Book contents
- The Law and Practice of Global ICT Standardization
- Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law
- The Law and Practice of Global ICT Standardization
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The Ecosystem of ICT Standardization
- Part II The Law of ICT Standardization
- Part III Governance Architecture and Decision-Making Process of SDOs
- Part IV Due Process in ICT Standardization
- Annex I List of Interviews
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2023
Book contents
- The Law and Practice of Global ICT Standardization
- Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law
- The Law and Practice of Global ICT Standardization
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The Ecosystem of ICT Standardization
- Part II The Law of ICT Standardization
- Part III Governance Architecture and Decision-Making Process of SDOs
- Part IV Due Process in ICT Standardization
- Annex I List of Interviews
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Law and Practice of Global ICT Standardization , pp. 312 - 337Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Primary Sources
Bartosch, A., Braun, J., Koenig, C. and Romes, M. (eds.), EC Competition and Telecommunications Law (The Hague and London: Kluwer Law International, 2009)Google Scholar
Berman, H. J., Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Berman, P. S., Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Bolin, S. (ed.), The Standards Edge: Future Generations (Ann Arbor: Sheridan Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. and Jacobsson, B. (eds.), A World of Standards (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Büthe, T. and Mattli, W., The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Cassese, S., Carotti, B., Casini, L., Macchi, M., MacDonald, E. and Savino, M. (eds.), Global Administrative Law: Cases, Materials, Issues, 2nd ed. (Rome: IRPA/IILJ, 2008)Google Scholar
Contreras, J. L. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law: Competition, Antitrust and Patents (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Contreras, J. L. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law: Further Intersection of Public and Private Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Contreras, J. L. and Jacob, M. (eds.), Patent Pledges: Global Perspectives on Patent Law’s Private Ordering Frontier (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017)Google Scholar
Cornes, R. and Sandler, T., The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, C., Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and Stoneman, P. (eds.), Economic Policy and Technological Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Delimatsis, P. (ed.), The Law, Economics and Politics of International Standardization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delimatsis, P., Bijlmakers, S. and Borowicz, M. K. (eds.), The Evolution of Transnational Rule-makers through Crises (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar
DeNardis, L., The Global War for Internet Governance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
DeNardis, L., The Internet in Everything: Freedom and Security in a World with No Off Switch (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
DeNardis, L. (ed.), Opening Standards: The Global Politics of Interoperability (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Dixit, A., Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Djelic, M. and Sahlin-Andersson, K. (eds.), Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Du, M., The Regulation of Product Standards in World Trade Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020)Google Scholar
Eliantonio, M. and Cauffman, C. (eds.), The Legitimacy of Standardization as a Regulatory Technique in the EU: A Cross-disciplinary and Multi-level Analysis (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020)Google Scholar
Franck, T. M., The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. and Wu, T., Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskic, D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Harcourt, A., Christou, G. and Simpson, S., Global Standard Setting in Internet Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Held, D. and Koenig-Archibugi, M. (eds.), Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance (Oxford: Polity Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Hurrelmann, A., Schneider, S. and Steffek, J. (eds.), Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E.-U. (eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006)Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, B., European Standardization of Services and Its Impact on Private Law: Paradoxes of Convergence (Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2017)Google Scholar
Lundqvist, B., Standardization under EU Competition Rules and US Antitrust Laws: The Rise and Limits of Self-Regulation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014)Google Scholar
Mataija, M., Private Regulation and the Internal Market: Sports, Legal Services and Standard Setting in EU Economic Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar
Matsushita, M., Schoenenbaum, T. J. and Mavroidis, P. C., The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford: Oxford International Law Library, 2015)Google Scholar
Mattli, W. and Woods, N. (eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, C. and Yates, J., The International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Global Governance through Voluntary Consensus (London: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar
Olson, M., The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965)Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Parker, C., Scott, C., Lacey, N. and Braithwaite, J. (eds.), Regulating Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Peters, A., Koechlin, L., Foester, T. and Fenner Zinkernagel, G. (eds.), Non-State Actors as Standard Setters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Robert, H. M. and Robert, S. C., Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised, 11th ed. (Boston: Da Capo Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of Innovations: Modifications of a Model for Telecommunications (New York: The Free Press New York, 1995)Google Scholar
Russel, A. L., Open Standards and the Digital Age: History, Ideology, and Networks (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Scharpf, F., Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Schepel, H., The Constitution of Private Governance: Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets (Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar
Schneiderman, R., Modern Standardization: Case Studies at the Crossroads of Technology, Economics and Politics, Standards Information Network (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2015)Google Scholar
Scholte, J. A. (ed.), Building Global Democracy: Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Shapiro, C. and Varian, H. W., Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Ullrich, H., Hilty, R. M., Lamping, M. and Drexl, J. (eds.), TRIPS plus 20. From Trade Rules to Market Principles MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law (New York: Springer, 2016)Google Scholar
