Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:31:30.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2024

Chiara Bozzone
Chiara Bozzone
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Homer's Living Language
Formularity, Dialect, and Creativity in Oral-Traditional Poetry
 , pp. 239 - 265
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, David. 2003. Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agazzi, Pierangelo and Vilardo, Massimo. 2002. Ἑλληνιστί: Grammatica della lingua greca. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Aguirre, Javier and Lavilla de Lera, Jonathan. 2018. ‘The philosopher against the rhapsodist: Socrates and Ion as characters in Plato’s Ion’, Filozofia 73: 108–18.Google Scholar
Akande, Akinmade T. 2012. ‘The appropriation of African American vernacular English and Jamaican patois by Nigerian hip hop artists’, Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 60: 237–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albright, Adam and Hayes, Bruce. 2003. ‘Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study’, Cognition 90: 119–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alim, Samy H. 2002. ‘Street-conscious copula variation in the hip hop nation’, American Speech 77: 288–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Rutger. 2021. ‘From Fränkel to functional: A functional-cognitive approach to enjambment and caesura’. Paper presented at the 14th Trends in Classics International Conference, March 2021, University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Allen, Nick. 2012. ‘Americans baffled by Adele’s accent’, The Telegraph, February 13, 2012. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/rockandpopmusic/9079988/Grammy-Awards-Americans-baffled-by-Adeles-accent.htmlGoogle Scholar
Allen, Sidney W. 1968. Vox Graeca: A Guide to the Pronunciation of Classical Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Thomas W. 1907. ‘The Homeridae’, The Classical Quarterly 1: 135–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Thomas W. 1931. Homeri Ilias. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Øivind and Haug, Dag T. T. (eds.). 2012. Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, John R. 1983. ‘A spreading activation theory of memory’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22: 261–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anson, Edward M. 2009. ‘Greek ethnicity and the Greek language’, Glotta 85: 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Eduard Vernon. 1905. Vedic Metre in its Historical Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A. and Baltazani, M. 2000. ‘GREEK ToBI: a system for the annotation of Greek speech corpora’, in Gavrilidou, M., Carayannis, G., Markantonatou, S., Piperidis, S., and Stainhauer, G. (eds.), Proceedings of Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation 2, 555–62. Athens: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald and Schreuder, Robert. 1995. ‘Modeling morphological processing’, in Feldman, L. B. (ed.) Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, 131–54. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bachvarova, Mary R. 2016. From Hittite to Homer: The Anatolian Background of Ancient Greek Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, Alan, Eysenck, Michael W., and Anderson, Michael C. 2009. Memory. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Bailey, Derek. 1992. Improvisation, its Nature and Practice in Music. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, Egbert J. 1990. ‘Homeric discourse and enjambement: A cognitive approach’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 120: 1–21.Google Scholar
Bakker, Egbert J. 1997. Poetry in Speech. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, Egbert J. 2005. Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, Egbert J. 2013. The Meaning of Meat and the Structure of the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Egbert. 2019. ‘Learning the epic formula’, in Reitz, C. and Finkmann, S. (eds.), Structures of Epic Poetry, Volume I: Foundations, 81–98. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Harry R. 1979. ‘Enjambement and oral composition’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 109: 1–10.Google Scholar
Barnes, Harry R. 1986. ‘The colometric structure of Homeric hexameter’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 27.2: 125–50.Google Scholar
Barnes, Timothy. 2011. ‘Homeric ΑΝΔΡΟΤΗΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΗΒΗΝ’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 131: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnie, John. 1978. ‘Oral formulas in the country blues’, Southern Folklore Quarterly 42: 39–52.Google Scholar
Bassett, Samuel Eliot. 1919. ‘The theory of the Homeric caesura according to the extant remains of the ancient doctrine’, The American Journal of Philology 40.4: 343–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 2009. ‘“You’re not from New York City, you’re from Rotherham”: Dialect and identity in British indie music’, Journal of English Linguistics 37.3: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, W., Abrahamsen, A., and Graham, G. 2001. ‘Cognitive science: History’ in Smelser, Neil J. and Baltes, Paul B. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2154–58. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Deborah. 2005. Homeric Conversation. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Beck, Deborah. 2012. Speech Presentation in Homeric Epic. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Beck, William. 1986. ‘Choice and context: Metrical doublets for Hera’, The American Journal of Philology 107: 480–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary. 1986. Stress and Non-Stress Accent. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan and Gibson, Andy M. 2011. ‘Staging language: An introduction to the sociolinguistics of performance’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 15: 555–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, John. 1997. ‘Homer and the Bronze Age’, in Morris, Ian and Powell, Barry (eds.) A New Companion to Homer, 511–34. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan. 2012. ‘Foot-conditioned phonotactics and prosodic constituency’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Berg, Nils. 1978. ‘Parergon metricum: der Ursprung des griechischen Hexameters’, Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 37: 11–36.Google Scholar
Blanc, Alain. 2008. Les contraintes métriques dans la poésie homérique: L’emploi des thèmes nominaux sigmatiques dans l’hexamètre dactylique, Louvain-Paris: Editions Peeters.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Böckh, August. 1811–1821. Pindari operae quae supersunt. Weigel: Leipzig.Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret. 1990. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London: George Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret. 1998. ‘Creativity and artificial intelligence’, Artificial Intelligence 103: 347–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, Margaret. 2004. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, 2nd edition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, Margaret. 2006. Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret. 2009. ‘Computer models of creativity’, AI Magazine Fall 2009: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1976. ‘Meaning and memory’, Forum Linguisticum 1: 1–14.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. Maurice. 1952. Heroic Poetry. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bozzone, Chiara. 2010. ‘New perspectives on formularity’, in Jamison, Stephanie W., Melchert, H. Craig, and Vine, Brent (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, 27–44. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Bozzone, Chiara. 2014. ‘Constructions: A new approach to formularity, discourse, and syntax in Homer’. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bozzone, Chiara. 2016a. ‘Weaving songs for the dead in Indo-European: Women poets, funerary laments, and the ecology of *k̑léu̯os’, in Goldstein, David M., Jamison, Stephanie W., and Vine, Brent (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, 1–22. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Bozzone, Chiara. 2016b. ‘The mind of the poet: Linguistic and cognitive perspectives’, in Gallo, Federico (ed.), Omero: quaestiones disputatae, 79–105. Milano: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Bozzone, Chiara. 2020. ‘Reconstructing the PIE causative in cross-linguistic perspective’, Indo-European Linguistics 8: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozzone, Chiara. 2022. ‘Homeric formulas and their antiquity: A constructional study of ἀνδροτῆτα καὶ ἥβην’, Glotta 98: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozzone, Chiara. forthcoming. ‘Homeric constructions, their productivity, and the development of Epic Greek’, in Van Beek, L. (ed.), Language Change in Epic Greek and Other Oral Traditions. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bozzone, Chiara and Guardiano, Cristina. 2015. ‘Adnominal ὁ ἡ τό in Homer: Tracking the spread of a syntactic innovation’. Paper presented at the Colloquium on Ancient Greek Linguistics, Rome.Google Scholar
Brillante, Carlo. 2009. Il cantore e la Musa. Poesia e modelli culturali nella Grecia arcaica, Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Brown, Anita. 2018. Quantitative Metathesis in Ancient Greek. Unpublished manuscript. https://scholarship.tricolib.brynmawr.edu/bitstream/handle/10066/20029/Brown_thesis_2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Brown, Cat. 2015. ‘Alesha Dixon heckled for singing British national anthem in American accent’, The Telegraph, July 6, 2015. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/music-news/11719110/Alesha-Dixon-heckled-for-singing-England-national-anthem-in-American-accent.htmlGoogle Scholar
Brownstein, Michael. 2014. ‘Rationalizing flow: Agency in skilled unreflective action’, Philosophical Studies 168: 545–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchner, Giorgio and Russo, Carlo Ferdinando. 1955. ‘La coppa di Nestore e un’iscrizione metrica di Pitecussa dell’VIII sec. av. Cr.’, Rendiconti Accademia Lincei 8.10: 215–34.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling. 1955. The Greek Dialects, 2nd edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, Jonathan S. 2001. The Tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the Epic Cycle. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2002. ‘Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure’, in Givón, Talmy and Malle, Bertram F. (eds.), The Evolution of Language out of Pre-Language, 109–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2015. Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerotto, Alberto. 1992. ‘Analisi formulare della Batrachomyomachia’, Lexis 9–10: 1–54.Google Scholar
Cantilena, Mario. 1980. Enjambement e poesia esametrica orale: una verifica. Ferrara: Quaderni del Giornale Filologico Ferrarese.Google Scholar
Cantilena, Mario. 1982. Ricerche sulla dizione epica I- Per uno studio della formularità degli Inni Omerici. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Cantilena, Mario. 1995. ‘Il ponte di Nicanore’, in Fantuzzi, Marco and Pretagostini, Roberto (eds.), Struttura e storia dell’esametro greco I, 9–67. Rome: Gruppo editoriale internazionale.Google Scholar
Cantilena, Mario. 2021. ‘Incertezze sull’esametro’. Paper presented at the Seminario Omerico, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, April 2021.Google Scholar
Cappuccino, Carlotta. 2005. Filosofi e Rapsodi. Testo, traduzione e commento dello Ione platonico. Bologna: CLUEB.Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew. 2013. Syntax: A Generative Introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cassio, Albio Cesare. 1998. ‘La cultura euboica e lo sviluppo dell’epica greca’, in D’Agostino, Bruno and Bats, Michel (eds.), Euboica. L’Eubea e la presenza euboica in Calcidica e in Occidente, 11–22. Naples: Publications du Centre Jean Bérard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassio, Albio Cesare. 2007. ‘Alcman’s text, spoken Laconian, and Greek study of Greek dialects’, in Hajnal, Ivo (ed.), Die altgriechischen Dialekte: Wesen und Werden, 29–45. Innsbrük: Innsbrucker Beiträgen zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Cassio, Albio Cesare. 2009. ‘The language of Hesiod and the Corpus Hesiodeum’, in Montanari, Franco, Tsagalis, Christos, and Rengakos, Antonios (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, 179–201. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassio, Albio Cesare. 2016a. ‘Introduzione Generale’, in Cassio, Albio Cesare (ed.), Storia delle lingue letterarie greche, 2nd edition, 1–136. Firenze: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Cassio, Albio Cesare. 2016b. ‘Overlong syllables in the epic Adonius and the compositional stages of Greek hexameter poetry’, in Gallo, Federico (ed.), Omero: quaestiones disputatae, 31–42. Milano: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Cassola, Filippo. 1975. Inni Omerici. Milano: Arnoldo Mondadori.Google Scholar
Chadwick, John. 1990. ‘The descent of the Greek Epic’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 110: 174–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace G. (ed.). 1980. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace G. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre. 1948. Grammaire homérique. Tome I: Phonétique et morphologie. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre. 1953. Grammaire homérique. Tome II. Syntaxe. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre. 1968–1980 [2009]. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: Histoire des mots, New edition. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Chase, W.G. and Simon, H.A. 1973. ‘The mind’s eye in chess’, in Chase, W.G. (ed.), Visual Information Processing, 215–81. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chirico, Alice, Serino, Silvia, Cipresso, Pietro, Gaggioli, Andrea, and Riva, Giuseppe. 2015. ‘When music “flows”. State and trait in musical performance, composition and listening: A systematic review’, Frontiers in Psychology 6.906: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Boston: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clackson, James. 2011. ‘The social dialects of Latin’, in Clackson, James (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language, 505–26. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Sandra and Hiscock, Philip. 2009. ‘Hip-hop in a post-insular community: Hybridity, local language, and authenticity in an online Newfoundland rap group’, Journal of English Linguistics 37.3: 241–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Čolaković, Zlatan. 2019. ‘Avdo Međedović’s post-traditional epics and their relevance to Homeric studies’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 139: 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cota, Marta. 2006. La ‘metatesi quantitativa’ in Ionico-Attico: alcune recenti teorie. Tesi di Laurea, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas and Jaworski, Adam (eds.). 1997. Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, Nelson. 2001. ‘The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity’, Behavioral Brain Science 24: 84–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croft, William. 1995. ‘Intonation units and grammatical structure’, Linguistics 33: 839–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1975/2000. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Cutler, Cecelia. 2003. ‘“Keepin’ it real”: White hip-hoppers’ discourses of language, race, and authenticity’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 13: 211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Cecelia. 2014. White Hip-hoppers, Language and Identity in Post-Modern America. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danek, Georg. 1988. Epos und Zitat: Studien zu den Quellen der Odyssee. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften [Austrian Academy of Sciences Press].Google Scholar
Danek, Georg and Hagel, Stefan. 2002. ‘Homeric singing: An approach to the original performance’ [webpage]. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. https://www.oeaw.ac.at/kal/sh/Google Scholar
Danek, Georg. 2012. ‘Homer und Avdo Međedović als ‘post-traditional singers’?’ in Brügger, Michael Meier (ed.), Homer, gedeutet durch ein großes Lexikon, 27–44. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauer, Rebecca M. 1980. ‘The reduction of unstressed high vowels in Modern Greek’, Journal of the International Phonetic Association 10: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Destrée, Pierre and Herrmann, Fritz‐Gregor (eds.). 2011. Plato and the Poets. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, Andrew M., and Stephens, Laurence D. 1978. ‘The Greek appositives: Toward a linguistically adequate definition of caesura and bridge’, Classical Philology 73.4: 314–28.Google Scholar
Devine, Andrew M., and Stephens, Laurence D. 1994. The Prosody of Greek Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, Arne. 2003. ‘Functional neuroanatomy of altered states of consciousness: The transient hypofrontality hypothesis’, Consciousness and Cognition 12: 231–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, Arne. 2004a. ‘Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow’, Consciousness and Cognition 13: 746–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, Arne. 2004b. ‘The cognitive neuroscience of creativity’, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11: 1011–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dik, Helma. 1995. Word Order in Ancient Greek: A Pragmatic Account of Word Order Variation in Herodotus. Amsterdam: Gieben.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dik, Helma. 2007. Word Order in Greek Tragic Dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W., and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2007. Word: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John. 1985. ‘Competing motivations’, in Haiman, J. (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 343–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dugan, Kelly Patricia. 2012. ‘A generative approach to Homeric enjambment: Benefits and drawbacks’. M.A. Thesis, University of Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
Duncan, Daniel. 2017. ‘Australian singer, American features: Performing authenticity in country music’, Language and Communication 52: 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durante, Marcello. 1960. ‘Ricerche sulla preistoria della lingua poetica greca: La terminologia relativa alla creazione poetica’, Rendiconti Lincei 15: 231–49.Google Scholar
Dyer, Robert. 1975. ‘The blind bard of Chios (Hymn. Hom. AP. 171–76)’, Classical Philology 7: 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dylan, Bob. 2016. Nobel Lecture. NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/2016/dylan/lecture/Google Scholar
Eberhardt, Maeve and Freeman, Kara 2015. ‘“First things first, I’m the realest”: Linguistic appropriation, white privilege, and the hip–hop persona of Iggy Azalea’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 19.3: 303–27.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. Patrick. 1971. The Language of Hesiod in its Traditional Context. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark W. 1966. ‘Some features of Homeric craftsmanship’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 97: 115–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Mark W. 1986. ‘Homer and oral tradition: The formula, Part I’, Oral Tradition 1/2: 171–230.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark W. 1988. ‘Homer and oral tradition: The formula, Part II’, Oral Tradition 3: 11–60.Google Scholar
