Book contents
- The International Mobility of Talent and Innovation
- Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Economic Development
- The International Mobility of Talent and Innovation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures, Tables, and Boxes
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The International Mobility of Inventors
- Part II Migration, Intellectual Property, Diasporas, Knowledge Flows, and Innovation
- 6 US High-Skilled Immigration, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship
- 7 Diaspora Networks, Knowledge Flows, and Brain Drain
- 8 Intellectual Property Protection and the Brain Drain
- 9 Brain Drain, Intellectual Property Rights, and Innovation in Africa
- Index
- References
7 - Diaspora Networks, Knowledge Flows, and Brain Drain
from Part II - Migration, Intellectual Property, Diasporas, Knowledge Flows, and Innovation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 June 2017
Book contents
- The International Mobility of Talent and Innovation
- Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Economic Development
- The International Mobility of Talent and Innovation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures, Tables, and Boxes
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The International Mobility of Inventors
- Part II Migration, Intellectual Property, Diasporas, Knowledge Flows, and Innovation
- 6 US High-Skilled Immigration, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship
- 7 Diaspora Networks, Knowledge Flows, and Brain Drain
- 8 Intellectual Property Protection and the Brain Drain
- 9 Brain Drain, Intellectual Property Rights, and Innovation in Africa
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The International Mobility of Talent and InnovationNew Evidence and Policy Implications, pp. 222 - 242Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Agrawal, A. (2006), “Engaging the inventor: exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge,” Strategic Management Journal, 27(1): 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., and McHale, J. (2006), “Gone but not forgotten: knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships,” Journal of Economic Geography, 6(5): 571–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A., Kapur, D., and McHale, J. (2008), “How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data,” Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2): 258–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A., Kapur, D., McHale, J., and Oettl, A. (2011), “Brain drain or brain bank? The impact of skilled emigration on poor-country innovation,” Journal of Urban Economics, 69(1): 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeri, T., Brücker, H., and Docquier, F. (2012), Brain Drain and Brain Gain: The Global Competition to Attract High-Skilled Migrants, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breschi, S., and Lissoni, F. (2001), “Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4): 975–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breschi, S., and Lissoni, F. (2009), “Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows,” Journal of Economic Geography, 9(4): 439–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combes, P.-P., and Duranton, G. (2006), “Labour pooling, labour poaching, and spatial clustering,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docquier, F., and Marfouk, A. (2006), “International migration by education attainment (1990–2000),” in Özden, Ç. and Schiff, M. (eds.), International Migration, Remittances and the Brain Drain, London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 151–99.Google Scholar
Docquier, F., and Rapoport, H. (2012), “Globalization, brain drain, and development,” Journal of Economic Literature, 50(3): 681–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, J. S., Hsu, D. H., and Stern, S. (2008), “The impact of uncertain intellectual property rights on the market for ideas: evidence from patent grant delays,” Management Science, 54(5): 982–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, J. S., and Stern, S. (2003), “The product market and the market for ‘ideas’: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs,” Research Policy, 32(2): 333–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, J., and Glaeser, E. L. (1998), “Information technology and the future of cities,” Journal of Urban Economics, 43(1): 136–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlach, H., Rønde, T., and Stahl, K. (2009), “Labor pooling in R&D intensive industries,” Journal of Urban Economics, 65(1): 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z. (1958), “Research costs and social returns: hybrid corn and related innovations,” Journal of Political Economy, 66(5): 419–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. (1993), “Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. F. (2008), “The knowledge trap: human capital and development reconsidered,” Working Paper No. 14138, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, available at www.nber.org/papers/w14138 (accessed August 18, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, S., and MacGarvie, M. J. (2014), “How important Is U.S. location for research in science?,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(2): 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, W. R. (2008), “Ethnic scientific communities and international technology diffusion,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3): 518–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, W. R. (2010), The Agglomeration of U.S. Ethnic Inventors, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 237–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, F., and Stern, S. (2007), “Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4): 648–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanda, R., and Khanna, T. (2010), “Diasporas and domestic entrepreneurs: evidence from the Indian software industry,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 19(4): 991–1012.Google Scholar
Saxenian, A. (2006), The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. (1986), “Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy,” Research Policy, 15(6): 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P., and Fox-Kean, M. (2005), “Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: a reassessment,” American Economic Review, 95(1): 450–60.Google Scholar
Trajtenberg, M. (1990), “A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations,” RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1): 172–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, H. L. (2013), “Intellectual property rights and innovation: evidence from the human genome,” Journal of Political Economy, 121(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar