2 - History and Historiography since 1945
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2014
Summary
Historians are as inclined as ever to divide the past into great ages: traditional, premodern, modern, postmodern, colonial, postcolonial, global, feudal, capitalist, et cetera. Historiographers have been particularly attracted to these watersheds. They may claim that inexorable external forces, such as modernization or globalization, break down old certainties and necessitate a new way of writing history appropriate to new times. The shift from social to political history after 1945 and then the cultural turn of the 1990s were both presented in that way. Historiographers may also evoke heroic precursors, great historians, and theoreticians, men and women who possessed privileged insight not only into historical method, but into the very movement of history. The work of these canonical scholars possesses quasi-biblical status, and it must be elucidated and commented upon. Historians sometimes forget to historicize when their own discipline is at stake. A major contention of this essay is that while periodization is unavoidable, one must not reify periods or mistake chronological categorization for explanation.
It would be unfair to charge historians with ignorance of the problems of these ways of writing history. In 1947, Sir Maurice Powicke wittily dismissed teleologies thus:
To track down every nerve in the body politic and locate each impulse, as though they carried some secret message, is as futile as to read the rivulets that compose the upmost reaches of the Thames as a foresight of the wharves and shipping in the spacious estuary.
(Powicke 1947, p. 340, cited in Bentley 2005, p. 113)- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Historiography of the Modern Social Sciences , pp. 29 - 61Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
1984. “Gandhi as Mahatma: Gorakhpur District, Eastern UP, 1921–2,” Subaltern Studies 3:1–61.Google Scholar
1998. “The Historian as Inquisitor: The Ethics of Interrogating Subaltern Voices,” Rethinking History 2.3:379–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990. “The ‘Masses’ in Weber’s Political Sociology,” Economy and Society 19.2:242–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. More Than a Historian: The Political and Economic Thought of Charles A. Beard, New York: Transaction.Google Scholar
et al. 2006. “AHR Conversation: On Transnational History,” The American Historical Review 111.5:1441–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1913. An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
1996. Ale, Beer and Brewsters in England: Women’s Work in a Changing World, 1300–1600. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Google Scholar
2005. Modernizing England’s Past: English Historiography in the Age of Modernism, 1870–1970. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Google Scholar
1997. The Search for Normality: National Identity and Historical Consciousness in Germany Since 1800. Leamington Spa: Berg.Google Scholar
2010. “Comparative History.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. , , and . London: Bloomsbury, 161–79.Google Scholar
, , and , eds. 1999. Europe since 1800: Writing National Histories. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1969. A Behavioral Approach to Historical Analysis. New York and London: CollierMacmillan.Google Scholar
2008. “Gender as Question of Historical Analysis,” Gender and History 20.3:558–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton,NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press.Google Scholar
1988. “‘Discipline History’ and ‘Intellectual History’: Reflections on the Historiography of the Social Sciences in Britain and France,” Revue de synthèse 109.3–4:387–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. “The Reception of Michel Foucault’s Ideas on Social Discipline, Mental Asylums, Hospitals and the Medical Profession in German Historiography.” In Reassessing Foucault: Power, Medicine and the Body, ed. and . London: Routledge, 181–212.Google Scholar
1953. The Tudor Revolution in Government: Administrative Changes in the Reign of Henry VIII. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. Return to Essentials: Some Reflections on the Present State of Historical Study. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. “Sur les limites du comparatisme en histoire culturelle,” Genèses. Sciences sociales et histoire 17.17:112–21.Google Scholar
2009. Cosmopolitan Islanders: British Historians and the European Continent. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. Le passé d’une illusion: essai sur l’idée communiste au XXe siècle. Paris: RobertLaffont/Calman-Lévy.Google Scholar
1987. “Out of the Orrery: E. P. Thompson on consciousness and history.” In Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan, 203–43.Google Scholar
1972. I benandanti. Stregoneria e culti agrari tra Cinquecento e Seicento, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
1980. “Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes: Clues and Scientific Method,” History Workshop Journal 9:5–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1981. The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller/Carlo Ginzburg, trans. John Tedeschi and Anne Tedeschi. London: Routledge &Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
2004. Hindu Nationalism and the Language of Politics in Late Colonial India. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Google Scholar
1982. “On Some Aspects of the Historiography of Colonial India,” Subaltern Studies 1:37–44.Google Scholar
1993. Righteous Discontent: The Women’s Movement in the Black Baptist Church, 1880–1920. Cambridge,MA: HarvardUniversity Press.Google Scholar
1965. History: Professional Scholarship in America. Baltimore: Johns HopkinsUniversity Press.Google Scholar
1972. “Karl Marx’s contribution to historiography.” In Ideology in Social Science: Readings in Critical Social Theory, ed. . London: Fontana, 265–83.Google Scholar
2010. “Economic History.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. , , and . London: Bloomsbury, 248–66.Google Scholar
1984. New Directions in European Historiography. Middletown,CT: WesleyanUniversity Press.Google Scholar
1997. Historiography in the Twentieth Century. Hanover andLondon: WeslyanUniversity Press.Google Scholar
2004a. Global Community: The Role of International Organizations in the Making of the Contemporary World. Berkeley: University ofCalifornia Press.Google Scholar
, and , eds. 1994. “Introduction.” In Reassessing Foucault: Power, Medicine and the Body. Studies in the social history of medicine. London: Routledge, 1–16.Google Scholar
