Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:33:53.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2023

Morganna Lambeth
Morganna Lambeth
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Heidegger's Interpretation of Kant
The Violence and the Charity
 , pp. 208 - 213
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adickes, Erich. 1924. Kant und das Ding an Sich. Berlin: Pan Verlag Rolf Heise.Google Scholar
Allais, Lucy. 2014. Manifest Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. Revised and enlarged edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Alweis, Lilian. 2015. “Heidegger’s Black Notebooks.” Philosophy 90.2: 305–316.Google Scholar
Banham, Gary. 2005. Kant’s Transcendental Imagination. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Barash, Jeffrey Andrew. 2012. “Ernst Cassirer, Martin Heidegger, and the Legacy of Davos.” History and Theory 51: 436–450.Google Scholar
Barrett, William. 1968. “The Flow of Time.” In The Philosophy of Time. Edited by Gale, Richard M.. London: Macmillan, 355–378.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. 2014. The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism, 1796–1880. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blattner, William. 1994. “Is Heidegger a Kantian Idealist?” Inquiry 37.2: 185–201.Google Scholar
Blattner, William. 1999. Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blattner, William. 2004. “Heidegger’s Kantian Idealism Revisited.” Inquiry 47.4: 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattner, William. 2006. “Heidegger’s Appropriation of Kant.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger. Edited by Guignon, Charles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 2002. Tales of the Mighty Dead. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 2000. “Review of William D. Blattner: ‘Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism.’” Journal of Philosophy 97.5: 308–312.Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 2003. Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 2010. “Heidegger’s Anti-Neo-Kantianism.” Philosophical Forum 37.1–2: 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, David. 2007. “Heidegger on Kant on Transcendence.” In Transcendental Heidegger. Edited by Crowell, Steven and Malpas, Jeff. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1967. “Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics: Remarks on Martin Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant.” In Kant: Disputed Questions. Edited and translated by Gram, Moltke S.. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 131–157.Google Scholar
Cerbone, David. 1995. “World, World-Entry, and Realism in Early Heidegger.” Inquiry 38: 401–421.Google Scholar
Child, William. 2006. “Interpreting People and Interpreting Texts.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14.3: 423–441.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann. 1902. System der Philosophie 1: Logik der reinen Erkenntniss. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
Crowell, Steven. 2001. “Neo-Kantianism: Between Science and Worldview.” In Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, Steven. 2002. “Does the Husserl/Heidegger Feud Rest on a Mistake? An Essay on Psychological and Transcendental Phenomenology.” Husserl Studies 18.2: 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert. 1916. “Das Schematismuskapitel in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft.” Kant-Studien 19.1–3: 338–366.Google Scholar
Cutrofello, Andrew. 1990 “Derrida’s Deconstruction of the Ideal of Legitimation.” Man and World 23: 157–170.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel. 1991. “Heidegger’s Kantian Turn: Notes to His Commentary on the ‘Kritik der reinen Vernunft.’” The Review of Metaphysics 45.2: 329–361.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel. 1994. “Heidegger’s Kant-Courses at Marburg.” In Reading Heidegger from the Start. Edited by Kisiel, Theodore and van Buren, John. Albany: State University of New York Press, 293–308.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel. 2010. “The Critique of Pure Reason and Continental Philosophy: Heidegger’s Interpretation of the Transcendental Imagination.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1991. “James Joyce and Humpty Dumpty.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 16: 1–12.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 2001a. “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge.” In Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 137–157.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 2001b. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Boer, Karin. 2000. Thinking in the Light of Time: Heidegger’s Encounter with Hegel. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
de Boer, Karin. 2020. Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Boer, Karin. 2022. “Response to Morganna Lambeth, Finitude and Discursivity in Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant.” Conference presentation (unpublished), Virtual Meeting of the North American Kant Society, March.Google Scholar
de Boer, Karin, and Howard, Stephen. 2019. “A Ground Completely Overgrown: Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27.2: 358–377.Google Scholar
