Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:08:27.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2009

Edited by
Christine Jourdan  and
Kevin Tuite
Christine Jourdan
Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal
Kevin Tuite
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Language, Culture, and Society
Key Topics in Linguistic Anthropology
 , pp. 257 - 300
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarsleff, Hans. 1983. The study of language in England, 1780–1860. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Aarsleff, Hans 1988. “Introduction.” In Wilhelm, Humboldt, On language, ⅶ–ⅼⅹⅴ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abramov, Israel. 1997. “Physiological mechanisms of color vision.” In Hardin, C. L. and Luisa, Maffi (eds.), Color categories in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1986. Veiled sentiments: honor and poetry in a Bedouin society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Abu-Lughod, Lila 1995. Writing women's worlds. Bedouin stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Abu-Lughod, Lila and Catherine Lutz. 1990. “Introduction: emotion, discourse, and the politics of everyday life.” In Lutz, C. and Abu-Lughod, L. (eds.), Language and the politics of emotion, 1–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adam, Lucien. 1883. Les idiomes négro-aryen et maléo-aryen. Paris.Google Scholar
Adone, Dany and Ingo, Plag (eds.). 1994. Creolization and language change. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aerts, Romana. 2000. “L'Histoire des Perses de A. de Gobineau dans le cadre de la mythologie de l'impérialisme Indo-européen.” In Sylvie, Vanséveren (ed.), Modèles linguistiques et Idéologie: “Indo-Européen”, 97–108. Bruxelles: Éditions Ousia.Google Scholar
Alford, Danny K. H. Moonhawk. 1978. “The demise of the Whorf hypothesis (a major revision in the history of linguistics).” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, Danny K. H. Moonhawk 1981. “Is Whorf's relativity Einstein's relativity?” Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 7: 13–26.Google Scholar
Alford, Danny K. H. Moonhawk 2002. “The great Whorf hypothesis hoax: sin, suffering and redemption in academe.” (Available at www.enformy.com/dma-Chap7.htm.)
Alleyne, Mervyn C. 1966. “La nature du changement phonétique à la lumière du créole français d'Haïti.” Revue de linguistique romane 30: 279–303.Google Scholar
Alleyne, Mervyn C. 1971. “Acculturation and the cultural matrix of creolization.” In Dell, Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages, 169–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alleyne, Mervyn C. 1980. Comparative Afro-American: an historical comparative study of some Afro-American dialects in the New World. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1968 (1970). “The object of Capital.” In Louis, Althusser and Etienne, Balibar, Reading Capital, 71–198. Ben Brewster, trans. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Cáccamo, Celso. 1998. “From ‘switching code’ to ‘code-switching’: towards a reconceptualization of communicative codes.” In Peter, Auer (ed.), Code-switching in conversation, 29–50. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1988. “Center and periphery: adoption, diffusion, and spread.” In Jacek, Fisiak (ed.), Historical dialectology: regional and social. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 39–84.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Revised edition. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jeffrey. 2001. The four hills of life: Northern Arapaho life, knowledge, and personhood. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Anthony, David W. 1995. “Nazi and eco-feminist prehistories: ideology and empiricism in Indo-European archaeology.” In Philip, L. Kohl and Clare, Fawcett (eds.), Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology, 82–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo. 1988. “The type and the comparative method.” In Jorn, Albrecht, Harald, Thun, and Jens, Lüdtke (eds.), Eugenio Coseriu. Energeia und Ergon: sprachliche Variation, Sprachgeschichte, Sprachtypologie, 43–56. Band ii. Tübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
Apter, Andrew. 1998. “Discourse and its disclosures: Yoruba women and the sanctity of abuse.” Africa 68(1): 68–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aracil, Lluis. 1982. Papers de sociolinguistica. Barcelona: La Magrana.Google Scholar
Arends, Jacques. 1993. “Towards a gradualist model of creolization.” In Byrne, F. and Holm, J. (eds.), Atlantic meets Pacific: a global view of pidginization and creolization, 371–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Arends, Jacques (ed.). 1995. The early stages of creolization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Arends, Jacques 2001. “Social stratification and network relations in the formation of Sranan.” In Smith, N. and Veenstra, T. (eds.), Creolization and Contact, 291–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atran, Scott. 1984. Bilingual conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Atran, Scott 1990. Cognitive foundations of natural history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auer, J. C. P. 1988. “A conversational approach to code-switching and transfer.” In Heller, M. (ed.), Code-switching: anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives, 187–213. Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, J. C. P. (ed.). 1998. Code-switching in conversation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Austerlitz, Robert. 1958. Ob-Ugric metrics. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemina Scientium Fennila.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to do things with words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1979. “Performative utterances.” Philosophical Papers, 233–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Colin. 2001. Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. 3rd edn. Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip. 1983. “Commentaire sur Chaudenson 1983.” Etudes Créoles 6(2): 230–236.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip 1990. “Off target.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 5: 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Philip 1993a. “Assessing the African contribution to French-based creoles.” In Salikoko, S. Mufwene (ed.), Africanisms in Afro-American language varieties, 123–155. Athens/London: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip 1993b. “Australian influence on Melanesian pidgin English.” Te Reo 36: 3–67.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip 1995. “Directionality in pidginization and creolization.” In Arthur, Spears and Donald, Winford (eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles, 91–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins publishing company.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip 2000. “Theories of creolization and the degree and nature of restructuring.” In Ingrid, Neumann-Holzschuh and Edgar, W. Schneider (eds.), Degrees of restructuring in creole languages, 41–63. Creole language library. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip and Chris, Corne. 1982. Isle de France creole: affinities and origins. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip and Anand, Syea (eds.). 1996. Changing meanings, changing functions. Westminster creolistics series, 2. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. “The problem of speech genres.” In Caryl, Emerson and Michael, Holquist (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, Egbert. 1999. “Homeric outos (ΟΥΤΟΣ) and the poetics of deixis.” Classical Philology 94: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter and Maarten, Mous (eds.). 1994. Mixed languages. Studies in language and language use, 13. Dordrecht: ICG Printing.Google Scholar
Baldinger, Kurt. 1995. “Gilles Ménage, grammairien et lexicographe: Ouverture du Colloque.” In Isabelle, Leroy-Turcan and Terence, R. Wooldridge (eds.), Gilles Ménage (1613–1692) grammairien et lexicographe: le rayonnement de son oeuvre linguistique, 1–8. Lyon: Université Jean Moulin.Google Scholar
Balibar, Renée. 1984. Galilée, Newton lus par Einstein. Espace et relativité. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Barkow, Jerome H. 1994. “Evolutionary psychological anthropology.” In Bock, P. K. (ed.), Psychological anthropology, 121–37. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Barney, Rachel. 1998. “Socrates Agonistes: the case of the Cratylus etymologies.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16: 63–98.Google Scholar
Barth, Fredrik (ed.). 1969. Ethnic groups and boundaries. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Basilius, Harold. 1952. “Neo-Humboldtian ethnolinguistics.” Word 8: 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bate, John Bernard. 2000. “Meedaittamil: oratory and democratic practice in Tamilnadu.” Ph. D. thesis, University of Chicago.
Bates, E., L. Camaioni, and V. Volterra. 1979. “The acquisition of performatives prior to speech.” In Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.), Developmental pragmatics, 111–129. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard. 1984. Verbal arts as performance. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard and Charles, Briggs. 1990. “Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard and Charles Briggs 2000. “Language philosophy as language ideology: John Locke and Johann Gottfried Herder.” In Paul, V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: ideologies, polities, and identities, 139–204. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Bavin, E. 1989. “Some lexical and morphological changes in Walpiri.” In Dorian, N. (ed.), Investigating obsolescence: studies in language contraction and death, 267–286. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavin, E. 1992. “The acquisition of Walpiri.” In Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 309–372. Vol 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Baxter, Timothy M. S. 1992. The Cratylus: Plato's critique of naming. Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, A. L. 1995. Beyond translation: essays toward a modern philology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeman, William O. 1986. Language, status and power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Beeman, William O. 2000. “Emotion and sincerity in Persian discourse: accomplishing the representation of inner states.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 148: 1–26.Google Scholar
Benedict, Ruth. 1934. Patterns of culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bengtson, John D. and Merritt, Ruhlen. 1994. “Global etymologies.” In On the origin of languages: studies in linguistic taxonomy, 277–336. Stanford: Stanford University Press, Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bentolila, André. 1971. Les systèmes verbaux créoles: comparaisons avec les langues africaines. Thèse de 3ème cycle. Paris: Université René Descartes.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1958 (1966). “Catégories de pensée et catégories de langue.” In Emile, Benveniste, Problèmes de linguistique générale, 63–74. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile 1969. Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes, Vol. 1. Économie, parenté, société. Paris: Éditions de MinuitGoogle Scholar
Bergvall, Victoria, Janet, Bing, and Alice, Freed (eds.). 1996. Rethinking Language and Gender Research, Theory and Practice. New York; London: Longman.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren. 1997 “Introduction: the intimate public sphere.” The Queen of America Goes to Washington City, Essays on Sex and Citizenship. 1–24. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent. 1992. Ethnobiological classification. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent and Elois, Ann Berlin. 1975. “Aguaruna color categories.” American Ethnologist 2: 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent and Paul, Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent, Dennis, Breedlove and Peter, H. Raven. 1973. “General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology.” American Anthropologist 75: 214–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent, Dennis, Breedlove and Peter, H. Raven 1974. Principles of Tzeltal plant classification. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berlinski, David. 1995. A tour of the calculus. NY: Random House (Vinton).Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth and Dan, I. Slobin. 1994. Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berndt, Ronald M. 1976. Love songs of Arnhem land. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Charles. 1998. Clare listening. Poetry and the performed word. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Frédéric. 2002. L'anthropologie soviétique des années 20–30. Configuration d'une rupture. Pessac: Presses universitaires de Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko. 1993. “Reported Speech and Affect on Nukulaelae Atoll.” In Jane, Hill and Judith, Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, 161–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko 1994. “Polynesian gender liminality through time and space.” In Herdt, G., Third sex, third gender: beyond sexual dimorphism in culture and history, 285–328. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Homi K. 1994. The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biardeau, Madeleine. 1982. Hindouisme: anthropologie d'une civilization. Editions Champs-Flammarion.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1977. “Pidginization and creolization: language acquisition and language universals.” In Albert, Valdman (ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics, 49–69. Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek 1980. Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek 1984. “The language bioprogram hypothesis.” Brain and Behavioural Sciences 7: 173–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek 1986. “Creoles and West African languages: a case of mistaken identity?” In Pieter, C. Muysken and Norval, Smith (eds.), Substrata versus universals in Creole genesis, 25–40. Creole language library, 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek 1988. “Creole languages and the bioprogram.” In Frederick, J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistic theory: extensions and implications, 268–284. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek 1990a. Language and species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek 1990b. “On Mufwene's response to Bickerton.” The Carrier Pidgin 17(1,2): 6–7; 18(1): 3–4.Google Scholar
Billiez, Jacqueline. 1998. “L'alternance des langues en chantant.” LIDIL 18: 125–140.Google Scholar
Black, Max. 1962. Models and metaphors: studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Maurice E. F. 1994. “Language, anthropology, and cognitive science.” In Assessing cultural anthropology, ed. Robert, Borofsky, 276–282. NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bloch, Maurice E. F. 1998. How we think they think: anthropological approaches to cognition, memory, and literacy. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Ralph Howard. 1983. Etymologies and genealogies: a literary anthropology of the French Middle Ages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blom, Jan-Petter and John Gumperz. 1972. “Social meaning in linguistic structures: code-switching in Norway.” In John, Gumperz and Dell, Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication, 407–434. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (ed.). 1999. Language ideological debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (ed.) 2001. “The Asmara declaration as a sociolinguistic problem: Reflections on scholarship and linguistic rights.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(1): 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, A. H. 1981. The linguistic shaping of thought: a study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bloom, K. 1990. “Selectivity and early infant vocalization.” In Enns, J. T. (ed.), The development of attention: research and theory, 121–136. B. V. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. 1970. Language development: form and function in emerging grammar. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul, Mary, A. Peterson, Lynn, Nadel, and Merrill, F. Garrett (eds.). 1996. Language and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Blount, Ben G. (ed.). (1995). Language, culture, and society. 2nd edn. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 1996. “The Neogrammarian hypothesis and pandemic irregularity.” In Mark, Durie and Malcolm, Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed: regularity and irregularity in language change, 135–156. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1887 (1974). “Museums of ethnology and their classification.” In George, W. Stocking Jr. (ed.), The shaping of American anthropology, 1883–1917, 63–67. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz 1889 (1940). “The aims of ethnology.” In Franz, Boas, Race, language, and culture, 626–638. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz 1889 (1974). “On alternating sounds.” In George, W. Stocking Jr. (ed.), The shaping of American anthropology, 1883–1911, 72–77. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz 1899. “Advances in methods of teaching.” In Race, language, culture, 621–625. NewYork: Free Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz 1910. “Publicaciones nuevas sobre la lingüística americana.” In Reseña de la segunda sesión del XVII Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, 225–232. Mexico: Museo Nacional de Arqueología, Historia y Etnología.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz 1911. “Introduction.” In Franz, Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian languages. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1–83. [Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 40, Part 1.]Google Scholar
Bock, Philip R. 1984. Shakespeare and Elizabethan culture. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Bock, Philip R. 1994. Psychological anthropology. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bohannon, Paul. 1963. Social anthropology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Böhtlink, Otto. 1964 (1815). Über die Sprache der Yakuten. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Boix, Emili and Xavier Vila, F.. 1998. Sociolingüística de la llengua catalana. Barcelona: Ariel Lingüística.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Kessen, W., and Weiskopf, S.. 1976. “Color vision and hue categorization in young human infants.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2: 115–129.Google ScholarPubMed
Boroditsky, L. 2001. “Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers' conceptions of time.” Cognitive Psychology, 43(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. “Le fétichisme de la langue.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 4: 2–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1983. “Vous avez dit ‘populaire’?” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 46: 98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa. 1985. “What shapes children's grammars?” In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 2, 1257–1320. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa 1996a. “The origins of children's spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants.” In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 145–176. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa 1996b. Learning how to structure space for language. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L., and Garrett, M. F. (eds.), Language and space, 385–436. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa 2000. “Where do children's word meanings come from? Rethinking the role of cognition in semantic development.” In Nucci, L., Saxe, G., and Turiel, E. (eds.), Culture, thought, and development, 199–230. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa and Soonja Choi. 2001. “Shaping meanings for language: universal and language specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories.” In Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development, 475–511. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa and Soonja Choi 2003. “Space under construction: language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition.” In Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.), Language in mind: advances in the study of language and thought, 387–427. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa and Stephen, C. Levinson (eds.). 2001. Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Henri. 1991. Langues en conflit. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Boyer, Pascal (ed.). 1993. Cognitive aspects of religious symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenneis, Donald and Ronald, H. S. Macaulay (eds.). 1996. The matrix of language: contemporary linguistic anthropology. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles. 1988. Competence and performance: the creativity of tradition in Mexican verbal art. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bright, William O. 1979. “A Karok myth in measured verse: the translation of a performance.” Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 1: 117–123.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope. 1998. “Conversational structure and language acquisition: the role of repetition in Tzeltal.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 8(2): 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope 2001. “Learning to talk about motion up and down in Tzeltal: is there a language-specific bias for verb learning?” In Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development, 512–543. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope 2002a. “Everyone has to lie in Tzeltal.” In Blum-Kulka, S. and Snow, C. E. (eds.), Talking to adults: the contribution of multiparty discourse to language acquisition, 241–275. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope 2002b. “Language as a model for culture: lessons from the cognitive sciences.” In King, B. and Fox, R. (eds.), Anthropology beyond culture, 169–192. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, S. C.. 1987. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and S. C. Levinson 1993a. “Linguistic and nonlinguistic coding of spatial arrays: explorations in Mayan cognition.” Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Working Paper 24, Oct. 1993.
