in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca ed., Bourdieu in International Relations. Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, London: Routledge, 165–78.Google Scholar
Ercan, Pinar Gözen (2016). Debating the Future of the Responsibility to Protect, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Erfani, Parsa et al. (2021). Intellectual Property Waiver for Covid-19 Vaccines will Advance Global Health Equity. BMJ, 374 August, online at www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1837.Google Scholar
Erskine, Toni (2012). Whose Progress, Which Morals? Constructivism, Normative IR Theory and the Limits and Possibilities of Studying Ethics in World Politics. International Theory, 4 (3), 449–68.Google Scholar
Erskine, Toni (2016). ‘Moral Agents of Protection and Supplementary Responsibilities to Protect’ in Bellamy, Alex and Dunne, Tim eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 167–85.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew (1995). The Paradox of State Strength: Transnational Relations, Domestic Structures, and Security Policy in Russia and the Soviet Union. International Organization, 49 (1), 1–38.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew (1999). Unarmed Forces. The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Falkner, Robert (2016a). The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics. International Affairs, 92 (5), 1107–25.Google Scholar
Falkner, Robert (2016b). A Minilateral Solution for Global Climate Change? On Bargaining Efficiency, Club Benefits and International Legitimacy. Perspectives on Politics, 14 (1), 87–101.Google Scholar
Falkner, Robert (2017). ‘International Climate Politics Between Pluralism and Solidarism. An English School Perspective’ in Corry, Olaf and Stevenson, Hayley eds., Traditions and Trends in Global Environmental Politics: International Relations and the Earth, London: Routledge, 26–44.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo and Lambert, Hélène (2001). Courting Controversy: International Law, National Norms and American Nuclear Use. Review of International Studies, 27 (3), 309–26.Google Scholar
Ferhani, Adam and Rushton, Simon (2020). The International Health Regulations, COVID-19, and Bordering Practices: Who Gets in, What Gets Out, and Who Gets Rescued? Contemporary Security Policy, 41 (3), 458–77.Google Scholar
Fesmire, Steven (2020). ‘Pragmatist Ethics and Climate Change’ in Miller, Dale and Eggleston, Ben eds., Moral Theory and Climate Change: Ethical Perspectives on a Warming Planet, London: Routledge. Preprint Online.Google Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew (1997). Pragmatism and Political Theory: From Dewey to Rorty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fidler, David P. (2003). SARS: Political Pathology of the First Post-Westphalian Pathogen. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (4), 485–505.Google Scholar
Fierke, Karin M. (2013). ‘Constructivism’ in Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve eds., International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 161–78.Google Scholar
Fierke, Karin M. (2020). ‘Knowing, Remembering, Showing But Still Not Seeing: Critical Praxis, Slavery and the Modern “We”’ in Hellmann, Gunther and Steffek, Jens eds., Praxis as a Perspective on International Politics, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 19–32.Google Scholar
Fierke, Karin M. and Jabri, Vivienne (2019). Global Conversations: Relationality, Embodiment and Power in the Move Towards a Global IR. Global Constitutionalism, 8 (3), 506–35.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn, Sikkink (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52 (4), 887–917.Google Scholar
Franke, Ulrich and Weber, Ralph (2011). At the Papini Hotel: On Pragmatism in the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 18 (4), 669–91.Google Scholar
Fraundorfer, Markus (2015). Brazil’s Emerging Role in Global Governance: Health, Food Security and Bioenergy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fraundorfer, Markus (2022). Global Governance and the Anthropocene, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence (1988). I Exist; Therefore I Deter. International Security, 13 (1), 177–95.Google Scholar
Frega, Roberto (2014a). Between Pragmatism and Critical Theory: Social Philosophy Today. Human Studies, 37 (1), 57–82.Google Scholar
Frega, Roberto (2014b). The Normative Creature: Toward a Practice-Based Account of Normativity. Social Theory and Practice, 40 (1), 1–27.Google Scholar
Frega, Roberto (2017). Pragmatism and Democracy in a Global World. Review of International Studies, 43 (4), 720–41.Google Scholar
Frega, Roberto (2019). Pragmatism and the Wide View of Democracy, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. In Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frieden, Thomas R. and Buissonnière, Marine (2021). Will a Global Preparedness Treaty Help or Hinder Pandemic Preparedness? BMJ Global Health 6, 1–3 at https://gh.bmj.com/content/6/5/e006297.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg and Kratochwil, Friedrich (2009). On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology. International Organization 63 (4), 701–31.Google Scholar
Gadinger, Frank (2016). On Justification and Critique: Luc Boltanski’s Pragmatic Sociology and International Relations. International Political Sociology, 10 (3), 187–205.Google Scholar
Gadinger, Frank (2022). ‘The Normativity of International Practices’ in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian and Hopf, Ted eds., Conceptualising International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 100–21.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Adrian (2014). What Constitutes a ‘Manifest Failing’? Ambiguous and Inconsistent Terminology and the Responsibility to Protect. International Relations, 28 (4), 428–44.Google Scholar
Garrison, Jim (1999). John Dewey’s Theory of Practical Reasoning, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 31 (3), 291–31.Google Scholar
Garrison, Jim (2006). The ‘Permanent Deposit’ of Hegelian Thought in Dewey’s Theory of Inquiry. Educational Theory, 56 (1), 1–37.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. (1983). Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–95.Google Scholar
Giesecke, Johan (2019). The Truth about PHEICs. The Lancet, July 5 at www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2819%2931566-1.Google Scholar
Glanville, Luke (2014). Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect. A New History, Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Glanville, Luke (2016). Does R2P Matter? Interpreting the Impact of a Norm. Cooperation and Conflict, 51 (2), 184–99.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O., eds., (1993). Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gostin, Lawrence O., Moon, Suerie, and Meier, Benjamin Mason, (2020). Reimagining Global Health Governance in the Age of COVID-19. American Journal of Public Health, 110, 1615–19, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33026872/.Google Scholar
Grimmel, Andreas and Hellmann, Gunther (2019). Theory Must Not Go on Holiday. Wittgenstein, the Pragmatists, and the Idea of Social Science. International Political Sociology, 13 (2), 198–214.Google Scholar
Gruszczynski, Lukasz and Melillo, Margherita (2022). The Uneasy Coexistence of Expertise and Politics in the World Health Organization. Learning from the Experience of the Early Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Organizations Law Review, 19 (2), 301–31.Google Scholar
Guarner, Jeannette (2020). Three Emerging Coronaviruses in Two Decades: The Story of SARS, MERS, and Now COVID-19. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 153 (4), 420–1.Google Scholar
Guéhenno, Jean-Marie (2015). The Fog of Peace. A Memoir of International Peacekeeping in the 21st Century, Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. (1991). ‘Collective Learning: Some Theoretical Speculations’ in Breslauer, George W. and Tetlock, Philip E. eds., Learning in U.S. and Soviet Foreign Policy, Boulder: Westview Press, 62–99.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. (2017). The Epistemic Authority of Solution-Oriented Global Environmental Assessments. Environmental Science and Policy, 77, 221–4.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. and Haas, Ernst B. (2002). Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 573–601.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1993). Justification and Application, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions of Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hanrieder, Tine (2020). Priorities, Partners, Politics: The WHO’s Mandate beyond the Crisis. Global Governance, 26 (4), 535–43.Google Scholar
Hanrieder, Tine and Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian (2014). WHO Decides on the Exception? Securitization and Emergency Governance in Global Health. Security Dialogue, 45 (4), 331–34.Google Scholar
Harman, Sophie (2018). Global Health Governance, in Weiss, Thomas G. and Wilkinson, Rorden eds., International Organization and Global Governance, London and New York: Routledge, 719–31.Google Scholar
Harrabin, Roger (2021). US Climate Envoy Criticized for Optimism over Clean Tech. BBC News, 17 May at bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-57135506.Google Scholar
