Book contents
- Metaphors in the Mind
- Metaphors in the Mind
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 ‘I Am Trying to Climb Everest in Flip-Flops.’
- 2 ‘Would You Prefer a Pencil or an Antiseptic Wipe?’
- 3 ‘I’m Running on This Soapy Conveyor Belt with People Throwing Wet Sponges at Me.’
- 4 ‘This One Sounds Like A Bell and This One Sounds Like When You’re Dead.’
- 5 ‘I Did Not Know Where I Started and Where I Ended.’
- 6 ‘Those Cookies Tasted of Regret and Rotting Flesh.’
- 7 ‘Things Come Out of My Mouth That Shouldn’t Be There.’
- 8 ‘This Is My Body Which Will Be Given Up for You.’
- 9 ‘Malodorous Blacksmiths and Lazy Livers.’
- 10 Conclusion
- Notes
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2019
Book contents
- Metaphors in the Mind
- Metaphors in the Mind
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 ‘I Am Trying to Climb Everest in Flip-Flops.’
- 2 ‘Would You Prefer a Pencil or an Antiseptic Wipe?’
- 3 ‘I’m Running on This Soapy Conveyor Belt with People Throwing Wet Sponges at Me.’
- 4 ‘This One Sounds Like A Bell and This One Sounds Like When You’re Dead.’
- 5 ‘I Did Not Know Where I Started and Where I Ended.’
- 6 ‘Those Cookies Tasted of Regret and Rotting Flesh.’
- 7 ‘Things Come Out of My Mouth That Shouldn’t Be There.’
- 8 ‘This Is My Body Which Will Be Given Up for You.’
- 9 ‘Malodorous Blacksmiths and Lazy Livers.’
- 10 Conclusion
- Notes
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Metaphors in the MindSources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor, pp. 229 - 265Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Ackerman, J., Nocera, C. and Bargh, J. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328, 1712–1715.Google Scholar
Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aikhenvald, A. and Storch, A. (2013). Linguistic perception of perception and cognition. In Aikenvald, A. and Storch, A. (eds.) Perception and Cognition in Language and Culture, Leiden: Brill, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Akpinar, E. and Berger, J. (2015). Drivers of cultural success: The case of sensory metaphors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109 (1), 20–34.Google Scholar
Alan, K. and Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alibali, M. W. and DiRusso, A. A. (1999). The function of gesture in learning to count: More than keeping track. Cognitive Development, 14, 37–56.Google Scholar
Alibali, M. W. and Nathan, M. J. (2007). Teachers’ gestures as a means of scaffolding students’ understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson. In Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B. and Derry, S. J. (eds.) Video Research in the Learning Sciences, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 349–365.Google Scholar
Alibali, M. W. and Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21 (2), 247–286.Google Scholar
Almohammadi, A. (2017). The development of metaphor comprehension in Arabic-speaking children. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Kings College London.Google Scholar
Anderson, S., Matlock, T. and Spivey, M. J. (2010). On the path to understanding the on-line processing of grammatical aspect. Spatial Cognition, 7, 139–151.Google Scholar
Andreano, J. and Cahill, L. (2009). Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and memory. Learning and Memory, 16, 248–266.Google Scholar
Andric, M. and Small, S. L. (2012). Gesture’s neural language. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 99.Google Scholar
Antle, A., Corness, G. and Droemeva, M. (2009). What the body knows: Exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital environments. Interacting with Computers, 21, 66–75.Google Scholar
Asperger, H. (1941). Education Issues within Children's Week (Vienna 1st to 7th September 1940). NERVENARZT, 14 (1), 28–31.Google Scholar
Avenanti, A., Candidi, M. and Urgesi, C. (2013). Vicarious motor activation during action perception: Beyond correlational evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 185.Google Scholar
Avanzini, P., Fabbri-Destro, M., Dalla Volta, R., Daprati, E., Rizzolatti, G. and Cantalupo, G. (2012). The dynamics of sensorimotor cortical oscillations during the observation of hand movements: An EEG study. PLoS ONE, 7 (5), e37534.Google Scholar
Aziz-Zadeh, L. and Damasio, A. (2008). Embodied semantics for actions: Findings from functional brain imaging. Journal of Physiology, 102 (1–3), 35–39.Google Scholar
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S. M., Rizzolatti, G. and Iacoboni, M. (2006). Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Issues in Biology, 16 (8), 1818–1823.Google Scholar
Bakker, S., Antle, A. N. and Van den Hoven, E. (2009). Identifying embodied metaphors in children’s sound-action mappings. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, Como, Italy, 140–149.Google Scholar
Banaji, M. E. and Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7 (3), 186–192.Google Scholar
Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y. and Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 136, 610–622.Google Scholar
Barchard, K. A., Grob, K. and Roe, M. J. (2017). Is sadness blue? The problem of using figurative language for emotions on psychological tests. Behavior Research Methods, 49 (2), 443–456.Google Scholar
Bardolph, M. and Coulson, S. (2014). How vertical hand movements impact brain activity elicited by literally and metaphorically-used words: An ERP study of embodied metaphor. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1031.Google Scholar
Bargh, J., Chen, M. and Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behaviour: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (2), 230–244.Google Scholar
Barnden, J. A., Glasbey, S. R., Lee, M. G. and Wallington, A. M. (2003). Domain-transcending mappings in a system for metaphorical reasoning. In Conference Companion to the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL’03).Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M. and Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21 (1), 37–46.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwight, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y. and Plumb, I. (2001). The ‘Reading the Mind’ test revised version: A study with normal adults, adults with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42 (2), 241–251.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2010). Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2 (4), 716–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, G. (1997). Disrupted Lives: How People Create Meaning in a Chaotic World, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benor, S. B. and Levy, R. (2006). The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language, 82, 233–278.Google Scholar
Bergen, B. (2012). Louder Than Words, The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bergen, B. and Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112, 150–158.Google Scholar
Bessenoff, G. R. and Sherman, J. W. (2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18 (4), 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsell, B. (2017). Creative metaphor production in a first and second language and the role of creativity. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Blackwell, P. M., Engen, E., Fischgrund, J. E. and Zarcadoolas, C. (1978). Sentences and Other Systems: A Language and Learning Curriculum for Hearing-Impaired Children, Washington, DC: The Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.Google Scholar
Blomberg, J. and Zlatev, J. (2014). Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomelogical Cognitive Science, 13 (3), 395–418.Google Scholar
Blomberg, J. and Zlatev, J. (2015). Non-actual motion: Phenomenological analysis and linguistic evidence. Cognitive Process, 16, S153–S157.Google Scholar
Boers, F. (1997a). Health, fitness and mobility in a free-market ideology. In van Noppen, J. P. and Maufort, M. (eds.) Voices of Power: Co-operation and Conflict in English Language and Literatures, Liège University Press, pp. 89–96.Google Scholar
Boers, F. (1997b). No pain, no gain in a free-market rhetoric: A test for cognitive semantics? Metaphor and Symbol, 12, 231–241.Google Scholar
Boers, F. (1999). When a bodily source domain becomes prominent: The joy of counting metaphors in the socio-economic domain. In Gibbs, R. and Steen, G. (eds.) Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 47–56.Google Scholar
Boers, F. and Littlemore, J. (2000). Cognitive style variables in participants’ explanations of conceptual metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 15 (3), 177–187.Google Scholar
Bohrn, I. C., Altman, U. and Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Looking at the brains behind figurative language – a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2669–2683.Google Scholar
Bohrne, I. C., Altann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W. and Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Old proverbs in new skins – an fMRI study on defamialiarization. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 204.Google Scholar
Bonda, E., Petrides, M., Frey, S. and Evans, A. (1994). Frontal cortex involvement in organized sequences of hand movements: Evidence from a positron emission topography study. Society for Neurosciences Abstracts, 20, 353.Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Glenberg, A. M. and Kaschal, M. P. (2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory and Cognition, 32, 863–873.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L., Fhurman, O. and McComick, K. (2011). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition, 118 (1), 123–129.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L., Ramscar, M. and Frank, M. C. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185–189.Google Scholar
Bosmans, A. (2006). Scents and sensibility: When do (in) congruent ambient scents influence product evaluations? Journal of Marketing, 70 (3), 32–43.Google Scholar
Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R. et al. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain, 117 (6), 1241–1253.Google Scholar
Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., and PulverMüller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1905–1914.Google Scholar
Bowdle, B.F. and Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor, Psychological Review, 112 , 193–216.Google Scholar
Bowes, A. and Katz, A. N. (2015). Metaphor creates intimacy and temporarily enhances theory of mind. Memory and Cognition, 43, 953–963.Google Scholar
Bråten, S. (2007). (Ed.) On Being Moved: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy, Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brdar, M., Strkalj Despot, K., Tonkovic, M., Brdar-Szabo, R. And Tomic, I. (2015). How heavy are things in Croation and elsewhere? A contrastive experimental study. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the International Cognitive Linguistics Association, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
Bremner, A., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., de Fockert, J., Linnell, K. and Spence, C. (2013). Bouba and Kiki in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches but different shape-taste matches to Westerners. Cognition, 126, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. In the CHILDES Corpus: https://talkbank.org/share/.Google Scholar
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C., Augustyn, J. S. and Taylor, H. (2009). When you and I share perspectives: Pronouns modulate perspective raking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science, 20 (1), 27–32.Google Scholar
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. and Taylor, H. (2011). Better you than I: Perspectives and emotion simulation during narrative comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23 (5), 659–666.Google Scholar
Buxbaum, L. and Saffran, E. (2002). Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain and Language, 82, 179–199.Google Scholar
Cacciari, C. and Glucksberg, S. (1994). Understanding Figurative Language. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (ed.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 447–477.Google Scholar
Cacciari, C., Bolonini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., Miniussi, C. and Papagno, C. (2011). Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language, 119, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. and Petty, R. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J, Petty, R., Feinstein, J., Jarvis, W. and Blair, G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in Need for Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 197–253.Google Scholar
Caers, E. (2006). When ministers were digging in for a fight. Metaphors of liberal common sense during the Winter of Discontent, 1978–1979. https://doclib.uhasselt.be/dspace/bitstream/1942/1672/1/whenministers.pdf.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (2008). From left to right … Coverbal gestures and their symbolic use of space. In Cienki, A. and Müller, C., (eds.) Metaphor and Gesture, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27–53.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society, 18 (2), 197–222.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Muncer, S. and Coyle, E. (1992). Social representation of aggression as an explanation of gender differences: A preliminary study. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 95–108.Google Scholar
Cannon, R., Schnall, S. and White, M. (2011). Transgressions and expressions: Affective facial muscle activity predicts moral judgments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2 (3), 325–331.Google Scholar
