Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:42:31.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 2 - Célimène v. Damien

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Ruth Sefton-Green
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Law, University of Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne)
Ruth Sefton-Green
Affiliation:
Université de Paris I
Get access

Summary

Case

Célimène, a venerable old lady, put up a sign outside her house near Giverny, advertising the ‘sale of attic contents’. Damien, an antiques dealer on his way to visit Monet's home, stopped to look and recognised one of the master's original works among the bric-a-brac. He bought it on the spot for twice the asking price, and then proceeded to resell it to the Louvre. What remedy, if any, is available?

Discussions

Austria

Célimène, who is no art expert, has made a mistake (as to the value of the painting, see Case 1) as to the content of the contract. The difference lies in the fact that only one party has made a mistake, whereas in Case 1 there was a common mistake. Damien, as an art expert, immediately recognises the artist. Damien is not worthy to be protected in accordance with § 870 and 871 ABGB. If § 871 ABGB accepts and recognises the fact that the mistake will have to be recognised by using proper alertness and due diligence in order to entitle the mistaken party to avoid or to adapt the contract, this is even more so if the mistake not only had to be recognised but in fact had been so recognised. Scholarly opinion accepts this analogy unanimously. Célimène has, therefore, the right to annul the contract on the ground that she would not have sold the painting at all if she had been aware of the artist and its real value, or the right to adapt the contract on the basis that she would have sold the painting in any case but at a different, namely higher, price.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Célimène v. Damien
  • Edited by Ruth Sefton-Green, Université de Paris I
  • Book: Mistake, Fraud and Duties to Inform in European Contract Law
  • Online publication: 06 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495052.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Célimène v. Damien
  • Edited by Ruth Sefton-Green, Université de Paris I
  • Book: Mistake, Fraud and Duties to Inform in European Contract Law
  • Online publication: 06 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495052.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Célimène v. Damien
  • Edited by Ruth Sefton-Green, Université de Paris I
  • Book: Mistake, Fraud and Duties to Inform in European Contract Law
  • Online publication: 06 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495052.007
Available formats
×