Book contents
- Intellectual History and the Problem of Conceptual Change
- The Seeley Lectures
- Intellectual History and the Problem of Conceptual Change
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Pocock, Skinner, and the “Historiographical Revolution”
- Chapter 2 The Republican Genealogy and the Normative Temptation
- Chapter 3 The Problem of Conceptual Change
- Chapter 4 Conceptual History
- Chapter 5 Koselleck’s Begriffsgeschichte
- Chapter 6 Hans Blumenberg and the Theory of Nonconceptuality
- Chapter 7 From Structuralism to Poststructuralism
- Chapter 8 Foucault’s Archaeology of Knowledge
- Chapter 9 The Archaeological Project and the Ignored Epistemic Mutation
- Chapter 10 Behind the Structures and the Subject
- Conclusion
- Epilogue
- Quoted Bibliography
- Index
- References
Quoted Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 May 2024
Book contents
- Intellectual History and the Problem of Conceptual Change
- The Seeley Lectures
- Intellectual History and the Problem of Conceptual Change
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Pocock, Skinner, and the “Historiographical Revolution”
- Chapter 2 The Republican Genealogy and the Normative Temptation
- Chapter 3 The Problem of Conceptual Change
- Chapter 4 Conceptual History
- Chapter 5 Koselleck’s Begriffsgeschichte
- Chapter 6 Hans Blumenberg and the Theory of Nonconceptuality
- Chapter 7 From Structuralism to Poststructuralism
- Chapter 8 Foucault’s Archaeology of Knowledge
- Chapter 9 The Archaeological Project and the Ignored Epistemic Mutation
- Chapter 10 Behind the Structures and the Subject
- Conclusion
- Epilogue
- Quoted Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Intellectual History and the Problem of Conceptual Change , pp. 267 - 280Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Quoted Bibliography
Adorno, T. W., Albert, H., Dahrendorf, R., Habermas, J., Pilot, H., and Popper, K.. The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. London: Heinemann, 1976.Google Scholar
Åkerstrøm Andersen, Niels. Discursive Analytical Strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: The Policy Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Alberini, Coriolano. Precisiones sobre la evolución del pensamiento argentino. Buenos Aires: Docencia, 1981.Google Scholar
Allen, J. W. A History of Political Thought in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1961.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl and Sturma, Dieter, eds. The Modern Subject: Conceptions of the Self in Classical German Philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, F. R. Sublime Historical Experience. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . On Rhetoric: The Theory of Civic Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Artières, Philippe, Bert, Jean-François, Chevallier, Philippe, Michon, Pascal, Potte-Bonneville, Mathieu, Revel, Judith, and Zancarini, Jean-Claude, eds. Les mots et les choses de Michel Foucault: Regards critiques, 1966–1968. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Caen, 2009.Google Scholar
von Baer, Karl E. “On the Genesis of the Ovum of Mammals and of Man.” Isis 47 (1956): 117–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balibar, Étienne and Apter, Emily. Citizen Subject: Foundations for Philosophical Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, Terence. “Confessions of a Conceptual Historian.” Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 6 (2002): 11–31.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell, eds. Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Baynes, Kenneth, Bohman, James, and McCarthy, Thomas, eds. After Philosophy: End or Transformation? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. Time and Free Will (An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness). New York: Harper & Row, 1960.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark. The Logic of the History of Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. The Genesis of the Copernican World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. Shipwreck with Spectator: Paradigm for a Metaphor of Existence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. Paradigms for a Metaphorology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, Richard. “Hegel and the French Revolution.” Journal of European Ideas XLIX (2023): 757–768.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel, Donaldson, Megan, and Koskenniemi, Martti, eds. History, Politics, Law: Thinking through the International. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, Annabel and Tully, James, eds. Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart, eds. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historische Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Band 7. Stuttgart: Kelt-Cotta, 1992.Google Scholar
Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P., eds. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: The University Press of Chicago, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Edmund. Burke’s Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful: With an Introductory Discourse Concerning Taste. London: J. F. Dove, 1827.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, Laclau, Ernesto, and Žižek, Slavoj. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. New York: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar
Cadava, Eduardo, Connor, Peter, and Nancy, Jean-Luc, eds. Who Comes after the Subject? New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Canguilhem, Georges. Études d ́Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences. Paris: Vrin, 1977.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Castro, Edgardo. El vocabulario de Michel Foucault: Un recorrido alfabético por sus temas, conceptos y autores. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2004.Google Scholar
Castro, Edgardo. Para leer Las palabras y las cosas de Michel Foucault. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión, 2007.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. “Aux lecteurs.” Revue de synthese CVII, 1/2 (1986): 5–7, signed by “La Rédaction.”Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution. Durham: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Chignola, Sandro and Duso, Giuseppe, eds. Historia de los conceptos y filosofía política. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, 2009.Google Scholar
