Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T18:23:05.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - International crimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

David Armstrong ,
Theo Farrell  and
Hélène Lambert
David Armstrong
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Theo Farrell
Affiliation:
King's College London
Hélène Lambert
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Get access

Summary

International criminal law is a relatively new area of law. Traditionally and in general, the state has exercised jurisdiction over the definition and prosecution of crimes committed on its territory and/or by its subjects/citizens. Piracy has been an important exception, in that for hundreds of years it has been recognised as a crime for which all states could exercise jurisdiction, regardless of where the crime of piracy was committed and the nationality of the pirates. In the nineteenth century, states began to develop treaty law to regulate the conduct of warfare. States also began to recognise the most serious violations of these laws of armed conflict (LOAC) as incurring individual criminal liability over which extraterritorial jurisdiction might be exercised. In the twentieth century, and especially following World War II (WWII), states began to develop substantive and procedural rules on international crimes, including serious violations of LOAC, crimes against humanity and the crimes of genocide, torture and terrorism. The underlying principle is one of universal jurisdiction, exercisable by states and competent international criminal tribunals and courts, for crimes that are generally considered to be especially heinous.

International crimes cover a wide range of offences, with the spectrum running from drugs trafficking and the sex trade at the one end, to acts of terrorism, wars of aggression and genocide at the other end. This chapter focuses on the more serious end of this spectrum.

Type
Chapter
Information
International Law and International Relations , pp. 178 - 221
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bantekas, Ilias, and Nash, Susan, International Criminal Law, 3rd edition, London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007. A detailed examination of substantive, enforcement and procedural aspects of international criminal law, under both treaty and customary law.Google Scholar
Carnahan, Burrus M., ‘Lincoln, Lieber and the laws of war: the origins and limits of the principle of military necessity’, American Journal of International Law 92 (1998), 213–31. A fascinating article that explores the historical context of this crucial principle of LOAC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, International Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. A good introductory textbook on the subject by a former judge and President of the ICTY.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, The Conduct of Hostilities Under the Law of International Armed Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. An authoritative treatment of LOAC as it applies to international armed conflicts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournet, Caroline, International Crimes: Theories, Practice and Evolution, London: Cameron May, 2006. A comprehensive treatment of the definitional aspects of international crimes that also explores possibilities for change and for improving effectiveness in this area of law.Google Scholar
Gardam, Judith, Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. A thorough and long overdue study of these two key principles on LOAC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konotorovich, Eugene, ‘The piracy analogy: modern universal jurisdiction's hollow jurisdiction’, Harvard International Law Journal 45 (2004), 183–238. A provocative essay on the misapplication of state custom on piracy in the evolution of modern international criminal law.Google Scholar
Maguire, Peter, Law and War: An American Story (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001). A highly original study, combining historical analysis and personal critique, on the US role in the Nuremberg trials.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodore, ‘International Criminalization of Internal Atrocities’, American Journal of International Law 89 (1995), 554–77. An important article on the expansion of the international regulation of internal conflict.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meron, Theodore ‘The Martens Clause, principles of humanity, and dictates of public conscience’, American Journal of International Law 94 (2000), 78–89. An excellent essay on the role of the principles of humanity in LOAC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, Lindsay, The Law of Internal Armed Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. An authoritative treatment of LOAC as it applies to non-international armed conflicts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, Jason, Defending the Society of States: Why America Opposes the International Criminal Court and Its Vision of a World Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. The best account yet, combining international relations theory and international legal analysis, of US opposition to the ICC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Christopher, ‘Constructing an atrocities regime: the politics of war crimes tribunals’, International Organization 55 (2001), 644–91. A really good institutional analysis of the formation and functioning of international criminal tribunals.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, Philippe (ed.), From Nuremberg to the Hague: The Future of International Criminal Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. A fascinating set of essays that cover the path from Nuremberg to the ICC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, William A., ‘Enforcing International Humanitarian Law: Catching the Accomplices’, Review of the International Committee of the Red Cross 83 (2001), 439–59. A useful analysis of the provisions in international criminal law for enforcing LOAC.Google Scholar
Tallgren, Immi, ‘The sensibility and sense of international criminal law’, European Journal of International Law 13 (2002), 561–96. A thought-providing essay on the meaning and purpose of international criminal law. Especially good on the misuse of the domestic analogy in conceptualising international criminal law.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×