Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T21:59:55.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Hazel Genn
Hazel Genn
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Judging Civil Justice , pp. 189 - 203
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, R.L., ‘The contradictions of informal justice’ in Abel, R.L. (ed.), The Politics of Informal Justice, Volume 1: The American Experience (Academic Press, 1982).
Ackerman, R.M. ‘Vanishing trial, vanishing community? The potential effect of the vanishing trial on America’s social capital’, Journal of Dispute Resolution, 7 (2006), 165–81.Google Scholar
Allan, J. ‘Judicial appointments in New Zealand’ in Malleson, K. and Russell, P.H. (eds), Appointing Judges in An Age of Judicial Power (University of Toronto Press, 2006), Chapter 5.
Allen, T., A Closer Look at Halsey and Steel (CEDR, 2004).
Andrews, N., Principles of Civil Procedure (Sweet and Maxwell, 1994).
Andrews, N., ‘English civil justice and remedies, progress and challenges, Nagoya Lectures’ (Nagoya University of Comparative Study of Civil Justice, 2007), Vol. I.
Attorney General Victoria, Justice Statement (Melbourne: Department of Justice, 2004).
Australian Government Productivity Commission, ‘Justice’, Report on Government Services, Vol. I, Part C (2008).Google Scholar
Australian Law Reform Commission, Review of the Federal Civil Justice System, Discussion Paper 62 (Sydney: ALRC, 1999).
Australian Law Reform Commission, Managing Justice: A Review of the Federal Civil Justice System, Report 89 (Sydney: ALRC, 2000).
Baldwin, J., Small Claims in County Courts in England and Wales: The Bargain Basement of Civil Justice? (Clarendon Press, 1997).
Baldwin, J., Monitoring the Rise of the Small Claims Limit: Litigants’ Experiences of Different Forms of Adjudication (Lord Chancellor’s Department, 1997).
Baldwin, J., ‘Small claims hearings: the “interventionist” role played by district judges’, Civil Justice Quarterly 17:1 (1998), 20–34.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J., Lay and Judicial Perspectives on the Expansion of the Small Claims Regime (Lord Chancellor’s Department Research Series 8/02, 2002).
Barak, A., The Judge in a Democracy (Princeton University Press, 2006).
Baruch Bush, R.A. and Folger, J.P., The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict (Jossey-Bass, 2005).
Baum, L., The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior (University of Michigan Press, 1997).
Baum, L., Judges and their Audiences (Princeton University Press, 2006).
Bayles, M., ‘Principles for legal procedure’, Law and Philosophy, 5:1 (1986), 33–57.Google Scholar
Bell, J., Judiciaries Within Europe: A Comparative Review (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Bernard, P.E. ‘Minorities, mediation and method: the view from one court-connected mediation program’, Fordham Urban Law Journal, 35:1 (January 2008).Google Scholar
Bingham, Lord, The Business of Judging (Oxford University Press, 2000).
Bingham, Lord, ‘The rule of law’, Sixth David Williams Annual Lecture, Centre for Public Law, Cambridge University (November 2006).
Blader, S. and Tyler, T.R., ‘A four component model of procedural justice: defining the meaning of a “fair” process’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (2003), 747–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondy, V., Doyle, M. and Reid, V., ‘Mediation and judicial review – mind the research gap’, Judicial Review (September 2005).Google Scholar
Bondy, V. and Sunkin, M., ‘Accessing judicial review’, Public Law (Winter 2008), 647–67.Google Scholar
British Columbia Civil Justice Review Task Force, Effective and Affordable Civil Justice, (British Columbia Justice Review, November 2006).
Brooke, H., ‘The future of civil justice, an address to the Civil Court Users Association’, (26 March 2006).
Brooke, H., Should the Civil Courts be Unified? (Judicial Office, August 2008).
Brown, H. and Marriott, A., ADR Principles and Practice, 2nd edn (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1999).
Buck, A., Pleasence, P. and Balmer, N., ‘Do citizens know how to deal with legal issues? Some empirical insights’, Journal of Social Policy, 37:4 (2008), 661–81.Google Scholar
Butler, P., ‘The case for trials: considering the intangibles’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3, (2004), 627–36.Google Scholar
Campbell, E. and Lee, H.P., The Australian Judiciary (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Canadian Bar Association, Task Force on Systems of Civil Justice (Canadian Bar Association, 1996).
Canadian Forum on Civil Justice, Public Perceptions of the Role of the Judiciary (University of Alberta, 2005).
CEDR, The CEDR Mediator Handbook: Effective Resolution of Commercial Disputes, 4th edn (CEDR, 2004).
Civil Justice Reform Working Group, Effective and Affordable Civil Justice (Vancouver: Justice Review Task Force, 2006).
Conley, J.M. and O’Barr, W.M., ‘Fundamentals of jurisprudence: an ethnography of judicial decision making in informal courts’, North Carolina Law Review, 66 (1988), 467–508.Google Scholar
Coumarelos, C., Wei, Z. and Zhou, A., Justice Made to Measure: NSW Legal Needs Survey in Disadvantaged Areas (Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales, Australia, 2006).
Couture, E.J., ‘The nature of the judicial process’, Tulane Law Review, 25 (1950), 1–28.Google Scholar
Cowan, D. and Hitchings, E., ‘Pretty boring stuff’: district judges and housing possession proceedings’, Social & Legal Studies, 16:3 (2007), 363–82.Google Scholar
Cranston, R., How Law Works: The Machinery and Impact of Civil Justice (Oxford University Press, 2006).
Cross, F.B., ‘Judicial partisanship and obedience to legal doctrine: whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals’, Yale Law Journal, 107 (1998), 2155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, F.B., Decision Making in the US Courts of Appeals (Stanford University Press, 2007).
Damaska, M.R.The Faces of Justice and State Authority (Yale University Press, 1986).
Darbyshire, P. ‘Where do English and Welsh judges come from?’, Cambridge Law Journal, 66:2 (2007), 365–88.Google Scholar
Davies, G.L., ‘Civil justice reform: why we need to question some basic assumptions’, Civil Justice Quarterly, 25 (2006), 32–51.Google Scholar
Delgado, R. et al., ‘Fairness and formality: minimizing the risk of prejudice in alternative dispute resolution’, Wisconsin Law Review (1985), 1359.Google Scholar
Denning, Lord, The Discipline of Law (Oxford University Press, 1979).
Dhavan, R., Sudarshan, R. and Khurshid, S., Judges and the Judicial Power: Essays in Honour of Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer (Sweet and Maxwell, 1985).
Dingwall, R. and Cloatre, E., ‘Vanishing trials?: An English perspective’, Journal of Dispute Resolution, 7 (2006), 51–70.Google Scholar
Doyle, M., Manchester Small Claims Mediation Scheme Evaluation (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2006).
Draper, A.J., ‘Corruptions in the administration of justice: Bentham’s Critique of Civil Procedure, 1806–1811’, Journal of Bentham Studies, 7 (2004).Google Scholar
Eekelaar, J., ‘Family justice: ideal or illusion? Family law and communitarian values’ in Freeman, M.D.A. (ed.), Current Legal Problems (Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 161–216.
Ekman, P., Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics and Marriage (W.W. Norton & Co, 2001).
Engel, D.M. and Steele, E.H., ‘Civil cases and society: process and order in the civil justice system’, American Bar Foundation Research Journal (1979), 295–346.Google Scholar
Enterken, J. and Sefton, M., Evaluation of Reading Small Claims Mediation Scheme (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2006).
Epstein, L. (ed.), Courts and Judges (The International Library of Essays in Law and Society) (Ashgate, 2005).
Epstein, L. and Knight, J., The Choices Justices Make (C.Q. Press, 1998).
Feenan, D., ‘Women judges: gendering judging, justifying diversity’, Journal of Law and Society, 35:4 (2008), 490–519.Google Scholar
Feenan, D., ‘Women and judging’, Feminist Legal Studies, 17 (2009), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenn, P., Rickman, N. and Vencappa, D., ‘The impact of the Woolf Reforms on costs and delay’ (Centre for Risk & Insurance Studies, 2009).
Fiss, O.M., ‘Against settlement’, Yale Law Journal, 93 (1984), 1073–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiss, O.M. and Resnik, J., Adjudication and its Alternatives: An Introduction to Procedure (Foundation Press, 2003).