Weiss, T. G. and Thakur, R., The UN and Global Governance: An Unfinished Journey (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Wijckmans, F. and Tuytschaever, F., Vertical Agreements in EU Competition Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Yates, J. and Murphy, C. N., Engineering Rules: Global Standard Setting since 1880 (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Yin, R. K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed. (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2003)Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
van Aaken, A. and Chambers, R., ‘The accountability and independence of international election observers’ (2009) 6 International Organizations Law Review 541–80Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D., ‘Hard and soft law in international governance’ (2000) 54 International organizations 421–56Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D., ‘International “standards” and international governance’ (2011) 8 Journal of European Public Policy 345–70Google Scholar
Alchian, A. A. and Demsetz, H., ‘Production, information costs and economic organizations’ (1972) 62 American Economic Review 777–95Google Scholar
An, B., ‘Intellectual property rights in information and communications technology standardization: highly profiled disputes and collaboration potentials between the United States and China’ (2009) 45 Texas International Law Journal 175–99Google Scholar
Austin, M. T. and Milner, H. V., ‘Strategies of European standardization’ (2001) 8 Journal of European Public Policy 411–31Google Scholar
Baron, J. and Gupta, K., ‘Unpacking 3GPP standards’ (2018) 27 Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 433–61Google Scholar
Baron, J. and Larouche, P., ‘Antitrust and balance of interests in standards development: lessons from NSS Labs. v. Symantec’ (September 2019) 2 Competition Policy International 2–10Google Scholar
Baron, J., Ménière, Y. and Pohlmann, T., ‘Standards, consortia and innovation’ (2014) 36 International Journal of Industrial Organization 22–35Google Scholar
Baron, J. A. and Pohlmann, T., ‘Who cooperates in standards consortia: rivals or complementors?’ (2013) 9 Journal of Competition Law and Economics 905–29Google Scholar
Bartley, T., ‘Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions’ (2009) 113 American Journal of Sociology 297–351Google Scholar
Bekkers, R., Duysters, G. and Verspagen, B., ‘Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure: the case of GSM’ (2002) 31 Research Policy 1141–61Google Scholar
Benvenisti, E., ‘The interplay between actors as determinant of the evolution of administrative law in international institutions’ (2005) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 319–40Google Scholar
Berger, T., ‘Balancing barriers to trade and technical standards: potential impact on ICT industries’ (2015) 17 International Trade and Business Law Review 315Google Scholar
Bernstein, L., ‘Opting out of the legal system: extralegal contractual relations in the diamond industry’ (1992) 21 Journal of Legal Studies 115–57Google Scholar
Bernstein, L., ‘Private commercial law in the cotton industry: creating cooperation through rules, norms and institutions’ (2001) 99 Michigan Law Review 1724–90Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. and Hannah, E., ‘Non-state global standard-setting and the WTO: legitimacy and the need for regulatory space’ (2008) 11 Journal of International Economic Law 575–608Google Scholar
Bexell, M., ‘Global governance, legitimacy and (de-)legitimation’ (2014) 11 Globalization 289–99Google Scholar
Biddle, B., Curci, F. X., Haslach, T. F., Marchant, G. E., Askland, A. and Gaudet, L., ‘The expanding role and importance of standards in the information and communications technology industry’ (2012) 52 Jurimetrics 177–208Google Scholar
Blind, K. and Gauch, S., ‘Trends in ICT standards in European standardization bodies and standards consortia’ (2008) 32 Telecommunications Policy 503–13Google Scholar
Bodansky, D., ‘The legitimacy of international governance: a coming challenge for international environmental law?’ (1999) 93 American Journal of International Law 596–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borghetti, J. S. Nikolic, I. and Petit, N., ‘FRAND licensing levels under EU law’ (2021) 17 European Competition Journal 205–68Google Scholar
Boström, M. and Tamm Hallström, K., ‘Global multi-stakeholder standard setters: how fragile are they?’ (2013) 9 Journal of Global Ethics 93–110Google Scholar
Boström, M. and Tamm Hallström, K., ‘NGO power in global social and environmental standard-setting’ (2010) 10 Global Environmental Politics 36–59Google Scholar
Botzem, S. and Dobusch, L., ‘Standardization cycles: a process perspective on the formation and diffusion of transnational standards’ (2012) 33 Organizational Studies 735–60Google Scholar
Bovens, M., ‘Analysing and accessing accountability: a conceptual framework’ (2007) 13 European Law Review 447–68Google Scholar
Bovens, M., Schillemans, T. and ’t Hart, P., ‘Does public accountability work? an assessment tool’ (2008) 86 Public Administration 225–42Google Scholar
Bremer, E. S., ‘American and European perspectives on private standards in public law’ (2016) 91 Tulane Law Review 325–70Google Scholar
Bremer, E. S., ‘On the costs of private standards in public law’ (2015) 61 Kansas Law Review 279–333Google Scholar
Brunsson, N., Rasche, A. and Seidl, D., ‘The dynamics of standardization: three perspectives on standards in organization studies’ (2012) 33 Organizational Studies 613–32Google Scholar
Buchannan, A. and Keohane, R. O., ‘The legitimacy of global governance institutions’ (2006) 20 Ethics and International Affairs 405–37Google Scholar
Buratti, C., Conti, A., Dardari, D. and Verdone, R., ‘An overview on wireless sensor networks technology and evolution’ (2009) 9 Sensors 6869–96Google Scholar
Burk, D. L. and Gillespie, T. L., ‘Autonomy and morality in DRM and anti-circumvention law’ (2006) 4 TripleC 239–4Google Scholar
Büthe, T., ‘Engineering uncontestedness? The origins and institutional development of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)’ (2010) 12 Business and Politics 1–62Google Scholar
Büthe, T., ‘The globalization of health and safety standards: delegation of regulatory authority in the SPS Agreement of 1994 Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization’ (2008) 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 219–55Google Scholar
Cabral, L. and Salant, D., ‘Evolving technologies and standards regulation’ (2014) 36 International Journal of Industrial Organization 48–56Google Scholar
Cafaggi, F., ‘The many features of transnational private rule-making: unexplored relationships between custom, jura mercatorum and global private regulation’ (2015) 36 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 875–938Google Scholar
Cafaggi, F., ‘New foundations of transnational private regulation’ (2011) 38 Journal of Law and Society 20–49Google Scholar