Cardillo, E. R., Watson, C. E., Schmidt, G., Kranjec, A. and Chatterjee, A. (2012). From novel to familiar: Tuning the brain for metaphors. Neuroimage, 59, 3212–3221.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2008). Who’s afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 58 (1), 63–79.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138 (3), 351–367.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2011). Different bodies, different minds: The body-specificity of language and thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20 (6), 378–383.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2014). Development of metaphorical thinking: The role of language. In Borkent, M., Hinnell, J. and Dancygier, B. (eds.) Language and the Creative Mind, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2016). Linguistic relativity. In Riemer, N. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Semantics, New York: Routledge, pp. 158–174.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2017). The hierarchical structure of mental metaphors. Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse, 46–61.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. and Boroditsky, L. (2003). Do we think about time in terms of space? In Alterman, R. and Kirsch, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 216–221.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. and Bottini, R. (2014). Mirror-reading can reverse the flow of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 473–479.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. and Chrysikou, E. (2011). When left is ‘right’: motor fluency shapes abstract concepts, Psychological Science, 22 (4), 419–422.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. and Dijkstra, K. (2010). Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition, 115, 179–185.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. and Gijssels, T. (2015). What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Linguistics Vanguard, 1 (1), 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. and Jasmin, K. (2010). Good and bad in the hands of politicians: Spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech. PLoS ONE, 5 (7), e11805. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011805.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., Boroditsky, L., Phillips, W., Greene, J., Goswami, S., Bocanegra-Thiel, T. et al., (2004). How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference Cognitive Science Society, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Chandler, J., Reinhard, D. and Schwarz, N. (2012). To judge a book by its weight you need to know its content: Knowledge moderates the use of embodied cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48 (4), 948–952.Google Scholar
Chang, C. T. and Yen, C. T. (2013). Missing ingredients in metaphor advertising: The right formula of metaphor type, product type, and need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 42 (1), 80–94.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2009). Metaphor and gender in British parliamentary debates. In Ahrens, K. (ed.) Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 139–165.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2012). Shattering the Bell jar: Metaphor, gender and depression. Metaphor and Symbol, 27 (3), 199–216.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2016). The “dull roar” and the “burning barbed wire pantyhose”: Complex metaphor in accounts of chronic pain. In Gibbs, R. (ed.). Mixing Metaphor, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 155–176.Google Scholar
Chen, J., Kacinik, N. A., Chen, Y. and Wu, N. (2014). Metaphorical color representations of emotional concepts in English and Chinese speakers: Evidence from behavioral data. Poster session presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology conference, Long Beach, CA.Google Scholar
Chiou, W. B. and Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). In broad daylight, we trust in God! Brightness, the salience of morality, and ethical behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 37–42.Google Scholar
Christi, M. and McGrath, M. (1987). Taking up the challenge of grief: Film as therapeutic metaphor and action ritual. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 8 (4), 193–199.Google Scholar
Chu, M. and Kita, S. (2011). The nature of gesture’s beneficial role in spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 706–723.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (1997). Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In Verspoor, M., Less, K. D. and Sweester, E. (eds.) Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (2008). Why study metaphor and gesture. In Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (eds.) Metaphor and Gesture, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 5–25.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (eds.) Metaphor and Gesture, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (2008a). Introduction. In Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (eds.) Metaphor and Gesture, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (2008b). Metaphor, gesture and thought. In Gibbs, R. W. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 483–501.Google Scholar
Cienki, A., Becker, R., Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A. and Iriskhanova1, O. (2016). Grammatical aspect, gesture, and mental simulation in Russian and French International Conference of the Cognitive Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Citron, F. M. and Goldberg, A. E. (2014a). Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 1–11.Google Scholar
Citron, F. M. and Goldberg, A. E. (2014b). Social context modulates the effect of hot temperature on perceived interpersonal warmth: A study of embodied metaphors. Language and Cognition, 6, 1–11.Google Scholar
Citron, F. M., Cacciari, C., Kucharski, M., Beck, L., Conrad, M. and Jacobs, A. (2015). When emotions are expressed figuratively: Psycholinguistic and affective norms of 619 idioms for German (PANIG). Behavioural Research Methods, 1–21.Google Scholar
Clark, K. B. and Clark, M. P. (1940). Skin color as a factor in racial identification of Negro preschool children. Journal of Social Psychology, S.P.SS.SI. Bulletin, II, 159–169.Google Scholar
Classen, C. (1990) Sweet colors, fragrant songs: Sensory models of the Andes and the Amazon. American Ethnologist, 17 (4), 722–735.Google Scholar
Coker, E. M. (2004). “Traveling pains”: Embodied metaphors of suffering among southern Sudanese refugees in Cairo. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 28 (1), 15–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cogan, J. C., Bhalla, S. K., Sefa-Dedeh, A. and Rothyblum, E. D. (1996). A comparative study of United States and African Students on Perceptions of Obesity and Thinness. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 27 (1), 98–113.Google Scholar
Cohen Kadosh, R. and Gertner, L. (2011). Synaesthesia: Gluing together time, number and space. In Dehaene, S. and Brannon, E (eds.) Space, Time and Number in the Brain, Searching for the Foundations of Mathematics Thought, Cambridge, MA: Elsevier, pp. 123–132.Google Scholar
Cohen Kadosh, R., Henik, A. and Walsh, V. (2007). Small is bright and big is dark in synaesthesia. Current Biology, 17, 834–835.Google Scholar
Connell, L. and Lynott, D. (2010). Look but don’t touch: Tactile disadvantage in processing modality-specific word. Cognition, 115, 1–9.Google Scholar
Cook, K. and Alfonso, R. (2015). Erotic metaphors jazz musicians play by, Paper presented at the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
Cornejo, C., Simonetti, F., Ibáñez, A., Aldunate, N., Ceric, F., López, V. and Núñez, R. E. (2009). Gesture and metaphor comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence of cross-modal coordination by audiovisual stimulation. Brain and Cognition, 70 (1), 42–52. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.12.005.Google Scholar
Corts, D. P. and Pollio, H. R. (1999). Spontaneous production of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol, 14 (2), 81–100.Google Scholar
Corts, D. P. and Meyers, K. (2002). Conceptual clusters in figurative language production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31 (4), 391–408.Google Scholar
Coslett, H. B. (1998). Evidence for disturbance of the body schema in neglect. Brain and Cognition, 37, 529–544.Google Scholar
Coslett, H. B., Saffran, E. M. and Schwoebel, J. (2002). Knowledge of the human body: A distinct semantic domain. Neurology, 59, 357–363.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Foucart, A., Hayakawa, S., Aparici, M., Apesteguia, J., Heafner, J. et al. (2014). Your morals depend on language. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94842. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094842.Google Scholar
Crawford, E. L., Margolies, S., Drake, J. and Murphy, M. (2006). Affect biases memory of location: Evidence for the spatial representation of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 1153–1169.Google Scholar
Cuccio, V. (2017). Body-schema and body-image: What are they and what is their role in embodied metaphor processing? In Hampe, B. and Steen, G. (eds.) Metaphor: From Embodied Cognition to Discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 82–98.Google Scholar
Cytowic, R. E. (1989). Synaesthesia: A Union of the Senses, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Dailey, A., Martindale, C. and Borkum, J. (2010). Creativity, synesthesia, and physiognomic Perception. Creativity Research Journal, 10 (1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Daniel, A. C. (2010). Immorality-blackness associations and the moral-purity metaphor in African Americans, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Tennessee State University.Google Scholar
Davidson, L., Sells, D., Sangster, S. and O’Connell, M. (2004). Qualitative studies of recovery: What can we learn from the person? In Ralph, R. O. and Corrigan, P. W. (eds.) Recovery in Mental Illness: Broadening our Understanding of Wellness, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 147–170.Google Scholar
Deamer, F. (2013). An investigation into the processes and mechanisms underlying the comprehension of metaphor and hyperbole, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
De Beauvoir, Simone (1949). The Second Sex, trans. (2009), Borde, Constance and Malovany-Chevallier, Sheila. Random House: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, S., Willemsa, R. M., Rueschemeyera, S. A., Lemhöfera, K. and Schriefersa, H. (2014). Embodied language in first- and second-language speakers: Neural correlates of processing motor verbs. Neuropsychologia, 56 , 334–349.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. and Brannon, E. (eds.) (2011). Space, Time and Number in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S. and Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.Google Scholar
Deignan, A., Littlemore, J. and Semino, E. (2013). Figurative Language, Genre and Register, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deroy, O., Crisnel, A-S. and Spence, C. (2013). Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: Odors, musical notes and geometrical shapes. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 20, 878–896.Google Scholar
Desai, R., Binder, J., Conant, L., Mano, Q. and Seidenberg, M. (2011). The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2376–2386.Google Scholar
De Sousa, H. (2012). Generational differences in the orientation of time in Cantonese speakers as a function of changes in the direction of Chinese writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–8.Google Scholar
Despot, K. (2017). The production of metaphor by patients with Schizophrenia, Paper presented at the RaAM specialised Seminar, Odense, Denmark.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, K., Kaschak, M. and Zwaan, R. (2007). Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognition, 102, 139–149.Google Scholar
Di Paulo, E. (2009). Editorial: The social and enactive mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8 (4), 409–415.Google Scholar
Dolcos, F., LaBar, K. S. and Cabeza, R. (2005). Remembering one year later: Role of the amygdala and the medial temporal lobe memory system in retrieving emotional memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 2626–2631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolscheid, S., Hunnius, D., Casasanto, D. and Majid, A. (2012). The sound of thickness: Prelinguistic infants’ associations of space and pitch. Cognitive Science, 2012: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, N. Miyake, D. Peeples and R. P. Cooper (eds.) Austin, Tx: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 306–311.Google Scholar
Dolscheid, S., Shayan, S., Majid, A. and Casasanto, D. (2013). The thickness of musical pitch: Psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity. Psychological Science, 24 (5), 613–621.Google Scholar
Domes, G., Heintrichs, M., Michel, A., Berger, C. and Herpertz, S. (2007). Oxytocin improves ‘mind reading’ in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 731–733.Google Scholar
Droit-Volet, S., Brunot, S. and Niedenthal, P. (2004). Perception of the duration of emotional events. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 849–858.Google Scholar
Dryll, E. (2009). Changes in metaphor comprehension in children. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 40, 204–212.Google Scholar
Dudschig, C., de la Vega, I. and Kaup, B. (2014). Embodiment and second-language: Automatic activation of motor responses during processing spatially associated L2 words and emotion L2 words in a vertical Stroop paradigm. Brain and Language, 132, 14–21.Google Scholar
Duffy, S. E. (2014). The role of cultural artefacts in the interpretation of metaphorical expressions about time. Metaphor and Symbol, 29 (2), 94–112.Google Scholar
Duffy, S. E. and Feist, M. I. (2014). Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time. Cognitive Linguistics, 25 (1), 29–54.Google Scholar
Duffy, S. E., Feist, M. I. and McCarthy, S. (2014). Moving through time: The role of personality in three real life contexts. Cognitive Science, 1662–1674.Google Scholar
Duffy, S., Littlemore, J., Heritage, F. and Winter, B. (in prep.). Gender and the social hierarchy.Google Scholar
Dunn, R. and Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching Secondary Students through Their Learning Styles, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W. and Diekman, A. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similaritries: A current appraisal. In Eckes, T. and Trautner, M. (eds.) The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 123–173.Google Scholar
