References

Ido Geiger

doi:10.1017/9781108992565.009

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 April 2022

Ido Geiger

Show author details

Ido Geiger: Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World
A Transcendental Reading of the <I>Critique of the Power of Judgment</I>
, pp. 216 - 222

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108992565.009 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the “Critique of Aesthetic Judgment.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E. “Reflective Judgment and the Application of Logic to Nature: Kant’s Deduction of the Principle of Purposiveness as an Answer to Hume.” In Essays on Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 177–188.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E. “Kant’s Antinomy of Teleological Judgment.” In Essays on Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 201–214.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl. “How to Save Kant’s Deduction of Taste as Objective?” In Interpreting Kant’s “Critiques.” Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003, pp. 285–306.Google Scholar

Banham, Gary. Kant and the Ends of Aesthetics. Houndmills: Macmillan Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Baum, Manfred. “Kants Prinzip der Zweckmäßigkeit und Hegels Realisierung des Begriffs.” In Hegel und die “Kritik der Urteilskraft,” edited by Fulda, Hans-Friedrich and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1988, pp. 158–173.Google Scholar

Bellori, Giovanni Pietro. The Lives of the Modern Painters, Sculptors and Architects. Translated by Wohl, Alice Sedgwick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Biemel, Walter. Die Bedeutung von Kants Begründung der Ästhetik für die Philosophie der Kunst. Köln: Kölner Universitäts-Verlag, 1959.Google Scholar

Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. Über den Bildungstrieb. Göttingen: Johann Christian Dieterich, 1789.Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard. “Die Schönheit der Kristalle und das Spiel der Erkenntniskräfte.” In Autographen, Dokumente und Berichte: zu Edition, Amtsgeschäften und Werk Immanuel Kants, edited by Brandt, Reinhard and Stark, Werner. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1994, pp. 19–57.Google Scholar

Breitenbach, Angela. “Mechanical Explanation of Nature and Its Limits in Kant’s ‘Critique of Judgment’.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 37 (2006): 694–711.Google Scholar

Breitenbach, Angela. Die Analogie von Vernunft und Natur: Eine Umweltphilosophie nach Kant. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2009.Google Scholar

Breitenbach, Angela. “Teleology in Biology: A Kantian Perspective.” Kant Yearbook 1 (2009): 31–56.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brittan, Gordon G. Jr. Kant’s Theory of Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. Kant’s Life and Thought. Translated by Haden, James. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Chignell, Andrew. “Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2007): 430–431.Google Scholar

Cicero, Marcus Tullius. On Invention. The Best Kind of Orator. Topics. Translated by Hubbell, H. M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Cohen, Alix. “Kant on Epigenesis, Monogenesis and Human Nature: The Biological Premises of Anthropology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (2006): 675–693.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cohen, Alix A. Kant and the Human Sciences: Biology, Anthropology and History. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, Alix A. “Kant on Beauty and Cognition: The Aesthetic Dimension of Cognition.” In Thinking about Science and Reflecting on Art: Bringing Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Science Together, edited by Bueno, Otávio, Darby, George, French, Steven, and Rickles, Dean. London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 140–154.Google Scholar

Cooper, Andrew. “Kant and Experimental Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (2017): 265–286.Google Scholar

Cornell, John F. “Newton of the Grassblade? Darwin and the Problem of Organic Teleology.” Isis 77 (1986): 404–421.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine, and Gallison, Peter. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 2007.Google Scholar

Dijksterhuis, Eduard J. Die Mechanisierung des Weltbildes. Berlin: Springer, 1956.Google Scholar

Düsing, Klaus. “Beauty as the Transition from Nature to Freedom in Kant’s ‘Critique of Judgement’.” Noûs 24 (1990): 79–92.Google Scholar

Düsing, Klaus. “Naturteleologie und Metaphysik bei Kant und Hegel.” In Hegel und die “Kritik der Urteilskraft,” edited by Fulda, Hans-Friedrich and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1990, pp. 139–157.Google Scholar

Euler, Leonhard. Letters to a German Princess on Different Subjects of Physics and Philosophy. Translated by Hunt, Henry. London: H. Murray, 1795.Google Scholar

Falkenburg, Brigitte. Kants Kosmologie: Die Wissenschaftliche Revolution der Naturphilosophie im 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 2000.Google Scholar

Förster, Eckart. Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the “Opus Postumum.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Förster, Eckart. “Die Bedeutung von §§ 76, 77 der Kritik der Urteilskraft für die Entwicklung der nachkantischen Philosophie [Teil 1].” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 56 (2002): 169–190.Google Scholar

Förster, Eckart. “Die Bedeutung von §§ 76, 77 der Kritik der Urteilskraft für die Entwicklung der nachkantischen Philosophie [Teil 2].” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 56 (2002): 321–345.Google Scholar

Freudenthal, Gideon. “Kritik und Rehabilitierung des Mechanismus.” Konsequent 6 (1984): 121–134.Google Scholar

Freudenthal, Gideon. Atom and Individual in the Age of Newton: On the Genesis of the Mechanistic World View. Translated by McLaughlin, Peter. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1986.Google Scholar

Fricke, Christel. Kants Theorie des reinen Geschmacksurteils. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar

Fricke, Christel. “Kants Theorie der schönen Form.” In Akten des Siebenten Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, II.1., edited by Funke, Gerhard. Bonn: Bouvier, 1991, pp. 623–632.Google Scholar

Friedlander, Eli. “Meaning and Aesthetic Judgment in Kant.” Philosophical Topics 34 (2006): 21–34.CrossRef Google Scholar

Geiger, Ido. “Is the Assumption of a Systematic Whole of Empirical Concepts a Necessary Condition of Knowledge?” Kant-Studien 94 (2003): 273–298.Google Scholar

Geiger, Ido. “Is Teleological Judgment (Still) Necessary? Kant’s Arguments in the Analytic and in the Dialectic of Teleological Judgment.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2009): 533–566.Google Scholar

Geiger, Ido. “Transcendental Idealism in the Third Critique .” In Kant’s Idealism. New Interpretations of a Controversial Doctrine, edited by Schulting, Dennis and Verburgt, Jacco. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, pp. 71–88.Google Scholar

Geiger, Ido. “Purposiveness: Regulative or Realized? Hegel’s Response to Kant’s Antinomy of Teleological Judgment.” Hegel-Jahrbuch (2016): 498–504.Google Scholar

Geiger, Ido. “Kant on the Analytic-Synthetic or Mechanistic Model of Causal Explanation.” Kant Yearbook 9 (2017): 19–42.CrossRef Google Scholar

Geiger, Ido. “Aesthetic Normativity and the Acquisition of Empirical Concepts.” Con-Textos Kantianos 12 (2020): 71–104.Google Scholar

Geiger, Ido. “Kant on Aesthetic Ideas, Rational Ideas and the Subject-Matter of Art.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 79 (2021): 186–199.Google Scholar

Geiger, Ido. “Methodology of the Teleological Power of Judgment.” In The Kantian Mind, edited by Baiasu, Sorin and Timmons, Mark. London: Routledge. [Forthcoming]Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Empirical Concepts and the Content of Experience.” European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2006): 349–372.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s “Critique of Judgment.” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “On the Key to Kant’s Critique of Taste.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 32–52.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Lawfulness without a Law: Kant on the Free Play of Imagination and Understanding.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 53–93.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Reflective Judgment and Taste.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 135–147.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Thinking the Particular as Contained under the Universal.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 148–169.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Aesthetic Judgment and Perceptual Normativity.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 170–201.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Kant on Understanding Organisms as Natural Purposes.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 255–280.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Two Kinds of Mechanical Inexplicability in Kant and Aristotle.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 281–315.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Oughts without Intentions: A Kantian Approach to Biological Functions.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 332–345.Google Scholar

von Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. “Fortunate Encounter.” In Scientific Studies, edited and translated by Miller, Douglas. New York: Suhrkamp, 1998, pp. 18–21.Google Scholar