Cafaggi, F. and Janczuk, A., ‘Private regulation and legal integration: the European example’ (2010) 12 Business and Politics (3), 1–40Google Scholar
Callies, G. P. and Renner, M., ‘Between law and social norms: the evolution of global governance’ (2009) 22 Ratio Juris 260–80Google Scholar
Cannataci, J. A. and Bonnici, J. P. M., ‘Can self-regulation satisfy the transnational requisite of successful internet regulation?’ (2010) 17 International Review of Law Computers & Technology 51–61Google Scholar
Cantero Gamito, M., ‘Europeanization through standardization: ICT and telecommunications’ (2018) 37 Yearbook of European Law 395–423Google Scholar
Cassese, S., ‘Administrative law without the state? The challenge of global regulation’ (2005) 37 N.Y.U. International Law and Politics 663–94Google Scholar
Cath, C. and Floridi, L., ‘The design of internet architecture by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and human rights’ (2017) 23 Science and Engineering Ethics 449–68Google Scholar
Chappatte, P., ‘FRAND Commitments: the case for antitrust intervention’ (2009) 5 European Competition Journal 319–46Google Scholar
Chiao, B., Lerner, J. and Tirole, J., ‘The rules of standard-setting organizations: an empirical analysis’ (2007) 38 The RAND Journal of Economics 905–30Google Scholar
Clark, I., ‘Legitimacy in a global order’ (2003) 29 Review of International Studies 75–95Google Scholar
Conde Gallego, B. and Drexl, J., ‘IoT connectivity standards: how adaptive is the current SEP regulatory framework?’ (2019) 50 IIC – International Review of Intellectual Propertly and Competition Law 135–56Google Scholar
Contreras, J. L., ‘Divergent patterns of engagement in internet standardization: Japan, Korea and China’ (2014) 38 Telecommunications Policy 916–34Google Scholar
Contreras, J. L., ‘From private ordering to public law: the legal frameworks governing Standards-Essential Patents’ (2017) 30 Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 211–31Google Scholar
Contreras, J. L., ‘A tale of two layers: patents, standardization and the internet’ (2016) 93 Denver Law Review 853–95Google Scholar
Contreras, J. L., ‘Understanding “balance” requirement for standards-development organizations’ (2019) 2 CPI Antitrust Chronicle 1–16Google Scholar
Cunningham, L. A., ‘Private standards in public law: copyright, lawmaking and the case of accounting’ (2005) 104 Michigan Law Review 291–344Google Scholar
Curran, P., ‘Standard-setting organizations: patents, price fixing, and per se legality’ (2003) 70 The University of Chicago Law Review 983–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusumano, M. A., Mylonadis, Y. and Rosenbloom, R. S., ‘Strategic maneuvering and mass-market dynamics: the triumph of VHS over beta’ (1992) 66 Business History Review 51–94Google Scholar
Cutler, A. C., ‘The legitimacy of private transnational governance: experts and the transnational market for force’ (2010) 8 Socio-Economic Review 157–85Google Scholar
Daubs, M. S., ‘HTML5, Digital Rights Management (DRM) and the rhetoric of openness’ (2017) 3 Journal of Media Critiques 77–94Google Scholar
David, P. A. and Greenstein, S., ‘The economics of compatibility standards: an introduction to recent research’ (1990) 1 Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3–41Google Scholar
David, P. A. and Shurmer, M., ‘Formal standard-setting for global telecommunications and information services: towards an institutional regime transformation?’ (1996) 20 Telecommunications Policy 789–815Google Scholar
De Vries, H., ‘Standardization – what’s in a name?’ (1997) 4 Terminology – International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 55–83Google Scholar
Delcamp, H. R. and Leiponen, A., ‘Innovating standards through informal consortia: the case of wireless telecommunications’ (2014) 36 International Journal of Industrial Organization 36–47Google Scholar
Delimatsis, P., ‘The future of transnational self-regulation enforcement and compliance in professional services’ (2017) 40 Hasting International and Comparative Law Review 1–67Google Scholar
Delimatsis, P., ‘Global standard-setting 2.0: how the WTO spotlights ISO and impacts the transnational standard-setting process’ (2018) 28 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 273–326Google Scholar
Delimatsis, P., Kanevskaia, O. and Verghese, Z. G., ‘Strategic behaviour in standards development organizations in times of crisis’ (2021) 2 Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal 127–85Google Scholar
Dimitriou, N., Sarakis, L., Loukatos, D., Kormentzas, G. and Skianis, C., ‘Vertical Handover (VHO) framework for future collaborative wireless networks’ (2011) 21 International Journal of Network Management 548–64Google Scholar
Dixit, A., ‘Governance institutions and economic activity’ (2009) 99 American Economic Review 5–24Google Scholar
Dixit, A., ‘Trade expansion and contract enforcement’ (2003) 111 Journal of Political Economy 1293–317Google Scholar
Dolmans, M., ‘Standards for standards’ (2002) 26 Fordham International Law Journal 163–208Google Scholar
Du, D. and Deng, F., ‘International standards as global public goods in the world trading system’ (2016) 43 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 113–44Google Scholar
Eliantonio, M. and Medzmariashvili, M., ‘Hybridity under scrutiny: how European standardization shakes the foundations of EU constitutional and internal market law’ (2017) 44 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 323–35Google Scholar
van den Ende, J., Van den Kaa, G., Den Uijl, S. and De Vries, H. J., ‘The paradox of standard flexibility: the effects of co-evolution between standard and interorganizational network’ (2012) 33 Organization Studies 705–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erie, M. E. and Streinz, T. ‘The Beijing effect: China’s “Digital Silk Road” as transnational data governance’ (2021) 54 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 1–92Google Scholar
Erman, E., ‘Global political legitimacy beyond justice and democracy?’ (2016) 8 International Theory 29–62Google Scholar
Farina, E. M. M. Q., Gutman, G. E., Lavarello, P. J., Nunes, R. and Reardon, T., ‘Private and public milk standards in Argentina and Brazil’ (2005) 30 Food Policy 302–15Google Scholar
Farrell, J. and Saloner, G., ‘Coordination through committees and markets’ (1998) 19 The RAND Journal of Economics 235–52Google Scholar
Farrell, J., Hayes, J., Shapiro, C. and Sullivan, T., ‘Standard setting, patents, and hold-up’ (2007) 74 Antitrust Law Review 603–70Google Scholar
Fisher, E., ‘Transparency and administrative law: a critical evolution’ (2010) 63 Current Legal Problems 272–314Google Scholar
Fontanelli, F., ‘ISO and Codex standards and international trade law: what gets said is not what’s heard’ (2011) 60 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 895–932Google Scholar
Fuentelsaz, L., Maicas, J. P. and Polo, Y., ‘Switching costs, network effects, and competition in the European mobile telecommunications industry’ (2012) 23 Information Systems Research 93–108Google Scholar