Earp, B., Everett, J., Madva, E. and Hamlin, J. (2014). Out, damned spot: Can the ‘Macbeth effect’ be replicated? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36 (1), 91.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). On Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology, New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6 (3/4), 169–200.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. and Friesen, W. V. (1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164, 86–88.Google Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2009). Metaphor in political cartoons, exploring audience responses. In Forceville, C. (ed.) Multimodal Metaphor, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 173–196.Google Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2014). Appearances and dis/dys-appearances: A dynamic view of embodiment in Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Metaphor and the Social World, 4 (1), 109–125.Google Scholar
Enkell, H. (2002). Metaphor and the psychodynamic functions of the mind, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Kuopio, Finland, Kuopion Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. L. and Gamlin, P. J. ((1994). Young children’s comprehension of simple and complex metaphors presented in pictures and words. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9, 179–191.Google Scholar
Fainsilber, L. and Ortony, A. (1987). Metaphorical uses of language in the experience of emotions. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2, 239–250.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2008). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Faust, M. and Kenett, Y. N. (2014). Rigidity, chaos and integration: Hemispheric interaction and individuals differences in metaphor comprehension. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 511.Google Scholar
Fedden, S. and Boroditsky, L. (2012). Spatialization of time in Mian. Frontiers of Psychology, 3 (485), 1–10.Google Scholar
Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.Google Scholar
Feist, M. and Duffy, S. (2015). Moving beyond ‘Next Wednesday’: The interplay of lexical semantics and constructional meaning in an ambiguous metaphoric statement. Cognitive Linguistics, 26 (4), 633–656.Google Scholar
Feldman, J. and Narayanan, S. (2004). Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89, 385–392.Google Scholar
Fetterman, A., Robinson, M. and Meier, B. (2012). Anger as “seeing red”: Evidence for a perceptual association. Cognition & Emotion, 26 (8), 1445–1458.Google Scholar
Figueras Bates, C. (2015). I am a waste of breath, of space, of time: Metaphors of self in a pro-anorexia group. Qualitative Health Research, 25 (2), 189–204.Google Scholar
Foolen, A., Ludtke, U., Racine, T. P. and Zlatev, J. (eds.) (2012). Moving Ourselves and Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language, Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. and Urios-Aparisi, E. (eds.) (2009). Multimodal metaphor, Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Foroni, F. (2015). Do we embody second language? Evidence for ‘partial’ simulation during processing of a second language. Brain and Cognition, 99, 8–16.Google Scholar
Foroni, F. and Semin, G. R. (2013). Comprehension of action negation involves inhibitory simulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E. and Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108 (3), 819–824.Google Scholar
Frieze, I. H., Olson, J. E. and Good, D. C. (1990). Perceived and actual discrimination in the salaries of male and female managers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 46–67.Google Scholar
Fuhrman, O. and Boroditsky, L. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from a non-linguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34, 1430–1451.Google Scholar
Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H., Shu, D., Mao, S. and Boroditsky, L. (2011). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35, 1305–1328.Google Scholar
Fuller, D., Littlemore, J., McGuinness, S., Turner, S., Kuberska, K., and Burgess, M. (2016–2018). ‘Death before Birth: Understanding, informing and supporting choices made by people who have experienced miscarriage, termination and stillbirth’ ESRC-funded project: ES/N008359/1, https://deathbeforebirthproject.org/.Google Scholar
Fussell, S. R. and Moss, M. M. (1998). Figurative language in emotional communication. Human Computer Interaction Institute, 82, 113–141.Google Scholar
Gallagher, H. L., Happe, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U. and Frith, P. C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartons and stories: An fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38 (1), 11–21.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2008). Understanding others: Embodied social cognition. In Calvo, P. and Gomila, A. (eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 439–452.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2001). The shard manifold hypothesis: From mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 33–50.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2006). Intentional attunement: A neurophysiological perspective on social cognition and its disruption in autism. Brain Research, 1079, 15–24.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. and Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 439–450.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. and Lakoff, G. (2005). The Brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22 (3), 455–479.Google Scholar
Gamez, E., Diaz, J. and Marrero, H. (2011). The uncertain universality of the Macbeth effect with a Spanish sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14 (1), 156–162.Google Scholar
Gamez-Djokic, V., Narayanan, S., Wehlong, E., Sheng, T., Bergen, B., Davis, J. and Aziz-Zadeh, L. (under review). Morally queasy: metaphors implying moral disgust activate specific subregions of the insula and basal ganglia.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., Kircher, M., Winner, E. and Perkins, D. (1975). Children’s metaphoric productions and preferences, Journal of Child Language, 2 (1), 125–141.Google Scholar
Gentilucci, M. and Volta, R. D. (2008). Spoken language and arm gestures are controlled by the same motor control system. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61 (6), 944–957.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development, 59, 47–59.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4, 145–166.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2001). Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 16 (3 & 4), 317–333.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2002). Embodied metaphor in women’s narratives about their experiences with cancer. Health Communication, 14 (2), 139–165.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2005). The psychological status of image schemas. In Hampe, B. (ed.) From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 113–136.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006a). Embodiment and Cognitive Science, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006b). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language, 21, 434–458.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2008). Metaphor and thought: The state-of-the-art. In Gibbs, R. (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48 (8), 529–562.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2012). Walking the walk while thinking about the talk: Embodied interpretation of metaphorical narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42 (4), 363–378.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2013). Why do some people dislike conceptual metaphor theory? Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5 (102), 14–36.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2015). Embodied metaphor. In Littlemore, J. and Taylor, J. (eds.) The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, London: Bloomsbury, 167–184.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor Wars, Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. and Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. and Franks, H. (2002). Embodied metaphors in womens’ narratives about their experiences with cancer. Health Communication, 14, 139–165.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. and Perlman, M. (2010). Language understanding is grounded in experiential simulations: A reply to Weiskopf. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 41, 305–308.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W, Costa Lima, P. and Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1189–1210.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W, Gould, J. and Andric, M. (2006). Imagining metaphorical actions: Embodied simulations make the impossible plausible. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 25, 221–238.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Bogdanovich, J. M., Sykes, J. R. and Barr, D. J. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 141–154.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances. In Shaw, R. E. and Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Giessner, S. and Schubert, T. (2007). High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders’ power are interrelated. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 104, 30–44.Google Scholar
Gil, S., Niedenthal, P. M. and Droit-Volet, S. (2007). Anger and time perception in children. Emotion, 7, 219–225.Google Scholar
Gillberg, C. (2002). A guide to Asperger syndrome, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N. and Zur, A. (2004). Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor and Symbol, 19, 115–141.Google Scholar
Gkiouzepas, L. (2013). Is your ad headline high enough? The influence of orientational metaphors on affect and comprehension for print advertisements. The 12th International Conference on Research in Advertising (ICORIA), Zagreb, Croatia: European Academy of Advertising.Google Scholar
Gkiouzepas, L. (2015). Metaphor-ad layout consistency effects: The moderating role of personality traits. In Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. V), Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. (1999). Why mental models must be embodied. In Advances in Psychology (Vol. 128) North-Holland, pp. 77–90.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. and Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 9, 558–565.Google Scholar
Gold, R. and Faust, M. (2010). Right hemisphere dysfunction and metaphor comprehension in young adults with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autistic Developmental Disorders, 40, 800–811.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.Google Scholar
Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A. and Schneider, W. (2006). Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 4917–4921.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing Gesture: How our Hands Help us Think, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. and Wagner, S. M. (2005). How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 234–241.Google Scholar
Goldinger, S., Papesh, M., Barnhart, A., Hansen, W. and Hout, M. (2016). The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23 (4), 959–978.Google Scholar
González, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., Pulvermueller, F., Meseguer, V., Sanjuan, A., Belloch, V. et al. (2006). Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. Neuroimage, 32, 906–912.Google Scholar
González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, Á., Sierra, A. C., Ferriz, R. and Haggerd, M. S. (2016). Understanding the need for novelty from the perspective of self-determination theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 159–169.Google Scholar
Gori, M. (2015). Multisensory integration and calibration in children and adults with and without sensory and motor disabilities. Multisensory Research, 28, 71–99.Google Scholar
Grady, J. E. (1997a). Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary stress, PhD Dissertation, University of Berkeley. Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3g9427m2#page-1.Google Scholar
Grady, J. E. (1997b). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (4), 267–290.Google Scholar
Grady, J. E. (2007). Metaphor. In Geeraerts, D. and Cuyckens, H. (eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford University Press, pp. 188–213.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A., McGhee, D. and Schwartz, J. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (1998). Gesture as a Communication Strategy in Second Language Discourse: A Study of Learners of French and Swedish, Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (1999). Communication strategies, gesture and grammar. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère, 2, 61–71.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2006). Handling discourse: Gestures, reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2. Language Learning, 56, 155–196.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. and McCafferty, S. (2008). Introduction to gesture and SLA: Toward an integrated approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 133–146.Google Scholar
Hains, A. (2014). Metaphor comprehension in the treatment of people with schizophrenia, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A., Hasan, R. and Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Text and Context. Victoria: Derkin University.Google Scholar
Happé, F. (1991). The autobiographical writings of three Asperger syndrome adults: Problems of interpretation and implications for theory. In Frith, U. (ed.) Autism and Asperger syndrome, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 207–242.Google Scholar
Happé, F. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–119.Google Scholar
Happé, F. (1995). Understanding minds and metaphors: Insight from the study of figurative language in autism. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 275–295.Google Scholar
