Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:46:25.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2024

Edited by
David Collins  and
Christopher Williams
David Collins
Affiliation:
Churchill College, Cambridge
Christopher Williams
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Interpreting R. G. Collingwood
Critical Essays
 , pp. 280 - 297
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Adorno, Theodor, The Culture Industry, ed. Bernstein, J. M. (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Allen, John Romilly, Celtic Art in Pagan and Pre-Christian Times (London: Methuen, 1904).Google Scholar
Alpers, Svetlana, and Baxandall, Michael, Tiepolo and the Pictorial Intelligence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Austin, John L., Sense and Sensibilia (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J., “Demonstration of the Impossibility of Metaphysics,” Mind, 43, no. 171 (1934): 335–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A. J., Logical Positivism (New York: The Free Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J., Part of My Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J., Language, Truth and Logic (London: Penguin Books, 1990 [1936]; second edn. Mineola, NY: Dover, 1952 [London: Gollancz, 1946]).Google Scholar
Barés-Gómez, Cristina, and Fontaine, Mathieu, “Argumentation and Abduction in Dialogical Logic,” in Magnani, Lorenzo and Bertolotti, Tommaso, eds., Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science, 295–314 (Dordrecht: Springer, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxandall, Michael, Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Baxandall, Michael, “The Language of Art History,” New Literary History, 10 (1979): 453–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxandall, Michael, Patterns of Intention: On the Historical Explanation of Pictures (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985a).Google Scholar
Baxandall, Michael, “Art, Society, and the Bouguer Principle,” Representations, 12 (1985b): 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxandall, Michael, “Substance, Sensation, and Perception: Michael Baxandall,” interviewer, Richard Cándida Smith, Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities (1998): https://archive.org/details/substancesensati00baxa/page/n21/mode/2up.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael, “Collingwood’s Conception of Presuppositional Analysis,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 11, no. 2 (2005): 41–114.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael, “Rex Martin’s Reading of Collingwood’s Essay on Metaphysics,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 12, no. 1 (2006): 83–102.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael, “Collingwood’s Critique of Oxbridge Realism,” in Boucher, David and Smith, Teresa, eds., R. G. Collingwood: An Autobiography and Other Writings, 247–70 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C., The Romantic Imperative: The Concept of Early German Romanticism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Bell, Clive, Civilization: An Essay (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1938).Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri, Creative Evolution, trans. Arthur Mitchell (Mineola, NY: Dover, 1907).Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri, The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. M. L. Andison (Mineola, NY: Dover, 1934).Google Scholar
Bertoldi, Eugene, “Gadamer’s Criticisms of Collingwood,” Idealistic Studies, 14 (1984): 213–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, Simon, “Re-enactment as Critique of Logical Analysis: Wittgensteinian Themes in Collingwood,” in Kogler, Hans H. and Stueber, Karsten, eds., Empathy and Agency: The Problem of Understanding in the Human Sciences, 270–87 (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon, Truth: A Guide (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Blagg, T. F. C., “Art and Architecture,” in Todd, Malcolm, ed., Research on Roman Britain, Britannia Monograph Series 11, 203–17 (Oxford: Oxbow, 1989).Google Scholar
Boucher, David, The Social and Political Thought of R. G. Collingwood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, David, and Smith, Teresa, eds., R. G. Collingwood: An Autobiography and Other Writings: With Essays on Collingwood’s Life and Work (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Delsaut, Yvette, “Pour une sociologie de la perception,” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 40 (1981): 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwsma, Oets K., Wittgenstein: Conversations 1949–1951, eds. Craft, J. L. and Hustwit, R. E. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1986).Google Scholar
Braaksma, Ymko, “‘The Babblings of Pragmatism’: Reconstructing R. G. Collingwood’s Rejection of F. C. S. Schiller’s Pragmatism in Speculum Mentis,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 27, no. 2 (2021): 241–66.Google Scholar
Braaksma, Ymko, “All Thought Exists for the Sake of Action: The Historical and Philosophical Relations between R. G. Collingwood and Classical Pragmatism,” PhD thesis (University of Groningen, 2022).Google Scholar
Bradley, Francis Herbert, Appearance and Reality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1897).Google Scholar
Bradley, Francis Herbert, Essays on Truth and Reality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1914).Google Scholar
Broadbent, Alex, Philosophy of Epidemiology (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Gary, Rethinking Collingwood: Philosophy, Politics and the Unity of Theory and Practice (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf, History and Eschatology (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Burns, Robert M., “Collingwood, Bradley, and Historical Knowledge,” History and Theory, 45, no. 2 (2006): 178–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Evan William, “From Plato to Socrates: Wittgenstein’s Journey on Collingwood’s Map,” AE: Canadian Aesthetics Journal, 10 (2004): 1–33.Google Scholar
Campos, Daniel G., “On the Distinction between Peirce’s Abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the Best Explanation,” Synthese, 180 (2011): 419–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolph, “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, no. 11 (1950): 20–40.Google Scholar
Cassin, Barbara, ed., Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cellucci, Carlo, Filosofia e Matematica (Bari: Laterza, 2002).Google Scholar
Cellucci, Carlo, Rethinking Logic: Logic in Relation to Mathematics, Evolution, and Method (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cellucci, Carlo, Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View (Cham: Springer, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cellucci, Carlo, The Making of Mathematics: Heuristic Philosophy of Mathematics (Cham: Springer, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravartty, Anjan, Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, David, “Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, no. 3 (1995): 200–19.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David, The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok, “Pragmatism, Perspectivism, and the Historicity of Science,” in Massimi, Michaela and McCoy, Casey, eds., Understanding Perspectivism: Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects, 10–27 (London: Routledge, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Hasok, Realism for Realistic People: A New Pragmatist Philosophy of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claeys, Gregory, Marx and Marxism (London: Penguin, 2018).Google Scholar
Cogburn, Jon, “Collingwood Paradoxicality and Reverse Collingwood Paradoxicality,” New APPS (2013): www.newappsblog.com/2013/07/collingwood-paradoxicality-and-reverse-collingwood-paradoxicality.html.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel T., “Biographia Literaria,” in Jackson, H. J., ed., Samuel Taylor Coleridge: The Major Works, 155–482 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985 [1817]).Google Scholar
Coliva, Annalisa, “Which Hinge Epistemology between Animal, Biscopic and Constitutivist?” in Sandis, Constantine and Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, eds., Extending Hinge Epistemology, 51–70 (London: Anthem Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., Religion and Philosophy (London: Macmillan and Co., 1916).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “The Purpose of the Roman Wall,” The Vasculum: The North Country Quarterly of Science and Local History, 8, no. 1 (1921): 4–9.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Sensation and Thought,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 24 (1923–24): 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., Speculum Mentis, or The Map of Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Aesthetic,” in McDowall, R. J. S., ed., The Mind: A Series of Lectures Delivered in King’s College, London, During the Lent Term, 1927, 214–44 (London: Longmans Green, 1927a).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Oswald Spengler and the Theory of Historical Cycles,” Antiquity, 1 (1927b): 311–25.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Review of Mikhail Rostovtzeff, The Social and Economic History of the Roman Empire,” Antiquity, 1 (1927c): 367–69.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Roman Signal-Stations on the Cumberland Coast,” Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society, 29 (1929a): 138–65.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Town and Country in Roman Britain,” Antiquity, 3 (1929b): 261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Roman-Celtic Art in Northumbria,” Archaeologia, 80 (1930): 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Hadrian’s Wall: 1921–1930,” Journal of Roman Studies, 21 (1931a): 36–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Review of C. J. Ducasse, The Philosophy of Art,” Philosophy, 6, no. 23 (1931b): 383–86.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., The Principles of Art (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1938).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., An Autobiography (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., The Idea of Nature (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1945).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., Denken, trans. Hans-Georg Gadamer (Stuttgart: Koehler, 1955a).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., Philosophie der Geschichte, trans. Gertrud Herding (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1955b).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., Essays in the Philosophy of History, ed. Debbins, William (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., The New Leviathan, or, Man, Civilization and Barbarism, revised edition, ed. Boucher, David (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992 [1942]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Goodness, Rightness, Utility,” in Boucher, David, ed., The New Leviathan, or, Man, Civilization and Barbarism, revised edition, 391–479 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992 [1942]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., The Idea of History, revised edition, ed. van der Dussen, Jan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993 [1946]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., An Essay on Metaphysics, revised edition, ed. Martin, Rex (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1940]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “The Nature of Metaphysical Study,” in Collingwood, An Essay on Metaphysics, ed. Martin, Rex, 356–78 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1934]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Function of Metaphysics in Civilization,” in Collingwood, An Essay on Metaphysics, ed. Martin, Rex, 379–421 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1938]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Notes for an Essay on Logic,” in Collingwood, An Essay on Metaphysics, ed. Martin, Rex, 422–28 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1939]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., The Principles of History, and Other Writings in the Philosophy of History, eds. Dray, William and van der Dussen, Jan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., An Essay on Philosophical Method, revised edition, eds. Connelly, James and D’Oro, Giuseppina (Oxford: University Press, 2005 [1933]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “The Correspondence between R. G. Collingwood and Gilbert Ryle,” in Collingwood, An Essay on Philosophical Method, eds. Connelly, James and D’Oro, Giuseppina, 253–326 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 [1935]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Libellus de Generatione: An Essay in Absolute Empiricism,” La Cultura, 57, no. 3 (2019 [1920]): 423–70.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., and Myres, John N. L., Roman Britain and the English Settlements (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936).Google Scholar
Collingwood, W. G., “Remains of the Pre-Norman Period,” in Wilson, James, ed., The Victoria History of the County of Cumberland, volume 1, 253–93 (London: Archibald Constable, 1901).Google Scholar
Collins, David, “Expression, Creation, and Discovery: Toward a Synthesized Processual Account of Art and Its Cognitive, Moral, and Social Value,” PhD thesis (McGill University, 2021).Google Scholar
Collins, David, “Articulating the Visible: Collingwood and Merleau-Ponty on Expression in Painting,” in Brassey, Vanessa and Matravers, Derek, eds., The Expression of Emotion in the Visual Arts, 105–26 (London: Routledge, 2024).Google Scholar
Conan Doyle, Arthur, The Complete Sherlock Holmes (Garden City: Doubleday & Co., 1970).Google Scholar
Condillac, Abbé de, Traité des Sensations, in Philosophical Writings of Etienne Bonnot, Abbé de Condillac, trans. Franklin Philip (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1982 [1754]).Google Scholar
Connelly, James, “Collingwood Controversies,” in Boucher, David and Smith, Teresa, eds., R. G. Collingwood: An Autobiography and Other Writings, 399–425 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Connelly, James, and Gadamer, Hans-Georg, “An Autobiography in Germany and Romania,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 13, no. 1 (2007): 5–26.Google Scholar