Harris, John (2020). If Democracy Looks Doomed, Extinction Rebellion May Have an Answer. The Guardian, 30 August at www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/30/extinction-rebellion-democracy-climate-emergency-bill-citizens-assembly.Google Scholar
Hassoun, Nicole (2021). Against Vaccine Nationalism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47 (11) 15 February at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33589473/.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan (2017). Introduction. Symposium on Contestation and International Relations. Polity, 49 (1), 100–8.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan (2018). ‘Social Constructivism and International Ethics’ in Steele, Brent J. and Eric Heinze, Eric A. eds., Routledge Handbook of Ethics and International Relations, London: Routledge, 116–29.Google Scholar
He, Ming Fang (2013). East∼West Epistemological Convergence of Humanism in Language, Identity, and Education: Confucius, Makiguchi and Dewey. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 12 (1), 61–70.Google Scholar
Hehir, Aidan (2012). The Responsibility to Protect. Rhetoric, Reality and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hehir, Aidan (2013). The Permanence of Inconsistency. Libya, the Security Council, and the Responsibility to Protect. International Security, 38 (1), 137–59.Google Scholar
Hehir, Aidan (2019). Hollow Norms and the Responsibility to Protect, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hellmann, Gunther (2009). Beliefs as Rules for Action: Pragmatism as Theory of Thought and Action. International Studies Review, 11 (3), 638–41.Google Scholar
Hellmann, Gunther (2022). ‘Practising Theorizing in Theorizing Practice: Friedrich Kratochwil and Social Inquiry’ in Hellmann, Gunther and Steffek, Jens eds., Practice as a Perspective on International Politics, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 72–93.Google Scholar
Herman, Robert G. (1996). ‘Identity, Norms and National Security: The Soviet Foreign Policy Revolution and the End of the Cold War’ in Katzenstein, Peter J. ed., The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, 272–316.Google Scholar
Herz, John (1960). International Politics in the Atomic Age, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hesengerth, Oliver (2015). Global Norms in Domestic Politics: Environmental Norm Contestation in Cambodia’s Hydropower Sector, The Pacific Review, 28 (4) 505–28.Google Scholar
Heymann, David L. (2013). How SARS Was Contained. New York Times, March 14 at www.nytimes.com/2013/03/15/opinion/global/how-sars-was-contained.html.Google Scholar
Hilde, Thomas C. (2012). Uncertainty and the Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Deliberation in Climate Change Adaptation. Democratization, 19 (5), 889–911.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, David (2013). ‘Dewey’s Pragmatism: Instrumentalism and Meliorism’ in Malachowski, Alan ed., The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 55–82.Google Scholar
Hildreth, Roudy W. (2009). Reconstructing Dewey on Power. Political Theory, 37 (6), 780–807.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew J. (2009). Is Constructivist Ethics an Oxymoron? International Studies Review, 11 (2), 231–52.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew J. (2018). ‘Climate Change’ in Weiss, Thomas and Wilkinson, Rorden eds., International Organization and Global Governance, London: Routledge, 655–66.Google Scholar
Hofius, Maren (2021). ‘Practice Approaches in International Political Theory’ in Paipais, Vassilios ed., Perspectives on International Political Theory in Europe, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 87–106.Google Scholar
Hofius, Maren (2022). Diplomacy at the Frontlines: Knowing and Ordering in Crisis. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 18 (1), 1–34.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (1998). Democracy as Reflexive Cooperation. John Dewey and the Theory of Democracy Today. Political Theory, 26 (6), 763–83.Google Scholar
Hook, Sidney (1959–60). Pragmatism and the Tragic Sense of Life. Proceedings and Address of the American Philosophical Association 33, 5–26.Google Scholar
Hook, Sidney (1974). Education and the Taming of Power, London: Alcove Press.Google Scholar
Hookway, Christopher (2013). ‘“The Principle of Peirce” and the Origins of Pragmatism’ in Malachowski, Alan ed., The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17–35.Google Scholar
Hoover, Joe (2016). Reconstructing Human Rights. A Pragmatist and Pluralist Inquiry in Global Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23 (1), 171–200.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted (2010). The Logic of Habit in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 16 (4), 539–61.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted (2018). Change in International Practices. European Journal of International Relations, 24 (3), 687–711.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted (2022). ‘Critiques of the Practice Turn in IR Theory: Some Responses’ in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian and Hopf, Ted eds., Conceptualizing International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition, 28–44.Google Scholar
Horner, Rory (2021). Covax Misses Its 2021 Delivery Target – What’s Gone Wrong in the Fight against Vaccine Nationalism? The Conversation, 17 September at https://theconversation.com/covax-misses-its-2021-delivery-target-whats-gone-wrong-in-the-fight-against-vaccine-nationalism-167753.Google Scholar
Howlett, Charles F. (2017). ‘John Dewey: A Pragmatist’s Search for Peace in the Aftermath of Total War’ in Cochran, Molly and Navari, Cornelia eds., Progressivism and US Foreign Policy between the World Wars, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 117–42.Google Scholar
Hughes, Hannah (2015). Bourdieu and the IPCC’s Symbolic Power. Global Environmental Politics, 15 (4), 85–104.Google Scholar
Hughes, Hannah and Paterson, M. (2017). Narrowing the Climate Field: The Symbolic Power of Authors in the IPCC’s Assessment of Mitigation. The Review of Policy Research, 34 (6), 744–66.Google Scholar
Hughes, Lesley and Morgan, Wesley (2021). Good COP, Bad COP: Climate Wins and Losses from Glasgow. Sydney Morning Herald, 14 November at www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/good-cop-bad-cop-climate-wins-and-losses-from-glasgow-20211114-p598rq.html.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (1998). ‘An Emerging Security Community in South America’ in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael eds., Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 228–64.Google Scholar
Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response for the WHO Executive Board (2021a). Second Progress Report, January at https://theindependentpanel.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Independent-Panel_Second-Report-on-Progress_Final-15-Jan-2021.pdf.Google Scholar
Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response for the WHO Executive Board (2021b). COVID-19: Make it the Last Pandemic, May at https://theindependentpanel.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/COVID-19-Make-it-the-Last-Pandemic_final.pdf.Google Scholar
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) (2001). The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
International Court of Justice (1996). Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. Advisory Opinion. 8 July at https://web.archive.org/web/20171013111831/ www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/95/095-19960708-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf.Google Scholar
IHR (International Health Regulations) (2005) World Health Organization at www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241580496.Google Scholar
IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.Google Scholar
IPCC (2021). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2021). Pragmatism and Academic Responsibility. In Simon Frankel Pratt et al. Forum. Pragmatism in IR: The prospects of substantive theorizing. International Studies Review, 23 (4), 1945–8.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2022). ‘Between Science and Politics: Friedrich Kratochwil’s Praxis of “Going On”’ in Hellmann, Gunther and Steffek, Jens eds., Praxis as a Perspective on International Politics, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 234–54.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H. (1999). Relations Before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics. European Journal of International Relations, 5 (3), 291–332.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H. (2019). Reclaiming the Social: Relationalism in Anglophone International Studies. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (5), 582–600.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert (2000). The Global Covenant. Human Conduct in a World of States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, Cecilia and Mennecke, Martin (2019). Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: A Future Agenda, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
James, William (2000) Gunn, Giles, ed., Pragmatism and Other Writings, New York: Penguin Classics. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
James, William (2005 [1896]). ‘The Will to Believe’ in Capps, John M. and Capps, Donald eds., James and Dewey on Belief and Experience, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
James, William (2011 [1906]) The Moral Equivalent of War Forward by Charles River Editors. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
James, William (2019 [1907]). Pragmatism. DigiReads.com Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Samuel (2022). The Limits of Common Humanity. Motivating the Responsibility to Protect in a Changing Global Order, Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Jetschke, Anja and Liese, Andrea (2013). ‘The Power of Human Rights a Decade After: From Euphoria to Contestation?’ in Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen and Sikkink, Kathryn eds., The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 26–42.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (1992). An Underestimated Alternative: America and the Limits of ‘Critical Theory’. Symbolic Interaction, 15 (3), 261–75.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (1996). The Creativity of Action, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Richard Wyn (2005). ‘On Emancipation: Necessity, Capacity, and Concrete Utopias’ in Booth, Ken ed., Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder, London: Lynne Rienner, 215–35.Google Scholar
Kaag, John (2013). ‘Pragmatism, Militarism and Political Unity’ in Ralston, Shane ed., Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations, Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books, 71–85.Google Scholar
Kaag, John and Kreps, Sarah (2012). Pragmatism’s Contributions to International Relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25 (2), 191–208.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. ed. (1996). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kavalski, Emilian (2018). Guanxi or What Is the Chinese for Relational Theory of World Politics. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 18 (3), 397–420.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998). Activists beyond Borders : Advocacy Networks in International Politics, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kenkel, Kai Michael and De Rosa, Felippe (2015). Localization and Subsidiarity in Brazil’s Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect, 7 (3–4), 325–49.Google Scholar
Kikoler, Naomi (2016). ‘Guinea: An Overlooked Case of the Responsibility to Prevent in Practice’ in Sharma, Serena K. and Welsh, Jennifer eds., The Responsibility to Prevent. Overcoming the Challenges of Atrocity Prevention, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 304–23.Google Scholar
King, Anthony (2000). Thinking with Bourdieu Against Bourdieu: A ‘Practical’ Critique of the Habitus. Sociological Theory, 18 (3), 417–33.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan (2019). The Normative Gap in International Organizations Law: The Case of the World Health Organization. International Organizations Law Review, 16 (2), 272–98.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie (1995). Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions Against South Africa. International Organization, 49 (3), 451–78.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie (1999). Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid, London, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Knafo, Samuel (2016). Bourdieu and the Dead End of Reflexivity: On the Impossible Task of Locating the Subject. Review of International Studies, 42 (1), 25–47.Google Scholar
Knopf, Jeffrey W. (2012). The Concept of Nuclear Learning. The Nonproliferation Review, 19 (1), 79–93.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin (2001). ‘Objectual Practice’ in Schatzki, Theodore R., Knorr Cetina, Karin and von Savigny, Eike eds., The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich (2009). ‘Ten Points to Ponder About Pragmatism: Some Critical Reflections on Knowledge Generation in the Social Sciences’ in Bauer, Harry and Brighi, Elisabetta eds., Pragmatism in International Relations, New York: Routledge, 11–25.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich (2011). ‘Making Sense of International Practices’ in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent eds., International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 36–60.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich (2018). Praxis. On Acting and Knowing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krause, Keith and Williams, Michael C. eds., (1997). Critical Security Studies. Concepts and Strategies, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krishtel, Priti, and Malpani, Rohit (2021). Suspend Intellectual Property Rights for Covid-19 Vaccines. BMJ, 28 May at www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1344.short.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona L. and True, Jacqui (2012). Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality. European Journal of International Relations, 18 (1), 103–27.Google Scholar
Kurki, Milja (2020). International Relations in a Relational Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuyper, J. 2015. ‘Gridlock in Global Climate Change Negotiations: Two Democratic Arguments Against Minilateralism’ in McKinnon, Catriona and Maltais, Aaron eds., The Ethics of Climate Governance, New York: Rowman and Littlefield Press, 67–88.Google Scholar
Lachs, John (2005). Stoic Pragmatism. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 19 (2), 95–106.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. (2013). Theory Is Dead, Long Live Theory: The End of the Great Debates and the Rise of Eclecticism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 19 (3), 567–87.Google Scholar
Lakhani, Nina (2021). Cop26 Legitimacy Questioned as Groups Excluded from Crucial Talks. The Guardian, 8 November at www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/nov/08/cop26-legitimacy-questioned-as-groups-excluded-from-crucial-talks.Google Scholar
Lambert, Harry (2022). Tobias Ellwood: The UK Should Support a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine. New Statesman, 25 February at www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk-politics/2022/02/tobias-ellwood-the-uk-must-support-a-no-fly-zone-over-ukraine.Google Scholar
Lancet (2019). The Politics of PHEIC. The Lancet, June 18 at www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(19)31406-0.pdf.Google Scholar
Lantis, Jeffrey S. and Wunderlich, Carmen (2018). Resiliency Dynamics of Norm Clusters: Norm Contestation and International Cooperation. Review of International Studies, 44 (3), 570–93.Google Scholar
Larsson, Oscar Leonard (2022). The Swedish Covid-19 Strategy and Voluntary Compliance: Failed Securitization or Constitutional Security Management? European Journal of International Security, 7 (2), 226–47.Google Scholar
Leander, Anna (2011). The Promises, Problems, and Potentials of a Bourdieu-Inspired Staging of International Relations. International Political Sociology, 5 (3), 294–313.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned (2012). ‘Tragedy, Politics and Political Science’ in Erskine, Toni and Ned Lebow, Richard eds., Tragedy and International Relations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 63–71.Google Scholar
Lechner, Silviya and Frost, Mervyn (2018). Practice Theory and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Kelley (2015). Revealing Power in Truth: Comment on ‘Knowledge, Moral Claims and the Exercise of Power in Global Health’. International Journal of Health Policy Management, 4 (4), 257–9.Google Scholar
Lee, Kelley and Piper, Julianne (2020). The WHO and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Less Reform, More Innovation. Global Governance, 26 (4), 524–33.Google Scholar
Levitt, Peggy and Merry, Sally (2009). Vernacularization on the Ground: Local Uses of Global Women’s Rights in Peru, India, China, and the US. Global Networks, 9 (4), 441–61.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. (1994). Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization 48 (2), 279–312.Google Scholar
Lewis, Simon and Maslin, Mark (2021). Five Things You Need to Know about the Glasgow Climate Pact. The Conversation, 13 November at https://theconversation.com/five-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-glasgow-climate-pact-171799.Google Scholar
Lieven, Anatol (2020). Climate Change and the Nation State: The Realist Case. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Light, Andrew (2017). ‘Climate Diplomacy’ in Mark Gardiner, Stephen and Thompson, Allen eds., The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics, New York: Oxford University Press, 487–500.Google Scholar
Light, Andrew and Katz, Eric, eds. (1996). Environmental Pragmatism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ling, L. H. M. and Nordin, Astrid H. M. (2019). On Relations and Relationality: A Conversation with Friends. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (5), 654–68.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew (1998). The Transformation of Political Community. Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Linsenmaier, Thomas, Schmidt, Dennis R. and Spandler, Kilian (2021). On the Meaning(s) of Norms: Ambiguity and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic World. Review of International Studies, 47 (4), 508–27.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter (2021 [1925]). The Phantom Public, United States: Wilder Publications.Google Scholar