Funk, J. L. and Methe, D. T., ‘Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication’ (2001) 30 Research Policy 589–610Google Scholar
Gandal, N. Salant, D. and Waverman, L., ‘Standards in wireless telephone networks’ (2003) 27 Telecommunications Policy 325–32Google Scholar
Garud, R. and Kumaraswamy, A., ‘Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: an exploration of Sun Microsystems’ open systems strategy’ (1993) 14 Strategic Management 351–69Google Scholar
Geradin, D., ‘The European Commission policy towards the licensing of standard-essential patents: where do we stand?’ (2013) 9 Journal of Competition Law and Economics 1125–45Google Scholar
van Gestel, R. and Micklitz, H., ‘European integration through standardization: how judicial review is breaking down the club house of private standardization bodies’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review 145–81Google Scholar
Gibson, C. S., ‘Globalization and technology standards game: balancing concerns of protectionism and intellectual property in international standards’ (2007) 22 Berkley Technology Law Review 1403–84Google Scholar
Ginsburg, D. H., Owings, T. M. and Wright, J. D., ‘Enjoining injunctions: the case against antitrust liability for standard essential patent holders who seek injunctions’ (2014) 14 The Antitrust Source 1–7Google Scholar
Goerke, L. and Holler, M., ‘Strategic standardization in Europe: a public choice perspective’ (1998) 6 European Journal of Law and Economics 95–112Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E., ‘Enfranchising all affected interests and its alternatives’ (2007) 35 Philosophy and Public Affairs 40–68Google Scholar
Grant, R. W. and Keohane, R. O., ‘Accountability and abuses of power in world politics’ (2005) 99 American Political Science Review 29–43Google Scholar
Greif, A., Milgrom, P. and Weingast, B., ‘Coordination, commitment and enforcement: the case of the merchant guild’ (1994) 102 The Journal of Political Economy 745–76Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, L. H., ‘Accountability arrangements in non-state standards organizations: instrumental design and imitation’ (2008) 15 Organization 563–83Google Scholar
Gunningham, N. and Rees, J., ‘Industry self-regulation: an institutional perspective’ (1997) 19 Law and Policy 363–414Google Scholar
Gupta, K., ‘The patent policy debate in a high-tech world’ (2013) 9 Journal of Competition Law and Economics 827–58Google Scholar
Gupta, K. and Effraimidis, G., ‘IEEE patent policy revisions: an empirical examination of impact’ (2019) 64 The Antitrust Bulletin 151–71Google Scholar
Hadfield, G. K. and Weingast, B. R., ‘What is law? A coordination model of the characteristics of legal order’ (2012) 4 Journal of Legal Analysis 471–514Google Scholar
Harlow, C., ‘Global administrative law: the quest for principles and values’ (2006) 17 The European Journal of International Law 187–214Google Scholar
Hart, O., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., ‘The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prisons’ (1997) 112 Quarterly Journal of Economics 1127–61Google Scholar
Héritier, A. and Eckert, S., ‘New modes of governance in the shadow of hierarchy: self-regulation by industry in Europe’ (2007) 28 Journal of Public Policy 113–38Google Scholar
Hettne, J., ‘Standards, barriers to trade and EU internal market rules: need for a renewed approach?’ (2017) 44 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 409–20Google Scholar
Hinricher, J., ‘The law-making of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU): providing a new source of international law?’ (2004) 64 ZaöR 489–501Google Scholar
Hoffinger, R., ‘The 2015 DOJ IEEE business review letter: the triumph of industrial policy preferences over law and evidence’ (2015) 3 CPI Antitrust Chronicle 1–24Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S., Lazanski, D. and Taylor, E., ‘Standardising the splinternet: how China’s technical standards could fragment the Internet’ (2020) 5 Journal of Cyber Policy 239–64Google Scholar
Homiller, D., ‘Patent misuse in patent pool licensing: from national harrow to “the nine no-nos” to not likely’ (2006) 5 Duke Law and Technology Review 1–21Google Scholar
Howse, R. and Teitel, R., ‘Beyond compliance: rethinking why international law really matters’ (2010) 1 Global Policy 127–36Google Scholar
Hurd, I., ‘Legitimacy and authority in international politics’ (1999) 53 International Organization 379–408Google Scholar
Hurrell, A., ‘Legitimacy and the use of force: can the circle be squared?’ (2005) 31 Review of International Studies 15–32Google Scholar
Jakobsen, K. A., ‘Revisiting standard-setting organizations’ patent policies’ (2004) 3 Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 43–60Google Scholar
Kallestrup, M., ‘Stakeholder participation in European standardization: a mapping and an assessment of three categories of regulation’ (2017) 44 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 381–94Google Scholar
Kanevskaia, O., ‘ICT standards bodies and international trade: what role for the WTO’ (2022) 56(3) Journal of World Trade 429–52Google Scholar
Kappos, D. and (The Honorable) Michel, P. R., ‘The smallest salable patent-practicing unit: observations on its origins, development, and future’ (2018) 32 Berkley Technology Law Journal 1433–56Google Scholar
Karachalios, K., ‘Fundamental uncertainty at the intersection between patents and standards’ (November/December 2015) The Patent Lawyer 33–5Google Scholar
Keil, T., ‘De facto standardization through alliances: lessons from Bluetooth’ (2002) 26 Telecommunications Policy 205–13Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P., ‘Standards as public, collective and private goods’ (1983) 36 Kyklos 377–96Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B., ‘Infrastructure and InfraReg: on rousing the international law “Wizards of Is”’ (2019) 8 Cambridge International Law Journal 171–86Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N. and Stewart, R. B., ‘The emergence of global administrative law’ (2005) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 15–61Google Scholar
Koenig-Archibugi, M., ‘How to diagnose democratic deficits in global politics: the use of the “all-affected” principle’ (2017) 9 International Theory 171–202Google Scholar
Lane, C., ‘The social regulation of inter-firm relations in Britain and Germany: market rules, legal norms and technical standards’ (1997) 21 Cambridge Journal of Economics 197–215Google Scholar
Larouche, P. and Schuett, F., ‘Repeated interactions in standard setting’ (2018) 28 Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 488–509Google Scholar
Larrain Aylwin, M. and Prüfer, J., ‘Trade associations, lobbying and endogenous institutions’ (2015) 7 Journal of Legal Analysis 467–516Google Scholar
Layne-Farrar, A. and Stark, R., ‘License to all or access to all? A law and economics assessment of standard development organizations’ licensing rules’ (2020) 88 George Washington Law Review 1307–49Google Scholar
Layne-Farrar, A., Llobet, G. and Padilla, J., ‘Payment and participation: the incentive to join cooperating standard setting efforts’ (2014) 23 Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 24–49Google Scholar