Connelly, James, Peter, Johnson, and Stephen, Leach, R. G. Collingwood: A Research Companion (London: Bloomsbury, 2009).Google Scholar
Cook Wilson, John, Statement and Inference, 2 volumes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1926).Google Scholar
Couse, G. S., “Collingwood’s Detective Image of the Historian and the Study of Hadrian’s Wall,” History and Theory, 29, no. 4 (1990): 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Malcolm, The Life and Work of W. G. Collingwood: A Wayward Compass in Lakeland (Oxford: Archaeopress, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croce, Benedetto, What Is Living and What Is Dead of the Philosophy of Hegel, trans. Douglas Ainslie (London: Macmillan, 1915).Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto, Logica come scienza del concetto puro (Bari: Laterza, 1981).Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto, Aesthetic: As Science of Expression and General Linguistic, revised edition, trans. Douglas Ainslie (London: Transaction Publishers, 1995 [1902]).Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C., Analytical Philosophy of History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Davies, David, “Collingwood’s ‘Performance’ Theory of Art,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 48, no. 2 (2008a): 162–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, David, “How Photographs ‘Signify’ the World,” in Walden, Scott, ed., Photography and Philosophy, 167–86 (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008b).Google Scholar
Davies, David, “Medium,” in Gracyk, Theodore and Kania, Andrew, eds., Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Music, 48–58 (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Davis, Whitney, “Art History, Re-enactment, and the Idiographic Stance,” in Mack, Peter and Williams, Robert, eds., Michael Baxandall: Vision and the Work of Words, 69–89 (Farnham: Ashgate, 2015).Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, Difference and Repetition, trans. Paul Patton (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995 [1968]).Google Scholar
D’Epiro, Peter, “Whose Vanity Must Be Pulled Down?” Paideuma: Modern and Contemporary Poetry and Poetics, 13, no. 2 (1984): 247–52.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass (London: Routledge, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deVries, Willem, “Getting Beyond Idealism,” in deVries, Willem, ed., Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars, 211–45 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John, Logic: The Theory of Inquiry (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1938).Google Scholar
Dewey, John, Experience and Nature (New York: Dover, 1958 [1925]).Google Scholar
Dharamsi, Karim, D’Oro, Giuseppina, and Leach, Stephen, eds., Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm, Die geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens. Gesammelte Schriften, Band 5 (Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1924).Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm, The Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences: Selected Works, Volume III (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Dilworth, John, “Is Ridley Charitable to Collingwood?” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56, no. 4 (1998): 393–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donagan, Allan, The Later Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1985).Google Scholar
D’Oro, Giuseppina, “Collingwood on Re-enactment and the Identity of Thought,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 38, no. 1 (2000): 84–101.Google ScholarPubMed
D’Oro, Giuseppina, Collingwood and the Metaphysics of Experience (London: Routledge, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Oro, Giuseppina, “The Touch of King Midas: Collingwood on Why Actions Are Not Events,” Philosophical Explorations, 21, no. 1 (2018): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Oro, Giuseppina, “Unlikely Bedfellows? Collingwood, Carnap and the Internal/External Distinction,” in Stern, Robert, ed., Idealism and Pragmatism: Traditions in Dialogue, 202–17 (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
D’Oro, Giuseppina, “Why the Attempt to Bury Metaphysics Failed,” iai News: An Online Magazine of Big Ideas (2022): https://iai.tv/articles/why-the-attempt-to-bury-metaphysics-failed-auid-2277.Google Scholar
D’Oro, Giuseppina, Why Collingwood Matters: A Defence of Humanistic Understanding (London: Bloomsbury, 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Oro, Giuseppina, and Connelly, James, “Robin George Collingwood,” in Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2020): https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/collingwood.Google Scholar
Dray, William H., Laws and Explanation in History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Dray, William H., ed., Philosophical Analysis and History (New York: Harper & Row, 1966).Google Scholar
Drury, Maurice O’C., “Conversations with Wittgenstein,” in Rhees, Rush, ed., Recollections of Wittgenstein, 97–171 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Dufrenne, Mikel, The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience, trans. Casey, Edward S. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
van der Dussen, Jan, “Collingwood’s Claim that History Is a Science,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 13, no. 2 (2007): 5–30.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Garssen, Bart, Greco, Sara, van Haaften, Ton, Labrie, Nanon, Leal, Fernando, and Peng, Wu, Argumentative Style: A Pragma-Dialectical Study of Functional Variety in Argumentative Discourse (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Garssen, Bart, Eric Krabbe, A. Snoeck Henkemans, Fransisca, Vertheij, Bart, and Wagemans, Jean, Handbook of Argumentation Theory (Cham: Springer, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, A. P. “R. G. Collingwood and the Hermeneutical Tradition,” International Studies in Philosophy 23 (1991): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul, Against Method (London: Verso, 1993 [1975]).Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob, “Der Gedanke: Eine logische Untersuchung,” Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, 2 (1918): 58–77.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar
Gabbay, Dov, and Woods, John, The Reach of Abduction: Insight and Trial (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005).Google Scholar
Gabbay, Dov, and Woods, John, “Advice on Abductive Logic,” Logic Journal of the IGPL, 14, no. 2 (2006): 189–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, “Einleitung,” in Collingwood, R. G., Denken, v–xiv (Stuttgart: Koehler, 1995).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Philosophical Hermeneutics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Platos dialektische Ethik, second edition (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1983).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, The Idea of the Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, “The Problem of Historical Consciousness,” in Rabinow, Paul and Sullivan, William M., eds., Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look, 82–140 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method (New York: Continuum, 1989).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Plato’s Dialectical Ethics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, “Introduction to Denken, the German Translation of An Autobiography,” The Collingwood Journal, spring issue (1992): 9–14.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Gesammelte Werke, 10 volumes (Tübingen: J. C. B. Möhr, 1985–95).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, “What Is Truth?” in Wachterhauser, Brice, ed., Hermeneutics and Truth, 33–46 (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, L’herméneutique en perspective, Ire et IIe parties (Paris: Vrin, 2005).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Hermeneutics between History and Philosophy: The Selected Writings of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Volume 1 (London: Bloomsbury, 2016).Google Scholar
Gardiner, Patrick, ed., Theories of History (New York: The Free Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Gardiner, Patrick, The Philosophy of History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald, Scientific Perspectivism (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, Philip, Consciousness and Fundamental Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Daniel, “The Implications of Fundamental Cause Theory for Priority Setting,” American Journal of Public Health, 104, no. 10 (2014): 1839–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, Daniel, “Fundamental Cause Theory,” in Venkatapuram, Sridhar and Broadbent, Alex, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Public Health, 85–97 (Oxford: Taylor & Francis, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, second edition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Francisco, Plato and Heidegger: A Question of Dialogue (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Grant, John, “On Reading Collingwood’s Principles of Art,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 46, no. 2 (1987): 239–48.Google Scholar
Grondin, Jean, Hans-Georg Gadamer: A Biography (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul, “Re-enactment, Reconstruction and the Freedom of the Imagination: Collingwood on History and Art,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 26, no. 4 (2018): 738–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Knowledge and Human Interests, second edition (New York: Beacon Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Haddock, Bruce, “The Historicity of Thought,” in Boucher, David and Smith, Teresa, eds., R. G. Collingwood: An Autobiography and Other Writings, 335–52. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Hanson, Norwood Russell, Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert, “The Inference to the Best Explanation,” Philosophical Review, 74 (1965): 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alexandra, Romantic Moderns (London: Thames & Hudson, 2010).Google Scholar
Haverfield, Francis J., The Romanization of Roman Britain, second edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1912).Google Scholar
Haverfield, Francis J. The Roman Occupation of Britain, revised by George MacDonald (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924).Google Scholar
Heil, John, Appearance in Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl, “The Function of General Laws in History,” Journal of Philosophy 39 (1942): 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henig, Martin, The Art of Roman Britain (London: Batsford, 1995).Google Scholar
Hermann, Hilde, “Philosophie zwischen Hegel und Heidegger: Zu Hans-Georg Gadamers Kölner Vortrag über ‘Europäische Historismus’,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 47, no. 25 (1952): 4.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko, Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery (Dordrecht: Springer, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko, and Hintikka, Merrill B., “Sherlock Holmes Confronts Modern Logic: Towards a Theory of Information-Seeking through Questioning,” in Barth, E. M. and Martens, J. L., eds., Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation, 55–76 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko, and Remes, Unto, The Method of Analysis: Its Geometrical Origin and Its General Significance (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Macpherson, C. B. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985 [1651]).Google Scholar
Hogan, John P., “Hermeneutics and the Logic of Question and Answer: Collingwood and Gadamer,” Heythrop Journal 28 (1987): 263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, John P., Collingwood and Theological Hermeneutics (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1989).Google Scholar
Holly, Michael Ann, “Patterns in the Shadows: Attention in/to the Writings of Michael Baxandall,” in Adrian Rifkin, About Michael Baxandall, 5–16 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999).Google Scholar
Hospers, John, “The Concept of Artistic Expression,” Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society, new series, 55 (1954–55): 313–44.Google Scholar
Hospers, John, “The Croce-Collingwood Theory of Art,” Philosophy, 31 (1956): 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978 [1888]).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, “Philosophy as Rigorous Science,” in Lauer, Quentin, ed., Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, 71–147. (New York: Harper, 1965 [1910]).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Logical Investigations, volume 1, trans. J. N. Findlay (London: Routledge, 1970 [1900]).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time, trans. John Barnett Brough (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001).Google Scholar
Hylton, Peter, Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglis, Fred, History Man: The Life of R. G. Collingwood (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, James R., Robert Boyle and the English Revolution: A Study in Social and Intellectual Change (New York: Franklin, 1977).Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret C., The Newtonians and the English Revolution: 1689–1720 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William, “A World of Pure Experience,” The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 1, no. 21 (1904): 561–70.Google Scholar
James, William, Essays in Radical Empiricism, eds. Bowers, Fredson and Skrupskelis, Ignas (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976 [1912]).Google Scholar
James, William, A Pluralistic Universe, in Kuklick, Bruce, ed., William James: Writings 1902–1910, 625–819 (New York: Library of America, 1987 [1909]).Google Scholar
Janik, Allan, “The Dichtung of Analytic Philosophy: Wittgenstein’s Legacy from Frege and Its Consequences,” in Bengtsson, G., Säätelä, S., and Pichler, A., eds., New Essays on Frege: Between Science and Literature, 143–57 (Cham: Springer, 2018).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen, The Establishment: And How They Get Away with It (London: Allen Lane, 2014).Google Scholar
Jope, E. M., Early Celtic Art in the British Isles (Oxford: Clarendon, 2000).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch,” in Reiss, Hans, ed., Kant: Political Writings, second edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 [1795]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of the Power of Judgment, ed. Guyer, Paul (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [1790]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanterian, Edward, “Philosophy as Poetry? Reflections on Wittgenstein’s Style,” Wittgenstein Studien, 3, no. 1 (2012): 95–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Thomas D., “British Hanging Bowls,” Antiquity, 6, no. 22 (1932): 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimhi, Irad, Thinking and Being (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Kindi, Vasso, “Collingwood, Wittgenstein, Strawson: Philosophy and Description,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 22, no. 1 (2016): 19–43.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, Science in a Democratic Society (New York: Prometheus, 2011a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, The Ethical Project (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, Preludes to Pragmatism: Toward a Reconstruction of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, Deaths in Venice: The Cases of Gustav Von Aschenbach (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Klagge, James, Wittgenstein’s Artillery: Philosophy as Poetry (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, Chinatsu, and Marion, Mathieu, “Gadamer and Collingwood on Temporal Distance and Understanding,” History and Theory, 50 (2011): 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, Chinatsu, and Marion, Mathieu, “The Later Collingwood on Method: Re-enactment and Abduction,” in Dharamsi, Karim, D’Oro, Giuseppina, and Leach, Stephen, eds., Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology, 229–48 (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2017).Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Chinatsu, and Marion, Mathieu, “Collingwood as an Archaeologist and the Gabbay-Woods Schema for Abductive Reasoning,” in Gabbay, Dov, Magnani, Lorenzo, Park, Woosuk, and Pietarinen, Ahti-Veiko, eds., Natural Arguments: A Tribute to John Woods, 481–96 (London: College Publications, 2019).Google Scholar
Knox, T. M., “Preface,” in Collingwood, R. G., The Idea of History, v–xxiv (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1946).Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul, “History and Idealism: The Theory of R. G. Collingwood,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 23, no. 1 (2017): 9–29.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012 [1962]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuusela, Oskari, “Wittgenstein, Nietzsche, and Future Philosophers: The Notion of Truth in Philosophy,” in Zambito, Pascal and Takagi, Shunichi, eds., Wittgenstein and Nietzsche (New York: Routledge, 2024).Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre, “Proofs and Refutations,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 14, no. 53 (1963): 1–25; no. 54, 120–39; no. 55, 221–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre, Philosophical Papers, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Landes, Donald A., Merleau-Ponty and the Paradoxes of Expression (London: Bloomsbury, 2013).Google Scholar
Landes, Donald A., “Merleau-Ponty: A Bergsonian in the Making,” in Sinclair, Mark and Whistler, Dan, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Modern French Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024).Google Scholar
Langdale, Alan, “Interview with Michael Baxandall, February 3rd, 1994,” Journal of Art Historiography, 1 (2009): 1–31.Google Scholar
Lawn, Brian, The Rise and Decline of the Scholastic “Quaestio Disputata”: With Special Emphasis on Its Use in the Teaching of Medicine and Science (Leiden: Brill, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, Fernando, “On Philosophical Argumentation: Towards a Pragma-Dialectical Solution to a Puzzle,” Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8, no. 2 (2019): 173–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, Fernando, “On the Importance of Questioning within the Ideal Model of Critical Discussion,” Argumentation, 34, no. 4 (2020): 405–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, Fernando, “On Questions in Standard Pragma-Dialectics,” Quadripartita Ratio, 6, no. 11 (2021): 41–54.Google Scholar
Leal, Fernando, and Marraud, Hubert, How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell–Copleston Debate (Cham: Springer, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, E. T., Celtic Ornament in the British Isles (London: Clarendon Press, 1933).Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine, and Hookway, Christopher, “Pragmatism,” in Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2021): https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/pragmatism.Google Scholar
Lepenies, Wolf, Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology, trans. R. J. Hollingdale (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Levine, Joseph M., “The Autonomy of History: R. G. Collingwood and Agatha Christie,” Clio, 7, no. 2 (1978): 253–64.Google Scholar
Link, Bruce, and Phelan, Jo, “Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Disease,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, extra issue (1995): 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovibond, Sabina, “‘Ethical Living’ in the Media and in Philosophy,” in Lovibond, Essays on Ethics and Feminism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovibond, Sabina, “Philosophy, Literature, Politics: The Cases of Rorty and Collingwood,” in Marchetti, Giancarlo, ed., The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty, 83–100 (New York: Routledge, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macauliffe, William, “How Did Abduction Get Confused with Inference to the Best Explanation?” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 51, no. 3 (2015): 300–19.Google Scholar
Makita, Etsuro, “What about Thrownness? The Genesis of Gadamer’s Notion of Dialogue,” in Wierciński, Andrzej, ed., Gadamer’s Hermeneutics and the Art of Conversation, 297–306 (Berlin: Lit Verlag, 2011).Google Scholar
Mander, William J., British Idealism: A History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Mathieu, “Oxford Realism: Knowledge and Perception,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 8, no. 3 (2000): 485–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Mathieu, “Le modèle interrogatif de l’enquête de Hintikka, la ‘logique des questions et réponses’ de Collingwood et le raisonnement par abduction,” Klesis, 39 (2018): 245–69.Google Scholar
Marion, Mathieu, “John Cook Wilson,” in Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2022): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wilson.Google Scholar
Martin, J. A., Jr., “Collingwood and Wittgenstein on the Task of Philosophy: An Interesting Convergence,” Philosophy Today, 25 (1981): 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Rex, Historical Explanation: Re-enactment and the Practical Inference (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Martin, Rex, “Editor’s Introduction,” in Collingwood, R. G., An Essay on Metaphysics, revised edition, ed. Martin, Rex, xv–xcv (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1940]).Google Scholar
Massimi, Michaela, “Perspectivism,” in Saatsi, Juha, ed., The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, 164–75 (London and New York: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Massimi, Michaela, Perspectival Realism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuinness, Brian, ed., Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents 1911–1951 (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Kenneth B., “Historicity as Methodology or Hermeneutics: Collingwood’s Influence on Skinner and Gadamer,” Journal of the Philosophy of History, 2 (2008): 138–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, “Cézanne’s Doubt,” in Johnson, Galen, ed., The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader, 59–75 (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1993a [1945]).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, “Indirect Language and the Voices of Silence,” in Johnson, Galen, ed., The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader, 76–120 (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1993b [1952]).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, “On the Phenomenology of Language,” trans. Richard C. McCleary, in Merleau-Ponty, Signs, 84–97 (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1998 [1964]).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Donald A. Landes (London: Routledge, 2012 [1945]).Google Scholar
Mink, Louis O., Mind, History, and Dialectic: The Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood (Bloomington, IN: Harper & Row, 1969).Google Scholar
Mink, Louis O., “Collingwood’s Historicism: A Dialectic of Process,” in Krausz, Michael, ed., Critical Essays on the Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood, 154–78 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl, “Review of Robert B. Westbrook, Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 4, no. 2 (2006): 279–83.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl (ed.), New Pragmatists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl, The American Pragmatists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Monk, Ray, Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius (London: Jonathan Cape, 1990).Google Scholar
Monk, Ray, Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude, 1872–1921 (New York: The Free Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Monk, Ray, “How the Untimely Death of R. G. Collingwood Changed the Course of Philosophy Forever,” Prospect Magazine (2019): www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/how-the-untimely-death-of-rg-collingwood-changed-the-course-of-philosophy-forever-gilbert-ryle-ray-monk-analytic-continental.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de, An Apology for Raymond Sebond, trans. M. A. Screech (London: Penguin Books, 1987).Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de An Apology for Raymond Sebond, trans. Ariew, R. and Grene, M. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2003).Google Scholar
Moore, George Edward, Selected Writings, ed., Baldwin, Thomas (New York: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, “Wittgenstein’s Hinge Certainty,” in Constantine Sandis and Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, eds., Extending Hinge Epistemology, 3–26 (London and New York: Anthem Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mras, Gabriele, and Schmitz, Michael, eds., Force, Content, and the Unity of the Proposition (New York: Routledge, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Douglas, The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam (London: Bloomsbury, 2017).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, Daybreak, trans. R. J. Hollingdale, eds. Clark, Maudemarie and Leiter, Brian (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, “The Philosopher: Reflections on the Struggle Between Art and Knowledge,” in Breazeale, Daniel, ed., Philosophy and Truth, 3–58 (Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 1999).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Gay Science, ed. Williams, Bernard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, Beyond Good and Evil, trans. Judith Norman, eds. Horstmann, Rolf-Peter and Norman, Judith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, trans. Adrian Del Caro, ed. Pippin, Robert (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Niiniluoto, Ilkka, Critical Scientific Realism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Onians, John, “Michael David Kighley Baxandall,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 166 (2010): 27–46.Google Scholar
Passmore, John, “The Idea of a History of Philosophy,” History and Theory, 5 (1965): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, James, “The Oxford Man,” in Boucher, David and Smith, Teresa, eds., R. G. Collingwood: An Autobiography and Other Writings, 213–46 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S., Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–6, eds. Hartshorne, Charles and Wiess, Paul (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1931–35).Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S., The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 1, 1867–1893 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S., The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 2, 1893–1913 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie, “‘But Isn’t the Same at Least the Same?’: Wittgenstein and the Question of Translatability,” in Gibson, John and Huemer, Wolfgang, eds., The Literary Wittgenstein, 34–54 (London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie, “Writing Philosophy as Poetry: Wittgenstein’s Literary Syntax,” in Munz, V., Puhl, K., and Wang, J., eds., Language and World Part Two: Signs, Minds and Actions, 277–96 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013).Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie, “The Conceptualist Turn: Wittgenstein and the New Writing,” English Language and Literature, 61, no. 4 (2015): 531–55.Google Scholar
Pólya, George, How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1945).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pólya, George, Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, 2 vols. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1954).Google Scholar
Popa, Elana, “Collingwood and Manipulability-Based Approaches to Causation: Methodological Issues,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 22, no. 1 (2016): 139–66.Google Scholar