Happé, F. and Frith, U. (2009). The beautiful otherness of the autistic mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rstb.2009.0009.Google Scholar
Happé, F. and Vital, P. (2009). What aspects of autism predispose to talent? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364 (1522), 1369–1375.Google Scholar
Hardin, C. L. and Maffi, L. (1997). Color Categories in Thought and Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 25–54.Google Scholar
Hartman, J. and Paradis, C. (2018). Emotive and sensory simulation through comparative construal. Metaphor and Symbol, 33 (2), 1–21.Google Scholar
Hartmann, M., Martarelli, C., Mast, F. and Stocker, K. (2014). Eye movements during mental time travel follow a diagonal line. Consciousness and Cognition, 30, 201–209.Google Scholar
Hasson, U. and Glucksberg, S. (2004). Does understanding negation entail affirmation? An examination of negated metaphors. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. and PulverMüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.Google Scholar
Havas, D., Glenberg, A. and Rinck, M. (2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin, and Review, 14 (3), 191–201.Google Scholar
Hellmann, J. H., Thoben, D. F. and Echterhoff, G. (2013). The sweet taste of revenge: Gustatory experience induces metaphor-consistent judgments of a harmful act. Social Cognition, 31 (5), 531–542.Google Scholar
Hensley, W. E. and Angoli, M., (1980). Message, valence, familiarity, sex and personality effects on the perceptual distortion of height. Journal of Psychology, 104, 149–156.Google Scholar
Herz, R. S. (2004). A naturalistic analysis of autobiographical memories triggered by olfactory visual and auditory stimuli. Chemical Senses, 29 (3), 217–224.Google Scholar
Hodder, A. and Houghton, D. (2014). Linguistic markers of Tweets: Giving unions a voice, Seminar presented at the University of Birmingham English Language Research Seminar Series, October, 2014.Google Scholar
Holle, H., Obleser, J., Rueschemeyer, S. A. and Gunter, T. C. (2010). Integration of iconic gestures and speech in left superior temporal areas boosts speech comprehension under adverse listening conditions. Neuroimage, 49, 875–884.Google Scholar
Holle, H., Gunter, T. C., Rüschemeyer, S. A., Hennenlotter, A. and Iacoboni, M. (2008). Neural correlates of the processing of co-speech gestures. Neuroimage, 39, 2010–2024.Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., Junn, E. N. and Billman, D. (1984). Development of analogical problem-solving skill. Child Development, 55, 2042–2055.Google Scholar
Horstmann, G. and Ansorge, U. (2011). Compatibility between tones, head movements, and facial expressions. Emotion, 11, 975–980.Google Scholar
Horton, W. S. (2007). Metaphor and readers’ attributions of intimacy. Memory and Cognition, 35 (1), 87–94.Google Scholar
Horton, W. S. (2013). Character intimacy influences the processing of metaphoric utterances during narrative comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 28, 148–166.Google Scholar
Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137 (2), 297–315.Google Scholar
Hostetter, A. B. and Alibali, M. (2007). Raise your hand if you’re spatial: Relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production. Gesture, 7 (1), 73–95.Google Scholar
Hostetter, A. B. and Alibali, M. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15 (3), 495–514.Google Scholar
Hostetter, A. B. and Alibali, M. (2010). Language, gesture, action! A test of the Gesture as Simulated Action framework. Journal of Memory and Language, 63 (2), 245–257.Google Scholar
Houghton, D. and Littlemore, J. (in prep.). The role played by figurative messaging and emotion in viral videos.Google Scholar
Howe, J. (2007). Argument is argument: An essay on conceptual metaphor and verbal dispute. Metaphor and Symbol, 23 (1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Howes, D. and Classen, C. (1991). Sounding sensory profiles. In Howes, D. (ed.) The Varieties of Sensory Experience: A Sourcebook in the Anthropology of the Senses, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 257–288.Google Scholar
Huette, S., Winter, B., Matlock, T., Ardell, D. H. and Spivey, M. (2014). Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–7.Google Scholar
Hupka, R., Zalaski, Z., Otto, J., Reidl, L. and Tarabrina, N. (1997). The colors of anger, envy, fear and jealousy, a cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28 (2), 156–171.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555–1577.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, S. and Louwerse, M. (2013). Language statistics and individual differences in processing primary metaphors. Cognitive Linguistics, 24 (4), 667–687.Google Scholar
Hurtienne, J. (2011). Image Schemas and Design for Intuitive Use. Exploring New Guidance for User Interface Design. PhD Dissertation; http://opus.kobv.de/tuberlin/volltexte/2011/2970/pdf/hurtienne_joern.pdf.Google Scholar
Hurtienne, J. (2014). Non-linguistic applications of cognitive linguistics: On the usefulness of image-schematic metaphors in user interface design. In Littlemore, J. and Taylor, J. (eds.) The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 301–324.Google Scholar
Hurtienne, J., Stößel, C., Sturm, C., Maus, A., Rötting, M., Longdin, P. and Clarkson, J. (2010). Physical gestures for abstract concepts: Inclusive design with primary metaphors. Interacting with Computers, 22 (6), 475–484.Google Scholar
Hussey, K. and Katz, A. N. (2006). Metaphor production in online conversation: Gender and friendship status. Discourse Processes, 42 (1), 75–98.Google Scholar
Hussey, K. and Katz, A. N. (2009). Perception of the use of metaphor by an interlocutor in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 203–236.Google Scholar
Ibáñez, A., Manes, F., Escobar, J., Trujillo, N., Andreucci, P. and Hurtado, E. (2010). Gesture influences the processing of figurative language in non-native speakers: ERP evidence. Neuroscience Letters, 471 (1), 48–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.009.Google Scholar
Ibáñez, A., Toro, P., Cornejo, C., Urquina, H., Manes, F., Weisbrod, M. and Schroder, J. (2011). High contextual sensitivity of metaphorical expressions and gesture blending: A video event-related potential design. Psychiatry Research, 191 (1), 68–75. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.008.Google Scholar
Ibarretze-Antuñano, I. (2008). Guts, heart and liver: The conceptualization of internal organs in Basque. In Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Ning, Y. and Niemeier, S. (eds.) Culture, Body, and Language: Conceptualizations of Internal Body Organs across Cultures and Languages, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 103–128.Google Scholar
Inagi, K. and Hatano, G. (1987). Young children’s spontaneous personification as analogy. Child Development, 58, 1013–1020.Google Scholar
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., and Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 714–725.Google Scholar
Ishihara, M., Keller, P., Rossetti, Y. and Prinz, W. (2008). Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex, 44 (4), 454–461.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (2001). The resilience of gesture in talk: Gesture in blind speakers and listeners. Developmental Science, 4, 416–422.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A., Võ, M., Briesemeister, B., Conrad, M., Hofmann, M., Kuchinke, L., Lüdtke, J. and Braun, M. (2015). 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: What are the echoes? Frontiers in Psychology, 1 (8).Google Scholar
Jamalian, A. and Tversky, B. (2012). Gestures alter thinking about time. In Miyake, N., Peebles, D. and Cooper, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 503–508.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2003). Probing the effects of the L2 on the L1: A case study. In Cook, V. J. (ed.) Second Language Acquisition, 3: Effects of the Second Language on the First, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Limited.Google Scholar
Jensen, T. (2013). New perspectives on language, cognition and values. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 9 (1), 71–78.Google Scholar
Jensen, T. (2014). Emotion in languaging: An ecological approach to the intertwined nature of language and emotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 720.Google Scholar
Jensen, T. and Cuffari, E. (2014). Doubleness in experience: Toward a distributed enactive approach to metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol, 29, 278–297.Google Scholar
Johansson-Falck, M. (2010). Review of Müller (2008) Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking (University of Chicago Press). Metaphor and Symbol, 25, 114–121.Google Scholar
Johansson-Falck, M. and Gibbs, R. (2012). Embodied motivations for metaphorical meanings. Cognitive Linguistics, 23 (2), 251–272.Google Scholar
John, O. P. and Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2 (1999), 102–138.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. 1997. Metaphor vs. Conflation in the Acquisition of Polysemy: The Case of See. In Hiraga, M. K., Sinha, C. and Wilcox, S. (eds.) Cultural, Typological and Psychological Perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics, Albuquerque, NM: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (2007). The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding, Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. and Larson, S. (2003). “Something in the way she moves” – Metaphors of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 18 (2), 63–84.Google Scholar
Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D. and Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20 (9), 1169–1174.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A. and Cable, D. M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (3), 428–441.Google Scholar
Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (11), 512–518.Google Scholar
Jütte, R. (2005). A History of the Senses: From Antiquity to Cyberspace, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), 193.Google Scholar
Kaneko, M. and Sutton-Spence, R. (2016). In Semino, E. and Demjen, Z. (eds.) Metaphor in Sign Language, The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language, London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 263–279.Google Scholar
Kanner, L. (1946). Irrelevant and metaphorical language in early infantile autism. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 103 (2): 242–246.Google Scholar
Karns, C. M. and Knight, R. T. (2009). Intermodal auditory, visual, and tactile attention modulates early stages of neural processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 6690–6683.Google Scholar
Kasirer, A. and Mashal, N. (2014). Verbal creativity in autism: Comprehension and generation of metaphoric language in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder and typical development. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 615.Google Scholar
Katz, A. N. (1983). What does it mean to be a high imager? In Yuille, J. C. (ed.) Imagery, Memory and Cognition, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 39–63.Google Scholar
Katz, A. N. and Bowes, A. (2015). Embodiment in metaphor and (not?) in bilingual language. In Heredia, R. R. and Cieślicka, A. B. (eds.) Bilingual Figurative Language Processing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaup, B. (2001). Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information. Memory and Cognition, 29, 860–967.Google Scholar
Kaup, B. and Zwaan, R. A. (2003). Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 439–446.Google Scholar
Kaup, B., Yaxley, R. H., Madden, C. J., Zwaan, R. A. and Lüdtke, J. (2007). Experiential simulations of negated text information. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60 (7), 976–990.Google Scholar
Kay, A. C., Wheeler, S. C., Bargh, J. A. and Ross, L. (2004). Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioural choice. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 95, 83–96.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kensinger, E. and Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory and Cognition, 31, 1169–1180.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. R. (1988). Style, strategy and skill in reading. In Schmeck, R. (ed.) Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 230–274.Google Scholar
Kircher, T., Straube, B., Leube, D. et al. (2009). Neural interaction of speech and gesture: Differential activations of metaphoric co-verbal gestures. Neuropsychologia, 47, 169–179.Google Scholar
Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In McNeill, D.. (ed.) Language and Gesture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 162–185.Google Scholar
Kita, S., Alibali, M. W. and Chu, M. (2017). How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis. Psychological Review, 124 (3), 245–266.Google Scholar
Kitayana, O. (1987). Metaphorization – Making terms. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 68 (4), 499–509.Google Scholar
Knapton, O. (2013). Pro-anorexia: Extensions of ingrained concepts. Discourse & Society, 24 (4), 461–477.Google Scholar
Kogan, N., Connor, K., Gross, A. and Fava, D. (1980). Understanding visual metaphor: Developmental and individual differences. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1–78.Google Scholar
Kok, K. and Cienki, A. (2014). Taking simulation semantics out of the laboratory: Towards an interactive and multimodal reappraisal of embodied language comprehension. Language and Cognition, 25, 1–22.Google Scholar
Koller, V. and Semino, E. (2009). Metaphor, politics and gender: A case study from Germany. In Ahrens, K. (ed.) Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 9–35.Google Scholar
Körner, H., Newman, C. and Mao, L. (2011). ‘The black dog just came and sat on my face and built a kennel’: Gay men making sense of ‘depression’. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 15 (4), 417–436.Google Scholar
Kouchaki, M., Gino, F. and Jami, A. (2014). The Burden of Guilt: Heavy Backpacks, Light Snacks, and Enhanced Morality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143 (1), 414–420.Google Scholar