Livingston, Alexander (2017). Between Means and Ends: Reconstructing Coercion in Dewey’s Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review, 111 (3), 522–34.Google Scholar
Livingston, James (2003). War and the Intellectuals: Bourne, Dewey, and the Fate of Pragmatism. The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, 2 (4), 431–50.Google Scholar
Luck Edward, C. (2019). Could a United Nations Code of Conduct Help Curb Atrocities? A Response to Bolarinwa Adediran. Ethics and International Affairs, 33 (1), 79–87.Google Scholar
Lynch, Cecilia (2020). ‘Friedrich Kratochwil: Prophet of Doubt?’ in Hellmann, Gunther and Steffek, Jens eds., Praxis as a Perspective on International Politics, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 33–50.Google Scholar
MacGilvray, Eric A. (2000). Five Myths about Pragmatism, or against a Second Pragmatic Acquiescence. Political Theory, 28 (4), 480–508.Google Scholar
Marchetti, Sarin (2015). Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marlier, Grant and Crawford, Neta C. (2013). Incomplete and Imperfect Institutionalisation of Empathy and Altruism in the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ Doctrine. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5 (4), 397–422.Google Scholar
McAfee, Noëlle (2004). Public Knowledge. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 30 (2), 139–57.Google Scholar
McCourt, David M. (2012). What’s at Stake in the Historical Turn? Theory, Practice, and Phronēsis in International Relations. Millennium. Journal of International Studies 41 (1), 23–42.Google Scholar
McCourt, David M. (2022). The New Constructivism in International Relations Theory, Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Matt (2021). Ecological Security: Climate Change and the Construction of Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGrath, Matt (2021). COP26: Fossil Fuel Industry Has Largest Delegation at Climate Summit. BBC News, 8 November at www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-59199484.Google Scholar
McLaren, Duncan and Corry, Olaf (2021). Clash of Geofutures and the Remaking of Planetary Order: Faultlines Underlying Conflicts over Geoengineering Governance. Global Policy, 12 (S1), 20–33.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. (2003). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. (2014). Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93 (5), 77–89.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. (2018). The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities, New Haven: Yale University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Menand, Louis (2002). The Metaphysical Club, London: Flamingo.Google Scholar
Mérand, Frédéric (2010). Pierre Bourdieu and the Birth of European Defense. Security Studies, 19 (2), 342–74.Google Scholar
Miller, David (2001). Distributing Responsibilities. Journal of Political Philosophy, 9 (3), 453–71.Google Scholar
Miller, Marjorie C. (2013). ‘Pragmatism and Feminism’ in Malachowski, Alan ed., The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231–48.Google Scholar
Minteer, Ben A. (2012). Refounding Environmental Ethics: Pragmatism, Principle and Practice, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl (2004). Making Disagreement Matter: Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 18 (1), 9–22.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer (2006). Ontological Security in World Politics. State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Security, 12 (3), 341–70.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer (2013). Power in Concert: The Nineteenth-Century Origins of Global Governance, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Molloy, Seán (2014). Pragmatism, Realism and the Ethics of Crisis and Transformation in International Relations. International Theory, 6 (3), 454–89.Google Scholar
Moolenaar, Ronald L., Cassell, Cynthia H., and Knight, Nancy W. (2020). Lessons Learned in Global Health Security Implementation. Health Security 18 (S1) at https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2019.0157.Google Scholar
Mor, Ben D. and Moaz, Zeev (1999). Learning and the Evolution of Enduring International Rivalries: A Strategic Approach. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 17 (1), 1–48.Google Scholar
Morgan, Patrick (2011). ‘The Practice of Deterrence’ in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent eds., International Practices, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 139–73.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1964). The Four Paradoxes of Nuclear Strategy. The American Political Science Review, 58 (1), 23–35.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1967 [1948]). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1974 [1946]). Scientific Man vs. Power Politics, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Justin (2015). The Responsibility to Protect and the Great Powers: The Tensions of Dual Responsibility. Global Responsibility to Protect, 7 (3–4), 398–421.Google Scholar
Morris, Justin and Wheeler, Nicholas J. (2016). ‘The Responsibility not to Veto: A Responsibility too Far?’ in Bellamy, Alex J. and Dunne, Tim eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 227–48.Google Scholar
Mullen, Lucia et al. (2020). An analysis of International Health Regulations Emergency Committees and Public Health Emergency of International Concern Designations. BMJ Global Health 5, 1–10 at https://gh.bmj.com/content/bmjgh/5/6/e002502.full.pdf.Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis (1926). The Golden Dawn. A Study in American Experience and Culture, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig N. (2018). ‘The Emergence of Global Governance’ in Weiss, Thomas G. and Wilkinson, Rorden eds., International Organization and Global Governance, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 25–36.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. (2013). ‘Humanitarianism, Responsibility or Rationality? Evaluating Intervention as State Strategy’ in Hehir, Aidan and Murray, Robert W. eds., Libya: The Responsibility to Protect and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention, New York: Palgrave, 15–33.Google Scholar
Muyumba, Walton M. (2009). The Shadow and the Act. Black Intellectual Practice, Jazz Improvisation, and Philosophical Pragmatism, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Naim, Moisés (2009). Minilateralism: The Magic Number to Get Real International Action. Foreign Policy, 173, 135–6.Google Scholar
Nair, Deepak (2019). Saving Face in Diplomacy: A Political Sociology of Face-to-face Interactions in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. European Journal of International Relations, 25 (3), 672–97.Google Scholar
Nance, Mark T. and Patrick Cottrell, M. (2014). A Turn Toward Experimentalism? Rethinking Security and Governance in the Twenty-first Century. Review of International Studies, 40 (2), 277–301.Google Scholar
Narayan, John (2016). John Dewey: The Global Public and Its Problems, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia (2011). The Concept of Practice in the English School. European Journal of International Relations, 17 (4), 611–30.Google Scholar
Negrón-Gonzales, Melinda and Contarino, Michael (2014). Local Norms Matter: Understanding National Responses to the Responsibility to Protect. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 20 (2), 255–76.Google Scholar
Neubert, Stefan (2008). ‘Dewey’s Pluralism Reconsidered. Pragmatist and Constructivist Perspectives on Diversity and Difference’ in Garrison, Jim ed., Reconstructing Democracy, Recontextualizing Dewey: Pragmatism and Interactive Constructivism in the Twenty-first Century, Albany: SUNY Press, Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. (2002a). Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 627–51.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. (2002b). The English School on Diplomacy. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. and Pouliot, Vincent (2011). Untimely Russia: Hysteresis in Russian–Western Relations over the Past Millennium. Security Studies, 20 (1), 105–37.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Carol (2013). ‘Education and the Pragmatic Temperament’ in Malachowski, Alan ed., The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 249–71.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold (1927). Does Civilization Need Religion? New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold (2001 [1932]). Moral Man and Immoral Society. A Study of Ethics and Politics, London: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Nordin, Astrid H. M. and Smith, Graham M. (2018). Reintroducing Friendship to International Relations: Relational Ontologies from China to the West. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 18 (3), 369–96.Google Scholar
Nordin, Astrid H. M. and Smith, Graham M. (2019). Relating Self and Other in Chinese and Western Thought. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (5), 636–53.Google Scholar
