Forms of Countermovement and Counter-Reform in Latin America

doi:10.1017/9781009093859.004

4 - Forms of Countermovement and Counter-Reform in Latin America

Judicial Backlash or Resources and Political and Legal Opportunities?

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 August 2022

Alba Ruibal

Edited by

Sandra Botero ,

Daniel M. Brinks and

Ezequiel A. Gonzalez-Ocantos

Show author details

Sandra Botero: Affiliation:
Universidad del Rosario, Colombia
Daniel M. Brinks: Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Ezequiel A. Gonzalez-Ocantos: Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Through the study of processes of countermovement and counter-reform in the field of abortion law in Mexico, Colombia, Brazil and Argentina over the past two decades, this chapter contributes to the discussion of backlash. In contrast to the judicial backlash thesis, it argues that the conservative reaction to abortion rights gains in Latin America cannot be explained as a direct or specific response to court decisions. Instead, the chapter presents an account of the development of countermovements and counter-reforms from a sociological perspective, by tracing them back to their interaction with political and legal opportunities. It identifies four types of counter-mobilization and counter-reform, based on the predominant and most successful strategies deployed by conservative actors against abortion rights in the case studies. Brazil is an emblematic case of conservative forces leveraging their legislative power via the formation of an inter-religious caucus at the national Congress. Mexico is a case of conservative pressure on subnational legislative processes. Colombia is a case of counter-legal mobilization by institutional activists anchored in national state structures. Finally, Argentina is the case in which counter-legal mobilization by civil society actors is most salient.

Keywords

Judicial backlash Countermovements Counter-legal mobilization Legal opportunities Abortion Brazil Colombia Argentina Mexico

Type: Chapter
Information: The Limits of Judicialization
From Progress to Backlash in Latin America
, pp. 89 - 114

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093859.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, R. (2017) A onda-quebrada – evangélicos e conservadorismo. Cadernos Pagu 50, 1–27.Google Scholar

Amuchástegui, A., Cruz, G., Aldaz, E., & Mejía, M. C. (2010) Politics, Religion and Gender Equality in Contemporary Mexico: Women’s Sexuality and Reproductive Rights in a Contested Secular State. Third World Quarterly 31(6), 989–1005.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blofield, M. (2006) The Politics of Moral Sin: Abortion and Divorce in Spain, Chile and Argentina. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Casanova, A. (2000) Abortion in Brazil: Legislation, Reality and Options. Reproductive Health Matters 8(16), 66–76.Google Scholar

Botero, S. (2017) El plebiscito y los desafíos políticos de consolidar la paz negociada en Colombia. Revista de ciencia política 37(2), 369–88.Google Scholar

Corrêa, S., & Kalil, I. (2020) Políticas antigénero en América Latina: Brasil – ¿la catástrofe perfecta? Rio de Janeiro: Observatorio de Sexualidad y Política, ABIA, eBook.Google Scholar

Corrêa, S., & McIntyre, P. (2003) The John and Catherine MacArthur Foundation, 1990–2002. The Population and Reproductive Health Program in Brazil: Lessons Learned. Chicago, IL: The John and Catherine MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar

Coutinho, A. (2019) A Câmara dos Deputados e a questão do aborto: tensionamento no século XXI Faces de Clio 5(9), 123–44.Google Scholar

Diniz, D., & Carino, G. (2019) É injusto acusar movimentos sociais de judicializar a política, El Pais – Brasil, June 19.Google Scholar

Epp, C. (1998) The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gil, F. (2020) Políticas antigénero en América Latina: Colombia. Rio de Janeiro: Observatorio de Sexualidad y Política, ABIA, eBook.Google Scholar

González Ruiz, E. (2005) Cruces y sombras: Perfiles del conservadurismo en América Latina. Ciudad de México: Promsex.Google Scholar

Greenhouse, L., & Siegel, R. (2011) Before (and after) Roe v. Wade: New Questions about Backlash. Yale Law Journal 128, 2028–87.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, M. A. (2018) Entrevista con Sonia Corrêa. Significante vacío: ideología de género, conceptualizaciones y estrategias. Observatorio Latinoamericano y Caribeño 2(1), 106–13.Google Scholar

Hilson, C. (2002) New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity. Journal of European Public Policy 9(2), 238–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Htun, M. (2003) Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klarman, M. (2013) From the Closet to the Altar: Courts, Backlash, and the Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lamas, M. (2003) La lucha por modificar las leyes de aborto en México. In Castañeda, M., ed., Interrupción voluntaria del embarazo: Reflexiones teóricas, filosóficas y políticas. Ciudad de México: CEICH, UNAM – Plaza y Valdés, pp. 83–105.Google Scholar

Lamas, M., & Bissell, S. (2000) Abortion and Politics in Mexico: Context Is All. Reproductive Health Matters 8(16), 10–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lemaitre, J. (2012). By Reason Alone: Catholicism, Constitutions, and Sex in the Americas. International Journal of Constitutional Law 10(2), 493–511.Google Scholar

Limongi, F. (2015) O passaporte de cunha e o impeachment a crônica de uma tragédia anunciada. Novos estudos CEBRAP 103: 99–112.Google Scholar