Kousta, S.T., Vinson, D. and Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112, 473–481.Google Scholar
Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M. and Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140 (1), 14–34.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2019). Metaphorical creativity – The case of emotion. Paper presented at The Creative Power of Metaphor Conference, Worcester College, University of Oxford, 30–31 March 2019.Google Scholar
Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgement and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 332–351.Google Scholar
Lacey, S., Stilla, R. and Sathian, K. (2012). Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and Language, 120, 416–421.Google Scholar
Lakens, D., Semin, G. and Foroni, F. (2011). Why your highness needs the people: Comparing the absolute and relative representation of power in vertical space. Social Psychology, 42 (3), 205–213.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1996). Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualising the self. In Fauconnier, G. and Sweetser, E. (eds.) Spaces, Worlds and Grammar, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 91–123.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In Gibbs, R. W. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 773–785.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2002). Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics, 13 (3), 245–263.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Núñez, R. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From: The Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Robinson, M. and Meier, B. (Eds.) (2015). The Power of Metaphor: Examining the Influence on Social Life, Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D. and Greenberg, J. (2009). Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes. Psychological Science, 20 (11), 1421–1427.Google Scholar
Langdon, R., Coltheart, M., Ward, P. B. and Catts, S. V. (2002). Disturbed communication in schizophrenia: The role of poor pragmatics and poor theory-of-mind. Psychological Medicine, 32 (7), 1273–1284.Google Scholar
Langston, W. (2002). Violating orientational metaphors slows reading. Discourse Processes, 34, 281–310.Google Scholar
Larson, S. (2012). Musical Forces: Motion, Metaphor and Meaning in Music, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, E. H. and Schnall, S. (2014). The influence of social power on weight perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1719–1725.Google Scholar
Lee, W. S. and Schwarz, N. (2010). Washing away post-decisional dissonance. Science, 329, 709.Google Scholar
Lee, W. S. and Schwarz, N. (2012a). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103 (5), 737–749.Google Scholar
Lee, W. S. and Schwarz, N. (2012b). Metaphor in judgement and decision making. In Landau, M. J., Robinson, M. D. and Meier, B. P. (eds.) Metaphorical Thought in Social Life, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Leijssen, M. (2006) Verification of the body in psychotherapy. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 46 (2), 126–146.Google Scholar
Lempert, H. and Kinsbourne, M. (1982). Effect of laterality of orientation on verbal memory. Neurophysiologia, 20, 211–214.Google Scholar
Leung, A. et al. (2012). Embodied metaphor and creative acts. Psychological Science, 23, 502–509.Google Scholar
Levenson, M., Kiehl, K. and Fitzpatrick, C. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a non-institutionalised population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. and Majid, A. (2014). Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind and Language, 29, 407–427.Google Scholar
Lewkowicz, D. J. and Turkewitz, G. (1980). Cross-modal equivalence in early infancy: Auditory-visual intensity matching. Developmental Psychology, 16, 597–607.Google Scholar
Lewkowicz, D. J. and Turkewitz, G. (1981). Intersensory interaction in newborns: Modification of visual preferences following exposure to sound. Child Development, 52, 827–832.Google Scholar
Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2016). Who’s holding the moral high ground: Religiosity and the vertical conception of morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 178–182.Google Scholar
Li, X. (2010). Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Teaching of English and Chinese Idioms. Journal of Language Teaching And Research, 1 (3), 206–210.Google Scholar
Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C-B. and Galinsky, A. (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21, 381–383.Google Scholar
Lindsay, S., Scheepers, C. and Kamide, Y. (2013). Ro dash or dawdle: Verb-associated speed of motion influences eye movements during spoken sentence comprehension. PLoS ONE, 8 (6), e67187.Google Scholar
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogic al Perspectives, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lipowski, Z. J. (1988). Somatization: The concept and its clinical application. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145 (11), 1358–1368.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2001). Metaphoric competence: A possible language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style? TESOL Quarterly, 35 (3), 459–491.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2017). On the role of embodied cognition in the understanding and use of metonymy. In Hampe, B. (ed.) Metaphor, Embodied Cognition and Discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. and Kwong, R. (forthcoming). The use of metaphoric gestures by speakers of English as a first or second language: a comparative case study, In C. Lee (ed.) Language Choice, Use, and Pedagogies in the Bilingual Context, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. and Turner, (in prep.). A comparison of metaphor use by synaesthetes and non-synaesthetes.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., Turner, S. and Alexander, H. (in prep.). Investigating the Relationship between Metaphor, Gender and Social Distance.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., Pérez-Sobrino, P., Leung, D. and Julich, N. (forthcoming). What happens to word-colour associations when we speak a foreign language? In A. Piquer-Piriz and R. Alejo-Gonzalez (eds.) Metaphor in Foreign Language Instruction, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., Turner, S., Tuck, P. and Cassell, C. (in prep.). Soapy conveyor belts and wet sponges: The role of metaphor in evaluative conversations about the workplace.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. and Turner, S. (in press). Metaphors in communication about pregnancy loss, Metaphor and the Social World.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., Duffy, S., Turner, S., Pérez-Sobrino, P., Woodin, G. and Winter, B. (in prep.) Maths, music and metaphor: Conceptual developments in 5–8-year-old children.Google Scholar
Liu, M.-J., Shih, W.-L. and Ma, L.-Y. (2011). Are children with Asperger syndrome creative in divergent thinking and feeling? A brief report. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 5, 294–298. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2010.04.011.Google Scholar
Lossifova, R. and Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2012). Spatial and temporal deixis: The role of age and vision in the ontogeny of a child’s spatial and temporal cognition. Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 2 (2), 75–98.Google Scholar
Lourenco, S. F. and Longo, M. R. (2010). General magnitude system in young infants. Psychological Science, 21, 873–881.Google Scholar
Lourenco, S. F. and Longo, M. R. (2011). Origins and the development of generalized magnitude representation. In Dehaene, S. and Brannon, E. (eds.) Space, Time and Number in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 225–244.Google Scholar
Louwerse, M. (2008). Embodied relations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 838–844.Google Scholar
Low, G., Littlemore, J. and Koester, A. (2008). The use of metaphor in three university lectures. Applied Linguistics, 29 (3), 428–455.Google Scholar
Low, S. M. (1994). Embodied Metaphors: Nerves as lived experience. In Csordas, T. J. (ed.) Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self (Cambridge Studies in Medical Anthropology), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–162.Google Scholar
Lowe, M. (2017). Sounds Big: The Effects of Acoustic Pitch on Product Perceptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (2), 331–347.Google Scholar
Lynott, D. and Connell, L. (2010). Embodied conceptual combination. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
Lynott, D., Corker, K. S., Wortman, J., Connell, L., Donnellan, M. B., Lucas, R. E. and O’Brien, K. (2014). Replication of “Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth”. Social Psychology, 45, 216–222.Google Scholar
Maalej, Z. (2004) Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of embodiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 19 (1), 51–76.Google Scholar
Maalej, Z. A. and Yu, N. (eds.) (2011). Embodiment Via Body Parts: Studies from Various Languages and Cultures, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
MacCormac, E. R. (1986). Creative metaphors. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1 , 171–184.Google Scholar
Macedonia, M. (2014). Bringing back the body into the mind: Gestures enhance word learning in foreign language. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–7.Google Scholar
Macedonia, M. and Klimesch, W. (2014). Long-term effects of gestures on memory for foreign language words trained in the classroom. Mind, Brain and Education, 8 (2), 74–88.Google Scholar
Macedonia, M., Müller, K. and Friederici, A. D. (2010). The impact of iconic gestures on language word learning and its neural substrate. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 982–998.Google Scholar
MacKay, G. and Shaw, A. (2004). A comparative study of figurative language in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 20 (1), 13–32.Google Scholar
Maglio, S. and Trope, Y. (2012). Disembodiment: Abstract construal attenuates the influence of contextual bodily state in judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141 (2), 211–216.Google Scholar
Mahon, B. and Carramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology, 102 (1–3), 59–70.Google Scholar
Mairs, N. (1996). Waist High in the World: A Life among the Disabled, Boston MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Majid, A. and Burenhult, N. (2014). Odors are expressable in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition, 130 (2), 266–270.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. (2005). How to build a baby: III. Image schemas and the transition to verbal thought. In Hampe, B. (ed.) From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 137–164.Google Scholar
Marin, A., Reimann, M. and Castano, R. (2014). Metaphors and creativity: Direct, moderating and mediating effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (2), 290–297.Google Scholar
Marks, L. E. (1975). On colored hearing synesthesia: Cross-modal translations of sensory dimensions. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 303–331.Google Scholar
Marks, L. E. (1982a). Bright sneezes and dark coughs, loud sunlight and soft moonlight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 177–193.Google Scholar
Marks, L. E. (1982b). Synaesthesic perception and poetic metaphor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 15–23.Google Scholar
Marks, L. E. (2013). Weak synesthesia in perception and language. In Simner, J. and Hubbard, E. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marks, L. E., Hammeal, R. J. and Bornstein, M. H. (1987). Perceiving Similarity and Comprehending Metaphor, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Martel, L. F. and Biller, H. B. (1987). Stature and Stigma: the Biopsychosocial Development of Short Males, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Martin, J. and White, P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Mashal, N. and Kasirer, A. (2011). Thinking maps enhance metaphoric competence in children with autism and learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2045–2054.Google Scholar
Mashal, N., Faust, M., Hendler, T. and Jung-Beeman, M. (2007). An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expressions. Brain and Language, 100, 115–126.Google Scholar
Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory and Cognition, 32 (8), 1389–1400.Google Scholar
Matsuki, K. (1995). Metaphors of anger in Japanese. In Taylor, J. R. and MacLaury, R. E. (eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 137–151.Google Scholar
Matthews, J. and Matlock, T. (2011). Understanding the link between spatial distance and social distance. Social Psychology, 42 (3), 1850192.Google Scholar
Maurer, D. (1993). Neonatal synaesthesia: Implications for processing of speech and faces. In de Boysson-Bardies, B., de Schoenen, S., Jusczyk, P., Mc Neilage, P. and Morton, J. (eds.) Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 109–124.Google Scholar
McCafferty, S. (2004). Space for cognition: Gesture and second language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (1), 148–165.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. and Burnham, D. (2008). Power is the Great Motivator, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
McGlone, M. (1996). Conceptual metaphors and figurative language interpretation: Food for thought? Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 544–565.Google Scholar
McGlone, M. (2007). What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor? Language and Communication, 27, 109–126.Google Scholar
McGlone, F., Howard, M. and Roberts, N. (2002). Brain activation to passive observation of grasping actions. In Stamenov, M. and Gallese, V. (eds.) Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 125–134.Google Scholar
McMullen, L. and Conway, J. (2002). Conventional metaphors for depression. In Fussell, S. R. (ed.) The Verbal Communication of Emotions: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, London: Taylor and Francis., pp. 167–181.Google Scholar
McQuarrie, E. F. and Mick, D. (2003). The contribution of semiotic and rhetorical perspectives to the explanation of visual persuasion in advertising. In Scott, L. and Batra, R. (eds.) Persuasive Imagery: A Consumer Response Perspective, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 191–221.Google Scholar
McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S. and McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavioural Research Methods, 37, 547–559.Google Scholar
Meier, B. and Dionne, S. (2009). Downright sexy: Verticality, implicit power, and perceived physical attractiveness. Social Cognition, 27, 883–892.Google Scholar
Meier, B. and Robinson, M. (2004). Why the sunny side is up. Psychological Science, 15, 243–247.Google Scholar
Meier, B. and Robinson, M. (2006). Does ‘feeling down’ mean seeing down? Depressive symptoms and vertical selective attention. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 451–461.Google Scholar
Meier, B., Selbom, M. and Wygant, D. B. (2007). Failing to take the moral high ground: Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43 (4), 757–767.Google Scholar
Meier, B., Robinson, M., Crawford, L. and Ahlvers, W. (2007). When ‘light’and ‘dark’ thoughts become light and dark responses: Affect biases brightness judgements. Emotion, 7, 366–376.Google Scholar
Meir, I. (2010) Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language, 86 (4), 865–896.Google Scholar
Melogno, S., Pinto, M. A. and Levi, G. (2012). Metaphor and metonymy in ASD children: A critical review from a developmental perspective. Research in Autistic Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1289–1296.Google Scholar
Merabet, L. and Pascuale-Leone, A. (2010). Neural reorganization following sensory loss: The opportunity of change. Natural Review of Neurosciences, 11 (1), 44–52.Google Scholar
Meteyard, L., Rodriguez Cuadrado, S., Bahrami, B. and Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48 (7), pp. 788–804.Google Scholar
Miall, D. S. (1987). Metaphor and affect: The problem of creative thought. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2, 81–96.Google Scholar
Michalak, J., Rohde, K. and Troje, N. F. (2015). How we walk affects what we remember: Gait modifications through biofeedback change negative affective memory bias. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 46, 121–125.Google Scholar
Mikolajczuk, A. (1998). The metonymic and metaphoric conceptualization of ‘anger’ in Polish. In Athanasjadou, A. and Tabakowska, E. (eds.) Speaking of Emotions: Conceptualization and Expression, Berlin: Mouton, pp. 153–191.Google Scholar
Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K. and Macrae, C. N. (2010b). Moving through time. Psychological Science, 21, 222–223.Google Scholar
Miles, L. K., Betkra, E., Pendry, L. and Macrae, C. N. (2010a). Rapid communication mapping temporal constructs: Actions reveal that time is a place. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63 (11), 2113–2119.Google Scholar
Miller, L. C., Murphy, R. and Buss, A. H. (1981). Consciousness of body: Private and public. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41 (2), 397.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. and Snyder, S. (2006). Narrative prosthesis and the materiality of metaphor. In David, L. J. (ed.) The Disability Studies Reader, London: Routledge, pp. 205–220.Google Scholar
Mittal, V. A., Tessner, K. D., McMillan, A. L., Delawalla, Z., Trotman, H. D. and Walker, E. F. (2006). Gesture behavior in unmedicated schizotypal adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 351– 358.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2008). Peircean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar. In Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (eds.), Metaphor and Gesture, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 115–154.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2013). The exbodied mind: Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D. and Teßendorf, S. (eds.), Body – Language – Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, 1, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 755–784.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I. and Waugh, L. (2009). Metonymy first, metaphor second, a cognitive semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In Forceville, C. and Urios-Aparisi, M. (eds.) Multimodal Metaphor, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 336–350.Google Scholar
Mo, S., Su, Y., Chan, R. and Liu, J. (2008). Comprehension of metaphor and irony in schizophrenia during remission: The role of theory of mind and IQ. Psychiatry Research, 157 (1–3), 21–29.Google Scholar
Molnar-Szakacs, I., Wu, A., Robles, F. and Iaconabi, M. (2007). Do you see what I mean? Corticospinal excitability during observation of culture-specific gestures. PLoS ONE, 2 (7), e626.Google Scholar
Most, S. B., Verbeck Sorber, A. and Cunningham, J. G. (2005). Auditory Stroop reveals implicit gender associations in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 287–294.Google Scholar
Mould, T., Oades, L. and Crowe, T. (2010). The use of metaphor for understanding and managing psychotic experiences: A systematic review. Journal of Mental Health, 19 (3), 282–293.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Müller, C. and Ladewig, S. H. (2013). Metaphors for sensorimotor experiences: Gestures as embodied and dynamic conceptualizations of balance in dance lessons. In Borkent, M., Dancyger, B. and Hinnell, J. (eds.) Language and the Creative Mind, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publication, pp. 295–324.Google Scholar
Müller, C. and Tag, S. (2010). The dynamics of metaphor: Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 6, 85–120.Google Scholar
Mulvenna, C. (2013). Synaesthesia and creativity. In Simner, J. and Hubbard, C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Synaesthesia, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 607–631.Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2014). Metaphors: Sources for intercultural misunderstanding? International Journal of Language and Culture, 1 (1), 242–259.Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2017). Metaphor and Cultural Cognition. In Sharifian, F. (ed.) Advances in Cultural Linguistics, Springer Singapore, pp. 325–344.Google Scholar
Nadeau, J. W. (2006). Metaphorically speaking: The use of metaphors in grief therapy. Illness Crisis and Loss, 14 (3), 201–221.Google Scholar
Neufeld, J., Sinke, C., Dillo, W., Emrich, H. M., Szycik, G. R., Dim, D., Bleich, S. and Zedler, M. (2012). The neural correlates of coloured music: A functional MRI investigation of auditory–visual synaesthesia. Neuropsychologia, 50 (1), 85–89.Google Scholar
Norbury, C. (2005). The relationship between theory of mind and metaphor: Evidence from children with language impairment and Autistic Spectrum Disorder. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 383–399.Google Scholar
Núñez, R. (2005). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In Iida, F., Pfeifer, R., Steels, L. and Kuniyoshi, Y. (eds.), Embodied Artificial Intelligence, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, (pp. 54–73).Google Scholar
Núñez, R. and Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30: 401–450.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1994). The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Hinton, N. and Ohala, J. J. (eds.) Sound Symbolism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–347.Google Scholar
Okita, S. and Schwartz, L. (2006). Young children’s understanding of animacy and entertainment robots. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 3 (3), 1–20.Google Scholar
Olofson, E. L., Casey, D., Oluyedun, O. A., Van Herwegen, J., Becerra, A. and Rundblad, G. (2014). Youth with autism spectrum disorder comprehend lexicalized and novel primary conceptual metaphors. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1–16.Google Scholar
Olofsson, J. and Gottfried, J. (2015). The muted sense: Neurocognitive limitations of olfactory language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19 (6), 314–321.Google Scholar
Ooi, R. L., Wu, B. and He, Z. J. (2001). Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature, 414, 197–200.Google Scholar
Ortony, A., Teynolds, R. E. and Wilson, P. T. (1984). Sources of difficulty in the young child’s understanding of metaphorical language. Child Development, 55, 1588–1606.Google Scholar
Özçalişkan, Ş. (2002). Metaphors We Move By: A Crosslinguistic-Developmental Analysis of Metaphorical Motion Events in English and Turkish, Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Özçalişkan, Ş. (2004). Time can’t fly, but a bird can: Learning to think and talk about time as spatial motion in English and Turkish. European Journal of English Studies, 8 (3), 309–336,Google Scholar
Özçalişkan, S. (2005). On learning to draw the distinction between physical and metaphorical motion: Is metaphor an early emerging cognitive and linguistic capacity? Journal of child language, 32, 291.Google Scholar
Özçalişkan, Ş. (2007). Metaphors we move by: Children’s developing understanding of metaphorical motion in typologically distinct languages. Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 147–168.Google Scholar
Ozturk, O., Krehm, M. and Vouloumanos, A. (2013). Sound symbolism in infancy? Evidence for sound-shape: Cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114 (2), 173–186.Google Scholar
Papagno, C. (2001). Comprehension of metaphors and idioms in patients with Alzeimer’s disease, A longitudinal study. Brain, 124, 1450–1460.Google Scholar
Papagno, C., Cappa, S. F., Forelli, A., Garavaglia, G., Laiscona, M., Capitani, E. and Vallar, G. (1995). La comprehension non letteral del linguaggio: Tartura di un test di comprensione di metafore e di espressioni idiomatche. Archivo di Psicologia Neurologia e Psichiatroia, 4, 402–420.Google Scholar
Papesh, A. H. (2015). Just out of reach: On the reliability of the action-sentence compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology (General), 144 (6), 116–141.Google Scholar
Papp, P. (1982). Staging reciprocal metaphors in a couples group. Family Process, 21 (4), 453–467.Google Scholar
Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R. and Barselou, L. W. (2003). Verifying properties from different modalities for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119–124.Google Scholar
Peñalba Acitores, A., Moriyón Mojica, C., Luque Perea, S. and Cabezas Clavijo, G. (2015). La metáfora conceptual como recurso pedagógico musical para personas sordas y con discapacidad auditiva, Actas del Congreso CNLSE de la Lengua de Signos Española, 87–108.Google Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P., Littlemore, J. and Houghton, D. (2018). The role of figurative complexity in the comprehension and appreciation of advertisements. Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Perlman, M. and Gibbs, R. (2013). Sensorimotor simulation in speaking, gesturing and understanding. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D. and Tessendorf, S. (eds.) Body-Language-Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, (vol. 1). Walter de Gruyter,. pp. 512–532.Google Scholar
Phelps, E. A. (2004). Human emotion and memory: Interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 198–202.Google Scholar
Ping, R., Dhillon, S. and Beilock, S. (2009). Reach for what you like: The body’s role in shaping preferences, Emotion Review, 1 (2), 140–150.Google Scholar
Pollick, F., Paterson, H., Bruderlin, A. and Sanford, A. (2001). Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition, 82, 51–61.Google Scholar
Popova, Y. (2005). Image schemas and verbal synaesthesia, In Hampe, B. and Grady, J. E. (eds.) From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 395–419.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (1), 1–39.Google Scholar
Proust, M. (1908). A La Recherche du Temps Perdu, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ptzemyslaw, J., van der Lans, J. and Hermans, C. (1998). Metaphor theories and religious language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 13, 287–292.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V., Blakeslee, S. and Shah, N. (1998). Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind, New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. and Hubbard, E. (2001). Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8 (12), 3–34.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. and Matlock, T. (2007). The integration of figurative language and static depictions: An eye movement study of fictive motion. Cognition, 102 (1), 129–138.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. P., Strange, B. A. and Dolan, R. J. (2004). Encoding of emotional memories depends on amygdala and hippocampus and their interactions. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 278–285.Google Scholar
Richardson, P. (2012). A closer walk: A study of the interaction between metaphors related to movement and proximity and presuppositions about the reality of belief in Christian and Muslim testimonials. Metaphor and the Social World, 2 (2), 233–261.Google Scholar
Riding, R. J. (1991). Cognitive Styles Analysis, Birmingham: Learning and Training Technology.Google Scholar
Rieser, J. J., Garing, A. E. and Young, M. F. (1994). Imagery, action, and young children's spatial orientation: It's not being there that counts, it's what one has in mind. Child Development, 65 (5), 1262–1278.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, L., Vecchi, T., Fantino, M., Merabet, L. and Cattaneo, Z. (2017). The ego-moving metaphor of time relies on visual experience: No representation of time along the sagittal space axis in the blind, Journal of Experimental Psychology, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000373.Google Scholar
Ritchie, I. (1991). Fusion of the Faculties: A Study of the Language of the Senses in Hausaland. In Howes, D. (ed.) The Varieties of Sensory Experience: A Sourcebook in the Anthropology of the Senses, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 193–195.Google Scholar