Lazanski, D., ‘Governance in international technical standards making: a tripartite model’ (2019) 4 Journal of Cyber Policy 362–79Google Scholar
Lee, J., ‘Implementing the FRAND standard in China’ (2016) 19 Venderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law 37–85Google Scholar
Leiponen, A., ‘Competing through cooperation: the organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications’ (2008) 54 Management Science 1904–19Google Scholar
Lemley, M. A., ‘Intellectual property rights and standard-setting organizations’ (2002) 90 California Law Review 1889–980Google Scholar
Lemley, M.A. and Shapiro, C. ‘Patent holdup and royalty stacking’ (2007) 85 Texas Law Review 1991–2049Google Scholar
Lerner, J. and Tirole, J., ‘A model of forum shopping’ (2006) 96 American Economic Review 1091–113Google Scholar
Lerner, J. and Tirole, J., ‘Standard-essential patents’ (2015) 123 Journal of Political Economy 547–86Google Scholar
Lindsay, M. A. and Karachalios, K., ‘Updating a patent policy: the IEE experience’ (2015) 3 CPI Antitrust Chronicle 1–6Google Scholar
Liu, H. W., ‘International standards in flux: a Balkanized ICT standard-setting paradigm and its implications for the WTO’ (2014) 13 Journal of International Economic Law 551–600Google Scholar
Lundqvist, B., ‘European harmonized standards as “part of EU law”: the implications of the James Elliott case for copyright protection and, possibly, for EU competition law’ (2017) 44 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 421–36Google Scholar
Markus, M. L., Steinfield, C. W. and Wigard, R. T. ‘Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: the case of the U.S. residential mortgage industry’ (2006) 30 MIS Quarterly 439–65Google Scholar
Masten, S. E. and Prüfer, J., ‘On the evolution of collective enforcement institutions: communities and courts’ (2014) 43 Journal of Legal Studies 359–400Google Scholar
Mataija, M., ‘Leveraging trade law for governance reform: the impact of the WTO agreement on technical barriers to trade on private standard-setting’ (2019) 2 European Review of Private Law 293–318Google Scholar
Matsushita, M., ‘The structural impediments initiative: an example of bilateral trade negotiation’ (1991) 12 Michigan Journal of International Law 436–49Google Scholar
Mattli, W. and Büthe, T., ‘Setting international standards: technological rationality or primacy of power’ (2003) 56 World Politics 1–42Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. C., ‘Last mile for tuna (to a safe harbour): what is the TBT Agreement all about?’ (2019) 30 The European Journal of International Law 279–301Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. C. and Wolfe, R., ‘Private standards and the WTO: reclusive no more’ (2017) 16 World Trade Review 1–24Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, R. and Nelson, R. R., ‘The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate’ (1998) 27 Research Policy 273–84Google Scholar
McRae, D., ‘Measuring the effectiveness of WTO dispute settlement system’ (2008) 3 Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy 1–20Google Scholar
Medzmariashvili, M., ‘Delegation of rulemaking power to European standards organizations: reconsidered’ (2017) 44 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 353–66Google Scholar
Meidinger, E., ‘Administrative law of global private–public regulation: the case of forestry’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 47–87Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B., ‘Institutional organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony’ (1977) 83 American Journal of Sociology 340–63Google Scholar
Milgrom, P., North, D. C. and Weingast, B. R., ‘The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs’ (199) 2 Economics and Politics 1–23Google Scholar
Moravczik, A., ‘Is there a “democratic deficit” in world politics? a framework for analysis’ (2004) 39 Government and Opposition 336–63Google Scholar
Muir, A., ‘The race to safety: how private lawmaking and voluntary-standard adoption can inspire a global regime that strengthens and harmonizes product safety standards’ (2016) 23 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 323–47Google Scholar
Mulgan, R., ‘Accountability: an ever-expanding concept?’ (2000) 78 Public Administration 555–73Google Scholar
Murphree, M. and Breznitz, D., ‘Indigenous digital technology standards for development: the case of China’ (2018) 1 Journal of International Business Policy 234–52Google Scholar
Nanni, R., ‘The “China” question in mobile Internet standard-making: insights from expert interviews’ (2021) 45 Telecommunications Policy 1–12Google Scholar
Nanz, P. and Steffek, J. ‘Global governance, participation and the public sphere’ (2004) 39 Government and Opposition 314–35Google Scholar
Nadvi, K., ‘Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains’ (2008) 8 Journal of Economic Geography 323–43Google Scholar
Negus, K. J. and Petrick, A., ‘History of wireless local area networks (WLANs) in the unlicensed band’ (2009) 11 info 36–56Google Scholar
Nickerson, J. F. and zur Muelen, M., ‘The ecology of standards processes: insights from internet standards making’ (2006) 20 MIS Quarterly, Special Issue on Standards Making 467–88Google Scholar
Noel, M. and Schankerman, M., ‘Strategic patenting and software innovation’ (2013) 61 The Journal of Industrial Economics 481–520Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, P. A. and Curtin, D., ‘Conceptualizing accountability in international and European law’ (2007) 36 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 3–20Google Scholar
Okediji, R., ‘Legal innovation in international intellectual property relations: revisiting twenty-one years of the TRIPS agreement’ (2014) 36 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 191Google Scholar
O’Neill, K., Balsiger, J. and VanDeveer, S. D., ‘Actors, norms, and impact: recent international cooperation theory and the influence of the agent-structure debate’ (2004) 7 Annual Review of Political Science 149–75Google Scholar
Oshri, I. and Weeber, C., ‘Cooperation and competition standard-setting activities in the digitalized era: the case of wireless information devices’ (2006) 18 Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 265–83Google Scholar
Park, S., ‘Quantitative analysis of network externalities in competing technologies: the VCR case’ (2004) 86 The Review of Economics and Statistics 937–45Google Scholar
Partiti, E., ‘What use of an unloaded gun? The substantive discipline of the WTO TBT code of good practice and its application to private standards pursuing public objectives’ (2017) 20 Journal of International Economic Law 829–54Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. A. and Wouters, J., ‘When structures become shackles: stagnation and dynamics in international law-making’ (2014) 25 The European Journal of International Law 733–63Google Scholar
Pelkmans, J., ‘The new approach to technical harmonization and standardization’ (1987) XXV Journal of Common Market Studies (3), 249–69Google Scholar