Chignola, Sandro and Duso, Giuseppe, Foucault’s Politics of Philosophy: Power, Law and Subjectivity. London: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Clifford, James and Marcus, George. Writing Culture. Berkeley: California University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. Autobiography and Other Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Curso sobre Foucault. Buenos Aires: Cactus, 2013–2015, 3 vols. English translation: The Deleuze Seminars (website), Purdue University, available at: https://deleuze.cla.purdue.edu/ (last accessed January 2, 2024).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Introduction,” in Husserl, Edmund, ed. L’Origine de la Géométrie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1962, 1–171.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. La voix et le phénomène. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1967.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Le problème de la genèse dans la philosophie de Husserl. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1990.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “The Purveyor of Truth.” Yale French Studies 96 (1999): 124–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. The Beast and the Sovereign, Vol. I. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. Gesammelte Schriften VII: Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner, 1965.Google Scholar
Dosse, François. Histoire du structuralisme: II: Le chant du cygne, 1967 à nos jours. Paris: La Découverte, 1992.Google Scholar
Dosse, François. La marche des idées: Histoire des intellectuels – histoire intellectuelle. Paris: La Découverte, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, Lisa. The Cambridge Introduction to Michel Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Herbert and Rabinow, Paul. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John. “The Identity of the History of Ideas.” Philosophy XLIII.164 (1968): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John. Rethinking Modern Political Theory: Essays 1979–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. Interpreting Political Responsibility. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the “Two Treatises of Government.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. Political Obligation in Its Historical Context: Essays in Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Durán Guerra, Luis. “Metáfora y mundo de la vida en Hans Blumenberg.” Revista de Filosofía XXXV.2 (2010): 105–127.Google Scholar
Dutt, Carsten and Laube, Reinhard, eds. Reinhart Koselleck: Sprache und Geschichte. Göttingen: Walten, 2013.Google Scholar
Falzon, Christopher, O’Leary, Timothy, and Sawicki, Jana, eds. A Companion to Foucault. Oxford: Blackwell, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Febvre, Lucien. The Problem of Unbelief in the Sixteenth Century: The Religion of Rabelais. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Figgis, John N. Studies of Political Thought from Gerson to Grotius, 1414–1625. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1923.Google Scholar
Filmer, Robert. Patriarcha and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Flasch, Kurt. Hans Blumenberg: Philosoph in Deutschland 1945–1966. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flügel-Martinsen, Oliver, Martinsen, Franziska, Sawyer, Stephen W., and Schulz, Daniel, eds. Pierre Rosanvallon’s Political Thought. Bielefeld: Bielefeld University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Forbes, Nancy and Mahon, Basil. Faraday, Maxwell, and the Electromagnetic Field: How Two Men Revolutionized Physics. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2014.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Dits et Écrits 1954–1988: I: 1954–1969. Paris: Gallimard, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Manfred. What Is Neostructuralism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Fraser, J. T., ed. The Voices of Time: A Cooperative Survey of Man’s View of Time as Expressed by the Sciences and the Humanities. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. A General Introduction to Psycho-Analysis. New York: Boni and Liveright, 1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritzman, J. M. “Blumenberg and the Rationality of Rhetoric.” Rhetorica X.4 (1992): 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Kleine Schriften III: Idee und Sprache: Platon, Husserl, Heidegger. Tübingen: Moher, 1972.Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1955–1956): 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, Peter. “Citizen or Subject? Michel Foucault in the History of Ideas.” History of European Ideas 24 (1998): 113–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Gierke, Otto. Natural Law and the Theory of Society: 1500–1800. Boston: Beacon, 1957.Google Scholar
Gombricht, E. H. Art and Illusion: A Study of the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. New York: Pantheon Books, 1960.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. “The History of Ideas: Precept and Practice, 1950–2000 and Beyond.” Journal of the History of Ideas LXVII.1 (2006): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutting, Gary. Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Scientific Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Gutting, Gary. ed. The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Gwyn, William G. The Meaning of Separation of Powers: Its Origin to the Adoption of the United States Constitution. New Orleans: Tulane University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampsher-Monk, Iain. “Review Article: Political Language in Time: The Work of J.G.A. Pocock.” The British Journal of Political Science 14 (1984): 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. The Phenomenology of the Spirit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1977.Google Scholar