Rittenhouse, R. K., Morreau, L. E. and Iran-Nejad, A. (1981). Metaphor and conservation in deaf and hard-of-hearing children. American Annals of the Deaf, 126 (4), 450–453.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. and Buccino, G. (2005). The mirror-neuron system and its role in imitation and language. In Dehaene, S., Duhamel, J.-R., Hauser, M. D. and Rizzolatti, G. (eds.) From Monkey Brain to Human Brain, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 213–234.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V. and Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Research, 3, 131–141.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. V. and Herman, C. P. (1986). The psychology of height: An empirical review. In Herman, C. P., Zanna, M. P. and Higgins, E. T. (eds.) Physical Appearance, Stigma and Social Behaviour, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 113–140.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D., Zabelina, D. L., Ode, S. & Moeller, S. K. (2008). The vertical nature of dominance–submission: Individual differences in vertical attention. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 933–948.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D. and Fetterman, A. K. (2015). The embodiment of success and failure as forward versus backward movements. PLoS ONE, 10 (2), e0117285. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117285.Google Scholar
Roehling, M.V. (1999). Weight-based discrimination in employment: Psychological and legal aspects. Personnel Psychology, 52, 969–1016.Google Scholar
Rohrer, T. (2006). The body in space: Dimensions of embodiment. In Zlatev, J., Ziemke, T., Frank, R. and Dirven, R., (eds.) Body, Language and Mind, vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 339–378.Google Scholar
Rosch, E., Thompson, E. and Varela, F. (1991): The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, P. C. (2000). Parent Grief: Narratives of Loss and Relationships, Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, P. C. (2007). Recovery following bereavement: Metaphor, phenomenology, and culture. Death Studies, 32 (1), 6–16.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. and Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5 (4), 296–320.Google Scholar
Ruby, P. and Decetry, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 546–550.Google Scholar
Rueckert, L., Breckinridge Church, R, Avila, A. and Trejo, T. (2017) Gesture enhances learning of a complex statistical concept. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2, 2.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. and Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive Modelling: A Linguistic Perspective, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rundblad, G. and Annaz, D. (2010). Development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension: Receptive vocabulary and conceptual knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28 (3), 547–563.Google Scholar
Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B. L., Umilta, C. and Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect. Cognition, 99 (2), 113–129.Google Scholar
Russo, N., Foxe, J. J., Brandwein, A. B., Altschuler, T., Gomes, H. and Molholm, H. (2010). Multisensory processing in children with autism: High-density electrical mapping of auditory–somatosensory integration. Autism Research, 3, 1–15.Google Scholar
Saikaluk, P., Pexman, P., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. and Sears, C. (2008). Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body object interaction effect. Cognition, 106, 433–443.Google Scholar
Saj, A., Fuhrman, O., Vuileumier, P. and Boroditsky, L. (2014). Patients with left spatial neglect also neglect the ‘left side’ of time. Psychological Science, 25 (1), 207–214.Google Scholar
Samur, D., Lai, V. T., Hagoort, P. and Willems, R. M. (2015). Emotional context modulates embodied metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 78, 108–114.Google Scholar
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer, T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, G., Tufvesson, S., van Putten, S. and Majid, A. (2014). Vision words dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual words varies. Cognitive Linguistics, 26 (1), 31–60.Google Scholar
Sato, M. and Bergen, B. K. (2013). The case of the missing pronouns: Does mentally simulated perspective play a functional role in the comprehension of person. Cognition, 127 (3), 361–374Google Scholar
Saygin, A. P., McCullough, S., Alac, M. and Emmorey, K. (2010). Modulation of BOLD response in motion-sensitive lateral temporal cortex by real and fictive motion sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 22 (11), 2480–2490.Google Scholar
Schnall, S. (2016). Disgust as embodied loss aversion. European Review of Social Psychology, 28, 50–94.Google Scholar
Schnall, S. (2017). Social and contextual constraints on embodied perception. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 325–340.Google Scholar
Schnall, S., Benton, J. and Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219–1222.Google Scholar
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L. and Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096–1109.Google Scholar
Schnall, S., Harber, K., Stefanucci, J. and Proffit, D. R. (2008). Social support and the perception of geographical slant. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1246–1255.Google Scholar
Schneider, I. K., Rutjens, B. T., Jostmann, N. B. and Lakens, D. (2011). Weighty matters: Importance feels heavy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2 (5), 474–478.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A. and Zuccolotti, A. (2002). E-Prime Reference Guide, Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Schroder, U. (2009). Preferential metaphorical conceptualizations in everyday discourse about love in Brazilian and German speech communities. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 105–120.Google Scholar
Schubert, T. (2004). The power in your hand: Gender differences in bodily feedback from making a fist. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (6).Google Scholar
Schubert, T. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (1–21), 757–769.Google Scholar
Schubert, T. W. and Koole, S. L. (2009). The embodied self: Making a fist enhances men’s power-related self-conceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 828–834.Google Scholar
Schubert, T. W. and Semin, G. R. (2009). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39 (7), 1135–1141.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M. B., O’Neill Chambills, H., Brownel, K. D., Blair, S. N. and Billington, C. (2003). Weight bias among health professionals specializing in obesity. Obesity Research, 11 (9), 1033–1039.Google Scholar
Searles, H. (1962). The differentiation between concrete and metaphorical thinking in the recovering schizophrenic patient, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.Google Scholar
Semin, G. and Cacioppo, J. (2009). From embodied representation to co-regulation. In Pineda, J. A. (ed.) Mirror Neuron Systems, New York: Humana Press, 107–120.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2010). Descriptions of pain, metaphor and embodied simulation. Metaphor and Symbol, 25, 205–226.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2011). Metaphor, creativity, and the experience of pain across genres. In Swann, J., Carter, R. and Pope, R. (eds.) Creativity, Language, Literature: The State of the Art, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 83–102.Google Scholar
Semino, E. et al. (2014). ‘Metaphor in end-of-life care’ http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk/project/864ABFAA-A301–42CD-8DA1–1FF5967527AF.Google Scholar
Semino, E. and Koller, V. (2009). Metaphor, politics and gender: A case study from Italy. In Ahrens, K. (ed.) Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 36–61.Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2008). Conceptualizations of del ‘heart-stomah’ in Persian. In Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Ning, Y. and Niemeier, S. (eds.) Culture, Body, and Language: Conceptualizations of Internal Body Organs across Cultures and Languages, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 247–266.Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural Linguistics, Cognitive Studies in Cultural Contexts, 8, Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Yu, N. and Niemeier, S. (eds.) (2008). Culture, Body, and Language: Conceptualizations of Internal Body Organs across Cultures and Languages, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. (1996). How metaphoric interpretations effect dynamic insight: Development of a model to represent how metaphoric interpretations effect dynamic insight in psychotherapy patients, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Shayan, S., Ozturk, O. and Sicoli, M. A. (2011). The thickness of pitch: Cross-modal metaphors in Farsi, Turkish, and Zapotec. The Senses and Society, 6 (1), 96–105.Google Scholar
Shen, Y. 1997). Cognitive constraints on poetic figures. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (1), 33–71.Google Scholar
Sherman, G. and Clore, G. (2009). The color of sin: White and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution. Psychological Science, 20 (8), 1019–1025.Google Scholar
Schinazi, V. R., Thrash, T. and Chebat, D. R. (2016). Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals. WIREs Cognitive Science, 7, 37–58.Google Scholar
Shintel, H., Nusbaum, H. C. and Okrent, A. (2006). Analogue acoustic expression in speech communication, Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 167–177.Google Scholar
Simner, J. (2007). Beyond perceptuion: Synaesthesia as a psycholinguistic phenomenon. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11 (1), 23–29.Google Scholar
Simner, J., Ward, J., Lanz, M., Jansaric, A., Noonan, K., Glovera, L and Oakley, D. (2004). Non-random associations of graphemes to colours in synaesthetic and non-synaesthetic populations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22 (8), 1069–1085.Google Scholar
Siqueira, M. and Gibbs, R. W. (2007). Children’s acquisition of primary metaphors: A cross linguistic study. Organon (UFRGS), 21, 161–179.Google Scholar
Siqueira, M. and Marques, D. F. (2016). Figurative language comprehension by hearing impaired children. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference of the International Association of Researching and Applying Metaphor, Freie Universitat, Berlin.Google Scholar
Siqueira, M., Marques, D. F. and Gibbs, R. W. (2016). Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: A critical review. Scripta, Belo Horizonte, 20 (40), 36–60.Google Scholar
Skårderud, F. (2007). Eating one’s words, Part 1: ‘Concretised metaphors’ and reflective function in anorexia nervosa – An interview study. European Eating Disorders Review, 15, 163–174.Google Scholar
Skipper, J., Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H. and Small, S. (2007). Speech-associated gestures, Broca’s area and the human mirror system. Brain and Language, 101 (3), 260–277.Google Scholar
Slepian, M., Weisbuch, M., Rule, N. O. and Ambady, N. (2011). Tough and tender: Embodied categorization of gender. Psychological Science, 22 (1), 26–28.Google Scholar
Slepian, M. L., Masicampo, E. J., Toosi, Negin R. and Ambady, N. (2012). The physical burdens of secrecy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141 (4), 619–624.Google Scholar
Slepian, M. L. and Ambody, N. (2014). Simulating sensorimotor metaphors: Novel metaphors influence sensory judgments. Cognition, 130, 309–314.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. (eds.) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–96.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (2005), Linguistic representations of motion events: What is signifier and what is signified? In Maeder, C., Fischer, O. and Herlofsky, W. (eds.) Iconicity Inside Out: Iconicity in Language and Literature 4, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Smith, L. B. and Sera, M. D. (1992). A developmental analysis of the polar structure of dimensions. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 99–142.Google Scholar
Speed, L. and Vigliocco, G. (2014). Eye movements reveal the dynamic simulation of speed in language. Cognitive Science, 38, 367–382.Google Scholar
Speer, N., Zacks, J. and Reynolds, J. (2007). Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries. Psychological Science, 18 (5), 449–455.Google Scholar
Spence, C., Nickolls, M. and Driver, J. (2001). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Perception and Psychophysics, 63 (2), 330–336.Google Scholar
Spence, C., Wan, X., Woods, A., Velasco, C., Deng, J., Youssef, J. and Deroy, O. (2015). On tasty colours and colorful tastes? Assessing, explaining, and utilizing crossmodal correspondences between colours and basic tastes, Flavour, 4 (23), 1–17.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, M. and Carey, S. (2010). The long and short of it: On the nature and origin of functional overlap between representations of space and time. Cognition, 16, 217–241.Google Scholar
Stamenov, M. (2002). Some features that make mirror neurons and the human language faculty unique. In Stamenov, M. and Gallese, V. (eds.) Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 249–272.Google Scholar
Stanfield, R. A. and Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153–156.Google Scholar
Stayman, D. and Kardes, F. (1992). Spontaneous inference processes in advertizing: Effects of need for cognition and self-monitoring on inference generation and utlization. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1 (2), 125–142.Google Scholar
Stec, K. and Sweetser, E. (2013). Borobudur and Chartres: Religious spaces as performative real-space blends. In Caballero, R. and Diaz Vera, J. E. (eds.) Sensuous Cognition, Explorations into Human Sentience,: Imagination, Emotion and Perception, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 265–291.Google Scholar
Steen, G. (2015). Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72.Google Scholar