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, S. C. 1993b. “‘Uphill’ and ‘downhill’ in Tzeltal.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 3(1): 46–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and S. C. Levinson 2000. “Frames of spatial reference and their acquisition in Tenejapan Tzeltal.” In Nucci, L., Saxe, G., and Turiel, E. (eds.), Culture, thought, and development, 167–197. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1977. “Introduction.” In Ferguson, C. and Snow, C. (eds.), Talking to children: language input and acquisition, 1–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R., C. Cazden, and U. Bellugi. 1968. “The child's grammar from i to iii.” In Hill, J. P. (ed.), The second annual Minnesota symposium on child psychology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 28–73.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger Langham. 1967. Wilhelm von Humboldt's conception of linguistic relativity. The Hague: Mouton. [Janua Linguarum, Series minor, 65.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger W. and Eric, H. Lenneberg. 1954. “A study of language and cognition.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 49: 454–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bucholtz, Mary and Kira, Hall. 1995. “Introduction: twenty years after Language and woman's place.” In Hall, Gender articulated, 1–22.Google Scholar
Bunzl, Matti. 1996. “Franz Boas and the Humboldtian tradition: from Volksgeist and Nationalcharakter to an anthropological concept of culture.” In George, W. Stocking Jr. (ed.), Volksgeist as Method and Ethic: Essays on Boasian Anthropology and the German Anthropological Tradition, 17–78. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Buridant, Claude. 1998. “Les paramètres de l'étymologie médiévale.” L'étymologie, de l'antiquité à la Renaissance, 11–56. Numéro coordonné et présenté par C. Buridant et al. Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble, feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith 1997. Excitable speech, a politics of the performative. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bynon, Theodora. 1966. “Leo Weisgerber's four stages in linguistic analysis.” Man n.s. 1: 468–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Francis and Thom, Huebner (eds.). 1991. Development and structures of creole languages. Creole language library, 10. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. and Whiten, A. (eds.). 1988. Machiavellian intelligence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Calame-Griaule, Geneviève. 1987. Ethnologie et langage. La parole chez les Dogon. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 1995. Critical social theory, culture, history and the challenge of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1995. Verbal hygiene. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah and Don, Kulick. 2003. Language and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capro, Fritjof. 1977. The Tao of physics. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Carne-Ross, D. S. and Kenneth, Haynes. 1996. Horace in English. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Peter, and Jill, Boucher (eds.). 1998. Language and thought: interdisciplinary themes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Anne. 1986. Eros the bittersweet: an essay. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Casasola, Marianella, 2005. “Can language do the driving? The effect of linguistic input on infants' categorization of support spatial relations.” Developmental Psychology 41(1): 183–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassirer, Ernst. 1923 (1955). The philosophy of symbolic forms. I. Language. Ralph Mannheim, trans. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Casson, R. W. (ed.). 1981. Language, culture and cognition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Casson, R. W. (ed.) 1983. “Schemata in cognitive anthropology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 12: 429–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castonguay, Charles. 1996. “L'intérêt particulier de la démographie pour le fait français au Canada.” In Jürgen, Erfurt (ed.), De la polyphonie à la symphonie. Méthodes, théories et faits de la recherche pluridisciplinaire sur le français au Canada, 3–18. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Caton, Steven. 1990. “Peaks of Yemen I Summon.” Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. 1965. “Environmental assistance to the child's acquisition of grammar.” Unpublished Ph. D. thesis. Harvard University.
Chafe, Wallace and Johanna, Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1995. Sociolinguistic theory: linguistic variation and its social significance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre. 1990. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: histoire des mots. (Nouv. tirage). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1976. “Philosophical perspectives.” Aspects of Chinese sociolinguistics. Selected and Introduced by Anwar, S. Dil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Ranjit. 1985. “Reading Whorf through Wittgenstein: a solution to the linguistic relativity problem.” Lingua 67: 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert. 1974. Le lexique du parler créole de la Réunion. Paris: Champion. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert 1977. “Toward the reconstruction of the social matrix of Creole language.” In Albert, Valdman (ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics, 259–277. Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert 1979. Les créoles français. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert 1983. “Où l'on reparle de la genèse et des structures des créoles de l'Océan Indien.” Études créoles 6(2): 157–224.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert 1988. “Le dictionnaire du créole Mauricien: où l'on reparle (à nouveau mais pour la dernière fois) de la genèse des créoles réunionnais.” Etudes Créoles 11(2): 35–54.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert 1992. Des îles, des hommes, des langues. Langues créoles/cultures créoles. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja and Melissa, Bowerman. 1991. “Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns.” Cognition 41: 83–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, Soonja, Laraine, McDonough, Melissa, Bowerman, and Jean, Mandler. 1999. “Early sensitivity to language-specific spatial categories in English and Korean.” Cognitive Development 14(2): 241–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1980. Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dorbrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia. 1985. “The acquisition of Japanese.” In Slobin, D. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, 373–524. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia 1986. “The acquisition of communicative style in Japanese.” In Schieffelin, B. B. and Ochs, E. (eds.), Language socialization across cultures, 213–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia 1999. “The socialization of affect in Japanese mother–child conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 31(11): 1397–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, P. M., N. Akatsuka, and S. Strauss. 1997. “Deontic modality and conditionality in discourse: A cross-linguistic study of adult speech to young children.” In Akio, Kamio (ed.), Directions in functional linguistics, 19–57. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. and Garnica, O.. 1974. “Is he coming or going? On the acquisition of deictic verbs.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 559–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1973. “Space, time, semantics and the child.” In Timothy, E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, 28–64. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, James and George, Marcus (eds.). 1986. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cloeren, Hermann J. 1988. Language and thought: German approaches to analytic philosophy in the 18th and 19th centuries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cole, Michael and Sylvia, Scribner. 1974. Culture and thought. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cole, Michael and Sylvia Scribner 1977. “Cross-cultural studies of memory and cognition.” In Kail, R. V. and Hagen, J. W. (eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition, 239–72. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Coleman, Steve. 1999. Return from the West. A poetics of voice in Irish. Ph. D. thesis. Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Conklin, Harold C. 1955. “Hanunóo color categories.”Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11: 339–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, H. M. 1988. “Sentential particles in Japanese conversation: a study of indexicality.” Unpublished Dissertation. University of Southern California.
Cook, H. M. 1996. “Japanese language socialization: indexing the modes of self.” Discourse Processes 22(2): 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copjec, Joan. 1994. “Sex and the euthanasia of reason.” In Read my desire, Lacan against the historians. 201–236. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Corne, Chris. 1983. “Commentaire sur Chaudenson 1983.” Etudes Créoles 6(2): 22–59.Google Scholar
Corris, Peter. 1973. Passage, port and plantation: a history of Solomon Islands migration, 1870–1904. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Crago, Martha. 1988. “Cultural context in communicative interaction of Inuit children.” Unpublished Dissertation. McGill University, Montreal.
Crapanzano, Vincent. 1993. “Text, transference, and indexicality.” In Lucy, J. (ed.), Reflexive language, 293–314. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crapanzano, Vincent 1998. “‘Lacking now is only the leading idea, that is – we, the rays, have no thoughts’: interlocutory collapse in Daniel Paul Schreber's Memoirs of my nervous illness.” Critical Inquiry 24(3): 737–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, T. 1977. “Mothers' speech adjustments: the contribution of selected child listener variables.” In Ferguson, C. and Snow, C. (eds.), Talking to children: language input and acquisition, 151–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 1990. Beach-la-mar to Bislama. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cuervo Marquez, Carlos. 1924. “La percepcion de los colores in algunas tribus indígenas de Colombia.” Proceedings of the International Congress of Americanists 20: 49–51.Google Scholar
Curtius, Georg. 1866. Grundzüge der griechischen Etymologie (2. erweiterte aufl.) Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
D'Ambrósio, Ubiratan. 1992. “Ethnomathematics: a research program on the history and philosophy of mathematics with pedagogical implications.” Notices of the American Mathematical Society 39. 10: 1183–1185.Google Scholar
D'Andrade, Roy. 1984. “Cultural meaning systems.” In Shweder, R. A. and Levine, R. A. (eds.), Culture theory: essays on mind, self, and emotion, 88–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D'Andrade, Roy 1989. “Culturally based reasoning.” In Gellatly, A., Rogers, D., and Sloboda, J. A. (eds.), Cognition and social worlds, 132–143. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
D'Andrade, Roy 1995. The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Andrade, Roy and Claudia, Strauss (eds.). 1992. Human motives and cultural models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, E. Valentine and Jeffrey, M. Peck. 1996. Culture/contexture. Explorations in anthropology and literary study. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Danziger, Eve. 2001. “Cross-cultural studies in language and thought: is there a metalanguage?” In Moore, C. and Matthews, H. (eds.), The psychology of cultural experience, 199–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna. 1974. “Rationalist aspects of the Whorf hypothesis.” Papers in Linguistics 7: 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Regna 1989. “Stanley Newman and the Sapir School of Linguistics.” In Mary, Ritchie Key and Henry, Hoenigswald (eds.), General and Amerindian linguistics: in remembrance of Stanley Newman, 71–88. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna 1990. Edward Sapir: linguist, anthropologist, humanist. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna 1998a. “Camelot at Yale: the establishment and dismantling of the Sapirian synthesis (1931–1939).” American Anthropologist 100: 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Regna 1998b. “Mary Haas and the ‘first school of Yale linguistics.’” Anthropological Linguistics 39: 566–575.Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna 1998c. And along came Boas: continuity and revolution in Americanist anthropology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Regna 2001. Invisible genealogies: a history of Americanist Anthropology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Davidoff, Jules. 2001. “Language and perceptual categorisation.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5: 382–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidoff, Jules, Ian, Davies, and Debi, Roberson. 1999. “Colour categories in a stone age tribe.” Nature, 398: 203–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1974 (1984). “On the very idea of a conceptual scheme.” In Donald, Davidson, Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 183–198.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel (ed.). 1999. Language creation and language change: creolization, diachrony and development. Boaston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel 2001. In Kenttale: a life in language, ed. Michael, Keastowicz. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press, pp. 53–121.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel 2003. “Against creole exceptionalism.” Language, 79:(2): 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houwer, A. 1990. The acquisition of two languages from birth: a case study. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauretis, Theresa. 1984. Alice doesn't, feminism, semiotics, cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
León, Lourdes. 1994. “Exploration in the acquisition of geo-centric location by Tzotzil children.” In Space in Mayan languages, Special issue ed. John Haviland and Stephen C. Levinson, Linguistics 32 (4/5): 857–885.Google Scholar
León, Lourdes 1998. “The emergent participant: interactive patterns in the socialization of Tzotzil (Mayan) infants.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 8(2): 131–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de León, Lourdes 2001. “Finding the richest path: language and cognition in the acquisition of verticality in Tzotzil (Mayan).” In Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development, 544–565. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
León, Lourdes and Stephen, C. Levinson (eds.). 1992. Spatial description in Mesoamerican languages. Special issue of Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 45(6): 590–611.Google Scholar
Mejía, Anne-Marie. 2002. Power, prestige and bilingualism: international perspectives on elite bilingual education. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Valois, Russell L., Israel, Abramov, and Jacobs, G. H.. 1966. “Analysis of responses patterns of LGN cells.” Journal of the Optical Society of America 59: 966–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valois, Russell L., Morgan, H. C., Polson, M. C., Mead, W. R., and Hull, E. M.. 1974. “Psychophysical studies of monkey vision–I. Macaque luminosity and color vision tests.” Vision Research 14: 53–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demuth, C. 1986. “Prompting routines in the language socialization of Basotho children.” In Schieffelin, B. B. and Ochs, E. (eds.), Language socialization across cultures, 51–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deprez, Christine. 1994. Les enfants bilingues: langues et familles. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1967. “La structure, le signe et le jeu dans le discours des sciences humaines.” In Jacques, Derrida, L'écriture et la différence. Paris: Seuil, 409–428.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1982. “Signature Event Context.” In The Margins of Philosophy. Alan, Bass, trans. 307–330. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Derrington, A. M., Krauskopf, J., and Lennie, P.. 1984. “Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque.” Journal of Physiology 357: 241–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, Stanley. 1986. “Special issue on poetry and anthropology.” Dialectical Anthropology 11: (2–4).Google Scholar
Diez, Friedrich. 1861. Etymologisches Worterbuch der romanischen Sprachen (2 verbesserte Ausgabe). Bonn: Weber.Google Scholar
Dirven, René, Roslyn, Frank, and Martin, Pütz (eds.). 2003. Cognitive models in language and thought. Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doniger, Wendy. 1991. The Rig Veda. An anthropology.New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dorian, N. (ed.). 1989. Investigating obsolescence: studies in language contraction and death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, Janet W. D. 1975. “A universalist analysis of variation and change in color semantics.” Ph. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Dougherty, Janet W. D. 1977. “Color categorization in West Futunese: variability and change.” In Blount, B. G. and Sanches, M. (eds.), Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Change, 133–148. New York, London: Plenum.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Janet W. D. (ed.). 1985. Directions in cognitive anthropology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Janet W. D. and Charles M. Keller. 1985. “Taskonomy: a practical approach to knowledge structures.” In Dougherty, J. W. D. (ed.), Directions in cognitive anthropology, 161–174. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1984. Purity and danger: an analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Droixhe, Daniel. 1989. “Le primitivisme linguistique de Turgot.” In textes réunis par Chantal Grell et Christian Michel, Primitivisme et mythes des origines dans la France des lumières 1680–1820, 59–87. Paris: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Dubois, Jacques (Sylvius). 1531/1998. Introduction à la langue française suivie d'une grammaire. Ed. and trans. Colette, Demaiziere. (Textes de la Renaissance, 22; Traités sur la langue française, 1.) Paris: Honore Champion.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1997. Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (ed.). 2001a. Linguistic anthropology: a reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (ed.). 2001b. Key terms in language and culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro 2003. “Language as culture in US anthropology: three paradigms.” Current Anthropology 44(3): 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro and Charles, Goodwin (eds.). 1992. Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language, 11.]Google Scholar