Declève, Henri. 1970. Heidegger et Kant. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1988. “Afterword: Toward an Ethic of Discussion.” In Limited Inc. Translated by Samuel Weber. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 111–154.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert. 1991. Being-in-the-World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert. 2005. “Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers Can Profit from the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 79.2: 47–65.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert. 2007. “Response to McDowell.” Inquiry 50.4: 371–377.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert. 2013. “The Myth of the Pervasiveness of the Mental.” In Mind, Reason and Being-in-the-World. Edited by Schear, Joseph. New York: Routledge, 15–40.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey. 2014. Kant and Rational Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelland, Chad. 2017. Heidegger’s Shadow: Kant, Husserl, and the Transcendental Turn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Farías, Víctor. 1989. Heidegger and Nazism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Farin, Ingo, and Malpas, Jeff. 2016. “Introduction.” In Reading Heidegger’s Black Notebooks 1931–1941. Edited by Farin, Ingo and Malpas, Jeff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Franks, Paul W. 2005. All or Nothing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2000. A Parting of the Ways. Peru, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2013. Kant’s Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2013. Truth and Method [TM]. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Golob, Sacha. 2013. “Heidegger on Kant, Time, and the ‘Form’ of Intentionality.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21.2: 345–367.Google Scholar
Golob, Sacha. 2014. Heidegger on Concepts, Freedom, and Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter. 2010. Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter. 2013. “The Empire of Signs: Heidegger’s Critique of Idealism in Being and Time.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time. Edited by Wrathall, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grene, Marjorie. 1957. Martin Heidegger. London: Bowes and Bowes.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2000. “Absolute Idealism and the Rejection of Kantian Dualism.” In Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. 2nd edition. Edited by Ameriks, Karl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–56.Google Scholar
Han-Pile, Beatrice. 2005. “Early Heidegger’s Appropriation of Kant.” In A Companion to Heidegger. Edited by Dreyfus, Hubert and Wrathall, Mark. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Faith and Knowledge. Translated by W. Cerf and H. S. Harris. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Heidelberger, Michael. 2006. “Kantianism and Realism: Alois Riehl (and Moritz Schlick).” In The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science. Edited by Friedman, M., Nordmann, A., and Smith, G. E.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 227–247.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. 1994. “On the Unity of Subjectivity.” In The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy. Translated by Günter Zöller. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 17–54.Google Scholar
Hoppe, Hansgeorg. 1970. “Wandlungen in der Kant-Auffasung Heideggers.” In Durchblicke: Martin Heidegger zum 80. Geburtstag. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1997. Psychological and Transcendental Phenomenology and the Confrontation with Heidegger (1927–1931). Edited and translated by Sheehan, Thomas and Palmer, Richard E.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2000. The Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2003. The Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2004a. Lectures on Logic. Translated by J. Michael Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2004b. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Translated by Gary Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2006. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kinkaid, James. 2018. “Phenomenology, Idealism, and the Legacy of Kant.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27.3: 593–614.Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore. 1993. The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kraus, Katharina. 2019. “Rethinking the Relationship between Empirical Psychology and Transcendental Philosophy in Kant.” International Yearbook of German Idealism 15: 47–76.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael. 2004. “Why Did Cassirer and Heidegger not Debate in Davos?” In Symbolic Forms and Cultural Studies. Edited by Hamlin, Cyrus and Krois, John Michael. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 244–262.Google Scholar
Lafont, Cristina. 2008. “Meaning and Interpretation: Can Brandomian Scorekeepers Be Gadamerian Hermeneuts?” Philosophy Compass 3.1: 17–29.Google Scholar
Lambeth, Morganna. 2019. “A Case for Heidegger’s Interpretation of the Kantian Imagination.” In Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress ‘The Court of Reason’ (Oslo, 6–9 August 2019). Edited by Serck-Hanssen, Camilla and Himmelmann, Beatrix. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1285–1293.Google Scholar
Lambeth, Morganna. 2020. “Book Review: Heidegger’s Shadow: Kant, Husserl, and the Transcendental Turn.” Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 1.2: 257–263.Google Scholar
Lambeth, Morganna. 2021a. “A Proposal for Translating Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant.” Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual 11: 20–57.Google Scholar
Lambeth, Morganna. 2021b. “A Tale of Two Faculties: Heidegger’s Method of Interpreting Kant.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 38.1: 57–80.Google Scholar
Lambeth, Morganna and Yeomans, Christopher. Forthcoming. “Reconsidering Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism: Finding a Successful Argument with the Help of Fichte and Hegel.” Epoché.Google Scholar
Llewelyn, John. 2000. The HypoCritical Imagination: Between Kant and Levinas. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Beatrice. 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lotze, Hermann. 1843. Logik. Leipzig: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Löwith, Karl. 1995. “The Occasional Decisionism of Carl Schmitt.” In Martin Heidegger and European Nihilism. Edited by Wolin, Richard and translated by Gary Steiner. New York: Columbia University Press, 137–172.Google Scholar
