Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:14:59.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix C - Historical Notes on the Development of Leontief’s Input–Output Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2022

Ronald E. Miller  and
Peter D. Blair
Ronald E. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Peter D. Blair
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Input-Output Analysis
Foundations and Extensions
 , pp. 771 - 785
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham-Frois, Gilbert and Lendjel, Emeric. 2006. “Father Potron’s Early Contributions to Input–Output Analysis,” Economic Systems Research, 18, 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, William. 2000. “Leontief’s Great Leap Forward,” Economic Systems Research, 12, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjerkholt, Olav and Kurz, Heinz D.. 2006. “Introduction: the History of Input–Output Analysis, Leontief’s Path and Alternative Tracks,” Economic Systems Research, 18, 331–333.Google Scholar
Cantillon, Richard. 1755. Essay on the Nature of General Commerce. Reprinted, edited, and translated into English by Higgs, H.. London: Macmillan, 1931.Google Scholar
Davenant, Charles. 1699. An Essay upon the Probable Methods of Making a People Gainers in the Balance of Trade. London: James Knapton.Google Scholar
DeBresson, Christian. 2004. “Some Highlights in the Life of Wassily Leontief – An Interview with Estelle and Wassily Leontief,” in Dietzenbacher, Erik and Lahr, Michael L. (eds.), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmitriev, Vladimir K. 1974. Economic Essays on Value, Competition and Utility, 1898–1902. Edited with introduction by Nuti, D. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, W. Duane and Hoffenberg, Marvin. 1952. “The Interindustry Relations Study for 1947,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 34, 97–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Alexander. 1931. The Development of Economic Doctrine. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Isnard, Achille-Nicolas. 1781. Traite des Richesses (2 Volumes). London: F. Grasset.Google Scholar
Kaliadina, Svetlana A. and Pavlova, Natal’ia Iu. 2006. “The Family of W. W Leontief in Russia” (translated into English by Wittich, Claus), Economic Systems Research, 18, 335–345.Google Scholar
Klein, Judy L. 2001. “Reflections on the Age of Measurement,” in Klein, Judy L. and Morgan, Mary S. (eds.), The Age of Economic Measurement. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 111–136.Google Scholar
Kohli, Martin C. 2001. “The Leontief-BLS Relationship: A New Framework for Measurement,” Monthly Labor Review, 124 , 29–37.Google Scholar
Kurz, Heinz D. 2011. “Who is Going to Kiss Sleeping Beauty? On the ‘Classical’ Analytical Origins and Perspectives of Input–Output Analysis,” Review of Political Economy, 23, 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, Heinz D. and Salvadori, Neri. 2000a. ‘“Classical Roots’ of Input–Output Analysis: A Short Account of its Long Prehistory,” Economic Systems Research, 12 , 153–179.Google Scholar
Kurz, Heinz D. and Salvadori, Neri. 2000b. “Piero Sraffa’s Contributions to Economics: A Brief Survey,” in Kurz, Heinz D. (ed.), Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa’s Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
Kurz, Heinz D. and Salvadori, Neri. (eds.). 2003. The Legacy of Piero Sraffa, Vols. 1 and 2. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kurz, Heinz D. and Salvadori, Neri. 2006. “Input–Output Analysis from a Wider Perspective: A Comparison of the Early Works of Leontief and Sraffa,” Economic Systems Research, 18, 373–390.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. 1937. National Income and Capital Formation, 1919–1935, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. 1973. “Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections,” American Economic Review, 63(3) 247–258.Google Scholar
Landefeld, J. Steven and McCulla, Stephanie H.. 1999. “Wassily Leontief and His Contributions to Economic Accounting,” Survey of Current Business, 79 (March), 9–11.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1928. “The Economy as a Circular Flow” (in German), Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 60, 577–623. Reprinted and translated into English in Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2 (1991), 181–212.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1936. “Quantitative Input–Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 18, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1941. The Structure of American Economy 1919–1929. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1951. The Structure of American Economy 1919–1929 (Second Edition, revised and enlarged). New York: Oxford University Press. Reprint. White Plains, NY: International Arts and Sciences Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1966a. Essays in Economics: Theories and Theorizing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1966b. Input–Output Economics. New York: Oxford University Press. (Second Edition, 1986.)Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1974. “Structure of the World Economy,” American Economic Review, 64, 823–834.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily, Chenery, Hollis B., Clark, Paul G., Duesenberry, James S., Ferguson, Allen R., Grosse, Anne P., Grosse, Robert N., Holzman, Mathilda, Isard, Walter and Kisten, Helen. 1953. Studies in the Structure of the American Economy. New York: Oxford University Press. (Reprint. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe Inc., 1976.)Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1894. Das Kapital, Vol. III, edited by Engels, F.. Hamburg: Meissner. (English translation. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1959.)Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1905. A History of Economic Theories. Edited by Kautsky, Karl, Translated by Terence McCarthy. New York: The Langland Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Meade, Douglas S. 2017. “Early Days of the Input–Output Table,” in Ten Raa, Thijs (ed.), Handbook of Input–Output Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 7–40.Google Scholar