Durham, William. 1991. Coevolution. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile and Marcel, Mauss. 1987. Primitive classification. Trans. Rodney Needham. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, Tom. 1983. “Birds of a feather: a pair of rare pidgins from the Gulf of Papua.” In Woolford, E. and Washabaugh, W. (eds.), The social context of creolization, 77–105. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Eberwein, T. D. 1998. An Emily Dickinson encyclopedia. Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1991. “Social polarization and the choice of linguistic variants.” In Penelope, Eckert (ed.), New ways of analyzing sound change, 213–231. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice: the linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Monro. 1971. The book of counsel: the Popol Vu of the Quiche Maya of Guatemala. Tulan University Middle American Research Institute. Publication no. 35.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Susan and Ruth King. 1996. “Consensual sex or sexual harassment: negotiating meaning.” In Bergvall, , Bing, , and Freed, (eds.), Rethinking Language, 153–172. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, A. 1986. “Teasing: verbal play in two Mexican homes.” In Schieffelin, B. B. and Ochs, E. (eds.), Language socialization across cultures, 182–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray. 1969. “Onomatopoetics in the Indian linguistic area.” Language 45: 224–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, Nora C. 1978. “Space as a Mam grammatical theme.” In Nora, England (ed.), Papers in Mayan linguistics, 225–38. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Erickson, Jon, Marion, Gymnich, and Ansgar, Nünning. 1997. “Wilhelm von Humboldt, Edward Sapir, and the Constructivist Framework.” Historiographia Linguistica 24: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Errington, Joseph J. 1988. Structure and style in Javanese: a semiotic view of linguistic etiquette. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Escure, Geneviève. 1997. Creole and dialect continua. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essock, S. M. 1977. “Color perception and color classification.” In Rumbaugh, D. M. (ed.), Language learning by a chimpanzee. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 2005. “Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: another look at the design features of human language.” With discussion and reply. Current Anthropology 46: 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabian, Johannes. 1983. Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fabian, Johannes 1986. Language and colonial power. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fabian, Johannes 1990. Power in performance: ethnographic explorations through proverbial wisdom and theater in Shaba, Zaire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Fabian, Johannes 1993. “Crossing and patrolling: thoughts on anthropology and boundaries.” Culture xiii (1): 49–54.Google Scholar
Fader, A. 2001. “Literacy, bilingualism and gender in a Hasidic community.” Linguistics and Education 12 (3): 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatnowna, Noël. 1989. Fragments of a lost heritage. North Ryde, Aus.: Angus and Robertson Ltd.Google Scholar
Feld, Steven. 1982. Sound and sentiment, birds, weeping: poetics and song in Kaluli expression. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1964. “Baby talk in six languages.” American Anthropologist 66(6): 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1964. “Diglossia.” In Dell, Hymes (ed.), Language in culture and society, 429–439. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1977. “Baby talk as a simplified register.” In Ferguson, C. and Snow, C. (eds.), Talking to children: language input and acquisition, 209–235. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1982. “Simplified registers and linguistic theory.” In Obler, L. K. and Lise, Menn (eds.), Exceptional language and linguistics, 49–66. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fernandez, James. 1986. Persuasion and performance: the play of tropes in cultures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fernandez, James (ed.) 1991. Beyond metaphor: the theory of tropes in anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferraz, Luiz. 1983. “The origin and development of four creoles in the Gulf of Guinea in the social context of creolization.” In Ellen, Woolford and William, Washabaugh (eds.), The social context of creolization, 120–125. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Feuer, Lewis S. 1953. “Sociological aspects of the relation between language and philosophy.” Philosophy of Science 20: 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, M. 1999. “Maintenance of indigenous ways of speaking despite language shift: language socialization in a Navajo preschool.” Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Finck, Franz Nikolaus. 1899. Der deutsche Sprachbau als Ausdruck deutscher Weltanschauung: Acht Vorträge. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Finck, Franz Nikolaus 1910. Die Haupttypen des Sprachbaus. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth. 1977. Oral poetry: its nature, significance and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua (ed.). 1968. Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1983. Modularity of mind: an essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1988. “Language birth: the processes of pidginization and creolization.” In Frederick, J. Newmeyer (ed.), Language: the socio-cultural context, 162–183. Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1997. Anthropological linguistics: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fornel, Michel de. 2002. “Le destin d'un argument. Le relativisme linguistique de Sapir-Whorf.” In Michel, Fornel and Jean-Claude, Passeron (eds.). L'argumentation. Preuve et persuasion, 121–147. Paris: Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1977. Language, counter-memory, practice: selected essays and interviews by Michel, Foucault. Edited by Donald, Bouchard. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1979. The history of sexuality: Vol. 1: An introduction. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Fournier, Robert. 1987. “Le bioprogramme et les français créoles.” Ph. D. thesis. Sherbrooke: Département de linguistique, Université de Sherbrooke.
Fox, Richard G. and Barbara, J. King (eds.). 2002. Anthropology beyond culture. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Frake, Charles O. 1971 [1985]. “Cognitive maps of time and tide among medieval seafarers.” Man 20: 254–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franciscan, Fathers. 1910. An ethnological dictionary of the Navaho language. Arizona: St. Michaels.Google Scholar
Franklin, A. and Davies, I. R. L. (2004). “New evidence for infant colour categories.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 22(3): 349–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, A., Clifford, A., Williamson, E., and Davies, I. R. L. (2005). “Colour term knowledge does not affect Categorical Perception of colour in toddlers.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 90: 114–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1993. “Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy.” In Craig, Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the public sphere, 109–142. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1989. Totem and taboo. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Judith. 1975. Being an Indian in Hueyapan. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1969. “On the meaning of the Tarascan suffixes of space.” International Journal of American Linguistics 35(4): 5–28. Memoir 23.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul 1970. “Shape in grammar.” Language 46: 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Paul 1971. The Tarascan suffixes of locative space: meaning and morphotactics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul 1972. “Shape categories in grammar.” Linguistics 77: 5–22.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul 1979. “Poetic language and the imagination: a reformulation of the Sapir Hypothesis.” In Anwar, S. Dil (ed.), Language, context and the imagination: essays by Paul Friedrich, 441–517. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul 1979 [1966]. “Proto-Indo-European kinship.” Language, context and the imagination, 201–252. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul 1986. The language parallax: linguistic relativism and poetic indeterminacy. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul 1989. “The Tao of language.” Journal of Pragmatics 13: 833–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Paul 1998. Music in Russian poetry. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Frisk, Hjalmar. 1960. Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Frost, Robert. 1964. “Letter to John Bartlett.” Selected letters of Robert Frost, ed. Lawrence, Thompson. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1982. “Hermeneutics as a theoretical and practical task.” Reason in the age of science, 113–138. Trans. Frederick, G. Lawrence. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gadet, Françoise. 1990. Saussure. Une science de la langue. Second edition. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Gal, S. 1979. Language shift: social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gal, S. 1991. “Problematics of research on language and gender.” In di Leonardo, (ed.), Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge, 175–203. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gal, S. 1993. “Diversity and contestation in linguistic ideologies: German speakers in Hungary.” Language in Society 22(3): 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S. 1995. “Lost in a Slavic sea: linguistic theories and expert knowledge in 19th century Hungary.” Pragmatics 5(2): 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S. 1998. “Multiplicity and contestation among linguistic ideologies.” In Bambi, Schieffelin, Kathryn, A. Woolard, and Paul, Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: practice and theory, 113–138. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galenson, David W. 1986. Traders, planters and slaves: market behaviour in early English America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamillscheg, Ernst. 1969. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der französischen Sprache (2, vollständig neu bearb. Auflage). Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, Tamaz and Vjacheslav V. Ivanov. 1984. Indoevropejskij jazyk i indoevropejcy. Tbilisi State University Press. (English translation: Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A reconstruction and historical analysis of a proto-language and a proto-culture, trans. Johanna Nichols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.)
Gardner, Howard. 1989. The mind's new science. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Garrett, Paul. B. 1999. “Language socialization, convergence and shift in St. Lucia, West Indies.” Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, New York University.
Garrett, Paul. B. 2000. “High Kwéyol: the emergence of a formal creole register in Santa-Lucia, West Indies.” In John, McWhorter (ed.), Language change and language contact in pidgins and creoles, 63–101. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Garrett, Paul B. In press. “What a language is good for: language socialization, language shift, and the persistence of code-specific genres in St. Lucia.” Language in society.Google Scholar
Garrett, P. B. and Baquedano-Lopez, P.. 2002. “Language socialization: reproduction and continuity, transformation and change.” Annual Review of Anthropology, 31: 339–361. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford 1986. Works and lives: the anthropologist as author. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Genesee, F. 1989. “Early bilingual development: one language or two.” Child Language 16: 161–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genishi, C. 1981. “Code-switching in Chicano six year olds.” In Duran, R. (ed.), Latino language and communicative behavior, 133–152. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre, and Susan, Goldin-Meadow (eds.). 2003. Language in mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gipper, Helmut. 1972. Gibt es ein sprachliches Relativitätsprinzip? Untersuchungen zur Sapir-Whorf-Hypothese. Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar
Gladstone, William E. 1858. Studies on Homer and the Homeric age. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. 1961. An introduction to descriptive linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Glieck, James. 1987. Chaos: making a new science. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Tara. 1997. Two languages at work: bilingual life on the production floor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, Ward. 1964 (1957). “Cultural anthropology and linguistics.” In Hymes, D. (ed.), Language in culture and society, 36–39. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goodenough, Ward 1971. Culture, language and society. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Goodenough, Ward 1981. Culture, language, and society. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
Goodman, Morris F. 1964. A comparative study of Creole French dialects. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Goodman, Morris F. 1984. “Are creole structures innate?” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 7(2): 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Morris F. 1987. “Pidgin origins reconsidered.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 2(2): 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Morris F. 1988. “A response to Naro.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 3(1): 10–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie. 1993. “Tactical uses of stories: participation frameworks within boys' and girls' disputes.” In Tannen, D. (ed.), Gender, 110–143. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, Esther. 1995. Social intelligence and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, Jack. 1977. The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack 1989. The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodz, N. 1989. “Parental language mixing in bilingual families.” Infant Mental Health Journal 10(1): 25–44.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew and Jeffrey, Heath. 1998. “Sex, sound symbolism and sociolinguistics.” Current Anthropology 39 (4): 421–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gossen, Gary. 1974. “‘To speak with a heated heart’: Chamula canons of style and good performance.” In Richard, Bauman and Joel, Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 389–413. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Alma and Philip, Graham. 1994. Parallel worlds: an anthropologist and a writer encounter Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grether, W. F. 1939. “Color vision and color blindness in monkeys.” Comparative Psychology Monographs 15: 1–38.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grillo, Ralph. 1989. Dominant languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grin, François. 1999. Compétences et récompenses: la valeur des langues en Suisse. Fribourg: Éditions universitaires Fribourg.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1990. Jacques Lacan: a feminist introduction. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruppe, Otto Friedrich. 1831 (1914). O. F. Gruppe Philosophische Werke. I. Antäus. Fritz, Mauthner (ed.). Munich: Georg Müller.Google Scholar
Gudschinsky, Sarah. 1967. How to learn an unwritten language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gulya, Janos. 1974. “Some eighteenth century antecedents of nineteenth century linguistics: the discovery of Finno-Ugrian.” In Dell, Hymes (ed.), Studies in the history of linguistics: traditions and paradigms, 258–276. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. 1964. “Speech variation and the study of Indian civilization.” In Dell, Hymes (ed.), Language in culture and society, 416–428. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John 1971. Language in social groups. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John 1982a. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John (ed.). 1982b. Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John 1992. “Contextualization and understanding.” In Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon, 229–252. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. and Stephen, C. Levinson. 1991. “Rethinking linguistic relativity.” Current Anthropology 32(5): 613–622. [Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundation of Language, 17.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. and Stephen, C. Levinson (eds.). 1996. Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary. 1998. Interview with Stephen O. Murray. Anthropological Linguistics 39 (4): 695–713.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1983. “Interpretive social science vs. hermeneuticism.” In Norma, Haanet al. (eds.), Social science as moral inquiry, 251–269. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1993. The structural transformation of the public sphere, an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hage, Per and Kristen, Hawkes. 1975. “Binumarin color categories.” Ethnology 24: 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Kira and Mary, Bucholtz (eds.). 1995. Gender Articulated, Language the Socially Constructed Self. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira, Mary, Bucholtz, and Birch, Moonwoman (eds.). 1992. Locating power: proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley Women and Language Group: Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Hamill, James F. 1990. Ethno-logic: the anthropology of human reasoning. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 1998. “Whose were the Tocharians? Linguistic subgrouping and diagnostic idiosyncrasy.” In Victor, H. Mair (ed.), The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age peoples of eastern Central Asia, 307–346. (Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph no. 26). Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ian F. 1986. “The domestic hypothesis, diffusion and componentiality: an account of Atlantic Anglophone creole origins.” In Muysken, P. and Smith, N. (eds.), Substrata versus universals in creole genesis, 71–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, William. 1990. Referential practice: language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William 1995. Language and communicative practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William 1996. “Language form and communicative practices.” In John, J. Gumperz and Stephen, C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 232–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language, 17.]Google Scholar
Hanson, Miriam. 1993. “Foreward.” In Oskar, Negt and Alexander, Kluge, Public sphere and experience, toward an analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public sphere, ix-xli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Harkness, Sara. 1973. “Universal aspects of learning color codes: a study in two cultures.” Ethos 2: 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, Sara 1992. “Human development in psychological anthropology.” In Schwartz, T., White, G., and Lutz, C. (eds.), New directions in psychological anthropology, 102–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harkness, Sara and Charles M. Super. 1996. Introduction. In Harkness, S. and Super, C. M. (eds.), Parents' cultural belief systems: their origins, expressions, and consequences, 1–23. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. and Lyle, Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Marvin. 1968. The rise of anthropological theory. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Hart, R. A. and G. T. Moore. 1973. “The development of spatial cognition: a review.” In Downs, R. M. and Stea, D. (eds.), Image and environment: cognitive mapping and spatial behavior, 246–288. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Harvey, Keith and Celia, Shalom (eds.). 1997. Language and desire, encoding sex, romance and intimacy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haviland, John, and Stephen, C. Levinson (eds.). 1994. Spatial conceptualization in Mayan languages. Special issue of Linguistics, 42(4/5).