Frank, J., Courts on Trial, Myth and Beauty in American Justice (Princeton University Press, 1949).
Friedman, L.M., Total Justice (Russell Sage Foundation, 1994).
Friedman, L.M., ‘The day before trials vanished’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 689–703.Google Scholar
Friedman Goldstein, L., ‘From democracy to juristocracy’, Law and Society Review, 38 (2004), 611–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, L.L., ‘The forms and limits of adjudication’, Harvard Law Review, 92 (1978), 353–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Further Findings: A Continuing Evaluation of the Civil Justice Reforms (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2002).
Galanter, M., ‘The radiating effects of courts’ in Boyum, K. and Mather, L. (eds), Empirical Theories About Courts (New York, 1983).
Galanter, M., ‘The vanishing trial: an examination of trials and related matters in federal and state courts’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 459–570.Google Scholar
Galanter, M., Lowering the Bar, Lawyer Jokes and Legal Culture (University of Wisconsin Press, 2005).
Galanter, M., ‘A world without trials’, Journal of Dispute Resolution, 7 (2006), 7–34.Google Scholar
Galanter, M., ‘In the winter of our discontent: law, anti–law and social science’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(2006), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garth, B., ‘From civil litigation to private justice: legal practice at war with the profession and its values’, Brooklyn Law Review, 59 (1993), 931–60.Google Scholar
Genn, H., ‘Understanding civil justice’ in Freeman, M.D.A. (ed.), Law and Public Opinion in the 20th Century, Current Legal Problems Vol. 50 (Oxford University Press, 1997).
Genn, H., Central London Pilot Mediation Scheme, Evaluation Report (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 1998).
Genn, H., Paths to Justice: What People Think and Do About Going to Law (Hart Publishing, 1999).
Genn, H., Court Based ADR Initiatives for Non-Family Civil Cases (Department for Constitutional Affairs, Research series 1/02, 2002).
Genn, H., The Pre-Woolf Litigation Landscape in the County Courts (September 2002), www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/genn.
Genn, H., Solving Civil Justice Problems: What Might Be Best (Scottish Consumer Council Seminar on Civil Justice, January 2005), www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/genn.
Genn, H., The Attractiveness of Senior Judicial Appointment to Highly Qualified Practitioners (Judicial Office for England, December 2008).
Genn, H. et al., Tribunals for Diverse Users (London: Department for Constitutional Affairs, Research Series 1/06, 2006).
Genn, H. et al., Twisting Arms: Court Referred and Court Linked Mediation Under Judicial Pressure (Ministry of Justice Research Series 1/07, 2007).
Genn, H. and Genn, Y., Representation in Tribunals (Lord Chancellor’s Department, 1989).
Glendon, M.A., A Nation Under Lawyers (Harvard University Press, 1996).
Goode, R., Commercial Law in the Next Millennium, 49th Hamlyn Lectures (Sweet and Maxwell, 1998).
Gramatikov, M., ‘Multiple Justiciable Problems in Bulgaria’, Tilburg University Legal Studies Working Paper No. 16/2008 (2008).
Grillo, T., ‘The mediation alternative: process dangers for women’, Yale Law Journal, 100:6 (1991), 1545–610.Google Scholar
Guarneri, C. and Pederzoli, P., From Democracy to Juristocracy? The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy (Oxford University Press, 2002).
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J.J. and Wistrich, A.J., ‘Inside the judicial mind’, Cornell Law Review, 86 (2001), 777.Google Scholar
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J.J. and Wistrich, A.J., ‘Blinking on the bench: how judges decide cases’, Cornell Law Review, 93 (2007), 1–43.Google Scholar
Hadfield, G.K., ‘Where have all the trials gone? Settlement, non-trial adjudications, and statistical artifacts in the changing disposition of federal civil cases’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 705–34.Google Scholar
Hale, B., ‘Equality and the judiciary: why should we want more women judges?’, Public Law (2001), 489.Google Scholar
Hann, R.G. and Baar, C., Evaluation of the Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program (Rule 24.1): Final Report – The First 23 Months, (Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, March 2001).