Gotshalk, Dilman Walter. “Form and Expression in Kant’s Aesthetics.” British Journal of Aesthetics 7 (1967): 250–260.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goy, Ina. Kants Theorie der Biologie: Ein Kommentar. Eine Lesart. Eine Historische Einordnung. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. “Organisms and the Unity of Science.” In Kant and the Exact Sciences, edited by Watkins, Eric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 259–281.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. “Kant on the Purity of the Ugly.” In Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 141–162.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. “From Nature to Morality: Kant’s New Argument in the ‘Critique of Teleological Judgment’.” In Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005, pp. 314–342.CrossRef Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. “The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited.” In Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, edited by Kukla, Rebecca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 162–193.Google Scholar

Hakfoort, Casper. Optics in the Age of Euler: Conceptions of the Nature of Light 1700–1795. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hanna, Robert. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Hanna, Robert. “Kant and Nonconceptual Content.” European Journal of Philosophy 13 (2005): 247–290.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Science of Logic, edited and translated by Di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. “Kant’s Explanation of Aesthetic Judgment.” In Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World: Studies in Kant. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992, pp. 29–56.Google Scholar

Hume, David. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Illetterati, Luca. “Teleological Judgments: Between Technique and Nature.” In Kant’s Theory of Biology, edited by Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2014, pp. 81–98.Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark L. “Kant’s Unified Theory of Beauty.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 38 (1979): 167–178.Google Scholar

Kitcher, Patricia. Kant’s Transcendental Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Kreines, James. “Kant on the Laws of Nature: Laws, Necessitation, and the Limitation of Our Knowledge.” European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2009): 527–558.Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred. “Kant’s Conception of ‘Hume’s Problem’.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (1983): 175–194.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. New Essays on Human Understanding, edited and translated by Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophical Essays, edited and translated by Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1989.Google Scholar

Lenoir, Timothy. “Blumenbach and Vital Materialism in German Biology.” ISIS 71 (1980): 77–108.Google Scholar

Lenoir, Timothy. The Strategy of Life: Teleology and Mechanics in Nineteenth Century German Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Kant’s Leading Thread in the Analytic of the Beautiful.” In Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, edited by Kukla, Rebecca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 194–219.Google Scholar

Lorand, Ruth. “Free and Dependent Beauty: A Puzzling Issue.” British Journal of Aesthetics 29 (1989): 32–40.Google Scholar

Lovejoy, Arthur O. “Kant and Evolution.” In Forerunners of Darwin 1745–1859, edited by Glass, Bentley, Temkin, Owsei, and Strauss, William L. Jr. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1968, pp. 173–206.Google Scholar

Lüthe, Rudolf. “Kants Lehre von den ästhetischen Ideen.” Kant-Studien 75 (1984): 65–74.Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. “Regulative and Reflective Uses of Purposiveness in Kant.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (Supplement) (1991): 49–63.Google Scholar

Matherne, Samantha. “Kant and the Art of schematism.” Kantian Review 19 (2014): 181–205.Google Scholar

Matherne, Samantha. “Images and Kant’s Theory of Perception.” Ergo 2 (2015): 737–777.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. “The Multiple Meanings of Teleological.” In Towards a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988, pp. 38–66.Google Scholar

McDowell, John. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, Peter. “Blumenbach und der Bildungstrieb: Zum Verhältnis von epigenetischer Embryologie und typologischem Artbegriff.” Medizinhistorisches Journal 17 (1982): 357–372.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, Peter. Kant’s Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation: Antinomy and Teleology. Lewiston: Edwin Mellon Press, 1990.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, Peter. “Newtonian Biology and Kant’s Mechanistic Concept of Causality.” In Akten des Siebenten Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, edited by Funke, Gerhard. Bonn: Bouvier, 1991.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, Peter. “Mechanical Explanation in the ‘Critique of the Teleological Power of Judgment’.” In Kant’s Theory of Biology, edited by Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2014, pp. 149–166.Google Scholar

Meerbote, Ralf. “Reflection on Beauty.” In Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics, edited by Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1982, pp. 21–54.Google Scholar

Messina, James. “Kant’s Necessitation Account of Laws and the Nature of Natures.” In Kant and the Laws of Nature, edited by Massimi, Michela and Breitenbach, Angela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 131–149.Google Scholar

Møller Pedersen, Kurt. “Leonhard Euler’s Wave Theory of Light.” Perspectives on Science 16 (2008): 392–416.Google Scholar