Luft, Sebastian. 2011. “Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos (review).” Journal of the History of Philosophy 49.4: 508–509.Google Scholar
Lynch, Dennis A. 1990. “Ernst Cassirer and Martin Heidegger: The Davos Debate.” Kant-Studien 81.3: 360–370.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 2007a. “Response to Dreyfus.” Inquiry 50.4: 366–370.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 2007b. “What Myth?” Inquiry 50.4: 338–351.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 2013. “The Myth of the Mind as Detached.” In Mind, Reason and Being-in-the-World. Edited by Schear, Joseph. New York: Routledge, 41–58.Google Scholar
McLear, Colin. 2014. “The Kantian (Non)-Conceptualism Debate.” Philosophy Compass 9.11: 769–790.Google Scholar
McQuillan, Colin. 2017. “Kant, Heidegger, and the In/Finitude of Human Reason.” CR: The New Centennial Review 17.3: 81–102.Google Scholar
McQuillan, Colin. 2021. “Comments on Lambeth, ‘The Role of Receptivity in Heidegger’s Kant Interpretation.’” Conference Presentation (unpublished), Central Division Meeting of the American Philosophical Association, February.Google Scholar
Mörchen, Hermann. 1970. Die Einbildungskraft bei Kant. 2nd edition. Tübingen: Max Niemayer.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul. 1923. Die Logischen Grundlagen der exakten Wissenschaften. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul. 2015. “Kant and the Marburg School.” Translated by Frances Bottenberg. In The Neo-Kantian Reader. Edited by Luft, Sebastian. London: Routledge, 180–197.Google Scholar
Newton, Alexandra. 2016. “Non-Conceptualism and Knowledge in Lucy Allais’s Manifest Reality.” Kantian Review 21.2: 273–282.Google Scholar
Nir, Gilad. 2021. “Heidegger on the Unity of Metaphysics and the Method of Being and Time.” The Review of Metaphysics, 74.3: 361–396.Google Scholar
Nordmann, Alfred. 2006. “Critical Realism, Critical Idealism, and Critical Common-Sensism: The School and World Philosophies of Riehl, Cohen, and Peirce.” In The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science. Edited by Friedman, M., Nordmann, A., and Smith, G. E.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 249–274.Google Scholar
Philipse, Herman. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Piché, Claude. 2000. “Heidegger and the Neo-Kantian Reading of Kant.” In Heidegger, German Idealism, and Neo-Kantianism. Edited by Rockmore, Tom. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 179–208.Google Scholar
Poma, Andrea. 1997. The Critical Philosophy of Hermann Cohen. Translated by John Denton. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Reid, James D. 2003. “On the Unity of Theoretical Subjectivity in Kant and Fichte.” The Review of Metaphysics 57: 243–277.Google Scholar
Richardson, William J. 1993. Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought. 4th edition. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1978. “The Critique of Religion.” In The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. Edited by Reagan, Charles E. and Stewart, David. Boston: Beacon Press, 213–222.Google Scholar
Rousse, B. Scot. 2022. “Retrieving Heidegger’s Temporal Realism.” European Journal of Philosophy 30.1: 205–226.Google Scholar
Safranski, Rüdiger. 1998. Martin Heidegger: Between Good and Evil. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sallis, John. 1980. Gathering of Reason. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sallis, John. 1987. Spacings – Of Reason and Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schalow, Frank. 1992. The Renewal of the Heidegger-Kant Dialogue. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Schalow, Frank. 2013. Departures: At the Crossroads between Heidegger and Kant. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schalow, Frank. 2016. “A Diltheyan Loop? The Methodological Side of Heidegger’s Kant-Interpretation.” Frontiers of Philosophy in China 11.3: 377–394.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 2010. The World as Will and Representation [WWR], vol. 1. Translated by Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman, and Christopher Janaway. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Serafin, Andrzej. 2015. “A Reception History of the Black Notebooks.” Gatherings 5: 118–142.Google Scholar
Serck-Hanssen, Camilla. 2015. “Towards Fundamental Ontology: Heidegger’s Phenomenological Reading of Kant.” Continental Philosophy Review 48: 217–235.Google Scholar
Sherover, Charles. 1971. Heidegger, Kant, and Time. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter. 1966. Bounds of Sense. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Truwant, Simon. 2022. Cassirer and Heidegger in Davos: The Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waxman, Wayne. 1991. Kant’s Model of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weatherston, Martin. 2002. Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Woodward, William R. 2015. Hermann Lotze: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark. 2022. “The Question of Ontological Dependency.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30.3: 547–559.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Morganna Lambeth, Purdue University, Indiana
  • Book: Heidegger's Interpretation of Kant
  • Online publication: 01 June 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009239271.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Morganna Lambeth, Purdue University, Indiana
  • Book: Heidegger's Interpretation of Kant
  • Online publication: 01 June 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009239271.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Morganna Lambeth, Purdue University, Indiana
  • Book: Heidegger's Interpretation of Kant
  • Online publication: 01 June 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009239271.010
Available formats
×