Popa, Elana, “Collingwood, Pragmatism, and Philosophy of Science,” in Dharamsi, Karim, D’Oro, Giuseppina, and Leach, Stephen, eds., Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology, 131–49 (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, “The Poverty of Historicism, III,” Economica, 12 (1945): 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson, 1950 [1935]).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, The Open Society and Its Enemies, second edition (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1952).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, “La rationalité et le statut du principe de rationalité,” in Claassen, E. M., ed., Les fondements philosophiques des systèmes économiques, 142–50 (Paris: Payot, 1967).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, Objective Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Potts, Alex, “Michael Baxandall and the Shadows in Plato’s Cave,” Art History, 21, no. 4 (1998): 531–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman, “Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” Philosophical Review, 60, no. 1 (1951): 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reece, Richard, “The Badness of British Art Under the Romans,” unpublished manuscript (1977): www.academia.edu/21943787/The_Badness_of_British_art_under_the_Romans.Google Scholar
Reed, Terence J., Thomas Mann: The Uses of Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans, Experience and Prediction (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1938).Google Scholar
Renaud, François, Die Resokratisierung Platons: Die Platonische Hermeneutik Hans-Georg Gadamers (Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 1999).Google Scholar
Requate, Angela, “Was R. G. Collingwood an Undercover Pragmatist?” Diálogos, 66 (1995): 93–116.Google Scholar
Requate, Angela, “R. G. Collingwood’s Pragmatist Approach to Metaphysics,” International Studies in Philosophy, 29, no. 2 (1997): 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas, Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Réti, Richard, Modern Ideas in Chess (Milford: Russell Enterprises, 2009).Google Scholar
Retz, Tyson, “Why Re-enactment Is Not Empathy, Once and for All,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 11 (2017): 306–23.Google Scholar
Rhees, Rush, ed., Recollections of Wittgenstein (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Richmond, I. A., “Appreciation of R. G. Collingwood as an Archaeologist,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 29 (1943a): 478–79.Google Scholar
Richmond, I. A., “R. G. Collingwood: Bibliography of Writings on Ancient History and Archaeology,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 29 (1943b): 481–85.Google Scholar
Ridley, Aaron, “Not Ideal: Collingwood’s Expression Theory,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 55, no. 3 (1997): 263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, Aaron, R. G. Collingwood (London: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar
Roberston, Michael, “Nietzsche’s Poet-Philosopher: Toward a Poetics of Response-ability, Possibility, and the Future,” Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 45, no. 1 (2012): 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rödl, Sebastian, Self-Consciousness and Objectivity: An Introduction to Absolute Idealism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “The Contingency of Language,” in Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, 3–22 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “The Contingency of Selfhood,” in Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, 23–43 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “Pragmatism and Romanticism,” in Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers vol. 4, 105–19 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “Analytic and Conversational Philosophy,” in Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers vol. 4, 120–30 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “Wittgenstein and the Linguistic Turn,” in Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers vol. 4, 160–75 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “The Fire of Life,” Poetry, 191, no. 2 (2007d): 129–31.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, Philosophy as Poetry (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Sandra, “Contemporary Process Metaphysics and Diverse Intuitions of Time: Can the Gap Be Bridged?” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, new series, 12, no. 4 (1998): 271–88.Google Scholar
Rozema, David, “Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: A ‘poem’ by Ludwig Wittgenstein,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 63 (2002): 345–63.Google Scholar
Rubinoff, Lionel, “Collingwood and the Radical Conversion Hypothesis,” Dialogue, 5 (1966): 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinoff, Lionel, Collingwood and the Reform of Metaphysics (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruskin, John, The Stones of Venice (New York: Bryan Taylor & Co., 1894).Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, Philosophical Essays (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1910).Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, The Problems of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1912).Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, Mysticism and Logic (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1917).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, Logic and Knowledge: Essays, 1901–1950, ed. Marsh, Robert Charles (New York: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert, The Concept of Mind (London: Routledge, 2009 [1949]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saari, Heikki, Re-enactment: A Study in R. G. Collingwood’s Philosophy of History (Åbo: Åbo Akademi, 1984).Google Scholar
Saari, Heikki, “R. G. Collingwood on the Identity of Thoughts,” Dialogue, 28, no. 1 (1988): 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandis, Constantine, “Consider the Squirrel: Hume as Hinge Epistemologist,” in Sandis, Constantine and Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, eds., Extending Hinge Epistemology, 193–214 (London and New York: Anthem Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul, Being and Nothingness, trans. Sarah Richmond (London: Routledge, 2018 [1943]).Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul, L’existentialisme est un humanisme (Paris: Gallimard, 1996).Google Scholar
Saviano, Roberto, Gomorrah: Italy’s Other Mafia, trans. Virginia Jewiss (London: Pan Macmillan, 2007).Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, “Critical Fragments,” in Philosophical Fragments, trans. Peter Firchow (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Schulte, Joachim, “Wittgenstein on Philosophy as Poetry,” in Molder, F. M., Soeiro, D., and Fonseca, N., eds., Morphology: Questions on Method and Language, 347–69 (Bern: Peter Lang, 2013).Google Scholar
Sclafani, Richard, “Wollheim on Collingwood,” Philosophy 51 (1976): 353–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scriven, Michael, “Truisms as the Grounds for Historical Explanations,” in Gardiner, Patrick, ed., Theories of History, 443–75 (New York: Macmillan, 1959).Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid, “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind,” in Science, Perception, and Reality, 127–96 (London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963).Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy B., A Defence of Poetry (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1904).Google Scholar
Siefken, Hinrich, “Mann as Essayist,” in Robertson, Ritchie, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Mann, 213–25 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Skagestad, Peter, Exploring the Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood: From History and Method to Art and Politics (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, “The Rise of, Challenge to and Prospects for a Collingwoodian Approach to the History of Political Thought,” in Castiglione, David and Hampsher-Monk, Ian, eds., The History of Historical Thought in National Context, 175–88 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert, Introduction to Phenomenology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Stebbing, L. Susan, “The Method of Analysis in Metaphysics,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, new series, 33 (1932–33): 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stengel, Kathrin, “Ethics as Style: Wittgenstein’s Aesthetic Ethics and Ethical Aesthetics,” Poetics Today, 25, no. 4 (2004): 609–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Peter, The Social History of Roman Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Stout, George Frederick, “Immediacy, Mediacy, and Coherence,” Mind, new series, 17, no. 65 (1908): 20–47.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo, “On Collingwood’s Philosophy of History,” The Review of Metaphysics, 5 (1952): 559–86.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen, “Realistic Physicalism: Why Physicalism Entails Panpsychism,” in Freeman, Anthony, ed., Consciousness and Its Place in Nature: Does Physicalism Entail Panpsychism?, 3–31 (Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2006).Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F., “Imagination and Perception,” in Strawson, Freedom and Resentment, and Other Essays, 45–65 (London: Methuen, 1974).Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F., Skepticism and Naturalism (London: Methuen and Co., 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stueber, Karsten R., “The Psychological Basis of Historical Explanation: Reenactment, Simulation, and the Fusion of Horizons,” History and Theory, 41 (2002): 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Jeremy, “Michael Baxandall and the Sociological Interpretation of Art,” Cultural Sociology, 4, no. 2 (2010): 231–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Therborn, Goran, What Does the Ruling Class Do When It Rules? State Apparatuses and State Power under Feudalism, Capitalism and Socialism (London: Verso, 1978).Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo, What Is Art? and Essays on Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Toynbee, J. M. C., Art in Britain under the Romans (Oxford: Clarendon, 1964).Google Scholar
Travis, Charles, The True and the False: The Domain of the Pragmatic (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanheeswijck, Guido, “The Debilitating Effect of Logical Positivism: On the Difference Between R. G. Collingwood’s Essay on Philosophical Method and An Essay on Metaphysics,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 13, no. 2 (2007): 51–68.Google Scholar
Vardoulakis, Dimitrios, “The Vicissitude of Completeness: Gadamer’s Criticism of Collingwood,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 12 (2004): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vardoulakis, Dimitrios, “‘Clumsy Questioners’: Questioning and the Meaning of Meaning in Collingwood,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 11, no. 1 (2005): 39–59.Google Scholar
Wade, Ben, Dialectic of the Ladder: Wittgenstein, the Tractatus, and Modernism (London: Bloomsbury, 2015).Google Scholar
Waismann, Friedrich, “How I See Philosophy,” in Ayer, A. J., ed., Logical Positivism, 345–80 (New York: The Free Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Weijers, Olga, La “Disputatio” à la Faculté des Arts de Paris (1200–1350 environ) (Turnhout: Brepols, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weijers, Olga, In Search of the Truth: A History of Disputation Techniques from Antiquity to Early Modern Times (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westbrook, Robert, Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Wheeler, Mortimer, “The Paradox of Celtic Art,” Antiquity, 6 (1932): 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Mortimer, Still Digging (London: Michael Joseph, 1955).Google Scholar
White, Hayden, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred N., Modes of Thought (New York: The Free Press, 1968 [1938]).Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred N., Process and Reality, corrected edition, eds. Ray Griffin, David and Sherburne, Donald (New York: The Free Press, 1979 [1929]).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Richard, and Pickett, Kate, The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone (London: Penguin, 2010).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, Truth and Truthfulness (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Wiltsher, Nick, “Feeling, Emotion and Imagination: In Defence of Collingwood’s Expression Theory of Art,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 26, no. 4 (2018): 759–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm, Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft (Strassburg: Heitz & Mündel, 1894).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigation, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (New York: Macmillan, 1958).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, On Certainty (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Culture and Value, trans. Peter Winch, ed. Von Wright, G. H. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Zettel, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, eds. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Von Wright, G. H. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief, ed. Barrett, Cyril (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Ogden, C. K. (London: Routledge, 2000 [1922]).Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard, “On an Alleged Inconsistency in Collingwood’s Aesthetic,” in Krausz, Richard, ed., Critical Essays on the Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood, 68–78 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard, Art and Its Objects, second edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015 [1980]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, John, Errors of Reasoning: Naturalizing the Logic of Inference (London: College Publications, 2013).Google Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik, Explanation and Understanding (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor, The Culture Industry, ed. Bernstein, J. M. (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Allen, John Romilly, Celtic Art in Pagan and Pre-Christian Times (London: Methuen, 1904).Google Scholar
