Book contents
- International Human Rights Law Beyond State Territorial Control
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 156
- International Human Rights Law Beyond State Territorial Control
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Legal Effect of Effective Control over Territory
- 3 The Human Rights Obligations of States
- 4 The Human Rights Obligations of Non-state Actors
- 5 The Responsibility of States
- 6 The Responsibility of Non-state Actors
- 7 Judicial Control Mechanisms
- 8 Non-judicial Control Mechanisms
- 9 General Conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 156
2 - The Legal Effect of Effective Control over Territory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 June 2021
- International Human Rights Law Beyond State Territorial Control
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 156
- International Human Rights Law Beyond State Territorial Control
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Legal Effect of Effective Control over Territory
- 3 The Human Rights Obligations of States
- 4 The Human Rights Obligations of Non-state Actors
- 5 The Responsibility of States
- 6 The Responsibility of Non-state Actors
- 7 Judicial Control Mechanisms
- 8 Non-judicial Control Mechanisms
- 9 General Conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 156
Summary
The chapter answers the question of whether international human rights treaties apply to the conduct of States in an area outside the effective control of the territorial State. In international human rights law, ‘jurisdiction’ is the principal criterion of the scope of application ratione loci of conventions. States and monitoring bodies have interpreted the notion of jurisdiction ratione loci first in cases related to the conduct of States beyond their borders (outside State), and later with regard to the territorial State in a part of its own territory outside its effective control. The chapter explains that the two States’ jurisdictions are concurrent and complementary.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021