Book contents
- Kant on Freedom, Nature, and Judgment
- Kant on Freedom, Nature, and Judgment
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Reason, Hope, and Territory
- 2 Reflection, Purposiveness, Metaphysics
- 3 “Life” and the Ideal of Beauty
- 4 The Sensus Communis and the Ground of the Critical System
- 5 Genius, Aesthetic Ideas, and a Spiritualized Natural Order
- 6 The Domain of Nature as System: Ends
- 7 Hope and Faith: God in the Critique of Teleological Judgment
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 August 2023
Book contents
- Kant on Freedom, Nature, and Judgment
- Kant on Freedom, Nature, and Judgment
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Reason, Hope, and Territory
- 2 Reflection, Purposiveness, Metaphysics
- 3 “Life” and the Ideal of Beauty
- 4 The Sensus Communis and the Ground of the Critical System
- 5 Genius, Aesthetic Ideas, and a Spiritualized Natural Order
- 6 The Domain of Nature as System: Ends
- 7 Hope and Faith: God in the Critique of Teleological Judgment
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant on Freedom, Nature, and JudgmentThe Territory of the Third <i>Critique</i>, pp. 207 - 213Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Allen, Barry, “The Abyss of Contingency: Purposiveness and Contingency in Kant and Darwin,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 20:4 (2003): 373–391.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry, Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, “How to Save Kant’s Deduction of Taste,” Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (1982): 295–302.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, “Kant on Science and Common Knowledge,” in Eric Watkins, ed., Kant and the Sciences (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 31–52.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , On the Soul, in Hett, W. S. (trans.) Aristotle: On the Soul, Parva Naturalia, On Breath (Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library, 1957), 2–203.Google Scholar
Arthos, John, “The Paradigmatic Interpenetration of Hermeneutics and Rhetoric,” in Theodore George and Gert-Jan van der Heiden, eds., The Gadamerian Mind (London: Routledge, 2021), 400–417.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C., The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism, 1796–1880 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans, “Self-Preservation and Intertia: On the Constitution of Modern Rationality,” Contemporary German Philosophy 3 (1983): 209–256.Google Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel, “‘The Summit of Kantian Speculation’: Fichte’s Reception of the Third Critique,” Anuario Filosófico 52:1 (2019): 113–144.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela, “Two Views on Nature: A Solution to the Kant’s Antinomy of Mechanism and Teleology,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16:2 (2008): 351–369.Google Scholar
Bruno, Paul, Kant’s Concept of Genius: Its Origin and Function in the Third Critique (New York: Continuum, 2010).Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling, A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Cassirer, H. W., A Commentary of Kant’s Critique of Judgment (New York: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew, “Rational Hope, Moral Order, and the Revolution of the Will,” in Eric Watkins, ed., Divine Order, Human Order, and the Order of Nature (London: Oxford University Press, 2013), 197–218.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew, “Rational Hope, Possibility, and Divine Action,” in Eric Watkins, ed., Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 98–117.Google Scholar
Clark, Christopher, Iron Kingdom: The Rise and Downfall of Prussia, 1600–1947 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert, The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom (London: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Crawford, Donald, Kant’s Aesthetic Theory (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Cureton, Adam, “Reasonable Hope in Kant’s Ethics,” Kantian Review 23:2 (2018): 181–203.Google Scholar
Debord, Charles, “Geist and Communication in Kant’s Theory of Aesthetic Ideas,” Kantian Review 17:2 (2012): 177–190.Google Scholar
Descartes, René, “Meditations on First Philosophy,” in John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch (trans.) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 2 (London: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 1–62.Google Scholar
Descartes, René, “Passions of the Soul,” in John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch (trans.) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 325–404.Google Scholar
Descartes, René, “Rules for the Direction of the Mind,” in Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald (trans.) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1 (London: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 7–78.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jeffrey, Substance, Force, and the Possibility of Knowledge: On Kant’s Philosophy of Material Nature (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Edwards, Jeffrey, “One More Time: Kant’s Metaphysics of Nature and the Idea of Transition,” in Ferrini, Cinzia, ed., Eredita kantiane (Rome: Bibliopolis, 2004), 155–188.Google Scholar
Figal, Günter, Aesthetics as Phenomenology: The Appearance of Things (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Ford, Richard T., “Law’s Territory (A History of Jurisdiction),” Michigan Law Review 97 (1999): 843–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, Eckart, Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus postumum (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Friedlander, Eli, Expressions of Judgment: As Essay on Kant’s Aesthetics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Funderbunk, L., “Book Review of Kant’s Concept of Teleology,” Kant-Studien 62:1 (1971): 137–138.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, “Intuition and Vividness,” in Robert Bernasconi, ed., The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 155–170.Google Scholar
Gammon, Martin, “‘Exemplary Originality’: Kant on Genius and Imitation,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 35:4 (1997): 563–592.Google Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe, The Idea of Form: Rethinking Kant’s Aesthetics (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah, The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle, Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul, “Feeling and Freedom,” in Kant and the Experience of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 278–313.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul, “From Nature to Morality: Kant’s New Argument in the ‘Critique of Teleological Judgment,’” in Kant’s System of Natura and Freedom: Selected Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul, ed., Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003), 314–342.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul, “The Unity of Nature and Freedom: Kant’s Conception of the System of Philosophy,” in Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 278–313.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D. W., Aristotle’s De Anima Books II and III (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart, “The Social Spirit of Mankind,” in Eckart Förster, ed., Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three Critiques and the Opus postumum (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989), 145–156.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Faith and Knowledge (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Heine, Heinrich, Religion and Philosophy in Germany (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, “Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the first Critique,” in Förster, Eckhart, ed., Kant’s Transcendental Deductions (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989), 27–46.Google Scholar
Hicks, R.D, “Introduction” in Aristotle De Anima (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, xix–lxxxiii).Google Scholar
Howard, Stephen, “The Transition within the Transition: The Übergang from the Selbstsetzungslehre to the Ether Proofs in Kant’s Opus postumum,” Kant-Studien 110:4 (2019): 595–617.Google Scholar
Huneman, Phillippe, “Purposiveness, Necessity, and Contingency,” in Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric, eds., Kant’s Theory of Biology (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014), 185–202.Google Scholar
Insole, Christopher, “The Irreducible Importance of Religious Hope in Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good,” Philosophy 83 (2008): 333–351.Google Scholar
Kalar, Brent, “The Ethical Significance of Kant’s Sensus Communis: From Aesthetic to Ethical Community,” Idealistic Studies 47:1&2 (2018): 43–58.Google Scholar
Kemal, Salim, Kant and Fine Art: An Essay on Kant and the Philosophy of Fine Art and Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Kern, Andrea, “Aesthetic Self-Consciousness and Sensus Communis: On the Significance of Ordinary Language in Kant’s Analytic of the Beautiful,” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 39:2 (2019): 451–471.Google Scholar
Kneller, Jane, Kant and the Power of Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), cf. Chapters 2–4.Google Scholar
Kreines, James, “The Inexplicability of Kant’s Naturzweck: Kant on Teleology, Explanation, and Biology,” Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (2005): 270–311.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred, “Kant’s Teachers in the Exact Sciences,” in Eric Watkins, ed., Kant and the Sciences (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 11–30.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred, Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768–1800: A Contribution to the History of Critical Philosophy (Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried, De Jure Suprematu Principum Germaniae (Caeserinus Fürstenerius), in The Political Writings of Leibniz (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried, Monadology, in Woolhouse, R. S. and Francks, Richard, eds., Philosophical Texts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 267–281.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François, Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
The Online Lidell-Scott-Jones Greek-English Lexicon, via Thesaurus Linguae Graecae.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A., Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A., Orientation and Judgment in Hermeneutics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Luft, Sebastian Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Malpas, Jeff and Thiel, Karsten, “Kant’s Geography and Reason,” in Elden, Stuart and Mendieta, Eduardo, eds., Reading Kant’s Geography (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Martin, Gottfried, Kant’s Metaphysics and Theory of Science (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1955).Google Scholar
McFarland, J. D., Kant’s Concept of Teleology (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
McFarland, J. D., “The Bogus Unity of the Kantian Philosophy,” in Duchesneau, François, Laberge, Pierre & Morrisey, Bryan E., eds., Actes du congres d’ottawa sur Kant dans les traditions Anglo-Americans et Continentales tenu du 10 au 14 octobre 1974/Proceedings of the Ottawa Congress on Kant in the Anglo-american and Continental Traditions Held 10–14 October, 1974 (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1976), 180–196.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter, Kant’s Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Meerbote, Ralf, “Reflection on Beauty,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), 55–86.Google Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer, Kant’s Organicism: Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchnik, Pablo, Kant’s Theory of Evil: An Essay on the Dangers of Self-Love and Aprioricity of History (New York: Lexington Books, 2008).Google Scholar
Naas, Michael, Plato and the Invention of Life (New York: Fordham University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Nassar, Dalia, “Analogical Reflection as a Source for the Science of Life: Kant and the Possibility of the Biological Sciences,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 58 (2016): 57–66.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, Angelica, Kant and the Unity of Reason (West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora, Kant on Reason and Religion, in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1997), 269–308.Google Scholar
Ostaric, Lara, “Kant on the Normativity of Creative Production,” Kantian Review 17:1, (2012): 75–107.Google Scholar
Papineau, David, “The Vis Viva Controversy: Do Meanings Matter?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 8:2 (1977): 111–142.Google Scholar
Parmenides, On Nature, Early Greek Philosophy, Volume V: Western Greek Thinkers, Part 2. Edited and translated by André Laks, Glenn W. Most. Loeb Classical Library 528. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Peters, F.E., Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon (New York: New York University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Plato, Theaetetus, in Cooper, John M., ed., Plato: Complete Works (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1997).Google Scholar
Proulx, Jeremy, “Art and the Fecundity of Nature,” in Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca and Margit Ruffing, eds., Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongress (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013): 191–201.Google Scholar
Rauscher, Fred, Book review of Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, May 7, 2009.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas, An Inquiry into the Human Mind and the Principles of Common Sense (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1764).Google Scholar
Rohlf, Michael, “The Transition from Nature to Freedom in Kant’s Third Critique,” Kant-Studien 99 (2008): 339–360.Google Scholar
Ross, David, “Introduction,” in David Ross, ed., Aristotle De Anima (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961 ), 1–59.Google Scholar
Rossi, Philip, “Kant as a Christian Philosopher: Hope and the Symbols of the Christian Faith,” Philosophy Today 25:1 (1981): 24–33.Google Scholar
Sassen, Brigitte, “Artistic Genius and the Question of Creativity,” in Guyer, Paul, ed., Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003).Google Scholar
Schaefer, John D., Sensus Communis: Vico, Rhetoric, and the Limits of Relativism (Durham: Duke University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Schaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, Sensus Communis: An Essay on the Freedom of Wit and Humour, (London: Egbert Sanger, 1709).Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J., The Philosophy of Art (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Schutt, Marie Zermatt, “Kant’s Moral Theology,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 18:4 (2010): 611–633.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver, “Dignity and the Formula of Humanity,” in Timmermann, Jens, ed., Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009): 102–118.Google Scholar
Smith, John E., “Foreword,” to Kroner, Richard, Kant’s Weltanschauung: The Ethical and Religious Derivation of Kant’s Worldview (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Stevenson, Leslie, “Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge,” Kantian Review, 7 (2003): 72–101.Google Scholar
Stoner, Samuel, “On the Primacy of the Spectator in Kant’s Account of Genius,” The Review of Metaphysics 70 (2016): 87–117.Google Scholar
Sweet, Kristi, “Reflection: Its Structure and Meaning inn Kant’s Judgements of Taste,” Kantian Review 14:1 (2009): 53–80.Google Scholar
Sweet, Kristi, “Kant and the Culture of Discipline: Rethinking the Nature of Nature,” Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15:1 (2010): 121–138.Google Scholar
Sweet, Kristi, Kant on Practical Life: From Duty to History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Sweet, Kristi, “What Is Philosophical about Kant’s Anthropology,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25:3 (2017): 109–118.Google Scholar
Tarbet, David. W., “The Fabric of Metaphor in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 6:3 (1968): 257–270.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Oliver, Kant’s Transition Project and Late Philosophy: Connecting the Opus Postumum and the Metaphysics of Morals (London: Bloomsbury, 2018).Google Scholar
Toyoda, Tetsuya, Theory and Politics of the Law of Nations: Political Bias in International Law Discourse of German Court Councilors in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Leiden: Brill Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar
Trullinger, Joseph, “Kant’s Two Touchstones for Conviction: The Incommunicable Dimension of Moral Faith,” The Review of Metaphysics 67 (2013): 369–403.Google Scholar
Tuschling, Burkhard, “The System of Transcendental Idealism: Questions Raised and Left Open in the Kritik der Urteilskraft,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (1991): 196–210.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “Nature in General as a System of Ends,” in Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric, eds., Kant’s Theory of Biology (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2014), 117–130.Google Scholar
Westphal, K.R.,“Epistemic Reflection and Cognitive Reference in Kant’s Transcendental Response to Skepticism,” Kant-Studien 94 (2003): 135–171.Google Scholar
Woolwine, Sarah, “Systematicity in the Critique of Judgment: The Emergence of a Unified Subject,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 25:4 (2011): 343–358.Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmihau, Kant the Philosophy of History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Ypi, Lea, “The Problem of Systematic Unity in Kant’s Two Definitions of Philosophy,” in Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca and Margit Ruffing, eds., Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013), 773–785.Google Scholar
Zammito, John, The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Zammito, John, Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Zammito, John, “Kant and the Medical Faculty: One ‘Conflict of the Faculties’,” Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 22:2 (2018): 429–451.Google Scholar
Zammito, John, “The ‘Sublime,’ the ‘Supersensible Substrate,’ and ‘Spirit’—Intuitions of the Ultimate in Kant’s third Critique,” in Palmquist, Stephen, ed., Kant on Intuition: Western and Asian Perspectives on Transcendental Idealism (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
Zinkin, Melissa, “Kant and the Pleasure of ‘Mere Reflection’,” Inquiry 55:5 (2012): 433–453.Google Scholar
Zinkin, Melissa, “Kant’s Supersensible Substratum of Humanity,” in Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht, Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Band 4 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013), 334–342.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel, “Boring Beauty and Universal Morality: Kant on the Ideal of Beauty,” Inquiry 48:2 (2005): 107–130.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel, Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel, “Hidden Antinomies of Practical Reason, and Kant’s Religion of Hope,” Kant Yearbook 10 (2018): 199–217.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel, “Is Kantian Hope a Feeling?” in Sorenson, Kelly and Williamson, Diane, eds., Kant and the Faculty of Feeling (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), 242–259.Google Scholar