Nuzzo, Angelica. Kant and the Unity of Reason. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Panofsky, Erwin. Idea: A Concept in Art Theory. Translated by Peake, Joseph J. S.. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Pliny, . Natural History. Translated by Rackham, H.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Quarfood, Marcel. “The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment: What It Is and How It Is Solved.” In Kant’s Theory of Biology, edited by Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2014, pp. 167–183.Google Scholar

Reiter, Aviv. “Kant and Hegel on the End and Means of Fine Art: From an A-Historical to a Historical Conception of Art.” Hegel-Jahrbuch (2017): 35–40.Google Scholar

Reiter, Aviv. The End and Historicity of the Fine Arts: From the Idealist Theory of the Renaissance to the Formation of a Systematic-Historical Conception in Hegel’s Philosophy of Art. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel-Aviv University, 2020.Google Scholar

Reiter, Aviv. “Kant on the Aesthetic Ideas of Beautiful Nature.” British Journal of Aesthetics 61 (2021): 403–419.Google Scholar

Reiter, Aviv, and Geiger, Ido. “Kant on Form, Function and Decoration.” Proceedings of the European Society of Aesthetics 7 (2015): 234–245.Google Scholar

Reiter, Aviv, and Geiger, Ido. “Natural Beauty, Fine Art and the Relation between Them.” Kant-Studien 109 (2018): 72–100.CrossRef Google Scholar

Richards, Robert J. “Kant and Blumenbach on the Bildungstrieb: A Historical Misunderstanding.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (2000): 11–32.Google Scholar

Rind, Miles. “Can Kant’s Deduction of Judgments of Taste be Saved?” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84 (2002): 20–45.Google Scholar

Roe, Shirley A. Matter, Life, and Generation: Eighteenth-Century Embryology and the Haller-Wolff Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Roth, Siegfried. “Kant und die Biologie seiner Zeit (§§79–81).” In Immanuel Kant: Kritik der Urteilskraft, edited by Höffe, Otfried. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2008, pp. 275–287.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rush, Fred L. Jr. “The Harmony of the Faculties.” Kant-Studien 92 (2001): 38–61.Google Scholar

Seel, Gerhard. “Über den Grund der Lust an schönen Gegenständen. Kritische Fragen an die Ästhetik Kants.” In Kant: Analysen, Probleme, Kritik, Band III, edited by Oberer, Hariolf and Seel, Gerhard. Würzberg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1988, pp. 317–356.Google Scholar

Sellars, Wilfrid. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Teufel, Thomas. “Wholes that Cause Their Parts: Organic Self-reproduction and the Reality of Biological Teleology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2011): 252–260.Google Scholar

Uehling, Theodore E. Jr. The Notion of Form in Kant’s “Critique of Aesthetic Judgment.” The Hague: Mouton, 1971.Google Scholar

Walker, Ralph C. S. “Induction and Transcendental Argument.” In Transcendental Arguments: Problems and Prospects, edited by Stern, Robert. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999, pp. 13–29.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric. “Kant’s Model of Causality: Causal Powers, Laws, and Kant’s Reply to Hume.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2004): 449–488.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric. “The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment.” Kant Yearbook 1 (2009): 197–221.Google Scholar

Wicks, Robert. “Dependent Beauty as the Appreciation of Teleological Style.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (1997): 387–400.Google Scholar

Williams, Jessica J. “‘The Image of a Four-Footed Animal in General’: Kant on Empirical Schemata and the System of Nature.” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (2020): 1–23.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. History of the Art of Antiquity. Translated by Mallgrave, Harry Francis. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute, 2006.Google Scholar

Zammito, John H. The Genesis of Kant’s “Critique of Judgment.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Zinkin, Melissa. “Kant and the Pleasure of ‘Mere Reflection’.” Inquiry 55 (2012): 433–453.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the “Critique of Judgment.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Zumbach, Clark. “Kant’s Argument for the Autonomy of Biology.” Nature and System 3 (1981): 67–79.Google Scholar

Zumbach, Clark. The Transcendent Science: Kant’s Conception of Biological Methodology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1984.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive