Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- Editor's introduction
- Bibliographical note
- ‘The Budget and the Reform Bill’ (April 1860)
- ‘The House of Commons’ (July 1864)
- ‘The Reform Bill’ (April 1866)
- ‘The Change of Ministry’ (July 1866)
- ‘The Conservative Surrender’ (October 1867)
- ‘The Programme of the Radicals’ (October 1873)
- ‘Disintegration’ (October 1883)
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics
Editor's introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- Editor's introduction
- Bibliographical note
- ‘The Budget and the Reform Bill’ (April 1860)
- ‘The House of Commons’ (July 1864)
- ‘The Reform Bill’ (April 1866)
- ‘The Change of Ministry’ (July 1866)
- ‘The Conservative Surrender’ (October 1867)
- ‘The Programme of the Radicals’ (October 1873)
- ‘Disintegration’ (October 1883)
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics
Summary
SALISBURY'S JOURNALISM
The third Marquis of Salisbury led the Conservative party for twenty-one years (the first four in tandem with Sir Stafford Northcote), and was prime minister for nearly fourteen of them. He was arguably ‘the most formidable intellectual figure that the Conservative party has ever produced’. He was also one of the dominant European, indeed world, statesmen of the last quarter of the nineteenth century, hardly inferior in stature even to Bismarck. Yet, compared to men like Peel or Disraeli, he has not occupied the place in the Conservative hall of fame or received the attention from historians that might seem to be his due.
The failure to bulk more largely in party hagiography is perhaps not difficult to understand. Though the Conservative party enjoyed what was in many ways its heyday under Salisbury's leadership, it is hard to say that his role was crucial to its success, or that he gave to it any distinctive impulsion or policy that can be accounted fundamental in its development. Both Peel and Disraeli can be seen, with varying degrees of accuracy, as having played a vital part in the making of the modern party by fostering its adaptation to the political consequences of economic and social change, as crystallised in the Reform Acts of 1832 and 1867.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Lord Salisbury on PoliticsA selection from his articles in the Quarterly Review, 1860-1883, pp. 1 - 109Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1972
- 1
- Cited by