Hanycz, C.M., ‘Through the looking glass: mediator conceptions of philosophy, process and power’, Alberta Law Review, 42 (2004–5), 819–85.Google Scholar
Hanycz, C.M., ‘More access to less justice: efficiency, proportionality and costs in Canadian civil justice reform’, Civil Justice Quarterly, 27:1 (2008), 98–122.Google Scholar
Hensler, D.R., ‘Suppose it’s not true: challenging mediation ideology’, Journal of Dispute Resolution (2002), 81–100.Google Scholar
Hensler, D.R., ‘Our courts, ourselves: how the alternative dispute resolution movement is re-shaping our legal system’, Penn State Law Review, 108 (2003), 167–97.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, P.E., ‘So why do we call them trial courts?, Southern Methodist University Law Review, 55 (2002), 1405–21.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R., Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, 2004).
Hirschl, R., ‘Juristocracy – political, not juridical’, The Good Society, 13:3 (2004), 6–11.Google Scholar
Hollander-Blumoff, R. and Tyler, T.R., ‘Procedural justice in negotiation: procedural fairness, outcome acceptance, and integrative potential’, Law and Social Inquiry, 33:2 (2008), 473–500.Google Scholar
Hong Kong Department of Justice, Consultancy Study on the Demand for and Supply of Legal and Related Services (Hong Kong Department of Justice, 2008).
Hong Kong Judiciary, Reform of the Civil Justice System in Hong Kong, Final Report of the Working Party on Civil Justice Reform (Hong Kong Judiciary, 2004).
House of Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee, ‘Civil legal aid: adequacy of provision’, Conclusions and Recommendations (Fourth Report of Session 2003–04), Vol. I, HC 391–I.Google Scholar
Hyman, J.M. and Love, L.P., ‘If Portia were a mediator: an inquiry into justice in mediation’, Clinical Law Review, 9 (2002), 157.Google Scholar
Jackson, Lord Justice, Civil Litigation Costs Review, Preliminary Report (Judicial Office, 8 May 2009).
Jacob, Sir J., ‘The reform of civil procedural law’, reprinted in The Reform of Civil Procedural Law and Other Essays in Civil Procedure (Sweet and Maxwell, 1982).
Jacob, Sir J., The Fabric of English Civil Justice (Sweet and Maxwell, 1987).
Jacob, J.M., Civil Justice in the Age of Human Rights (Ashgate, 2007).
Jacobs, Sir J., ‘Access to justice in England’ in Cappelletti, M. and Garth, B. (eds), Access to Justice, Vol 1: a World Survey (Alphen aan den Rhijn/Milan, 1978).
Jolowicz, J.A., On Civil Procedure (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Justice for All, White Paper (The Stationery Office, 2002), CM 5563.
Kenney, S.J., ‘Gender on the agenda: how the paucity of women judges became an issue’, Journal of Politics, 70:3 (2008), 717–35.Google Scholar
Kirby, M., Judicial Activism: Authority, Principle and Policy in the Judicial Method, The Hamlyn Lectures 55th Series (Sweet and Maxwell, 2004).
Kleinig, J., ‘Judicial corrosion: outlines of a theory’, Conference on Confidence in the Judiciary (Canberra, February 2007).
Kritzer, H.M., ‘Disappearing trials? A comparative perspective’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 735–54.Google Scholar
Kritzer, H.M., ‘Towards a theorization of judgecraft’, Social & Legal Studies, 16:3 (2007), 321–40.Google Scholar
Lacey, N., The Prisoner’s Dilemma, The Hamlyn Lectures 59th Series (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
LaFree, G. and Rack, C., ‘The effects of participants’ ethnicity and gender on monetary outcomes in mediated and adjudicated civil cases’, Law and Society Review, 30 (1996), 767–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, J., ‘How much justice can we afford? Defining the courts’ roles and deciding the appropriate number of trials, settlement signals, and other elements needed to administer justice’, Journal of Dispute Resolution (2006), 213.Google Scholar
Landsman, S., ‘So what? Possible implications of the vanishing trial phenomenon’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 973–84.Google Scholar
Legal Services Consultation Document, A New Focus For Civil Legal Aid: Encouraging Early Resolution; Discouraging Unnecessary Litigation (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2004).
