Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes
- Table of Council of Europe Instruments
- Table of Other Council of Europe Materials
- Table of European Union Instruments
- Table of Other European Union Materials
- Table of Other Materials
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Human–Robot Interactions and Substantive Law
- 1 The Challenges of Human–Robot Interaction for Substantive Criminal Law
- 2 Are Programmers in or out of Control?
- 3 Trusting Robots
- 4 Forms of Robot Liability
- Part II Human–Robot Interactions and Procedural Law
- Part III Human–Robot Interactions and Legal Narrative
- Index
1 - The Challenges of Human–Robot Interaction for Substantive Criminal Law
Mapping the Field
from Part I - Human–Robot Interactions and Substantive Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 October 2024
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes
- Table of Council of Europe Instruments
- Table of Other Council of Europe Materials
- Table of European Union Instruments
- Table of Other European Union Materials
- Table of Other Materials
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Human–Robot Interactions and Substantive Law
- 1 The Challenges of Human–Robot Interaction for Substantive Criminal Law
- 2 Are Programmers in or out of Control?
- 3 Trusting Robots
- 4 Forms of Robot Liability
- Part II Human–Robot Interactions and Procedural Law
- Part III Human–Robot Interactions and Legal Narrative
- Index
Summary
This introduction lays out various aspects concerning robots' entanglement with substantive law, including an all-round view of the criminal liability of humans for robots, the criminal responsibility of robots themselves, self-defense against robots, and robots as victims of crime. While Janneke de Snaijer and Marta Bo in their chapter discuss specific aspects of criminal liability and exemptions therefrom, Thomas Weigend analyzes the looming “responsibility gap” and the option of expanding the idea of corporate criminal responsibility to cover harm caused by AI devices. This is one aspect of a preventive, repressive, and long-term perspective on how criminal law can shape human–robot interaction, but also possibly an example of how the wish to regulate robots could affect criminal law itself.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human–Robot Interaction in Law and Its NarrativesLegal Blame, Procedure, and Criminal Law, pp. 5 - 22Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
- Creative Commons
- This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/