Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-08T23:57:20.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Conclusions Based on Calculations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

Martin Harwit
Martin Harwit
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

The logic of well-founded but far-reaching theories may at times be extended to problems so far removed from normal experience that the derived results violate intuition. Doubts then arise about the validity of applying the theory to such extreme conditions, and the theory's original inventors may become its most severe critics.

A Problem Biding Its Time

When is the right time to ask a question? Some questions can be answered almost as soon as they are posed. Others cannot be answered either because they are awkwardly put or because the means for answering them are not at hand. One such question first surfaced late in the eighteenth century.

As early as 1783, the Reverend John Michell, an English natural philosopher and geologist, conceived of a star so compact and massive that its gravitational attraction would prevent light from escaping. He considered the motion of light in Newtonian terms, which suggested that the gravitational attraction of any star would slow down its emitted radiation. Although for most stars this deceleration might be minor, radiation escaping massive stars might have its speed appreciably diminished. For extremely massive compact stars, he thought the emitted light could actually come to a standstill before dropping back to the star's surface.

Michell was concerned not only with whether light could actually be prevented from escaping a star, but also with how we might recognize this. Perhaps his most important realization was that the existence of such a star might be inferred from the gravitational force it would exert on an orbiting companion.

Type
Chapter
Information
In Search of the True Universe
The Tools, Shaping, and Cost of Cosmological Thought
 , pp. 76 - 96
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Edmund C., Stoner and the Discovery of the Maximum Mass of White Dwarfs, Michael, Nauenberg, Journal for the History of Astronomy, 39, 1–16, 2008.
2. Black Holes and Time Warps – Einstein's Outrageous Legacy, Kip, Thorne. New York: W. W. Norton, 1994.Google Scholar
3. On the Means of discovering the Distance, Magnitude, &c. of the Fixed Stars, in consequence of the Diminution of the Velocity of Light, in case such a Diminution should be found to take place in any of them, and such other Data should be procured from Observations, as would be farther necessary for the Purpose, John, Michell, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 74, 35–57, 1784.
4. Ibid., On the Means, Michell, paragraph 29.
5. Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie, Karl, Schwarzschild, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, VII, 189–96, 1916.
6. Ibid., Über das Gravitationsfeld, Schwarzschild.
7. Letter from Karl Schwarzschild to Albert Einstein, December 22, 1915, and Einstein's reply dated December 29, 1915, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 8, The Berlin Years, Part A: 1914–1917, R., Schulmann, A. J., Knox, M., Janssen, J., Illy, eds. Princeton University Press, 1998, pp. 224 and 231.
8. Obituaries: Ralph Howard, Fowler, E. A., Milne, The Observatory, 65, 245–46, 1944.
9. The Distribution of Electrons among Atomic Levels, E. C., Stoner, Philosophical Magazine, 48, 719–36, 1924.
10. Über den Zusammenhang des Abschlusses der Elektronengruppen im Atom mit der Komplexstruktur der Spektren, W., Pauli jr.Zeitschrift für Physik, 31, 765–83, 1925.
11. Dirac, a scientific biography, Helge, Kragh. Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 14.Google Scholar
12. On the Theory of Quantum Mechanics, P. A. M., Dirac, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 112, 661–77, 1926.
13. Zur Quantelung des idealen einatomigen Gases, E., Fermi, Zeitschrift für Physik, 36, 902–12, 1926.
14. Ibid., Dirac, Kragh, p. 36.
15. Ibid., Dirac, Kragh, pp. 35–36.
16. On Dense Matter, R. H., Fowler, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 87, 114–22, 1926.