Leubsdorf, J., ‘The myth of civil procedure reform’ in Zuckerman, A.A.S. (ed.), Civil Justice in Crisis: Comparative Aspects of Civil Procedure (Oxford University Press, 1999), Chapter 2.
Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R., The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (Plenum, 1988).
Lines, M., ‘Empirical study of civil justice systems: a look at the literature’, Alberta Law Review, 42:3 (2005), 887–905.Google Scholar
Luban, D., Lawyers and Justice (Princeton University Press, 1988), p. 251.
Luban, D., ‘Settlements and the erosion of the public realm’, Georgetown Law Review, 83 (1995), 2638.Google Scholar
Mack, K. and Roach Anleu, S., ‘Getting through the list: judgecraft and legitimacy in the lower courts’, Social & Legal Studies, 16 (2007), 341–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, K., Miles, D., Marsh, W. and Allen, T., The ADR Practice Guide: Commercial Dispute Resolution, 3rd revised edition (Tottel Publishing, 2007).
Malleson, K., The New Judiciary: The Effects of Expansion and Activism (Ashgate Press, 1999).
Manning, K.L., Carroll, B.A. and Carp, R.A., ‘Does age matter? Judicial decision making in age discrimination cases’, Social Science Quarterly, 85:1 (March 2004), 1–18.Google Scholar
Marcus, R.L., ‘Malaise of the litigation superpower’ in Zuckerman, A.A.S., Civil Justice in Crisis, Comparative Perspectives of Litigation Procedure (Oxford University Press, 1999), Chapter 3.
Mautner, M., ‘Luck in the courts’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 9 (2008), 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwan, J., The Verdict of the Court, Passing Judgment in Law and Psychology (Hart Publishing, 2003).
McNeill, D., The Face (Hamish Hamilton, 1998).
Megarry, R.E., Lawyer and Litigant in England, The Hamlyn Lectures 14th Series (Stevens, 1962).
Memon, A., Vrij, A. and Bull, R., Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility, 2nd edn (John Wiley, 2003).
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘The many ways of mediation: the transformation of tradition, ideologies, paradigms and practices’, Negotiation Journal, 11 (1995), 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Whose dispute is it anyway? A philosophical and democratic defense of settlement (in some cases)’, Georgetown Law Journal, 83 (1995), 2663–96.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘The trouble with the adversary system in a postmodern, multicultural world’, William and Mary Law Review, 38 (1996), 5–44.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Ethics in Alternative dispute resolution: new issues, no answers from the adversary conception of lawyers’ responsibilities’, South Texas Law Review, 38:2 (1997), 407–54.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Mothers and fathers of invention: the intellectual founders of ADR’, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 16:1 (2000), 1–37.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. (ed.), Mediation: Theory, Policy and Practice (Ashgate, 2001).
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Peace and justice: notes on the evolution and purposes of legal processes’, Georgetown Law Journal, 94 (2006), 553–80.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R.H. and Kornhauser, L., ‘Bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce’, Yale Law Journal, 88 (1979), 950–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molot, J.T., ‘An old judicial role for a new litigation era’, Yale Law Journal, 113 (2003), 27–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhead, R. and Cowan, D., ‘Judgecraft: an introduction’, Social & Legal Studies, 16:3 (2007), 315–20.Google Scholar
Moorhead, R. and Sefton, M., Litigants in Person: Unrepresented Litigants in First Instance Proceedings (Department for Constitutional Affairs, Research Series, 2005).
Moorhead, R., Sefton, M. and Scanlan, L., Just Satisfaction? What Drives Public and Participant Satisfaction with Courts and Tribunals (Ministry of Justice, Research Series 5/08, 2008).
Mulcahy, L., ‘The possibilities and desirability of mediator neutrality – towards an ethics of partiality?’, Social & Legal Studies, 10:4 (2001), 505–27.Google Scholar
Murayama, M., ‘Experiences of problems and disputing behaviour in Japan’, Meiji Law Journal, 14 (2007), 1–59.Google Scholar
Niemeijer, B. and Pel, M., ‘Court-based mediation in the Netherlands: research, evaluation and future expectations’, Penn State Law Review, 110:2 (2005), 345–79.Google Scholar
Nolan-Haley, J.M., ‘Court mediation and the search for justice through law’, Washington University Law Quarterly (January 1996), 49.Google Scholar
Olson, S.M. and Huth, D.A., ‘Explaining public attitudes toward local courts’, Justice System Journal, 20 (1998), 41.Google Scholar
Paterson, A.A. and Goriely, T., A Reader on Resourcing Civil Justice, Oxford Readings in Socio-Legal Studies (Oxford University Press, 1996).
Pleasence, P., Balmer, N.J., Tam, T., Buck, A., Smith, M. and Patel, A., Civil Justice in England and Wales: Report of the 2007 English and Welsh Civil and Social Justice Survey (Legal Services Commission, 2008), LSRC Research Paper No. 22.
Pleasence, P., Buck, A., Balmer, N., Genn, H., O’Grady, A. and Smith, M., Causes of Action: Civil Law and Social Justice (The Stationery Office, 2004).
Posner, R.A., ‘What do judges and justices maximize? (The same thing everybody else does)’, Supreme Court Economic Review, 3 (1993), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R.A., How Judges Think (Harvard University Press, 2008).
Prince, S., Evaluation of Exeter Small Claims Mediation Scheme (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2006).
Prince, S., ‘ADR after the CPR’ in Dwyer, D. (ed.), The Civil Procedure Rules Ten Years On (Oxford University Press, 2009).
Prince, S. and Belcher, S., An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Court-based Mediation Processes in Non-Family Civil Proceedings at Exeter and Guildford County Courts (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2006).
Radcliffe, Lord, Not in Feather Beds (Hamish Hamilton, 1968).
Reid, Lord, The Law and the Reasonable Man (Proceedings of the British Academy, 1968).
Resnik, J., ‘Managerial judges’, Harvard Law Review, 96 (1982), 374–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnik, J., ‘Many doors? Closing doors? Alternative dispute resolution and adjudication’, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 10:2 (1995), 211–65.Google Scholar
Resnik, J., ‘Trial as error, jurisdiction as injury: transforming the meaning of Article III’, Harvard Law Review, 113 (2000), 924–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnik, J., ‘Mediating preferences: litigant preferences for process and judicial preferences for settlement’, Journal of Dispute Resolution (2002), 155–69.Google Scholar
Resnik, J., ‘Migrating, morphing, and vanishing: the empirical and normative puzzles of declining trial rates in courts’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 783–841.Google Scholar
Resnik, J., ‘Courts: in and out of sight, site and cite’, Villanova Law Review, 53 (2008), 771–810.Google Scholar
Resnik, J. and Curtis, D., ‘Representing justice: from Renaissance iconography to twenty-first century courthouses’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 151 (2007), 139.Google Scholar
Roach Anleu, S. and Mack, K., ‘Magistrates’ everyday work and emotional labour’, Journal of Law and Society, 32:4 (2005), 590–614.Google Scholar
Robertson, D., Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords (Oxford University Press, 1998).
Rottman, D.B., Public Trust and Confidence in the State Courts: A Primer, National Center for State Courts, Working Paper (March 1999).
Sackville, Justice R., ‘From access to justice to managing justice: the transformation of the judicial role’, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Annual Conference, ‘Access to Justice – The Way Forward’, Brisbane, Queensland (12–14 July 2002).
Sallmann, P. A. and Wright, R.T., Going to Court: A Discussion Paper on Civil Justice in Victoria, Civil Justice Review Project (Victoria Department of Justice, 2000).