Petit, N., ‘The IEEE-SA revised patent policy and its definition of “reasonable” rates: a transatlantic antitrust divide?’ (2017) 27 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 211–51Google Scholar
Petit, N., ‘Injunctions for FRAND-pledged SEPs: the quest for an appropriate test of abuse under Art. 102 TFEU’ (2017) 9 European Competition Journal 677–719Google Scholar
Pohlmann, T., ‘The evolution of ICT standards consortia’ (2014) 93 Digiworld Economic Journal 17–40Google Scholar
Pusceddu, P., ‘Hic sunt dracones? Mapping the legal framework of China’s innovation policy: standardization and IPRs’ (2020) 51 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 559–93Google Scholar
Ragavan, S., Murphy, B. and Dave, R., ‘FRAND v. compulsory licensing: the lesser of the two evils’ (2016) 14 Duke Law & Technology Review 83–120Google Scholar
Rubin, J. L., ‘Patents, antitrust and rivalry in standard-setting’ (2007) 38 Rutgers Law Journal 509–38Google Scholar
Russel, A., ‘“Rough consensus and running code” and the internet-OSI standard wars’ (2006) 28 IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 48–61Google Scholar
Rysman, M. and Simcoe, T., ‘Patents and the performance of voluntary standard-setting organizations’ (2008) 54 Management Science 1920–34Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A., ‘The pure theory of public expenditures’ (1954) 36 The Review of Economics and Statistics 387–9Google Scholar
Schepel, H., ‘New approach to new approach: the juridification of harmonized standards in EU law’ (2013) 12 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 521–33Google Scholar
Schmidt, V., ‘Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: input, output and “throughput”’ (2013) 61 Political Studies 2–22Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. and Wood, M., ‘Conceptualizing throughput legitimacy: procedural mechanisms of accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness in EU governance’ (2019) 97 Public Administration 727–40Google Scholar
Scott, C., Cafaggi, F. and Senden, L., ‘The conceptual and constitutional challenge of transnational private regulation’ (2011) 38 Journal of Law and Society 1–19Google Scholar
Senden, L., ‘The constitutional fit of european standardization put to the test’ (2017) 44 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 337–52Google Scholar
Shanin, J., ‘The European Union’s performance in the International Telecommunications Union’ (2011) 33 Journal of European Integration 683–98Google Scholar
Shapiro, C., ‘Navigating the patent thicket: cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting’ (2001) 1 Innovation Policy and the Economy 119–50Google Scholar
Shapiro, C. and Lemley, M., ‘The role of antitrust in preventing patent holdup’ (2020) 168 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2019–63Google Scholar
Shapiro, M., ‘“Deliberative,” “independent” technocracy v. democratic politics: will the globe echo the EU?’ (2005) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 341–56Google Scholar
Sheremata, W. A., ‘Competing through innovation in network markets: strategies for challengers’ (2004) 29 The Academy of Management Review 359–77Google Scholar
Sidak, J. G., ‘The antitrust division’s devaluation of standard-essential patents’ (2015) 48 The Georgetown Law Journal Online 48–73Google Scholar
Simcoe, T., ‘Standard setting committees: consensus governance for shared technology platforms’ (2012) 102 American Economic Review 305–36Google Scholar
Smith, H. E., ‘Property as platform: coordinating standards as technological innovation’ (2013) 9 Journal of Competition Law and Economics 1057–89Google Scholar
Spulber, D. F., ‘Innovation economics: the interplay among technology standards, competitive conduct, and economic performance’ (2013) 9 Journal of Competition Law and Economics 777–825Google Scholar
Staiger, R. W. and Sykes, A., ‘International trade, national treatment and domestic regulation’ (2011) 40 Journal of Legal Studies 149–203Google Scholar
Stasavage, D., ‘Open-door or closed-door? transparency in domestic and international bargaining’ (2004) 58 International Organization 667–703Google Scholar
Steffek, J., ‘Discursive legitimation in environmental governance’ (2009) 11 Forest Policy and Economics 313–18Google Scholar
Steffek, J., ‘The output legitimacy of international organizations and the global public interest’ (2015) 7 International Theory 263–93Google Scholar
Stewart, R. B., ‘Remedying disregard in global regulatory governance: accountability, participation and responsiveness’ (2014) 108 The American Journal of International Law 211–70Google Scholar
Stringham, E., ‘The extralegal development of securities trading in seventeenth-century Amsterdam’ (2003) 43 The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 321–44Google Scholar
Sun, N., ‘Piercing the veil of national security: does China’s banking IT security regulation violate the TBT agreement’ (2016) 11 Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy 395–436Google Scholar
Swinnen, J. and Vandermoortele, T., ‘Trade and the political economy of standards’ (2012) 11 World Trade Review 390–400Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O., ‘Regulatory consistency requirements in international trade’ (2017) 49 Arizona State Law Journal 821–66Google Scholar
Teubner, L. K., Henkel, J. and Bekkers, R., ‘Industry consortia in mobile telecommunications standards setting: purpose, organization and diversity’ (2021) 45 Telecommunications Policy 1–20Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P., ‘Toward open recognition? Standardization and regional integration under Article XXIV of GATT’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law 459–92Google Scholar
Trubek, D. M., ‘The political economy of the rule of law: the challenge of the new developmental state’ (2009) 1 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 28–32Google Scholar
Tsang, K. F. and Lee, J. A., ‘Unfriendly choice of law in FRAND’ (2019) 59 Virginia Journal of International Law 220–305Google Scholar
Tushman, M. and Rosenkopf, L., ‘Organizational determinants of technological change: towards a sociology of technological evolution’ (1992) 14 Research in Organizational Behaviour 311–47Google Scholar
Ullrich, H., ‘Expansionist intellectual property protection and reductionist competition rules: a TRIPS perspective’ (2004) 7 Journal of International Economic Law 401–30Google Scholar
Verbruggen, P., ‘Good governance of private standardization and the role of tort law’ (2019) 2 European Review of Private Law 319–52Google Scholar
Verbruggen, P., ‘Introduction: regulating private regulators: understanding the role of private law’ (2019) 2 European Review of Private Law 175–96Google Scholar
Verbruggen, P. and van Leeuwen, B., ‘The liability of notified bodies under the EU’s new approach’ (2018) 43 European Law Review (3), 394–498Google Scholar
Vincent, C. and Camp, J., ‘Looking to the internet for models of governance’ (2004) 6 Ethics and Information Technology 161–73Google Scholar
Volpato, A., ‘Harmonised standards before the ECJ: James Elliott Construction’ (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 591–603Google Scholar