Löfgren, S. (2008) Framing and Shaming. Transnational Networks and the Decriminalization of Abortion in Colombia. Master’s dissertation, Goteborgs University. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/17861/1/gupea_2077_17861_1.pdf Google Scholar

Mazo, S. (2006) A propósito de los fundamentalismos en Colombia. In Defensa de los Derechos Sexuales en Contextos Fundamentalistas. Córdoba: Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, pp. 78–84.Google Scholar

McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1996) Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes. In McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M., eds., Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Meyer, D. & Staggenborg, S. (1996) Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology 101(6), 1628–60.CrossRef Google Scholar

Miguel, L. F., Biroli, F., & Mariano, R. (2017) O direito ao aborto no debate legislativo brasileiro: a ofensiva conservadora na Câmara dos Deputados. Opinião Pública 23(1), 230–60.Google Scholar

Parra, A. (2010) Sentencia T-388 de 2009: Consolidación del derecho al aborto oportuno y seguro y los esfuerzos para menoscabarlo. In Articulación Regional Feminista, ed., Derechos de las mujeres y discurso jurídico, Bogotá: Humanas Colombia, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar

Pitanguy, J. (2011) Advocacy: um processo histórico. In L. Linhares & J. Pitanguy, O Progresso das Mulheres no Brasil 2003–2010. Rio de Janeiro: CEPIA, ONU Mulheres, pp. 22–56.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. (1999) One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tamés, R., & Andión, X. (2012) Derechos humanos de las mujeres y protección de la vida prenatal en México. Ciudad de México: GIRE.Google Scholar

Tushnet, M. (1999) Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Vaggione, J. M. (2005) Reactive Politicization and Religious Dissidence: The Political Mutations of the Religious. Social Theory and Practice 31(2), 233–55.Google Scholar

Viana, P. (2011) Presentación de Brasil. In Soares, R., ed., Quem controla as mulheres? Direitos reprodutivos e fundamentalismos religiosos na América Latina. São Paulo: Católicas pelo Direito a Decidir, pp. 167–69.Google Scholar

Ardila, Mariana (2019) Director of the Legal Area, Women’s Link Colombia. Bogota, November 29.Google Scholar

Bascary, Lourdes (2010) Member of the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Center for Legal and Social Studies (CELS). Buenos Aires, December 20.Google Scholar

Batista, Jolúzia (2019) Senior Technical Advisor at Centro Feminista de Estudos e Assessoria (CFEMEA). Brasilia, August 23.Google Scholar

Beltrán, Alma, and de León, Fernanda Díaz (2011) Members of the Legal Area of GIRE. Ciudad de México, September 29.Google Scholar

Parcero, Cruz, Antonio, Juan (2011) Professor Institute of Philosophical Research-UNAM. Ciudad de México, September 14.Google Scholar

Cuéllar, Guillermo (2013) Director of Brújula Comunicaciones. Bogotá, February 21.Google Scholar

Díaz, Estela (2013) Gender Secretary, Confederation of Argentine Workers (CTA) and member of the National Campaign for the Right to Legal, Safe and Free Abortion. Buenos Aires, September 12.Google Scholar

Díaz de león, Fernanda (2019) Coordinator of Policy and Advocacy for Ipas Mexico. Ciudad de México, September 25.Google Scholar

Juliá, Silvia (2010) Executive Director at Catholics for Choice Argentina. Córdoba, December 18.Google Scholar

Lamas, Marta (2011) Director of Debate Feminista; ex Director of GIRE. Ciudad de México, September 29.Google Scholar

Martínez, Juliana (2019) Coordinator Mesa por la Vida y la Salud de las Mujeres. Bogotá, November 6.Google Scholar

Mazo, Sandra (2019) Director Catholics for Choice Colombia. Bogotá, November 7.Google Scholar

Mejía, María Consuelo (2017) Director of Catholics for Choice Mexico. Ciudad de México, August 5.Google Scholar

Méndez, Alex Ali (2019) Coordinator of the Case Documentation and Litigation Department at GIRE. Ciudad de México, September 24.Google Scholar

Moneta, Fátima (2019) Member of Catholics for Choice Mexico, Ciudad de México, September 26.Google Scholar

Negrão, Telia (2012) Executive Secretary of the National Feminist Network for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (2006–2012). Porto Alegre, August 8.Google Scholar

Ortiz-Millán, Gustavo (2011) Professor Institute of Philosophical Research-UNAM, member of the College of Bioethics. Ciudad de México, September 26.Google Scholar

Rodrigues, Kauara (2012) Member of CFEMEA (Feminist Centre for Studies and Advisory Services). Brasilia, August 13.Google Scholar

Romero, María Eugenia (2019) Director of Equidad de Género, Familia y Trabajo. Ciudad de México, September 26.Google Scholar

Rondon, Gabriela (2019) Senior Legal Researcher at ANIS. Institute of Bioethics, Human Rights, and Gender. Brasilia, August 30.Google Scholar

Tovar, Ariadna (2013) Senior Lawyer at Women’s Link Worldwide. Bogotá, February 22.Google Scholar