Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes
- Table of Council of Europe Instruments
- Table of Other Council of Europe Materials
- Table of European Union Instruments
- Table of Other European Union Materials
- Table of Other Materials
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Human–Robot Interactions and Substantive Law
- Part II Human–Robot Interactions and Procedural Law
- 5 Introduction to Human–Robot Interaction and Procedural Issues in Criminal Justice
- 6 Human Psychology and Robot Evidence in the Courtroom, Alternative Dispute Resolution, and Agency Proceedings
- 7 Principles to Govern Regulation of Digital and Machine Evidence
- 8 Robot Testimony?
- 9 Digital Evidence Generated by Consumer Products
- 10 Data as Evidence in Criminal Courts
- 11 Reconsidering Two US Constitutional Doctrines
- Part III Human–Robot Interactions and Legal Narrative
- Index
11 - Reconsidering Two US Constitutional Doctrines
Fourth Amendment Standing and the State Agency Requirement in a World of Robots
from Part II - Human–Robot Interactions and Procedural Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 October 2024
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes
- Table of Council of Europe Instruments
- Table of Other Council of Europe Materials
- Table of European Union Instruments
- Table of Other European Union Materials
- Table of Other Materials
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Human–Robot Interactions and Substantive Law
- Part II Human–Robot Interactions and Procedural Law
- 5 Introduction to Human–Robot Interaction and Procedural Issues in Criminal Justice
- 6 Human Psychology and Robot Evidence in the Courtroom, Alternative Dispute Resolution, and Agency Proceedings
- 7 Principles to Govern Regulation of Digital and Machine Evidence
- 8 Robot Testimony?
- 9 Digital Evidence Generated by Consumer Products
- 10 Data as Evidence in Criminal Courts
- 11 Reconsidering Two US Constitutional Doctrines
- Part III Human–Robot Interactions and Legal Narrative
- Index
Summary
Modern interactions between humans and robots challenge our conceptions of self, privacy, and society, stretching the capacities of legal regimes to preserve autonomy, intimacy, and democratic governance. Where should we look for normative and legal guidance? One possibility in the US context is the Fourth Amendment. Unfortunately, rules governing “standing” and the state agency requirement limit the Amendment’s potential to protect core norms in these rapidly evolving contexts. This chapter argues that the text, history, and philosophical lineage of the Fourth Amendment favor a broader understanding of who can bring Fourth Amendment challenges and whose conduct should be subject to Fourth Amendment regulation. This reading dramatically enhances the Amendment’s role in efforts to understand, regulate, and protect human–robot interactions.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human–Robot Interaction in Law and Its NarrativesLegal Blame, Procedure, and Criminal Law, pp. 253 - 278Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
- Creative Commons
- This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/