Weiser, P. J., ‘Internet governance, standard setting and self-regulation’ (2001) 28 Northern Kentucky Law Review 822–46Google Scholar
Weiss, M. and Sirbu, M., ‘Technological choice in voluntary standards committees: an empirical analysis’ (1990) 1 Economics of Innovation and New Technologies 111–33Google Scholar
Weitzel, T., Beimborn, D. and König, W., ‘A unified economic model of standard diffusion: the impact of standardization cost, network effects, and network topology’ (2006) 30 MIS Quarterly 489–514Google Scholar
Werle, R., ‘Institutional aspects of standardization – jurisdictional conflicts and the choice of standardization organizations’ (2001) 8 Journal of European Public Policy 392–410Google Scholar
Werle, R. and Iversen, E.J., ‘Promoting legitimacy in technical standardization’ (2006) 2 Science, Technology and Innovation Studies 19–39Google Scholar
Wiegmann, P., Blind, K. and De Vries, H., ‘Multi-mode standardization: a critical review and a research agenda’ (2017) 46 Research Policy 1370–86Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E., ‘Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations’ (1979) 22 The Journal of Law and Economics 233–61Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E., ‘The economics of governance’ (2005) 95 American Economic Review 1–18Google Scholar
Wouters, J. and Geraets, D., ‘Private food standards and the World Trade Organization: some legal considerations’ (2012) 11 World Trade Review 479–89Google Scholar
Zingales, N. and Kanevskaia, O., ‘The IEEE-SA patent policy update under the lens of EU competition law’ (2016) 12 European Competition Journal 195–235Google Scholar
van der Zee, E., ‘Disciplining private standards under the SPS and TBT agreement: a plea for market-state procedural guidelines’ (2018) 52 Journal of World Trade 393–414Google Scholar
Baron, J. and Kanevskaia, O., ‘Global competition for leadership positions in standards development organizations” (March 2021)Google Scholar
Baron, J. and Pohlmann, T., ‘Mapping standards to patents using databases of declared standard-essential patents and systems of technological classification’ (2015)Google Scholar
Bekkers, R. and West, J., ‘IPR standardization policies and strategic patenting in UMTS’ (2008) in Proceedings of 25th DRUID Celebration Conference, Copenhagen, June 17–20, 2008Google Scholar
Besheim, M. and Dingwerth, S., ‘Procedural legitimacy and private transnational governance: are the good ones doing better?’ (June 2008) SFB-Governance Working Paper Series No. 14Google Scholar
Biddle, B., White, A. and Woods, S., ‘How many standards in a laptop? (and other empirical questions)’ (2010) in Proceedings from K-2010: ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference – Beyond the Internet? Innovations and for Future Networks and Services, Pune, India, December 13–15, 2010Google Scholar
Black, J., ‘Calling regulators to account: challenges, capacities and prospects’ (2012) LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 15/2012Google Scholar
Black, J., ‘Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes’ (2008) LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, n. 02-2008Google Scholar
Black, J., ‘Learning from regulatory disasters’ (2014) LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 24/2014Google Scholar
Cafaggi, F., ‘A comparative analysis of transnational private regulation: legitimacy, quality, effectiveness and enforcement’ (2014) EUI Department of Law Research Paper No. 2014/145Google Scholar
Coglianese, A. and Mendelson, E., ‘Meta-regulation and self-regulation’ (2012) U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-11Google Scholar
Contreras, J., ‘Intellectual property pools and aggregation’ (2021) University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 408Google Scholar
Curtin, D. and. Senden, L., ‘Public accountability of transnational private regulation: chimera or reality?’ (2011) Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance Working Paper Series 2011-06Google Scholar
DeLacey, B., Herman, K., Kiron, D. and Lerner, J., ‘Strategic behavior in standard-setting organizations’ (2006) Harvard NOM Working Paper No. 903214Google Scholar
Delimatsis, P., ‘Into the abyss of standard-setting: an analysis of procedural and substantive guarantees within ISO’ (November 2014) TILEC Discussion Paper 0042-2014Google Scholar
Ernst, D., ‘America’s voluntary standards system: a “best practice” model for innovation policy?’ (February 2012) East-West Center Working Paper No. 128Google Scholar
Ernst, D., ‘Indigenous innovation and globalization. The challenge for China’s standardization strategy’ (2011), available at www.eastwestcenter.org/sites/default/files/private/ernstindigenousinnovation.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ernst, D. and Martin, S, ‘Adjusting to the global knowledge economy? Recent developments in China’s WAPI Standard’ (2010) Unpublished manuscript, East-West Center, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Franck, T. M., ‘Democracy, legitimacy and the rule of law: linkages’ (1999) Working Paper 2, New York University School of Law Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers SeriesGoogle Scholar
Geradin, D., Layne-Farrar, A. and Padilla, J., ‘Royalty stacking in high tech industries: separating myth from reality’ (2007) CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP6091Google Scholar
Greenstein, S. M. and Rysman, M., ‘Coordination costs and standard setting: lessons from 56K modems’ (2004) Center for the Study of Industrial Organization Working Paper #0056Google Scholar
Gupta, K. and Snyder, M., ‘Smart phone litigation and standard essential patents’ (2014) Working Paper Series No. 14006, Hoover Institution Working Group on Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Prosperity Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
Hachez, N. and Wouters, J., ‘Promoting the rule of law: a benchmarks approach’ (2013) KU Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paper No. 105Google Scholar
Halpin, H., ‘The crisis of standardizing DRM: the case of W3C encrypted media extensions’ (2017) in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference, SPACE 2017, Goa, India, December 13–17, 2017Google Scholar
Joerges, C., Schepel, H. and Vos, E., ‘The law’s problems with involvement of non-governmental actors in Europe’s legislative processes: the case of standardization under the new approach’ (1999) EUI Working Paper No. 99/9Google Scholar
Katznelson, R., ‘Perilous deviations from FRAND harmony: operational pitfalls of the 2015 IEEE patent policy’ (2015) in Proceedings of IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., ‘The contingent legitimacy of multilateralism’ (2006) GARNET Working Paper No. 09/06Google Scholar
Lindsay, M. A., Business review letter request to Assistant Attorney General, W. J. Baer (September 30, 2014)Google Scholar
Madnick, S. E., ‘The misguided silver bullet: what XML will and will NOT do to help information integration’ (2001) Sloan Working Paper 4185-01Google Scholar
Mallinson, K., ‘Development of innovative new standards jeopardised by IEEE patent policy’ (September 2017)Google Scholar
Murphy, C. and Yates, J., ‘Coordinating international standards: the formation of the ISO’ (2006)Google Scholar
Ohana, G., ‘Diversity in standards development: a response to Katznelson’ (2015) in Proceedings of IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. A. and Wouters, J., ‘Global governance as public authority: structures, contestation and normative change’ (2011) Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 06/11Google Scholar
Ping, W., ‘A brief history of standards and standardization organizations: a Chinese perspective’ (2011) East-West Center Working Papers: Economic Series No. 117Google Scholar
Pohlmann, T., ‘Empirical study on patenting and standardization activity in IEEE’ (March 2017) IPlytics GmbHGoogle Scholar
Price, M. E. and Verhulst, S. G., ‘In search of the self: charting the course of self-regulation on the internet in a global environment’ (2000) Cardozo Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 015Google Scholar
Purnhagen, K., ‘Voluntary “new approach” technical standards are subject to judicial scrutiny by the CJEU!: the remarkable CJEU judgment “Elliott” on private standards’ (2017) 2017/05 Wageningen Working Papers in Law and GovernanceGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F., ‘Problem-solving effectiveness and democratic accountability in the EU’ (2003) MPIfG Working Paper 03/1Google Scholar
Stewart, R. D., ‘Enforcement of transnational public regulation’ (2011) in EUI Working Papers, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Private Regulation Series-06, RSCAS 2011/49Google Scholar
Stoll, T., ‘Are you still in? The impact of licensing requirements on the composition of standards setting organizations’ (2014) Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper No. 14Google Scholar
Tabarés-Gutiérrez, R., ‘Taking a glance at the history of HTML5’, in K. Jacobs and K. Blind (eds.), EURAS Proceedings 2017. Digitalization: Challenge and Opportunity for Standardisation (Aachen: Verlaghaus Mainz GmbH, 2017), pp. T351–66Google Scholar
Thorstensen, V., Weissinger, R. and Sun, X., ‘Private standards: implications for trade, development and governance’ (2015) Think Piece of E15 Initiative on Regulatory Systems Coherence, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
Verbruggen, P. W. J. and Paiement, P. M., ‘Transnational private regulation’, in Oxford Bibliographies in Political Science (July 2017), available at www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756223/obo-9780199756223-0226.xmlGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J., ‘The rule of lawyers and the ethos of diplomats: reflections on the internal and external legitimacy of WTO dispute settlement’ (2000) Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper 9/00Google Scholar
Werle, R., ‘Standards in the international telecommunications regime’ (2001) Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA) Discussion Paper 157Google Scholar
Wijkstrom, E. and McDaniels, D., ‘International standards and the WTO TBT Agreement: improving governance for regulatory alignment’ (2013) World Trade Organization Staff Working Paper ERSD-2013-06Google Scholar
Wu, X., ‘Interplay between patents and standards in the information and communication technology (ICT) sector and its relevance to the implementation of the WTO agreements’ (2017) WTO Working Paper ERSD – 2017-08Google Scholar
Yu, P. K. , “The sweet and sour story of Chinese intellectual property rights” (2004) Paper commissioned for the ESRC Research Seminar Series on “Intellectual property rights, economic development and social welfare: what does history tell us”, Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
Baron, J., Contreras, J. L., Husovec, M., Larouche, P. and Thumm, N., ‘Making the rules: the governance of standard development organizations and their policies on intellectual property rights’ (2019) JRC Science for Policy Report, EUR 29655 EN, available at https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC115004/sdo_governance_final_electronic_version.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bekkers, R. and Updegrove, A., A Study of IPR Policies and Practices of a Representative Group of Standards Setting Organizations Worldwide, updated version (Washington, DC: National Academies of Science, 2013)Google Scholar
Breznitz, D. and Murphree, M., ‘The rise of China in technology standards: new norms in old institutions (2013) Report, available at www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/RiseofChinainTechnologyStandards.pdfGoogle Scholar
Contreras, J., ‘An empirical study of the effects of ex ante licensing disclosure policies on the development of voluntary technical standards’ (2011) Conducted for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), US Department of CommerceGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, A., Verheul, H. and De Vries, H., ‘Project Verbetering formele normalisatieproces – CASE ISO 15181: paints and varnishes – determination of release rate of biocides in antifouling paints’ (2003) Delft: Ministry of Economic AffairsGoogle Scholar
IPlytics, ‘Who is leading in the 5G patent race? Analysis on declared standard essential patents, 3GPP contributions and attendance data’ (February 2019)Google Scholar
Schepel, H. and Falke, J., ‘Legal aspects of standardization in Member States of the EC and EFTA, volume 1’ (February 25, 2000) European Commission PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Schwab, K., ‘The fourth industrial revolution: what it means, how to respond’ (World Economic Forum, 2016), available at www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/)Google Scholar
Doctorow, C., ‘Boring, complex and important: a recipe for the web’s dire future’ (September 21, 2017) Wired, available at www.wired.co.uk/article/w3c-eff-open-standards-web-cory-doctorowGoogle Scholar
Lawson, S., ‘Clouds hang low over Chinese WLAN standard’ (December 19, 2003) Computerworld, available at www.computerworld.com/article/2804354/clouds-hang-low-over-chinese-wlan-standardGoogle Scholar
Layne-Farrar, A., Why patent holdout is not just a fancy name for plain old patent infringement’ (February 2016) Competition Policy International, available at www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/why-patent-holdout-is-not-just-a-fancy-name-for-plain-old-patent-infringementGoogle Scholar
Nylen, L., ‘Electrical Engineer Institute’s new Wi-Fi measures won’t get American national standards designation’ (March 2019) Mlex, available at https://mlexmarketinsight.com/insights-center/editors-picks/antitrust/cross-jurisdiction/electrical-engineer-institutes-new-wifi-measures-wont-get-american-national-standard-designationGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, D., ‘Lowering your standards: DRM and the future of the W3C’ (October 2, 2013) available at www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/10/lowering-your-standardsGoogle Scholar
Way, J., ‘A brief history of HTML5’ (December 6, 2011), available at https://code.tutsplus.com/articles/a-brief-history-of-html5--net-23064Google Scholar