Book contents
- The International Law of Sovereign Debt Dispute Settlement
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 171
- The International Law of Sovereign Debt Dispute Settlement
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes, Bills and Treaties
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Regulation through Contract and Litigation
- Part II Regulation through Treaty and Arbitration
- 6 Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunals over Sovereign Debt Disputes
- 7 Admissibility of Sovereign Bond Claims
- 8 Checks and Balances at the Stage of Merits
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
8 - Checks and Balances at the Stage of Merits
from Part II - Regulation through Treaty and Arbitration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2022
- The International Law of Sovereign Debt Dispute Settlement
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 171
- The International Law of Sovereign Debt Dispute Settlement
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes, Bills and Treaties
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Regulation through Contract and Litigation
- Part II Regulation through Treaty and Arbitration
- 6 Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunals over Sovereign Debt Disputes
- 7 Admissibility of Sovereign Bond Claims
- 8 Checks and Balances at the Stage of Merits
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
Summary
Finally, the checks and balances of sovereign debt restructuring by investment tribunals are also implemented as a matter of the interpretation of the substantive provisions. Given that investment arbitral jurisprudence has incorporated the doctrine of margin of appreciation, the study has concluded that a deferential review of policy decision-making by debtor sovereigns is available and appropriate for arbitral tribunals. Concretely, the arbitral jurisprudence on the provisions providing standards of protection and defence on merits may afford a balancing exercise that enables safeguarding the legitimate policy of debt restructuring without sacrificing bondholder protection.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The International Law of Sovereign Debt Dispute Settlement , pp. 239 - 283Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022