Alpers, Svetlana, and Baxandall, Michael, Tiepolo and the Pictorial Intelligence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Austin, John L., Sense and Sensibilia (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J., “Demonstration of the Impossibility of Metaphysics,” Mind, 43, no. 171 (1934): 335–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A. J., Logical Positivism (New York: The Free Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J., Part of My Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J., Language, Truth and Logic (London: Penguin Books, 1990 [1936]; second edn. Mineola, NY: Dover, 1952 [London: Gollancz, 1946]).Google Scholar
Barés-Gómez, Cristina, and Fontaine, Mathieu, “Argumentation and Abduction in Dialogical Logic,” in Magnani, Lorenzo and Bertolotti, Tommaso, eds., Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science, 295–314 (Dordrecht: Springer, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxandall, Michael, Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Baxandall, Michael, “The Language of Art History,” New Literary History, 10 (1979): 453–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxandall, Michael, Patterns of Intention: On the Historical Explanation of Pictures (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985a).Google Scholar
Baxandall, Michael, “Art, Society, and the Bouguer Principle,” Representations, 12 (1985b): 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxandall, Michael, “Substance, Sensation, and Perception: Michael Baxandall,” interviewer, Richard Cándida Smith, Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities (1998): https://archive.org/details/substancesensati00baxa/page/n21/mode/2up.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael, “Collingwood’s Conception of Presuppositional Analysis,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 11, no. 2 (2005): 41–114.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael, “Rex Martin’s Reading of Collingwood’s Essay on Metaphysics,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 12, no. 1 (2006): 83–102.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael, “Collingwood’s Critique of Oxbridge Realism,” in Boucher, David and Smith, Teresa, eds., R. G. Collingwood: An Autobiography and Other Writings, 247–70 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C., The Romantic Imperative: The Concept of Early German Romanticism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Bell, Clive, Civilization: An Essay (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1938).Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri, Creative Evolution, trans. Arthur Mitchell (Mineola, NY: Dover, 1907).Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri, The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. M. L. Andison (Mineola, NY: Dover, 1934).Google Scholar
Bertoldi, Eugene, “Gadamer’s Criticisms of Collingwood,” Idealistic Studies, 14 (1984): 213–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, Simon, “Re-enactment as Critique of Logical Analysis: Wittgensteinian Themes in Collingwood,” in Kogler, Hans H. and Stueber, Karsten, eds., Empathy and Agency: The Problem of Understanding in the Human Sciences, 270–87 (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon, Truth: A Guide (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Blagg, T. F. C., “Art and Architecture,” in Todd, Malcolm, ed., Research on Roman Britain, Britannia Monograph Series 11, 203–17 (Oxford: Oxbow, 1989).Google Scholar
Boucher, David, The Social and Political Thought of R. G. Collingwood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, David, and Smith, Teresa, eds., R. G. Collingwood: An Autobiography and Other Writings: With Essays on Collingwood’s Life and Work (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Delsaut, Yvette, “Pour une sociologie de la perception,” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 40 (1981): 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwsma, Oets K., Wittgenstein: Conversations 1949–1951, eds. Craft, J. L. and Hustwit, R. E. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1986).Google Scholar
Braaksma, Ymko, “‘The Babblings of Pragmatism’: Reconstructing R. G. Collingwood’s Rejection of F. C. S. Schiller’s Pragmatism in Speculum Mentis,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 27, no. 2 (2021): 241–66.Google Scholar
Braaksma, Ymko, “All Thought Exists for the Sake of Action: The Historical and Philosophical Relations between R. G. Collingwood and Classical Pragmatism,” PhD thesis (University of Groningen, 2022).Google Scholar
Bradley, Francis Herbert, Appearance and Reality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1897).Google Scholar
Bradley, Francis Herbert, Essays on Truth and Reality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1914).Google Scholar
Broadbent, Alex, Philosophy of Epidemiology (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Gary, Rethinking Collingwood: Philosophy, Politics and the Unity of Theory and Practice (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf, History and Eschatology (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Burns, Robert M., “Collingwood, Bradley, and Historical Knowledge,” History and Theory, 45, no. 2 (2006): 178–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Evan William, “From Plato to Socrates: Wittgenstein’s Journey on Collingwood’s Map,” AE: Canadian Aesthetics Journal, 10 (2004): 1–33.Google Scholar
Campos, Daniel G., “On the Distinction between Peirce’s Abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the Best Explanation,” Synthese, 180 (2011): 419–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolph, “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, no. 11 (1950): 20–40.Google Scholar
Cassin, Barbara, ed., Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cellucci, Carlo, Filosofia e Matematica (Bari: Laterza, 2002).Google Scholar
Cellucci, Carlo, Rethinking Logic: Logic in Relation to Mathematics, Evolution, and Method (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cellucci, Carlo, Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View (Cham: Springer, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cellucci, Carlo, The Making of Mathematics: Heuristic Philosophy of Mathematics (Cham: Springer, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravartty, Anjan, Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, David, “Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, no. 3 (1995): 200–19.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David, The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok, “Pragmatism, Perspectivism, and the Historicity of Science,” in Massimi, Michaela and McCoy, Casey, eds., Understanding Perspectivism: Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects, 10–27 (London: Routledge, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Hasok, Realism for Realistic People: A New Pragmatist Philosophy of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claeys, Gregory, Marx and Marxism (London: Penguin, 2018).Google Scholar
Cogburn, Jon, “Collingwood Paradoxicality and Reverse Collingwood Paradoxicality,” New APPS (2013): www.newappsblog.com/2013/07/collingwood-paradoxicality-and-reverse-collingwood-paradoxicality.html.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel T., “Biographia Literaria,” in Jackson, H. J., ed., Samuel Taylor Coleridge: The Major Works, 155–482 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985 [1817]).Google Scholar
Coliva, Annalisa, “Which Hinge Epistemology between Animal, Biscopic and Constitutivist?” in Sandis, Constantine and Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, eds., Extending Hinge Epistemology, 51–70 (London: Anthem Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., Religion and Philosophy (London: Macmillan and Co., 1916).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “The Purpose of the Roman Wall,” The Vasculum: The North Country Quarterly of Science and Local History, 8, no. 1 (1921): 4–9.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Sensation and Thought,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 24 (1923–24): 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., Speculum Mentis, or The Map of Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Aesthetic,” in McDowall, R. J. S., ed., The Mind: A Series of Lectures Delivered in King’s College, London, During the Lent Term, 1927, 214–44 (London: Longmans Green, 1927a).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Oswald Spengler and the Theory of Historical Cycles,” Antiquity, 1 (1927b): 311–25.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Review of Mikhail Rostovtzeff, The Social and Economic History of the Roman Empire,” Antiquity, 1 (1927c): 367–69.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Roman Signal-Stations on the Cumberland Coast,” Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society, 29 (1929a): 138–65.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Town and Country in Roman Britain,” Antiquity, 3 (1929b): 261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Roman-Celtic Art in Northumbria,” Archaeologia, 80 (1930): 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Hadrian’s Wall: 1921–1930,” Journal of Roman Studies, 21 (1931a): 36–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Review of C. J. Ducasse, The Philosophy of Art,” Philosophy, 6, no. 23 (1931b): 383–86.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., The Principles of Art (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1938).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., An Autobiography (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., The Idea of Nature (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1945).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., Denken, trans. Hans-Georg Gadamer (Stuttgart: Koehler, 1955a).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., Philosophie der Geschichte, trans. Gertrud Herding (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1955b).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., Essays in the Philosophy of History, ed. Debbins, William (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., The New Leviathan, or, Man, Civilization and Barbarism, revised edition, ed. Boucher, David (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992 [1942]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Goodness, Rightness, Utility,” in Boucher, David, ed., The New Leviathan, or, Man, Civilization and Barbarism, revised edition, 391–479 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992 [1942]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., The Idea of History, revised edition, ed. van der Dussen, Jan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993 [1946]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., An Essay on Metaphysics, revised edition, ed. Martin, Rex (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1940]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “The Nature of Metaphysical Study,” in Collingwood, An Essay on Metaphysics, ed. Martin, Rex, 356–78 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1934]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Function of Metaphysics in Civilization,” in Collingwood, An Essay on Metaphysics, ed. Martin, Rex, 379–421 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1938]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Notes for an Essay on Logic,” in Collingwood, An Essay on Metaphysics, ed. Martin, Rex, 422–28 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1939]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., The Principles of History, and Other Writings in the Philosophy of History, eds. Dray, William and van der Dussen, Jan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., An Essay on Philosophical Method, revised edition, eds. Connelly, James and D’Oro, Giuseppina (Oxford: University Press, 2005 [1933]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “The Correspondence between R. G. Collingwood and Gilbert Ryle,” in Collingwood, An Essay on Philosophical Method, eds. Connelly, James and D’Oro, Giuseppina, 253–326 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 [1935]).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., “Libellus de Generatione: An Essay in Absolute Empiricism,” La Cultura, 57, no. 3 (2019 [1920]): 423–70.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., and Myres, John N. L., Roman Britain and the English Settlements (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936).Google Scholar
Collingwood, W. G., “Remains of the Pre-Norman Period,” in Wilson, James, ed., The Victoria History of the County of Cumberland, volume 1, 253–93 (London: Archibald Constable, 1901).Google Scholar
Collins, David, “Expression, Creation, and Discovery: Toward a Synthesized Processual Account of Art and Its Cognitive, Moral, and Social Value,” PhD thesis (McGill University, 2021).Google Scholar
Collins, David, “Articulating the Visible: Collingwood and Merleau-Ponty on Expression in Painting,” in Brassey, Vanessa and Matravers, Derek, eds., The Expression of Emotion in the Visual Arts, 105–26 (London: Routledge, 2024).Google Scholar
Conan Doyle, Arthur, The Complete Sherlock Holmes (Garden City: Doubleday & Co., 1970).Google Scholar
Condillac, Abbé de, Traité des Sensations, in Philosophical Writings of Etienne Bonnot, Abbé de Condillac, trans. Franklin Philip (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1982 [1754]).Google Scholar
Connelly, James, “Collingwood Controversies,” in Boucher, David and Smith, Teresa, eds., R. G. Collingwood: An Autobiography and Other Writings, 399–425 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Connelly, James, and Gadamer, Hans-Georg, “An Autobiography in Germany and Romania,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 13, no. 1 (2007): 5–26.Google Scholar
Connelly, James, Peter, Johnson, and Stephen, Leach, R. G. Collingwood: A Research Companion (London: Bloomsbury, 2009).Google Scholar
Cook Wilson, John, Statement and Inference, 2 volumes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1926).Google Scholar
Couse, G. S., “Collingwood’s Detective Image of the Historian and the Study of Hadrian’s Wall,” History and Theory, 29, no. 4 (1990): 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Malcolm, The Life and Work of W. G. Collingwood: A Wayward Compass in Lakeland (Oxford: Archaeopress, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croce, Benedetto, What Is Living and What Is Dead of the Philosophy of Hegel, trans. Douglas Ainslie (London: Macmillan, 1915).Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto, Logica come scienza del concetto puro (Bari: Laterza, 1981).Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto, Aesthetic: As Science of Expression and General Linguistic, revised edition, trans. Douglas Ainslie (London: Transaction Publishers, 1995 [1902]).Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C., Analytical Philosophy of History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Davies, David, “Collingwood’s ‘Performance’ Theory of Art,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 48, no. 2 (2008a): 162–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, David, “How Photographs ‘Signify’ the World,” in Walden, Scott, ed., Photography and Philosophy, 167–86 (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008b).Google Scholar
Davies, David, “Medium,” in Gracyk, Theodore and Kania, Andrew, eds., Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Music, 48–58 (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Davis, Whitney, “Art History, Re-enactment, and the Idiographic Stance,” in Mack, Peter and Williams, Robert, eds., Michael Baxandall: Vision and the Work of Words, 69–89 (Farnham: Ashgate, 2015).Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, Difference and Repetition, trans. Paul Patton (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995 [1968]).Google Scholar
D’Epiro, Peter, “Whose Vanity Must Be Pulled Down?” Paideuma: Modern and Contemporary Poetry and Poetics, 13, no. 2 (1984): 247–52.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass (London: Routledge, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deVries, Willem, “Getting Beyond Idealism,” in deVries, Willem, ed., Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars, 211–45 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John, Logic: The Theory of Inquiry (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1938).Google Scholar
Dewey, John, Experience and Nature (New York: Dover, 1958 [1925]).Google Scholar
Dharamsi, Karim, D’Oro, Giuseppina, and Leach, Stephen, eds., Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm, Die geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens. Gesammelte Schriften, Band 5 (Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1924).Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm, The Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences: Selected Works, Volume III (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Dilworth, John, “Is Ridley Charitable to Collingwood?” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56, no. 4 (1998): 393–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donagan, Allan, The Later Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1985).Google Scholar
D’Oro, Giuseppina, “Collingwood on Re-enactment and the Identity of Thought,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 38, no. 1 (2000): 84–101.Google ScholarPubMed
D’Oro, Giuseppina, Collingwood and the Metaphysics of Experience (London: Routledge, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Oro, Giuseppina, “The Touch of King Midas: Collingwood on Why Actions Are Not Events,” Philosophical Explorations, 21, no. 1 (2018): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Oro, Giuseppina, “Unlikely Bedfellows? Collingwood, Carnap and the Internal/External Distinction,” in Stern, Robert, ed., Idealism and Pragmatism: Traditions in Dialogue, 202–17 (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
D’Oro, Giuseppina, “Why the Attempt to Bury Metaphysics Failed,” iai News: An Online Magazine of Big Ideas (2022): https://iai.tv/articles/why-the-attempt-to-bury-metaphysics-failed-auid-2277.Google Scholar
D’Oro, Giuseppina, Why Collingwood Matters: A Defence of Humanistic Understanding (London: Bloomsbury, 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Oro, Giuseppina, and Connelly, James, “Robin George Collingwood,” in Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2020): https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/collingwood.Google Scholar
Dray, William H., Laws and Explanation in History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Dray, William H., ed., Philosophical Analysis and History (New York: Harper & Row, 1966).Google Scholar
Drury, Maurice O’C., “Conversations with Wittgenstein,” in Rhees, Rush, ed., Recollections of Wittgenstein, 97–171 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Dufrenne, Mikel, The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience, trans. Casey, Edward S. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
van der Dussen, Jan, “Collingwood’s Claim that History Is a Science,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 13, no. 2 (2007): 5–30.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Garssen, Bart, Greco, Sara, van Haaften, Ton, Labrie, Nanon, Leal, Fernando, and Peng, Wu, Argumentative Style: A Pragma-Dialectical Study of Functional Variety in Argumentative Discourse (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Garssen, Bart, Eric Krabbe, A. Snoeck Henkemans, Fransisca, Vertheij, Bart, and Wagemans, Jean, Handbook of Argumentation Theory (Cham: Springer, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, A. P. “R. G. Collingwood and the Hermeneutical Tradition,” International Studies in Philosophy 23 (1991): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul, Against Method (London: Verso, 1993 [1975]).Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob, “Der Gedanke: Eine logische Untersuchung,” Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, 2 (1918): 58–77.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar
Gabbay, Dov, and Woods, John, The Reach of Abduction: Insight and Trial (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005).Google Scholar
Gabbay, Dov, and Woods, John, “Advice on Abductive Logic,” Logic Journal of the IGPL, 14, no. 2 (2006): 189–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, “Einleitung,” in Collingwood, R. G., Denken, v–xiv (Stuttgart: Koehler, 1995).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Philosophical Hermeneutics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Platos dialektische Ethik, second edition (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1983).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, The Idea of the Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, “The Problem of Historical Consciousness,” in Rabinow, Paul and Sullivan, William M., eds., Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look, 82–140 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method (New York: Continuum, 1989).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Plato’s Dialectical Ethics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, “Introduction to Denken, the German Translation of An Autobiography,” The Collingwood Journal, spring issue (1992): 9–14.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Gesammelte Werke, 10 volumes (Tübingen: J. C. B. Möhr, 1985–95).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, “What Is Truth?” in Wachterhauser, Brice, ed., Hermeneutics and Truth, 33–46 (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, L’herméneutique en perspective, Ire et IIe parties (Paris: Vrin, 2005).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Hermeneutics between History and Philosophy: The Selected Writings of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Volume 1 (London: Bloomsbury, 2016).Google Scholar
Gardiner, Patrick, ed., Theories of History (New York: The Free Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Gardiner, Patrick, The Philosophy of History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald, Scientific Perspectivism (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, Philip, Consciousness and Fundamental Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Daniel, “The Implications of Fundamental Cause Theory for Priority Setting,” American Journal of Public Health, 104, no. 10 (2014): 1839–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, Daniel, “Fundamental Cause Theory,” in Venkatapuram, Sridhar and Broadbent, Alex, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Public Health, 85–97 (Oxford: Taylor & Francis, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, second edition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Francisco, Plato and Heidegger: A Question of Dialogue (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Grant, John, “On Reading Collingwood’s Principles of Art,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 46, no. 2 (1987): 239–48.Google Scholar
Grondin, Jean, Hans-Georg Gadamer: A Biography (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul, “Re-enactment, Reconstruction and the Freedom of the Imagination: Collingwood on History and Art,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 26, no. 4 (2018): 738–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Knowledge and Human Interests, second edition (New York: Beacon Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Haddock, Bruce, “The Historicity of Thought,” in Boucher, David and Smith, Teresa, eds., R. G. Collingwood: An Autobiography and Other Writings, 335–52. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Hanson, Norwood Russell, Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert, “The Inference to the Best Explanation,” Philosophical Review, 74 (1965): 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alexandra, Romantic Moderns (London: Thames & Hudson, 2010).Google Scholar
Haverfield, Francis J., The Romanization of Roman Britain, second edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1912).Google Scholar
Haverfield, Francis J. The Roman Occupation of Britain, revised by George MacDonald (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924).Google Scholar
Heil, John, Appearance in Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl, “The Function of General Laws in History,” Journal of Philosophy 39 (1942): 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henig, Martin, The Art of Roman Britain (London: Batsford, 1995).Google Scholar
Hermann, Hilde, “Philosophie zwischen Hegel und Heidegger: Zu Hans-Georg Gadamers Kölner Vortrag über ‘Europäische Historismus’,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 47, no. 25 (1952): 4.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko, Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery (Dordrecht: Springer, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko, and Hintikka, Merrill B., “Sherlock Holmes Confronts Modern Logic: Towards a Theory of Information-Seeking through Questioning,” in Barth, E. M. and Martens, J. L., eds., Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation, 55–76 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko, and Remes, Unto, The Method of Analysis: Its Geometrical Origin and Its General Significance (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Macpherson, C. B. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985 [1651]).Google Scholar
Hogan, John P., “Hermeneutics and the Logic of Question and Answer: Collingwood and Gadamer,” Heythrop Journal 28 (1987): 263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, John P., Collingwood and Theological Hermeneutics (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1989).Google Scholar
Holly, Michael Ann, “Patterns in the Shadows: Attention in/to the Writings of Michael Baxandall,” in Adrian Rifkin, About Michael Baxandall, 5–16 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999).Google Scholar
Hospers, John, “The Concept of Artistic Expression,” Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society, new series, 55 (1954–55): 313–44.Google Scholar
Hospers, John, “The Croce-Collingwood Theory of Art,” Philosophy, 31 (1956): 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978 [1888]).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, “Philosophy as Rigorous Science,” in Lauer, Quentin, ed., Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, 71–147. (New York: Harper, 1965 [1910]).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Logical Investigations, volume 1, trans. J. N. Findlay (London: Routledge, 1970 [1900]).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time, trans. John Barnett Brough (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001).Google Scholar
Hylton, Peter, Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglis, Fred, History Man: The Life of R. G. Collingwood (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, James R., Robert Boyle and the English Revolution: A Study in Social and Intellectual Change (New York: Franklin, 1977).Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret C., The Newtonians and the English Revolution: 1689–1720 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William, “A World of Pure Experience,” The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 1, no. 21 (1904): 561–70.Google Scholar
James, William, Essays in Radical Empiricism, eds. Bowers, Fredson and Skrupskelis, Ignas (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976 [1912]).Google Scholar
James, William, A Pluralistic Universe, in Kuklick, Bruce, ed., William James: Writings 1902–1910, 625–819 (New York: Library of America, 1987 [1909]).Google Scholar
Janik, Allan, “The Dichtung of Analytic Philosophy: Wittgenstein’s Legacy from Frege and Its Consequences,” in Bengtsson, G., Säätelä, S., and Pichler, A., eds., New Essays on Frege: Between Science and Literature, 143–57 (Cham: Springer, 2018).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen, The Establishment: And How They Get Away with It (London: Allen Lane, 2014).Google Scholar