Nordin, Astrid H. M., et al. (2019). Towards Global Relational Theorizing: A Dialogue Between Sinophone and Anglophone Scholarship on Relationalism. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (5), 570–81.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. (2006). Education and Democratic Citizenship: Capabilities and Quality Education. Journal of Human Development, 7 (3), 385–95.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. (1987). Nuclear Learning and U.S.-Soviet Security Regimes. International Organization, 41 (3), 371–402.Google Scholar
Nyman, Jonna (2016). What Is the Value of Security? Contextualising the Negative/Positive Debate. Review of International Studies, 42 (5), 821–39.Google Scholar
Obergassel, Wolfgang, et al. (2021). Turning Point Glasgow? An Assessment of the Climate Conference COP26. Carbon and Climate Law Review, 15 (4), 271–81.Google Scholar
Orr, Shannon K. (2016). Institutional Control and Climate Change Activism at COP 21 in Paris. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (3), 23–30.Google Scholar
Owen, David (2002). Re-orienting International Relations: On Pragmatism, Pluralism and Practical Reasoning. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 653–73.Google Scholar
Pappas, Gregory Fernando (2012). What Would John Dewey Say about Deliberative Democracy and Democratic Experimentalism? Contemporary Pragmatism, 9 (2), 57–74.Google Scholar
Paterson, Matthew (2014). ‘Climate Re-Public: Practicing Public Space in Conditions of Extreme Complexity’ in Best, Jacqueline and Gheciu, Alexandra eds., The Return of the Public in Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–72.Google Scholar
Paul, Elisabeth, Brown, Garrett W. and Ridde, Valery (2020). COVID-19: Time for Paradigm Shift in the Nexus Between Local, National and Global Health. BMJ Global Health, (5), 1–4. https://gh.bmj.com/content/bmjgh/5/4/e002622.full.pdfGoogle Scholar
Peet, Jessica (2020). Eclecticism or Exclusivity? The (Critical) Pragmatist Ethos of (Intersectional) Analytic Eclecticism. International Journal, 75 (3), 420–32.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. (1877). The Fixation of Belief. Popular Science Monthly, November, 1–15 at http://peirce.org/writings/p107.html.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. (1878). How to Make Our Ideas Clear. Popular Science Monthly, January, 286–302 at https://courses.media.mit.edu/2004spring/mas966/Peirce%201878%20Make%20Ideas%20Clear.pdf.Google Scholar
Petrova, Margarita H. (2016). Rhetorical Entrapment and Normative Enticement: How the United Kingdom Turned from Spoiler into Champion of the Cluster Munition Ban. International Studies Quarterly, 60 (3), 387–99.Google Scholar
Plant, Tom and Harries, Matthew (2021). Going Ballistic: The UK’s Proposed Nuclear Build-up. Royal United Services Institute, 16 March at https://rusi.org/commentary/going-ballistic-uk-proposed-nuclear-build.Google Scholar
Podesta, John (2019). The Climate Crisis, Migration, and Refugees. 25 July at www.brookings.edu/research/the-climate-crisis-migration-and-refugees/.Google Scholar
Porter, Patrick (2020). The False Promise of Liberal Order. Nostalgia, Delusion and the Rise of Trump, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2008). The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities. International Organization, 62 (2), 257–88.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2010). International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2013). ‘Methodology’ in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca ed., Bourdieu in International Relations. London and New York: Routledge, 45–58.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2016a). International Pecking Orders. The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2016b). Hierarchy in Practice: Multilateral Diplomacy and Governance of International Security. European Journal of International Security, 1 (1), 5–26.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2021). Global Governance in the Age of Epistemic Authority. International Theory, 13 (1), 144–56.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. (2022). ‘Evolution in International Practices’ in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian and Hopf, Ted eds., Conceptualizing International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition, 170–90.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent and Cornut, Jérémie (2015). Practice Theory and the Study of Diplomacy: A Research Agenda. Cooperation and Conflict, 50 (3), 297–315.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent and Thérien, Jean-Philippe (2014). The Politics of Inclusion. Changing Patterns in the Governance of International Security. Review of International Studies, 41 (2), 211–37.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent and Thérien, Jean-Philippe (2018). Global Governance in Practice. Global Policy, 9 (2), 163–72.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard (2003). Law, Pragmatism and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Prantl, Jochen and Nakano, Ryoko (2011). Global Norm Diffusion in East Asia: How China and Japan Implement the Responsibility to Protect. International Relations, 25 (2), 204–23.Google Scholar
Pratt, Simon Frankel (2020). From Norms to Normative Configurations: A Pragmatist and Relational Approach to Theorizing Normativity in IR. International Theory, 12 (1), 59–82.Google Scholar
Pratt, Simon Frankel (2021). To be a Pragmatist in Explaining in International Politics. In Pratt, Simon Frankel Pratt et al. Forum. Pragmatism in IR: The Prospects of Substantive Theorizing. International Studies Review, 23 (4), 1933–8.Google Scholar
Price, Richard (1997). The Chemical Weapons Taboo, London and Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard (1998). Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization, 52 (3), 613–44.Google Scholar
Price, Richard ed. (2008a). Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard (2008b). ‘Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics’ in Price, Richard ed., Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–52.Google Scholar
Price, Richard (2008c). ‘Progress with a Price’ in Price, Richard ed., Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard (2008d). ‘The Ethics of Constructivism’ in Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 317–26.Google Scholar
Price, Richard (2008e). Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics. International Organization, 62 (2), 191–220.Google Scholar
Price, Richard M. (2012). On Pragmatic and Principled Limits and Possibilities of Dialogue. International Theory, 4 (3), 477–92.Google Scholar
Price, Richard and Reus-Smit, Christian (1998). Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations, 4 (3), 259–94.Google Scholar
Price, Richard and Sikkink, Kathryn (2021). International Norms, Moral Psychology, and Neuroscience (Elements in International Relations), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Propp, Daniel (2021). A Turning Point? COP26 and the Global Fight Against Climate Change. Columbia. SIPA Journal of International Affairs, December 31 online at https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/online-articles/turning-point-cop26-and-global-fight-against-climate-change.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1995). Pragmatism. An Open Question, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (2004). Ethics without Ontology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2016). A Relational Theory of World Politics. International Studies Review, 18 (1), 33–47.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2018). A Relational Theory of World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing and Nordin, Astrid H. M. (2019). Relationality and Rationality in Confucian and Western Traditions of Thought. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (5), 601–14.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason (2007). Defending the Society of States Why America Opposes the International Criminal Court and Its Vision of World Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason (2013). America’s War on Terror. The State of the American Exception from Bush to Obama, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason (2015). Symposium: International Criminal Justice and the Responsibility to Protect. Criminal Law Forum, 26 (1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason (2016). ‘The International Criminal Court’ in Bellamy, Alex and Dunne, Tim eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 259–94.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason (2018). What Should Be Done? Pragmatic Constructivist Ethics and the Responsibility to Protect. International Organization, 72 (1), 173–203.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason (2022). ‘Ukraine and the Responsibility to Protect: The Consequences for the Vulnerable (and the Not Yet Vulnerable) Should be Front and Centre of Our Reasoning’, Fresh Perspectives European Centre for the Responsibility to Protect 8 March at https://ecr2p.leeds.ac.uk/ukraine-and-the-responsibility-to-protect-the-consequences-for-the-vulnerable-and-the-not-yet-vulnerable-should-be-front-and-centre-of-our-reasoning/.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason (2023). ‘Norms, Normativity and Pragmatist Justification. Advancing the “Third Move” in Norm Studies’ in Orchard, Phil and Wiener, Antje eds., Contesting the World: Norm Research in Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason and Gallagher, Adrian (2015). Legitimacy Faultlines in International Society: The Responsibility to Protect and Prosecute After Libya. Review of International Studies, 41 (3), 553–73.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason and Souter, James (2015). A Special Responsibility to Protect: The UK, Australia and the Rise of Islamic State. International Affairs, 91 (4), 709–23.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason and Gifkins, Jess (2017). The Purpose of Security Council Practice. Contesting Competence Claims in the Normative Context Created by the Responsibility to Protect. European Journal of International Relations, 23 (3), 630–53.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason, Holland, Jack and Zhekova, Kalina (2017). Before the Vote: UK Foreign Policy Discourse on Syria 2011–13. Review of International Studies, 43 (5), 875–97.Google Scholar
Ralston, Shane J. ed. (2013). Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations. Essays for a Bold New World, New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Rath, Richard Cullen (1997). Echo and Narcissus: The Afrocentric Pragmatism of W. E. B. Du Bois. The Journal of American History, 84 (2), 461–95.Google Scholar
Ray, Larry (2004). Pragmatism and Critical Theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 7 (3), 307–21.Google Scholar
Reich, Kersten (2008). ‘Democracy and Education after Dewey – Pragmatist Implications for Constructivist Pedagogy’ in Garrison, Jim ed., Reconstructing Democracy, Recontextualizing Dewey: Pragmatism and Interactive Constructivism in the Twenty-first Century, Albany: SUNY Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Ren, Xiao (2020). Grown from within: Building a Chinese School of International Relations. The Pacific Review, 33 (3–4), 386–412.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian (2005). Liberal Hierarchy and the License to Use Force. Review of International Studies, 31 (S1), 71–92.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian (2008). ‘Constructivism and the Structure of Ethical Reasoning’ in Price, Richard ed., Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–82.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian (2013). Beyond Metatheory? European Journal of International Relations, 19 (3), 589–608.Google Scholar
Revkin, Andrew C. and Broder, John M. (2009). A Grudging Accord in Climate Talks. New York Times, 19 December at www.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/science/earth/20accord.html.Google Scholar
Rice, Daniel F. (1993). Reinhold Niebuhr and John Dewey. An American Odyssey, Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas (1994). Ideas Do Not Float Freely. Transnational Coalition, Domestic Structures and the End of the Cold War. International Organization, 48 (2), 185–214.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C. and Sikkink, Kathryn (1999). The Power of Human Rights. International Norms and Domestic Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas (2000). ‘Let’s Argue!’ Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54 (1) 1–39.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas (2004). Global Governance and Communicative Action. Government and Opposition, 39 (2), 288–313.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas (2018). ‘Arguing and Deliberation in International Relations’ in Bächtiger, Andre, Dryzek, John S., Mansbridge, Jane and Warren, Mark eds., The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 518–34.Google Scholar
Roff, Heather (2013). Global Justice, Kant and the Responsibility to Protect. A Provisional Study, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1993). ‘Human Rights, Rationality and Sentimentality’ in Shute, Stephen and Hurley, Susan L. eds., On Human Rights, New York: Basic Books, 111–34.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Rosen, Michael (2022). The COVID-19 Patent Waiver Compromise Finally Breaks Through (And Nobody’s Happy). American Enterprise Institute July 8 at www.aei.org/technology-and-innovation/the-covid-19-patent-waiver-compromise-finally-breaks-through-and-nobodys-happy/.Google Scholar
Rowling, Megan (2021). Climate ‘Loss and Damage’ Earns Recognition but Little Action in COP26 Deal. Reuters, 13 November at www.reuters.com/business/cop/climate-loss-damage-earns-recognition-little-action-cop26-deal-2021-11-13/.Google Scholar
Royer, Christof (2019). Fig Leaves, Paradoxes and Hollow Hopes – The Politics (and Antipolitics) of Protecting Human Rights. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 13 (4), 531–37.Google Scholar
Rubaii, Nadia, Wright, Stephanie and Prentice, Sarah (2021). Expanding the Ranks of Atrocity Prevention: Bringing a Prevention Lens to Professional Graduate Education. AIPG Sherri P. Rosenberg Policy Papers in Prevention and I-GMAP Mechanisms of Atrocity Prevention Report 2, https://orb.binghamton.edu/mechanisms-of-atrocity-prevention/2.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerrard (2004). Reconstituting the Global Public Domain: Issues, Actors, and Practices. European Journal of International Relations 10 (4), 499–531.Google Scholar
Rummel, R. J. (2017). Death by Government. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rushton, Simon (2015). The Politics of Researching Global Health Politics: Comment on ‘Knowledge, Moral Claims and the Exercise of Power in Global Health’. International Journal of Health Policy Management, 4 (5), 311–14.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, Jan (2019). The Next Great Hope: The Humanitarian Approach to Nuclear Weapons. Journal of International Political Theory, 15 (3), 386–400.Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila Nadya (2021). Pandemic Nationalism, Covid-19 and International Law. In Whitney Harris Institute, Global Governance: The World Health Organization and the Need for Post-COVID-19 Reform, 13–22 at www.ila-americanbranch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/White-Paper-COVID19-Global-Governance-FINAL-April-2021.pdf.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. and Waltz, Kenneth N. (2010). Is Nuclear Zero the Best Option? The National Interest 109, 88–96.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank (2001). The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization, 55 (1), 47–80.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Sebastian (2014). Foreign Military Presence and the Changing Practice of Sovereignty: A Pragmatist Explanation of Norm Change. American Political Science Review, 108 (4), 817–29.Google Scholar
Schindler, Sebastian and Wille, Tobias (2015). Change in and through Practice: Pierre Bourdieu, Vincent Pouliot, and the End of the Cold War. International Theory, 7 (2), 330–59.Google Scholar
Schindler, Sebastian and Wille, Tobias (2019). How Can We Criticize International Practices? International Studies Quarterly, 63 (4), 1014–24.Google Scholar
Schou Tjalve, Vibeke (2013). Realism, Pragmatism and the Public Sphere: Restraining Foreign Policy in an Age of Mass Politics. International Politics, 50 (6), 784–97.Google Scholar
Schouten, Peer (2013). ‘Security in Action. How John Dewey Can Help Us Follow the Production of Security Assemblages’ in Acuto, Michelle and Curtis, Simon eds., Reassembling International Theory. Assemblage Thinking and International Relations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Pivot, 83–90.Google Scholar
Security Council Report (2018). The Penholding System. Research Report, 21 December at www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Penholders.pdf.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock (1996). Pragmatism and Feminism. Reweaving the Social Fabric, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock (1999). Socializing Democracy: Jane Addams and John Dewey. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 29 (2), 207–30.Google Scholar
Sending, Ole Jacob and Neumann, Iver (2011). ‘Banking on Power: How Some Practices in an International Organization Anchor Others’ in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent eds., International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231–54.Google Scholar
Shalin, Dmitri (1992). Critical Theory and the Pragmatist Challenge. American Journal of Sociology, 98 (2), 237–79.Google Scholar
Shani, Giorgio (2008). Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory. International Studies Review, 10 (4), 722–34.Google Scholar
Shani, Giorgio and Chadha Behera, Navnita (2022). Provincialising International Relations Through a Reading of Dharma, Review of International Studies, 48 (5), 837–56.Google Scholar
Sharma, Serena. K (2016). ‘The 2007–2008 Post Election Crisis in Kenya: A Case of Escalation Prevention’ in Sharma, Serena K. and Welsh, Jennifer eds., The Responsibility to Prevent. Overcoming the Challenges of Atrocity Prevention, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 280–303.Google Scholar
Shaw, W. David (1986). The Poetics of Pragmatism: Robert Frost and William James. The New England Quarterly, 59 (2), 159–88.Google Scholar
Shields, Patricia M. and Soeters, Joseph (2013). ‘Pragmatism, Peacekeeping and the Constabulary Force’ in Ralston, Shane, ed., Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations, Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books, 87–110.Google Scholar
Shiffman, Jeremy (2014). Knowledge, Moral Claims and the Exercise of Power in Global Health. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 3 (6), 297–9.Google Scholar
Shih, Chih-yu. (2022). Role and Relation in Confucian IR: Relating to Strangers in the States of Nature. Review of International Studies, 48 (5), 910–29.Google Scholar
Sidhu, Waheguru Pal Singh (2016). ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction: Managing Proliferation’ in von Einsiedel, Sebastian, Malone, David M. and Stagno Ugarte, Bruno eds., The UN Security Council in the 21st Century, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 323–45.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn (2008). ‘The Role of Consequences, Comparison, and Counterfactuals in Constructivist Ethical Thought’ in Price, Richard ed., Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press, 83–111.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn (2013). ‘The United States and Torture: Does the Spiral Model Work?’ in Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn eds., The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 145–63.Google Scholar
Sil, Rudra (2009). Simplifying Pragmatism: From Social Theory to Problem-driven Eclecticism. International Studies Review, 11 (3), 648–52.Google Scholar
Sil, Rudra (2020). Analytic Eclecticism – Continuing the Conversation. International Journal, 75 (3), 433–43.Google Scholar
Sil, Rudra and Katzenstein, Peter (2010). Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms Across Research Traditions. Perspectives on Politics, 8 (2), 411–31.Google Scholar
Singh, Jaswant (1998). Against Nuclear Apartheid. Foreign Affairs, 77 (5), 41–52.Google Scholar
Sirur, Simrin (2021). What Is the Glasgow Climate Pact and Why India Did Not Commit to Coal Phase Out. The Print, 18 November at https://theprint.in/theprint-essential/what-is-the-glasgow-climate-pact-why-india-did-not-commit-to-coal-phase-out/767329/.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack (2020). Backlash against Naming and Shaming: The Politics of Status and Emotion. British Journal of Politics and International Studies, 22 (4), 644–53.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack (2022). Human Rights for Pragmatists, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Snyder, William M. and Wenger, Etienne (2004). ‘Our World as a Learning System: A Communities-of-Practice Approach’ in Conner, Marcia L. and Clawson, James G. eds., Creating a Learning Culture. Strategy, Technology and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 35–58.Google Scholar
Solomon, Ty and Steele, Brent J. (2017). Micro-Moves in International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 23 (2), 267–91.Google Scholar
Sondarjee, Maïka (2021). Collective Learning at the Boundaries of Communities of Practice: Inclusive Policymaking at the World Bank. Global Society, 35 (3), 307–26.Google Scholar
Sorrell, Kory (2014). Our Better Angels: Empathy, Sympathetic Reason, and Pragmatic Moral Progress. Pluralist, 9 (1), 66–86.Google Scholar
Spandler, Kilian and Söderbaum, Fredrik (2021). Populist (De)legitimation of International Organizations: From Procedural and Functional toward Representational Frames. Paper for presentation at the DVPW Convention, 14–16 September.Google Scholar
Spilman, Alice and Claeys, Suzanne (2022). How does the Worsening Security Environment Impact Nuclear Disarmament? Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 13 September at www.csis.org/analysis/how-does-worsening-security-environment-impact-nuclear-disarmament.Google Scholar
Srivastava, Swati (2013). Assembling International Organizations. Journal of International Organization Studies, 3 (1), 72–83.Google Scholar
Stappert, Nora (2020a). Practice Theory and Change in International Law: Theorizing the Development of Legal Meaning through the Interpretive Practices of International Criminal Courts. International Theory, 12 (1), 33–58.Google Scholar
Stappert, Nora (2020b). The Art of Aiming at a Moving Target: A Critique of Lechner and Frost’s Practice Theory and International Relations. Global Constitutionalism, 9 (1), 183–98.Google Scholar
Staunton, Denis (2021). What Has Happened in Glasgow Is Nothing Less Than a Reorientation of Global Capitalism towards a Carbon Neutral Future. Irish Times, 13 November at www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/cop26-everyone-looks-seven-years-older-than-they-did-at-the-beginning-1.4726797.Google Scholar
Staunton, Eglantine and Ralph, Jason (2020). The Responsibility to Protect Norm Cluster and the Challenge of Atrocity Prevention: An Analysis of the European Union’s Strategy in Myanmar. European Journal of International Relations, 26 (3), 660–86.Google Scholar
Stefan, Cristina G. (2017). On Non-Western Norm Shapers: Brazil and the Responsibility While Protecting. European Journal of International Security, 2 (1), 88–110.Google Scholar
Steffek, Jens (2022). ‘Praxis, Humanism and the Quest for Wholeness’ in Hellmann, Gunter and Steffek, Jens eds., Praxis as a Perspective on International Politics, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 255–72.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice Gross (1994). Political Learning by Doing: Gorbachev as Uncommitted Thinker and Motivated Learner. International Organization, 48 (2), 155–83.Google Scholar
Steinhilper, Elias (2015). From ‘the Rest’ to ‘the West’? Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the Western Bias in Norm Diffusion Research. International Studies Review, 17 (4), 536–55.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Hayley (2016). The Wisdom of the Many in Global Governance: An Epistemic-Democratic Defence of Diversity and Inclusion. International Studies Quarterly, 60 (1), 400–12.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Hayley (2021). Reforming Global Climate Governance in an Age of Bullshit. Globalizations, 18 (1), 86–102.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Hayley and Dryzek, John (2014). Democratizing Global Climate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine (1994). Empathetic Cooperation: A Feminist Method for IR. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 23 (2), 315–32.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. (2004). Democracy after Liberalism: Pragmatism and Deliberative Politics, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. (2007). A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tan, Sor-hoo (2021). ‘Intrinsic Values of Confucian Democracy and Dewey’s Pragmatist Method’ in Ames, Roger T., Chen, Yajun and Hershock, Peter D. eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism. Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 249–61.Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina (1999). The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use. International Organization, 53 (3), 433–68.Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina (2005). Stigmatizing the Bomb: Origins of the Nuclear Taboo. International Security, 29 (4), 5–49.Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina (2009). The Nuclear Taboo. The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons since 1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tesón, Fernando R. (2006). The Vexing Problems of Authority in Humanitarian Intervention: A Proposal. Wisconsin Journal of International Law, 24 (3), 761–72.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip (1991). ‘Learning in U.S. and Soviet Foreign Policy: In Search of an Elusive Concept’ in Breslauer, George W. and Tetlock, Philip E. eds., Learning in U.S. and Soviet Foreign Policy, Boulder: Westview Press, 20–61.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip (2005). Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh (2017). The Nuclear Ban Treaty: Recasting a Normative Framework for Disarmament. The Washington Quarterly, 40 (4), 71–95.Google Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh (2018). Nuclear Turbulence in the Age of Trump. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 29 (1), 105–28.Google Scholar
Thakur, Vineet and Smith, Karen (2021). Introduction to the Special Issue: The Multiple Births of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 47 (5), 571–9.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann and True, Jacqui (2018). A Century of International Relations Feminism: From World War I Women’s Peace Pragmatism to the Women, Peace and Security Agenda. International Studies Quarterly, 62 (2), 221–33.Google Scholar
Tooze, Adam (2021). The Cop26 Message? We Are Trusting Big Business, Not States, to Fix the Climate Crisis. The Guardian, 16 November at www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/nov/16/cop-26-big-business-climate-crisis-neoliberal.Google Scholar
Tracy, Abigail (2020). How Trump Gutted Obama’s Pandemic-Preparedness Systems. Vanity Fair, 1 May at www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/05/trump-obama-coronavirus-pandemic-response.Google Scholar
Trownsell, Tamara et al. (2021). Forum: Differing about Difference: Relational IR from around the World. International Studies Perspectives, 22 (1), 25–64.Google Scholar
UN (United Nations) (1999a). Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to General Assembly Resolution 53/35: The Fall of Srebrenica. 15 November at https://undocs.org/A/54/549.Google Scholar