Heredia, Juan Manuel. Mundología: Jakob von Uexküll, Aventuras inactuales de un personaje conceptual. Buenos Aires: Cactus, 2022.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höpfl, Harro. Jesuit Political Thought: The Company of Jesus and the State: C.1540–1630. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Huizinga, Johann. Men and Ideas: History, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance. New York: Meridian Book, 1965.Google Scholar
von Humboldt, Wilhelm. On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and Its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. L’Origine de la Géométrie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1962.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Ingram, David. “Blumenberg and the Philosophical Grounds of Historiography.” History and Theory XXIX.1 (1990): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, Friedrich H. “David Hume über den Glauben, oder Idealismus und Realismus: Ein Gespräch,” in Werke, vol. II. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1968.Google Scholar
Jauss, H. R. Untersuchungen zur mittelalterlichen Tierdichtung. The Hague: Gruyter Mouton, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jay, Martin. Force Fields: Between Intellectual History and Cultural Critique. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. Songs of Experience: Modern American and European Variations on a Universal Theme. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. Genesis and Validity: The Theory and Practice of Intellectual History. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeppesen, Morten Haugaard, Stjernfelt, Frederik, and Thorup, Mikkel, eds. Intellectual History: 5 Questions. Copenhagen: Automatic Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Kants Werke, Erster Band: Vorkritische Schriften. Verlag: Berlin, 1923.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst H. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Steven and LaCapra, Dominick, eds. Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals and New Perspectives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald. “Horizons of Intellectual History: Retrospect, Circumspect, Prospect.” Journal of History of Ideas 48 (1987): 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Donald. “What Is Happening to the History of Ideas?” Journal of the History of Ideas L.1 (1990): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, Hans. Language and Historical Representation: Getting the Story Crooked. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. A New Science of Politics: Hans Kelsen’s Reply to Eric Voegelin’s “New Science of Politics:” A Contribution to the Critique of Ideology. Frankfurt: Onto Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
Kittler, Friedrich. Discourse Networks 1800/1900. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinberg, Ethan. Haunting History: For a Deconstructive Approach to the Past. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Koikkalainen, Petri and Syrjämäki, Sami. “On Encountering the Past: An Interview with Quentin Skinner.” Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 6 (2002): 34–63.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. “Richtlinien für das Lexikon politisch-sozialer Begriffe der Neuzeit.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 11 (1967): 81–99.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. “Begriffsgeschichtliche Probleme der Verfassungsgeschichtsschreibung,” in Der Staat: Beiheft 6: Gegenstand und Begriffe der Verfassungsgeschichtsschreibung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1983, 8–21.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Oxford: Berg, 1988.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. Zeitschichten Studien zur Historik. Frankfurt am Main: Surkhamp Verlag, 2000.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart and Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Historia y hermenéutica. Barcelona: Paidós, 1997.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Kurunmäki, Jussi and Palonen, Kari, eds. Zeit, Geschichte und Politik. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Printing House, 2003.Google Scholar
Labatut, Benjamín. When We Cease to Understand the World. New York: New York Review Books, 2021.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book XIII 1975–76: The Sinthome. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.Google Scholar
LaCapra, Dominick. Rethinking Intellectual History: Texts, Contexts, Language. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Melissa. “Doing Our Own Thinking for Ourselves: On Quentin Skinner’s Genealogical Turn.” Journal of the History of Ideas LXXIII.1 (2012): 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leclerc, Georges-Louis, de Buffon, Comte. Discours sur le style: A Facsimile of the 1753 Edition. Hull: Hull French Texts, 1978.Google Scholar
Lefort, Claude. The Political Forms of Modern Society: Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Lefort, Claude. Democracy and Political Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Hartmut and Richter, Melvin, eds. The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte. Washington, DC: German Historical Institute, 1996.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. F. Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil. Lasalle, IL: Open Court, 1996.Google Scholar
Leslie, Margaret. “In Defense of Anachronism.” Political Studies XVIII.4 (1970): 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévinas, Emmanuel. Totalité et Infini, Essai sur 1’exteriorité. Paris: Kluwer Academic, 1971.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, Konrad. Here I Am: Where Are You?: A Lifetime’s Study of the Uncannily Human Behaviour of Greylag Geese. New York: Harper Collins, 1990.Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri. “On the Semiosphere.” Sign Systems Studies XXXIII.1 (2005): 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur. “Reflections on the History of Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas I.1 (1940): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur. Essays in the History of Ideas. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur. Reflections on Human Nature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur. The Reason, the Understanding, and Time. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur. The Thirteen Pragmatism and Other Essays. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur and Boas, George. Primitivism and Related Ideas in Antiquity. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Lukács, György. Die Seele und die Formen. Berlin: Egon Fleischel, 1911. English translation: Soul and Form. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Machado, Antonio. Border of a Dream: Selected Poems. Port Townsend: Copper Canyon Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
de Maistre, Joseph. Considerations of France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Marchard, Oliver. Post-Foundational Political Thought. Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
de Mariana, Juan. La dignidad real y la educación del Rey. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, 1981.Google Scholar
Marquard, Odo. “Laudatio auf Hans Blumenberg.” Deutsche Akademie für Sprache und Dichtung (1981): 53–56.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton & Company, 1978.Google Scholar
Maturana, Humberto and Varela, Francisco. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Darrin and Moyn, Samuel, eds. Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNabb, Darin. Hombre, signo y cosmos: La filosofía de Charles Sanders Peirce. Mexico: Fondode Cultura Económica, 2018.Google Scholar
Melching, Willem and Welema, Wyger, eds. Main Trends in Cultural History: Ten Essays. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melville, Herman. Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street, 2004, available at: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/11231 (last accessed January 2, 2024).Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Ezra. Hofman, Stefani, and Cohen, Richard I., eds. Against the Grain: Jewish Intellectuals in Hard Times. New York: Berghahn Books, 2014.Google Scholar
Mesnard, Pierre. L’ Essor de la philosophie politique au XVIe siècle. Paris: Boivin & Cie., 1936.Google Scholar
Monod, Jean-Claude. “Les recompositions du modèle politique français: Le jacobinisme amendé selon Pierre Rosanvallon.” Esprit 306.7 (2004): 54–66.Google Scholar
Namier, Lewis. The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederman, Cary. “Conciliarism and Constitutionalism: Jean Gerson and Medieval Political Thought.” Journal of European Ideas 12 (1990): 189–209.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World. Berkeley: California University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Olsen, Niklas. History in the Plural: An Introduction to the Work of Reinhart Koselleck. New York: Berghahn Books, 2012.Google Scholar
Oncina Coves, Faustino. “Historia conceptual y hermenéutica.” Azafea: Revista de Filosofía 5 (2003): 161–190.Google Scholar
Oncina Coves, Faustino. ed. Tradición e innovación en la historia intellectual: Métodos historiográficos. Madrid: Siglo XXI, 2013.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. “An Application of Conceptual History to Itself: From Method to Theory in Reinhart Koselleck’s Begriffsgeschichte.” Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 1.1 (1997): 39–69.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. Quentin Skinner: History, Politics Rhetoric. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Palti, Elías J. “In Memoriam: Hans Blumenberg (1920–1996): An Unended Quest.” Journal of the History of Ideas CVIII.3 (1997): 503–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palti, Elías J. Giro lingüístico e historia intelectual. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 1998.Google Scholar
Palti, Elías J. “Koselleck y la idea de Sattelzeit. Un debate sobre modernidad y temporalidad”. Ayer: Revista de Historia Contemporánea 53 (2004): 63–74.Google Scholar
Palti, Elías J. “Ideas, Concepts, Metaphors: The German Tradition of Intellectual History and the Complex Fabric of Language.” History and Theory 49 (2010): 194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palti, Elías J. “Reinhart Koselleck, His Concept of the Concept and Its History.” Contributions to the History of Concepts VI.2 (2011): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palti, Elías J. An Archaeology of the Political: Regimes of Power from the Seventeenth Century to the Present. New York: Columbia University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palti, Elías J. Verdades y saberes del marxismo: Reacciones de una tradición política ante su “crisis”. Buenos Aires: Fonde de Cultura Económica, 2005. French edition: Vérités et savoirs du marxisme. Réactions d’une tradition politique à sa crise. Paris: Editions Delga, 2018.Google Scholar
Palti, Elías J. “Deleuze’s Foucault: On the Possibility of an Outside of Knowledge/Power.” History and Theory 60.4 (2021): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palti, Elías J. La nation comme problème: Les historiens et le “question nationale.” Paris: L’Harmattan, 2022.Google Scholar
Palti, Elías J. Misplaced Ideas? Political-Intellectual History in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, Jean. Biology and Knowledge: An Essay on the Relations between Organic Regulations and Cognitive Processes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The History of Political Thought: A Methodological Enquiry. Oxford: Blackwell, 1962.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. Virtue, Commerce and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. Barbarism and Religion, 6 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999–2018.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. Political Thought and History: Essays on Theory and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya and Stengers, Isabelle. Order out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. London: Heinneman, 1984.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya and Stengers, Isabelle. The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos and the New Laws of Nature. New York: Free Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul and Dreyfus, Hubert. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebello Cardoso, Helio Jr.. “Peirce and Foucault on Time and History: The Tasks of (Dis) Continuity.” History and Theory 55 (2016): 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Melvin. “Conceptual History (Begriffsgeschichte) and Political Theory.” Political Theory 14 (1986): 604–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Melvin. “Begriffsgeschichte and the History of Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas XLVIII.2 (1987): 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Melvin. “Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner, and the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe.” History and Theory XXIX.1 (1990): 38–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Melvin. The History of Political and Social Concepts: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Melvin and Lemann, H., eds., The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte. Washington, DC: German Historical Institute, 1996.Google Scholar
Rivera García, Antonio, “Mito, metáfora absoluta y filosofía política.” Ingenium: Revista de historia del pensamiento moderno 4 (2010): 145–165.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Pablo Manolo. Las palabras en las cosas: Saber, poder y subjetivación entre algoritmos y biomoléculas. Buenos Aires: Cactus, 2019.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le sacre du citoyen: Histoire du suffrage universel en France. Paris: Gallimard, 1992.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le peuple introuvable: Histoire de la représentation démocratique en France. Paris: Gallimard, 1998.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. La démocratie inachevée: Histoire de la souveraineté du peuple en France. Paris: Gallimard, 2000.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Pour une histoire conceptuelle du politique: Leçon inaugurale au Collège de France faite le jeudi 28 mars 2002. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2003.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le Modèle politique français: La société civile contre le jacobinisme de 1789 à nos jours. Paris: Seuil, 2004.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Democracy, Past and Future. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Russell, E. S. Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology. London: John Murray, 1916.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. Collected Papers: Volume 2: Collected Essays 1929–1968. London: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieder, W. and Sellin, V., eds. Sozialgeschichte in Deutchland. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastián, Javier Fernandez. “Historia Intelectual y Democracia (Entrevista con Pierre Rosanvallon).” Historia 125 (2007): 14–26.Google Scholar
Sebastián, Javier Fernandez. “Intellectual History; Liberty and Republicanism: An Interview with Quentin Skinner.” Contributions 3 (2007): 103–123.Google Scholar
Sebastián, Javier Fernandez. ed. Political Concepts and Time: New Approaches to Conceptual History. Santander: McGraw Hill Interamericana de España, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shew, Melissa M. The Phenomenon of Chance in Ancient Greek Thought. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Oregon, 2018.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. The Problems of the Philosophy of History. An Epistemological Essay. New York: The Free Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory VIII.1 (1969): 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Ambrogio Lorenzatti: The Artist as Political Philosopher. London: The British Academy, 1987.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Vision of Politics, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “On the Liberty of the Ancients and the Moderns: A Reply to My Critics.” Journal of the History of Ideas LXXIII.1 (2012): 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. First Principles of a New System of Philosophy. Whithorn: Anodos Books, 2019.Google Scholar
Stegmüller, Wolfgang. The Structure and Dynamics of Theories. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syrjämäki, Sami. Sins of a Historian: Perspectives on the Problem of Anachronism. Academic Dissertation. University of Tampere, 2011.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith. “Politics Recaptured.” New York Review of Books, May 17, 1979. Available at: www.nybooks.com/articles/1979/05/17/politics-recaptured/ (last accessed December 22, 2023).Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, Hugh. The Crisis of the Seventeenth Century: Religion, the Reformation and Social Change. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2001.Google Scholar
Tully, James. Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
von Uexküll, Jakob. A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Verdo, Geneviève. “Pierre Rosanvallon, Archéologue de la Démocratie.” Revue historique 623 (2002): 693–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villacañas Berlanga, José L. “Walter Banjamin y Carl Schmitt: soberanía y estado de excepción.” Daimon. Revista de Filosofía 13 (1996): 41–60.Google Scholar
Villacañas Berlanga, José L. “De nobis ipsis silemus: Reflexiones sobre Hans Blumenberg, lector de Kant.” Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofía 33 (2014): 65–78.Google Scholar
Wallace, Robert M. “Progress, Secularization and Modernity: The Löwith-Blumenberg Debate.” New German Critique 22 (1981): 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. The Revolution of Saints: A Study in the Origins of Radical Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Wetz, Franz Joseph. Hans Blumenberg, zur Einführung. Frankfurt am Main: Junius Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar
Whatmore, Richard and Young, Brian, eds. A Companion to Intellectual History. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2016.Google Scholar
Wiener, Philip P., ed. Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1968–1975.Google Scholar
Wilson, Daniel J. Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Quest for Intelligibility. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.Google Scholar