Jope, E. M., Early Celtic Art in the British Isles (Oxford: Clarendon, 2000).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch,” in Reiss, Hans, ed., Kant: Political Writings, second edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 [1795]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of the Power of Judgment, ed. Guyer, Paul (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [1790]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanterian, Edward, “Philosophy as Poetry? Reflections on Wittgenstein’s Style,” Wittgenstein Studien, 3, no. 1 (2012): 95–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Thomas D., “British Hanging Bowls,” Antiquity, 6, no. 22 (1932): 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimhi, Irad, Thinking and Being (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Kindi, Vasso, “Collingwood, Wittgenstein, Strawson: Philosophy and Description,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 22, no. 1 (2016): 19–43.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, Science in a Democratic Society (New York: Prometheus, 2011a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, The Ethical Project (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, Preludes to Pragmatism: Toward a Reconstruction of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, Deaths in Venice: The Cases of Gustav Von Aschenbach (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Klagge, James, Wittgenstein’s Artillery: Philosophy as Poetry (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, Chinatsu, and Marion, Mathieu, “Gadamer and Collingwood on Temporal Distance and Understanding,” History and Theory, 50 (2011): 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, Chinatsu, and Marion, Mathieu, “The Later Collingwood on Method: Re-enactment and Abduction,” in Dharamsi, Karim, D’Oro, Giuseppina, and Leach, Stephen, eds., Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology, 229–48 (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2017).Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Chinatsu, and Marion, Mathieu, “Collingwood as an Archaeologist and the Gabbay-Woods Schema for Abductive Reasoning,” in Gabbay, Dov, Magnani, Lorenzo, Park, Woosuk, and Pietarinen, Ahti-Veiko, eds., Natural Arguments: A Tribute to John Woods, 481–96 (London: College Publications, 2019).Google Scholar
Knox, T. M., “Preface,” in Collingwood, R. G., The Idea of History, v–xxiv (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1946).Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul, “History and Idealism: The Theory of R. G. Collingwood,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 23, no. 1 (2017): 9–29.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012 [1962]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuusela, Oskari, “Wittgenstein, Nietzsche, and Future Philosophers: The Notion of Truth in Philosophy,” in Zambito, Pascal and Takagi, Shunichi, eds., Wittgenstein and Nietzsche (New York: Routledge, 2024).Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre, “Proofs and Refutations,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 14, no. 53 (1963): 1–25; no. 54, 120–39; no. 55, 221–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre, Philosophical Papers, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Landes, Donald A., Merleau-Ponty and the Paradoxes of Expression (London: Bloomsbury, 2013).Google Scholar
Landes, Donald A., “Merleau-Ponty: A Bergsonian in the Making,” in Sinclair, Mark and Whistler, Dan, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Modern French Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024).Google Scholar
Langdale, Alan, “Interview with Michael Baxandall, February 3rd, 1994,” Journal of Art Historiography, 1 (2009): 1–31.Google Scholar
Lawn, Brian, The Rise and Decline of the Scholastic “Quaestio Disputata”: With Special Emphasis on Its Use in the Teaching of Medicine and Science (Leiden: Brill, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, Fernando, “On Philosophical Argumentation: Towards a Pragma-Dialectical Solution to a Puzzle,” Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8, no. 2 (2019): 173–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, Fernando, “On the Importance of Questioning within the Ideal Model of Critical Discussion,” Argumentation, 34, no. 4 (2020): 405–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, Fernando, “On Questions in Standard Pragma-Dialectics,” Quadripartita Ratio, 6, no. 11 (2021): 41–54.Google Scholar
Leal, Fernando, and Marraud, Hubert, How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell–Copleston Debate (Cham: Springer, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, E. T., Celtic Ornament in the British Isles (London: Clarendon Press, 1933).Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine, and Hookway, Christopher, “Pragmatism,” in Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2021): https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/pragmatism.Google Scholar
Lepenies, Wolf, Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology, trans. R. J. Hollingdale (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Levine, Joseph M., “The Autonomy of History: R. G. Collingwood and Agatha Christie,” Clio, 7, no. 2 (1978): 253–64.Google Scholar
Link, Bruce, and Phelan, Jo, “Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Disease,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, extra issue (1995): 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovibond, Sabina, “‘Ethical Living’ in the Media and in Philosophy,” in Lovibond, Essays on Ethics and Feminism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovibond, Sabina, “Philosophy, Literature, Politics: The Cases of Rorty and Collingwood,” in Marchetti, Giancarlo, ed., The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty, 83–100 (New York: Routledge, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macauliffe, William, “How Did Abduction Get Confused with Inference to the Best Explanation?” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 51, no. 3 (2015): 300–19.Google Scholar
Makita, Etsuro, “What about Thrownness? The Genesis of Gadamer’s Notion of Dialogue,” in Wierciński, Andrzej, ed., Gadamer’s Hermeneutics and the Art of Conversation, 297–306 (Berlin: Lit Verlag, 2011).Google Scholar
Mander, William J., British Idealism: A History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Mathieu, “Oxford Realism: Knowledge and Perception,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 8, no. 3 (2000): 485–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Mathieu, “Le modèle interrogatif de l’enquête de Hintikka, la ‘logique des questions et réponses’ de Collingwood et le raisonnement par abduction,” Klesis, 39 (2018): 245–69.Google Scholar
Marion, Mathieu, “John Cook Wilson,” in Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2022): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wilson.Google Scholar
Martin, J. A., Jr., “Collingwood and Wittgenstein on the Task of Philosophy: An Interesting Convergence,” Philosophy Today, 25 (1981): 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Rex, Historical Explanation: Re-enactment and the Practical Inference (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Martin, Rex, “Editor’s Introduction,” in Collingwood, R. G., An Essay on Metaphysics, revised edition, ed. Martin, Rex, xv–xcv (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1940]).Google Scholar
Massimi, Michaela, “Perspectivism,” in Saatsi, Juha, ed., The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, 164–75 (London and New York: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Massimi, Michaela, Perspectival Realism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuinness, Brian, ed., Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents 1911–1951 (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Kenneth B., “Historicity as Methodology or Hermeneutics: Collingwood’s Influence on Skinner and Gadamer,” Journal of the Philosophy of History, 2 (2008): 138–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, “Cézanne’s Doubt,” in Johnson, Galen, ed., The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader, 59–75 (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1993a [1945]).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, “Indirect Language and the Voices of Silence,” in Johnson, Galen, ed., The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader, 76–120 (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1993b [1952]).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, “On the Phenomenology of Language,” trans. Richard C. McCleary, in Merleau-Ponty, Signs, 84–97 (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1998 [1964]).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Donald A. Landes (London: Routledge, 2012 [1945]).Google Scholar
Mink, Louis O., Mind, History, and Dialectic: The Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood (Bloomington, IN: Harper & Row, 1969).Google Scholar
Mink, Louis O., “Collingwood’s Historicism: A Dialectic of Process,” in Krausz, Michael, ed., Critical Essays on the Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood, 154–78 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl, “Review of Robert B. Westbrook, Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 4, no. 2 (2006): 279–83.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl (ed.), New Pragmatists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl, The American Pragmatists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Monk, Ray, Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius (London: Jonathan Cape, 1990).Google Scholar
Monk, Ray, Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude, 1872–1921 (New York: The Free Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Monk, Ray, “How the Untimely Death of R. G. Collingwood Changed the Course of Philosophy Forever,” Prospect Magazine (2019): www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/how-the-untimely-death-of-rg-collingwood-changed-the-course-of-philosophy-forever-gilbert-ryle-ray-monk-analytic-continental.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de, An Apology for Raymond Sebond, trans. M. A. Screech (London: Penguin Books, 1987).Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de An Apology for Raymond Sebond, trans. Ariew, R. and Grene, M. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2003).Google Scholar
Moore, George Edward, Selected Writings, ed., Baldwin, Thomas (New York: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, “Wittgenstein’s Hinge Certainty,” in Constantine Sandis and Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, eds., Extending Hinge Epistemology, 3–26 (London and New York: Anthem Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mras, Gabriele, and Schmitz, Michael, eds., Force, Content, and the Unity of the Proposition (New York: Routledge, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Douglas, The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam (London: Bloomsbury, 2017).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, Daybreak, trans. R. J. Hollingdale, eds. Clark, Maudemarie and Leiter, Brian (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, “The Philosopher: Reflections on the Struggle Between Art and Knowledge,” in Breazeale, Daniel, ed., Philosophy and Truth, 3–58 (Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 1999).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Gay Science, ed. Williams, Bernard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, Beyond Good and Evil, trans. Judith Norman, eds. Horstmann, Rolf-Peter and Norman, Judith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, trans. Adrian Del Caro, ed. Pippin, Robert (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Niiniluoto, Ilkka, Critical Scientific Realism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Onians, John, “Michael David Kighley Baxandall,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 166 (2010): 27–46.Google Scholar
Passmore, John, “The Idea of a History of Philosophy,” History and Theory, 5 (1965): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, James, “The Oxford Man,” in Boucher, David and Smith, Teresa, eds., R. G. Collingwood: An Autobiography and Other Writings, 213–46 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S., Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–6, eds. Hartshorne, Charles and Wiess, Paul (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1931–35).Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S., The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 1, 1867–1893 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S., The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 2, 1893–1913 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie, “‘But Isn’t the Same at Least the Same?’: Wittgenstein and the Question of Translatability,” in Gibson, John and Huemer, Wolfgang, eds., The Literary Wittgenstein, 34–54 (London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie, “Writing Philosophy as Poetry: Wittgenstein’s Literary Syntax,” in Munz, V., Puhl, K., and Wang, J., eds., Language and World Part Two: Signs, Minds and Actions, 277–96 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013).Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie, “The Conceptualist Turn: Wittgenstein and the New Writing,” English Language and Literature, 61, no. 4 (2015): 531–55.Google Scholar
Pólya, George, How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1945).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pólya, George, Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, 2 vols. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1954).Google Scholar
Popa, Elana, “Collingwood and Manipulability-Based Approaches to Causation: Methodological Issues,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 22, no. 1 (2016): 139–66.Google Scholar
Popa, Elana, “Collingwood, Pragmatism, and Philosophy of Science,” in Dharamsi, Karim, D’Oro, Giuseppina, and Leach, Stephen, eds., Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology, 131–49 (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, “The Poverty of Historicism, III,” Economica, 12 (1945): 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson, 1950 [1935]).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, The Open Society and Its Enemies, second edition (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1952).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, “La rationalité et le statut du principe de rationalité,” in Claassen, E. M., ed., Les fondements philosophiques des systèmes économiques, 142–50 (Paris: Payot, 1967).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, Objective Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Potts, Alex, “Michael Baxandall and the Shadows in Plato’s Cave,” Art History, 21, no. 4 (1998): 531–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman, “Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” Philosophical Review, 60, no. 1 (1951): 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reece, Richard, “The Badness of British Art Under the Romans,” unpublished manuscript (1977): www.academia.edu/21943787/The_Badness_of_British_art_under_the_Romans.Google Scholar
Reed, Terence J., Thomas Mann: The Uses of Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans, Experience and Prediction (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1938).Google Scholar
Renaud, François, Die Resokratisierung Platons: Die Platonische Hermeneutik Hans-Georg Gadamers (Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 1999).Google Scholar
Requate, Angela, “Was R. G. Collingwood an Undercover Pragmatist?” Diálogos, 66 (1995): 93–116.Google Scholar
Requate, Angela, “R. G. Collingwood’s Pragmatist Approach to Metaphysics,” International Studies in Philosophy, 29, no. 2 (1997): 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas, Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Réti, Richard, Modern Ideas in Chess (Milford: Russell Enterprises, 2009).Google Scholar
Retz, Tyson, “Why Re-enactment Is Not Empathy, Once and for All,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 11 (2017): 306–23.Google Scholar
Rhees, Rush, ed., Recollections of Wittgenstein (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Richmond, I. A., “Appreciation of R. G. Collingwood as an Archaeologist,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 29 (1943a): 478–79.Google Scholar
Richmond, I. A., “R. G. Collingwood: Bibliography of Writings on Ancient History and Archaeology,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 29 (1943b): 481–85.Google Scholar
Ridley, Aaron, “Not Ideal: Collingwood’s Expression Theory,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 55, no. 3 (1997): 263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, Aaron, R. G. Collingwood (London: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar
Roberston, Michael, “Nietzsche’s Poet-Philosopher: Toward a Poetics of Response-ability, Possibility, and the Future,” Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 45, no. 1 (2012): 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rödl, Sebastian, Self-Consciousness and Objectivity: An Introduction to Absolute Idealism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “The Contingency of Language,” in Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, 3–22 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “The Contingency of Selfhood,” in Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, 23–43 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “Pragmatism and Romanticism,” in Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers vol. 4, 105–19 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “Analytic and Conversational Philosophy,” in Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers vol. 4, 120–30 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “Wittgenstein and the Linguistic Turn,” in Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers vol. 4, 160–75 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “The Fire of Life,” Poetry, 191, no. 2 (2007d): 129–31.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, Philosophy as Poetry (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Sandra, “Contemporary Process Metaphysics and Diverse Intuitions of Time: Can the Gap Be Bridged?” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, new series, 12, no. 4 (1998): 271–88.Google Scholar
Rozema, David, “Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: A ‘poem’ by Ludwig Wittgenstein,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 63 (2002): 345–63.Google Scholar
Rubinoff, Lionel, “Collingwood and the Radical Conversion Hypothesis,” Dialogue, 5 (1966): 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinoff, Lionel, Collingwood and the Reform of Metaphysics (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruskin, John, The Stones of Venice (New York: Bryan Taylor & Co., 1894).Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, Philosophical Essays (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1910).Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, The Problems of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1912).Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, Mysticism and Logic (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1917).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, Logic and Knowledge: Essays, 1901–1950, ed. Marsh, Robert Charles (New York: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert, The Concept of Mind (London: Routledge, 2009 [1949]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saari, Heikki, Re-enactment: A Study in R. G. Collingwood’s Philosophy of History (Åbo: Åbo Akademi, 1984).Google Scholar
Saari, Heikki, “R. G. Collingwood on the Identity of Thoughts,” Dialogue, 28, no. 1 (1988): 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandis, Constantine, “Consider the Squirrel: Hume as Hinge Epistemologist,” in Sandis, Constantine and Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, eds., Extending Hinge Epistemology, 193–214 (London and New York: Anthem Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul, Being and Nothingness, trans. Sarah Richmond (London: Routledge, 2018 [1943]).Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul, L’existentialisme est un humanisme (Paris: Gallimard, 1996).Google Scholar
Saviano, Roberto, Gomorrah: Italy’s Other Mafia, trans. Virginia Jewiss (London: Pan Macmillan, 2007).Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, “Critical Fragments,” in Philosophical Fragments, trans. Peter Firchow (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Schulte, Joachim, “Wittgenstein on Philosophy as Poetry,” in Molder, F. M., Soeiro, D., and Fonseca, N., eds., Morphology: Questions on Method and Language, 347–69 (Bern: Peter Lang, 2013).Google Scholar
Sclafani, Richard, “Wollheim on Collingwood,” Philosophy 51 (1976): 353–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scriven, Michael, “Truisms as the Grounds for Historical Explanations,” in Gardiner, Patrick, ed., Theories of History, 443–75 (New York: Macmillan, 1959).Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid, “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind,” in Science, Perception, and Reality, 127–96 (London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963).Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy B., A Defence of Poetry (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1904).Google Scholar
Siefken, Hinrich, “Mann as Essayist,” in Robertson, Ritchie, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Mann, 213–25 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Skagestad, Peter, Exploring the Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood: From History and Method to Art and Politics (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, “The Rise of, Challenge to and Prospects for a Collingwoodian Approach to the History of Political Thought,” in Castiglione, David and Hampsher-Monk, Ian, eds., The History of Historical Thought in National Context, 175–88 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert, Introduction to Phenomenology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Stebbing, L. Susan, “The Method of Analysis in Metaphysics,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, new series, 33 (1932–33): 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stengel, Kathrin, “Ethics as Style: Wittgenstein’s Aesthetic Ethics and Ethical Aesthetics,” Poetics Today, 25, no. 4 (2004): 609–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Peter, The Social History of Roman Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Stout, George Frederick, “Immediacy, Mediacy, and Coherence,” Mind, new series, 17, no. 65 (1908): 20–47.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo, “On Collingwood’s Philosophy of History,” The Review of Metaphysics, 5 (1952): 559–86.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen, “Realistic Physicalism: Why Physicalism Entails Panpsychism,” in Freeman, Anthony, ed., Consciousness and Its Place in Nature: Does Physicalism Entail Panpsychism?, 3–31 (Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2006).Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F., “Imagination and Perception,” in Strawson, Freedom and Resentment, and Other Essays, 45–65 (London: Methuen, 1974).Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F., Skepticism and Naturalism (London: Methuen and Co., 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stueber, Karsten R., “The Psychological Basis of Historical Explanation: Reenactment, Simulation, and the Fusion of Horizons,” History and Theory, 41 (2002): 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Jeremy, “Michael Baxandall and the Sociological Interpretation of Art,” Cultural Sociology, 4, no. 2 (2010): 231–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Therborn, Goran, What Does the Ruling Class Do When It Rules? State Apparatuses and State Power under Feudalism, Capitalism and Socialism (London: Verso, 1978).Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo, What Is Art? and Essays on Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Toynbee, J. M. C., Art in Britain under the Romans (Oxford: Clarendon, 1964).Google Scholar
Travis, Charles, The True and the False: The Domain of the Pragmatic (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanheeswijck, Guido, “The Debilitating Effect of Logical Positivism: On the Difference Between R. G. Collingwood’s Essay on Philosophical Method and An Essay on Metaphysics,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 13, no. 2 (2007): 51–68.Google Scholar
Vardoulakis, Dimitrios, “The Vicissitude of Completeness: Gadamer’s Criticism of Collingwood,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 12 (2004): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vardoulakis, Dimitrios, “‘Clumsy Questioners’: Questioning and the Meaning of Meaning in Collingwood,” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 11, no. 1 (2005): 39–59.Google Scholar
Wade, Ben, Dialectic of the Ladder: Wittgenstein, the Tractatus, and Modernism (London: Bloomsbury, 2015).Google Scholar
Waismann, Friedrich, “How I See Philosophy,” in Ayer, A. J., ed., Logical Positivism, 345–80 (New York: The Free Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Weijers, Olga, La “Disputatio” à la Faculté des Arts de Paris (1200–1350 environ) (Turnhout: Brepols, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weijers, Olga, In Search of the Truth: A History of Disputation Techniques from Antiquity to Early Modern Times (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westbrook, Robert, Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Wheeler, Mortimer, “The Paradox of Celtic Art,” Antiquity, 6 (1932): 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Mortimer, Still Digging (London: Michael Joseph, 1955).Google Scholar
White, Hayden, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred N., Modes of Thought (New York: The Free Press, 1968 [1938]).Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred N., Process and Reality, corrected edition, eds. Ray Griffin, David and Sherburne, Donald (New York: The Free Press, 1979 [1929]).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Richard, and Pickett, Kate, The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone (London: Penguin, 2010).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, Truth and Truthfulness (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Wiltsher, Nick, “Feeling, Emotion and Imagination: In Defence of Collingwood’s Expression Theory of Art,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 26, no. 4 (2018): 759–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm, Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft (Strassburg: Heitz & Mündel, 1894).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigation, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (New York: Macmillan, 1958).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, On Certainty (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Culture and Value, trans. Peter Winch, ed. Von Wright, G. H. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Zettel, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, eds. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Von Wright, G. H. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief, ed. Barrett, Cyril (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Ogden, C. K. (London: Routledge, 2000 [1922]).Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard, “On an Alleged Inconsistency in Collingwood’s Aesthetic,” in Krausz, Richard, ed., Critical Essays on the Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood, 68–78 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard, Art and Its Objects, second edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015 [1980]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, John, Errors of Reasoning: Naturalizing the Logic of Inference (London: College Publications, 2013).Google Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik, Explanation and Understanding (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Collins, Churchill College, Cambridge, Christopher Williams, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Book: Interpreting R. G. Collingwood
  • Online publication: 22 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009337021.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Collins, Churchill College, Cambridge, Christopher Williams, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Book: Interpreting R. G. Collingwood
  • Online publication: 22 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009337021.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Collins, Churchill College, Cambridge, Christopher Williams, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Book: Interpreting R. G. Collingwood
  • Online publication: 22 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009337021.016
Available formats
×