2010. “‘Voices from Below’: Doing People’s History in Cardiff Docklands.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. S. Berger, H. Feldner, and K. Passmore. London: Bloomsbury, 330–52.Google Scholar
1980. Work, Society and Politics: The Culture of the Factory in Later Victorian England. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
1994. Democratic Subjects: the Self and the Social in Nineteenth-century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988. Mothers in the Fatherland: Women, the Family and Nazi Politics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1982. Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals and New Perspectives. Ithaca,NY: CornellUniversity Press.Google Scholar
2010. “Political History.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. , , and . London: Bloomsbury, 209–27.Google Scholar
, and . 1993. “The Poverty of Protest: Gareth Stedman Jones and the Politics of Language: A Reply,” Social History 18.1:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1974. “Les mentalités: Une histoire ambiguë.” In Faire de l’histoire, ed. . Paris: Gallimard, 76–94.Google Scholar
2010. “The Annales.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. , , and . London: Bloomsbury, 108–22.Google Scholar
1986. “The Decline of Ethnic Politics in Boston, 1882–1921.” Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society 98:116–34.Google Scholar
1985. End of American History: Democracy, Capitalism, and the Metaphor of Two Worlds in Anglo-American Historical Writing, 1880–1980. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
1988. That Noble Dream: The “objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. Engagement with the Past: The Lives and Works of the World War II Generation of Historians. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
2008. “The gendered genealogy of political religions theory,” Gender & History 20.3:644–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981. “What Is Social History?” In The Structured Crowd, ed. . Sussex: Harvester, 1–27.Google Scholar
1961. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. First published in 1957.
1995. “Historical Causation: Is One Thing More Important than Another?” History 80.259:227–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985. A Woman’s Place: An Oral History of Working-Class Women 1890–1940. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1964. The Crowd in History: A Study of Popular Disturbances in France and England, 1730–1848. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
2004. “Circulations, connexions et espaces transnationaux,” Genèses 57.4:110–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, New Haven,CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
1986. “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis,” The American Historical Review 91.5:1053–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988. “Women in The Making of the English Working Class.” In Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press, 68–90.Google Scholar
2006. The Invention of Decolonization: The Algerian War and the Remaking of France. Ithaca,NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1992. “Des droites et du politique.” In Histoire des droites en France, ed. . Paris: Gallimard, iii–xlv.Google Scholar
1990. “Telling the story: GR Elton and the Tudor Age,” Sixteenth Century Journal 21.2:151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981. Ladies of the Leisure Class: The Bourgeoisie of Northern France in the Nineteenth Century, PrincetonNJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1998. The Gender of History: Men, Women, and Historical Practice, Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1968. “Survivances ‘féodales’ dans la société rurale du XIXe siècle.” Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 23.5:965–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. The Broken Spell: A Cultural and Anthropological History of Preindustrial Europe. New Brunswick,NJ: Rutgers University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1982. “The Language of Chartism.” In The Chartist Experience: Studies in Working-Class Radicalism and Culture, 1830–60, ed. and . London: Macmillan, 3–57.Google Scholar
1983. “Rethinking Chartism.” In Languages of Class: Studies in English Working-Class History 1932–1982. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012. “When Was the Linguistic Turn? A Genealogy,” American Historical Review 117.3:700–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. “The Beginnings of Modern British Social History,” History Workshop Journal 43:155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2012. “Comment: Not Yet Far Enough,” American Historical Review 117.3:794–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1967. “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism,” Past & Present 38.1:56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century,” Past and Present 50:76–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1978. “Eighteenth-century English society: class struggle without class?”Social History 3.2:133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979a. “The Peculiarities of the English.” In The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays. Merlin: London.Google Scholar
2012. Review of A History of History (review no. 1356). Reviews in History. Downloaded at: [Accessed January 8, 2013].
1998. “L’histoire comparée des intellectuels comme histoire expérimentale.” In Pour une histoire comparée des intellectuels, ed. and . Paris: Complexe, 61–78.Google Scholar
2011. “Historical Writing in the United States.” In The Oxford History of Historical Writing: Volume 5, ed. and . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 199–219.Google Scholar
, 2010. “Social History.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. , , and . London: Bloomsbury, 228–47.Google Scholar
and 2006. “Beyond Comparison: Histoire Croisée and the Challenge of Reflexivity,” History and Theory 45.1:30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. The Search for Beulah Land: The Welsh and the Atlantic Revolution. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
2001. “Poore Men Will Speak One Day”: Plebeian Languages of Deference and Defiance in England, c. 1520–1640. In The Politics of the Excluded, ed. . New York: Palgrave, 202–27.Google Scholar
1985. From Menocchio to Piero Della Francesca: The Work of Carlo Ginzburg. The Historical Journal 28.4:983–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by