Edwards, Viv and Sienkwicz, Thomas J. 1990. Oral Cultures Past and Present: Rappin’ and Homer. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Erman, Britt and Warren, Beatrice. 2000. ‘The idiom principle and the open choice principle’, Text 20: 29–62.Google Scholar
Evans, David. 2007. ‘Formulaic composition in the blues: A view from the field’, The Journal of American Folklore 120: 482–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evanson, Doris Muriel. 1989. Imitation and Inspiration: Aspects of Literary Theory in Early and Middle-Period Platonic Dialogues. M.A. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
Fabb, Nigel. 2015. What is Poetry? Language and Memory in the Poems of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Facchinetti, Roberta (ed.). 2007. Corpus Linguistics 25 Years On. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraone, Christopher A. 1996. ‘Taking the “Nestor’s cup inscription” seriously: Erotic magic and conditional curses in the earliest inscribed hexameters’, Classical Antiquity 15: 77–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud and Fenk, August. 2002. ‘The clausal structure of linguistic and pre-linguistic behavior’, in Givón, Talmy and Malle, Bertram F. (eds.), The Evolution of Language out of Pre-Language, 215–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline. 2017. Intonation and Prosodic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fick, August. 1883. Die homerische Odyssee in der unsprünglichen Sprachform wiederhergestellt. Göttingen: Peppmüller.Google Scholar
Fick, August. 1886. Die homerische Ilias. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, Margalit. 1990. ‘A creative oral poet and the muse’, The American Journal of Philology 111: 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelberg, Margalit. 2012. ‘Late features in the speeches of the Iliad’’, in Andersen, Øivind and Haug, Dag T. T. (eds.), Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry, 80–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth. 1977. Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance, and Social Context. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert. 1957. Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fix, Sonya. 2010. ‘Representations of blackness by white women: Linguistic practice in the community versus the media’, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16.2: 56–65.Google Scholar
Foege, Alec. 1994. ‘Green Day: The kids are alright’, Rolling Stone, September 22, 1994. http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/green-day-the-kids-are-alright-19940922Google Scholar
Foer, Joshua. 2011. Moonwalking with Einstein: The Art and Science of Remembering Everything. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Foley, John Miles. 1991. Immanent Art: From Structure to Meaning in Traditional Oral Epic. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, John Miles. 1999. Homer’s Traditional Art. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, John Miles. 2002. How To Read an Oral Poem. Champaign, IL: Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Andrew. 2002. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forte, Alexander S. W. 2017. ‘Tracing Homeric metaphor’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W. IV. 2010. Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction, 2nd edition. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foster, J. and Lehoux, D. 2007. ‘The Delphic Oracle and the ethylene-intoxication hypothesis’, Clinical Toxicology 451: 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frame, Douglas. 2009. Hippota Nestor. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Fränkel, Hermann. 1926. ‘Der kallimachische und homerische Hexameter’, 1st version, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, philologische-historische Klasse 1–33.Google Scholar
Fränkel, Hermann. 1955. ‘Der homerische und kallimachische Hexameter’, 2nd version, in Tietze, F. (ed.), Wege und Formen frühgriechischen Denkens: Literarische und philosophiegeschichtliche Studien, 100–56. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Friedman, Albert B. 1961. ‘The formulaic improvisation theory of ballad tradition: A counterstatement’, The Journal of American Folklore 292: 113–15.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Rainer. 2000. ‘Homeric enjambement and orality’, Hermes 128: 1–19.Google Scholar
Frog, and Lamb, William. 2022. Weathered Words: Formulaic Language and Verbal Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria, Rodman, Robert, and Hyams, Nina. 2014. An Introduction to Language, 10th edition. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Gablasova, Dana, Brezina, Vaclav, and McEnery, Tony. 2017. ‘Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence’, Language Learning 67.S1: 155–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaunt, Jasper. 2017. ‘Nestor’s cup and its reception’, in Slater, Niall W. (ed.), Voice and Voices in Antiquity, 92–120. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gerber, Douglas E. 1999. Greek Iambic Poetry from the Seventh to the Fifth Centuries BC. Loeb Classical Library 259. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gerfer, Anika. 2018. ‘Global reggae and the appropriation of Jamaican Creole’, World Englishes 37: 668–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getzels, Jacob W. and Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1976. The Creative Vision: A Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Gibson, Andy M. 2019. ‘Sociophonetics of popular music: Insights from corpus analysis and speech perception experiments’. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Gilbert, P. F. C. 2001. ‘An outline of brain function’, Cognitive Brain Research 12: 61–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giles, Howard and Smith, Philip. 1979. ‘Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence’, in Giles, Howard and Clair, Robert N. St. (eds.), Language and Social Psychology, 45–65. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Luke O. 1991. ‘Literacy, orality, and the Parry-Lord “formula”: Improvisation and the Afro-American Jazz tradition’, International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 22: 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2005. Context as Other Minds: The Pragmatics of Sociality, Cognition and Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, Vlad Petre and Kaufman, James C. 2019. ‘Creativity: A historical perspective’, in Kaufman, James C. and Sternberg, Robert J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, 9–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Explain Me This. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, David M. 2014. Classical Greek Syntax: Wackernagel’s Law in Herodotus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Goldstein, David M. 2020. ‘Homeric -phi(n) is an oblique case marker’, Transactions of the Philological Society 118.343–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golston, Chris and Riad, Tomas. 2000. ‘The phonology of Greek meter’, Journal of Linguistics 38: 99–167.Google Scholar
Golston, Chris and Riad, Tomas. 2005. ‘The phonology of Greek lyric meter’, Journal of Linguistics 41: 77–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golston, Chris. 1990. ‘Floating H (and L*) tones in Ancient Greek’, in Meyers, J. and Peréz, P. E. (eds.), Arizona Phonology Conference iii, 66–82. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Linguistics Department.Google Scholar
Golston, Chris. 1991. ‘Both lexicons’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
González, José M. 2013. The Epic Rhapsode and His Craft: Homeric Performance in a Diachronic Perspective. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Graupe, Daniel. 2013. Principles of Artificial Neural Networks, 3rd edition. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, D. H. F. 1947. ‘Homeric epithets for things’, Classical Quarterly 61: 109–21.Google Scholar
Graziosi, Barbara. 2002. Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grethlein, Jonas and Huitnik, Luuk. 2017. ‘Homer’s vividness: An enactive approach’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 137: 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. 2005. ‘Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34: 365–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guardiano, Cristina. 2013. ‘The Greek definite article across time’, Studies in Greek Linguistics 33: 76–91.Google Scholar
Guarducci, Margherita. 2017. L’epigrafia greca dalle origini al tardo impero. Rome: Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato.Google Scholar
Gunkel, Dieter C. 2010. ‘Studies in Greek and Vedic prosody, morphology, and meter’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Gunkel, Dieter C. 2011. ‘The emergence of foot structure as a factor in the formation of Greek verbal nouns in -μα(τ)-’, Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 65: 77–103.Google Scholar
Gunkel, Dieter C. 2014. ‘(Ancient Greek) accentuation’, in Giannakis, Georgios K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, 7–12. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gunkel, Dieter C. and Ryan, Kevin M. 2011. ‘Hiatus avoidance and metrification in the Rigveda’, in Stephanie, W. Jamison, Melchert, H. Craig, and Vine, Brent (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, 53–68. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Gusnard, Debra A., Akbudak, Erbil, Shulman, Gordon L., and Raichle, Marcus E. 2001. ‘Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 98: 4259–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, Gregory R. and Cutler, Cecelia. 2011. ‘Speech style and authenticity: Quantitative evidence for the performance of identity’, Language Variation and Change 23.1: 139–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackstein, Olav. 2002. Die sprachform der homerischen Epen. Faktoren morphologischer Variabilität in literarischen Frühformen, Tradition, Sprachwandel, sprachliche Anachronismen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Hackstein, Olav. 2010. ‘The Greek of epic’, in Bakker, Egbert (ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, 401–23. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hagel, Stefan. 1994. ‘Zu den Konstituenten des griechischen Hexameters’, Wiener Studien 107/108: 77–108.Google Scholar
Hagel, Stefan. 2004. ‘Tables beyond O’Neill’, in Spaltenstein, François and Bianchi, Olivier (eds.), Autour de la césure, 135–215. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hainsworth, John Bryan. 1962. ‘The Homeric formula and the problem of its transmission’, Bulletin of the London Institute of Classical Studies 9: 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainsworth, John Bryan. 1968. The Flexibility of the Homeric Formula. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hainsworth, John Bryan. 1978. ‘Good and bad formulae’, in Fenik, Bernard C. (ed.), Homer: Tradition and Invention, 41–50. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, Ivo. 2003a. Troia aus sprachwissenschaftlicher Sicht. Die Struktur einer Argumentation. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen, Abteilung Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Ivo. 2003b. ‘Der epische Hexameter im Rahmen der Homer-Troia-Debatte’, in Ulf, Christoph (ed.), Der neue Streit um Troia. Eine Bilanz, 217–31. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Hall, Jonathan M. 2000. Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Jonathan M. 2013. A History of the Archaic Greek World, ca. 1200-479 BCE. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Halle, John and Lerdahl, Fred. 1993. ‘A generative textsetting model’, Current Musicology 55: 3–23.Google Scholar
Halliwell, Stephen. 2011. Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hämmig, Anna Elisabeth. 2013. Ny Ephelkystikon. Untersuchung zur Verbreitung und Herkunft des beweglichen Nasals im Griechischen. Hamburg: Baar.Google Scholar
Hansen, P. A. 1983. Carmina Epigraphica Graeca saeculorum VIII-V a.Chr.n. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeselin, David. 2019. ‘Concordance’, Archbook: Architectures of the Book. http://drc.usask.ca/projects/archbook/concordance.phpGoogle Scholar
Haug, Dag T. T. 2002. Les phases de l’évolution de la langue épique: Trois études de linguistique homérique. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haug, Dag T. T. 2012. ‘Tmesis in the epic tradition’, in Andersen, Øivind and Haug, Dag T. T. (eds.), Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry, 96‒105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haug, Dag T. T. and Welo, Eirik. 2001. ‘The proto-hexameter theory: Perspectives for further research’, Symbolae Osloenses 76: 138–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce and Kaun, Abigail. 1996. ‘The role of phonological phrasing in sung and chanted verse’, The Linguistic Review 13: 243–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. ‘The prosodic hierarchy in meter’, in Kiparsky, Paul and Youmans, Gilbert (eds.), Rhythm and Meter, 201–60. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 2009a. Introductory Phonology. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 2009b. ‘Textsetting as constraint conflict’, in Aroui, Jean-Louis and Arleo, Andy (eds.), Towards a Typology of Poetic Forms, 43–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heineman, Kristin. 2010. ‘The chasm at Delphi: A modern perspective’, in Neil O’Sullivan (ed.), Proceedings for the 31st conference of the Australasian Society for Classical Studies. classics.uwa.edu.au/ascs31Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees and Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, Gottfried. 1816. Elementa doctrinae metricae. Glasgow: J. Duncan.Google Scholar
Hess, Mickey. 2005. ‘Hip-hop realness and the white performer’, Critical Studies in Media Communication 22: 372–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higbie, Carolyn. 1990. Measure and Music. Enjambement and Sentence Structure in the Iliad. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higdon, David Leon. 2003. ‘The concordance: Mere index or needful census?’ Text 15: 51–68.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Arie. 1957. ‘Hésiode et la tradition orale’, Mnemosyne 10: 193–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Arie. 1964. Homeric Modifications of Formulaic Prototypes: Studies in the Development of Greek Epic Diction. Amsterdam and London: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry M. 1991. ‘The prosody of the epic Adonius and its prehistory’, Illinois Classical Studies 16: 1–15.Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Høffding, Simon. 2014. ‘What is skilled coping?: Experts on expertise’, Journal of Consciousness Studies 21.9–10: 49–73.Google Scholar
Höfler, Stefan. 2019. ‘Slaying men, or an etymology? Homeric ἀνδρειφόντης’. Paper presented at the conference Indo-European Religion and Poetics, October 11–12, 2019, University of Copenhagen. https://rootsofeurope.ku.dk/kalender/arrangementer-2019/indo-european-religion-and-poetics/handouts/S3T2_H_fler.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hollenbaugh, Ian B. 2020. ‘Augmented reality: A diachronic pragmatic approach to the development of the IE injunctive and augment’. Paper presented at the 39th East Coast Indo-European Conference in Blacksburg, VA. https://ihollenbaugh.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/augmented_reality_a_diachronic_pragmatic.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hollenbaugh, Ian B. 2021. ‘Tense and aspect in Indo-European: A usage-based approach to the verbal systems of the R̥gveda and Homer’. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet and Wilson, Nick. 2017. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, 5th edition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honko, Lauri. 2000. Textualization of Oral Epics. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1987. ‘Emergent grammar’, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 139–57.Google Scholar
Horn, Fabian. 2018. ‘Dying is hard to describe: Metonymies and metaphors of death in the Iliad’, Classical Quarterly 68: 359–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 1997. ‘Homer’s dialect’, in Morris, Ian and Powell, Barry (eds.), A New Companion to Homer, 193–217. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hovav, Malka Rappaport and Levin, Beth. 2008. ‘The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity’, Journal of Linguistics 44: 129–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2009. ‘How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent’, Language Sciences 31: 213–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hytönen-Ng, Elina. 2013. Experiencing ‘Flow’ in Jazz Performance. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Iandoli, Kathy. 2015. “How did Iggy Azalea become the world’s most hated pop star?”, Cosmopolitan, June 1, 2015. https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/news/a41270/iggy-azalea-timeline/Google Scholar
Ingalls, Wayne B. 1970. ‘The structure of the Homeric hexameter: A review’, Phoenix 24.1: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. ‘Linguistics and poetics’, in Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Janko, Richard. 1982. Homer, Hesiod, and the Hymns: Diachronic Development in Epic Diction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janko, Richard. 1992. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume IV: Books 13–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janko, Richard. 2012. ‘πρῶτόν τε καὶ ὕστατον αἰὲν ἀείδειν: Relative chronology and the literary history of the early Greek epos’, in Andersen, Øivind and Haug, Dag T. T. (eds.), Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry, 20‒43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janse, Mark. 2003. ‘The metrical schemes of the Hexameter’, Mnemosyne 56: 343–48.Google Scholar
Janse, Mark. 2021. ‘Phrasing Homer: A cognitive-linguistic approach to Homeric versification’, Symbolae Osloenses 94.1: 2–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Lina and Westphal, Michael. 2017. ‘Rihanna works her multivocal pop persona: A morpho-syntactic and accent analysis of Rihanna’s singing style’, English Today 130: 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jantos, Susanne. 2009. ‘Agreement in educated Jamaican English: A corpus investigation of ICE-Jamaica’. Ph.D. Dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, L. H. 1990. The Local Scripts of Archaic Greece: A Study of the Origin of the Greek Alphabet and its Development from the Eighth to the Fifth Centuries BC. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, I. H., Brooks, D. J., Nixon, P. D., Frackowiak, R. S., and Passingham, R. E. 1994. ‘Motor sequence learning: A study with positron emission tomography’, Journal of Neuroscience 14: 3775–90. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-06-03775.1994CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1988. ‘Freedom and constraint in creativity’, in Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives, 202–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 2002. ‘How jazz musicians improvise’, Music Perception 19: 415–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, James H. 1961. ‘Commonplace and memorization in the oral tradition of the English and Scottish popular ballads’, The Journal of American Folklore 74: 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurek, Thom. 2003. An Untamed Sense of Control. https://www.allmusic.com/album/mw0000019275Google Scholar
Kaczko, Sara. 2018. ‘Faraway so close: Epichoric features and “international” aspirations in Archaic Greek epigram’, Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes XCII: 27–56.Google Scholar
Kahane, Ahuvia. 1994. The Interpretation of Order: A Study in the Poetics of Homeric Repetition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Westminster: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kaufman, James C. and Sternberg, Robert J. 2019. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, B. J. and Gellrich, M. 2002. ‘Improvisation’, in Parncutt, R. and McPherson, G. E. (eds.), The Science and Psychology of Music Performance: Creative Strategies for Teaching and Learning, 117–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keuleers, Emmanuel. 2008. ‘Memory-based learning of inflectional morphology’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1976. ‘Oral poetry: Some linguistic and typological considerations’, in Stolz, Benjamin A. and Shannon, Richard S. III, (eds.), Oral Literature and the Formula, 73–106. Ann Arbor: Center for Coordination of Ancient and Modern Studies.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2005. ‘The Vedic injunctive: Historical and synchronic implications’, in Singh, Rajendra and Bhattacharya, Tanmoy (eds.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics (2005), 219–36. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2017. ‘Formulas and themes’, in Frog, (ed.), Formula: Units of Speech, ‘Words’ of Verbal Art: Working Papers, 155–63. Folkloristiikan toimite 23. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2018. ‘Indo-European origins of the Greek hexameter’, in Gunkel, Dieter and Hackstein, Olav (eds.), Language and Meter, 77–128. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kirk, Geoffrey Stephen. 1966. ‘Studies in some technical aspects of Homeric style: I. The structure of the Homeric hexameter’, Yale Classical Studies 20: 74–152.Google Scholar
Kirk, Geoffrey Stephen. 1976. Homer and the Oral Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, Geoffrey Stephen. 1985. ‘The structural elements of Homeric verse’, in Kirk, Geoffrey Stephen (ed.), The Iliad. A Commentary. Volume I: Books 1–4, 17–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kõiv, Mait. 2011. ‘A note on the dating of Hesiod’, The Classical Quarterly 61: 355–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koniaris, George Leonidas. 1971. ‘Michigan Papyrus 2754 and the Certamen’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 75: 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd and Lunkenheimer, Kerstin. 2012. The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroubo, Dagnini J. 2010. ‘The importance of reggae music in the worldwide cultural universe’, Études caribéennes 16.4740. https://doi.org/10.4000/etudescaribeennes.4740Google Scholar
Kuiper, Koenraad. 1996. Smooth Talkers: The Linguistic Performance of Auctioneers and Sportscasters. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, and Boberg, Charles. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1972. ‘Phonetic prerequisites for a distinctive feature theory’, in Valdman, A. (ed.), Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics in Memory of Pierre Delattre, 273–85. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Turner, Mark. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Andrew T. and Limb, Charles J. 2017. ‘The neuroscience of improvisation’, Music Educators Journal 103: 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Latacz, Joachim. 2011. ‘Zu Homers Person’, in Rengakos, Antonios and Zimmermann, Bernhard (eds.), Homer Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, 1‒25. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Le Page, Robert B. 1978. Projection, Focussing, Diffusion: Or, Steps towards a Sociolinguistic Theory of Language, Illustrated from the Sociolinguistic Survey of Multilingual Communities. Trinidad: Society for Caribbean Linguistics.Google Scholar
Le Page, Robert B. and Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Jamie Shinhee. 2011. ‘Globalization of African American vernacular English in popular culture’, English World–Wide 32: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, Géraldine, Miyata, Yoshiro, and Smolensky, Paul. 1990. ‘Harmonic grammar: A formal multi-level connectionist theory of linguistic well-formedness: Theoretical foundations’, in Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 884–891. Cambridge, MA: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Letts, Don. 2008. Culture Clash: Dread Meets Punk Rockers. London: SAF Publishing.Google Scholar
Limb, Charles J. and Braun, Allen R. 2008. ‘Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI Study of jazz improvisation’, PLoS ONE 32.e1679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Phoebe M.S. 2010. ‘The phonology of formulaic sequences: A review’, in Wood, D. (ed.), Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication, 174–93. New York/London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lin, Phoebe M.S. 2012. ‘Sound evidence: The missing piece in the jigsaw in formulaic language research’, Applied Linguistics 33: 342–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Siyuan et al. 2012. ‘Neural correlates of lyrical improvisation: An fMRI study of freestyle rap’, Scientific Reports 2: 834. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00834CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López-González, M. and Limb, Charles J. 2012. ‘Musical creativity and the brain’, Cerebrum January 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3574774Google Scholar
Lord, Albert Bates. 1960. The Singer of Tales. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lord, Albert Bates. 1968. ‘Homer as oral poet’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 72: 1-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, Albert Bates (ed.). 1974. Serbocroatian Heroic Songs, Volume 3: The Wedding of Smailagić Meho. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lord, Albert Bates. 1991. Epic Singers and Oral Tradition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lundquist, Jesse and Yates, Anthony. 2018. ‘The morphology of Proto-Indo-European’, in Fritz, Matthias, Klein, Jared and Joseph, Brian (eds.),Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An International Handbook of Language Comparison and the Reconstruction of Indo-European, Vol. 3, 2079–195. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lynch, Tosca. 2016. ‘Arsis and Thesis in ancient rhythmics and metrics: A new approach’, The Classical Quarterly 66.2: 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, Paul. 1923. Griechische Metrik. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Maas, Paul. 1962. Greek Metre (Translated by Hugh Lloyd-Jones). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Raymond, Byrne, Charles, and Carlton, Lana. 2006. ‘Creativity and flow in musical composition: An empirical investigation’, Psychology of Music 34: 292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonell, Arthur A. 1916 [1993]. A Vedic Grammar for Students. Delhi: Motilal.Google Scholar
Macdonell, Arthur A. 1926 [1989]. A Sanskrit Grammar for Students. Delhi: Motilal.Google Scholar
Magnelli, Enrico. 1995. ‘Studi recenti sull’origine dell’esametro: un profilo critico’, in Fantuzzi, Marco and Petragostini, Roberto (eds.), Struttura e storia dell’esametro greco II, 111–37. Rome: Gruppo editoriale internazionale.Google Scholar
Mandilaras, Basil. 1992. ‘A new papyrus fragment of the Certamen Homeri et Hesiodi’, in Capasso, Mario (ed.), Papiri letterari greci e latini I, 55–62. Galatina: Congedo.Google Scholar
Martin, Richard P. 1989. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Richard P. 2003. ‘Keens from the absent chorus: Troy to Ulster’, Western Folklore 62.1–2: 119–42.Google Scholar
Martinelli, Maria Chiara. 2001. ‘Da Fränkel a Kahane. Considerazioni sulla divisione in cola dell’esametro omerico’, Gaia 5: 119–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matić, Dejan. 2003. ‘Topic, focus, and discourse structure: Ancient Greek word order’, Studies in Language 27.3: 573–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrorie, Edward. 2004. Homer: The Odyssey. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1920. Aperçu d’une histoire de la langue grecque, 2nd edition. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1923. Les origines indo-européennes des mètres grecs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Meister, Karl. 1921. Die homerische Kunstsprache. Leipzig: Preissschriften der Jablonowskichen Gesellschaft.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méndez Dosuna, Julián Víctor. 1993. ‘Metátesis de cantidad en jónico-ático y heracleota’, Emerita 61: 95–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Christopher. 2016. ‘The Homeric epics and the Anatolian context’, The Classical Review 67.1: 1–3.Google Scholar
Meusel, Eduard. 2020. Pindarus Indogermanicus: Untersuchungen zum Erbe dichtersprachlicher Phraseologie bei Pindar. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Milani, Celestina. 2013. ‘Variation in Mycenaean Greek’, in Giannakis, Georgios K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics. Leiden: Brill. http://dx.doi.org10.1163/2214-448X_eagll_COM_00000363.Google Scholar
Miller, George A. 1956. ‘The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information’, Psychological Review. 63: 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, George A. 2003. ‘The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 141–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minchin, Elizabeth. 2001. Homer and the Resources of Memory: Some Applications of Cognitive Theory to the Iliad and the Odyssey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, Marvin. 1986. The Society of Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Minton, William. 1975. ‘The frequency and structuring of traditional formulas in Hesiod’s Theogony’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 79: 26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monier-Williams, Monier. 1899. A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages, revised by Leumann, E., Cappeller, C., et al. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Marcyliena H. 2001. ‘“Nuthin but a G thang”: Grammar and language ideology in hip-hop identity’, in Lanehart, Sonja L. (ed.), Sociocultural and Historical Contexts of African American English, 187–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, Anna. 2002. ‘The Greek notion of dialect’, in Harrison, Thomas (ed.), Greeks and Barbarians, 153–71. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, David Z. 2015. ‘Iggy Azalea’s minstrel show is imploding’, CL Tampa Bay, January 9, 2015. https://www.cltampa.com/music/article/20760313/iggy-azaleas-minstrel-show-is-implodingGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. F. 1983. ‘“Dream scenes” in Homer, a study in variation’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 113: 39–54.Google Scholar
Morrissey, Franz Andres. 2008. ‘Liverpool to Louisiana in one lyrical line: Style choice in British rock, pop, and folk singing’, in Locher, M. and Strässler, J. (eds.), Standards and Norms in the English Language, 195–220. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, Brian. 2012. ‘Traditional Cockney and popular London speech’, Dialectologia 9: 69–94.Google Scholar
Murray, Penelope. 1981. ‘Poetic inspiration in Early Greece’, The Journal of Hellenic Studies 101: 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Penelope. 1996. Plato on Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Penelope. 2015. ‘Poetic inspiration’, in Destrée, Pierre and Murray, Penelope (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics, First Edition, 158–74. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Nagler, M. N. 1967. ‘Towards a generative view of the Homeric formula’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 98: 269–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Gregory. 1974. Comparative Studies in Greek and Indic Meter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Gregory. 2004. Homer’s Text and Language. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, Gregory. 2009/2010. Homer the Preclassic. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. The 2009 online version is available at http://chs.harvard.edu/publications/. The 2010 print version is published by the University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, Gregory. 2010. The Homer Multitext Project. https://chs.harvard.edu/curated-article/gregory-nagy-the-homer-multitext-project/Google Scholar
Nagy, Gregory. 2011. ‘The Aeolic component of Homeric diction’, in Stephanie, W. Jamison, Melchert, H. Craig, and Vine, Brent (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, 133–75. Bremen: Hempen Verlag. https://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/4138.gregory-nagy-the-aeolic-component-of-homeric-dictionGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, Jeanne and Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 2018. ‘The experience of flow: Theory and research’, in Snyder, C. R., Lopez, Shane J., Edwards, Lisa M., and Marques, Susana C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, 279–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neely, James H. 1977. ‘Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 106.3: 226–54.Google Scholar
Neely, James H. 1991. ‘Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories’, in Besner, Derek and Humphreys, Glyn W. (eds.), Basic Processes in Reading: Visual Word Recognition, 264–336. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina and Vogel, Irene. 1986 [2007]. Prosodic Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina, Shukla, Mohinish, and Mehler, Jacques. 2011. ‘Stress‐timed vs. syllable‐timed languages’, in van Oostendorp, Marc et al. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1147–59. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene Albert. 1946. Morphology: The Descriptive Analysis of Words. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1870. ‘Der Florentinische Tractat über Homer und Hesiod, ihr Geschlecht und ihren Wettkampf’, Rheinisches Museum Für Philologie 25: 528–40.Google Scholar
Nikolaev, Alexander. 2013. ‘The Aorist infinitives in -εειν in early Greek hexameter poetry᾽, Journal of Hellenic Studies 133: 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosowitz, Dan. 2015. ‘I made a linguistics professor listen to a Blink-182 song and analyze the accent’, Atlas Obscura, 18 June 2015. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/i-made-a-linguistics-professor-listen-to-a-blink-182-song-and-analyze-the-accentGoogle Scholar
Notopoulos, James A. 1964. ‘Studies in Early Greek Oral Poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 68: 1–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hanlon, Renae. 2006. ‘Australian hip-hop: A sociolinguistic investigation’, Australian Journal of Linguistics 26: 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Eugene G. Jr. 1942. ‘Localization of metrical word-types in the Greek hexameter’, Yale Classical Studies 8: 105–78.Google Scholar
Pace-Sigge, Michael. 2013. Lexical Priming in Spoken English Usage. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagán Cánovas, Cristóbal. 2020. ‘Learning formulaic creativity: Chunking in verbal art and speech’, Cognitive Semiotics 13.1. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagán Cánovas, Cristóbal and Antović, Mihailo. 2016. ‘Formulaic creativity: Oral poetics and cognitive grammar’, Language and Communication 47: 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Leonard R. 1962. ‘Homeric grammar’, in Wace, Alan J.B. and Stubbings, Frank H. (eds.), A Companion to Homer, 75‒178. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Parker, Holt. 2008. ‘The linguistic case for the Aiolian migration reconsidered’, Hesperia 77: 431–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Adam. 1956. ‘The language of Achilles’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 87: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Milman. 1929. ‘The distinctive character of enjambement in Homeric verse’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 60: 200–20.Google Scholar
Parry, Milman. 1932. ‘The Homeric language as the language of an oral poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 43: 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Milman. 1971. The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parry, Richard. 2020. ‘Episteme and techne’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/episteme-techne/Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 1998. Patterns and Meanings: Using Corpora for English Language Research and Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passa, Enzo. 2016a. ‘L’epica’, in Cassio, Albio Cesare (ed.), Storia delle lingue letterarie greche, 139–96. Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Passa, Enzo. 2016b. ‘L’elegia e l’epigramma su pietra’, in Cassio, Albio Cesare (ed.), Storia delle lingue letterarie greche, 260–88. Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Pavese, Carlo Odo. 1972. Tradizioni e generi poetici della Grecia arcaica. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Pavese, Carlo Odo 1996. ‘La iscrizione sulla kotyle di Nestor da Pithekoussai’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 114: 1–23.Google Scholar
Pavese, Carlo Odo 2014. La metrica e l’esecuzione dei generi poetici tradizionali orali nell’Ellade antica. Trieste: EUT.Google Scholar
Pavese, Carlo Odo and Boschetti, Federico. 2003. A Complete Formulaic Analysis of the Homeric Poems. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Pavese, Carlo Odo and Venti, Paolo. 2000. A Complete Formular Analysis of the Hesiodic Poems. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew and Syder, Frances Hodgetts. 1983. ‘Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency’, in Richards, Jack C. and Schmidt, Richard W. (eds.), Language and Communication, 191–225. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Peabody, Berkley. 1975. The Winged Word: A Study in the Technique of Ancient Greek Oral Composition as Seen Principally through Hesiod’s Works and Days. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, Marcus. 2010. Boden and Beyond: The Creative Mind and its Reception in the Academic Community. http://webprojects.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/marcusp/notes/boden.pdfGoogle Scholar
Peters, Martin. 1986. ‘Zur Frage einer “achäischen” Phase des griechischen Epos’, in Etter, Annemarie (ed.), O-o-pe-ro-si Festschrift für Ernst Risch zum 75. Geburtstag, 303–19. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1994 The Language Instinct. New York: William Morrow and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, H. M. 1951. ‘The early Greek hexameter’, Yale Classical Studies 12: 3–63.Google Scholar
Pressing, Jeff. 1987. ‘Improvisation: Methods and models’, in Sloboda, J. (ed.), Generative Processes in Music: The Psychology of Performance, Improvisation, and Composition, 129–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan and Smolensky, Paul. 2008. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Probert, Philomen. 2003. A New Short Guide to the Accentuation of Ancient Greek. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 1995. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rau, Jeremy. 2010. ‘Greek and Proto-Indo-European’, in Bakker, Egbert J. (ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, 171–88. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Read, John and Nation, Paul. 2004. ‘Measurement of formulaic sequences’, in Schmitt, Norbert (ed.), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use, 23–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ready, Jonathan and Tsagalis, Christos. 2018. Homer in Performance: Rhapsodes, Narrators, and Characters. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ready, Jonathan. 2019. Orality, Textuality, and the Homeric Epics: An Interdisciplinary Study of Oral Texts, Dictated Texts, and Wild Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, Michael David. 1973. ‘The language of Achilles’, The Classical Quarterly 23: 193–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renberg, Gil H. 2017. Where Dreams May Come: Incubation Sanctuaries in the Greco-Roman World. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Renehan, Robert. 1971. ‘The Michigan Alcidamas-Papyrus: A problem in methodology’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 75: 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritschl, Friedrich. 1838. Die Alexandrinischen Bibliotheken unter den ersten Ptolemäern und die Sammlung der Homerischen Gedichte durch Pisistratus nach Anleitung eines Plautinischen Scholions. Nebst litterar- historischen Zugaben über die Chronologie der alexandrinischen Bibliothekare, die Stichometrie der Alten, und die Grammatiker Heliodorus. Breslau: Georg Philipp Aderholz.Google Scholar
Ritter, Simone M., Abbing, Jens, and van Schie, Hein T. 2018. ‘Eye-closure enhances creative performance on divergent and convergent creativity tasks’, Frontiers of Psychology 9: 1315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01315CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rix, Helmut. 1976. Historische Grammatik des Griechischen: Laut- und Formenlehre. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Rose, C. Brian. 2008. ‘Separating fact from fiction in the Aiolian migration’, Hesperia 77: 399–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Luigi Enrico. 2020. ‘Anceps: vocale, sillaba, elemento’, in Colesanti, Giulio and Nicolai, Roberto (eds.), Scritti editi e inediti: Vol. 1: Metrica e Musica, 125–39. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, David. 1995. Memory in Oral Traditions: The Cognitive Psychology of Epic, Ballads, and Counting-Out Rhymes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, David E. and McClelland, James L. 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, Mark and Jaeger, Garrett J. 2012. ‘The standard definition of creativity’, Creativity Research Journal 24: 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, Joseph. 1966. ‘The structural formula in the Homeric verse’, Yale Classical Studies 20: 217–40.Google Scholar
Ryan, Kevin M. 2011. ‘Gradient syllable weight and weight universals in quantitative metrics’, Phonology 28.3: 413–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Kevin M. 2013. ‘Against final indifference’. Paper presented at M@90: Metrical Structure: Meter, Text-Setting, and Stress, MIT. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHS2J6w4Wwc&t=1477sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Kevin M. 2016. ‘Phonological weight’, Language & Linguistics Compass 10: 720–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Kevin M. 2019. Prosodic Weight: Categories and Continua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Kevin M. 2022. ‘Syllable weight and natural duration in textsetting popular music in English’, English Language and Linguistics 26.3: 559–82 https://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~kevinryan/Papers/ryan_2021_textsetting_draft.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sale, Mary Merritt. 1996. ‘In defense of Milman Parry: Renewing the oral theory’, Oral Tradition 11.2: 374–417.Google Scholar
Sandell, Ryan P. 2015. ‘Productivity in historical linguistics: Computational perspectives on word-formation in Ancient Greek and Sanskrit’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Sandell, Ryan P. 2019. ‘The place of Attic-Ionic Greek in word-level prosodic typology’. Paper presented at the conference New Ways of Analyzing Ancient Greek 1, 13–14 December 2019, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Sartwell, Crispin. 1998. Act Like You Know: African-American Autobiography and White Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sauzet, Paul. 1989. ‘L’ accent du grec ancien et les relations entre structure métrique et représentation autosegmentale’, Langages 24: 81‒113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, Keith. 1992. ‘Improvisational creativity: An analysis of jazz performance’, Creativity Research Journal 5: 253–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, Keith. 2011. ‘The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review’, Creativity Research Journal 23: 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, Matthew. 2016. ‘The Aeolic dialects of Ancient Greek: A study in historical dialectology and linguistic classification’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Carl Eduard. 1885. Parallel- Homer, oder, Index aller homerischen Iterati in lexikalischer Anordnung. Göttingen : Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Norbert, Grandage, Sarah, and Adolphs, Svenja. 2004. ‘Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid?’ in Schmitt, Norbert (ed.), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing, and Use, 127–51. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, Wilhelm Emil. 1892. Quaestiones Epicae. Gütersloh: C. Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1980. ‘Prosodic domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited’, in Aronoff, Mark and Kean, Mary-Louise (eds.), Juncture: A Collection of Original Papers, 107–30. Saratoga CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 2011. ‘The syntax-phonology interface’, in Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason and Yu, Alan (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd edition, 435–84. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A. M. 2015. ‘Prestructuralist and structuralist approaches to syntax’, in Kiss, Tibor and Alexiadou, Artemis (eds.), Syntax – Theory and Analysis: An International Handbook, 134–57. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shipp, George Pelham. 1972. Studies in the Language of Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, D.J. and Chabris, C.F. 1999. ‘Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events’, Perception 28.9: 1059–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, Paul. 1999. ‘Language, culture and identity: With (another) look at accents in pop and rock singing’, Multilingua 18.4: 343–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sisario, Ben, Alter, Alexandra, and Chan, Sewell. 2013. ‘Bob Dylan wins Nobel Prize, redefining boundaries of literature’, The New York Times, October 13, 2013. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/14/arts/music/bob-dylan-nobel-prize-literature.htmlGoogle Scholar
Skafte Jensen, Minna. 2011. Writing Homer. A Study Based on Results from Modern Fieldwork. Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab.Google Scholar
Skelton, Christina. 2017. ‘Greek-Anatolian language contact and the settlement of Pamphylia’, Classical Antiquity 36.1: 104–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloboda, John A. 1986. The Musical Mind: The Cognitive Psychology of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolensky, Paul and Legendre, Géraldine. 2006. The Harmonic Mind: From Neural Computation to Optimality-Theoretic Grammar (Cognitive Architecture), Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Solmsen, Felix. 1901 [2019]. Untersuchungen zur griechischen Laut-und-Verslehre. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiller, Henry, de Boer, Jella, Hale, John R., and Chanton, Jeffery. 2008. ‘Gaseous emissions at the site of the Delphic Oracle: Assessing the ancient evidence’,Clinical Toxicology 46.5: 487–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steriade, Donca. 1988. ‘Greek accent: A case for preserving structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 19.2: 271–314.Google Scholar
Stevens, Jenny. 2013. ‘Alex Turner reacts to Glastonbury accent comments’, NME, June 29, 2013. http://www.nme.com/news/music/arctic-monkeys-171-1264151#LeLy8v5OB8uwVcVb.99Google Scholar
Stewart, Edmund. 2016. ‘Professionalism and the poetic persona in Archaic Greece’, The Cambridge Classical Journal 62: 200–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strunk, Klaus. 1957. Die sogenannten Äolismen der homerischen Sprache. Inaugural-Dissertation, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2017. ‘Variationist approaches to the influence of the media on language’, in Perrin, D. and Cotter, C. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sudnow, David. 1978 1, 2001. Ways of the Hand, 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2004. ‘Rural southern white accents’, in Schneider, Edgar W. et al. (ed.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, 1: Phonology, 300–24. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thompson, Rupert J. E. 1999. ‘Instrumentals, datives, locatives and ablatives: The -ϕι case form in Mycenaean and Homer’, The Cambridge Classical Journal 44: 219–250.Google Scholar
Thompson, Stith. 1955–58. Motif-Index of Folk-Literature: A Classification of Narrative Elements in Folk-Tales, Ballads, Myths, Fables, Mediaeval Romances, Exempla, Fabliaux, Jest-Books, and Local Legends. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde and Bagger.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Michael T. 2014. ‘Strummer, Joe [real name John Graham Mellor]’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/88710Google Scholar
Thumb, Albert and Kieckers, Ernst. 1932. Handbuch der griechischen Dialekte I. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Thumb, Albert and Scherer, A. 1959. Handbuch der griechischen Dialekte II. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Tichy, Eva. 1981. ‘Hom. ἀνδροτῆτα und die Vorgeschichte des daktylischen Hexameters’, Glotta 59: 28–67.Google Scholar
Tichy, Eva. 2022. Ilias diachronica Alpha. https://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/fedora/objects/freidok:223894/datastreams/FILE1/contentGoogle Scholar
Tigersted, E. N. 1970. ‘Furor Poeticus: Poetic inspiration in Greek literature before Democritus and Plato’, Journal of the History of Ideas 31: 163–78.Google Scholar
Tolkien, John Ronald Reuel. 2006. The Monsters and the Critics and Other Essays. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2009. ‘The usage-based theory of language acquisition’, in Bavin, Edith L. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language, 69–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topintzi, Nina. 2010. Onsets: Suprasegmental and Prosodic Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1983. ‘Acts of conflicting identity: The sociolinguistics of British pop-song pronunciation’, in Trudgill, Peter (ed.), On Dialect: Social and Geographical Perspectives, 141–60. Oxford: Blackwell. Reprinted as: Trudgill, Peter. 1997. ‘Acts of conflicting identity: The sociolinguistics of British pop-song pronunciation’, in Nikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski (eds.), Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook, 251–66. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ustinova, Yulia. 2017. Divine Mania: Alteration of Consciousness in Ancient Greece. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaidya, Avinash R., Pujara, Maia S., Petrides, Michael, Murray, Elisabeth A., and Fellows, Lesley K. 2019. ‘Lesion studies in contemporary neuroscience’, Trends in Cognitive Science 23: 653–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Beek, Lucien. 2022. The Reflexes of Syllabic Liquids in Ancient Greek: Linguistic Prehistory of the Greek Dialects and Homeric Kunstsprache. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rooy, Raf. 2016. ‘What is a “dialect”? Some new perspectives on the history of the term διάλεκτος and its interpretations in ancient Greece and Byzantium’, Glotta 92: 244–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venti, Paolo. 1991. ‘Per un’indagine sulla formularità dello Scudo di Herakles’, Lexis 7/8: 26–71.Google Scholar
Vergados, Athanassios. 2009. ‘Penelope’s fat hand reconsidered (Odyssey 21,6)’, Wiener Studien 122: 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Edzard. 1987. Homerische Versifikationstechnik: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Visser, Edzard. 1988. ‘Formulae or single words? Towards a new theory of oral verse-making’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 14: 21–37.Google Scholar
Von der Mühll, Peter. 1962. Odyssea/Homerus, 3rd edition. Basel: Helbing and Lichtenhahn.Google Scholar
Wachter, Rudolf. 2007. ‘Greek dialects and epic poetry: Did Homer have to be an Ionian?’ in Hatzopoulos, Miltiades B. and Psilakakou, Vassiliki (eds.)· Actes du Ve Congrès International de Dialectologie Grecque, 317‒28. Paris: Diffusion de Boccard.Google Scholar
Wachter, Rudolf. 2010. ‘Inscriptions’, in Bakker, Egbert J. (ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, 47–61. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob. 1924. Vorlesungen über Syntax mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch. Basel: Philologisches Seminar der Universität Basel.Google Scholar
Wanta, Wayne and Meggett, Dawn. 1988. ‘“Hitting playdirt”: Capacity theory and sports announcers’ use of clichés’, Journal of Communication 38: 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Natasha and Arai, Takayuki. 2001. ‘Japanese mora-timing: A review’, Phonetica 58: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wathelet, Paul. 1981. ‘La langue homérique et le rayonnement littéraire de l’Eubée’, L’Antiquité Classique 50: 819–33.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1976. ‘Observations on the “Nestor’s cup” inscription’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 80: 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1995. How to Kill a Dragon: Aspects of Indo-European Poetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Kevin. 2007. ‘Liverpool English’, Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37: 351–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. and Morrissey, Franz Andres. 2019. Language, the Singer and the Song: The Sociolinguistics of Folk Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English. Vol. 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, Kenny. 1996. Effortless Mastery. New Albany, IN: Jamey Aebersold Jazz.Google Scholar
West, Martin Litchfield. 1973. ‘Greek poetry 2000–700 B.C.’, Classical Quarterly 23: 179–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Martin Litchfield. 1982. Greek Metre. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
West, Martin Litchfield. 1988. ‘The rise of the Greek epic’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 108: 151‒72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Martin Litchfield. 1997. ‘Homer’s meter’, in Morris, Ian and Powell, Barry (eds.), A New Companion to Homer, 218–37. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
West, Martin Litchfield. 2007. Indo-European Poetry and Myth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Martin Litchfield. 2011. The Making of the Iliad: Disquisition and Analytical Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Martin Litchfield. 2014. The Making of the Odyssey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Martin Litchfield. 2018. ‘Unmetrical verses in Homer’, in Gunkel, Dieter and Hackstein, Olav (eds.), Language and Meter, 362–79. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
West, Martin Litchfield. 2021. ‘Homeridae’, Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
West, Stephanie. 1994. ‘Nestor’s bewitching cup’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 101: 9–15.Google Scholar
White, John Williams. 1912. The Verse of Greek Comedy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Whitman, Neal. 2010. ‘Prime time for “Imma”’, Behind the Dictionary. https://www.visualthesaurus.com/cm/dictionary/prime-time-for-imma/Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Dan. 2014. ‘Why do rappers put on fake accents?’ Vice, September 9, 2014. https://www.vice.com/en/article/rb9yw6/why-do-rappers-insist-on-putting-on-fake-accentsGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Dan. 2016. ‘We asked a linguist why Alex Turner now sounds like an old cowboy’, Vice, April 8, 2016. https://noisey.vice.com/en_us/article/6x89zn/we-asked-a-linguist-why-alex-turner-now-sounds-like-he-was-born-in-californiaGoogle Scholar
Willi, Andreas. 2002. The Language of Greek Comedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willi, Andreas. 2006. The Languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willi, Andreas. 2018. Origins of the Greek Verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, Kurt. 1913. ‘Homeros’, in Wissowa, Georg and Kroll, Wilhelm (eds.), Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft: neue Bearbeitung VIII, 2188–247. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Witte, Kurt. 1972. Zur homerischen Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Charles. 1982. Kentucky Country: Folk and Country Music of Kentucky. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Wood, Graeme. 2009. ‘The answer, my Friend … Our correspondent makes a pilgrimage to Bob Dylan’s hometown in search of the source of his bizarre accent’, The Atlantic, August 2009. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/08/the-answer-my-friend/307647Google Scholar
Woodard, Roger D. 2008. ‘Greek dialects’, in Woodard, Roger D. (ed.), The Ancient Languages of Europe, 50–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodard, Roger D. 2010. ‘Phonikēia Grammata: An alphabet for the Greek language’, in Bakker, Egbert (ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, 25–46. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, Alison and Perkins, Michael R. 2000. ‘The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model’, Language & Communication 20: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, W.F. 1978. ‘Penelope’s fat hand (Od. 21.6–7)’, Classical Philology 73: 343–44.Google Scholar
Yunis, Harvey. 2011. Plato: Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zanker, Andreas T. 2019. Metaphor in Homer: Time, Speech, and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Chiara Bozzone, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen
  • Book: Homer's Living Language
  • Online publication: 11 April 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009067157.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Chiara Bozzone, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen
  • Book: Homer's Living Language
  • Online publication: 11 April 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009067157.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Chiara Bozzone, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen
  • Book: Homer's Living Language
  • Online publication: 11 April 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009067157.008
Available formats
×