Steen, G., Reijnierse, G. and Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLoS ONE DOI: 10. 1371/journal.pone.0113536.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. and Goschler, J. (2009). Sex differences in the usage of spatial metaphors: A case study of political language. In Ahrens, K. (ed.) Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 166–183.Google Scholar
Stepper, S. and Strack, F. (1993). Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 211–220.Google Scholar
Stites, L. and Özçalışkan, Ş. (2012). Developmental changes in children’s comprehension and explanation of spatial metaphors for time. Journal of child language, 1.Google Scholar
Stites, L. and Özçalışkan, Ş. (2013). Teasing apart the role of cognitive and verbal factors in children’s early metaphorical abilities. Metaphor and Symbol, 28, 116–129.Google Scholar
Storbeck, J. and Clore, G. (2008). Affective arousal as information: How affective arousal influences judgments, learning, and memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1824–1843.Google Scholar
Strack, F., Martin, L. L. and Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (5), 768.Google Scholar
Straube, B., Green, A., Sass, K. and Kircher, T. (2014). Superior temporal sulcus disconnectivity during processing of metaphoric gestures in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40 (4), 936–944.Google Scholar
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662,Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis, English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E., 1990, From Etymology to Pragmatics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Berkeley Working Papers in Linguistics, 480–519.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L. and Garrett, M. F. (eds.) Language and Space, Boston, MA: MIT Press, pp. 211–276.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics (vols. 1–2), Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Taub, S. (2001). Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tay, D. (2017). Exploring the metaphor-body-psychotherapy relationship. Metaphor and Symbol, 32 (3), 178–191.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (2012). The Mental Corpus, How Language is Represented in the Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Terman, M., Terman, J. S. and Ross, D. C. (1998). A controlled trial of timed bright light and negative air ionization for treatment of winter depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 875–882.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. and Shelley, C. (2006). Emotional analogies and analogical inference. In Thagard, P. (ed.) Hot Thought Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 27–50.Google Scholar
Thibault, P. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23, 210–245.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H. and Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6 (2), e16782. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016782.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H. and Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8, e52961.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, P., Hendricks, R. and Boroditsky, L. (2017). Jow linguistic metaphor scaffolds reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, J. and Matsumoto, D. (2008). The spontaneous expression of pride and shame: Evidence for biologically innate nonverbal displays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (33), 11655–11660.Google Scholar
Turatto, M., Galfano, G., Bridgeman, B. and Umilta, C. (2004). Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in audirtory, tactile and visual systems. Experimental Brain Rsesearch, 155, 301–310.Google Scholar
Turner, S., Littlemore, J., Burgess, M., Fuller, D., Kuberska, K. and McGuinness, S. (forthcoming). The production of time-related metaphors by people who have experienced pregnancy loss. In A. Gargett and J. Barnden (eds.) The Production of Metaphor, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S. and Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515–557.Google Scholar
Ureña, J-M. and Faber, P. (2010). Reviewing imagery in resemblance and non-resemblance metaphors. Cognitive Linguistics, 21 (1), 123–149.Google Scholar
Van Beek, W. E. A. (1992). The dirty smith: Smell as a social frontier among the Kapsiki/Higi of north Cameroon and north-eastern Nigeria. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 62 (1), 38–58.Google Scholar
Van Herwegen, J., Dimitriou, D. and Rundblad, G. (2013). Development of novel metaphor and metonymy comprehension in typically developing children and Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1300–1311.Google Scholar
Van Quaquebeke, Niels and Giessner, S. R., How Embodied Cognitions Affect Judgments: Height-Related Attribution Bias in Football Foul Calls (January 2010 2,). ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2010-006-ORG. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1542487.Google Scholar
Viberg, Å. (1983). The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics, 21, 123–162.Google Scholar
Viberg, Å. (1993). Crosslinguistic perspectives on lexical organization and lexical progression. In Hyltenstam, K. and Viberg, Å. (eds.) Progression and Regression in Language: Sociocultural, Neuropsychological and Linguistic Perspectives, 340–385. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vidali, A. (2010). Seeing what we know: Disability and theories of metaphor. Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies, 4 (1), 33–54.Google Scholar
Vosniadou, S. (1989). Context and the Development of Metaphor Comprehension. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4, 159–171.Google Scholar
Waggoner, J. E. and Palermo, D. S. (1989). Betty is a bouncing bubble: Children’s comprehension of emotion-descriptive metaphors. Developmental Psychology, 25, 152–163.Google Scholar
Wagner, K. and Dobkins, K. R. (2011). Synaesthetic associations decrease during infancy. Psychological Science, 22 (8), 1067–1072.Google Scholar
Walker, P., Bremner, J. G., Mason, U., Spring, J. Mattock, K. Slater, A. and Johnson, P. (2010). Preverbal infants’ sensitivity to synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences. Psychological Science, 21, 21–25.Google Scholar
Wallbott, N. (1998). Bodily expression of emotion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 879–896.Google Scholar
Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A. H., Vuust, P., Dohne, A., Roepstorff, A. and Lund, T. E. (2011). BOLD response to motion verbs in left posterior middle temporal gyrus during short story comprehension. Brain and Language, 119 (3), 221–225.Google Scholar
Walsh, V. (2003). A Theory of Magnitude, common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7 (11), 483–488.Google Scholar
Walther, S. and Mittal, V. (2016). Why we should take a closer look at gestures. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 42 (2): 259–261.Google Scholar
Walther, S., Stegmayer, K., Sulzbacher, J. et al. (2015). Nonverbal social communication and gesture control in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 41, 338–345.Google Scholar
Wan, X., Woods, A. T., van den Bosch, J., McKenzie, K. J., Velasco, C. and Spence, C. (2014). Cross-cultural differences in cross-modal correspondences between tastes and visual features. Frontiers of Psychology and Cognition, 5, 1365.Google Scholar
Wang, C. and Dowker, A. (2010). A cross-cultural study of metaphoric understanding, In Low, G., Todd, Z., Deignan, A. and Cameron, L. (eds.) Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 105–122.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. and Spence, C. (2017). Assessing the role of emotional associations in mediating crossmodal correspondences between classical music and red wine. Beverages, 3 (1).Google Scholar
Ward, J., Thompson-Lake, D., Ely, R. and Kaminski, F. (2008). Synaesthesia, creativity and art: What is the link? The British Journal of Psychology, 99, 127–141.Google Scholar
Webb, T. L., Miles, E. and Sheeran, P. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 775–808.Google Scholar
Wehling, E., Gamez-Djokic, V. and Aziz-Zadeh, L. (2015). Does the brain grasp politics, even when it doesn’t?: Modulation of motor and premotor areas by affirmative and negated hand-action metaphors, Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the International Cognitive Linguistics Association, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
Wilcox, P. (2000). Metaphor in American Sign Language, Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. (2004). Conceptual spaces and embodied actions: Cognitive iconicity and signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (2), 119–147.Google Scholar
Willems, R.M. and Hagoort, P. (2007). Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture, and action: A review. Brain and Language, 101, 278–289.Google Scholar
Williams, J.M. (1976). Synaesthesic adjectives: A possible law of semantic change. Language, 52, 461–478.Google Scholar
Williams, L., and Bargh, J. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth influences interpersonal warmth. Science, 322, 606–607.Google Scholar
Williams-Whitney, D., Mio, J. S. and Whitney, P. (1992). Metaphor production in creative writing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21 , 497–509.Google Scholar
Wills, D. D. (1977). Participant deixis in English and baby talk. In Snow, C. E. and Ferguson, C. A., eds. Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–298.Google Scholar
Wilson, N. and Gibbs, R. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31 , 721–731.Google Scholar
Winchester, D. (2016). A hunger for God: Embodied metaphor as cultural cognition in action. Social Forces, 95 (2), 585–606.Google Scholar
Winner, E., Engel, M. and Gardner, H. (1980). Misunderstanding metaphor: What’s the problem? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30 (1), 22–32.Google Scholar
Winner, E., Levy, J., Kaplan, J. and Rosenblatt, E. (1988). Children’s understanding of nonliteral language. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22 (1), 51–63.Google Scholar
Winner, E. (1997). The Point of Words: Children’s Understanding of Metaphor and Irony, Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, B. (2014). Horror movies and the cognitive ecology of primary metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 29 (3), 151–170.Google Scholar
Winter, B. (2016). Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1193619.Google Scholar
Winter, B. (2019) Sensory Linguistics: Language, Perception and Metaphor, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Winter, B. and Bergen, B. (2012). Language comprehenders represent object distance both visually and auditorily: Evidence for the immersed experiencer view. Language and Cognition, 4 (1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Winter, B and Matlock, T (2013) Making Judgments Based on Similarity and Proximity. Metaphor & Symbol, 28.Google Scholar
Winter, B., and Matlock, T. (2013). More is up and right: Random number generation along two axes. Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Winter, B., Perlman, M. and Matlock, T. (2014). Using space to talk and gesture about numbers: Evidence from the TV News Archive. Gesture, 13, 377–408.Google Scholar
Winter, B. and Matlock, T. (2017). Primary metaphors are both cultural and embodied. Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse, 99–115.Google Scholar
Winter, B., Perlman, M. and Majid, A. (2018). Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage. Cognition, 179.Google Scholar
Woodin, G., Winter, B., Perlman, M., Littlemore, J. and Matlock, T. (forthcoming) Metaphoric gestures for numerical quantities and emotional valence in the TV News Archive. Submitted to PLoS ONE.Google Scholar
Wright, P. H. and Scanlon, M. B. (1991). Gender role orientations and friendship: Some attenuation, but gender differences abound. Sex Roles, 24 (9019), 551–566.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (1995). Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbol, 10 , 59–92.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2002). Body and emotion: Body parts in Chinese expression of emotion. Pragmatics & Cognition, 10 (1), 341–367.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2000). Figurative uses of finger and palm in Chinese and English. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 159–175.Google Scholar
Yu, N., (2003). Synesthetic metaphor : A cognitive linguistic perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics, 32 (1): 19–34.Google Scholar
Zanolie, K. et al., (2012). Mighty metaphors: Behavioural and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension. Brain and Cognition, 78 , 50–58.Google Scholar
Zbikowski, L. M. (2002). Conceptualizing Music: Cognitive Structure, Theory and Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zentner, M. R. (2001). Preferences for colours and colour-emotion combinations in early childhood. Developmental Science, 4 (4), 389–398.Google Scholar
Zhiqun Xing, J. (2008). Semantics and Pragmatics of Color Terms in Chinese. Journal Of Historical Pragmatics, 9 (2), 315–319.Google Scholar
Zhong, C. B. and Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely. Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19 (9), 838–842.Google Scholar
Zhong, C. B. and Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452.Google Scholar
Zhong, C. B., Strejcek, B. and Sivanathan, N. (2010). A clean self can render harsh moral judgement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 (5), 859–862.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. (2012). Prologue: Bodily motion, emotion and mind science. In Foolen, A., Ludtke, U., Racine, T.P. and Zlatev, J. (Eds.) (2012). Moving Ourselves and Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. (2003). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 35–62.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18 (5), 229–234.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R., Stanfield, R., and Yaxley, R. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13 (2), 168–171.Google Scholar