Hawkes, David. 1967. A little primer of Tu Fu. Oxford: Renditions Paperback.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. 1982. “What no bedtime story means: narrative skill at home and school.” Language in Society 11: 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. B. 1983. Ways with words: language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heider, Eleanor Rosch. 1972a. “Universals in color naming and memory.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 93: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, Eleanor Rosch 1972b. “Probabilities, sampling and the ethnographic method: the case of Dani colour names.” Man 7: 448–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, Eleanor Rosch and Donald, C. Olivier. 1972. “The structure of the color space for naming and memory in two languages.” Cognitive Psychology 3: 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, Albert C. 1972. “A non-European system of color classification.” Anthropological Linguistics 14: 220–227.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica (ed.). 1988. Codeswitching: anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Monica 1989. “Aspects sociolinguistiques de la francisation d'une entreprise montréalaise.” Sociologie et sociétés 21(2): 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Monica 2002a. “L'écologie et la sociologie du langage.” In Annette, Boudreau, Lise, Dubois, Jacques, Maurais and Grant, McConnell (eds.), L'Écologie des langues. Ecology of languages, 175–192. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica 2002b. Éléments d'une sociolinguistique critique. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica and Laurette, Lévy. 1994. “Mariages linguistiquement mixtes: les stratégies des femmes franco-ontariennes.” Langage et société 67: 53–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Monica and Marilyn, Martin-Jones (eds.). 2001. Voices of authority: education and linguistic difference. Greenwood CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica and Carol Pfaff. 1996. “Code-switching and code-mixing.” In Peter, Nelde, Hans, Goebl, Wolfgang, Wölck and Stary, Z. (eds.), Internationales Handbuch der Kontaktlinguistik, 594–610. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hendel, Charles W. 1955. “Introduction.” In Ernst, Cassirer, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. I. Language. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1–65.Google Scholar
Hendrikson, John. 2001. “Pushkin and the Koran: Dialogic imagination.” Pushkin Review.Google Scholar
Herdt, Gilbert (ed.). 1994. Third sex, third gender, beyond sexual dimorphism in culture and history. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan, Deborah A. Johnson, and Tamra DiBenedetto. 1995. “This discussion is going too far!: Male resistance to female participation on the internet” In Hall, and Bucholtz, (eds.). Gender Articulated, 67–96. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herskovits, Melville J. 1975. Life in a Haitian valley. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael. 1985. The poetics of manhood: context and identity in a Cretan mountain village. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Heynick, Frank. 1983. “From Einstein to Whorf: space, time, matter, and reference frames in physical and linguistic relativity.” Semiotica 45(1–2): 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickerson, Nancy. 1975. “Two studies of color: implications for cross-cultural comparability of semantic categories.” In Kinkade, D., Hale, K. and Werner, O. (eds.). Linguistics and anthropology: in honor of C. F. Voegelin, 317–330. Lisse: de Ridder.Google Scholar
Higonnet, Patrice. 1980. “The politics of linguistic terrorism and grammatical hegemony during the French Revolution.” Social Theory 5: 41–69.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane. 1988. “Language, culture and world view.” In Newmeyer, F. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. IV: Language: The cultural context, 14–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane 1995. “The eighteen voices of Don Gabriel: Responsibility and self in a modern Mexican narrative.” In Tedlock and Mannheim (eds.), 97–147.
Hill, Jane and Kenneth, Hill. 1986. Speaking mexicano: dynamics of syncretic language in central Mexico. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane and Bruce, Mannheim. 1992. “Language and world view.” Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1990. Nations and nationalism since 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics, 2nd ed. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Johann Baptist. 1966. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Griechischen. München: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas. 1980. Gödel, Escher, Bach: an eternal golden braid. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Hoijer, Harryet al. (ed.) 1946. Linguistic structures of native America. New York: The Vilecing Fund.Google Scholar
Hoijer, Harryet al. (ed.). 1954. Language in culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holden, Constance. 2004. “Life without numbers in the Amazon.” Science 305: 1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, Dorothy and Naomi, Quinn (eds.). 1987. Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Dorothy, William, Lachicotte Jr., Debra, Skuiner, and Carole, Cain 1998. Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. (ed.). 1982. Tense-aspect: between semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Typological Studies in Language, 1.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Paul. 1888 [1974]. August Friedrich Pott (necrology). Einleitung in die allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, by A. G. Pott; newly edited together with a bio-bibliographical sketch of Pott by Paul Horn, by E. F. K. Koerner. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard, Andrew, Rosta, Jasper, Holmes, and Nikolas, Gisborne. 1996. “Synonyms and syntax.” Journal of Linguistics 32: 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugh-Jones, Christine. 1988. From the Milk River: spatial and temporal processes in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1795 (1903). “Theorie der Bildung des Menschen.” In Albert, Leitzmann (ed.), Wilhelm von Humboldts Gesammelte Schriften, i.282–287. Berlin: B. Behr.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von 1820 (1905). “Ueber das vergleichende Sprachstudium in Beziehung auf die verschiedenen Epochen der Sprachentwicklung.” In Albert, Leitzmann (ed.), Wilhelm von Humboldts Gesammelte Schriften, iv.1–34. Berlin: B. Behr.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von 1825 (1906). “Notice sur une grammaire japonaise imprimée à Mexico.” In Albert, Leitzmann (ed.), Wilhelm von Humboldts Gesammelte Schriften, v.237–248. Berlin: B. Behr.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von 1829 (1907). “Von dem grammatischen Baue der Sprachen.” In Albert, Leitzmann (ed.), Wilhelm von Humboldts Gesammelte Schriften, vi.337–486. Berlin: B. Behr.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von 1836 (1988). On language: the diversity of human language-structure and its influence on the development of mankind. Peter Heath, trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunn, E. 1985. “The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification.” In Dougherty, J. W. D. (ed.), Directions in cognitive anthropology, 117–40. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hunn, E. 1995. “Ethnoecology: the relevance of cognitive anthropology for human ecology.” In Blount, B. (ed.), Language, culture, and society. 2nd edition, 439–455. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin. 1980. Culture and inference. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin 1983. “Understanding Micronesian navigation.” In Gentner, D. and Stevens, A. L. (eds.), Mental models, 191–225. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hutton, Christopher M. 1999. Linguistics and the Third Reich: mother-tongue fascism, race and the science of language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huxley, Aldous. 1937. “Words and behaviour.” The olive tree, 84–103. New York and London: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1961. “On typology of cognitive styles in language.” Anthropological Linguistics 3 (1): 22–54.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell (ed.). 1964. Language in culture and society: a reader in linguistics and anthropology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell 1966. “Two types of linguistic relativity.” In William, Bright (ed.), Sociolinguistics, 114–167. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell 1981. “In vain I tried to tell you.” Essays in native American ethnopoetics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell and John Fought. 1975. “American structuralism.” In Thomas, Sebeok (ed.), Current trends in linguistics: historiography of linguistics, 903–1176, 13. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hymes, Virginia. 1987. “Warm Springs Sahaptin narrative analysis.” In Joel, Sherzer and Anthony, Woodbury (eds.), Native American discourse: poetics and rhetoric, 62–102. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith. 1990. “Registering affect: heteroglossia in the linguistic expression of emotion.” In Lutz (ed.), Language and the politics of emotion, 126–161.Google Scholar
Isidore of Seville. 1957. Etymologiarum sive originum libri XX. Lindsay, W. M. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 1999. Ideologies in action: language politics on Corsica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1959 (1971). “Boas' view of grammatical meaning.” In Roman, Jakobson, Selected writings. ii, 490–496. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman 1960 (1971). “The Kazan' school of Polish linguistics.” In Jakobson, Roman, Selected writings. ii, 394–428. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman 1960. “Linguistics and poetics.” In Thomas, E. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman 1982 (1985). “Einstein and the science of language.” In Roman, Jakobson, Selected writings. vii, 254–264. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman 1987. Language in literature. Krystyna, Pomorska and Stephen, Rudy (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman 1990. “Langue and parole: code and message.” In Linda, Waugh and Monique, Monville-Burston (eds.), On language, Roman Jakobson, 80–109. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Judith R. and Dan, L. Slobin. 1979. “The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish.” Journal of Child Language 6: 529–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joseph, John. 1996. “The immediate sources of the Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis.” Historiographia Linguistica 23: 365–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jourdan, Christine. 1983. “Mort du Kanaka Pidgin English à Mackay (Australie).” Anthropologie et sociétés 7 (3): 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jourdan, Christine 1985. “Sapos Yumi Mitim Yumi: urbanization and creolization of Solomon Islands pidgin.” Ph. D. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.
Jourdan, Christine 1988. “Langue de personne, langue de tout le monde: le Pijin à Honiara (Iles Salomon).” Etudes Créoles 11(2): 128–147.Google Scholar
Jourdan, Christine 1991. “Pidgins and creoles: the blurring of categories.” Annual Review of Anthropology 20: 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jourdan, Christine 1994. “Créolisation, urbanisation et identité aux îles Salomons.” Journal de la Société des Océanistes 99: 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jourdan, Christine 2000. “‘My nephew is my aunt’: features and transformations of kinship terminology in Solomon Islands pijin.” In Jeff, Siegel (ed.), Processes of language contact. Montreal: Fides, 99–121.Google Scholar
Jourdan, Christine 2001. “Contact.” In Duranti, S. (ed.), Key terms in language and culture, 40–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jourdan, Christine In press. “The cultural in pidgin genesis.” In Singler, J. and Kouwenberg, S. (eds.), The handbook of pidgins and creoles. London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Jourdan, Christine and Roger, Keesing. 1997. “From Fisin to Pijin: creolization in progress in the Solomon Islands.” Language in Society 26: 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junod, Henri A. 1927. The life of a South African tribe. New York: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991 (1768) “Von dem Ersten Grunde des Unterschiedes der Gegenden im Raume” (Translation “On the first ground of the distinction of regions in space.”) In The philosophy of right and left, 27–33. Cleve, J. and Frederick, R. E. (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul. 1975. “Synchronic variability and diachronic change in basic color terms.” Language in Society 4: 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul 1996. “Intra-speaker relativity.” In John, J. Gumperz and Stephen, C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 97–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul 1999. “The emergence of basic color lexicons hypothesis.” In Alexander, Borg (ed.), The language of colour in the Mediterranean, 76–90. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul (in press) “Color categories are not arbitrary.” Color cognition and culture a special issue of the Journal of Cross-Cultural Research, ed. Kimberly Jameson and Nancy Alvarado.
Kay, Paul and Brent, Berlin. 1997. “Science? Imperialism: there are non-trivial constraints on color categorization.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul and Luisa, Maffi. 1999. “Color appearance and the emergence and evolution of basic color lexicons.” American Anthropologist 101: 743, 760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul and Chad, K. McDaniel. 1978. “The linguistic significance of the meanings of basic color terms.” Language 54: 610–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul and Willett, Kempton. 1984. “What is the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis?” American Anthropologist 86: 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul, Brent, Berlin, and William, Merrifield. 1991. “Biocultural implications of systems of color naming.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 1: 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul and Terry, Regier. 2003. Resolving the question of color naming universals (pdf). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 100, 9085–9089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul, Brent Berlin, Luisa Maffi, and William Merrifield. 1997. “Color naming across languages.” In Hardin, C. L. and Luisa, Maffi (eds.), Color categories in thought and language, 21–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul, Brent, Berlin, Luisa, Maffi, and William, Merrifield 2005. The world color survey. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth. 1994. “Language, gender, rank, and social space: honorifics in Pohnpei, Micronesia.” In Mary, Bucholtz (ed.), Cultural performances: proceedings of the third Berkeley women and language conference, 367–377. Berkeley: Berkeley Woman and Language Press.Google Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth 1998. Power sharing: language, rank, gender and social space in Pohnpei, Micronesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keesing, Roger. 1972. “Paradigms lost: the new anthropology and the new linguistics.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 28(4): 299–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keesing, Roger 1981. Cultural anthropology: a contemporary perspective. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
Keesing, Roger 1987. “Models, ‘folk’ and ‘cultural’: paradigms regained?” In Holland, D. and Quinn, N. (eds.), Cultural models in language and thought, 369–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keesing, Roger 1988. Melanesian pidgin and the oceanic substrate. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Keesing, Roger 1992. “Anthropology and linguistics.” In Pütz, M. (ed.), Thirty years of linguistic evolution, 593–602. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keesing, Roger 1993. “The lens of enchantment.” Culture 13(1): 57–59.Google Scholar
Keil, Frank. 1984. “Of pidgins and pigeons.” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 7(2): 197–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Charles M. and Janet, Dixon Keller. 1996. Cognition and tool use: the blacksmith at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On language change: the invisible hand in language. Trans. Brigitte Nerlich. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, Clyde. 1961. Anthropology and the classics. Providence: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, Clyde and William, H. Kelly. 1945. “The concept of culture.” In The science of man in the world crisis, 78–107. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Knobloch, Clemens. 2000. “Begriffspolitik und Wissenschaftsrhetorik bei Leo Weisgerber.” In Klaus, D. Dutz (ed.), Interpretation und re-interpretation. Aus Anlass des 100. Geburtstages von Johann Leo Weisgerber (1899–1985), 145–174. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad. 1977. “The Humboldtian trend in linguistics.” In Paul, J. Hopper (ed.), Studies in descriptive and historical linguistics: Festschrift for Winfred P. Lehmann, 145–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Series iv, 4.]Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad 1982. “The Neogrammarian doctrine: breakthrough or extension of the Schleicherian paradigm.” In Maher, J. Peter, Allan, R. Bombard and Koerner, E. F. K. (eds.), Papers from the 3rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 129–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad (ed.). 1992. “The Sapir–Whorf hypothesis: a preliminary history and a bibliographic essay.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2: 173–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, Philip L. 1998. “Nationalism and archaeology: on the constructions of nations and the reconstructions of the remote past.” Annual Review of Anthropology 27: 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, Sylvia. 2004. L1 transfer and the cut-off point for L2 acquisition: processes in creole formation. Paper presented in the Montréal Dialogues conference, August.
