Book contents
- Humane Professions
- Humane Professions
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Experior
- 1 Darwin’s Compromise
- 2 Medical Monsters?
- 3 Of Laboratories and Legislatures
- 4 Paget’s Public
- 5 Cannon Fire
- Epilogue: Humanity and Human Experimentation
- Select Bibliography
- Index
3 - Of Laboratories and Legislatures
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2021
- Humane Professions
- Humane Professions
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Experior
- 1 Darwin’s Compromise
- 2 Medical Monsters?
- 3 Of Laboratories and Legislatures
- 4 Paget’s Public
- 5 Cannon Fire
- Epilogue: Humanity and Human Experimentation
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Summary
If antivivisection was alive in America before the mid-1880s, it had very little to aim at. Slowly, that changed, and from the outset, American antivivisectionists targeted both state and federal legislation as the most likely way to generate support and to secure change. Medical scientists, and Henry P. Bowditch chief among them, found themselves having to work beyond the laboratory, making a case for laboratory work in the legislature. This chapter details the early defence of experiment in the United States in Massachusetts, New York and Washington, DC.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Humane ProfessionsThe Defence of Experimental Medicine, 1876–1914, pp. 80 - 102Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021