Meek, Ronald L. 1965. “Problems of the Tableau Economique,” in Gherity, James (ed.), Economic Thought: A Historical Anthology. New York: Random House, pp. 115–149.Google Scholar
Mirabeau, M. 1766. Philosophie Rurale ou Economic Generate et Politique de L’agriculture Pour Servir a L’ami des Hommes. Amsterdam: Chez Les Libraires Associes.Google Scholar
Sir Petty, William. 1690. Discourse on Political Arithmetick. Reprinted in Hull, Charles H. (ed.), The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899 (two volumes).Google Scholar
Sir Petty, William. 1691. “Verbum Sapienti,” in Political Anatomy of Ireland. London: Brown and Rodgers. Reprinted in Charles H. Hull (ed.), The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899 (two volumes).Google Scholar
Phillips, Almarin. 1955. “The Tableau Economique as a Simple Leontief Model,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 137–144.Google Scholar
Polenske, Karen R. 1999. “Wassily W. Leontief, 1905–1999,” Economic Systems Research, 11 , 341–348.Google Scholar
Polenske, Karen R. 2004. “Leontief’s ‘Magnificent Machine’ and Other Contributions to Applied Economics,” in Dietzenbacher, Erik and Lahr, Michael L. (eds.), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–29.Google Scholar
Pyatt, Graham. 2000. “Review of Some British Empiricists in the Social Sciences, 1650–1900 by Richard Stone,” Economic Systems Research, 12, 425–426.Google Scholar
Quesnay, Francois. 1759. Le Tableau Économique. Archival versions: “First” 1758 Edition (accompanied by Remarques sur les variations de la distribution des revenus annuels d’une nation; manuscript); “Second” 1759 Edition (accompanied by Extrait des economies royales de M. de Sully); and “Third” 1759 Edition (accompanied by Explication du tableau economique and an expanded and footnoted Extrait des économies royales de M. de Sully). Also, edited and translated to English by Marguerite Kuczynski and Ronald L. Meek. London: Macmillan, 1972.Google Scholar
Rose, Adam and Miernyk, William. 1989. “Input–Output Analysis: The First Fifty Years,” Economic Systems Research, 1, 229–271.Google Scholar
Routh, Guy, 1975. The Origin of Economic Ideas. New York: International Arts and Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 2004. “A Portrait of the Master as a Young Man,” in Dietzenbacher, Erik and Lahr, Michael L. (eds.), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 2005. “Abram Bergson, Economist, April 21, 1914–April 23, 2003,” The Economic Journal, 115, F130–F133.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Reprinted in The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Solow, Robert M. 1998. “Rereading The Structure of the American Economy,” Economic Systems Research, 10, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soule, George. 1952. Ideas of the Great Economists. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, Piero (ed.). 1951–1973.The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 1810–1824. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11 volumes.Google Scholar
Sraffa, Piero 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steenge, Albert E. and van den Berg, Richard. 2007. “Transcribing the Tableau Économique: Input–Output Analysis à la Quesnay,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 29, 331–358.Google Scholar
Stone, Richard. 1961. Input–Output and National Accounts. Paris: Organization for European Economic Co-operation.Google Scholar
Stone, Richard. 1973. “A System of Social Matrices,” Review of Income and Wealth, 19, 143–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Richard. 1984. “Where Are We Now? A Short Account of Input–Output Studies and Their Present Trends,” in United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Input–Output Techniques. New York: United Nations, pp. 439–459. Reprinted in Ira Sohn (ed.), Readings in Input–Output Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
Stone, Richard. 1997. “The Accounts of Society” (Nobel Memorial Lecture, December 8, 1984),” American Economic Review, 87, 17–29.Google Scholar
Taylor, Overton. 1960. A History of Economic Thought. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Torrens, Robert. 1820. An Essay on the Influence of the External Corn Trade upon the Production and Distribution of National Wealth (Second Edition). London: Hatchard.Google Scholar
Torrens, Robert. 1821. An Essay on the Production of Wealth. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown. Reprinted and edited by Joseph Dorfman. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
von Bortkiewicz, Ladislaus. 1906, 1907. “Value and Price in the Marxian System” (in German), Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 23 (1906), 1–50; 25 (1907), 1–51 and 445–488. Reprinted and translated into English in International Economic Papers, 2, 5–60.Google Scholar
Walras, Leon. 1874. Elements of Pure Economics. Paris: Guillaumin & Cie. English translation by William Jaffé. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×