Krahe, Hans. 1960. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft, I. Einleitung und Lautlehre. Berlin: Sammlung Göschen.Google Scholar
Krauss, Robert M. 1968. “Language as a symbolic process.” American Scientist 56: 265–278.Google ScholarPubMed
Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Language in desire, a semiotic approach to literature and art. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1978. “Toward a theory of social dialect variation.” Language in Society 7: 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Karl. 1997. Traditional literatures of the American Indian: texts and interpretations. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, P. (ed.). 2000. Regimes of language: ideologies, polities, and identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Kulick, D. 1992. Language shift and cultural reproduction: socialization, self, and syncretism in a Papua New Guinean Village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don and Bambi B. Schieffelin. 2004. “Language socialization.” In Duranti, A. (ed.) A companion to linguistic anthropology, 349–368. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kurytowicz, Jerzy. 1964. The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kurytowicz, Jerzy 1966. “La nature des procès dits ‘analogiques’.” In Eric, P. Hamp, Fred, W. Householder and Robert, Austerlitz (eds.), Readings in linguistics II, 158–174. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuschel, Rolf and Torben, Monberg. 1974. “‘We don't talk much about colour here’: a study of colour semantics on Bellona Island.” Man 9: 213–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1981. “Resolving the neogrammarian controversy.” Language 57(2): 267–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William 1984. “Intensity.” In Shiffrin, D. (ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: linguistic applications, 43–70. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Literature. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1991. “The three dialects of English.” In Penelope, Eckert (ed.), New ways of analyzing sound change, 1–44. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1994. Principles of linguistic change, Volume 1. Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2001. Principles of linguistic change, Volume 2. Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1977a. “The signification of the phallus.” Ecrits, a selection, 281–291. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques 1977b. “The agency of the letter in the unconscious or reason since Freud.” Ecrits, a selection, 146–178. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal, Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Lafont, Robert. 1997. Quarante ans de sociolinguistique à la périphérie. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and other dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark, Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lallot, Jean. 1991. “ΕΤΥΜΟΛΟΓΙΑ: L'étymologie en Grèce ancienne d'Homère aux grammairiens alexandrins.” In Jean-Pierre, Chambon and Georges, Lüdi (eds.), Discours étymologiques: actes du colloque international organisé à l'occasion du centenaire de la naissance de Walther von Wartburg, 135–147. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Landry, Rodrigue and Réal Allard. 1996. “Vitalité ethnolinguistique: une perspective dans l'étude de la francophonie canadienne.” In Jürgen, Erfurt (ed.), De la polyphonie à la symphonie. Méthodes, théories et faits de la recherche pluridisciplinaire sur le français au Canada, 61–88. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurendeau, Monique and Adrien, Pinard. 1970. The development of the concept of space in the child. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean. 1988. Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean and Wenger, E.. 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentil, Pierre. 1969. “Compte rendu de Richard Lemay. A propos de l'origine arabe de l'art des troubadours.” Romania 90: 425–426.Google Scholar
Leap, William (ed.). 1995. Beyond the lavender lexicon: authenticity, imagination, and appropriation in lesbian and gay languages. Buffalo, N. Y.: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Leavitt, John. 1991. “The shapes of modernity.” Culture 11(1–2): 29–42.Google Scholar
Leavitt, John (ed.). 1997. Poetry and prophecy: the anthropology of inspiration. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Benjamin. 1997. Talking heads, language, metalanguage and the semiotics of subjectivity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Dorothy Demetracopoulou. 1938. “Conceptual implications of an Indian language.” Philosophy of Science 5: 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Dorothy Demetracopoulou 1944. “Linguistic reflection of Wintu thought.” International Journal of American Linguistics 10: 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Penny. 1991. “Whorf's Hopi tensors: subtle articulators in the language/thought nexus?” Cognitive Linguistics 2: 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Penny 1996. The Whorf theory complex: a critical reconstruction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Amsterdam Studies in Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Series iii, 81.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire. 1984. “Grammaires en contact: définition et perspectives de recherche.” Revue québécoise de linguistique 14(1): 11–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire 1986. “Relexification in creole genesis revisited: the case of Haitian Creole.” In Pieter, C. Muysken and Norval, Smith (eds.), Substrata versus universals in creole genesis, 279–301. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire 1998. Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: the case of Haitian creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire 2004. Issues in the study of pidgins and creoles. Studies in language comparison series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire and John, S. Lumsden. 1989. “Les langues créoles et la théorie linguistique.” In “La créolisation. Theme issue.” Revue canadienne de linguistique 34(3): 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1983. Wine and conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lemay, Richard. 1966. “A propos de l'origine arabe de l'art des troubadours.” Annales Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations 21: 990–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, Alaina. 2000. Between two fires: gypsy performance and Romani memory from Pushkin to postsocialism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric H. 1953. “Cognition in ethnolinguistics.” Language 29: 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, Erik H. and John M. Roberts. 1956. The language of experience: a study in methodology. Memoir 13 of International Journal of American Linguistics.
Leroy-Turcan, Isabelle. 1991. Introduction à l'étude du “Dictionnaire étymologique ou Origines de la langue française” de Gilles Ménage (1694). Les étymologies de Ménage: science et fantaisie. Lyon: Centre d'études linguistiques Jacques Goudet.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1995. “Cognitive anthropology.” In Verschueren, J., Ostman, J.-O., and Blommaert, J. (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 100–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1996a. “Relativity in spatial conception and description.” In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 177–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1996b. “Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: crosslinguistic evidence.” In Paul, Bloom, Mary, A. Peterson, Lynn, Nadell, and Merrill, F. Garrett (eds.), Language and space, 109–169. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1996c. “Language and space.” Annual Review of Anthropology 25: 353–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1997a. “Language and cognition: The cognitive consequences of spatial description in Guugu Yimithirr.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7(1): 98–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1997b. “From outer to inner space: linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking.” In Nuyts, J. and Pederson, E. (eds.), Language and conceptual representation, 13–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1998. “Studying spatial conceptualization across cultures: anthropology and cognitive science.” In E. Danziger (ed.), Language, space and culture, special issue. Ethos 26(1): 7–24.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1999. “The theory of basic color terms and Yélî Dnye.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10: 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2003a. Space in language and cognition: explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2003b. “Language and mind: let's get the issues straight!” In Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.), Language in mind, 25–46. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. and Penelope, Brown. 1994. “Immanuel Kant among the Tenejapans: anthropology as empirical philosophy.” Ethos 22(1): 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. and David, Wilkins (eds.) (in press). Grammars of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., Sotaro, Kita, Daniel, Haun, and Rasch, B.. 2002. “Returning the tables: language affects spatial reasoning.” Cognition 84: 155–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1960. “Four Winnebago myths: a structural sketch.” In Stanley, Diamond (ed.), Culture in history: essays in honor of Paul Radin, 351–362. New York: Published for Brandeis University by Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1967. The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Levy, Robert I. 1984. “Emotion, knowing, and culture.” In Shweder, R. A. and Levine, R. A. (eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion, 214–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Philip. 1984. The biology and evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge studies in linguistics, 23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David 1997. “Catastrophic change and learning theory.” Lingua 100: 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Bruce. 1999. Theorizing myth: narrative, ideology and scholarship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina. 1989. “Social network integration and language change in progress in a rural alpine village.” Language in society 18: 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liss, Julia E. 1996. “German culture and German science in the Bildung of Franz Boas.” In George, W. Stocking Jr. (ed.), Volksgeist as Method and ethic: essays on Boasian ethnography and the German anthropological tradition, 155–184. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Livia, Anna and Kira, Hall (eds.). 1997. Queerly phrased, language, gender and sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lock, A. 1981. The guided reinvention of language. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Paul E. and David. V. Trotman. (2002). “Enslaved Africans and their expectations of slave life in the Americas.” In Shepherd, V. and Richards, G. (eds.), Questioning creole: creolisation discourses in Caribbean culture, 67–88. Kingston: Ian Randle Publishers.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, Tom and Knut, Rasmussen. 1973. Eskimo poems from Canada and Greenland. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1985. “Whorf's view of the linguistic mediation of thought.” In Blount, B. (ed.), Language, culture, and society. 2nd edn, 415–438. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1992a. Language diversity and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1992b. Grammatical categories and cognition: a case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. (ed.). 1993. Reflexive language: reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1996. “The scope of linguistic relativity: an analysis and review of empirical research.” In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 37–69. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1997a. “The linguistics of ‘color’.” In Hardin, C. L. and Luisa, Maffi (eds.), Color categories in thought and language, 320–346. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1997b. “Linguistic relativity.” Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. and Suzanne Gaskins, 2001. “It's later than you think: the role of language-specific categories in the development of classification behavior.” In Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development, 257–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. and Suzanne Gaskins 2003. “Interaction of language type and referent type in the development of nonverbal classification preferences.” In Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.), Language in mind, 465–492. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, John and Shweder, R. A.. 1979. “Whorf and his critics: linguistic and nonlinguistic influences on color memory.” American Anthropologist 81: 581–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. and James V. Wertsch. 1987. “Vygotsky and Whorf: A comparative analysis.” In Maya, Hickmann (ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought, 67–86. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. and James, V. Wertsch 1988. “The effect of incidental conversation on memory for focal colors.” American Anthropologist 90: 923–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüdtke, Helmut. 1986. “Esquisse d'une théorie du changement langagier.” La linguistique 22 fasc. 1: 3–46.Google Scholar
Lutz, Catherine. 1990. “Engendering emotion: gender, power and rhetoric of emotional control in American discourse.” In Lutz, C. (ed.), Language and the politics of emotion, 69–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John 1999. “The vocabulary of colour with particular reference to ancient Greek and classical Latin.” In Alexander, Borg (ed.), The language of colour in the Mediterranean, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Marion. 1990. “We are not French!.” London: Routledge.Google ScholarPubMed
Mackey, William. 1968. The description of bilingualism. In Joshua, Fishman (ed.), Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton, 554–584.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine. 1993. Only words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacLaury, Robert E. 1986. “Color in Meso-America: vol I. A theory of composite categorization.” Unpublished Ph. D. thesis. University of California, Berkeley.
MacLaury, Robert E. 1987. “Color-category evolution and Shuswap yellow-with-green.” American Anthropologist 89: 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLaury, Robert E. 1997. Color and cognition in Mesoamerica. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Maffi, Luisa. 1990a. “Cognitive anthropology and human categorization research: the case of color.” Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.
Maffi, Luisa 1990b. “Somali color term evolution: grammatical and semantic evidence.” Anthropological Linguistics 32: 316–334.Google Scholar
Maffi, Luisa and C. L. Hardin. 1997. “Closing thoughts.” In Hardin, C. L. and Luisa, Maffi (eds.), Color categories in thought and language, 347–372. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa. 2002. “Frames of reference and language concepts.” Trends in Cognitive Science, 6(12): 503–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D., and Levinson, S.. 2004. “Can language restructure cognition? The case for space.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 108–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malkiel, Yakov. 1974. “Editorial comment: a Herder–Humboldt–Sapir–Whorf hypothesis?” Romance Philology 28: 199.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov 1977. “Etymology and general linguistics.” In Rüdiger, Schmitt (ed.), Etymologie, 347–376. Darmstadt: Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov 1993. Etymology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkoc, Gohkan. 2003. “Color categories and the structure of color space.” Ph. D. thesis. University of Nevada at Reno.
Malkoc, G., P. Kay, and M. A. Webster. 2002. “Individual differences in unique and binary hues.” OSA Fall Vision Meeting, Palace of Fine Arts, San Francisco, CA.
Malkoc, G., Webster, M. A., and Kay, P.. 2002. “Individual differences in color categories.” 2nd Annual Meeting of Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.Google Scholar
Malotki, Ekkehart. 1983. Hopi Time: a linguistic analysis of the temporal concepts in the Hopi language. Berlin: Mouton. [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 20.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce. 1991. The language of the Incas since the European invasion. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1984. “Special evidence for innateness.” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 7(2): 199–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Laura. 1986. “Eskimo words for snow: a case study in the genesis and decay of an anthropological example.” American Anthropologist 88: 418–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André. 1964. Économie des changements phonétiques; traité de phonologie diachronique. Berne: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James. 1978. Variational semantics in Tibeto-Burman. Philadelphia: Institute for the study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James 1990. “On megalocomparison.” Language 66(1): 106–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuzawa, T. 1985. “Colour naming and classification in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).” Journal of Human Evolution 14: 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiesen, F. O. 1941. American renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McClure, Erica. 1977. “Aspects of code-switching in the discourse of bilingual Mexican-American children.” In Saville-Troike, M. (ed.), Linguistics and anthropology: Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics, 93–115. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
McClure, Erica 1981. “Formal and functional aspects of the code-switched discourse of bilingual children.” In Richard, Duran (ed.), Latino language and communicative behavior, 69–94. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1988. “Language and gender.” In Frederick, J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: the Cambridge survey, IV. Language: the socio-cultural context, 75–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Terrence J. 1996. “Introduction.” In The historic turn in the human sciences, 1–14. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, Laraine, Soonja, Choi, and Jean, M. Mandler. 2003. “Understanding spatial relations: flexible infants lexical adults.” Cognitive Psychology 46: 229–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaughlin, B. 1984. “Early bilingualism: methodological and theoretical issues.” In Paradis, M. and Lebrun, Y. (eds.), Early bilingualism and child development, 19–45. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 1970. The acquisition of language: the study of developmental psycholinguistics. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John. 1992. “Substratal influences on Saramaccan.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 7(1): 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John 1998. “Identifying the creole prototype: vindicating a typological class.” Language.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John 2001. “The world's simplest grammars are creole grammars.” Linguistic Typology 5(3/4): 125–156.Google Scholar
Meek, B. 2001. “Kaska language socialization, acquisition and shift.” Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of Arizona.
Meeuwis, Michael and Jan, Blommaert. 1994. “The ‘Markedness Model’ and the absence of society: remarks on codeswitching.” Multilingua 14(4): 387–423.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1954 [1925]. La méthode comparative en linguistique historique. (Instituttet for sammenlingnende kulturforskning, Oslo. Ser. A: Forelesninger 2) Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine 1964. Introduction à l'étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. University, Ala.: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Menocal, María Rosa. 1982. “The etymology of Old Provençal trobar, trobador: a return to the ‘third solution’.” Romance Philology 36 (2): 137–148.Google Scholar
Menocal, María Rosa 1984. “The mysteries of the Orient: special problems in Romance etymology.” In Philip, Baldi (ed.), Papers from the Ⅻth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 501–515. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Menocal, María Rosa 1987. The Arabic role in medieval literary history: a forgotten heritage.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merwin, William S. 1979. Selected translations. New York: Athaneum.Google Scholar
Merwin, William S. 1998. East window. The Asian translations. Port Townsend: Copper Canyon Press.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2000. Constraints on null subjects in Bislama (Vanuatu). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1992 [1935]. Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. (6th edition). Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universtitäsverlag.Google Scholar
Miller, George A. and Philip, N. Johnson-Laird. 1976. Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Peggy J. 1982. Amy, Wendy, and Beth: learning language in South Baltimore. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Perry. 1967. “An American language.” In Nature's nation, 208–40. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Robert L. 1968. The linguistic relativity principle and Humboldtian ethnolinguistics: a history and appraisal. The Hague: Mouton. [Janua Linguarum, Series minor, 67.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara. 1995. Language and gender: interdisciplinary perspectives. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Milosz, Czeslaw (ed.). 1996. A book of luminous things. An international anthology of poetry. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1993. “On the social origins of language change.” Charles, Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: problems and perspectives, 215–236. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Language and social networks. 2nd edn. Oxford: New York: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mintz, Sidney W. 1971. “The socio-historical background to pidginization and creolization.” In Dell, Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages, 481–498. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mintz, Sidney W. 1974. Caribbean transformations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mintz, Sidney W. 1982. “Caribbean marketplaces and Caribbean history.” Radical History Review 27: 110–120.Google Scholar
Mintz, Sydney and Richard, Price. 1992. The birth of African-American culture: anthropological perspective. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Mishra, Ramesh C., Pierre, Dasen, and Shanta, Niraula. 2003. “Ecology, language, and performance on spatial cognitive tasks.” International Journal of Psychology 38(6): 366–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Juliet. 1974. Psychoanalysis and feminism, Freud, Reich, Laing and women. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Juliet 1985. “Introduction – 1.” In Juliet, Mitchell and Jacqueline, Rose (eds.). Feminine sexuality, Jaques Lacan and the école freudienne, 1–26. New York and London: Norton.Google Scholar
Moitt, Bernard. 2001. Women and slavery in the French Antilles, 1635–1848. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Monberg, Torben. 1971. “Tikopia color classification.” Ethnology 10: 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Clive. 1985. Kanaka Maratta: a history of Melansian Mackay. Port Moresby: Institute of Papua New Guinea studies and the University of Papua New Guinea Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1877. Ancient society. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Morissey, Marietta. 1989. Slave women in the New World: gender stratification in the Caribbean. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond and Edouard, Beniak. 1991. Linguistic consequences of language contact and restriction: the case of French in Ontario, Canada. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 1984. “The language bioprogram hypothesis, Creole studies, and linguistic theory.” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 7(2): 20–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko 1986. “The universalist and substrate hypotheses complement one another.” In Pieter, C. Muysken and Norval, Smith (eds.), Substrata versus universals in Creole genesis, 129–162. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko 1989. “Response to Bickerton.” The Carrier Pidgin 17(2,3): 6–7.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko (ed.). 1993. Africanisms in Afro-American language varieties. Athens/London: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko 1999. “On the language bioprogram hypothesis: hints from Tazie.” In DeGraff, M. (ed.), Language variation and language change: creolization, diachrony, and development, 95–127. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1978. “Samoan plantation pidgin English and the origin of Papua New Guinea pidgin.” Papers in pidgin and creole linguistics. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics 28(4): 67–120.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, John, Howard, Morphy, and Alison, Petch (eds.). 1997. “My Dear Spencer”: The letters of F. J. Gillen to Baldwin Spencer. Melbourne: Hyland.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O. 1994. Theory groups and the study of language in North America. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 1984. “Do creoles give insight into the human language faculty?” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 7(2): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter 1995. “Code-switching and grammatical theory.” In Lesley, Milroy and Pieter, Muysken (eds.), One speaker, two languages: cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching, 177–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter and Norval, Smith (eds.). 1986. Substrata versus universals in creole genesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter and Norval, Smith (eds.) 1990. “Question words in Pidgin and Creole languages.” Linguistics 28(4): 883–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1993a. Social motivations for code-switching: evidence from Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol 1993b. Duelling languages: grammatical structure in code-switching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo and Eminly, Nawood Rando. 1983. Meliglossa. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Naro, Anthony J. 1978. “Study of the origins of pidginization.” Language 54: 314–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naro, Anthony J. 1988. “A reply to Pidgin origins reconsidered” by Morris Goodman. Journal of Pidgins and Creole Languages 3(1): 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, Rodney. 1973. Right and left: essays on dual symbolic classification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (ed.). 1986. Event knowledge: structure and function in development. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Neumann-Holzschuh, Ingrid and Edgar, W. Schneider (eds.). 2000. Degrees of restructuring in creole languages. Creole language library, 22. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Newman, Stanley. 1954. “Semantic problems in grammatical systems and lexemes: a search for method.” In Hoijer, H. (ed.) Language in culture, 82–91. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newport, E. L., H. Gleitman and L. R. Gleitman. 1977. “Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style.” In Ferguson, C. and Snow, C. (eds.), Talking to children: language input and acquisition, 109–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nida, Eugene A. 1959. “Principles of translation as exemplified by Bible translating.” In Reuben, A. Brower (ed.), On Translation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Niemeier, Susanne and René, Dirven (eds.). 2000. Evidence for linguistic relativity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis. 1996. Sounds like life: sound–symbolic grammar, performance, and cognition in Pastaza Quechua. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis 1999. “The case for sound symbolism.” Annual Review of Anthropology, 28: 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Flann. 1977. The hair of the dogma. London: Hart-Davis.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. 1982. “Talking to children in Western Samoa.” Language in Society 11: 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs E. 1985. “Variation and error: a sociolinguistic study of language acquisition in Samoa.” In Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 783–838. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. 1988. Culture and language development: language acquisition and language socialization in Samoan village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. 1990. “Cultural universals in the acquisition of language.” Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 29: 1–19Google Scholar
Ochs, E. 1993. “Constructing social identity: a language socialization perspective.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(3): 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. and B. B. Schieffelin. 1984. “Language acquisition and socialization: three developmental stories and their implications.” In Shweder, R. and Levine, R. (eds.), Culture theory: essays on mind, self and emotion, 276–320. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. B. 1989. “Language has a heart.” Text 9(1): 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.). 1990. Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and B. B. Schieffelin 1995. “The impact of language socialization on grammatical development.” In Fletcher, P. and Brian, MacWhinney (eds.), Handbook of child language, 73–94. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ogawa, Naoko and Janet, S. Smith. 1997. “The gendering of the gay male sex classing Japan: a case study based on Rasen No Sobyo.” In Livia and Hall, Queerly phrased, language, gender and sexuality, 402–415.Google Scholar
Öhman, Suzanne. 1953. “Theories of the ‘linguistic field’.” Word 9: 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohnuki-Tierney, Emiko. 1990. “Introduction: the historicization of anthropology.” In Emiko, Ohnuki-Tierney (ed.), Culture through time: anthropological approaches, 1–25. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Opland, Jeff. 1983. Xhosa oral poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orlove, Benjamin S. 1980. “Ecological anthropology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 9: 235–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortner, Sherry. 1984. “Theory in anthropology since the sixties.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 26: 126–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osthoff, H. and Brugmann, K.. 1878 [1974]. Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen. Erster Theil. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Paris, Gaston. 1909. Mélanges linguistiques. Latin vulgaire et langues romanes; langue française; notes étymologiques. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Parmentier, Richard. 1993. “The political function of reported speech: a Belauan example.” In J. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive language, 261–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, Peter. 1999. Urban Jamaican creole: variation in the mesolect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paugh, Amy. 2001. “‘Creole day is every day’: language socialization, shift, and ideologies in Dominica, West Indies.” Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, New York University.
Paul, Hermann. 1920 [1960]. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. 6th edn. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger. 1983. A glance at the history of linguistics, with particular regard to the historical study of phonology. Trans. Caroline C. Henriksen; ed. with an introduction by Konrad Koerner. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pederson, Eric, Eve, Danziger, Stephen, Levinson, Sotaro, Kita, Gunter, Senft, and David, Wilkins. 1998. “Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization.” Language 74: 557–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1938–58. Collected papers, vols. 1–8, Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P. (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Penn, Julia M. 1972. Linguistic relativity versus innate ideas: the origins of the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis in German thought. The Hague: Mouton. [Janua Linguarum, series minor, 120.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesmen, Dale. 2000. Russia and soul. An exploration. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, Uwe. 1992. “Rasks Stellung in der Sprachwissenschaft.” In Rasmus, Rask; herausgegeben und übersetzt von Uwe Petersen (eds.), Von der Etymologie überhaupt: Eine Einleitung in die Sprachvergleichung, 9–29. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Philips, S. U. 1983. The invisible culture: communication in classroom and community on the Warm Springs Indian reservation. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Philips, S. U. 2001. “Power.” In Alessandro, Duranti (ed.). Key terms in language and culture, 190–192. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan, Susan, Steele, and Christine, Tanz (eds.). 1987. Language, gender and sex in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, Jean and Barbel, Inhelder. 1967 (1948). The child's conception of space. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Picard, Marc. 1987. An introduction to the comparative phonetics of English and French in North America. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pick, H., and Acredolo, L. (eds.). 1983. Spatial orientation: theory, research and application. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet and Paul Gross. 2003. “Community phonology.” (Presented at the 39th meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, April 12, 2003.)
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The language instinct: how the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinxten, R., Dooren, I., and Harvey, F.. 1983. The anthropology of space. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, M. 1986. “Social norms and lexical acquisition: a study of deictic verbs in Samoan Child Language.” In Schieffelin, B. B. and Ochs, E. (eds.), Language socialization across cultures, 127–151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Worterbuch. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 1988. “Contrasting patterns of code-switching in two communities.” In Monica, Heller (ed.), Codeswitching: anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives, 215–244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pott, August Friedrich. 1833–1836. Etymologische forschungen auf dem gebiete der indogermanischen sprachen, mit besonderem bezug auf die lautumwandlung im sanskrit, griechischen, lateinischen, littauischen und gothischen. Lemgo: Meyersche hof-buchhandlung. (2nd, completely revised version published in 1859–67).Google Scholar
Pott, August Friedrich 1856. Die Ungleichheit menschlicher Rassen haupt-sächlich vom Sprachwissenschaftlichen Standpunkte, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von des Grafen von Gobineau gleichnamigem Werke. Lemgo: Detmold, Meyer.Google Scholar
Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 1993. “‘Might be something’: the language of indeterminacy in Australian Aboriginal land use.” Man December 28(4): 679–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 2004. The cunning of recognition: indigenous alterity and the making of Australian multiculturalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Prattis, J. Iain (ed.). 1985. Reflections. The anthropological muse. Washington, D. C.: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Price, Charles and Elizabeth, Baker. 1976. “Origins of Pacific islands labourers in Queensland, 1863–1904.” Journal of Pacific History 9(1): 106–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard. 1983. First-time: the historical vision of an Afro-American people. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press ltd.Google Scholar
Prost, André. 1956. “La Langue Sonay.” Mémoires de l'Institut d'Afrique Noire#47. Dakar.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. 1959. “Proto-Indo-European reality and reconstruction.” Language 35(3): 421–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey. 1989. “The great Eskimo vocabulary hoax.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pütz, Martin and Marjolijn, Verspoor (eds.). 2000. Explorations in linguistic relativity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C. 1992. “The acquisition of K'iche' Maya.” In Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 221–308. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1969. Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, Naomi. 1991. “The cultural basis of metaphor.” In James, W. Fernandez (ed.), Beyond metaphor: the theory of tropes in anthropology, 56–93. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, Naomi 1996. “Culture and contradiction: the case of Americans reasoning about marriage.” Ethos 24: 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Naomi 1997. “The mainstreaming of cultural models.” Paper delivered at the plenary session: Psychological Anthropology: State of the Art, at the 1997 biennial meeting of the Society for Psychological Anthropology, Oct. 9–12, San Diego.
Ramanujan, A. K. 1967. The interior landscape. Love poems from the Classical Tamil anthology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ramanujan, A. K. 1969. The collected essays of A. K. Ramanujan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 2002. “Ritual and foreign language practices at school.” Language in Society 31(4): 491–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rask, Rasmus Kristian. 1992. Von der Etymologie überhaupt: Eine Einleitung in die Sprachvergleichung. Uwe Petersen, trans. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. (German tr. of Chapter 1 of Undersögelse om det gamle Nordiske eller Islandske Sprogs Oprindelse, publ. 1818).Google Scholar
Raudo, Emily Narwood and Donna, Jo Napoli (eds.). 1983. Meliglossa. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Ray, Verne. 1952. “Techniques and problems in the study of human color perception.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 8: 251–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, Verne 1953. “Human color perception and behavioral response.” Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences (series 2) 16: 98–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regier, Jerry, Paul, Kay, and Richard, S. Cook. 2005. “Focal colors are universal after all.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, 8386–8391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1987. Dimensions of a creole continuum: history, texts and linguistic analysis of Guyanese creole. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1978. “Explanation and understanding: on some remarkable connections among the theory of the text, theory of action, and theory of history.” In Charles, Reagan and David, Stewart (eds.), The philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: an anthology of his work, 149–166. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Ridington, Robin. 1991. “On the language of Benjamin Lee Whorf.” In Ivan, Brady (ed.), Anthropological poetics, 241–261. Savage: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Riley, K. C. 2001. “The emergence of dialogic identities: transforming heteroglossia in the Marquesas, F. P.” Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, City University of New York.
Rindler-Schjerve, Rosita (ed.). In press. Explorations in historical sociolinguistics: language and power in the Habsburg Empire. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roberson, Debi, Ian, Davies, and Jules, Davidoff. 2000. “Colour categories are not universal: replications and new evidence from a stone age culture.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129: 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, B. 1990. Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogoff, Barbara, and Jean, Lave (eds.). 1984. Everyday cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rogoff, Barbara and Gilda A. Morelli. 1994. “Cross-cultural perspectives on children's development.” In Bock, P. K. (ed.), Psychological anthropology, 231–242. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Roheim, Geza. 1973. Psychoanalysis and anthropology. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Roheim, Geza 1974. Children of the desert. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1989. Bilingualism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Romney, A. K. and Roy, G. D'Andrade (eds.). 1964. “Transcultural studies in cognition.” American Anthropologist 66(3), pt. 2.Google Scholar
Ronjat, J. 1913. Le développement du langage observé chez un enfant bilingue. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1982. “Method, social science and social hope.” Consequences of pragmatism (Essays: 1972–1980), 191–210. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1983. “Method and morality.” In Norma, Haanet al. (eds.), Social science as moral inquiry, 155–176. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1977. “Linguistic relativity.” In Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Wason, P. C. (eds.), Thinking: readings in cognitive science, 501–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor 1978. “Principles of categorization.” In Cognition and categorization, ed. Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B., 28–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Daniel. 1990. “Language in the discourse of the emotions.” In C. Lutz and L. Abu-Lughod, Language and the politics of emotions, 162–185.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm and Mark Durie. 1996. “Introduction.” In Mark, Durie and Malcolm, Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed: regularity and irregularity in language change, 3–38. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rossi-Landi, Ferruccio. 1973. Ideologies of linguistic relativity. The Hague: Mouton. [Approaches to Semiotics, 4.]Google Scholar
Roth Pierpont, Claudia. 2004. “The measure of America: how a rebel anthropologist waged war on racism.” The New Yorker, March 8, 2004, 48–63.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Jerome. 1967. Essays. Stony Brook, NY.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Jerome 1985. Technicians of the sacred. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Jerome 1986 (1972). Shaking the pumpkin. Traditional poetry of Indian North Americans. Revised edn. New York: Alfred van der March Editions.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Jerome and Diane, Rothenberg. 1983. Symposium of the whole. A range of discourse toward an ethnopoetics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel, A. Schegloff, and Gail, Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1976. “Colors and cultures.” Semiotica 16: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall 1981. Historical metaphors and mythical realities. Structure in the early history of the Sandwich Islands Kingdoms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall 2000. Culture in practice. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Samarin, William. 1982a. “Colonization and pidginization on the Ubangui river.” Journal of African languages and linguistics 4: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samarin, William 1982b. “Goals, roles, and language skills in colonizing Central Equatorial Africa.” Anthropological linguistics 24: 410–422.Google Scholar
Samarin, William 1989. The black man's burden: African colonial labor on the Congo and Ubangi Rivers 1880–1900. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sandell, J. H., Gross, C. G., and Bornstein, M. H.. 1979. “Color categories in macaques.” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 93: 626–635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sankoff, D., H. Cedergren, W. Kemp, P. Thibault, and D. Vincent. 1989. “Montréal French: language, class and ideology.” In Ralph, W. Fasold and Deborah, Schiffrin (eds.), Language change and variation, 107–118. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 1979. “The genesis of a language.” In Hill, K. C. (ed.), The genesis of language, 23–47. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian 1980. The social life of language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian 1990. “The grammaticalization of tense and aspect in Tok Pisin and Sranan.” Language variation and change 2(3): 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian and Suzanne Laberge. 1973. “On the acquisition of native speakers by a language.” Kivung 6 (1): 32–47 reprinted in Gillian, Sankoff (ed.), The social life of language, 195–209. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1907. “Herder's Ursprung der Sprache.” Modern Philology 5: 109–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1916. Time perspective in aboriginal American culture: a study in method. Ottawa: Canadian Geological Survey Memoir 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1921. Language: an introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1924 (1949). “The grammarian and his language.” In David, G. Mandelbaum (ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality, 150–159. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1925. “Emily Dickinson: a primitive.” Review of The complete poetry of Emily Dickinson. Poetry 26: 97–105.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1929a (1949). “The status of linguistics as a science.” In David, G. Mandelbaum (ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality, 160–166. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1929b (1949). “A study in phonetic symbolism.” In David, G. Mandelbaum (ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality, 61–72. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1933 (1949). “The psychological reality of phonemes.” In David, G. Mandelbaum (ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality, 46–60. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1949. Selected writings of Edward Sapir. David, Mandelbaum (ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1994. The psychology of culture: a course of lectures by Edward Sapir. Reconstructed and ed. Judith, T. Irvine. Berlin: M. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Saunders, B. A. C. and Brakel, J.. 1997. “Are there non-trivial constraints on colour categorization?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 167–228.Google Scholar
Saunders, Kay. 1974. “Uncertain bondage.” Ph. D. thesis. Brisbane: University of Queensland.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916 (1972). Cours de linguistique générale. Charles, Bally and Albert, Sechehaye (eds.). Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand 1960. “Souvenirs de F. de Saussure concernant sa jeunesse et ses études.” Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 17: 12–25.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de 1968. Cours de linguistique générale. Engler, R. (ed.). Wiesbaden: OttoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de 1974. Cours de linguistique générale. Appendice: Notes sur la linguistique générale. Engler, R.. (ed.). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C., and Robert, P. Abelson 1977. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: an enquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail, Jefferson, and Harvey, Sacks. 1977. “The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.” Language 53: 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi, B. 1985. “The acquisition of Kaluli.” In Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 525–594. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B. 1990. The give and take of everyday life: language socialization of Kaluli children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi, B. 1994. “Code-switching and language socialization: some probable relationships.” In Duchan, J., Hewitt, L. E., and Sonnenmeier, R. M. (eds.), Pragmatics: From theory to practice, 20–42. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B. and Ochs, E.. 1986a. “Language socialization.” Annual Review of Anthropology 15: 163–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B. and Ochs, E. (eds.). 1986b. Language socialization across cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi, Kathryn, Woolard, and Paul, Kroskrity (eds.). 1998. Language ideologies: practice and theory.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm. 1818. Observations sur la langue et la littérature provençales. Paris: Librairie grecque-latine-allemande.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. 1808. Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier. Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer.Google Scholar
Schleicher, August. 1967 [1871]. “Introduction to ‘A compendium of the comparative grammar of the Indo-European, Sanskrit, Greek and Latin languages’.” (From his Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen; Weismar: Hermann Böhlau, 1871, 1–9.) A reader in nineteenth-century historical Indo-European linguistics, 87–96. ed. and trans. by Winfred P. Lehmann. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. 1985. Young people's Djirbal: an example of language death from Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1885. “Über die Lautgesetze. Gegen die Junggrammatiker.” In Wilbur, T. H. (ed.), The Lautgesetz-controversy: a documentation, 51–87. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo 1902. “Etymologische Probleme und Prinzipien.”Zeischrift für romanische Philologie 26: 385–427.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo 1903. Zur Wortgeschichte. “Trouver.”Zeischrift für romanische Philologie 27: 97–105.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo 1928. Hugo Schuchardt-Brevier; ein Vademacum der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. 2te. erweiterte Aufl. Leo, Spitzer (ed.). Halle: Neimeyer.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo 1979. The ethnography of variation: selected writings on pidgins and creoles. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo 1980. Pidgin and creole languages. Ed. and trans. Glenn, Gilbert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schulte, Rainer and John, Biguenet. 1992. Theories of translation. An anthology of essays from Dryden to Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Emily A. 1990. Dialogue at the Margins: Whorf, Bakhtin, and linguistic relativity. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, S. 1982. “Reality set, socialization and linguistic convergence.” Unpublished Ph. D. thesis. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
Scribner, Sylvia. 1977. “Modes of thinking and ways of speaking: Culture and logic reconsidered.” In Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Wason, P. C. (eds.), Thinking: readings in cognitive science, 483–500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scribner, Sylvia 1992. “Mind in action: a functional approach to thinking, and the cognitive consequences of literacy.” Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 14(4): 83–157.Google Scholar
Scribner, Sylvia and Michael, Cole. 1981. The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, David. 1998. “The etymologies in Plato's Cratylus.”Journal of Hellenic Studies 118: 140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiler, Walter M. 1985. The Imonda language, West Sepik Province, PNG. Pacific Linguistics b-93. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sell, M. A. 1992. “The development of children's knowledge structures: events, slots, and taxonomies.”Journal of Child Language 19(3): 659–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senft, Gunther. 1987. “Kilivila color terms.” Studies in Language 11: 313–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senft, Gunther 1996. Classificatory particles in Kilivila. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sergent, Bernard. 1982. “Penser – et mal penser – les Indo-européens.”Annales: économies, sociétés, civilisations 37: 669–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sergent, Bernard 1995. Les Indo-Européens: histoire, langues, mythes.Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Seuren, Peter. 1984. “The bioprogram hypothesis: facts and fancy.” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 7(2): 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Michael. 1998. “Sound and meaning in Shakespeare's sonnets.”Language 74: 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shatz, M. 1983. Communication. Handbook of child psychology Volume III: Cognitive development. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 841–890.Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel. 1982. “Poetic structuring of Kuna discourse: the line.”Language in Society 11: 371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherzer, Joel 1983. Kuna ways of speaking. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel and Anthony, Woodbury (ed). 1987. Native American discourse: poetics and rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shore, Bradd. 1996. Culture in mind: cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, Richard A. 1990. “Cultural psychology – what is it?” In Stigler, J. W., Shweder, R. A., and Herdt, G. (eds.), Cultural psychology: essays on comparative human development, 1–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shweder, Richard A. and Robert, A. LeVine (eds.). 1984. Culture theory: essays on mind, self, and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siddell, Jack. 1998. “Organizing social and spatial location. Elicitations in Indo-Guyanese village talk.”Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7(2): 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddell, Jack 1999. “Gender and pronominal variation in an Indo-Guyanese community.”Language in Society 28(3), 367–399.Google Scholar
Siddell, Jack 2001. “Conversational turn taking in a Caribbean English creole.”Journal of Pragmatics 33(8), 1263–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 1985. “Koines and koineization.”Language in Society 14(3): 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Jeff 1987. Language contact in a plantation environment: a sociolinguistic history of Fiji. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff 1997. “Mixing, levelling and Pidgin/Creole development.” In Arthur, K. Spears and Donald, Winford (eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles, 111–149. Creole language library, 19. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1972. “Chinook jargon: language contact and the problem of multilevel generative systems.”Language 48: 378–406, 596–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1976. “Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description.” In Keith, H. Bass and Henry, A. Selby (eds.), Meaning in anthropology, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1977. “Cultural prerequisites to grammatical analysis.” In Muriel, Saville-Troike (ed.), Anthropology and linguistics, 139–151. Washington: Georgetown University Press. [Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics, 1977.]Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1979. “Language structure and linguistic ideology.” In Paul, Clyne, William, Hanks and Carol, Horbauer (eds.), The elements: a parasession on linguistic units and levels, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1981 (2001). “The limits of awareness.” In Alessandro, Duranti (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: a reader, 382–401. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1985. “Language and the culture of gender: at the intersection of structure, usage and ideology.” In Elizabeth, Mertz and Richard, Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic mediation: sociocultural and psychological perspectives, 219–259. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1993. “Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function.” In Lucy, J., Reflexive language: reported speech and metapragmatics, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1996. “The indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life.”SALSA (Symposium about language and society – Austin) 3: 266–295. Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1998. “The uses and utility of ideology: a commentary.” In Bambi, B. Schieffelin, Kathryn, A. Woolard, and Paul, Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: practice and theory, 123–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael and Greg Urban. 1996. “The natural history of discourse.” In Michael, Silverstein and Greg, Urban (eds.), Natural Histories of Discourse, 1–17. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Singler, John V. 1988. “The homogeneity of the substrate as a factor in Pidgin/Creole genesis.”Language, 64: 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singler, John V. 1993a. “African influence upon Afro-American language varieties: a consideration of sociohistorical factors.” In Salikoko, S. Mufwene (ed.), Africanism in Afro-American language varieties, 235–253. Athens/London: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Singler, John V. 1993b. “The cultural matrix of creolization: evidence from Goupy des Marets.” In The African presence in Caribbean French colonies in the seventeenth century: documentary evidence, 187–224. Travaux de recherche sur le créole haïtien. Montreal: UQAM, Groupe de recherche sur le créole haïtien.Google Scholar
Singler, John V. 1993c. “The African presence in Caribbean French colonies in the seventeenth century: documentary evidence.”Travaux de recherche sur le créole haïtien, 16–17: 1–236.Google Scholar
Singler, John V. 1993d. “The setting for creole genesis in France's Caribbean colonies: evidence from seventeen century Marie-Galante.” In The African presence in Caribbean French colonies in the seventeenth century: documentary evidence. Travaux de recherche sur le créole haïtien. Montreal: UQAM, Groupe de recherche sur le créole haïtien, 225–36.Google Scholar
Singler, John V. 1995. “The demographics of Creole genesis in the Caribbean: a comparison of Martinique and Haiti.” In Arends, J. (ed.), The early stages of creolization, 203–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove. 2000. Linguistic genocide in education or worldwide diversity and human rights?London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1985. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vols. 1–2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1992. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1996. “From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’.” In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1997. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vols. 4 and 5. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 2003. “Language and thought online: cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity.” In Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.), Language in mind: advances in the investigation of language and thought, 157–191. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Geoff. 2002. Growing up with Tok Pisin: contact, creolization and change in Papua New Guinea's national language. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Smith, Richard T. 1959. “Family structure and plantation systems in the new world.” In Plantation systems of the new world: papers and discussion summaries of the seminar held in San Juan, Puerto Rico, 148–159. Social Science monograph, no. 7. Washington: Pan American Union.Google Scholar
Smith-Hefner, B. 1988. “The linguistic socialization of Javanese children.”Anthropological Linguistics 30(2): 166–198.Google Scholar
Snow, D. L. 1971. “Samoan color terminology: a note on the universality and evolutionary ordering of color terms.” Anthropological Linguistics 13: 385–390.Google Scholar
Snyder, Gary. 1974. Turtle island. San Francisco: New Directions.Google Scholar
Snyder, Gary 1979. He who hunted birds in his father's village. The dimensions of a Haida myth. Bolinas, CA: Grey Fox Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Gary 1995. The Gary Snyder reader. Washington, DC: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
Spencer, Baldwin and Frank, Gillen. 1899. The native tribes of Central Australia. New York: MacMillan and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Spencer, Baldwin and Frank, Gillen 1912. Across Australia. London: MacMillan and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1985. “Anthropology and psychology: towards an epidemiology of representations.”Man 20: 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan 1987. On anthropological knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan 1996. Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperry, L. and D. Sperry. 2000. “Verbal and nonverbal contributions to early representation.” In Budwig, N., Uzgiris, U. and Wertsch, J. (eds.), Communication: an arena of development, 143–165. Stamford: Ablex.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Leo. 1940. “Trouver.”Romania 66: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spradley, J. ed. 1972. Culture and cognition: rules, maps, and plans. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Starr, Frederick. 1901. Some first steps in human progress. Cleveland: Chatauqua.Google Scholar
Stegmann von Pritzwald, Kurt. 1936. “Kräfte und Köpfe in der Geschichte der indogermanischen Sprachwissenschaft.” In Helmut, Arntz (ed.), Germanen und Indogermanen: Volkstum, Sprache, Heimat, Kultur. Festschrift für Herman Hirt, 1–24. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. [Indogermanische Bibliothek, 50, Teil 2.]Google Scholar
Steiner, George. 1975. After Babel: aspects of language and translation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann. 1848. Die Sprachwissenschaft Wilhelm von Humboldt's und die Hegel'sche Philosophie. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann 1860. Charakteristik der hauptsächlichsten Typen des Sprachbaues. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar
Stern, D. 1977. The first relationship: infant and mother. London: Fontana Open Books.Google Scholar
Stewart, William A. 1967. “Sociolinguistic factors in the history of American negro dialects.” Florida FL Reporter 5.Google Scholar
Stigler, James W., Richard, A. Shweder, and Gilbert, Herdt (eds.). 1990. Cultural psychology: essays on comparative human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocking, George W., Jr. 1965 (1968). “From physics to ethnology.” In George, W. Stocking Jr., Race, culture, and evolution, 133–160. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W., Jr. 1974. “Introduction: the basic concepts of Boasian anthropology.” In George, W. Stocking Jr. (ed.), The shaping of American anthropology, 1883–1911: A Franz Boas reader, 1–20. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. Jr. 1995. After Tylor, British social anthropology 1888–1951. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Stoller, Paul. 1985. “Toward a phenomenological perspective in Pidgin and Creole studies.” In Hancock, I. (ed.), Diversity and development in English related creoles, 1–12. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Strauss, Claudia and Naomi, Quinn. 1997. A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strömquist, Sven and Ludo, Verhoeven (eds.). 2004. Relating events in narrative, Vol. 2: typological and contextual perspectives. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy. 1987. Plans and situated actions: the problem of human machine interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swan, Brian. 1994. Coming to light. Contemporary translations of the native literature of North America. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre. 1985. “Catégories grammaticales et catégories culturelles dans la philosophie du langage de Humboldt: les implications de la ‘forme grammaticale’.”Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 38: 729–736.Google Scholar
Sylvain, Suzanne. 1936. Le créole haïtien: morphologie et syntaxe. Wetteren, Belgium: Imprimerie De Meester/Port-au-Prince: By the author.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald J. L. 1996. Introduction to Indo-European linguistics. [tr. of Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft, enlarged, 5th ed.]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1983. “How language structures space.” In Pick, H. and Acredolo, L. (eds.), Spatial orientation: theory, research and application, 225–282. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Michael L. 1995. “From Bakla to gay, shifting gender identities and sexual behaviors in the Philippines.” In Richard, G. Parker and John, H. Gagnon (eds.), Conceiving sexuality, approaches to sex research in a postmodern world, 85–96. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1984. Conversational style: analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah 1989. Talking voices: repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tappolet, Ernst. 1977 [1905]. “Phonetik und Semantik in der etymologischen Forschung.”Rüdiger, Schmitt (ed.), Etymologie, 74–102. Darmstadt: Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1979 [1971]. “Interpretation and the sciences of man.” In Paul, Rabinow and William, M. Sullivan (eds.), Interpretive social science: a reader, 25–72. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1991. “Ricoeur on narrative.” In David, Wood (ed.), On Paul Ricoeur: narrative and interpretation, 174–179. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1997. “L'interprétation et les sciences de l'homme.” In La liberté des modernes, 137–194. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Tedlock, Dennis. 1972. Finding the center: narrative poetry of the Zuni Indians. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Tedlock, Dennis 1983. The spoken word and the work of interpretation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedlock, Dennis 1985. Popol Vu. The definitive edition of the dawn of life and the glories of gods and kings. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Tedlock, Dennis and Jerome, Rothenberg. 1975. Alcheringa. Ethnopoetics. Boston: Boston University Press.Google Scholar
Thibault, Pierrette and Michelle, Daveluy. 1989. “Quelques traces du passage du temps dans le parler des Montréalais. 1971–1984.”Language Variation and Change 1: 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Antoine. 1900. Compte rendu de H. Schuchardt Romanische Etymologien, II. Romania 29: 438–440.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah and Terence, Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edgar T. 1975. Plantation societes, race relations, and the South: the regimentation of population. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Thurston, William R. 1987. Processes of change in the languages of north-western New Britain. Pacific linguistics. Series b no. 99. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Thurston, William R. 1989. “How exoteric languages build a lexicon: esoterogeny in West New Britain.” In Ray, Harlow and Robin, Hooper (eds.), VICAL 1, Oceanic languages: papers from the fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 555–579. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Tilley, Christopher. 1999. Metaphor and material culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tornay, Serge (ed.). 1978. Voir et nommer les couleurs. Nanterre: Publications du Laboratoire d'Ethnologie et de Sociologie Comparative, Université de Paris X.Google Scholar
Trabant, Jürgen. 1986. Apeliotes oder Der Sinn der Sprache. Wilhelm von Humboldts Sprach-Bild. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Trabant, Jürgen 1989. “Le courant humboldtien.” In Sylvain, Auroux (ed.), Histoire des idées linguistiques, 311–322 iii. Brussels: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Trabant, Jürgen 1990. Traditionen Humboldts. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Trabant, Jürgen 2000. “How relativistic are Humboldt's ‘Weltansichten’?” In Martin, Pütz and Marjolijn, H. Verspoor (eds.), Explorations in linguistic relativity, 25–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Trask, Robert Lawrence. 1996. Historical linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trawick, Margaret. 1992. Notes on love in a Tamil family. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. 1979. “Communication and co-operation in early infancy: a description of primary intersubjectivity.” In Bullowa, M. (ed.), Before speech, 321–349. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Troy, Jakelin. 1985. “Australian Aboriginal contact with the English language in New South Wales: 1788 to 1845.” B. A. Honours thesis in Anthropology. Sydney: University of Sydney.
Trumbach, Randolph. 1994. “London's sapphists: from three sexes to four genders in the making of modern culture.” In Herdt, , Third Sex, Third Gender, 111–136. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Tryon, Darrel T. and Jean-Michel, Charpentier. 2004. Pacific pidgins and creoles. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuite, Kevin. 1999. “Au delà du Stammbaum: théories modernes du changement linguistique.”Anthropologie et sociétés 23(3): 15–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuite, Kevin n.d. “The meaning of Dæl. Symbolic and spatial associations of the South Caucasian Goddess of game animals.” m.s.
Turgot, Anne-Robert-Jacques. 1966 [1756]. “Étymologie.” In Denis, Diderot and Jean, D'Alembert (eds.), Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers vol. vi: 98–111. Stuttgart: F. Frommann Verlag.Google Scholar
Turner, David. 1978. “La catégorization de la couleur en Music.” In Tournay, ed. 1978.
Turner, David 1980. “There's no such beast: cattle and colour naming among the Music.” Man 15: 320–338.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1966. “Color classification in Ndembu ritual.” In Michael, Banton (ed.), Anthropological approaches to the study of religion. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor 1967. The forest of symbols. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Stephen A. (ed.). 1969. Cognitive anthropology: readings. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Tylor, Edward Burnett. 1871. Primitive culture. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Urton, Gary with Primitivo, Nina Llanos. 1997. The social life of numbers: a Quechua ontology of numbers and philosophy of arithmetic. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, François. 1996. “Le français dans un contexte économique.” In Jürgen, Erfurt (ed.), De la polyphonie à la symphonie. Méthodes, théories et faits de la recherche pluridisciplinaire sur le français au Canada, 119–136. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Valdman, Albert (ed.). 1977. Pidgin and creole linguistics. Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Varro, Gabrielle. 1984. La femme transplantée. Une étude du mariage franco-américain en France et le bilinguisme des enfants. Lille: Le Septentrion.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo (ed.). 1989. The new sound of Indo-European: essays in phonological reconstruction. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voegelin, Carl F. and Florence M. Voegelin. 1957. Hopi domains. Indiana University Publication in Anthroplogy and Linguistics. Memoir no. 14 of the International Journal of American Linguistics.
Volterra, V. and Taeschner, T.. 1978. “The acquisition and development of language in bilingual children.”Journal of Child Language 5: 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1987 (1934). Thought and language (rev. edn. A. Kozulin). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wagoner, David. 1998. The principles of concealment. Poetry Magazine, May.
Walcott, Derek. 1990. Omeros. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Ward, M. 1971. Them children: a study in language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Wassman, Jürg and Pierre, R. Dasen. 1998. “Balinese spatial orientation: some empirical evidence for moderate linguistic relativity.”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Incorporating Man (ns), 4: 689–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson-Gegeo, K. and D. Gegeo. 1986. “Calling out and repeating routines in the language socialization of Basotho children.” In Schieffelin, B. B. and Ochs, E. (eds.), Language socialization across cultures, 17–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wax, Murray. 1956. “The limitations of Boas' anthropology.”American Anthropologist 58: 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Eugene. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinberger, Eliot and Octavio, Paz. 1987. Nineteen ways of looking at Wang Wei. Wakefield, RI: Moyer Bell.Google Scholar
Weiner, Jonathan. 1995. The beak of the finch. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953a. Languages in contact. New York: Linguistics Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Weisgerber, Leo. 1926 (1965). “Das Problem der inneren Sprachform und seine Bedeutung für die deutsche Sprache.” In Leo, Weisgerber, Zur Grundlegung der ganzheitlichen Sprachaffassung. Aufsätze 1925–1933, 36–50. Helmut Gipper (ed.). Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Weisgerber, Leo 1954. Vom Weltbild der deutschen Sprache, 2 Halbband. Die sprachliche Erschliessung der Welt. Düsseldorf: Schwann. [Von den Kräften der deutschen Sprache, 2nd edn., 2.]Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. 1985. Culture, communication and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, Geoffrey. 1980. “Conceptual universals in interpersonal language.”American Anthropologist. 82: 759–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Hayden. 1980. “The value of narrativity in the representation of reality.”Critical Inquiry 7: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Hayden 1984. “The question of narrative in contemporary historical theory.”History and Theory 23(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1940. “Science and linguistics,”Technology Review 42(6): 229–31, 247–8.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee 1941a (1956). “The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language.” In John, B. Carroll (ed.). Language, thought and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Orig. pub. in Language culture and personality, essays in memory of Edward Sapir. Leslie Spier, ed. Menasha, WI: Sapir Memorial Publications Fund.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee 1941b (1956). “Languages and logic.” In Language, thought, and reality, 233–245.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee 1956 (1936). “An American Indian model of the universe.” In John, B. Carroll (ed.), Language, thought, and reality: selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, 57–64. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1990. “The meaning of color terms: semantics, culture, and cognition.” Cognitive Linguistics 1: 99–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna 1992. Semantics, culture, and cognition: universals of human concepts in culture-specific configurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilbert, Johannes. 1993. Mystic endowment: religious ethnography of the Warao Indians. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Terence H. 1977. “Introduction.” The Lautgesetz-controversy: a documentation. Amsterdam: J.
Williams, Bernard. 2002. Truth and truthfulness: an essay in genealogy. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Glyn. 1992. Sociolinguistics: a sociological critique. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williamson, S. G. 1979. “Tamil baby talk: a cross-cultural study.” Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
Winford, Donald. 2000. “‘Intermediate’ creole and degrees of change in creole formation: the case of Bajan.” In Ingrid, Neumann-Holzschuh and Edgar, W. Schneider (eds.), Degrees of restructuring in Creole languages, 215–246. Creole Language Library, 22. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Winteler, Jost. 1876. Die Kerenzer Mundart des Kantons Glarus, in ihren Grundzügen dargestellt. Leipzig: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Witthoft, N., Winawer, J., Wu, L., Frank, M., Wade, A., and Boroditsky, L.. 2003. “Effects of language on color discriminability.”Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Woehrling, José. 1996. “Le droit et la législation comme moyens d'intervention sur le français: les politiques linguistiques du Québec, des autorités fédérales et des provinces anglophones.” In Jürgen, Erfurt (ed.), De la polyphonie à la symphonie. Méthodes, théories et faits de la recherche pluridisciplinaire sur le français au Canada, 209–232. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony C. 1985. “Functions of rhetorical structure: a study of central Alaskan Yupik Eskimo discourse.”Language in Society 14: 150–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn and Bambi, Schieffelin. 1994. “Language ideology.”Annual Review of Anthropology 23: 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Ellen and William, Washabaugh. 1983. The social context of creolization. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 1985. “Between philosophy and archaeology.”American Antiquity 50 (2): 478–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zentella, A. C. 1990. “Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in the study of bilingual code-switching.” In Bendix, E. (ed.), The uses of linguistics: annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 583, 75–92. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Zentella, Ana Celia. 1981. “Tá bien, you could answer me in cualquier idioma: Puerto Rican code-switching in bilingual classrooms.” In Richard, Duran (ed.), Latino language and communicative behavior, 109–131. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Zentella, Ana Celia 1997. Growing up bilingual: Puerto Rican children in New York. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Christine Jourdan, Concordia University, Montréal, Kevin Tuite, Université de Montréal
  • Book: Language, Culture, and Society
  • Online publication: 16 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616792.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Christine Jourdan, Concordia University, Montréal, Kevin Tuite, Université de Montréal
  • Book: Language, Culture, and Society
  • Online publication: 16 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616792.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Christine Jourdan, Concordia University, Montréal, Kevin Tuite, Université de Montréal
  • Book: Language, Culture, and Society
  • Online publication: 16 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616792.013
Available formats
×