17. The internal constitution of the stars, A. S., Eddington, Cambridge University Press, 1926, Section 117.Google Scholar
18. The Limiting Density in White Dwarf Stars, Edmund C., Stoner, Philosophical Magazine, 7, 63–70, 1929.
19. Über die Grenzdichte der Materie und der Energie, Wilhelm, Anderson, Zeitschrift für Physik, 54, 851–56, 1929.
20. Autobiography, S., Chandrasekhar, in Les Prix Nobel, The Nobel Prizes 1983, Editor Wilhelm, Odelberg, Nobel Foundation, Stockholm, 1984.Google Scholar
21. The Highly Collapsed Configurations of a Stellar Mass, S., Chandrasekhar, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 91, 456–66, 1931.
22. The Density of White Dwarf Stars, S., Chandrasekhar, Philosophical Magazine, Series 7, 11, 592–96, 1931.
23. The Maximum Mass of Ideal White Dwarfs, S., Chandrasekhar, Astrophysical Journal, 74, 81–82, 1931.
24. Ibid. The Highly Condensed … Chandrasekhar, see p. 463.
25. Possible Existence of a Neutron, J., Chadwick, Nature, 129, 312, 1932.
26. The Physical State of Matter in the Interior of Stars, S., Chandrasekhar, The Observatory, 57, 93–99, 1934.
27. A two-solar-mass neutron star measured using Shapiro delay, P. B., Demorest, et al., Nature, 467, 1081–83, 2010.
28. On the Theory of Stars, L., Landau, Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion, 1, 285–88, 1932.
29. Origin of Stellar Energy, L., Landau, Nature, 141, 333–34, 1938.
30. The Highly Collapsed Configurations of a Stellar Mass. (Second Paper.), S., Chandrasekhar, Monthly Notices ofthe Royal Astronomical Society, 95, 207–25, 1935.
31. The Minimum Pressure of a Degenerate Electron Gas, Edmund C., Stoner, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 92, 651–61, 1932.
32. Upper Limits for Densities and Temperatures in Stars, Edmund C., Stoner, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 92, 662–76, 1932.
33. Chandrasekhar vs. Eddington – an unanticipated confrontation, Kameshwar C., Wali, Physics Today, 35, 33–40, October 1982.
34. S., Chandrasekhar, The Observatory, 58, 37, 1935.
35. Stellar Configurations with Degenerate Cores, S., Chandrasekhar, The Observatory, 57, 373–77, 1934.
36. Response to Chandrasekhar, Arthur, Eddington Sir, The Observatory, 58, 37–39, 1935.
37. The Observatory, 58, 37–39, 1935.
38. Ibid., Chandrasekhar vs. Eddington, Wali, pp. 37–40.
39. An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure, S., Chandrasekhar, University of Chicago Press, 1939; Mineola, NY: Dover Publications 1957.Google Scholar
40. On a Stationary System with Spherical Symmetry Consisting of Many Gravitating Masses, Albert, Einstein, Annals of Mathematics, 40, 922–36, 1939.
41. The Observatory, 58, 37–39, 1935.
42. Ibid., Edmund C. Stoner, Nauenberg.
43. The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes, S., Chandrasekhar, Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
44. Ibid., The internal constitution of the stars, A. S. Eddington, Cambridge University Press, 1926.
45. Ibid., On Dense Matter, Fowler, 1926.
46. Subtle is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein, Abraham, Pais, Oxford University Press, 1982, p. 463.Google Scholar
47. Sir Arthur Stanley, Eddington O.M., F.R.S., G., Temple, The Observatory, 66, 7–10, 1945.
48. Fundamental Theory, A. S., Eddington, Cambridge University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
49. Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin – An autobiography and other recollections edited by Katherine, Haramundanis, Cambridge, 1984, pp. 203 and 120.
50. On the Stability of Stellar Neutron Cores, J. R., Oppenheimer & Robert, Serber, Physical Review, 54, 540, 1938.
51. On Massive Neutron Cores, J. R., Oppenheimer & G. M., Volkoff, Physical Review, 55, 374–81, 1939.
52. Static Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations for Spheres of Fluid, Richard C., Tolman, Physical Review, 55, 364–73, 1939.
53. On Continued Gravitational Contraction, J. R., Oppenheimer & H., Snyder, Physical Review, 56, 455–59, 1939.
54. Ibid., On Stationary Systems, Einstein.
55. Ibid., Black Holes and Time Warps, Thorne, pp. 135–37.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×