UN (United Nations) (1999b). Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Actions of the United Nations during the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda. 15 December at https://reliefweb.int/report/rwanda/report-independent-inquiry-actions-united-nations-during-1994-genocide-rwanda.Google Scholar
UN (United Nations) (2000). Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations (Brahimi Report). 21 August at https://peacekeeping.un.org/sites/default/files/a_55_305_e_brahimi_report.pdf.Google Scholar
UN (United Nations) (2005). World Summit Outcome. General Assembly A/RES/60/1. 24 October at www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_60_1.pdf.Google Scholar
UN (United Nations) (2013). State Responsibility and Prevention Report of the Secretary-General A/67/929–S/2013/399 A/67/929–S/2013/399. 9 July at http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/SG%20report%202013(1).pdf.Google Scholar
UN (United Nations) (2014). Framework of Analysis for Atrocity Crimes: A Tool for Prevention. www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.49_Framework%20of%20Analysis%20for%20Atrocity%20Crimes_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
UNEP (United Nations Environment Report) (2021). Emissions Gap Report. 26 October at www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2021.Google Scholar
UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (2015) Paris Agreement at https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf.Google Scholar
US DoD (Department of Defense) (2018). Nuclear Posture Review at https://media.defense.gov/2018/Feb/02/2001872886/-1/-1/1/2018-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW-FINAL-REPORT.PDF.Google Scholar
US Mission Geneva (2020). US Explanation of Position. 19 May at https://geneva.usmission.gov/2020/05/19/explanation-of-position-covid-19-response-resolution/.Google Scholar
Vilmer, Jean-Baptiste Jeangène (2018). The Responsibility Not to Veto: A Genealogy. Global Governance, 24 (3), 331–49.Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, Armin and Villarreal, Pedro (2020). International Law on Pandemic Response: A First Stocktaking in Light of the Coronavirus Crisis. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL) Research Paper No. 2020-07, March 26 at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3561650.Google Scholar
Wagner, Caroline E. et al. (2021). Vaccine Nationalism and the Dynamics and Control of SARS-CoV-2. Science, 17 August at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34404735/.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen (2016). Obama Was Not a Realist President. Foreign Policy, 7 April.Google Scholar
Walters, William and D’aoust, Anne-Marie (2015). Bringing Publics into Critical Security Studies: Notes for a Research Strategy. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 44 (1), 45–68.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979). Theory of International Politics, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1981). The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better, Adelphi Papers 171.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1990). Nuclear Myths and Political Realities. The American Political Science Review, 84 (3), 731–45.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (2012). Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability. Foreign Affairs, 91 (4), 2–5.Google Scholar
Wang, Jessica Ching-Sze (2007). Dewey in China. To Teach and to Learn, Albany. SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Jonathan and Kommenda, Niko (2020). Coronavirus Pandemic Leading to Huge Drop in Air Pollution. The Guardian, 23 March at www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/mar/23/coronavirus-pandemic-leading-to-huge-drop-in-air-pollution.Google Scholar
Weber, Martin (2014). Between ‘Isses’ and ‘Oughts’: IR Constructivism, Critical Theory, and the Challenge of Political Philosophy. European Journal of International Relations, 20 (2), 516–43.Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G. (2016). ‘The Turbulent 1990s: R2P Precedents and Prospects’ in Bellamy, Alex and Dunne, Tim eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 56–74.Google Scholar
Welsh, Jennifer M. (2013). Norm Contestation and the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5 (4), 365–96.Google Scholar
Welsh, Jennifer M. (2019). Norm Robustness and the Responsibility to Protect. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4 (1), 53–72.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1992). Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46 (2), 391–425.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1999). Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne (2005). Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
West, Cornel (1989). The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
WHA (World Health Assembly) (2020). COVID-19 Response. Seventy-third World Health Assembly. 18 May at https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA73/A73_CONF1Rev1-en.pdf.Google Scholar
WHA (World Health Assembly) (2021). Director-General’s Closing Remarks at the World Health Assembly. 31 May at www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/director-general-s-closing-remarks-at-the-world-health-assembly---31-may-2021.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J. (2000). Saving Strangers. Humanitarian Intervention in International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J. (2009). Beyond Waltz’s Nuclear World: More Trust May be Better. International Relations, 23 (3), 428–45.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J. (2018). Trusting Enemies. Interpersonal Relationships in International Conflict, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whipps, Judy and Lake, Danielle (2017). ‘Pragmatist Feminism’ in Zalta, Edward N. ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy online at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/femapproach-pragmatism/.Google Scholar
Widmaier, Wesley (2004). Theory as a Factor and the Theorist as an Actor: The ‘Pragmatist Constructivist’ Lessons of John Dewey and John Kenneth Galbraith. International Studies Review, 6 (3), 427–45.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje (2004). Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics. European Journal of International Relations, 10 (2), 189–234.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje (2009). Enacting Meaning-in-use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations. Review of International Studies, 35 (1), 175–93.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje (2014). A Theory of Contestation, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje (2018). Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje (2022). ‘Practicing Academic Intervention. An Agonistic Reading of Praxis’ in Hellmann, Gunther and Steffek, Jens eds., Praxis as a Perspective on International Politics, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 215–33.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje and Puetter, Uwe (2009). Quality of Norms Is What Actors Make of It Critical – Constructivist Research on Norms. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 5 (1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. (2007). Culture and Security. Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winston, Carla (2018). Norm Structure, Diffusion, and Evolution: A Conceptual Approach. European Journal of International Relations, 24 (3), 638–61.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonas and Zimmerman, Lisbeth (2016). Between Banyans and Battle Scenes: Liberal Norms, Contestation, and the Limits of Critique. Review of International Studies, 42 (3), 513–34.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan (2017). Everything Must Be Measured: How Mimicking Business Taints Universities. The Guardian, 8 August at www.theguardian.com/education/2017/aug/08/business-taints-universities-research-teaching.Google Scholar
Wyn Jones, Richard (2005). ‘On Emancipation: Necessity, Capacity, and Concrete Utopias’ in Booth, Ken ed., Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 215–35.Google Scholar
Yang, Guorong (2021). ‘Confucianism and Pragmatism. The Intrinsic Philosophical Themes and Their Diverse Developments’ in Ames, Roger T., Chen, Yajun and Hershock, Peter D. eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism. Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 103–27.Google Scholar
Youde, Jeremy (2017). Global Health Governance in International Society. Global Governance, 23 (4), 583–600.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Lisbeth (2017). ‘Inter-National’ Habermas: Contestation and Understanding under Conditions of Diversity. Polity, 49 (1), 149–55.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael, (2018). A Theory of Global Governance. Authority, Legitimacy and Contestation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Jason Ralph, University of Leeds
  • Book: On Global Learning
  • Online publication: 07 September 2023
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Jason Ralph, University of Leeds
  • Book: On Global Learning
  • Online publication: 07 September 2023
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Jason Ralph, University of Leeds
  • Book: On Global Learning
  • Online publication: 07 September 2023
Available formats
×