Sandefur, R.L., ‘Access to civil justice and race, class, and gender inequality’, Annual Review of Sociology, 34 (2008), 339–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, K.E., ‘Two models of the civil process’, Stanford Law Review, 27:3 (1975), 937–50.Google Scholar
Sherry, S., ‘Civil virtue and the feminine voice in constitutional adjudication’, Virginia Law Review, 72 (1986), 543–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisk, G.C., ‘The quantitative moment and the qualitative opportunity: legal studies of judicial decision making’ (book review), Cornell Law Review, 93:2 (2008), 873.Google Scholar
Sisk, G.C. and Heise, M., ‘Judges and ideology: public and academic debates about statistical measures’, Northwestern University Law Review, 99 (2005), 743.Google Scholar
Sisk, G.C., Heise, M. and Morriss, A.P., ‘Charting the influences on the judicial mind: an empirical study of judicial reasoning’, New York University Law Review, 73 (1998), 1377–500.Google Scholar
Sisk, G.C., Heise, M. and Morriss, A.P., ‘Searching for the soul of judicial decision making: an empirical study of religious freedom decisions’, Ohio State Law Journal, 65:3 (2004), 491.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (ed.), Achieving Civil Justice: Appropriate Dispute Resolution for the 1990s (Legal Action Group, 1996).
Solum, L.B., ‘Procedural justice’, Southern California Law Review, 78 (2004), 181.Google Scholar
Stipanowick, T.J., ‘ADR and the ‘vanishing trial’: the growth and impact of alternative dispute resolution’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 843–912.Google Scholar
Strasser, F. and Randolph, P., Mediation: A Psychological Insight into Conflict Resolution (Continuum, 2004).
Stratton, M., ‘Public perceptions of the role of the Canadian judiciary’, The Canadian Forum on Civil Justice (December 2005).Google Scholar
Stulberg, J.B., ‘Mediation and justice: what standards govern?’ Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6 (2005), 213–45.Google Scholar
Sun, I.Y. and Wu, Y., ‘Citizens’ perceptions of the courts: the impact of race, gender and recent experience’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 34 (2006), 457–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susskind, R., The End of Lawyers: Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Tamanaha, B., On The Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
Thomas, Lord Justice, Senior Presiding Judge of England and Wales, The Maintenance of Local Justice, The Sir Elwyn Jones Memorial Lecture (Bangor University, October 2004).
Van de Walle, S. and Raine, J.W., Explaining Attitudes Towards the Justice System in the UK and Europe (Ministry of Justice Research Series 9/08, 2008).
Victorian Law Reform Commission, Civil Justice Review, Report 14 (Victorian Law Reform Commission, 28 May 2008).
Voight, S. ‘Economic growth, certainty in the law and judicial independence’ in Transparency International, Global Corruption Report 2007: Corruption in Judicial Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Vrij, A., Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice (Wiley, 2000).
Waldron, J., ‘Lucky in your judge’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 9:1 (January 2008), 185–216.Google Scholar
Webley, L., Abrams, P. and Bacquet, S., Evaluation of Birmingham Fast and Multi Track Mediation Scheme (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2006).
Welsh, N., ‘Making deals in court-connected mediation: what’s justice got to do with it?’, Washington University Law Quarterly, 79 (2001), 787–860.Google Scholar
Woo, M.K. and Wang, Y., ‘Civil justice in China: An empirical study of courts in three provinces’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 53 (2005), 911.Google Scholar
Lord, Woolf, The Rt Hon., Access to Justice: Interim Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales (HMSO, 1995).
Lord, Woolf, The Rt Hon., The Pursuit of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Wright, T., ‘Australia: a need for clarity’, Justice System Journal, Special Issue on Understanding Civil Justice Reform in Anglo–American Legal Systems, 20 (1999), 131.
Yeazell, S.C., ‘Getting what we asked for, getting what we paid for, and not liking what we got: the vanishing civil trial’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 943–71.Google Scholar
Zander, M., The State of Justice, Hamlyn Lectures 51st Series (Sweet and Maxwell, 2000).
Zuckerman, A.A.S., ‘Justice in crisis: comparative aspects of civil procedure’ in Zuckerman, A.A.S. (ed.), Civil Justice in Crisis: Comparative Aspects of Civil Procedure (Oxford University Press, 1999).
Zuckerman, A.A.S., Civil Procedure (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003).
Zuckerman, A.A.S. and Cranston, R. (eds), The Reform of Civil Procedure: Essays on Access to Justice (Clarendon Press, 1996).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Hazel Genn, University College London
  • Book: Judging Civil Justice
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192378.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Hazel Genn, University College London
  • Book: Judging Civil Justice
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192378.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Hazel Genn, University College London
  • Book: Judging Civil Justice
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192378.007
Available formats
×